You are on page 1of 103

University of Wisconsin

WELCOME
Gary Whited

Construction and Materials Support Center, U.W.

Scot Becker

Chief Development Engineer, WisDOT

University of Wisconsin

What is P/T?

Method of applying a large compression force


to a structure (concrete) before loading occurs.
Applying that force AFTER the concrete has
already hardened.
May also apply bending forces - to try to
counteract bending created when load is
applied.
University of Wisconsin

Basics
of
Prestressing
University of Wisconsin

Basics of Prestressing

pre-tensioning
2 methods:
post-tensioning

bonded
2 types:
unbonded

University of Wisconsin

tendon = a group of tension


strands or bars used
for prestressing;

Pre-tensioned:

Tendons are stretched and


anchored to strong bulkheads,
then concrete is placed around
the stretched tendon.

University of Wisconsin

Tendons are stretched and


anchored to strong bulkheads,

Anchoring
bulkhead

strands
run
between
the plates
and
anchored

University of Wisconsin

Anchoring bulkhead
with strands placed

strand
chuck

University of Wisconsin

then concrete is placed around


the stretched tendon.
Long line
precasting
bed;

stirrups for
embedment
in slab,
composite
action

Multiple
girders cast at
once and
separated by
bulkheads;
spacing
bulkhead

strands

University of Wisconsin

Post-tensioned:

The concrete is first placed


around embedded tubes or ducts
after the concrete is hardened
tendons are placed in the ducts,
stretched to desired tension,
and then anchored against the
concrete at the ends.

University of Wisconsin

The concrete is first placed


around embedded tubes or ducts

End anchorages for tendons

University of Wisconsin

Draped P/T ducts

University of Wisconsin

after the concrete is hardened tendons are placed in the ducts,


stretched, and then anchored against the concrete at the ends.

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

P/T strands anchored at end


University of Wisconsin

Bonded:

The tendon is bonded to the concrete


pre-tensioned: concrete is placed directly
around the bare exposed steel;
post-tensioned: grout is pumped into the
duct after the strand is stretched.

University of Wisconsin

BA
RE

ST
RA
ND
S

pre-tensioned: concrete is placed directly


around the bare exposed steel;

P/
TS
UC
TD

University of Wisconsin

Bare
pre-tens
strand

Post-ten
ducts

University of Wisconsin

post-tensioned: grout is pumped into the


duct after the tendon is stretched.
GROUT FLOWS
OUT OPPOSITE
END

GROUT
MIXER/PUMP

PUMP END OF
DUCT
University of Wisconsin

Unbonded:

The tendon is coated to prevent


bonding to the concrete pre-tensioned: usually strand is covered
with a plastic sheath;
post-tensioned: the duct is NOT grouted
but the steel is protected by pumping
grease or another coating into the duct.

University of Wisconsin

10

pre-tensioned: usually strand is covered


with a plastic sheath;

University of Wisconsin

Plastic sheathed/greased strand


University of Wisconsin

11

BRIDGES
Pretensioning and post-tensioning both used;
Pretensioning: almost always bonded, unless
special conditions require less
prestress strands partially
unbonded;
Post-tensioning: should be bonded or very
specials measures taken to
prevent tendon corrosion
University of Wisconsin

Calculating
Effects
of
Prestress
on a
Concrete Member

University of Wisconsin

12

Internal forces in prestressed beam no external loading:


No external load applied to beam: there cannot be any internal moment.
M=0

Since there is no internal


moment from loads the resultant C in concrete must
act on the same line of action
as the T in the strand.
strand

We separate the C and T:


C is the compression created in the CONCRETE
T is the tension applied to the TENDON

University of Wisconsin

Internal forces in prestressed beam - no external loading:


Axial load eccentricity in concrete

Considering only forces in the concrete:

No axial load,
so C = T

Resulting eccentric compression causes an axial force and a moment: M = Ce


University of Wisconsin

13

internal concrete stresses


When the strand is eccentric,
below the cgc,
the moment is opposite that shown
= a negative moment.

y
eI
T

TA

fy

the stress in concrete at any


height y above the cgc:
(compression is +)

Stress due prestressing alone

y
MI

y
eI
T

TA

fy

When loads are applied, the


additional moments M create
added stress,
final stress at y:

Total stress at any fiber y

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

14

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

15

University of Wisconsin

Load Balancing:

Draping strand:
Total stress at any fiber y

If the moment due prestress, (Te), is opposite in


sign to the moment created by the loading (M) the bending stresses cancel out and pure axial
compression is left.
So, want: (Te) + M = 0
or, strand eccentricity e: e = - M / T
the strand location e should vary opposite to the
moment diagram due to applied loads.

