This document summarizes an interview with Wael Hallaq, a leading scholar of Islamic law. Hallaq discusses two major obstacles facing intellectual engagement between Muslim thinkers and their Western counterparts: 1) the linguistic obstacle of accessing Islamic languages and texts, which is more than just a technical issue and tied to power dynamics, and 2) differing starting premises, as Muslim thinkers generally begin from a religious context defined by history, while Western thinkers follow secular rationalism. Hallaq argues these obstacles are rooted in the constitution and structure of power relations between the West and the Islamic world.
This document summarizes an interview with Wael Hallaq, a leading scholar of Islamic law. Hallaq discusses two major obstacles facing intellectual engagement between Muslim thinkers and their Western counterparts: 1) the linguistic obstacle of accessing Islamic languages and texts, which is more than just a technical issue and tied to power dynamics, and 2) differing starting premises, as Muslim thinkers generally begin from a religious context defined by history, while Western thinkers follow secular rationalism. Hallaq argues these obstacles are rooted in the constitution and structure of power relations between the West and the Islamic world.
This document summarizes an interview with Wael Hallaq, a leading scholar of Islamic law. Hallaq discusses two major obstacles facing intellectual engagement between Muslim thinkers and their Western counterparts: 1) the linguistic obstacle of accessing Islamic languages and texts, which is more than just a technical issue and tied to power dynamics, and 2) differing starting premises, as Muslim thinkers generally begin from a religious context defined by history, while Western thinkers follow secular rationalism. Hallaq argues these obstacles are rooted in the constitution and structure of power relations between the West and the Islamic world.
May 1 !"1#by Hasan Azad [Wael Hallaq.] $hro%gho%t the last three decades& Wael Hallaq has e'erged as one o( the leading scholars o( Isla'ic law in Western acade'ia) He has 'ade 'a*or contrib%tions not only to the st%dy o( the theory and +ractice o( Isla'ic law& b%t to the develo+'ent o( a 'ethodology thro%gh which Isla'ic scholars have been able to con(ront challenges (acing the Isla'ic legal tradition) Hallaq is th%s %niq%ely +laced to address broader q%estions concerning the 'oral and intellect%al (o%ndations o( co'+eting 'odern +ro*ects) With his 'ost recent wor,& The Impossible State, Hallaq lays bare the +ower dyna'ics and +olitical +rocesses at the root o( +heno'ena that are otherwise o(ten e-a'ined +%rely thro%gh the lens o( the legal) In this interview& the (irst o( a two.+art series with hi'& Hallaq e-+ands %+on so'e o( the i'+lications o( those arg%'ents and the challenges they +ose (or the (%t%re o( intellect%al engage'ents across vario%s traditions) In +artic%lar& he addresses the (ail%re o( Western intellect%als to engage with scholars in Isla'ic societies as well as the intellect%al and str%ct%ral challenges (acing M%sli' scholars) Hallaq also critiq%es the %nderlying hege'onic +ro*ect o( Western liberalis' and the %ncritical ado+tion o( it by so'e M%sli' thin,ers) Hasan Azad (HA): One of the debates raging nowadays has been about the inattention that Musli intelle!tuals re!ei"e in the West. One !an say that# with relati"ely inor e$!e%tions# the odern Musli %resen!e in# or !ontribution to# the intelle!tual world of the West is near nil. &n the !losing %ages of yourImpossible State# you ha"e %ointed out that a robust intelle!tual engageent between Musli thin'ers and their Western !ounter%arts is essential# not only for the sa'e of better Western understanding of &sla# but also for the sa'e of enlarging the s!o%e of intelle!tual %ossibilities in the idst of (uro)Aeri!an thought. *our arguent# & belie"e# eant to !on"ey the idea that there is u!h that the &slai! world"iew and heritage !an !ontribute toward enri!hing our refle!tions on the odern %ro+e!t# in the West no less than in the (ast. What is that !ontribution# and why is