This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
I named a judge within this court, Zoss, for asking The People to pay him and Obama tribute and for writing exact lies in his ruling and order. And NO, you are not reading a threat, as all I did was cite the correct application of the law: 1 st you dissolve the legal bonds and then you abolish the dead institutions. At least three elements needed to constitute a threat are missing; this never constitutes a threat. Plus: The authorities who are no longer legal, named authorities due to their default on 11/05/08 would first have to establish they possess a constitutional basis to act and to do that? They have to prove Barack Obama was and is duly elected as he qualifies and we all know – he is not as he does not. I, Susan Herbert, complain: 1. I was born on December 30th,1967. 2. Every single solitary right was violated until I was murdered. 3. I survived my death. Every court is denying The People, represented by my person, an appearance in person. I happen to be one of The People, forced to become the authority as not one person could or would make the case for women. I’m also forced to enter over 100 pages as male judges keep lying and claiming the Declaration, Revolution, Constitution and 19th Amendment, Bush V Gore and In Re Susan Herbert 08-6622 do not exist American history never happened - thus I entered insufficient fact and no arguable basis. A lie. Federal judges seem to believe if they write it then it is never a lie and/or a crime. Wrong, so you see the conundrum: A conflict exists equality does not. 4. The crimes committed against my person and my children’s persons include attempted rape, robbery, assault, battery, child abuse, emotional abuse, starvation and the criminal denial of my right to vote. THE VOTE, the founding cause. 5. Every officer of this nation participated as did every citizen with the most heinous acts of all committed by the Judiciary of this nation. Do the fact checking yourself as my name is all over the record of this nation state and federal. Judges knew exact dates, names, times and places and then chose to participate or to 1
aid and abet the perpetrators in order to protect personal, disgusting, selfish interests. I do not care what their reason is as nobody can ever claim they had any legal reason so anything that comes out of their mouth or their pen except exact truth is a federal crime that now escalates to treason as I am the one and only citizen to outwit the federal vampires by: 6. Authoring a Supreme Court petition, a case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction that overturns another such case, Bush V Gore, as it is bad case and was entered and decided wrongly. MY petition is pro se unlike any other authority case thus it meets the strictest standard of all: HISTORY. No opinion, no suggestion, no doubt whatsoever. Police reports, hospital reports, court reports, Navy records, school records - you name it - with first person eyewitness testimony of the events. A living witness to back every report up, as that is then indisputable, incontrovertible, absolute proof. HISTORY. You know what else it contained? The Declaration and Constitution. 7. Susan Herbert then became the one and only American with the power and authority to kill a federal judge and then never spend a single day in jail as no criminal prosecution is possible as Susan had an idea: If I need to kill a federal judge or any other federal agent in order to then secure justice, how do I do it in such a way that it constitutes self-defense and national defense thus a Revolution? I knew: Author a petition to SCOTUS as natural birth is our means to then wage war as we were born in war so that when SCOTUS directly acts upon it then is exactly what the Declaration is: It constitutes service; it dissolves the bonds thus I may now shoot and kill a federal judge. 8. Bad news Sioux City: not one judge objected. Not one. You had three chances and not one of you did anything. A Justice can’t lift a finger to help you. You know what a Justice has to do? Sit back and wait for me to shoot. You act upon the document thus making it real. All I had to was engage SCOTUS until SCOTUS acted w/o the US ever responding as that then is my permission to fire, as once SCOTUS does that? It has acknowledged the contract is breached and the federal judiciary did it when they had zero reason other than profit, whether it was money, comfort or flattery.
9. Here’s a fact to consider: You’re a Founder only it’s 2007 not 1776. There is utter lawlessness as a president committed perjury but was not convicted, a president was installed in violation of the law and a foreign man was installed to make the injury to women permanent, women have a right to die only and forever, but not to life as our vote has never had any legal power and will never as we were kept out of the offices of Chief Justice and Executive. We have a right to war against the institutions to abolish them, so how do I dissolve the bonds to then take out that first constitution as my judgment is it is dead, as dead as the institution? 10. Go ahead, try me, as you know as fact that The People have a right to war against the government if it is unjust. John Marshall said that day was here when redress for the violation of a fully vested right was made impossible. Maybe you’re not smart enough to do it and maybe you’re not courageous enough to do it and maybe you’re not wiling even if you could but I am. I actually wrote: ‘I want and need justice so I will kill a federal judge.’ I wrote a lot of things. I made certain SCOTUS knew this is it. If federal judges are the reason, the single reason that justice is no more? You restore justice by going to a Justice, telling him or her you’re taking out a judge and then when you do? Justice is again. Get it? You enter SCOTUS directly, direct action is taken, you leave w/o remedy and relief so then you claim it your self by acting upon your declaration: You act to kill a federal judge. Your action then is proof. Revolution as when they try to haul you into court? The justices had to read what I wrote as only a Justice can address an emergency application and as mine was acted upon by John Roberts? John Roberts said, “Susan is correct.” His ACTION or his agent’s action is the proof. He can’t grant or award me your death; to be a legal act of war upon the government, dissolution and then abolishment, I write the petition up and I act upon it once Roberts signs it as we will hang separately or together. His action is his signature. Petition 08-6622, 11/20/08, the day the death warrant was signed. All that matters is it is directly entered and acted upon and then I’m liberated to do it. 11. If he granted anything it then is paper and that’s no good. The Founders served Britain. Then what? The King did not accord them any paper. The Declaration was it. It’s signed; it’s delivered; now they act upon it. As I do not have any king then WHO do I serve? John Roberts. Roberts says: 3
The die is cast; Susan must submit or triumph. No matter how it came to be all I had to do was prove the Republic fell and then force SCOTUS via emergency application to address the breach of contract. 12. When SCOTUS denied 07-9804 I had them: “You violated Marbury thus I have you as you just reasoned yourself out of existence.” Those clerks promised to “sink” the case thus suppressing the fact of what they did to me and my kids. They told me my life was worth nothing. Now I had them. I then entered 08-6622 directly as you can’t and may not violate Marbury; it’s claiming no woman can ever, ever secure redress and/or actual justice and then claiming no person can ever act pro se w/o a law license thus it violates several dozen prior SCOTUS rulings. Proof: Carhart, Castlerock and Schiavo: No justice and Carhart and Schiavo ruled wrongly not in error. No justice for women even if you do secure redress as they NEED to hear me in person as only I can do that. I’m the case. no other person ever will have the case for women no matter how hard you look. You’ll get ruling after ruling and never secure justice as you’ll never have the correct application for every point at once. You have to cover at least 25 applications, all equal protection and due process. 13. 08-6622 enters directly with zero lower court activity. Upon denial? I inform the clerks: “If you did this you might fry as you just signed your own death warrant. Violate Marbury and still offer no relief? You plead guilty once you placed it on the case conference list as you MUST have merit to get there and so one Justice was supposed to read it. Did they? It matters not. The Justices at fault if the clerks are wrecking people’s lives and even killing them. If you’re summarizing these cases and so bad cases and even noncases are entering? Where are the Justices and why do they not know this? I know why: I happen to be the smartest person on the planet right now. Go ahead: Give me anything you got and you still won’t beat me.” 14. NY State interfered – they illegally heard a family court action filed while 08-6622 was being heard – in order to hide what the county and appellate court did. Those involved thought they could injure me in such a way they’d incapacitate me. I used NY instead. I managed to get Linda Griffin to certify me “forever pro se” after NY couldn’t find a lawyer as every lawyer that touched it knew something criminal and sinister went on in my 4
