Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aerodynamics Lab 3 Direct Measurements of Airfoil Lift and Drag
Aerodynamics Lab 3 Direct Measurements of Airfoil Lift and Drag
David Clark
Group 1
MAE 449 Aerospace Laboratory
Abstract
The characterization of lift an airfoil can generate is an important process in the field of
aerodynamics. The following exercise studies a NACA 0012 airfoil with a chord of 4 inches. By varying
the angle of attack at a known Reynolds number, the lift coefficient, Cl, can be determined by using a
two-component dynamometer. Normalizing the lift and drag forces against the reference area, as well
as correcting for some disturbances due to the experiment setup. The lift and drag coefficient calculated
using this setup is less accurate than previous methods.
2|Page
Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 2
Introduction and Background................................................................................................................. 4
Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 4
Governing Equations .......................................................................................................................... 4
Similarity ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Boundary Corrections ......................................................................................................................... 5
Equipment and Procedure ..................................................................................................................... 7
Equipment .......................................................................................................................................... 7
Experiment Setup ............................................................................................................................... 7
Basic Procedure .................................................................................................................................. 8
Data, Calculations, and Analysis ............................................................................................................. 8
Raw Data ............................................................................................................................................ 8
Preliminary Calculations ..................................................................................................................... 9
Results .................................................................................................................................................. 13
Discussion and Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 16
References ............................................................................................................................................ 17
Raw Data .............................................................................................................................................. 17
3|Page
1
2
Equation 1
where F is either the lift or drag forces, AREF is a specified reference area, is the density of the fluid, and
V is the net velocity experienced by the object.
Governing Equations
To assist in determining the properties of the working fluid, air, several proven governing
equations can be used, including the ideal gas law, Sutherlands viscosity correlation, and Bernoullis
equation. These relationships are valid for steady, incompressible, irrotational flow at nominal
temperatures with negligible body forces.
The ideal gas law can be used to relate the following
=
Equation 2
where p is the pressure of the fluid, R is the universal gas constant (287 J/(kg K)), and T is the
temperature of the gas. This expression establishes the relationship between the three properties of air
that are of interest for use in this experiment.
4|Page
Another parameter needed is the viscosity of the working fluid. Sutherlands viscosity
correlation is readily available for the testing conditions and can be expressed as
=
1+
Equation 3
Similarity
Using the previous governing equations, we can use the Reynolds number. The Reynolds
number is important because it allows the results obtained in this laboratory procedure to be scaled to
larger scenarios. The Reynolds number can be expressed as
=
Equation 5
where c is a characteristic dimension of the body. For a cylinder, this dimension will be the diameter. As
a result, the Reynolds number based on diameter is referenced as ReD.
Boundary Corrections
The following experiment must consider three different corrections due to the setup of the
tunnel section.
First, the squeezing of the inviscid flow causes the streamlines to flatten and push toward the
center of the test section. This effect is referred to as horizontal buoyancy. To correct for this effect, the
following expressions can be defined.
=
Equation 6
5|Page
48
Equation 7
Like the previous correction, simple expressions have been derived to adjust the parameters.
=
Equation 8
0.96
Equation 9
= +
Equation 10
Equation 11
Though some parameters have already been defined, the corrections for blockage introduce the
following parameters.
Finally, the last set of expressions corrects for the presence of the floor and ceiling within the
wind tunnel.
=
57.3
+ 3
2
Equation 12
6|Page
, =
Equation 13
1
, = ,
4
Equation 14
where
A transversing mechanism to move the pitot tube to various sections of the test section
A Pitot-static probe
Experiment Setup
Before beginning, the pressure and temperature of laboratory testing conditions was measured and
recorded. Using equations 2 and 3, the density and viscosity of the air was calculated.
The UAH wind tunnel contains cutouts to allow the NACA airfoil to be mounted inside the test
section. The two-component dynamometer can measure the force exerted perpendicular and parallel to
the airflow, which represent the lift and drag respectively.
7|Page
Basic Procedure
To ensure the working flow is relatively laminar and within a range acceptable for study, the
procedure initiated flow with a Reynolds number of 250,000. The velocity at which the laboratory air
must be accelerated was determined by solving equation 5 for velocity. First, the density and viscosity of
the air must be calculated using equations 2 and 3 respectively.
Using the DAQ hardware, the lift and drag at each angle of attack and specified dynamic pressure
was recorded.
