Dec 2011

Notes: 1) * mandatory field

STEP 1: Risk Details STEP 3: Response
Risk
Source
L
e
v
e
l
P
r
o
b
a
b
ilit
y
*

F
in
a
n
c
ia
l
Im
p
a
c
t
*

S
c
h
e
d
u
le

Im
p
a
c
t
*

P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

Im
p
a
c
t
*

E
n
v
ir
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l Im
p
a
c
t
H
e
a
lt
h
&

S
a
f
e
t
y
Im
p
a
c
t
C
u
r
r
e
n
t

C
o
m
b
in
e
d

S
c
o
r
e
F
in
a
n
c
ia
l
S
c
o
r
e
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

B
a
s
e
lin
e

L
o
w
c
o
s
t

e
s
t
im
a
t
e

k
H
ig
h
c
o
s
t

e
s
t
im
a
t
e

k
E
v
e
n
t

p
r
o
b
a
b
ilit
y

(
P
)
%
M
e
a
n

F
in
a
n
c
ia
l
Im
p
a
c
t
P
*
I
1
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Delay to statutory undertaker
services at south end of Spring
Garden Lane
Delay to contract.
Increased disruption to members of the
public
M L H 12 6 12 5 100 40% 21
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Manage
Start negotiations with service providers as soon as possible
to plan works.
2
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Objection to signals at south end
of Spring Garden Lane on
environmental grounds
Application for judicial review Delay to contract &legal fees L L H 8 4 8 10 100 20% 11
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Avoid Carry out public consultation
3
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
tRisk of Public Safety during
Construction
Injuries/ fatalities to members of the public
Injury compensation costs +poor local
and national PR
L M VL H 8 6 8 10 250 20% 26
O
p
e
n
Main Contractor Transfer Maintain site security as per contractural requirement
4
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Difficultly of accurately pricing
contract
Market forces affecting tender
prices
Tender price exceeds cost budget
Additional funding required - poor PR
for HCC
M M VL 9 9 9 1 300 30% 45
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Escalate Reviewcosts and risks at key stages.
5
P
r
o
je
c
t
T
e
c
h
n
ic
a
l
Unknown services encountered
during construction
Delay to contract
Increased disruption to members of the
public
L L L L 4 4 4 1 100 20% 10
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Escalate To be managed on site.
6
S
tr
a
te
g
ic

Objections to TROs on Grove
Road and Stoke Road delay
scheme/require revised designs
Possible delay to contract award
Delay to Contract and/or reduced scope
of works
VH L H VH L 25 10 25 1 50 80% 20
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC)
Combinati
on
Public consultation and effective TRO processes
7
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
tConstruction noise expected from
machinery during site hours
Stop notice may be issued by Local
Authority. Section 61 requirements restricting
activities.
Delay and additional costs during
construction
L L L M 6 4 6 5 100 10% 5
O
p
e
n
Main Contractor Transfer To be managed on site.
8
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Some specialist products are
required for the scheme eg. bus
stops, kerbs
There may be difficulties securing and
aquiring specialist products
Delay of delivery of materials to Contractor
Delay to Contract VL L M 3 2 3 1 50 5% 1
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Manage Management Plan
9
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
tDelay to programme causes works
to extend beyond funding window.
out funding Dft Funding window HCC need to find additional funding VL M L 3 3 3 200 500 5% 18
O
p
e
n
Project Steering Group Escalate To be managed by Project Steering Group
10
P
r
o
je
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Optimistic programming Subcontractors not available Delay to contract M VL 5 25 45% 7
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Avoid Management Plan
11
P
r
o
je
c
t
T
e
c
h
n
ic
a
l
Insufficient protection provided to
trees
Trees damaged during construction Additional costs/delay to contract L VL 1 5 25% 1
O
p
e
n
Main Contractor Escalate To be managed on site.
12
P
r
o
je
c
t
T
e
c
h
n
ic
a
l
Impact of temporary works on
existing highway network.
Long traffic delays on highway network.
Poor PR for HCC and additional costs
to provide extra temp traffic
management systems
H L M 12 8 12 200 500 60% 210
O
p
e
n
Lead Design (MC) Manage
Prepare Traffic Management Plan and consult with area
office and co-ordinate works with other work in the area.
Total 375
Response Plan Key Tasks *
Root Cause/s *
(Known factors/ weaknesses)
Risk Event *
(What might happen if not corrected)
Consequences *
(Impact on scheme objectives/
WBS requirements)
O
w
n
e
r
W
B
S
/ D
is
c
ip
lin
e
BRT Tichborne Way to Gosport Ferry
Risk Register
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y

(
A
v
o
id
, T
r
a
n
s
fe
r
,
M
a
n
a
g
e
, E
s
c
a
la
te
,
A
c
c
e
p
t)

*

Current/ Baseline Scoring QRA
S
t
a
t
u
s
*

(
O
p
e
n
,A
c
k
n
o
w
le
d
g
e
d
,T
r
a
n
s
fe
r
r
e
d
,C
lo
s
e
d
,Im
p
a
R
is
k
O
w
n
e
r
*

STEP 2: Assessment (current)
R
is
k
ID
Project Risk Register, BRT Tichborne Way to Gosport Ferry_(HF000004264873)