case. Griffin went so far as to phone a lawyer and convince her I was GUILTY – there’s no such thing in family court - and then try to assign her to me. The lawyer ‘fessed up when I pointed something out to her: “Someone convinced you that I’m guilty as what you are saying never happened. If I did what you keep claiming why wasn’t I arrested? You keep saying I did it. Yes, I did, but if the REASON is that reason why wasn’t I arrested? My REASON was not that reason. Now, can you defend a person whom you truly believe is guilty and when guilt is not an issue in family court?” She fell out. You can and may do something that MIGHT be illegal depending upon your reason. So her told her that reason, which is not written down anywhere? The judge phoned her. Gotcha! 15. In 08-6622’s ‘rehearing’ I informed SCOTUS (not exact words): “I am now “forever pro se”, a first ever legal designation. That means NY decided that for all eternity I will be my own lawyer as not one person ever will be able to represent me. Correct, as only I was there for all events being discussed in court filings. No other person, as they are third parties, was there for it all and no attorney was. That solves a problem. Every state would ignore or deny all fact and then even all law as MY ATTORNEY entered it not me. The third parties entered zero evidence, zero proof and no case law and won over my airtight, rock solid case, as judges played games and took money. Now it’s all history, first person eyewitness testimony. You, the clerks and judges, are now guilty. I may shoot. Go and do it: Deny my kids are not with me; deny the Revolution happened; deny that Obama was illegally elected or that he’s a lawyer, that he he signed 511 or he’s a foreigner. As you refuse to believe I am smarter than you are then you will get a rude awakening.” And they did! The clerks took up and Article 3 argument to avoid having to do what they must, what they are compelled under our law. So then when they wrote me an official letter citing Article 3 as their excuse not to their duty, a reason they could, would and did violate the Constitution, an excuse that always worked before, I answered their argument:: 16. “You just cited Article 3. Okay: The legal conundrum no person could ever get around to address the Judiciary is Article 3. You had to be able to equal yourself to the Chief Justice and President with one vote i.e. Executive order. You obeyed my Executive Order thus acknowledged it as legal and binding in both 07-9804 & 08-6622. Now you said that you 5
CAN’T act due to Article 3. You found me in violation of article 3. Nope. You can and may act; you’re not going to as you have always used this excuse and it always worked as no pother person could ever overturn a case of o.j. As you know the one and only thing you may not do is fail to act? You’re guilty not me. What I did to you was level the filed by equating you to me as a VOTER a lone citizen. You keep saying, “I’m a clerk not a voter.” And that my friend is a violation of EP&DP. We’re both voters; we both have one vote. You keep saying, “No I’m a clerk. I have more than one vote thus do not have to do this only as I’m a clerk.” Why and how are you different than me? As you’re a man? A clerk? The law is zero favor and zero special privileges. The minute those clerks or the Justices denied me they then came tumbling down. They became citizens only as I came to be around or outside of Article 3. If I have to do it, it’s an absolute duty, then you have to do it. As they actually sent me a letter citing Article 3 to then avoid it as they knew it was as fact w/o question criminal? I am golden. 17. IF THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT PROTECT ME THEN IT DOES NOT FIND ME. You CAN’T cite Article 3. You CAN’T deny any motions. Oh, you can try. You can write it down. But then I’ll keep a list and when the commission is finally adjudicated? You’ll fry for treason. I’ll act to make the commission real - I’ll shoot - and so you’ll try to criminally charge me. You won’t be able to; it’ll go all the way back to SCOTUS. You will have to admit “she told us all of this and we did this” or “We refused to believe that she could outsmart us”. You decided to deny me and my kids any and all protection of the law. You then colluded and conspired to harm us, and then all women and children, together or alone. 18. A copy of an actual letter I sent to SCOTUS, to the clerks and Roberts: “The Justices and clerks of the Supreme Court may not cite Article 3 of the Constitution as a reason to commit what is a crime. No law, US case law, precedent, code, rule, or legal policy exists to protect the employees of the Supreme Court and/or grant them blanket immunity nor does the Supreme Court have a fully vested interest or right to invoke the law as weapon in its defense. By its very nature if the Supreme Court of the United States is now in a position whereby it must use the Constitution to defend itself it is admitting it has committed criminal acts as there is no other reason this Court would ever need to 6
invoke Article 3. It is being invoked to avoid what is a duty and to avoid accepting responsibility for past actions; it is being invoked against me and so against the law and not in support of the law or it’s spirit. Three times the Supreme Court had an opportunity to obey the law and to preserve it; all three times the Supreme Court instead chose to do the one thing John Marshall said the Supreme Court could never, ever do or else this nation would then be an unjust, lawless and dead nation: Deny a living person redress. SCOTUS may cite Article 3 in any other case save my own as I am unique and have received unique treatment not in accordance with any legal action undertaken in the US since our founding. SCOTUS treated me uniquely and there is zero reason for it other than what is false, manufactured, discriminatory, sexist, prejudiced and meant to protect employees of SCOTUS at the expense of this nation. It is now creating a brand new impossible standard: In order for a person who is not qualified to hold the office of Executive to be of the ability to then purchase the office of the Executive money and favor had to trade hands over and over from the lone citizens up to the Executive thus all offices under it are already sold. If a lower court existed in accordance with federal law the breach would not have occurred, as it would not be possible. I cannot go to a court that does not exist. You do recall SCOTUS did not exist for any woman arguing her own case or injury, nonlawyer, ethical citizen or my one person until I my own self created it by suing for breach? This Court may be of the mistaken belief that John Marshall’s application of US law is that it may act upon the knowledge contained in an emergency application that is a breach of contract suit for liability but then not file the suit itself. This Court, by acting on 11/20/08 to circumvent the Solicitor General aka the people and so enter the suit directly but never file it then: 1, Admitted the emergency exists; 2, Acknowledged the litigant made her case; 3; Committed what is coup; 4, Acted against the person who is the legal authority while protecting those in violation of the law, or, chose personal interest that our not our law; 5, Did nothing to stop crimes already in progress. The Supreme Court acted as if the law did not apply to its own persons nor did Marbury V Madison, that is, it acted as if in the case of Susan Herbert alone, it could ignore the Declaration, Constitution, Marbury and the rules. If it does apply to Susan than it does apply to SCOTUS; if it does not apply to Susan it does not apply to SCOTUS. It’s RECIPROCAL not arbitrary. If you want to be able to cite the Constitution you cannot violate it.
