Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bullion Beck Headframe HAER Plus Extras
Bullion Beck Headframe HAER Plus Extras
UT-46
Tintic Mining Distriot
Eureka
Juab county
Utah
•••
PHOTOGRAPHS
WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA
•
!-litER
UTAH
I a.- ElA It? )
NOTE: Photographs No. UT-46-1 through UT-46-4 were taken by John A. Senulis on
August 11, 1986, and are on 2-1/4 x 2-1/4-inch format film.
Photographs No. UT-46-5 through UT-46-9 are photocopies of 22x36-inch
mylars of architectural features prepared by Allen D. Roberts of
Cooper/Roberts, Architects & Assoc. A.I.A., 202 West 300 North, Salt
Lake City, Utah 84103.
•
HAEf<,
UT/iH
1"l-r.::Uo
cJ.... ~~- f'\. I
,-----------------------------,-------- -------'--
• Bullion Beck and Champion Mine,
Headframe
HAER No. UT-46
(Page 2)
Mineral exploration has always been an important theme in the history of the
United states. The Federal Government, as early as 1785, reserved one-third
of the mineral reSOurces on Federal land. This did not prove workable and was
repealed in the early nineteenth century. The discovery of gold in 1848 at
Sutter's Millon the American River in California was one of the main events
stimulating the development of a mineral industry in the United states.
People flocked to California in hopes of making their fortunes. The surface
gold, obtainable by placer mining, soon ran out, and deep mining, which
required large amounts of capital, soon become dominant. The many prospectors
drawn by the California Strike either became employees of the large mining
companies or spread throughout the West in search of other major claims.
Their efforts in the period from 1850 to 1875 located most of the major
resources and set the stage for the development of the western mineral
industry (Notarianni: 1982).
Utah's role in the mineral industry was slow to develop because of the
•
opposition of Brigham Young and other Mormon leaders who did not want to open
the state to outsiders (Arrington: 1963). Other causes that delayed
development, specifically in the Tintic area, included a hostile Ute Indian
presence under the leadership of Chief Tintic, for whom the area is named
(Harris: 1961).
The true development of the mineral industry in Utah coincides with the
development of the transcontinental railroad in 1869. In 1870, the Union
Pacific Railroad, in need of coal for its operation, opened mines in Green
River and Rock Springs, Wyoming, and in 1874 in Coalville, Utah. The Union
Pacific Railroad, which generally followed the route of modern-day interstates
80 and 84 into Ogden, Utah, had easy access from its mines to the urban market
of the Salt Lake Valley.
In an attempt to break the coal monopoly held in Salt Lake City by the Union
Pacific, the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad began a line from Denver
to Salt Lake City. Originally scheduled to run through Castle Valley and
Salina Canyon, the company revised the route of the railroad to take advantage
of the coal resources of the Wasatch Plateau (Athearn: 1962).
The Utah Southern Railroad was organized by Mormon interests to connect Salt
Lake City to Arizona. Following a pattern that had already been established,
• the railroad was constructed using Mormon labor. When completed, the stock
was acquired by the Union Pacific (Arrington: 1958). The Union Pacific
•
Bullion Beck and Champion Mine,
Headframe
HAER No. UT-46
(Page 3)
reached the Tintic area in 1882 under the name Salt Lake and West.ern Railway.
Rail service continued to develop, so t.hat by 1892 t.he Tintic area was served
by branches of both t.he Union Pacific and the Denver and Rio Grande Western
railroads (Strack, "Railroads" in Notarianni: 1982).
The Tintic Mining District encompasses an approximately eight square mile area
on the east. and west slopes of the north-south-running East Tintic Mountain
Range. The East Tintic Range is typical of the block-faulted ranges of the
Great Basin. The Tintic District is within close proximity to the Wasatch
Front valleys and major transportation arteries.
During the period of 1890 to 1926, the principal activity of the Tintic area
was gold, silver and lead mining. The area was surveyed by the Utah Historical
Society in the mid 1970s, and the Tintic Mining District was listed on the
National Register of Historic Places in March 1979 (Notarianni: 1982).
