You are on page 1of 63

Antennas

Antennas
Transmitter

Transmitting
Antenna

Electromagnetic
Wave

Transmission Line

Receiver

Receiving
Antenna

Electromagnetic
Wave

Transmission Line

Antennas are transducers that transfer electromagnetic energy


between a transmission line and free space.
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

Here are a few examples of common antennas:


Linear monopole
fed by a single wire
over a ground plane

Linear dipole fed


by a two-wire line

Ground plane

Coaxial ground
plane antenna

Linear elements connected


to outer conductor of the
coaxial cable simulate the
ground plane

Multiple loop antenna wound


around a ferrite core

Loop antenna
Uda-Yagi dipole array
Loop dipole

Parabolic (dish) antenna

Logperiodic array

Passive elements
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

From a circuit point of view, a transmitting antenna behaves like an


equivalent impedance that dissipates the power transmitted

Transmitter

Transmitting
Antenna

Electromagnetic
Wave

Transmission Line

1
P( t ) = Req I 2
2

Transmitter

Zg
Vg

Zeq

Transmission Line

= Req + jXeq

The transmitter is equivalent to a generator.


Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

A receiving antenna behaves like a generator with an internal


impedance corresponding to the antenna equivalent impedance.
Receiver

Receiving
Antenna

Electromagnetic
Wave

Transmission Line

ZR

Zeq
Zin

Transmission Line

1
P( t ) = Rin I 2
2
Veq

The receiver represents the load impedance that dissipates the time
average power generated by the receiving antenna.
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

Antennas are in general reciprocal devices, which can be used both


as transmitting and as receiving elements. This is how the
antennas on cellular phones and walkietalkies operate.
The basic principle of operation of an antenna is easily understood
starting from a twowire transmission line, terminated by an open
circuit.
|I|
Zg
ZR

Vg

Open circuit

|I|

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Note: This is the return


current on the second wire,
not the reflected current
already included in the
standing wave pattern.

Antennas

Imagine to bend the end of the transmission line, forming a dipole


antenna. Because of the change in geometry, there is now an
abrupt change in the characteristic impedance at the transition
point, where the current is still continuous. The dipole leaks
electromagnetic energy into the surrounding space, therefore it
reflects less power than the original open circuit the standing
wave pattern on the transmission line is modified
| I0 |
Zg
|I|
Vg

Z0

|I|

| I0 |
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

In the space surrounding the dipole we have an electric field. At


zero frequency (d.c. bias), fixed electrostatic field lines connect the
metal elements of the antenna, with circular symmetry.

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

At higher frequency, the current oscillates in the wires and the field
emanating from the dipole changes periodically. The field lines
propagate away from the dipole and form closed loops.

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

The electromagnetic field emitted by an antenna obeys Maxwells


equations

E = j H

H = J + j E
Under the assumption of uniform isotropic medium we have the
wave equation:

E = j H = j J + 2 E
H = J + j E
= J + 2 H
Note that in the regions with electrical charges

E = E 2 E = ( ) 2 E
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Antennas

In general, these wave equations are difficult to solve, because of


the presence of the terms with current and charge. It is easier to
use the magnetic vector potential and the electric scalar potential.
The definition of the magnetic vector potential is

B=A
Note that since the divergence of the curl of a vector is equal to
zero we always satisfy the zero divergence condition

B = ( A) = 0
We have also

E = j H = j A ( E + j A) = 0
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

10

Antennas

We define the scalar potential first noticing that

( ) = 0
and then choosing (with sign convention as in electrostatics)

( E + j A) = ( ) E = j A
Note that the magnetic vector potential is not uniquely defined,
since for any arbitrary scalar field

B = A = ( A + )
In order to uniquely define the magnetic vector potential, the
standard approach is to use the Lorenz gauge

A + j = 0
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

11

Antennas

From Maxwells equations

H=

B = J + j E

B = J + j E

( A) = J + j ( j A )
From vector calculus

( ) = ( ) 2
( A) = ( A) 2 A = J + 2 A j
Lorenz Gauge

A = j
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

( A) = j
12

Antennas

Finally, the wave equation for the magnetic vector potential is

2A + 2 A = 2A + 2 A = J
For the electric field we have

D = E = ( j A ) =

2
2
+ j A = + j ( j ) =

The wave equation for the electric scalar potential is

+ = + =

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

13

Antennas

The wave equations are inhomogenoeous Helmholtz equations,


which apply to regions where currents and charges are not zero.
We use the following system of coordinates for an antenna body