John Marshall clearly said: If the day ever dawns whereby a litigant who is a voter or natural born citizen makes it to the office of Chief Justice seeking redress for the violation of fully vested protected rights but is denied entry in person the US has become a nation of unjust men and not a nation of law. Unless treason and overthrow has already occurred under no other conditions would the Supreme Court be invoking Article 3 against any citizen who has a pro se case of constitutional authority in which the sitting but not legal President and Chief Justice is named so then the Supreme Court is acting to stand down this authority and strip all legal power and moral authority from this person in a treasonous manner. TREASONOUS as: all clerks owned the knowledge since early 2007 . Nothing grants the Supreme Court legal power other than their one vote, a vote the employees of this court willingly, knowingly and deliberately gave away as we know they all voted in this last election when it was being held against the law, when it constituted treason and after this Court refused to obey, uphold and enforce the law of the US and further not only violated Marbury but breached both governing contracts in order to deny a living person, me, redress of rights that had fully vested and are constitutionally protected. At the time I first pressed suit treason had not occurred. This court cannot now claim it did not know as I am pro se. My petitions or first person testimony is fact not allegation and not hearsay. I informed this court that a coup is papery or bloody and that it was acting to support this coup that was then underway. I informed this court if it allowed my unique and not legal treatment to continue w/o redress in person and then the 08 election to go forward then a situation would, as fact, develop that might become one that was beyond the control of myself or this Court; that is if what I knew to be happening was not checked the Supreme Court might find itself in a situation whereby it could do nothing other than to witness this nation implode. Unfortunately for myself and for the citizens who did not participate in this atrocious, outrageous and unconscionable behavior the worst case scenario has arrived. I, at one time, told this Court that it may no longer cite any lesser authority than Marbury; I was being generous by allowing it to cite Marbury as I truly believed this court could not know something. My belief has changed as conditions have changed. I will make an attempt to reason with you but apparently SCOTUS is not willing as David Souter proves so that I now believe
the court has no intention of ever obeying the law or Marbury in my case and that is a problem as my case is the Declaration and Constitution: SCOTUS threw its own rules out in my case as I made my legal argument. They did exactly what I said they had to do: Start rejecting me or returning documents or injuring me based upon the Constitution as this a constitutional authority case. I’m the authority not you as all you cite is code, rule or policy that does not apply and never did in my case. This letter is SCOTUS saying: Argue this – Art. 3 – against Congress when you come back. I argue it and Congress will win. The Supreme Court MAY NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT OR ARGUE AGAINST ME FOR WHAT IT CAUSED: LAWLESSNESS. Congress cited Resolution 511 as law by turning rule into law w/o anybody knowing. HOW? It sent 511 to the House Judiciary Committee who UPHELD IT AS LAW, AS LEGAL, MAKING OBAMA PRESIDENT VIA A DIRECT ACT OF CONGRESS IN VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF EVERY SINGLE ETHICAL CITIZEN ALIVE! It especially harms women and exactly me. IT MADE A LAW THAT APPLIES TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ONLY AS IN ONLY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS MAY BREAK THE LAW AND ONLY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS MAY BECOME PRESIDENT. BUT IT MADE IT A LAW BY NOT TAKING A VOTE BUT INSTEAD SENDING IT TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WHO MADE NO OBJECTION!!!! THUS IT NOW IS LAW VIA A DIRECT VOTE OF THE PEOPLE NOT A 3/4 VOTE OF CONGRESS. Now – If Congress took that ¾ vote would any sane American give ALL POWER to CONGRESS and ZERO POWER TO THE PEOPLE, TO THE EXECUTIVE OR TO THE JUDICIARY??? Would women or any citizen vote for a law that effectively makes it IMPOSSIBLE for any person to become the President ever unless she is a member of Congress, a Democrat or a Republican, a crook and unless she waits for him to drop dead as she can only get to VP and no higher as CONGRESS is a male majority??? And now always will be??? Just as SCOTUS will be? SCOTUS has been effectively killed; it is now dead in the water. CONGRESS controls it. Nothing it now decides is actually SCOTUS acting independently but CONGRESS acting though SCOTUS. Obama’s first appointment is the stake in SCOTUS’ heart. Rulings out of SCOTUS are arbitrarily obeyed or ignored. Now? As Souter has perfect timing? Too perfect? Anytime Congress or any private interest wants to act it merely uses the House Judiciary Committee instead of the actual, legal process.
Congress glass ceiling’ed all of us even John Roberts with nasty lawyer tricks and I’m the only one who did not buy it. House committees have RULE not law. This effectively made a House Ruling a LAW. This letter proves my claim: The law has been over thrown as it no longer exists as it no longer applies to MEN who are not members of Congress. MOB RULE IS NOW THE ‘LAW’ WITH THE MOB BEING CONGRESS. SCOTUS could not adequately defend itself against Congress as the law no longer exists for them as men who are ethical as when the Solicitor General of the US waived the right of all citizens even the clerks and Justices of this court as no objection was made as that objection takes the form of setting that woman or possible recipient’s case for oral argument. I never asked for a purple heart but I got one, didn’t I? I sacrificed myself on the altar known as SCOTUS as you were supposed to get a clue: In the bible? The man never kills the woman or the baby; he stops at the last second as God is trying to get him over an emotional hurdle: to do God’s will not his own. You kept on slaughtering us. Seriously, it is like being at Tenochtitlan in 1500. I’m waiting for the SCOTUS steps to turn red. I told you: Only God can kill the innocent as an act of God is just that and not an act of SCOTUS. Why am I being asked to repeat it? To die, survive, die and survive again? BECAUSE YOU MISTAKENLY BELIEVE I CANNOT. And now that I have? Another woman can steal my argument. If there’s no process and no protection Marshall said: Come to SCOTUS directly. I believe you do not personally like it that a girl made it here first. ONLY A GIRL CAN MAKE THIS CASE! Not may but can. Did a single citizen ever tell a soldier: You are frivolous and delusional as we are not at war and never were here or abroad? Pay an unjust tax and/or tribute and violate the honor bond or else DENIED AND DISMISSED! No soldier and no Commander ever suffered that as that is insanity. I’m not insane. I can argue Article 3 but if I do? Congress wins and is rewarded for its unconscionable actions as Congress finally found a way around SCOTUS and the it seems as if it is permanent. As SCOTUS is now aiding and abetting them, against its own self. Didn’t I ask you WHO harms his own self?
WHO does a clerk or Justice complain to if their rights are violated, a criminal act is committed against them or if it is made impossible for them to secure justice for their own person or a family member? There is only one person: The sitting President or the people. Congress eliminated those two options. The Justice Department can do nothing. The AG can do nothing. A US attorney can do nothing. The law or the US case law i.e. precedent would have to exist and it does not as of 11/20/08 nor does the vested interest or right as of April 2008. You refused to hear the case, remember? RECIPROCAL MEANS YOU PROTECT ME & I PROTECT YOU; YOU HARM ME & I’LL GET A PACK OF CITIZENS TO HARM YOU. They’ll volunteer as always to march on DC. People charged with the duty to uphold the law cannot by its very nature be in violation of it on their way into office. It causes actual mobs to form. I predict pitchforks, torches ’n all. This would be WHY mob rule is bad and not good. A mob is a mob is a mob. You can call it Congress; i know a mob when I see, hear and feel one. I have changed my mind: A Chief Justice may not act but refuse to file the paper and fail to hear the case orally or in person only as it contains details about him and other criminal activity afoot in the federal government. Why, that would make our chief a crook! John Marshall said if we ever got to the point where even one American citizen, a voter, was denied their right of redress at this level, Chief Justice, then we were a nation of unjust men and not of law. We now know the nation is run by unjust men. The only reason not to file that case? So that people would never know I went up against John Roberts and won. If you best the Chief Justice that makes you President. All that matters is me owning the knowledge and acting upon it. Other people will soon own it too. Or so I told NY. I leveraged NY against PA as NY cannot enter a contract with PA unless PA informs it and gets consent. The judge refused to call NY. How can PA then make NY a party? I told NY: “To prove whom actually unselfishly loved these kids? And that the states are guilty as well as the individuals? When these third parties threatened to murder me and my children and told me that they would hound me until I dropped dead of old age if nothing else I invoked the wisdom of Solomon. I let them go. I told my PA attorney to tell their attorney that I wanted to cut my children in half. I said, “Ask them to keep legal action in PA but the kids in NY as we all know they never lived a day in PA after November of 1998. They left PA and went into NY; Cate Austin’s own father even said visits began around