University of Wisconsin

16

For a typical moment diagram on a simply supported beam (above)


the strand should be draped as below:
side view of
beam and strand

Precasters, however, cannot obtain a curved drape in pre-tensioned beams.


The strand pattern in a precast beam is likely to look like:

Plotting the resulting moment diagrams:

There are critical locations where the moments do not cancel


and bending stresses must be controlled!

University of Wisconsin

some strands draped

others
straight
second girder

si

le
ng

rd
gi

er

University of Wisconsin

17

For a typical moment diagram on a simply supported beam (above)


the strand should be draped as below:
side view of
beam and strand

With post-tensioning:
It is easy to get the tendon in exactly the shape desired
to cancel out the bending!
A hollow duct is placed in the beam in the desired shape.
Since the tendon is not tightened yet, it doesnt try to
go into a straight line shape.

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

18

University of Wisconsin

Prestressing:
From the calculations we can see that the actual
stresses in a member can be
CONTROLLED
by adjusting the tendon location
e and the applied prestress
force T.

University of Wisconsin

19

Aim of Prestressing
control amount of tension in concrete
limit concrete tension to a level below cracking
keep uncracked cross section
moment of inertia stays = Igross
ed
crack

Igross

Igross

University of Wisconsin

Why use post tensioning?


durability / crackfree
stiffness / crackfree
allows longer spans
can possibly reduce substructures/piers
lower maintenance
elimination of joints
University of Wisconsin

20

summary
pretension & post-tension .

both create prestress,

-- pretension in precasting plant,


-- post-tension at job site,

post-tensioning .

can exactly cancel out the bending effect


from loads,

aim to prevent cracking: increased I allows


spanning longer distances,
better durability;
University of Wisconsin

Purpose of Workshop
what is post-tensioning?

PROGRAM: - best situations for using P/T


DESIGN: - special designs steps
CONSTRUCTION: - components and use

University of Wisconsin

21

How is P/T Applied?

University of Wisconsin

feed strands through duct,


place anchor head and wedges

anchor casting
embedded in
concrete

University of Wisconsin

figures from VSL Inc.

22

jack & anchor head

University of Wisconsin

anchor head
(bears on anchor
casting)

wedges
seated in
conical holes

University of Wisconsin

23

place jack feed strands thru


over anchor head and wedges

University of Wisconsin

figures from VSL Inc.

jack pulls set of strands


second head and wedges
grip strands here

University of Wisconsin

figures from VSL Inc.

24

jack pulls set of strands

University of Wisconsin

figures from VSL Inc.

extended strands are locked in position

after strands are pulled


(to desired force/elongation)

mix grout and pump grout


into duct to protect strand

2nd jack pushes against wedges


anchoring strands against head
---- then main jack is released
University of Wisconsin

figures from VSL Inc.

25

alternate to strand
pull bar with jack,
tighten nut in place

bearing plate applies


compression to concrete

University of Wisconsin

figures from DSI

when to use
CRACKING -- possible situation where
cracking might develop and
affect:
durability, or
performance

University of Wisconsin

26

ideal application of post-tensioning with bars

University of Wisconsin

plan from WisDOT

target piers

University of Wisconsin

plan from WisDOT

27

section BB

University of Wisconsin

plan from WisDOT

Section
BB

36 - #11
epoxy
coated
rebar

University of Wisconsin

plan from WisDOT

28

girder

girder
GIRDER 4

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

29

Girder 4

Girder 3

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

30

Between 2 & 3

University of Wisconsin

pier
deflection

Cracking:
due to weight of girders alone
(deck not formed or poured)

University of Wisconsin

31

6-8 above footing

University of Wisconsin

10-11 above footing

University of Wisconsin

32

cracking =
reduced moment of inertia &
increased deflections

pier cracking
additional softening and deflection

University of Wisconsin

cracking =
reduced moment of inertia &
increased deflections

deflection (inch)

pier 2 deflections
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
-1.4

measured
cracked sub

100

200

300

400

distance from end of cap (inch)