•
The history of Tintic's prominent period has been divided into four phases
(Notarianni: 1982). The first phase began in 1869 with the development of
the Sunbeam claim. The development of the Dragon, Mammoth, Eureka Hill and
Bullion Beck soon followed. The period was one of growth and development that
witnessed the establishment of the mines and smelters. The small towns of
Diamond, Mammoth, Silver City and Eureka began in close proximity to the
mining centers (Notarianni: 1982). The period ends with the introduction of
the railroad in 1878.
The second period, from 1879 to 1898, was one of industrialization and growth.
The railroads brought influxes of capital and the ability to obtain materials
for construction at much less cost. Deep mining activities began in this
period and refined smelting operations increased. The increased activity
stimulated population growth and the development of labor unions (Notarianni:
1982).
The third period, between 1899 and 1912, was a period of substantial growth.
In 1899, Tintic was the leading producer of raw and processed ore in Utah, in
the sum of $5,228,575. The Tintic District produced a total of $35,000,000
between 1870 through 1899 (Lindgren: 1919).
The final period of prominence was from 1913 to 1926. This period was one of
continued cyclical prosperity. Production peaked at $16,200,000 in 1925. The
town of Eureka grew to nearly 4,000 people, with corresponding interests in
other towns (Notarianni: 1982).
John Beck was born in the town of Aichelberg in Wurttemberg, Germany, on March
19, 1843. He joined the Mormon church in 1862, serving as a missionary to
Switzerland and Germany before immigrating to Utah in 1864 (Powell: 1984).
Beck moved from Bichfield to Lehi, Utah, engaging in farming, sheep herding,
woodcutting and charcoal making. He became somewhat prosperous and invested
$6,000 in the Eureka Hill Mine in 1810. Beck's business acumen had not yet
developed, as he lost both his money and claims to the mine through litigation
(Powell 1984). Beck quickly earned the nickname "Crazy Dutchman" when he
staked a claim in the gulch below Eureka Hill (Notarianni: 1982). His belief
that the ores would migrate downward proved to be correct, and the mine began
paying back his meager investment in rapid fashion.
•
Germans to Utah. The number of German heads of household in Eureka increased
from two in 1880 to sixty-five in 1990. Beck also established, at his own
expense, the first Latter-Day Saints church buildings in Eureka (Powell:
1984) •
The Bullion Beck and Champion Mining Company developed in an orderly fashion
until 1890 when a major expansion occurred. The Salt Lake Tribune used its
New Year's Day issue to review important developments in Utah during the past
year. The January 1, 1891, issue reviewed the important changes at the mine in
1890. The Tribune reported that:
The central support timbers for the headframe or gallows actually measure 1
foot 4-1/2 inch by 2 feet 1 inch. The four outer posts are roughly 1 foot
5 inches by 1 foot 11 inches and are embedded in concrete pads. The Tribune
goes on to report that at the other end of the building are a "Frazer and
Chalmers pair of engines of 500 horsepower each." The engines were joined on
one shaft and coupled by an elabo~ate series of clutches and brakes that
allowed the engines to operate the cable reels either separately or together.
There are also indices to show the positions of the cages. The cages were
• supported by "wide, flat steel ropes." The cages entered a double compartment
shaft with a "manway" (walkway) from top to bottom.
• Bullion Beck and Champion Mine,
Headframe
HAER No. UT-46
(Page 5)
There were other developments at the Bullion Beck and Champion Mine (commonly
called the Bullion Beck) in 1890 that were similarly impressive. The Tribune
reported the site also contained a 40-by-40-foot boiler house with two
batteries of two boilers each. The furnaces that drove the boilers had two
80-foot stacks. Other structures included a wood shop, blacksmith shop, coal
house and a 500-ton ore bin. Other facilities included a 75-light dynamo and
a 100-horsepower Rand compressor with new drills. The Tribune estimated that
the mine had sent out 25,000 tons of ore in 1890. The capacity of the new
facility would be 100 tons per day (Tribune: 1891). The mine was employing
275 men at this time.
The mine site was also expanded in 1890. The former site was 4,000 by 600
feet. New property, 5,400 by 1,500 feet, was added on the east side. The
Bullion Beck and Champion Mine also acquired the Homansville Spring and a new
water service with two storage tanks and new pipes. The Tribune noted that
the cost of the site modification was $80,000, the additional property another
$50,000, and the water works another $90,000. The Tribune proudly noted that
the Bullion Beck and Champion Mine still paid dividends of $325,000 that year.