December of 1998 and that’s in the court record so they lied to the NY state police and Albany County Court in MAY JUNE and JULY of 1999, a full five moths later. Ask to divide custody as in one state has legal custody but another has physical custody as that then is a federal case. What kind of judge pretends he can’t count to 12 and agrees to cut a living child in half and what mother goes along with it?” The Austins, PA & NY, that’s who. And they made it a contract that became an order of the PA court. Did NY agree or did PA order this without NY’s permission and w/o NY knowing? Did PA call NY and ask NY “Can we, PA, split custody two ways so you get the kids physically but we get them legally?” ? Can NY be made to enter a contract against its will and w/o knowing if CATE AND DAVID AUSTIN, CHARLES & DAPHNE HERBERT & A LAWYER NAMED ARNOLD WEINSTEIN WHO HOLDS A PA LICENSE DO THE NEGOTIATING ON NY’S BEHALF AND THEY DO NOT HAVE THAT POWER AS NOBODY ELECTED THEM, THREE OF THEM ARE NOT RESIDENTS OR NY VOTERS, NOBODY INVOLVED AT THAT TIME HOLDS A NY LICENSE AS CATE FAILED HER TEST TWICE AND IT IS NAMED NOWHERE IN NY’S CONSTITUTION OR IN THE US CONSTITUTION? Nope. Seems to me NY may have an ax to grind against PA and Linda Griffin as my attorney argued this contract as invalid, on the Austin’s part as it never occurred to her PA cannot make NY a party w/o informing NY and getting NY’s consent as in calling Albany County and asking Albany County for consent on NY’s behalf because Albany already said NY DOES NOT CONSENT. I asked the judge to call NY. He said No, he could read but FIVE judges then came and went in only a few months as Susan was on to them in PA. BTW: In Griffin’s own court they said that my kids moved to NY in MAY so in JULY of 1999 they lied under oath to the Albany Court and lied to state police who I sent to their home to prove my kids were living in NY not in PA. CAN THE THIRD DISTRICT APPELLATE COUNT TO 12? AS MAY ALWAYS COMES BEFORE JULY. HOW THEN IS IT TRUTH AND FACT TO TELL NY IN JULY THAT MY KIDS DO NOT LIVE IN NY BUT THEN TELL LINDA GRIFFIN THEY DID LIVE IN NY THEN, AS THEY CAME IN MAY? IF THEY DID NOT TELL THIS LIE WHY THEN DID THE STATE POLICE NOT REMOVE THEM? THEY TOLD THE STATE POLICE MY KIDS WERE VISITING NY BUT DID LIVE IN PA THUS JURISDICTION WAS PA NOT NY, THE SAME LIE THEY TOLD ALBANY COUNTY. So how then did NY come to be involved? PA made or forced NY to be a party; the third parties then committed crimes to enforce it. Hell, I would have told NY in October of 2005: NY, PA violated the Constitution, both yours and the US’ if somebody did not find Greg Rinckey and ask him or otherwise assign him to my case…Now, Is agreeing to cut a child in 12
half no matter how you do it enough proof of injury, proof of harm and proof of death for the third district???” It is a matter of time before this directly harms you, as I do not control that. THE GOD controls physics. I only define it for you. God or this universe is always on the side of truth and righteousness. A Court and its Chief not filing the case only as a girl beat them is not what God wants as an all male universe cannot exist at some future point. See what happened to an all male government? It imploded. I know you feel as if, you believe you control the universe, but you do not. The decsions you make each day? God is not suprised by any of them and can counter them. I told you: A sort of homeostasis goes on. The universe respires exactly like a person; it thinks. An intelligent designer can plan for you. These days I know when SCOTUS is up to no good in my case: Actual chains start rattling. Then the mailman knocks. Susan. 19. I pitted myself against the ENTIRE federal government, every citizen and officer. I won. I essentially then came to rest “outside” the law so it is myself against all of you but in a court? You within the law. You have all the protection you want and need; you have all of it and I have none as you have all the power. You have violated every separation of power, every clause, every word. You are not a Republic. You’re all criminals and I’m the only honest, ethical person left. So now anybody who sides with me IS Constitutional and can and may shoot but you? You’ll try to convict us but it will not work. The whole world will find out. See why John Woo and Cheney were cooking up “camps” to put citizens in? Upon invoking military action against them? When any just government falls then the officers refuse to apply the law until finally the citizens act and so then the government must begin locking them up w/o trial, locking them up w/o any charge and even killing them al a Germany. The US did it by refusing to accord women justice and then granting all of their rights to foreign-born men like Kissenger, Delay, Swarzeneggar and Obama. I have zero rights and they have any right they make up? They can manufacture things like 511 to even say as I’m a woman I’m not natural born as a foreign born
man is??? Even McCain did it – a veteran - so now I have he most moral authority as he took them all down with him. 20. WE won the Revolution. The Declaration, Revolution and Constitution is all the jurisdiction and cause you need. It’s the arguable basis as women w/o any title or paper did not have legal power then and do not now. The Constitution trumps US code every time. That’s the authority; the paper authority is the law and the living authority is me not YOU. Paul Zoss has no clue so how can I reason with a person who has no idea what he is doing as he’s not smart enough to do it or he’s so arrogant he’s assuming the risk when he can never win? I took on SCOTUS alone and defeated it as all of them together aren’t more able. It’s not a choice to believe this or not as it is a fact of history: 21. I, Susan, am the smartest person alive on Earth now. That person lives somewhere. It could be a person in the rain forest. It could be a person in the Artic. What in the world makes you truly believe it is some egg headed man in a suit? What makes you think it is some rich, famous person? No, all they have is advantage and privilege I do not. Pretend the smartest person alive is in the Artic. What would they be doing? Whatever that society values or needs. They might never even set foot in any organized school. What if that person was black and living in Detroit? They might become a neurosurgeon or they might become a crackhead. A crackhead could be the smartest living person but we lost him as we couldn’t overcome racism, sexism and political corruption. What if the smartest living person is a woman who was subjected to horrific abuse and battery, incessant and unending? What if the Judiciary began participating, first as they had unjust policy, then as they took bribes and then as they REFUSED to accord her justice – no redress in person – as they would have to admit fault and even guilt? She’d end up dead, end up on drugs, go insane (end stage torture or addiction) or fight back. I found out that there’s one other choice: She’d secure everlasting life for making the case thus be rewarded by the exactly named Creator. It never occurred to me that to make the case you’d have to prove God – prove death as that became the standard for women and enlisted service members - thus have to meet the Creator.
22. The smartest person on the planet, if she is a woman and lives in the US, would do what that society values. Porn, prostitution and stripping. She’s smart not stupid. She’d be arguing government, science and theology, all male dominated and even all male fields as to secure justice she’d have to slaughter patriarchy now realized as criminal activity in the highest federal offices. She’d have to be the victim as she’d have to be the most victimized or she couldn’t know some answers; the correct application wouldn’t be hers. Then she’d have to take on SCOTUS all alone – as both victim and counsel – as that’s the only way to end the corruption and crime: a second Revolution. 23. She’d be smart enough to know that as physics, government and theology all came to a dead end that she needed to focus on the one thing they all missed. If law is law and so all three match then there’d be a law they must not know, maybe more than one, and then she could unite all three. Sounds like the missing or undefined law is within US law and that all three are then united in US law – if it’s elegant (all law came into existence with the universe; US law came into existence with the universe; we had to turn it into written form so law is but we then have to define it and write it down). 24. And every man and title would fight her as it then meant no more unjust privilege or overly broad power for anyone. People do not want equality; they only say they do. No federal judge wants to be equal to a litigant. You all like the unjust power and control you abuse. You like the feeling it gives you and the money and material goods it accords you. Let me tell you something: In a courtroom? ANY courtroom? The judge and the lawyers all know more than the litigants. You all have different knowledge but some of you have more. Some of you have expert knowledge; some of you have exclusive knowledge. You are all unequal; so who is at the biggest disadvantage? The woman litigant. Who has nothing but her vote as everything was taken from her. She had to become the best ever. And she did. And now you work double and triple time to keep her out or else she’ll blow the whistle on you and what you are doing. Problem is: The People finally had enough with Obama. Black victims have become victimizers and next up? Rwanda; Nazi Germany. The US will have a race war only it will be the ethical, those not in office, versus the unethical, those in office, so Cheney and Co had a reason to fear the citizens. I’m not Timothy McVeigh as he did not exhaust the legal process. I’m the 15