1.2 end deflection

University of Wisconsin

33

thread bars
live end
jacking

dead end
embedded
anchor

36 - #11
epoxy
coated
rebar
post-tension
to prevent
cracking

Replace 36 - #11 bars


with
20 1.25 threadbar
no cracking
much more efficient

dead end
embedded
anchor

University of Wisconsin

Other Prime Applications


Brady Street Bridge: pedestrian pathway on Milw lakeshore

LONG SPAN
125 ft center span eliminated need for a midspan pier
5 tendons, each with nine 0.6 strands

University of Wisconsin

from ASPIRE W2007

34

Lakeshore State Park Bridge - near Milw lakeshore

University of Wisconsin

from AECOM

University of Wisconsin

from AECOM

35

University of Wisconsin

from AECOM

MUST HAVE:
vent tubes
at high point
to allow air
escape as
grout is
pumped in

University of Wisconsin

from AECOM

36

feed strand through ducts


1. strand spool
3. into duct

University of Wisconsin

2. feeder

from AECOM

anchor head
& wedges

University of Wisconsin

from AECOM

37

grout vents

grout
tubes

University of Wisconsin

from AECOM

University of Wisconsin

38

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

EXAMPLE
Bridge Design
&
Construction Controls

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

Spliced Girder Bridge

using precast girders


to allow long span construction
to improve long term durability
to simplify transport of girders

University of Wisconsin

Florida - Choctawhatchee Bay

Spliced girders

Cantilevered
girders

post-ten ducts
PCI J V38, N4

back span support

LONG SPAN POSSIBILITIES


University of Wisconsin

Florida - Choctawhatchee Bay

Spliced girders

drop-in span
girder

PCI J V38, N4

tapered cantilever girder

University of Wisconsin

Spliced girders

I-15
Salt Lake City

Ascent, Sp 99

over 200 ft.


span
Ascent, Sp 99

University of Wisconsin

Spliced girders

Rock Cut Bridge, Washington

Ascent, F 97

University of Wisconsin

Spliced girders

Ascent, F 97

Rock Cut Bridge, three 63, 40 ton girders spliced for 190 span
University of Wisconsin

Spliced girders

eliminated a
center pier
in stream bed

University of Wisconsin

Twist bridge, Washington


176 span, 95 girder

Spliced girders

Methow River, WA, double 180 spans, 83 girder


University of Wisconsin

Spliced girders

PCI Journal Nov-Dec 06

Nebraska Bridge: 207 ft. span, 79 I-girders

University of Wisconsin

Nebraska Bridge: 207 ft. span, 79 I-girders

Spliced girders

PCI Journal Nov-Dec 06

University of Wisconsin

Nebraska Bridge: 207 ft. span, 79 I-girders

Spliced girders

PCI Journal Nov-Dec 06

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

splicing girders is particularly effective if:

1. it is possible to completely eliminate


a middle pier by using long spans ($$$)
2. it makes shipping long span girders possible

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

design & construction problem:

University of Wisconsin

-- a single 180ft girder weighs 92 tons


-- a 180 ft. length is difficulty to
transport around turns in a road

University of Wisconsin

Temporary bents - support girders

joints
filled
when
decked

University of Wisconsin

Spliced girders

I-15
Salt Lake City

temporary const.
supports at
splice points

Ascent, Sp 99

3 95 precast girders spliced for a single span over 200

University of Wisconsin

Alternate to temporary supports:

University of Wisconsin

Alternate to temporary supports:

post-tension

decking

University of Wisconsin

Alternate to temporary supports:

girder hangs from steel


strut beam

suspended girder

University of Wisconsin

10

Alternate to temporary supports:

University of Wisconsin

Alternate to temporary supports:

good for situations where


P/T is applied before deck
is placed
(then deck has no prestress)

temp supports struts:

1. capacity to carry beam + deck?


2. interfere with deck placement

University of Wisconsin

11

after deck and joints are placed:


post-tension strands are fed through ducts

University of Wisconsin

** the deck is prestressed with the girders:


we cant easily rip it off and replace it in 20 years,
make provision for an overlay in design loads
(similar to method used in segmental box bridges)

University of Wisconsin

12

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

13

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

14

University of Wisconsin

FOR DESIGN:

analyze this structure


with girder and deck weight

(solve for internal moments and


initial locked-in stresses in girder)
girder carries all load, deck is wet
University of Wisconsin

15

FOR DESIGN: all loads that are applied


after the deck has hardened
and P/T applied create moments in this two span
continuous composite beam
University of Wisconsin

Construction Sequence:

the construction sequence


directly affects the design process
University of Wisconsin

16

Design Process:

the design process shown


here follows
the same steps as
shown in WBM
design of W72 beam
in Chapter 19

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

17

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

18

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

19

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

20

after deck and joints are placed:


post-tension strands are fed through ducts

then tendons are pulled with the jack


- tendency is for strand to straighten
post-tensioning lifts girders off temp supports!