J( r ')
( r ')

Observation point

r r'

dV '
r'

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Radiating antenna body

14

Antennas

The generals solutions for the wave equations are

j r r '

J ( r ') e

A( r ) =
4 V
r r'

( r) =

4 V

( r ') e j r r '
r r'

dV '

dV '

The integrals are extended to all points over the antenna body
where the sources (current density, charge) are not zero. The effect
of each volume element of the antenna is to radiate a radial wave

j r r '

r r'
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

15

Antennas

Infinitesimal Antenna

Observation point

J(0)

(0)

r = r r'

S
r' = 0

dV '

Infinitesimal antenna body

I = constant
phasor

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

z <<
Dielectric medium ( , )

16

Antennas

The current flowing in the infinitesimal antenna is assumed to be


constant and oriented along the zaxis

I = S J ( r ') = S J ( 0 )

V ' = S z

V 'J ( r ') = I z iz
The solution of the wave equation for the magnetic vector potential
simply becomes the evaluation of the integrand at the origin

I z e j r
A=
iz
4 r

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

H= A


E= 1 H

j
17

Antennas

There is still a major mathematical step left. The curl operations


must be expressed in terms of spherical coordinates

ir
i

Polar angle

Azimuthal angle

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

18

Antennas

In spherical coordinates

ir

r i

r sin i

A= 2
r sin r

Ar

rA

r sin A

=
sin A
( A ) i r

r sin

1 1

+
( Ar ) r A i
r sin
r

+ ( r A )
( Ar ) i
r r

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

19

Antennas

We had

I z e j r
A=
iz
4 r

with

i z = i r cos i sin

j I z e j r
1
1+
sin
A = i

4 r
j r

For the fields we have

j r
I
j

z
e

1
1
H = A = i
1+
sin

4 r
j r

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

20

Antennas

j r
j I z e
E=
H=
j

4 r

1
1
2 cos
+
ir
2

j r ( j r )

1
1
+ sin 1 +
+
i
2
j r ( j r )

The general field expressions can be simplified for observation


point at large distance from the infinitesimal antenna

1 >>

1
j r

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

>>

( j r )

r=

r >> 1

21

Antennas

At large distance we have the expressions for the Far Field

j I z e j r
H i
sin
4 r
E i

j r
j I z e
sin
4 r

2 r >>

At sufficient distance from the antenna, the radiated fields are


perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation.
The magnetic field and electric field are in phase and

E =
H = H

These are also properties of uniform plane waves.


Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

22

Antennas

However, there are significant differences with respect to a uniform


plane wave:
The surfaces of constant phase are spherical instead of planar,
and the wave travels in the radial direction.
The intensities of the fields are inversely proportional to the
distance, therefore the field intensities decay while they are
constant for a uniform plane wave.
The field intensities are not constant on a given surface of
constant phase. The intensity depends on the sine of the polar
angle .
The radiated power density is

2
1
1
*
P( t ) = Re E H = i r
H
2
2
2

I z
2
= ir
sin

2 4 r
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

23

Antennas

P( t )

H
J

The spherical wave resembles a plane wave locally in a small


neighborhood of the point ( r, , ).
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

24

Antennas

Radiation Patterns
Electric Field and Magnetic Field

E or H

Fixed r

Plane containing the antenna

Plane perpendicular to the antenna

proportional to sin

omnidirectional or isotropic

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

25

Antennas

Timeaverage Power Flow (Poynting Vector)

P( t )

Fixed r

Plane containing the antenna

Plane perpendicular to the antenna

proportional to sin2

omnidirectional or isotropic

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

26

Antennas

Total Radiated Power


The timeaverage power flow is not uniform on the spherical wave
front. In order to obtain the total power radiated by the infinitesimal
antenna, it is necessary to integrate over the sphere

2
Ptot =
d
0
= 2

d r 2 sin P (t )

I z
2
3
=
2

sin

r
d

0
2 4 r
=4 3

4 I z
=

3 4

Note: the total radiated power is independent of distance. Although


the power density decreases with distance, the integral of the
power over concentric spherical wave fronts remains constant.