very first citizen to exhaust it thus we have no process or only undue process. If I blew up a federal building? I’d walk. LOL! I told the clerks and Justices in 09-677: We might be better off letting the military blow the building up with you in it. Did they call the Marshalls or Secret Service? No as they know I made my case; I won; they know I’m merely stating actual application of the law NOT making a threat. 25. All I’m doing now is making an attempt to then avoid violence as it’s not necessary IF a court will stop denying reality and hear us, The People, in person. You tell us: WHY or HOW do you inflict a person not qualified to hold the office on us in open and direct violation of the law as he can never get around or over signing 511? So federal judges then are forcing all The People who did not vote for Obama or McCain as they did not qualify or vote at all as they couldn’t to suffer him. How offensive can you be? How much cruel and unusual punishment can you dish out, especially to women? You deny me any and all rights, any and all protection whatsoever, and Obama then gets my right? A right not even his? Or if it was his a right he gave up when he committed a crime as he’s an expert and so he knew signing 511 is a crime? When he bought that seat via private money? Why can’t I buy it? I could as it’s for sale if you did not impoverish me to then keep me out. 26. The truth is: you do not want to now address the ugly mess you have created. You know as fact I made the case as you can all read the SCOTUS docket and so you are frightened. Too bad. I’m NOT a coward so why can’t I confront these people? Some of these people are my accusers. NY State said, “other [crimes] were committed” to justify a GUILTY verdict and the awarding of my kids to third parties. WHAT crimes? What acts? Name them. It refuses. Guilty? This is family court. There’s no such thing as guilty but NY did it. And now you let this go on and on, you let women be injured over and over and over by denying and ignoring the law applies to them until you created a mess so large it frightens you. 27. What th are you so afraid of? I’m the one volunteering to be shot not you. If I make this case I’m making myself the target. If you keep me out to avoid hearing me in person? Then you’re making yourself the target. And unfortunately for you: I’ve got the paperwork, the SCOTUS docket and 16
SCOTUS action, that let’s me walk away, as nobody can find me guilty. If you don’t protect me then you don’t find me. If you don’t accord me my right of redress or any right then you can’t charge me when I shoot you. If you ask me to pay that fee? It’s you trying to find me with Court rule. You’ve placed court rule above the Constitution. Above The People. You’re deliberately injuring The People with Court rule as if it’s the authority over them. Gross abuse of power. DICTATORSHIP. FOREIGNIZATION. 28. I’m going to teach Paul Zoss a lesson: A man once tried to convince me that he was smarter than me by citing his IQ was 185. LOL! I said, “My IQ is 250.” He said, “It CAN’T be. The test only goes up to 200.” LIAR! PROOF I, A MAN, AM SMARTER THAN YOU AS YOU DIDN’T EVEN KNOW WHAT AN IQ TEST GOES UP TO! So, he took my bait. “That’s interesting. I didn’t know that. Wow! I’m even smarter than the people who made up the IQ test.” Do you get this? Who can make up a test with a score going to 200 and then claim as absolute fact that you can’t be smarter, that you can’t have an IQ over that number? I, Susan, can’t be smarter than a piece of paper? As people made up the test yes you can – if you’re smarter than all of them put together. PLUS: If you only use about 10% of your brain, if most people only use about that much, what if you used 20%? Or 30%? So me and twenty men all score a perfect 200. Who’s the smartest? I’ll tell you who: The person who passes the only actual IQ test around: The person who makes the case for equal protection as you must complete the base of human knowledge for this Earth age, find or define the missing law/s and then unite it all. Then we evolve. It’s happening already: look at children. Autism is skyrocketing in boys as the injury is being inflicted before birth. Other children are born smarter and smarter, some with seemingly odd skills like extraordinary talents in one field. You’re seeing more prodigies but also kids with the ability to use their whole brain. The kids who escape the injury that is. I willed myself to power; I accessed more of my brain. I always had it but the injury kept me from using it as I was tortured. Some neural pathways were shut down by the injury while others never lit up. I healed that and then opened other pathways up thus I use more brain than you do, literally. I could always score 200 on an IQ test; I just couldn’t use like I should have been able to and I noticed that. The way I use my brain now? LOL! Einstein couldn’t keep up and it’s too damn bad and if you don’t 17
wanna believe it as you have the proof: The SCOTUS docket. A 1 st in history. What no man could do. 29. That makes me the brain trust of this operation. Like Jefferson or like Adams The People can’t afford to lose me. Someday very soon a person will shoot a federal agent. Federal agents like the Secret Service and federal Judges are criminally protecting Obama at our expense. Tribute. So a person will take out a federal agent exactly like we shot British soldiers. That person will be arrested. Upon arraignment? He’ll argue legal justification citing my SCOTUS action as first you dissolve the legal bonds and then you can abolish a dead institution – shoot an officer. That judge might place him in physical custody; he might not. Can and may you criminally find a person who has been denied any and all protection of the law even by SCOTUS, the Chief Justice, and the Executive? When all rights have been violated and not one authority would act to enforce the law? No matter how it turns out at some point the nation, THE PEOPLE, will be informed: The war is on; we can now shoot to kill as the crooks said they aren’t budging; they’ll harm us with impunity. 30. How are agents like the Secret Service, FBI or military ever going to reason their actions when they know what Marshall said: Disobey and defy illegal orders? What, you as a federal judge can’t read 511? You do not know Obama is sitting in violation of the law? If I know as I told you and I supported everything I said with hardcore proof then how did Paul Zoss not know??? Paul Zoss? I gave him something only the DOJ has: A clerk in the Supreme Court who was worried as to how all of this would turn out as they get the point of law and wondered if any justice had ever seen the case or if the clerks were hiding it, as they knew if a Justice read it then a Justice would act, sent me a piece of proof. He took it from the court, mailed it to me and I have it. I copied it and gave it to you, the DOJ and the US military. As I truly believe the Justices, especially Roberts, never saw the case but only the summary the clerks made or maybe not at all? If I shot and killed Paul Zoss then guess who could plead ignorant? The Justices as it is actual obstruction of justice – by the SCOTUS clerks. If you injure a Justice like this it is treason as you also injured the acting, legal President, me, and the natio, The People. You targeted women with deliberation. And didn’t the clerks say that they would and could do this? YES. As they had no idea what it would mean as they could not get over 18
the fact that they are not as smart as they believe they are. I warned them and they kept it doing it. They told me they would never get caught. I said, YES YOU WILL – WHEN WE GO TO WAR HERE. Never happened, never will they said. They said no woman could – it’s not possible for a woman to do what a man can’t - so no woman would, as they wouldn’t let her NOT as she didn’t have the ability. I said, “You morons. It did happen once. You keep telling me it never happened. What’s “it”? Women’s equality? A pro se woman arguing in person? A nonlawyer arguing in person? Right, all that never happened as you are deliberately keeping the case out. What you fuckers do not get is that it did happen once as if what we have to do is go to war against you thus fight another Revolution then we will as we HAVE to do so. If you say you’re not ever going to let us into the Supreme Court to secure protection of the law? Then we war. As long as only lawyers are allowed to argue then THE PEOPLE not just women can never, ever secure their rights as the office was foreignized. An actual foreign invasion happened so it is. Now WE, THE PEOPLE, can’t overcome it unless you allow us to appear in person in the Supreme Court but you said you will not allow the only person who can and will argue the case, Susan Herbert, entry. Why? Easy: The clerks assumed a risk – we can harm her and get away with it - and lost. So it is now the authority who rose and the authority THE PEOPLE, LAWFUL VOTERS, chose over the foreign government: Obaam and all crooks. You say you have a constitution. no you do not as you do not abide by it at all as you shut The People out and favored Obama. We have the original documents. If you then say you have the 1871 version as your Constitution? You did until the officers defaulted on 11/05/08. Right now it is I, Susan, The acting, legal President and Commander, with the Justices and The People, versus Obama and all others. The Justices aren’t obeying Obama. You can’t know which side they will choose until they hear me in person. Which side are you on? The People who obey the original documents and the Founder’s instructions, The Federalist Papers, or Obama’s, rule by a cabal of criminal lawyers and privateers not him? I’ll give you a clue as to whose side the Justices will be on once they choose: We know as absolute fact w/o question TWO Justices will choose I as the legal authority and The People as the constitutionally set government and not Obama: Scalia and Thomas are originalists.”