8|Page
Data Set 1
Angle
-4
-2
-0.25
2
4
6
8
10
12
Dynamic Pressure
868
868
867
865
866
867
864
868
867
Angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Dynamic Pressure
869
868
868
867
868
868
869
867
868
Lift
-2.50
-0.65
1.32
2.41
5.77
8.58
9.92
10.90
8.10
Drag
-0.51
-0.43
-0.28
-0.35
-0.42
-0.54
-0.63
-0.75
-2.95
Lift
1.35
1.50
3.48
5.83
7.18
8.49
9.23
10.97
8.17
Drag
-0.40
-0.38
-0.41
-0.44
-0.50
-0.57
-0.58
-0.77
-2.99
Lift
1.35
1.43
3.03
4.25
5.95
8.43
10.05
10.75
9.30
Drag
-0.38
-0.40
-0.40
-0.42
-0.45
-0.56
-0.67
-0.75
-2.35
Data Set 2
Data Set 3
Angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Dynamic Pressure
867
868
866
867
867
868
867
867
868
Table 1
Preliminary Calculations
First, the density and viscosity of the air at laboratory conditions was calculated. This can easily be
accomplished using equation 2 and 3.
=
99.1
=
= 1.1660
287 296.15
Equation 15
9|Page
. 1.827 10 . 296.15
=
= 1.83 10
=
110.4
1+
1+
296.15
Equation 16
For a Reynolds number of 250,000, the velocity of the airflow must therefore be
=
=
250000 1.83 10
1.1660
0.1016 10
= 38.57
Equation 17
This value is determined using the definition of the Reynolds number where c, the reference length, is
the known value of the chord, 0.1016 meters. For reference, the value for q can be calculated as
1
1
= = 1.1660 38.57 = 867.37
2
2
Equation 18
All three data sets can be combined by averaging the three records for each angle.
Averaged Data
Angle
-4
-2
-0.25
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Lift
0.0667
0.7600
1.3200
3.2550
4.1633
6.3000
8.5000
9.7333
10.8733
8.5233
Drag
-0.4300
-0.4033
-0.2800
-0.4050
-0.4033
-0.4567
-0.5567
-0.6267
-0.7567
-2.7633
Table 2
The lift and drag can be used in equation one to determine the lift and drag coefficients. For
example, for -4 degrees angle of attack
=
0.0667
=
= 0.0025
1
1
2
1.660 38.57 0.03064
2
Equation 19
10 | P a g e
0.4300
=
= 0.0162
1
1
1.660 38.57 0.03064
2
Equation 20
Below is a table of the lift and drag coefficients. These lift coefficients must be corrected for the
three corrections mentioned previously.
Averaged Data
Angle
-4
-2
-0.25
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Lift Coefficient
0.0025
0.0286
0.0497
0.1225
0.1567
0.2371
0.3198
0.3662
0.4091
0.3207
Drag Coefficient
0.0162
0.0152
0.0105
0.0152
0.0152
0.0172
0.0209
0.0236
0.0285
0.1040
Table 3
To begin correcting for horizontal buoyancy, the following parameters need to be calculated.
=
0.1016
=
= 0.0228
48
48 0.3048
Equation 21
60.3048
0.30.0228 120.3 = 0.1463
Equation 22
0.96 0.965.96 10
=
= 2.021 10
0.0929 /
/
Equation 24
11 | P a g e
The correction parameters wb, sc, Clsc, and Cmc/4sc are calculated on the fly for each angle since
these expressions utilize the uncorrected lift and drag coefficient, which varies for each angle of attack.
For example, for 0 degrees angle of attack
=
/
0.1016/0.3048
0.0152 = 0.0013
=
4
4
Equation 26
, = = 0.02280.1225 = 0.0028
Equation 27
1
1
, , = , = 0.0028 = 0.0007
4
4
Equation 28
To further demonstrate the usage of the correction factors above, the parameters for the zero
angle of attack will all be calculated.
= 1 + + = 38.56
Equation 29
= +
57.3
57.30.0228
+ 4, , = 0 +
0.1225 + 40.0007 = 0.03
2
2
Equation 32
0.4050 0.1463
=
= 0.0208
8670.0306
Equation 33
12 | P a g e
Results
Using the same procedure outlined above, the following table catalogs all the parameters used in
calculating the corrected lift and drag coefficient.
