Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment No. 1
EE-529 Power Converter Design Session: MSSE 2013-15 Assigned on: 31-Jan-2014 To be submitted on: 03-Feb-2014 Instructor: Mr. Tanveer Abass
Question No. 1
Study of switching characteristics of power diode [10A10 and PURG5060] in simulation
Part-1:
Simulate the above listed diodes with an RL load by applying a square wave source of 500V @ 1kHz and rise/fall time=1sec. Load impedance should be 50. Simulate the circuit for load time constant of 1sec, 0.5sec and 0.1sec : For a RL load impedance of = 50 ohms and time constant (), we can find the values of R and L by using following equations: () = And 1 + (2 ) 2
() =
The Circuit which was simulated is shown in Figure-1. In the circuits I have used the Free Wheeling Diodes because without them the response of Vd (Voltage drop across diode) and Id (Series current through diode) appeared to be oscillatory during the off cycle of switching signal (A sample waveform is shown ahead). Now the values of (Resistance) and (Inductance) will be changed according to the required time constant (T) and the particular values will be calculated using the above given two equations. Rest of the circuit was made according to the required configuration.
Page 2
PART-2:
You are expected to measure voltage and current waveforms for the diodes as function of time (on the same graph for comparison): A- Time Constant () = 1usec The result of simulation for this is shown below (R = 50 ohms and L = 50uH were used): a. Response of 10A07 diode at rising edge:
Page 3
Page 4
B- Time Constant () = 0.5 usec The result of simulation for this is shown below (R = 49.99 ohms and L = 24.99uH were used): a. Response of 10A07 diode at rising edge:
Page 5
C- Time Constant () = 0.1 usec The result of simulation for this is shown below (R = 49.99 ohms and L = 4.99uH were used):
Muhammad Shafique (Ms-13-25864) Page 6
Page 7
Observation:
From the response curves it can be seen that the Reverse Recovery Time of 15ETH06 is too less/sharp than that of 10A07 and this is obvious because 10A07 is a simple rectifier diode while 15ETH06 is the Fast diode (trr = 22 ns) As the time constant is varied the transient response becomes sharp while some amplitude increase of reverse recovery current (Idrr) overshoots is also observed for the case of 10A07 but decrease in reverse recovery current (Idrr) overshoots is observed for the case of fast diode (15ETH06).
PART-3:
Measure reverse recovery current and time and try to correlate it the values given in the datasheet for PURG5060/15ETH06 Fast diode (trr = 22ns) : Since I have used 15ETH06 instead of RURG5060 in our simulation so I am using the data, given in the datasheet of 15Eth06, for the comparison: According to datasheet: According to datasheet for the following test conditions @ IF = 15 A, VR = 390V (Reverse voltage),d IF /dt = 800 A/us then the trr = 51 ns and Irrm(Peak reverse recovery current ) = 20A.
Page 8
The corresponding condition of our simulating circuits are: @ IF = 10 A, VR =500V,d IF /dt = ?? A/us. The corresponding trr = 1-2 ns (approx.) for our circuit and the Irrm = -4A (approx.) Apparently there is very bad correlation b/w datasheet value and simulated values.
Page 9
Question No. 2
Study of switching characteristics of power MOSFET[IRF540] in simulation
Note about Simulation: PROTEUS ISIS8 Simulator is used using the N-Channel MOSFET IRF540 as a Power Switch.
PART-1:
Simulate the above listed MOSFET with a resistive load of 10 by applying a DC source of 50V and a gate signal of appropriate amplitude @ 1kHz-10kHz. Vgs or gate drive signal was determined by the maximum load current and the MOSFET characteristic curves. I used the VgsON= 15 volts @ Idsmax = 5 A (approx). Figure-2 Shows the circuit used for the simulation of this question:
PART-2:
You are expected to measure voltage and current waveforms for the Switch as function of time (on the same graph for comparison) for a single frequency @5kHz: It is shown below:
Page 11
Part-3:
Measure power dissipation at different frequencies and present your finding as a graph between power dissipation and frequency of switching. Compare the results with your calculation you have done previously for power dissipation : A- Power Dissipation curve at Fs = 1 K Hz [Falling Edge i.e ON to OFF]:
Page 12
Page 13
According to the study done in the class/lectures, the power dissipation in switch is approximately directly proportional to the frequency of switching but PROTEUS ISIS8 only shows the slight variations in power dissipation at the transitions only (ON to OFF and ViceVersa) while the ON-State Power Dissipation remained almost constant over the variation of switching frequency. Unfortunately, to the best of my knowledge, in PROTEUS ISIS8 there is no any working tool to measure the average power dissipation /average voltage/average current of the switch/component. So I drew the power curve (w.r.t time) for each frequency but the comparison of curves didnt show the power dissipation variations if frequency is changed. I tried to trouble shoot it but It could not give the quantitative measure of variations in power dissipation.
But Ideally and Practically the average power dissipation (Pd) of switch will vary w.r.t switching frequency and the variations will be governed by the positive slope of approximately constant value.