31. The clerks then have a good reason to be afraid of me. Every male clerk save one might be tried for treason and executed once my case is heard. I gave them an opportunity to secure immunity and they assumed more risk. Maybe you should fry or hang or be shot if you have proof you can’t defeat a litigant – she has beaten you every single time thus you have not been able to stop her and no federal agent is willing to arrest her when confronted – and you reason and decide: The People will never rise up against the institutions. We can do anything we went to them.” Never? You are aware we fought a Revolution, aren’t you? 32. Lawyers have been complaining about the clerks of SCOTUS for a while. Files go missing. Papers go missing. Cases aren’t filed. A clerk likes Obama? He plays games with a petition. Don’t like a case? Fudge what you write when you summarize it. In my case? As I sought to overturn a case of oj, an authority case, no clerk could touch it as only the Justices are qualified as it entered as an emergency application so no clerk ever summarized Bush V Gore. Clerks have zero power and authority to summarize such cases; only Justices may as the lawyer pressing it is equaling himself to the Chief Justice and Executive. If the clerk had the power and authority? If he had the human ability? He’d be pressing it! But we had a unique legal situation: Ask yourself: As a male clerk can never have a baby thus can never give testimony rising to proof of pregnancy, birth or woman, can he then summarize it? It’s humanly impossible for him to know it. As that is a male clerk claming he CAN and DID give birth to a baby! Or that he is a woman! I told these clerks that they would only prove what they did, commit treason, by interfering in the case but they thought they were tricky enough to outsmart me thus hide their actions from the public. Wrong. 33. The clerk claiming to be named Will said something interesting to me: When he told me the clerks would sink the case? He said he knew the elements to look for; he said it as if SOMEBODY ORDERED THEM TO ALWAYS SINK THE CASE FOR WOMEN IF THEY SAW IT. I’ve never been able to speak to a woman – ever. No woman touched my documents. I do not believe a Justice said this so WHO did? Where did that policy come from? Guess what? The Chief Clerk is named William. He’s ex military too. He would have reason to stop a woman from Commanding – he personally doesn’t like it. He’s about 70 years old. How 20
long has he been there? What if the Justices have no idea this policy exists and male clerks know about it, have been acting on it and have been enforcing it for years? What if at some point this decision was made, by him or by a former employee, and it’s gone on w/o anyone ever knowing until I was able to argue case law until he lost thus screamed it and hung up on me? He’s said the clerks could and would sink it; he said as if they had a plan. What if he himself wanted it sunk as he knew he was caught violating the rights of all citizens by me- no woman and no nonlawyers ever - and then enforced his own order? His own policy? Or what if it is merely accepted as fact w/o question and nobody outside the office ever knew? All you can do is order Roberts to appear and find out. Obama and I prove natural birth and Roberts awards the commission. SIMPLE. NO BIG DEAL. NO MESSY CRIMINAL CASE. No Justices testifying. 34. Federal agents and so every officer of this court works for The People. We own the institutions, the building, the computers, the judicial robes, the gavels, the actual bench and all of the paper. The only thing we do not own is you, the persons. Default is; the sitting officers defaulted and not one person working in this courthouse objected. Then the Judiciary itself defaulted when Roberts did. The Justices work for US, remember? Then the criminal element elected and installed Obama when this case had not had any appearance in person so we had not been heard thus The People had zero informed consent. Federal judges actively kept this case and all other Obama suits out of court. In my case what is being done is heinous as I alone have the case. To deny The People, the living people, any appearance but allow the paper entry? And when the highest court acted upon it proving it is the case and that we won? You are dead, as you have favored the dead institutions over life. Obama? If you participated in this election you are guilty if you knew and all lawyers knew but if you did not? Then you’re responsible as not only was I not allowed to appear to then inform the People but Obama REFUSED to reveal those documents so he actively denied the voters informed consent. The Voters said: If it is not true, if he was born here and never claimed to be a foreigner and never traveled on that passport as as foreign citizen then WHY won’t he release them? Nothing Obama says is true, it’s not reasonable, as he answers to the People not to his lawyers or his donors. To install and then protect a person who acted criminally BEFORE the election as he REMOVED the 21
statement regarding dual citizenship – that he was one as if it was legal to be one - from his own website and he signed 511 and then he used private money to buy the Office thus denied all natural born citizens especially women their rights and may have denied some of us our lives and when he knows exactly what he is doing as he claims to be a constitutional law professor and he was president of Harvard Law Review is then repugnant. If this court or any court wanted that fee? You should have asked long, long ago as I was in federal court in 2007. You should have asked and then heard the case in person. We can argue that fee; when I win? It’s called a criminal conviction and then you’re hung for treason as you knew but did it to The People regardless – you protected Obama’s paperwork and his lawyers instead of The People. 35. All those institutions we own? If you have violated every word of the two governing documents and now you have actually foreignized the office with a person who is a foreigner according to all evidence some of which rises to proof and that is entered to this court and if you also foreignized the office by allowing privateers to buy it via use of private money thus then give it to a criminal as 511 constitutes a signed confession then you would have no need of the commission: Our two original governing documents. Why do you need to own two documents that mean nothing to you and that you refuse to live out? You think if you possess them that then means you are those thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs. You do not own them, The People do. We own all of Washington DC. If the officers wanted to claim ownership as DC incorporated in 1871 then they had their chance and opted not to do so. They assumed a risk: It’s is common knowledge that no officer wants to publicly admit DC is a corporation due to that 1871 action so they avoid ever answering any sit addressing it. EVERYBODY knows this. So I outsmarted them as long as federal judges were going to let them hide by not answering and never forcing them to answer, as if they alone are above the law: you MUST answer an authority case. I’m the legal authority; you answer to me not to Obama or anyone else. You answer The People by answering to me. If you fail to answer an authority case? You have just told The People you are refusing to obey their order, a legal order that is valid and binding as proven by the SCOTUS docket – the court employees weren’t sp stupid as to disobey the Executive Order I issued no matter what else they did - so you know you must but are assuming the risk, as your belief is no judge 22
will ever make you answer to the Constitution so you’ll never suffer any consequences. So in defense of The People I took care of your tendency to run away and hide: Marbury V Madison says you can’t use default to then make redress for the violation of a fundamental, fully vested right impossible. If you do? All you are doing is proving the Republic is dead as you can’t be constitutional if you make redress impossible. Marbury itself is a pro se authority case thus precedent is set: You must answer. Appearance in person MUST happen. Why do you think Marshall heard it in person? In any pro se constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction the case must be heard in person as the constitutionally set government is The People not the paper. It’s not the federal judge; it’s the petitioner as he or she is acting in defense of the People. Marbury secured actual legal power, one vote, for all white men. See why the officers and lawyers want us kept out? So only they ever have redress; so only unconstitutional and repugnant things possess power and control. God forbid The People possess power and authority. So, why do unjust persons determined to keep The People out only to protect the criminal status quo need the two governing documents? They do not. If it is something that is the property of the fed? The People own it. Personally I’d let you keep all of it but the Smithsonian, the Library of Congress and the two documents (the National Archives is a part of the National Museum). Ultimately that’s up to The People. But we’re not going to let those criminals in DC spit on our Founders or wipe their feet on the two documents; we’re here to adjudicate that commission to then have it delivered to us. The People chose me as their representative. The sitting officers, privateers and others chose Obama. 36. If The People had the good sense to choose the most intelligent living human being alive, a person who is a woman and a mother, and who proved her ability and capability by accessing SCOTUS directly and forcing SCOTUS to act, thus forced the sitting officers to default, and who has the most moral authority and you, whoever you are, chose a name on that invalid ballot or Obama himself, and keep supporting Obama and the Congress no matter how obvious it becomes that you were lied to as US sovereignty is going out the window – hello North Korea! You made a president bow down to you - and Obama has not once acted alone to exert and/or exude authority, that he is not in charge, and if you yourself see it all over and read about it in every magazine and paper now that his 23