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

27

Antennas

Ptot1 = Ptot 2

Ptot 2
Ptot1

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

28

Antennas

The total radiated power is also the power delivered by the


transmission line to the real part of the equivalent impedance seen
at the input of the antenna

1 2
4 2 I z 1 2 2 z 2
Ptot = I Req =
= I

2
3 4 2 3

Req
The equivalent resistance of the antenna is usually called radiation
resistance. In free space

z
o

= o =
= 120 [ ] Req = 80 2
]
[

o

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

29

Antennas

The total radiated power is also used to define the average power
density emitted by the antenna. The average power density
corresponds to the radiation of a hypothetical omnidirectional
(isotropic) antenna, which is used as a reference to understand the
directive properties of any antenna.
Power radiation pattern of an
omnidirectional average antenna

Power radiation pattern


of the actual antenna

x
Pave

P( t, )
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

30

Antennas

The timeaverage power density is given by

Pave =

Total Radiated Power


Surface of wave front

I z
2 1
I z)
=
=
=
2 12 (
2
3 4 r
4 r
4 r
Ptot

The directive gain of the infinitesimal antenna is defined as

D( , ) =

P( t , r, )
Pave

2 1

I z
I z
2
=
si
n

2 4 r
3 4 r
2

3 2
= sin
2
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

31

Antennas

The maximum value of the directive gain is called directivity of the


antenna. For the infinitesimal antenna, the maximum of the
directive gain occurs when the polar angle is 90

3 2
= 1.5
Directivity = max { D( , )} = sin
2
2
The directivity gives a measure of how the actual antenna performs
in the direction of maximum radiation, with respect to the ideal
isotropic antenna which emits the average power in all directions.

Pave

max

90

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

32

Antennas

The infinitesimal antenna is a suitable model to study the behavior


of the elementary radiating element called Hertzian dipole.
Consider two small charge reservoirs, separated by a distance z,
which exchange mobile charge in the form of an oscillatory curent

I( t)
t

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

33

Antennas

The Hertzian dipole can be used as an elementary model for many


natural charge oscillation phenomena. The radiated fields can be
described by using the results of the infinitesimal antenna.
Assuming a sinusoidally varying charge flow between the
reservoirs, the oscillating current is

I( t)
current flowing
out of reservoir

d
d
= q( t) = qo cos( t)
dt
dt

charge on
reference reservoir

I o = j qo

phasor

Radiation
pattern

Io
qo
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

34

Antennas

A short wire antenna has a triangular current distribution, since the


current itself has to reach a null at the end the wires. The current
can be made approximately uniform by adding capacitor plates.

Imax

Io

Io
The small capacitor plate antenna is equivalent to a Hertzian dipole
and the radiated fields can also be described by using the results of
the infinitesimal antenna. The short wire antenna can be described
by the same results, if one uses an average current value giving the
same integral of the current

Io = Imax 2
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

35

Antennas

Example A Hertzian dipole is 1.0 mm long and it operates at the


frequency of 1.0 GHz, with feeding current Io = 1.0 Ampres. Find
the total radiated power.

= c f 3 10 8 109 = 0.3 m = 300 mm


z = 1 mm Hertzian dipole
4 2 Io z 2
1
2 2
=
120 (
) ( 1 10 3 )2
Ptot =
3 4
12
0.3
o

Io

= 4.39 mW
For a short dipole with triangular current distribution and maximum
current Imax = 1.0 Ampre

Io = Imax 2
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Ptot = 4.39 / 4 1.09 mW


36

Antennas

Timedependent fields - Consider the farfield approximation

j I z sin j ( t r )
H ( t ) = Re H e
e
i Re

4 r

I z sin

2
i Re
jcos( t r )+ j sin( t r )
4 r

I z sin
i
sin( t r )
4 r
j t

E ( t ) = Re E e j t

I z sin
i
sin( t r )
4 r
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

37

Antennas

Linear Antennas
Consider a dipole with wires of length comparable to the
wavelength.