• The final major expansion at the Bullion Beck and Champion Mine occurred in
1894, when a new mill was added. The mill covered an area 220 feet by 125
feet, with a tower that rose nearly 105 feet in the air. The water system was
also expanded at this time (Notarianni: 1982). Figure 1 is a photograph of
the completed operation about 1895.
The Bullion Beck and Champion Mine, along with the many other mines in the
Tintic Mining District, went through cyclical prosperity, labor strikes, and
other events common to the day. By 1917, the Bullion Beck and Champion Mine
hAd begun to lease parts of the interior of the mine. Prosperity began to
dwindle soon afterward and the facilities at the Bullion Beck and Champion
Mine, with the sole exception of the headframe, were demolished in 1925
(Notarianni: 1982).
While the days of prosperity would never be repeated, the Bullion Beck and
Champion Mine was brought to life again during World War II. At the beginning
of the war (around 1940), Duke Page and his partner, Brennan Hannifin, first
reopened Eureka Hill Mine, which is slightly north and east of Bullion Beck and
Champion Mine. Tests conducted by Page and Hannifin led them to move their
operation down the hill to Bullion Beck and Champion Mine. The headframe was
reused but not enclosed, although a hoist room was constructed to house the
fifty-horsepower electric motor that powered the hoist (Hannifin: 1986).
The new era of Bullion Beck and Champion Mine saw ore mined for a different
purpose. Bullion Beck and Champion ore has a high silica content which is
two leading producers of copper during the war, and Page and Hannifin were one
of their major ore suppliers. Utah produced one-third of the copper used by
the United States and its allies in World War II (Arrington: 1966). In
addition to the use of the ore for flux, secondary recovery of gold and silver
produced additional income for both the ore producer and the manufacturer
(Hannifin: 1986).
Prosperity continued through the 40s and into the 50s, stimulated by the Korean
War. The Yankee and Mammoth mines were reopened, and the Chief Consolidated
Mine continued to employ almost 100 people. The Bullion Beck and Champion Mine
was run as a father and son operation in the 50s by Brennan Hannifin, one of
the original partners, and his son, Tim (Hannifin: 1986).
• California, but high shipping charges and low ore prices made continued mining
economically unfeasible. The Bullion Beck and Champion Mine was closed in
June or July of 1960 (Hannifin: 1986).
The Tintic Mining District was nominated for and placed on the National
Register of Historic Places in 1976. The idle headframes of the Big Four
mines, as the Eureka Hill, the Bullion Beck and Champion, the Gemini and the
Centennial-Eureka are called, stand out in the landscape of the Tintic
District. They are an important visual contribution to the rich mining
history of the district.
Present-day use of the Bullion Beck and Champion m~n~ng properties now
includes grazing, historic and mining interests. United states Smelting,
Refining and Mining Company (USSRMCO) first acquired an interest in the
Bullion Beck and Champion Mine in 1917. In 1979, Sharon steel acquired the
assets of USSRMCO under the name of U.V. Industries. On February 15, 1983,
Sharon Steel entered into a land-use license for two of the Bullion Beck and
Champion's patented mining claims with the Tintic Historical Society. The
surface of these claims contains the mine's headframe. The society maintains
use of the site for locating a histcrical marker and a small parking area. On
August 1, 1985, Sharon Steel leased all of its mining claims and mill sites in
the Tintic District to Diamond Bullion Corporation for future mining
possibilities (Sadler: 1986).
Also in August of 1985, the state of Utah embarked upon an abandoned mine
reclamation project in the Tintic District. The project was aimed at
• eliminating the worst hazards of open and caving mine shafts which were closest
to the town and roads. Most of the shafts were backfilled as the preferred
• Bullion Beck and Champion Mine,
Headframe
HAER No. UT-46
(Page 7)
method of eliminating the shaft and stabilizing the collars. Several shafts
were scheduled to receive the specially-designed grid due to the lack of fill,
the need to leave the shAft venting, or for historical considerations.
