Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Issue # 364
AJC Letters
In This Issue:
Page Feature 1 2 2 3 3 4 6 6 8 8 10 11 Lying Viewed as Standard Smith & Barham Win Runoff Mathis Extends Thanks Beach House Grille Fayette Commission: Clean Sweep Bo Moss: Golf Tourney Fundraiser Institute on the Constitution
NO PENALTY for T-SPLOST Defeat Attitudes Toward Public Schools Schools: Problematic Bureaucracy
View or download at
WWW.SCRIBD.COM/HENRY_CITIZEN
~1~
Tommy Smith & Gary Barham Win Republican BOC Runoff Races
PROOF OF RIGHT. Posted by JOANIE SCOTT
Today the voters of Henry County decisively chose former Hampton Mayor Tommy Smith as their Republican candidate for Chairman of the Henry County Board of Commissioners over Incumbent BJ Mathis. Smith captured the race by exactly 1,900 votes over Mathis in a turnout of over 11,000 voters. He will now face Democratic Candidate Carlotta Harrell in the November General Election to determine who will become the next Commission Chairman. Also victorious tonight was Gary Barham who handily won the District 3 Commission seat over businessman Bill Toney. Congratulations to both of them for running a respectful campaign. Gary Barham will now face Democratic candidate Sandra Vincent in the November General Election to determine which will be the next District 3 Commissioner. In the meantime, keep your yard signs up for Tommy Smith, Gary Barham, and Bo Moss. On to November!
~2~
BEACH HOUSE GRILLE. Folks this is where you will find some of the best eats. Your search for
real, melt in your mouth pulled pork barbeque, the best burgers, or chicken wings ends HERE. All meats are fully cooked to your liking on the Green Egg smoker/grill. WOW. You won't eat another fried anything after tasting Beach House Grille's menu.
Here are the five commissioners who will be serving beginning 2013. STEVE BROWN and Allen McCarty are the two on the right. The Take Back Fayette County PAC got them elected in 2010 and now we have been successful in defeating all 5 of the incumbent commissioners from 2010 who were not listening to the citizens.
HTTP://WWW.THECITIZEN.COM/ARTICLES/08-21-2012/OGNIO-SWAMPS-INCUMBENT-HEARN-BARLOW-DEFEATS-HUDDLESTON-2-FAYETTECOMMISSION-POST
~3~
Range of factors made runoffs tough on incumbents Julianne Thompson, a co-chairwoman of the Atlanta Tea Party Patriots, sees another message in Tuesday's results: Voters just don't trust government. The Citizen: While former incumbents are blaming the economy and a general anti-incumbent sentiment for their losses they still don't get it. The incumbents removed from office portrayed the reasons so many people do not trust government. They showed we cannot trust the people IN government to conservatively represent us.
Henry County Commission District 1 Golf Tournament Fundraiser September 17, 2012 9:00 a.m.
Bo Moss, Republican Nominee for Henry County Commissioner in District 1 is holding a Golf Tournament Fundraiser at Cotton Fields Golf Course. With Special Invited Guest, Congressman Lynn Westmoreland. Lunch will be served after the game. For more information contact Bo at BO@WILLIAMBOMOSS.COM or call 678-447-2281 Cotton Fields Golf Course 400 Industrial Way McDonough, GA 30253
By Ron Sifen
Most people agree that one of the reasons that the TSPLOST failed was because government lost the trust of voters. TSPLOST supporters want to believe that all of the distrust is only because of the Ga. 400 toll debacle. They refuse to admit that voters figured out that most of the money was going to projects that would not
~4~
help to reduce traffic congestion on our roads. The projects list also contributed to the increased distrust of government. Many people were appalled that the TSPLOST contained a penalty for voting against it. Some people were intimidated by The Penalty into voting for the TSPLOST. But many voters found The Penalty to be even more reason to distrust government and the TSPLOST itself. In reality, The Penalty only involved one pot of money, and there was no penalty for most transportation projects. But TSPLOST proponents, including many government officials, repeatedly played The Penalty card to try to scare and manipulate voters into voting for the TSPLOST. In many cases they used misleading wording that made it sound like it would impact all future transportation projects. We were repeatedly told horror stories of the devastation that local government budgets would suffer because of The Penalty. I kept telling people that The Penalty was tiny compared to the financial consequences of approving the projects list. It turns out that The Penalty was even smaller than I thought. I learned a few days ago that The Penalty for every jurisdiction in the Atlanta region will be