facade is crumbling as now he has to actually do the job, and when previous, serious supporters are bailing, then that’s your proof: You are not reasoning your vote. So, The People chose me as their representative and chose well, thus you are denying us any and all appearance in person only as you chose poorly so we’ll win not you? Here’s a clue: As we are all to be living out the two governing documents we are all to be on the same side. There’s to be no winning and losing. If there is? You’re foreign. If innocent people are dying because of you and your failure? You’re a criminal. So you have just persons headed by Susan Herbert pitted against unjust persons headed by Barack Obama. And Obama does not have to answer to the just persons? According to all law and case law he does. 37. If we win and he and his cronies insist on remaining in office? We’ll do what we’ve been doing: Act as the constitutionally set government as we do not NEED the trappings but will not let them have those two documents. We’ll keep convening exactly as we have been. The unjust persons are using those documents to then convince people that they are legal when they are not. Go ahead: Live in the Whitehouse. But you’ll have to do it w/o the paper governing documents. And guess what else? I’m appearing w/o any paper: No notes, no books, no written arguments. I’m appearing by myself, as my own person is all I need. I can defend the black firefighters, the American Indians who seek to address the Ft. Laramie Treaty, the pro-lifers and pro-abortionists, teen sex leading to teen pregnancy, the state of LA’s argument re the death penalty for child rape, Terry Schiavo’s family, Jessica Gonzales daughters, “gay rights”, the Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq veterans, the separation of church and state, atheists, etc .etc. etc. You name your problem and I can solve it, as I can and will defend you. I can’t give you what you want but what you need: The truth. The correct application and all of the actual reasons why. There’s actual reasoning why those black firefighters are having such a hard time passing that test; it’s not how they study the material. Foreign policy, as you’ve convinced the citizens its “good”, a qualification to act as president, and that it somehow proves ability when all it does is force us to become foreign? I’ve got foreign policy you can’t beat. I do not need any paper as I’ve got my own ideas. If it is your intellectual property, why would you ever need to read from paper? You own it or you don’t. Scalia said: Do not read us your brief. Do not read us your petition. Tell us what 24
we don’t know. I thought: That would take ten years. Obama can show up with anything he wants, as much paper as he needs, but not with lawyers as he is one. I’m not. It’s not fair; it’ll never be fair; Obama would need twenty college degrees to equal me so let him bring all of the paper he needs. 38. Do you not see and hear the criminality in keeping The People out of a courtroom, a physical place, they own? If anyone should be kept out it’s the crooks. But we have law that we obey and enforce. It’s our courtroom; we’ll enter it. We have at least 16 grand jury indictments we need to enforce. As they arose from American common law they meet the strictest standard as The People acted to secure them when all authorities failed. The most moral authority as The People went by the book; they followed the named process. This is not going to become France as we aren’t French, we abhor bloodbaths and I’m the People’s duly elected leader as I received two legal votes while not one other candidate did. You know how you know they are legal? SCOTUS upheld them by acting upon them directly after they were entered directly. From The American Grand Jury itself as they should be able to enforce those indictments via my person once that happened but the Federal Judiciary does not understand that power is not theirs to give or take away so we have to fight on various fronts: Re: Grand Jury Presentments Defendants: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi Docket Number: Misc. No. 09-346 (RCL) Judge Lamberth,
The sin of the people is to lose faith in their Constitution. The sin of our Judiciary is to procrastinate while enforcing the Constitution.
American Grand Jury
Judge Lamberth, apparently procrastination is now in full force and effect in your Court. How serious does a Constitutional crisis have to become before the Judiciary will act? Is the workload of the Judiciary so overwhelming that the Constitution has to wait in line to receive recognition or service? 25
Barack Obama has committed serious crimes against our Nation. The evidence is well documented and published. Barack Obama has admitted in public and his writings that his father was not a US citizen. Clearly, Obama can never qualify as a “natural born” citizen. The Constitution states that only a “natural born” citizen shall be eligible for the Office of the Presidency. It is so simple a 10 year old child can grasp the truth. Yet power and corruption would seek to quash and deny the truth to the People of the United States. Does the Justice system in this country think that most citizens are so ignorant that they cannot understand a simple clause in the Constitution? Your Honor, we would imagine these statements are not what you wanted to hear. Matter of fact, we understand that our statements probably make you angry or make you want to reprimand those that challenge your Court or authority. Well, your Honor, get in line. Many are now challenging your intentions. It is now estimated that 60% of Americans want to know the truth about Barack Obama. He has spent close to 2.0 million dollars fighting something like 15 civil lawsuits to hide the truth about his citizenship. Each time a Judge says this is a “jurisdictional” issue or a “standing” issue the People want to throw up. The day the Constitution or the People no longer have jurisdiction or standing in this Country is the day the Judiciary can no longer be trusted to defend or administrate the laws of our land. Time is no longer a luxury the Judiciary can afford to waste. Before the Court is a 21-page document that charges Barack Obama with “Eligibility Fraud and Treason.” It further charges Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi with “Conspiracy of Election Fraud.” These are extremely serious criminal charges that must be heard before the Court. If Obama can produce a valid Birth Certificate proving that he was born in the United States, and further prove his birth mother and father were citizens of the United States, then the man’s name will be exonerated and the case closed forever. But this proof has never been offered and the people have the right to know. Obama no longer has the right to conceal the truth, not when it concerns a blatant criminal violation of the Constitution. The charges have been levied against the man. The question is, what is this Court going to do about it? Judge Lamberth, we fight evil by exposing it. Once the truth is known, evil has no power over you or your Court. The People of this country are a lot stronger than the government would lead us to believe. The talk that our Country could never
survive an election scandal is simply an excuse. The truth of the matter is this Country cannot survive an attack on the Constitution by a public criminal when the Judiciary fails to do anything about it. American Grand Jury and its members have gone to great lengths to study the evidence and hand down our Presentments. We have served your Court with these Presentments and responded to your Orders. It is now time to act. Talk is cheap and words become meaningless if Judges such as yourself are in a position to act but fail to do so. Judge Lamberth, we wish you a Happy New Year. We know the decisions before you are not easy. Nothing in life is easy. Our Country was founded on courage, conviction and action. May the Lord guide you in your decisions, may He bless you with strength and courage. Respectfully, American Grand Jury
39. The latest piece of dead paper coming out of this court says that not one party is related to the state of Iowa. Did Barack Obama receive one vote from any Iowan? Yes. Do any of my supporters live in Iowa? Yes. Do we have a single secret service agent in Iowa? Yes. Do we have a US Marshal in Iowa? Yes. Do I or do I not have another case sitting in Iowa re Obama? Are the Austins, the third parties, Democrats who voted for Obama? Yes so they DO have a relationship with Iowa – the relationship being the Constitution. Does Paul Zoss, who signed the ruling, know he is not God or has no one ever bothered to inform him? Or is it that he has no idea whatsoever as to what an authority case is or means? Notice he changed his answer to no person is related to Iowa, as he knows he saw lots and lots of proof for me and against the Austin’s including the family court ruling proving the Austin’s breached the contract which he can’t deny with his standard line so he needed more to make it seem as if. Proof mo sane person can deny. A licensed lawyer enters with much less, at times with nothing. Would Zoss ask Ronald Reagan to pay a court fee or claim he is not related to Iowa if he filed on behalf of The People while he was acting as the legal president? No as his peers would laugh at him. Does Paul Zoss know that I’m his peer and that unless he can produce a 27
SCOTUS docket with his name on it as both counsel and victim then he’s not my peer as a federal judge as I outrank him? That he is not qualified to JUDGE anything as if he was he’d then know this is about JUSTICE? He might want to learn what vertical checks and balances are as he has just proven he is unfit to serve but somehow got to be on a federal bench. So now it’s: Herbert V Obama, Roberts and Zoss, or, The People versus The Institutions. Now, how long do you think The People will take it before they act? 40. What the Federal Judiciary fails to comprehend over and over: You truly believe you are safe from any and all consequences as you have a lifetime appointment and the Congress will not impeach you. Who ever told you that your lifetime appointment meant for the duration of your natural life? Let Congress fail to impeach. Your lifetime appointment then is only good for the lifetime of the Republic. That’s means you’re running on borrowed time as the legal bonds were dissolved on 11/04/08 when the unethical and criminal voted for Obama and this was then made real on 11/05/08 as all of the sitting officers defaulted. SCOTUS then confirmed this by entering me directly and acting upon me directly. It matters not if the clerks did it. No legal relationship now exists – it is dissolved - thus we can and may start abolishing you, the dead institutions. 41. So Sioux City: Are we going to shoot and kill one of you? Should I write to SCOTUS and say, “First time it is Crispus Attuks. Second time it’s Paul Zoss.” [If you then lose the war you are not known as an American martyr so you need to consider this. This time The People would shoot the blackcoats and the three piece suits, the sitting officers, as they defaulted and we won the orderly transfer of power but now pretend it never happened.] 42. Moral authority. I own it but you don’t. You can do what you know you are required to do by law, HEAR THE CASE, or you can play a game with your life. If you’re a person who will only come to be reasonable thus acknowledge the truth of your actions when a bullet is being drilled into your skull thus you then know “I shouldn’t have written that; I knew better; this isn’t a joke” then play some more games as you aren’t harming me but only you. I’m only here as The People want to do this w/o violence if they can. I don’t think that’s possible. I know that you have been acting as 28