L2

'
z
z'

r'

i '

L1
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

38

Antennas

Because of its length, the current flowing in the antenna wire is a


function of the coordinate z. To evaluate the farfield at an
observation point, we divide the antenna into segments which can
be considered as elementary infinitesimal antennas.
The electric field radiated by each element , in the farfield
approximation, is

j r '
j I z e
sin '
4 r '

E' = i

In farfield conditions we can use these additional approximations

'
r ' r z 'cos
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

39

Antennas

The lines r and r are nearly parallel under these assumptions.

L2

'

r'
r

z
z'

z 'cos

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

This length is neglected if

r ' r z 'cos

40

Antennas

The electric field contributions due to each infinitesimal segment


becomes
you cannot
neglect here

E' = i

j r j z 'cos
j

z
e
e
I

sin

4 r 4 z 'cos
you can
neglect here

The total fields are obtained by integration of all the contributions

E = i

L2
j e j r
sin
I( z) e j z cos dz
L1
4 r

L2
j e j r
H = i
sin
I( z) e j z cos dz
L1
4 r
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

41

Antennas

Short Dipole
Consider a short symmetric dipole comprising two wires, each of
length L << . Assume a triangular distribution of the phasor
current on the wires

Imax ( 1 z L )
I( z) =
Imax ( 1 + z L )

z0
z<0

The integral in the field expressions becomes

L
L
2L
j z cos
I( z) e
I( z) dz =
dz
Imax
L
L
2
1

since max

z = L =

1 for a short dipole

e j z cos 1
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

42

Antennas

The final expression for farfields of the short dipole are similar to
the expressions for the Hertzian dipole where the average of the
triangular current distribution is used

E = i

j r

j e
4 r

z
Imax
sin 2 L
2
average
current

= i

j Imax L e j r
sin

4 r

j Imax L e j r
H = i
sin
4 r

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

43

Antennas

Halfwavelength dipole
Consider a symmetric linear antenna with total length /2 and
assume a current phasor distribution on the wires which is
approximately sinusoidal

I( z) = Imax cos( z)
The integral in the field expressions is

Imax cos ( z) e

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

j z cos

cos
dz =
cos
2
2
sin
2 Imax

44

Antennas

We obtain the farfield expressions

E = i

j e j r Imax
cos
cos
2
2 r sin

j e j r Imax
cos
H = i
cos
2
2 r sin
and the timeaverage Poynting vector

P( t ) = i r

Imax
2 cos
cos
2
2
2
2
8 r sin

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

45

Antennas

The total radiated power is obtained after integration of the


timeaverage Poynting vector

1 2
Ptot = Imax
2

1 2 1 cos ( u)
du

u
4
2.4376

1 2
= Imax
0.193978
2

Req
The integral above cannot be solved analytically, but the value is
found numerically or from published tables.
The equivalent
resistance of the halfwave dipole antenna in air is then

Req ( 2) =
0.193978 73.07

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

46

Antennas

The direction of maximum radiation strength is obtained again for


polar angle =90 ande we obtain the directivity

D=

P( t, r, 90)
Ptot 4 r

2
Imax
8 2 r 2

2
I
2 2 max

8 r

2.4376

1.641

The directivity of the halfwavelength dipole is marginally better


than the directivity for a Hertzian dipole (D = 1.5).
The real improvement is in the much larger radiation resistance,
which is now comparable to the characteristic impedance of typical
transmission line.
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

47

Antennas

From the linear antenna applet


Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

48

Antennas

For short dipoles of length 0.0005 to 0.05


Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

49

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

50

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

51

Antennas

For general symmetric linear antennas with two wires of length L, it


is convenient to express the current distribution on the wires as

I ( z) = Imax sin { ( L z ) }
The integral in the field expressions is now

Imax sin ( L z ) e j z cos dz =


2 Imax
2

sin

{ cos ( L cos ) cos ( L) }

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

52

Antennas

The field expressions become

E = i
= i

L2
j e j r
sin
I( z) e j z cos dz
L1
4 r

j Imax e j r
cos ( L cos ) cos ( L ) }
{
2 r sin

L2
j e j r
H = i
sin
I( z) e j z cos dz
L1
4 r

j Imax e j r
= i
cos ( L cos ) cos ( L ) }
{
2 r sin

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

53

Antennas

Examples of long wire antennas


Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

54

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

55

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

56

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

57

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

58

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

59

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

60

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

61

Antennas

Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

62

Antennas
Radiation Pattern for E and H

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Power Radiation Pattern

63

You might also like