ZERO. Let me repeat that: The Penalty for every jurisdiction in the Atlanta region will be ZERO. The Local Maintenance and Improvement Grants is an annual pot of money that is available for distribution to all jurisdictions in Georgia. It is my understanding that each jurisdiction s allocation is based one-third on population and two-thirds on centerline miles of eligible roadway. Each jurisdiction can submit applications for amounts up to its annual allocation. Throughout the state, the overwhelming majority of LMIG funds are used by local governments for resurfacing roads. In the past each jurisdiction would simply submit a list of eligible projects that met the criteria for LMIG funds, and they would get the money. Now, in the nine regions that rejected the TSPLOST, each jurisdiction has to demonstrate a 30 percent match. So, let s figure out what this means by looking at how The Penalty will impact Cobb. Cobb s annual LMIG allocation is approximately $3 million. That means that in order for Cobb to get the $3 million it must show that it will spend at least $900,000 of its own money on the projects that qualify for LMIG funding. Essentially, that means that in order to get the $3 million, Cobb must now show $3.9 million of qualifying projects. But it turns out, that Cobb already spends far more than $3.9 million every year on qualifying projects. Therefore, the effective Penalty for Cobb adds up to a total of ZERO dollars. And this is also true for every jurisdiction in the Atlanta region. The Penalty for every jurisdiction in the Atlanta region will be ZERO. The Penalty could hurt some of the poorer counties in rural Georgia who depend on LMIG for virtually all of their resurfacing. In the Atlanta region, every jurisdiction already spends more than the 30 percent match on qualifying projects, so the amount of additional funds that they will have to pay is ZERO. Let s not forget other manipulations, like claiming the TSPLOST would alleviate traffic congestion, but only by defining alleviate traffic congestion as meaning increasing the hypothetical number of people who could reach a given point within 45 minutes. They wound up admitting that the TSPLOST projects list would have an insignificant impact on reducing commute times.
~5~
Once this became widely known, TSPLOST was dead, based on its merits (or lack thereof). The TSPLOST was sold to us based on reducing traffic congestion on our roads. Voters rejected the TSPLOST when they realized that it would not reduce traffic congestion on our roads. Government officials put together a projects list that would not reduce traffic congestion, and then government officials pounded voters with misleading information. Now these government officials wonder why voters don t trust them. Voters are tired of being manipulated and mislead. And now we learn that The Penalty is ZERO.
Ron Sifen of Vinings is president of the Cobb County Civic Coalition.
Are you concerned about the future of America? Do you worry about the erosion of liberty as the government grows larger and more powerful? Are you troubled by the moral decline you see around you? Are you wondering if there is anything you can do to help restore the American Constitutional Republic? If asked by your children or grandchildren, would you have difficulty explaining the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
If you answered Yes to any of the above questions you are invited to participate in the
Restoring the Foundations of the Constitution of these United States WHAT: IOTC is a twelve (12) part lecture series presented on DVD by John Eidsmoe, a Constitutional attorney with degrees in theology, law and political science. WHERE: Crossroads Christian Church, Parkland Center 3287 Highway 42, Stockbridge, Georgia 30281 WHEN: Begins Sunday, September 9, 2012 and will meet each Sunday night through November 25, 2012 TIME: 5:00p.m. - 6:30p.m. HOST: Pastor Ken Davidson, Senior Pastor of Crossroads Christian Church Co-Host: Larry McNorton, Director of High Point Christian Academy/Constitution Party Representative
~6~
*This is free seminar, however if you wish to have your own student workbook the cost is $35.00 to IOTC.
Seats are limited for this lecture series to about 60 persons, so please call Pastor Ken Davidson at 770.634.0578 or Larry McNorton at 404.395.2903 to reserve your seat and workbook.
Lecture Number 1
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
4 5
5:00p.m. 5:00p.m.
6:30p.m. 6:30p.m.
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
November 4, 2012
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
10
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
11
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
12
5:00p.m.
6:30p.m.