University of Wisconsin

simulate the effect of temporary


support removal
by applying reverse loads

University of Wisconsin

21

temp support moment


4000
3000

1000
0
0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-1000
-2000
-3000

moments from
removal of
temporary supports
(reaction gone)

-4000
-5000
-6000
distance (ft)
actual int

actual ext

University of Wisconsin

Moment from Girder and Deck


(on temporary supports)
3500
3000

moment (kip-ft)

2500

temp
bent
reaction
on girder

2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

-1000
-1500

distance (feet)

temp support moment


4000

moment (ft-kip)

moment (ft-kip)

2000

2000
0
0

50

100

150

-2000
-4000
-6000

distance (ft)
unit load

actual int

actual ext

University of Wisconsin

22

Service 1 Moment due DL on non-composite girder

Service 1 DL M on composite girder

3500

4000

3000
2000

2500

moment (kip-ft)

1500
1000
500
0
-500

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0
0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-2000

-4000

180
-6000

-1000
-1500

-8000
Service 1 Total DL
M

distance (feet)

distance (feet)

8000
6000
4000

moment (kip-ft)

moment (kip-ft)

2000

2000
0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-2000
-4000
-6000
-8000

University of Wisconsin

distance (feet)

University of Wisconsin

23

How to approach the design? where to start

University of Wisconsin

se
g ca n
n
i
l
l
ro
io
cont retens
for p esign
d
pretension in girders only needs to be
sufficient to carry girder and deck
weight on the initial short temp spans!

University of Wisconsin

24

:
case l
s
i
h
kt
t ro
chec ly to con
ik e
not l design

University of Wisconsin

l l be
this wi case
lling
contro design
f or P / T
cracking in deck over pier (-M)
& comp in bottom flange at pier

University of Wisconsin

25

summary design approach:

design pre-tension to eliminate


cracking of girders when simply
supported, girder + deck weight

design P/T to avoid tension in deck


over top of pier

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

26

University of Wisconsin

Temporary bents - support girders

concrete deck is placed

Temporary bents - support girders and deck


University of Wisconsin

27

girder weight plus concrete deck

non-composite girders
4000

before
deck is
hardened
weight is
carried by
girders
(non-composite)

3500

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

-1000

distance (ft)
interior

exterior

University of Wisconsin

girder weight plus concrete deck

non-composite girders
4000
3500
3000

moment (kip-ft)

moment (kip-ft)

3000

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

-1000

distance (ft)

University of Wisconsin

interior

exterior

28

girder weight plus concrete deck

Initial Stresses due Non-Comp. DL


(without pretension)
2

stress (ksi)

1.5
1
0.5
0
-0.5

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-1
-1.5
-2

distance (ft)
top

bottom

ten allow

high tension on bottom is unacceptable = cracking


University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

29

e approx.
Note: dont us
in WBM,
as
on
loss equati
)
losses (75yrs
overestimates

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

30

ksi
1.266 d
e
d
e
ne

University of Wisconsin

girder weight plus concrete deck

pre-tensioned

Temp: Girder and Deck Weight Initial Stresses


(with pretension)
2

stress (ksi)

1.5
1
0.5
0
0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-0.5
-1

distance (ft)
top

bottom

ten allow

bottom tension is acceptable = no cracking


University of Wisconsin

31

girder weight plus concrete deck

non-composite girders
4000
3500

moment (kip-ft)

3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

-1000

distance (ft)

University of Wisconsin

interior

exterior

IF - the girder is lifted


at its ends:
high bending at middle
would require bottom
pre-tension

moment diagram

BUT: later on with


full loading on the
structure the M over
the pier will create
high compression at bottom
- dont want comp. at bottom
from pre-tension -

University of Wisconsin

32

IF - the girder is lifted


at its ends:

moment diagram

University of Wisconsin

moment diagram
equal +M an M
both smaller

University of Wisconsin

33

Pre-tension design

Summary:
the 2 end span girders have 12 strands
for pre-tension at the bottom;
the middle span girder does not
require any pre-tension;

University of Wisconsin

Post-tension Design

University of Wisconsin

34

Note:
with W82 girder
web is 6.5 wide,
3.4 duct is largest
to fit!! limit ~ 12 strands
University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

35

ducts over pier


girder end - anchorages

University of Wisconsin

note:
the e is less than the kern,
that means that the P/T will cause compression
at the bottom of the beam, the pier moments will also!

