Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wisconsin PT Workshop Notes
Wisconsin PT Workshop Notes
WELCOME
Gary Whited
Scot Becker
University of Wisconsin
What is P/T?
Basics
of
Prestressing
University of Wisconsin
Basics of Prestressing
pre-tensioning
2 methods:
post-tensioning
bonded
2 types:
unbonded
University of Wisconsin
Pre-tensioned:
University of Wisconsin
Anchoring
bulkhead
strands
run
between
the plates
and
anchored
University of Wisconsin
Anchoring bulkhead
with strands placed
strand
chuck
University of Wisconsin
stirrups for
embedment
in slab,
composite
action
Multiple
girders cast at
once and
separated by
bulkheads;
spacing
bulkhead
strands
University of Wisconsin
Post-tensioned:
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Bonded:
University of Wisconsin
BA
RE
ST
RA
ND
S
P/
TS
UC
TD
University of Wisconsin
Bare
pre-tens
strand
Post-ten
ducts
University of Wisconsin
GROUT
MIXER/PUMP
PUMP END OF
DUCT
University of Wisconsin
Unbonded:
University of Wisconsin
10
University of Wisconsin
11
BRIDGES
Pretensioning and post-tensioning both used;
Pretensioning: almost always bonded, unless
special conditions require less
prestress strands partially
unbonded;
Post-tensioning: should be bonded or very
specials measures taken to
prevent tendon corrosion
University of Wisconsin
Calculating
Effects
of
Prestress
on a
Concrete Member
University of Wisconsin
12
University of Wisconsin
No axial load,
so C = T
13
y
eI
T
TA
fy
y
MI
y
eI
T
TA
fy
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
14
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
15
University of Wisconsin
Load Balancing:
Draping strand:
Total stress at any fiber y
University of Wisconsin
16
University of Wisconsin
others
straight
second girder
si
le
ng
rd
gi
er
University of Wisconsin
17
With post-tensioning:
It is easy to get the tendon in exactly the shape desired
to cancel out the bending!
A hollow duct is placed in the beam in the desired shape.
Since the tendon is not tightened yet, it doesnt try to
go into a straight line shape.
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
18
University of Wisconsin
Prestressing:
From the calculations we can see that the actual
stresses in a member can be
CONTROLLED
by adjusting the tendon location
e and the applied prestress
force T.
University of Wisconsin
19
Aim of Prestressing
control amount of tension in concrete
limit concrete tension to a level below cracking
keep uncracked cross section
moment of inertia stays = Igross
ed
crack
Igross
Igross
University of Wisconsin
20
summary
pretension & post-tension .
post-tensioning .
Purpose of Workshop
what is post-tensioning?
University of Wisconsin
21
University of Wisconsin
anchor casting
embedded in
concrete
University of Wisconsin
22
University of Wisconsin
anchor head
(bears on anchor
casting)
wedges
seated in
conical holes
University of Wisconsin
23
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
24
University of Wisconsin
25
alternate to strand
pull bar with jack,
tighten nut in place
University of Wisconsin
when to use
CRACKING -- possible situation where
cracking might develop and
affect:
durability, or
performance
University of Wisconsin
26
University of Wisconsin
target piers
University of Wisconsin
27
section BB
University of Wisconsin
Section
BB
36 - #11
epoxy
coated
rebar
University of Wisconsin
28
girder
girder
GIRDER 4
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
29
Girder 4
Girder 3
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
30
Between 2 & 3
University of Wisconsin
pier
deflection
Cracking:
due to weight of girders alone
(deck not formed or poured)
University of Wisconsin
31
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
32
cracking =
reduced moment of inertia &
increased deflections
pier cracking
additional softening and deflection
University of Wisconsin
cracking =
reduced moment of inertia &
increased deflections
deflection (inch)
pier 2 deflections
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
-1.4
measured
cracked sub
100
200
300
400
University of Wisconsin
33
thread bars
live end
jacking
dead end
embedded
anchor
36 - #11
epoxy
coated
rebar
post-tension
to prevent
cracking
dead end
embedded
anchor
University of Wisconsin
LONG SPAN
125 ft center span eliminated need for a midspan pier
5 tendons, each with nine 0.6 strands
University of Wisconsin
34
University of Wisconsin
from AECOM
University of Wisconsin
from AECOM
35
University of Wisconsin
from AECOM
MUST HAVE:
vent tubes
at high point
to allow air
escape as
grout is
pumped in
University of Wisconsin
from AECOM
36
University of Wisconsin
2. feeder
from AECOM
anchor head
& wedges
University of Wisconsin
from AECOM
37
grout vents
grout
tubes
University of Wisconsin
from AECOM
University of Wisconsin
38
EXAMPLE
Bridge Design
&
Construction Controls
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
Cantilevered
girders
post-ten ducts
PCI J V38, N4
Spliced girders
drop-in span
girder
PCI J V38, N4
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
I-15
Salt Lake City
Ascent, Sp 99
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
Ascent, F 97
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
Ascent, F 97
Rock Cut Bridge, three 63, 40 ton girders spliced for 190 span
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
eliminated a
center pier
in stream bed
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
Spliced girders
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
joints
filled
when
decked
University of Wisconsin
Spliced girders
I-15
Salt Lake City
temporary const.