Between 1980 and 1985, the cage-dumping platform on the Bullion Beck and
Champion Mine headframe deteriorated considerably. In designing the shaft
closure for the headframe, the state determined that in order to place the
grid over the shaft, the broken and listing platform would need to be
temporarily moved. The platform was to be placed on the ground next to the
headframe and rehung, if possible, or laid on top of the grid after
installation. In placing the grid, an unfortunate series of events occurred
on March 18, 1986. The skip guides of the headframe were broken and the
platform destroyed. Since this adverse effect on the head frame occurred, the
state, in consultation with Federal agencies, the Certified Local Government
of Eureka and the Tintic Historical Society, has worked cooperatively to
devise a satisfactory mitigation plan for the damage to the headframe. The
mitigation consists of four parts:
•
1. Shaft Collar Stabilization - This work consists of reconstruction of
the shaft collar and rebuilding the wooden shaft lining to a viewable
depth. Although this work cannot guarantee continued stability of
the headframe, it is of importance to the shaft collar stability.
•
• Bullion Beck and Champion Mine,
Headframe
HAER No. UT-46
(Page 8)
Arrington, Leonard J.
Athearn, Robert G.
1962 Rebel of the Rockies: The Denver and Rio Grande Western
Railroad. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Hannifin, Tim
•
1986 Personal Communication, September 1986.
1919 Geology and Ore Deposits in the Tintic Mining District, Utah.
Government Printing Office, Washington.
Notarianni, Phillip F.
1982 Faith, Hope and Prosperity: The Tintic Mining District. Tintic
Historical Society, Eureka, Utah.
Sadler, Timothy M•
DESCRIPTION OF FEATURE
General Information
I. Sources
The material used in the feature descriptions was taken from the following
data sources:
•
August 11, 1986.
II. Format
The feature has been described using a four step process as follows:
Feature Description
I. Feature
•
(estimate).
D. Headframe was constructed in 1890. Surrounding frame structure
demolished in 1925.
Bullion Beck and Champ10n M1ne, Heaarran
HAER No. UT-46
(Page 10)
•
-"~
.-::
~
.5
::0 .-
'- c
~"
c
/: ~') ~
...-- +' C
H C
<
0-.
~ ,c
'. c
'r
/:
h ~
,.
~ ......
-
~ .-...-
•
/:
-c
~ CO'
x -&tL
~
...... c
-
......
..." +3
(.: c
~
:;.: "'
./
-
. . ..
+'
.r ;..
/'
•
DOWN THB SHAPT ••• OR UP!
SILVBR AND HBRITAGB IN THB TINTIC MINING DISTRICT
The old West of prospectors, hard rock districts and towns that go
boom and bust is in the midst of another wave of change. The surge in
precious metals prices at the end of the 1970s inflationary cycle saw new
demand and new technologies appear as the old districts poised in a present
extracting a price from the past. Generally higher metals prices have
joined heap leaching and ion exchange extraction processes to cause old
mines and waste dumps to suddenly assume "ore" status in the current
economics. As seismic crews, core drillers and bulldozers lace the old
claims in search of new data, the historic fabric of interrelated elements
comprising a landscape is undergoing change.
But change is ongoing at some rate in every landscape and in the
fabulous but little known Tintic Mining District more destructive forces
than the new crop of miners have been at work. The Multiple Resource
National Register Historic District created in 1978 listed some 24 individual
sites of major significance. By 1987 of 13 listed sites that had major
structures 6 had disappeared. Dozens more that contributed to the sense of
place and past also disappeared. Many of those were more significant than
sites that were listed. A number of questions are raised by this ongoing
process and in the time available we will address some of them. First, why
have major historic sites been recognized and then destroyed and what
difference if any does their passing make?
To get a feel for the visual changes and the flavor of place involved,
we may divide the landscape into Eureka proper, other townsites, and mine
surface plants or workings. Main Street Eureka in 1986 had a neglected
but beautiful example of a commercial Victorian false front on the north
side across from the BPOE bUilding. Since most of the rows of business
buildings on that side had been razed in the previous 10 years, it was
especially striking in its isolation. It had the classic 19th-century recessed
entry with display windows and tiled floor and a corrugated roof rusted to
a mellow contrast with the backdrop earthtone hills. It was replaced with
a 1940s caboose in fresh painted Union Pacifi,c yellow and red. Next door
went a slant-wall metal prefab for the fire department. Buildings leave a
message. Post railroad era permanence was expressed in fancy brickwork
and Victorian decoration. It is difficult to retain a sense of community or
pride when structures have an air of impermanence that indicates the type
of boom or bust we currently are in.