University of Wisconsin

36

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

37

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning

University of Wisconsin

38

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning

University of Wisconsin

39

Post-Tensioning

University of Wisconsin

unit load

225k
moment diagram

A tendon that was in the exact shape of


the moment diagram shown is concordant.
BUT - there is a big kink over the pier

University of Wisconsin

40

unit load

225k
Need to eliminate the 225k reaction:

University of Wisconsin

unit load

upward 6.25k/ft
moments
4000

moment (ft-k)

3000
2000
1000
0
-1000 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

-2000
-3000

distance

resulting moment diagram

University of Wisconsin

41

tendon profile
40

inches

20
+18.4 in.

0
-20

-13.2 in.

-40
-60
-80 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

250

300

350

distance (ft)

University of Wisconsin

tendon profile
40

inches

20
+18.4 in.

0
-20

-13.2 in.

-40
-60
-80 0

50

100

150

200

distance (ft)

University of Wisconsin

42

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

43

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

44

18ft

162ft

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

45

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

46

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

47

stress (ksi)

jack at
this end

Tendon Stress
(with friction loss)

215

100

210

80

205

60

200

40

195

20

190

185
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

-20
360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

48

Friction loss

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

49

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

50

Tendon Stress
(with friction loss)
100

215

--- sl

stress (ksi)

210

ope
---

80

205

60

200

40

195

20

190

185
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

-20
360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

Tendon Stress

stress (ksi)

(with friction loss)

215

100

210

80

205

60

200

40

195

20

190

0
-20

185
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

51

Tendon Stress

stress (ksi)

(with friction loss)

215

100

210

80

205

60

200

40

195

20

190

185

-20
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

Tendon Stress

stress (ksi)

(with friction loss)

215

100

210

80

205

60

200

40

195

20

190

185

-20
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

52

Tendon Stress
210

100

205

80

200 ksi allowed


max stress

200

60
40

195

20
190

0
-20

185
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

Tendon Stress
(with friction and seating loss)
100

210

80

205

stress (ksi)

stress (ksi)

(with friction and seating loss)

200 ksi allowed max stress

200

60
40

195

20
190

0
-20

185
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

53

University of Wisconsin

Tendon Stress
(with friction and seating loss)
100

210

80

ra
e xt s e
a
e
rel

stress (ksi)

205

200 ksi allowed max stress

200

move
down

60
40

195

20
190

0
-20

185
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

54

University of Wisconsin

Adjusted Tendon Stress


(with initial release, friction, seating and all time dependent loss)
198

100

196

80

stress (ksi)

194

60

192
40
190
20

188

186

-20

184
0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

360

distance (ft)
tendon stress

tendon profile

University of Wisconsin

55

University of Wisconsin

Elevation at beam end:

University of Wisconsin

56

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

57

733.9
328.7
Tpt0
590.3

442.3

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

58

STRUTS:

University of Wisconsin

Add ties:

University of Wisconsin

59

Add secondary members triangulation:

University of Wisconsin

Co-ords for computer model:

University of Wisconsin

60

University of Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin

61

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

EXAMPLE
Bridge Design
&
Construction Controls

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

OTHER DESIGNS

University of Wisconsin

62

Multi Span Slab Bridges:

University of Wisconsin

Multi Span Slab Bridges:

longitudinal reinforcing
is replaced with post-tensioning

ducts

University of Wisconsin

63

with P/T:

length of middle span can be extended as


long as 80-90ft.

piers can be moved from in water to stream sides


University of Wisconsin

Same design process is used:


1. find maximum eccentricity for tendon at critical section
2. solve for prestress force needed at that section
3. find a concordant tendon layout using a M diagram shape
University of Wisconsin

64

Simpler than previous example:


no need for temporary supports;
no pretensioning combined with P/T;
no variation between non-composite
and composite sections;

University of Wisconsin

Post-Tensioning Bridge Workshop

P/T Concepts

University of Wisconsin

65

You might also like