Topic A Biblical View of History, Law, and Government The Discovery, Settlement, and Evangelization of America The Religious Beliefs of the Founding Fathers The Founding Fathers Five Fold Formula 1776 1789: From Independence to the Constitution An Overview of the Constitution: Preamble; Article I An Overview of the Constitution: Article II and III An Overview of the Constitution: Article IVVII An Overview of the Constitution: The Bill of Rights; the First Amendment An Overview of the Constitution: Amendments II - XXVII An Overview of the Constitution: The Crisis of the Constitution: From Biblical Absolutes to Evolutionary Humanism Reclaiming the Constitution: A Victory Plan for Restoring Our Constitutional Heritage
~7~
2012 annual PDK/Gallup Poll Public s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools
There was the usual us and them divide in the PDK/Gallup findings; 48 percent of Americans award their own schools an A or a B, but only 19 percent feel the rest of the schools in the country merit such high grades. But 62 percent are willing to pay more in taxes in order to improve urban public schools And asked the No. 1 problem facing schools, 35 percent of respondents say lack of financial support. The poll notes stark divisions by political party. Here are highlights from the poll: On providing children of illegal immigrants free public education, school lunches, and other benefits, 65 percent of Democrats versus 21 percent of Republicans said yes. But overall, the poll found support for providing public education to these children is increasing; 41 percent of Americans favor this, up from 28 percent in 1995. Charter schools: Republicans are more supportive (80 percent) than Democrats (54 percent). However, approval declined overall to 66 percent this year from a record 70 percent last year. The public is split in its support of school vouchers, with nearly half (44 percent) believing that we should allow students and parents to choose a private school to attend at public expense, up 10 percentage points from last year. Taxes: Ninety-seven percent of the public agreed that it is very or somewhat important to improve the nation s urban schools, and almost two of three Americans (62 percent) said they would pay more taxes to provide funds to improve the quality of urban schools. Eighty-nine percent of Americans agree that it is very or somewhat important to close the achievement gap between white students and black and Hispanic students. Teacher evaluations: Americans are almost evenly split in requiring teacher evaluations to reflect student scores on standardized tests, with 52 percent in favor. But at least three of four believe that entrance requirements into teacher preparation programs need to be at least as selective as those for engineering, business, pre-law, and pre-medicine. Presidential race and education: The poll found that President Barack Obama holds a slight lead (49 percent) over Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney (44 percent) as the candidate who would strengthen public schools. Overall, 50 percent of Americans view the Democratic party as more interested in improving public education While Americans are divided on many issues regarding the direction of our education system, they stand united in agreement on some very important issues, said William Bushaw, executive director of PDK International and co-director of the PDK/Gallup poll, in a statement. Most important, it is reassuring to know that, despite the recognition that our schools need improvement, more than 70 percent of Americans do have trust and confidence in our public school teachers. ***
Problematic Bureaucracy
Money is spent on expensive technology that is unused or underused because people aren t sufficiently trained to use it or it is deemed not necessary after being purchased.
~8~
Across the board budget cuts (vs. strategic, targeted cost reductions), operational inefficiencies and administrative overhead mean that too few taxpayer dollars actually reach the classroom. Teachers often don t receive the support they need, and many talented Americans don t even enter the profession Teachers don t receive the adequate instructional resources, materials and technology they need to tailor instruction to every student. Teachers lack access to mentors, master teachers, collaborative planning time, expert lesson plans and best practices to grow professionally by working with their peers. Teachers lack access to proven interventions for students who are struggling. Principals often lack the time to support teachers in the classroom because of paperwork and other regulatory burdens (e.g., unnecessary paperwork for central office sign-offs on field trips). Test results throughout the year are provided to teachers too late for them to re-teach subjects and fill gaps in learning before students take high-stakes exams or before the end of the year, so students enter those exams without core knowledge and skills and fall behind grade level. Teachers do not have the training and support they need to keep an entire classroom of students disciplined, focused on, and excited about learning. Central office staff and principals are not evaluated regularly nor are they held responsible for teacher or student success. Even though millions of American children are not able to read or do math at grade level, teachers are nearly always found effective/satisfactory on evaluations, because those evaluations are not meaningful, not connected to what teachers actually do and not connected to whether students learn. Meaningless evaluations leave teachers in the dark as to how they are truly performing and provide little to no guidance on how to improve. Top teachers are not properly recognized, rewarded or compensated, so they leave the profession. School boards focus on micromanaging, adult in-fighting, and complying with existing policies and procedures rather than on solving these systematic problems to create environments that support teachers and students and lead to academic achievement. School boards and committees require district staff to spend excessive time preparing for meetings and reporting to the board, rather than spending time working to directly support teachers and students. Many elected officials, who are not aware of the scope of hurdles facing these systems and/or whose campaigns were funded by special interests neglect this crisis altogether, or pass laws that attempt to fix one issue (e.g., class size reduction) but which
~9~
inadvertently cause additional bureaucratic problems (e.g., hiring enough effective teachers to meet the class size mandate).
~11~
Email: HC.CITIZEN@HCCITIZEN.ORG
~12~