supports at
splice points
Ascent, Sp 99
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
post-tension
decking
University of Wisconsin
suspended girder
University of Wisconsin
10
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
11
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
12
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
13
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
14
University of Wisconsin
FOR DESIGN:
15
Construction Sequence:
16
Design Process:
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
17
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
18
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
19
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
20
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
21
1000
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-1000
-2000
-3000
moments from
removal of
temporary supports
(reaction gone)
-4000
-5000
-6000
distance (ft)
actual int
actual ext
University of Wisconsin
moment (kip-ft)
2500
temp
bent
reaction
on girder
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
-1000
-1500
distance (feet)
moment (ft-kip)
moment (ft-kip)
2000
2000
0
0
50
100
150
-2000
-4000
-6000
distance (ft)
unit load
actual int
actual ext
University of Wisconsin
22
3500
4000
3000
2000
2500
moment (kip-ft)
1500
1000
500
0
-500
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-2000
-4000
180
-6000
-1000
-1500
-8000
Service 1 Total DL
M
distance (feet)
distance (feet)
8000
6000
4000
moment (kip-ft)
moment (kip-ft)
2000
2000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-2000
-4000
-6000
-8000
University of Wisconsin
distance (feet)
University of Wisconsin
23
University of Wisconsin
se
g ca n
n
i
l
l
ro
io
cont retens
for p esign
d
pretension in girders only needs to be
sufficient to carry girder and deck
weight on the initial short temp spans!
University of Wisconsin
24
:
case l
s
i
h
kt
t ro
chec ly to con
ik e
not l design
University of Wisconsin
l l be
this wi case
lling
contro design
f or P / T
cracking in deck over pier (-M)
& comp in bottom flange at pier
University of Wisconsin
25
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
26
University of Wisconsin
27
non-composite girders
4000
before
deck is
hardened
weight is
carried by
girders
(non-composite)
3500
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
-1000
distance (ft)
interior
exterior
University of Wisconsin
non-composite girders
4000
3500
3000
moment (kip-ft)
moment (kip-ft)
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
-1000
distance (ft)
University of Wisconsin
interior
exterior
28
stress (ksi)
1.5
1
0.5
0
-0.5
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-1
-1.5
-2
distance (ft)
top
bottom
ten allow
University of Wisconsin
29
e approx.
Note: dont us
in WBM,
as
on
loss equati
)
losses (75yrs
overestimates
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
30
ksi
1.266 d
e
d
e
ne
University of Wisconsin
pre-tensioned
stress (ksi)
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-0.5
-1
distance (ft)
top
bottom
ten allow
31
non-composite girders
4000
3500
moment (kip-ft)
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
-1000
distance (ft)
University of Wisconsin
interior
exterior
moment diagram
University of Wisconsin
32
moment diagram
University of Wisconsin
moment diagram
equal +M an M
both smaller
University of Wisconsin
33
Pre-tension design
Summary:
the 2 end span girders have 12 strands
for pre-tension at the bottom;
the middle span girder does not
require any pre-tension;
University of Wisconsin
Post-tension Design
University of Wisconsin
34
Note:
with W82 girder
web is 6.5 wide,
3.4 duct is largest
to fit!! limit ~ 12 strands
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
35
University of Wisconsin
note:
the e is less than the kern,
that means that the P/T will cause compression
at the bottom of the beam, the pier moments will also!
University of Wisconsin
36
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
37
University of Wisconsin
Post-Tensioning
University of Wisconsin
38
University of Wisconsin
Post-Tensioning
University of Wisconsin
39
Post-Tensioning
University of Wisconsin
unit load
225k
moment diagram
University of Wisconsin
40
unit load
225k
Need to eliminate the 225k reaction:
University of Wisconsin
unit load
upward 6.25k/ft
moments
4000
moment (ft-k)
3000
2000
1000
0
-1000 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-2000
-3000
distance
University of Wisconsin
41
tendon profile
40
inches
20
+18.4 in.
0
-20
-13.2 in.
-40
-60
-80 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
250
300
350
distance (ft)
University of Wisconsin
tendon profile
40
inches
20
+18.4 in.
0
-20
-13.2 in.
-40
-60
-80 0
50
100
150
200
distance (ft)
University of Wisconsin
42
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
43
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
44
18ft
162ft
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
45
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
46
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
47
stress (ksi)
jack at
this end
Tendon Stress
(with friction loss)
215
100
210
80
205
60
200
40
195
20
190
185
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
-20
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
48
Friction loss
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
49
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
50
Tendon Stress
(with friction loss)
100
215
--- sl
stress (ksi)
210
ope
---
80
205
60
200
40
195
20
190
185
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
-20
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
Tendon Stress
stress (ksi)
215
100
210
80
205
60
200
40
195
20
190
0
-20
185
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
51
Tendon Stress
stress (ksi)
215
100
210
80
205
60
200
40
195
20
190
185
-20
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
Tendon Stress
stress (ksi)
215
100
210
80
205
60
200
40
195
20
190
185
-20
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
52
Tendon Stress
210
100
205
80
200
60
40
195
20
190
0
-20
185
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
Tendon Stress
(with friction and seating loss)
100
210
80
205
stress (ksi)
stress (ksi)
200
60
40
195
20
190
0
-20
185
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
53
University of Wisconsin
Tendon Stress
(with friction and seating loss)
100
210
80
ra
e xt s e
a
e
rel
stress (ksi)
205
200
move
down
60
40
195
20
190
0
-20
185
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
54
University of Wisconsin
100
196
80
stress (ksi)
194
60
192
40
190
20
188
186
-20
184
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
distance (ft)
tendon stress
tendon profile
University of Wisconsin
55
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
56
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
57
733.9
328.7
Tpt0
590.3
442.3
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
58
STRUTS:
University of Wisconsin
Add ties:
University of Wisconsin
59
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
60
University of Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
61
EXAMPLE
Bridge Design
&
Construction Controls
University of Wisconsin
OTHER DESIGNS
University of Wisconsin
62
University of Wisconsin
longitudinal reinforcing
is replaced with post-tensioning
ducts
University of Wisconsin
63
with P/T:
64
University of Wisconsin
P/T Concepts
University of Wisconsin
65