Over the mountain in Mammoth, a miners cottage stared vacant-eyed
across a valley once filled with the modest frame dwellings of the working
man. An artist's centerpiece in autumn, by 1985 it was gone joining most
of its kin. The miner's "dry" building at the Tintic Standard had served
for years as storage for core samples after the miner's changing room need
had passed. It burned to the ground in 1986, the nefarious deed of an
arsonist. The Chief No.2 headframe over its early concrete-lined shaft was
unique in its width and number of structural members. It was bulldozed in
the early 1980s and replaced with a steel headframe. The Yankee
headframe, perched on a northeast flank of Godiva Mountain, was bulldozed
by ARCO in 1979. While no reason was given, it was apparently easier to
screen the collar for safety that way.
Fundamental philosophical questions arise in view of these changes.
Many factors operate in the destruction of historic mining sites. Hard
economic times as well as good ones, taxes, liability costs, apathy and
insensitivity are among them. In 1987 Eureka suddenly found itself a
"gateway" to the Great Basin National Park. National Parks are notorious
for attracting tourists with dollars many of whom stop and leave some of
those in historic mining districts enroute or nearby. Virginia City, Nevada
and Montana, Georgetown, Colorado and Columbia, California come to mind.
Ironically in the very same year three of Eureka's major businesses closed
and its most prominent if not most significant symbol of mining, the Bullion
Beck headframe, was being stabilized by a state agency under pressure to
reverse some of its more insensitive and illegal activites.
Those who read discover that history has a way of repeating itself.
Perhaps the best reason then for preserving some history is the time
honored dictum that a knowlege of the past can save at least some of us
from repeating some of the mistakes of the past. The preservation of
buildings, townscapes and landscapes is an evolving idea that has been
around in some form for centuries. Value in the practice is attributed to
such diverse notions as aesthetics, enlightenment and, especially in these
"cost-benefIt-ratio" times, economics. It has been well proven that in many
cases the past yields monetary as well as more intangible profits.
Sometimes only curiosity or chance operate to save places that become
appreciated in a later time.
Destruction of historic places also has many motives. Buildings as
well as books have been burned because some group or individual has
negative feelings about what a place symbolizes. Frequently the past stands
in the way of someone's view of "progress." A societal anomie and
preoccupation with materialism seem to be near the root of "tear it out"
tendencies. The physical past cannot become symbolic in the minds of its
viewers until there develops a chain of awareness, knowledge and ultimately
appreciation. The perception of what is "positive" or "negative" and to
what degree is very dependent on the viewer's frame of reference or
previous experience. Political, tax and insurance ramifications often
operate. Apathy and benign neglect are a two edged sword both preserving
and destroying.
Reasons vary then for the preservation and destruction of historic
places. The question remains, "So what?" What difference does it make
whether historic places are preserved or destroyed? The difference is far
reaching and frequently subtle. Numerous studies from urban planners and
geographers show that shape, detail, flow, sense of past and attractiveness
to pedestrians and human interaction all affect the social, psychological and
ultimately the physical well being of both people and places. Since people
tend to operate as left or right brain entities and the former dominate our
structured society of political, economic and social systems, it appears to be
an uphill battle to elevate the organization of habitat and environs to a
humane level.
Butte, Montana underwent an extensive Historic American Engineering
Record (HA ER) survey following local concerns that the adjacent open-pit
copper mine was about to swallow the town. Janet Cornish, Urban
Revitalization Agency director, said, "All of a sudden, people started getting
excited. Before, downtown had seemed an old, cumbersome area with
sentimental value and little else. Now the community saw its economic
potential, and they saw that people from outside the community were
recognizing it." (Tom Huth, "Mining in the West: Will Our Heritage Survive,"
Historic Preservation, May-June 1981 p. 15; also see USDI NPS, Butte,
Montana A Project Report, April 1981) In a materialistic world, the
survivors in the preservation game soon discovered that an economic appeal
based on well substantiated facts was their best approach. The modus
operandi became simply "show 'em how it makes 'em money!"