it not ha%%ening, What are the obsta!les standing in the way, Wael Hallaq (WA): $o s+ea, o( the +otential contrib%tions o( Isla' to a critiq%e and restr%ct%ring o( the 'odern +ro*ect is a tall order& one that sho%ld co'e s%bseq%ent to a diagnosis o( the +resent 'odern condition and its ca%ses) $he obstacles yo% all%ded to are n%'ero%s and '%ltilayered& and originate in both sides o( the divide) I( there are any (ailings/and there are 'any indeed/they cannot be located on one side only) $he (irst& and 'ost obvio%s o( co%rse& is the ling%istic obstacle& the only 'eans to co''%nicating ideas) $he West (by which I here 'ean 0%ro+e& its 0nlighten'ent& distinctively modern instit%tions and c%lt%re and the s+read o( all these 'ainly to 1orth A'erica)& has seen it s%((icient to consider its two or three 'a*or lang%ages so %niversal as not to care to learn other lang%ages well& i( at all) 0ven Orientalis'& as an acade'ic disci+line& has not been s%ccess(%l in +rod%cing s%stained co''and o( Isla'ic lang%ages& des+ite the (act that it did +rod%ce individ%als whose ling%istic co'+etence even in 'ore than one Isla'ic lang%age was no less than 'aster(%l) It re'ains the case however that those who can navigate an Isla'ic lang%age or te-t are a 'inisc%le/in (act insigni(icant/'inority in Western societies) 2%t there is a larger sense to Orientalis' involved here) In 'any ways& the (ield o( Orientalis' is s%rro%nded by an o%ter& i''ensely e-tensive layer3 that is& co%ntless n%'bers o( in(l%ential voices who really never bothered to do any o( the hard intellect%al and +hilological wor, on Isla'3 yet& they (eel q%ite *%sti(ied and con(ident to +rono%nce on the 4Orient&5 both within the classroo's o( acade'ia or as so.called 4e-+erts5 in 'ass 'edia) $his 4+eri+heral5 Orientalis' %s%ally esca+es o%r co''on de(initions o( that disci+line& b%t it (or's the b%l, o( co''on and +o+%lar Western ,nowledge abo%t the rest o( the world& es+ecially Isla') In any case& this is ro%ghly the ling%istic obstacle) HA: Would you say that this is a te!hni!al obsta!le# one of logisti!s and of o"er!oing linguisti!) %edagogi!al "enues of transitting ideas, WH: It 'ay begin as a technical iss%e o( co%rse& b%t in reality it is '%ch 'ore than that) Accessing another c%lt%re thro%gh lang%age is a choice& which Western +owers and their intellect%al elites e((ectively e-ercised at one +oint in the service o( their colonial ca%ses) Here& accessing the Isla'ic lang%ages did not constit%te a 'a*or di((ic%lty& '%ch less a technical one) 6olonialis' req%ired the +rod%ction o( classical orientalis'& (or witho%t the (or'er the latter wo%ld not have co'e into e-istence in the way and sha+e it has (inally acq%ired and contin%es to develo+) In the sa'e vein& (ail%re to access a lang%age is (%nda'entally a s%bstantive 'atter& not strictly a technical one) 7or e-a'+le& 'y decision to write in 0nglish and not Indian or 6hinese8i( that is my decision at all8is a co'+le- s%bstantive 'atter that ties in directly to the relationshi+ between +ower and ,nowledge& between 'y bac,gro%nd as a coloni9ed s%b*ect and the 'a,ers o( that colonial history) And there is nothing 'ore telling abo%t the s%bstantive co'+le-ity o( the iss%e o( lang%age than the Western %niversity +ro(essor who re+rod%ces 4Isla'5 witho%t (eeling the need to %nderstand 4it5 thro%gh a close te-t%al& sociological& or8a'ong others8anthro+ological st%dy o( that +heno'enon) And all o( these acade'ic endeavors& to be gen%inely engaged& req%ire a decent co''and o( one or another Isla'ic lang%age& even s+ea,ing and living it) $his +ro(essor:s choice not to bother with any o( these req%ire'ents (which see' to be ta,en (or granted in nearly any other conte-t) is a 'atter to do with the constit%tion and str%ct%re o( +ower& not with 'ere +ersonal inco'+etence to 'aster a lang%age) HA: What would be another !entral obsta!le, WH: Another very i'+ortant obstacle to note is that& with rare e-ce+tions& M%sli' thin,ers begin with (%nda'entally di((erent +re'ises (ro' those that Western writers start (ro'& however '%ch they conscio%sly or %nconscio%sly e'%late Western tho%ght and +hiloso+hical writing) 0ven the 4%tilitarianists5 or 4q%asi. %tilitarianists5 o( the late nineteenth and early twentieth cent%ry8the li,es o( M%ha''ad Abd%h and es+ecially ;ashid ;ida8tho%ght in a (ra'ewor, that ass%'ed as a starting +oint two things: (a) a religio%s conte-t (ro' which they can tal,& and which de(ines the li'its& i( not conto%rs& o( their narratives& and (b) a historical conte-t or& 'ore +recisely& a s%bstantive (ra'e o( history that contin%es to be a so%rce o( a%thority (or legiti'ating (or's o( 'odern li(e) And when I say 4history5 or 4historical5 here& I 'ean a (airly co''itted historical engage'ent that calls %+on 'any bygone cent%ries as a so%rce o( ,nowledge and g%idance& trying to retrieve (ro' this history& or thro%gh it& an inter+retation that conforms to living in the 'odern world (this o( co%rse entailed considerable +roble's that I ho+e I can address later)) Or& one co%ld +%t it di((erently and say that little in the way o( engaging with the 'odern co%ld be acco'+lished witho%t bringing that history and those religio%s te-ts to bear on a +artic%lar8very +artic%lar8inter+retation& na'ely& that which is s+eci(ically 'odern) And these two interconnected co''it'ents8the religio%s one in +artic%lar8stood and contin%e to stand in violation o( a sacred +rinci+le in the 'odern Western intellect%al 'ilie% (and I %se 4sacred5 advisedly)) $o be ta,en serio%sly in this intellect%al 'ilie% o( o%rs today& yo% cannot +res%++ose8as yo%r (o%nding +re'ise8a traditional 'eta+hysic& however intellect%ally so+histicated it 'ay be& and no 'atter the e-tent to which it endorses liberal doctrines and +ractices (i( any& this will involve yo% in co'+o%nded +roble's)) And even i( yo% atte'+t so '%ch (as so'e s%rely have done)& yo%r arg%'ent wo%ld have no hearing %nless it is serio%sly s%b*ected to the disc%rsive ter's o( a 4sec%lar.rationalist5 narrative) $he nat%ral law de(enders in today:s West are an e-cellent case in +oint& b%t this +artic%lar lot (aces relatively (ewer and less s%bstantial obstacles than their M%sli' co%nter+arts) <econd& the 0nlighten'ent conce+t o( history (one with which we contin%e to live today)& tho%gh itsel( still dee+ly historical& +arado-ically denies certain as+ects o( history) 7or e-a'+le& there is a contradiction within the Western theory o( +rogress itsel(8o( invo,ing a +artic%lar brand o( history while si'%ltaneo%sly +itting itsel( against& i( not %nder'ining& what we call today traditional history (which the 0nlighten'ent and its +rogress theory created in the (irst +lace=)) <o history has always been a +roble'atic iss%e in a 'odernity that insists on the +aradig'atic ado+tion o( a theory o( +rogress) $he M%sli' intellect%al elite& on the other hand& has only recently beg%n to relate to the dee+er signi(ications o( this worldview& which8in the +artic%lar way it has been done8is not& in 'y o+inion& a welco'e ste+) $he conce+t o( +rogress itsel( is a dee+ly +roble'atic one& and M%sli' intellect%als and historians ali,e have not been able so (ar to dissect its inner ideological str%ct%res) And we can see the e((ects o( this (ail%re in at least one i'+ortant s+here) >%ring the +ast two or three decades& a new trend has e'erged in the M%sli' world that tends to conde'n Isla'ic history as 4dar, and ab%sive&5 re+licating al'ost e-actly the 0%ro+ean narrative o( conde'ning the violations o( the 6atholic 6h%rch and 'onarchical absol%tis') $he trend (al'ost entirely ignorant o( its own intellect%al heritage and history) began to show (aint signs early on in the twentieth cent%ry& b%t it did not gain 'o'ent%' %ntil 'ore than hal( a cent%ry later) ?i,e '%ch o( liberal val%es and doctrines& with which the theory o( +rogress organically coalesced& it too, so'e ti'e to internali9e the' into what has beco'e a 4native disco%rse)5 Altho%gh the historical worlds o( diverse and '%lti(aceted Isla' and 0%ro+e co%ld not have been 'ore di((erent& 4Isla'ic history5 is grad%ally beginning to loo, li,e the 0%ro+ean dar, ages) As histories o( o++ression and o( +olitical and 4legal5 ab%se& they& %ns%r+risingly& e'erge as a near identity) Perha+s a little