Correction Calculation Summary
Uncorrected Data
Experimental
Angle of Attack
-4
-2
-0.25
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Average
Dynamic
Pressure
868.0
868.0
867.0
867.0
866.3
867.0
867.7
866.7
867.3
867.7
Experimental
Angle of Attack
-4
-2
-0.25
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
,wb
0.0013
0.0013
0.0009
0.0013
0.0013
0.0014
0.0017
0.0020
0.0024
0.0087
Experimental
Angle of Attack
-4
-2
-0.25
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Corrected Angle
of Attack
-4.00
-1.99
-0.24
0.03
2.03
4.05
6.07
8.08
10.09
12.07
Reynolds Number
Velocity
250091
38.59
250091
38.59
249947
38.56
249947
38.56
249850
38.55
249947
38.56
250043
38.58
249898
38.56
249995
38.57
250043
38.58
Corrected Data / Correction Factors
Corrected Dynamic Corrected Reynolds
Pressure
Number
885.75
252647
885.60
252626
883.91
252384
884.59
252482
883.90
252384
884.87
252523
886.10
252698
885.46
252607
886.84
252806
898.10
254428
Corrected Data / Correction Factors
Cm,c/4,sc
0.0000
0.0002
0.0003
0.0007
0.0009
0.0014
0.0018
0.0021
0.0023
0.0018
Cl
0.0024
0.0274
0.0476
0.1172
0.1499
0.2268
0.3057
0.3499
0.3906
0.3021
Lift
Coefficient
0.0025
0.0286
0.0497
0.1225
0.1567
0.2371
0.3198
0.3662
0.4091
0.3207
Drag
Coefficient
0.0162
0.0152
0.0105
0.0152
0.0152
0.0172
0.0209
0.0236
0.0285
0.1040
Corrected
Velocity
38.98
38.98
38.94
38.96
38.94
38.96
38.99
38.97
39.01
39.26
Cl,sc
-0.0001
-0.0007
-0.0011
-0.0028
-0.0036
-0.0054
-0.0073
-0.0084
-0.0093
-0.0073
Cdu
0.0107
0.0097
0.0050
0.0097
0.0097
0.0117
0.0154
0.0181
0.0230
0.0984
Cd
0.0104
0.0094
0.0049
0.0095
0.0094
0.0113
0.0150
0.0175
0.0222
0.0941
Table 4
13 | P a g e
2.5000
2.0000
Xfoil Results
NACA Data (Re=130000)
1.5000
Cl
1.0000
0.5000
0.0000
-4.00
-2.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
-0.5000
Angle of Attack (Degrees)
Figure 1
Figure 1 contains the various lift coefficients versus angle of attack for all the methods described
previously, as well as the previous lab session.
14 | P a g e
0.0400
0.0350
Xcode Results
NACA 0012 (Re=170000)
0.0300
Cd
0.0250
0.0200
0.0150
0.0100
0.0050
0.0000
-4.00
-2.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
Angle of Attack
6.00
8.00
10.00
Figure 2
15 | P a g e
60
L/D
40
20
0
-4
-2
10
-20
-40
Angle of Attack
Figure 3
16 | P a g e
12
References
Raw Data
Aero Lab 1
Fall 07
p
t
row
u
q
V
99100
23
1.165950252
1.82773E-05
867.3710308
38.57246947
R=
b=
S=
287
0.000001458
110.4
T=
c=
Re=
span=
Aref
296.15
0.1016
250000
0.3016
0.030643
Data Set 1
Angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
experimental
angle
-4
-2
-0.25
2
4
6
8
10
12
experimental
q
868
868
867
865
866
867
864
868
867
Lift
-0.25
-0.065
0.132
0.241
0.577
0.858
0.992
1.09
0.81
Drag
-0.051
-0.043
-0.028
-0.035
-0.042
-0.054
-0.063
-0.075
-0.295
experimental
angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
experimental
q
869
868
868
867
868
868
869
867
868
Lift
0.135
0.15
0.348
0.583
0.718
0.849
0.923
1.097
0.817
Drag
-0.04
-0.038
-0.041
-0.044
-0.05
-0.057
-0.058
-0.077
-0.299
Data Set 2
Angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Data Set 3
17 | P a g e
Angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
experimental
angle
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
experimental
q
867
868
866
867
867
868
867
867
868
Lift
0.135
0.143
0.303
0.425
0.595
0.843
1.005
1.075
0.93
Drag
-0.038
-0.04
-0.04
-0.042
-0.045
-0.056
-0.067
-0.075
-0.235
18 | P a g e