Of the many reasons for preserving mining history in Eureka and the
Tintic, the best may be economic and historical. Economic because if the
town's depressed economy is ever to achieve a degree of revival and
stability, the traveler's interest in mining history and not the boom and
bust mining economy itself will provide it. The district by accident of
unpopularity and neglect maintained a range of mining, commercial and
residential structures unexcelled in Utah and most of the West. The raw
material was and may still be there, but lacking is a view of Tintic's place
in the scope of Western mining history, a vision of the district's potential
and a commitment to plan, execute and "do it right." The historical
rationale is based on the townscape and the array of headframes and
surface plants that survive here compared to other districts that now "sell
history" with much less of the authentic to show.
Even building on your best bet, the material culture landscape of
mining past, does not go unopposed. Philosophies of preservation vary as
much as human beings. Some prefer to see the district remain a quiet rural
retreat and personal playground. Some still carry that old West frontier
notion transposed, "the only good planner is a dead planner." Personal
rights remain viscerally more important than public ones especially when it
comes to property. Opposition also comes as an outgrowth of the
automobile and mass communications. The locals can drive out and tune in
to get what they want out of town, and the out-of-towners can commute to
work the mines during the next mineral boom. These songs are replayed
across rural America.
The preservation ethic did not win the West, Manifest Destiny did.
There remains a refreshing lack of realization that the frontier era is over.
That can be a very appealing force to urbanites, tourists and other
outsiders. It also points to the paradoxes pervading the story of
preservation in Western mining districts. One federal and state tier of
bureaucracy labors to interpret and save our past so that we can
understand and appreciate it. Another layer of federal and state agencies
operating from the other side of the brain accidentally and on purpose
destroy the same past under a relatively legitimate mandate to protect the
public from hazards. One mining company bulldozes headframes and
business blocks in a twinge of liability consciousness and tax reduction.
Another opens a historic tunnel to tours and yet another shares its
extensive historic research with interested historical societies. Some people
bought locally, even if it cost a few dollars more, and others awaited the
trek to the valley to shop. Now there is little option. Some are sensitive
to commercial facades and paint schemes while others "don't give a damn."
Individualism, at least, is alive and well in the Tintic!
Paradox also appears in other districts. Robert Hope, Australian
president of Denver-based Houston International Minerals Corporation,
acknowledges both past mistakes and the inevitability of conflict at their
Virgina City, Nevada operation. "We should have let the community know
what we were doing; now we're being more up front, and I think we're
being accepted as responsible corporate citizens." After a $78,000
contribution to a historic district survey he said, "We were paying for
information--we wanted to see what is really there. To some extent,
people perceive value where we don't. Obviously we can't preserve every
building." (Huth, 1981)
Perhaps more pressing than the direct mining impacts on past mining
landscapes (to a degree natural and evolutionary) are the indirect or
secondary effects of the recent mining and energy booms. A new mine or
leach field or seismic survey is much less destructive than the associated
influx of people with a vandal mentality and no roots in or appreciation of
the local community and its history. Denice Wheeler, secretary of the
Uinta County Historical Society in oil boom Evanston, Wyoming, summed up
the flip side of the newcomer-oldtimer influence this way. "The new people
in town have become extremely interested in our history. People who've
lived here all their lives become sort of immune to their heritage ••••" (Huth,
1981)
The Utah Abandoned Mine Reclamation (AMR) Program is the agency responsible for reclaiming
abandoned mines in Utah under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA, P.L.
95-87). It is almost axiomatic that abandoned mines date from the historic era, and many abandoned
mines were significant in the development of the state. SMCRA's goals of eliminating safety hazards and
environmental problems sometimes are at odds with the preservation goals of the Historic Preservation
Act. The Bullion Beck headframe fire incident shows that the needs of both acts can be met. The
Bullion Beck headframe is a National Register site that was inadvertently damaged during a reclamation
project. This report will show how a severe, but unanticipated, adverse effect was mitigated.
The Bullion Beck headframe is located in Eureka, Utah, about fifty miles southwest of Salt Lake City.