later I will e-+lain how this +lays o%t regarding the s%b*ect o( o%r concern) 1onetheless& the insistence on historical and religio%s narratives as constit%ting a legiti'i9ed and legiti'i9ing tradition re'ains the (%nda'ental (eat%re that contin%es to se+arate and +it a+art the Western.0nlighten'ent thin,ers (ro' their M%sli' co%nter+arts (not to 'ention the notorio%s e+iste'ic& +olitical& and ideological di((ic%lties to which this (eat%re has given rise)) $he (or'er declare (+erceived) abstracted 4reason5 as the tool o( h%'an g%idance +ar e-cellence& whereas the latter& even the 'ost liberal a'ongst the'& invo,e that historico. religio%s narrative at nearly every t%rn& even when they conde'n it) @%st consider the li,es o( M%ha''ad Ar,o%n& M) Abed al.@abiri& Ali Harb& Hasan Hana(i& M%ha''ad <hahr%r& even the 6hristian Aeorge $arabishi& and n%'ero%s others (ro' the Iranian& Malayan& and <%b.6ontinental Indian worlds (these and their il, who (or' 'ost o( the category I re(er to as M%sli' intellect%als)) At the end o( the day& they are %nable to do witho%t the B%ran& to say the least) Which is also to say that these writers can never a++eal to a sec%lar& radically non. scri+t%ralist tradition as that o( 'ainstrea' 0nlighten'entCWestern tho%ght) HA: &t sees to e# +udging fro soe of your le!tures# that what you said about s!ri%tural foundations is erely the ti% of the i!eberg. Would you !are to dwell a little ore on this thee, WH: O( co%rse) I sho%ld also note that the disc%rsive 'anner in which 'odern M%sli' thin,ers artic%lated and contin%e to artic%late the'selves is not li,ely to attract the attention8and th%s engage'ent8o( either Western acade'ia or Western tho%ght at large) ?et 'e e-+lain why) ;o%ghly (very ro%ghly) s+ea,ing& there are two ca'+s or trends within 'odern Isla'ic and Isla'ist tho%ght ((or 'y s+eci(ic +%r+oses here& 4Isla'ic5 and 4Isla'ist5 are not very disting%ishable (ro' each other)) One is a great 'a*ority that has been (or too long bidding (or a losing vent%re& both internally and e-ternally3 na'ely& the vent%re o( rationali9ing Isla' (in nearly all o( its as+ects) in ter's o( liberal +hiloso+hy and liberal categories o( tho%ght) A dee+ %nderstanding o( this +ro*ect will reveal 'a*or reasons (or its inel%ctable (ail%re& b%t this is not 'y concern today) Instead& I want to stress that as a syste' o( tho%ght and +ractice& liberalis' has yet to be digested by the leading intellect%als o( the M%sli' world8 notable rare e-ce+tions notwithstanding) $his (ail%re to %nderstand is in (act a do%ble one: M%sli' intellect%als have yet to %nderstand and a++reciate the trenchant8and at ti'es radical8critiq%e o( liberalis' (ro' within the 0%ro.A'erican tradition itsel(& whether liberal or not) (And here as elsewhere& 40%ro.A'erican5 incl%des the A%stralian& a'ong other +laces& as these have also 'ade so'e signi(icant contrib%tions in this regard)) $he other trend or ca'+ in 'odern Isla'ic tho%ght is a thin one& and is e'erging slowly b%t ho+e(%lly steadily and s%rely) $his is the Isla'ic critical school s+earheaded by the Moroccan lang%age& logic& and 'oral +hiloso+her $aha Abd%rrah'an& who has not s%cc%'bed to the 0nlighten'ent 'odes o( tho%ght) His critical. constr%ctive a++roach signals a +ro'ising innovating beginning (ro' which a new +ath o( thin,ing and re. artic%lation can begin) 1ow& 'y +oint is this: neither ca'+ is li,ely in the short ter' to attract the attention o( Western thin,ers +artly beca%se the 4M%sli' liberals5 (who are the overwhel'ing 'a*ority) wo%ld be dee'ed by their Western co%nter+arts as second& i( not third.rate& intellect%als& and e'%lators o( sorts) $here is nothing in the tho%ght and +ractice o( these M%sli' liberals that is o( val%e to the vigoro%s debate abo%t liberalis' raging in the West (however +roble'atic and sel(.absorbed it 'ay be)) I( anything& their collective +osition e((ectively re+resents an endorse'ent o( liberal clai's and val%es& a (act that has the %navoidable e((ect o(& (irst& strengthening these clai's and rendering the' resilient in the (ace o( criticis'& and second& o( bestowing *%sti(ication %+on liberal states