Eureka is one of several hardrock mining boom towns that sprang up in the Tintic Mountains in the late
1800s. It still survives today with a population of 700.
The Bullion Beck and Champion Mining Company was started by John Beck, a German immigrant who
started mining in Utah in 1870. After several failures he struck valuable ore and became very wealthy.
The mine went through a major capital development phase in 1890, when a structure housing the shaft,
headframe, hoist, boilers, and shops was built. The mine declined during World War I, and in 1925 the
exterior structure was torn down for salvage, leaving the exposed headframe. The mine was revived in
1940 under new ownership, using the original headframe and a new hoist. It continued to operate until
1960.
The Bullion Beck headframe is an A-type (also known as a 2-post or Montana) headframe constructed
in 1890 of massive wooden timbers. It is 67 feet by 32 feet by 56 feet high. It stands over a shaft 1200-
1500 feet deep. The shaft has two four-foot square compartments for skips and a smaller manway.
Three vertical timbers extend from the top of the headframe down into the shaft to quide the skips as
they travel. Significant to the story, but not apparent to observers or from photographs, is the below-
ground structure. The primary support for the headframe is not concrete footers, but wooden beams and
cribbing buried in the fill around the shaft. The headframe was listed on the National Register of
Historic Places in 1976, along with the three other headframes remaining in Eureka. The Utah State
Historical Society erected a commemorative marker on the site and put chain link fencing around the
shaft.
The condition of the headframe steadily deteriorated after its abandonment. Two platforms, one where
ore was dumped from the skips and one by the sheave wheels, fell and hung swinging in the breeze. The
unconsolidated material around the shaft collar sloughed outside the wooden sheathing supporting the
sides of the shaft. The sloughing extended past the fencing placed by the historical society, so that it was
possible to stand outside the fence and fall into the shaft.
These conditions led the AMR program to include the Bullion Beck headframe in a 1985 project to
address hazards at 24 shafts and two adits in the town of Eureka. Most of the mine openings were
backfilled; four shafts, including the Bullion Beck, were to be closed with a steel grate. The grate is
made of 1/4-inch steel rod woven like a chain link fence held by I-beam supports and soil anchors. The
plan was to work around the skip guides and to move the wood in the shaft only to the extent necessary
to install the grate. After getting the necessary approvals and putting precautionary language in the
construction specifications, the project was bid and work began in the fall of 1985.
The project proceeded well until late March 19~6, when the contractor moved onto the Bullion Beck site.
Working ahead of schedule and without AMR program supervision (both in breach of the contract), the
contractor broke the skip guides and other wooden structural members with a backhoe. These fell into
the shaft and lodged on square sets in the shaft. Unable to remove them, he burned them. The wooden
collar and the buried wooden supporting members were damaged and the parts that had fallen into the
85
shaft were destroyed. Fortunately, the aboveground structure was not damaged by the fire. However,
the upper parts of the skip guides were left dangling with ragged ends.
In response to the incident, the AMR program met and worked with the State Historic Preservation
Office, the Tintic Historic Society (representing the Certified Local Government), the U.S. Office of
Surface Mining, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to see what could be done to mitigate
the damage. An engineering study determined that the loss of the collar could lead to continued
sloughing of the shaft and ultimately the structural failure of the headframe. With this in mind a four-
part mitigation plan was developed:
The public interpretation would take the form of a monument with an interpretive plaque at the
headframe and an interpretive pamphlet for distribution at the Tintic Museum in Eure~a.
Bullion Beck headframe, Eureka, Utah. (Built 1890, photo taken in 1977). Photo courtesy of J. Chris
Rohrer.
86
The HAER documentation and collar stabilization were completed in the fall of 1986. To stabilize the
collar, the shaft was cleared and a reinforced concrete slab floor was cast twenty feet down the shaft.
Reinforced concrete walls were then cast to support the sides of the shaft. The excavation outside the
walls was then backfilled. Timber sets and lagging were placed over the concrete walls to recreate the
original shaft appearance. A steel safety grid over the opening prevents anyone from falling in but
permits viewing down the shaft. In the summer of 1987 the broken skip guides were spliced with
matching timbers and extended to ground level. A stone monument with interpretive plaque was built
at the same time. The interpretive pamphlet has been written and will soon be printed.
87