to contin%e to 'olest Isla'ic co%ntries witho%t re'orse) 7%rther'ore& the (ate o( these e'%lators will inevitably rese'ble the disdain with which the +re.'odern M%sli' mujtahids and q%asi.mujtahids regarded the muqallidun) And in this& no one sho%ld bla'e the Western thin,ers) As a 'atter o( legal.'oral +ractice& taqlid 'ay have been val%able i( not necessary& b%t in the do'ain o( critical tho%ght and analysis& it can never gain any res+ect) A muqallid is si'+ly so'eone who has nothing to say& however '%ch babble he or she 'ay %tter) And the (ate o( the second ca'+ will not (are any better& at least in the short or (oreseeable r%n) However& I sta,e '%ch on the attractiveness o( this ca'+ in the long r%n& beca%se I see it as one e-+ression o( a +ro'ising change) I (ind the o++ositions between the general +ath o( Western intelligentsia and s%ch a++roaches as that o( Abd%rrah'an to be too great (altho%gh in the case o( this +hiloso+her& one '%st (ind it signi(icant that he arrived at his syste' o( tho%ght a(ter having digested '%ch o( the 0%ro+ean +hiloso+hical tradition)) <o even i( 'ainstrea' Western tho%ght were to notice or access the wor,s o( the Moroccan +hiloso+her and his li,es& I a' not s%re it will ,now what to do with the') ?ang%age barriers or not& the challenges that this ca'+ +%ts (orth are (or'idable by any standard) Perha+s they will be relegated to the shel( o( c%rio%s 4Oriental5 ob*ects& as has been done with so '%ch o( Isla'ic +heno'ena) Abd%rrah'an:s dee+ 'oral challenge is si'+ly indigestible by the c%rrent Western 'ainstrea') HA: -his sounds li'e a deadlo!'. Where do we go fro here, WH: <o (ar& it has been a deadloc,& b%t only in the sense that the two ca'+s have not yet 'et) $he engage'ent is yet to ta,e +lace& and then we can see i( a real deadloc, will ta,e +lace) 2%t so (ar& not even a beginning o( an e-change is ta,ing +laces) I do not see a Michael <andel& an Alasdair MacIntyre& a 6harles $aylor& or anyone o( their caliber or leanings dialoging with& say& $aha Abd%rrah'an or anyone else (or that 'atter) Most +robably& these +hiloso+hers have never heard o( hi'& and (ran,ly& I do%bt that even the li,es o( $aylor will e'erge o%t o( their i''ediate intellect%al worlds and interests to +%t (orward s%ch an e((ort) And i( s%ch a gro%+ o( +hiloso+hers is not li,ely to engage in a dialog%e& then there is little ho+e o( others *oining) InThe Impossible State I tried to (ra'e so'e o( the q%estions the M%sli' world is dealing with in a way that is8I ho+e8digestible to the Western intellect%al) And I called8at the end o( the boo,8on M%sli' intellect%als also to try to co'e at least one ste+ (orward with a view to (or'%lating their iss%es in ways that a Western a%dience& or Western intellect%als& can relate to) 2%t this in itsel( is certainly not eno%gh) As I said earlier& there '%st be a q%alitatively di((erent and critical body o( tho%ght& +%lling behind it eno%gh weight to 'a,e Western intellect%als listen) $he challenge is st%+endo%s) We acade'icians and intellect%als do everything we can to ennoble the i'age o( ,nowledge as a s%bli'e +%rs%it& b%t this is one o( the biggest 'odern 'yths we live) I %nderstand and acce+t the veracity o( this i'age in a conte-t in which ,nowledge was +%rs%ed (or 'oral ends& that is& (or +ractical ethics& the way& (or e-a'+le& Aha9alian or Aq%inian ethics was constr%cted and constr%ed in its own environ'ent) 2%t the trans(or'ations in the 'odern world& and the %n+recedented co'+licity between ,nowledge and +ower (which t%rns o%t at the end to be the +ower o( the <ch'ittian political) 'a,e this the 'yth that I see) I( +olitics is war by other 'eans& and %ndo%btedly it is& then ,nowledge8incl%ding acade'ia8is +olitics.c%'.war by other 'eans) $he a++earance o( ,nowledge:s (or' as the b%siness o( so(t.handed +ro(essors and bearded older scholars& with eager st%dents who are on a 4q%est to ,now&5 sho%ld never 'as, or change this sober reality) In (act& it is one o( the greatest 'odern dece+tions) M%sli' intellect%als and an in(inite n%'ber o( 'any others have yet to digest the +ower o( this +hysically cr%shing 'eta+hor)