you do your whole life thus truly believe it is acceptable. You believe we all do it. Your one of those people who was taught to lie in the womb, who never suffered any consequence and who was rewarded for doing the wrong things. You believe you are invincible and that as if you are the standard, as if as nothing like this ever happened before then it never will. 43. In kindergarten I met you: every kid in my class lied about their person when I was set up to fail. My teacher wanted to know who was the strongest kid in our class. She said open this latch. Everybody couldn’t. About half the kids went to try and then I tried; as no other kid could I gave it all I had. I nearly ripped that latch right off of its foundation. I was stunned. I heard that teacher say, Who’s strong in this class? I thought, I am! That latch was a joke. Nobody could open it? So the other kids try. Nope, not one kid. That’s crazy. So I ask the other kids. They told me that they pretended that they were weak. They pretended they couldn’t open it. Why would you ever lie about your person, about what it was good to be? They said, As we did not want to be blamed. For what? The crime. That teacher asked who was the strongest not who was guilty. Those kids were being taught to lie about their person – at age five. So their parents did it. Thus I know how all of you got your start; I know liars, fakers, pretenders when I meet them in person or on paper. It takes practice to become Bill Clinton or a criminal federal judge. If you started at age 5? Good, as you just met your match – your equal and opposite force and who is not afraid of you at all. Like I told those kids: innocent people do not feel guilty. If I have to shoot a federal judge as they bound and determined to keep violating us? I’m not gonna feel even so much as an ounce of guilt as I’m not. 44. Women in the United States of America are dying at the hands of state and federal judges and state and federal court clerks. SEE SCHIAVO as proof is proof. Did a SCOTUS ruling kill her or not? I blame the LAWYERS for her husband as they argued, “I, a man with unclean hands want justice so need to murder an innocent woman.” Word it anyway you wish as I heard their argument loud and clear. I can even name their motivation and intention as they do not know it but I heard them say it. As I did? A violation of Article 4 Section 4’s “domestic violence” clause as women are not protected from domestic violence at all and are now the victims of federal authorities who perpetrate it including the Chief Justice and 29
Executive himself: Two offices that have been exclusively male since our founding and this is the reason for the first violation of Article 4 Section 4’s “domestic violence” clause, Bush V gore, which caused our Republic to fall. LAWYERS did it. GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY! 45. As every judge in this court is a lawyer? You CAN’T adjudicate this case as an insurmountable conflict now exists as SCOTUS violated the separation of powers in 1790 and has never, ever allowed nonlawyers entry in person and then allowed me direct entry on paper only thus favoring paper over people when THE People are their clients NOT lawyers plus favoring lawyers is a violation of equal protection and due process and targets women and children ONLY as the one lawyer who can aid them thus make their case, SCOTUS’ case and the case for the military, all injured by LAWYERS, MEN and Bush V Gore is I, Susan, and I avoided receiving a law license with forethought and deliberation as if I had that paper license then I would be making the case for LAWYERS and more DEAD PAPER thus would lose my standing in SCOTUS. That is because in the US were supposed to be equal but aren’t and as this case hinges upon MORAL AUTHORITY or WILL. You have zero moral authority if you know lawyers are perpetrating a crime all over American as are law schools and bar associations and some of these persons are judges as then you are participating in what you to be criminal and so when you go before that judge? You CAN’T pull rank which is a necessary element of this case. It is called chain of command theory. SEE THE US MILITARY, NAVY, BOB M, JAG, MAYPORT or See the Secretary of Defense that I hired as I’ll introduce you to him. He is ex-military, special ops and a Vietnam veteran. 46. There’s lots of conflicts as this injury is now multiplying exponentially but the most recent conflict that I know as fact to be insurmountable is: PAUL ZOSS, a judge within this court. The problem is I am an expert in the field of human psychology and he knew that yet he refuses to acknowledge this or any fact and as I am an expert I can ask Zoss one question which he can never, ever answer. Why? If he answers YES then I cite what is WRONG with his answer; if he answers NO then I cite what is WRONG with his answer. There’s only yes or no. He can and may pull his best lawyer tricks out but it is yes or no. So then: He needs to be locked up in a mental institution or a jail. Kathy Shumney, Dr. Robyn Waxman and Dr. 30
Laurel Northup taught me most of what I know about psychology as they once described a form of denial that runs so deep it is often the hardest disease to cure. It can even be dangerous if you accidentally say certain words to the person in denial. In their experience they had not found that people with this specific form of denial were so sick they belonged in hospitals but jail – if they took it that far as they knew on some level but did it regardless. I truly believe Zoss has this exact disease. I truly believe if we haul in my experts they will agree as they will point other same thing I will: The magistrate judge is Paul Zoss; Paul Zoss is this person, who testified he is Paul Zoss; the name on the ruling in question is Paul Zoss therefore he is guilty in my opinion not mentally ill and not insane. Why? 47. I’m willing to teach you as every judge I have ever met seems hell bent upon making me believe that the law of the US does not apply opt them or to any officer – certainly no lawyer – and no matter how many times I point out that if you tell me that the law does not apply to you then you are telling me that you, an expert, know the law contains an equal protection and due process clause, that the separation of powers is clearly delineated and contains zero special privileges for judges and/or lawyers but you are going to try your best to convince the public, The People it does thus it is like you are saying ‘Watch me assault and batter The People by violating Article 4 Section 4 as many times as possible and then when I finally kill somebody and I know it I’ll attack the paper by making all the law I want within my rulings.” All the tricks that have always worked, I mean since we first came over on the Mayflower, DO NOT work with me but judges keep trying and then try in such a way they prove they are delusional in the medical sense of the word. Ego rises and federal judges who are nothing more than bullies dressed up in judicial costumes seem to be hell bent upon proving they can do something to stop me or kill me and as it always, always worked when I warn them it will not on me they then choose to take that chance regardless. And when they do they give themselves up. Usually this takes a few entries but as I already entered SCOTUS directly? One ruling is all it takes. US law is physics and theology as nay actual law of the universe is also a law of the US found within our declaration and Constitution as law is law is law. Oh, you can label it law but is it? If it is inalienable thus a right and so a law then you will find the physics and the theology to match it exactly. You can also distill the Declaration and Constitution down to equations and then even a 31
single number. The physics is equilibrium, a state, thus if you write anything that is a lie? I gotcha! That lie will reach out from your head and then your pen and pass by me and come right back to sting you. The Republic fell so your going own by your own hand as you participated in it’s destruction with forethought and deliberation and you had motive, intent, means and opportunity as well as you’re a lawyer. If any of that was absent? It would not be possible for whatever you write to then come back and harm you. If what you wrote is lawful, fact and correct, THE TRUTH, then I appear in person in court. 48. I keep saying it but judges keep playing dumb: if you’ve never, ever seen a constitutional authority case of o.j. that overturns another case of o.j. then how the hell would you know more than the woman who is it as she successfully pressed it as PROVEN by her name appearing on the SCOTUS docket? That slams into your ego like lightning. They can’t believe a woman would enter their court and say that their law license is a canker and that she is not impressed as she is not your equal but your better as until or unless your name is on the docket as an authority case then guess what? You’re not the authority and you are not even A authority as if you were? Then you, a federal judge, would have known Bush V Gore for what it is. Paul Zoss? 49. He said: ‘plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over this matter’. As of BVG it’s every man for himself as the Republic is no more and then you voted in a foreigner you’re now protecting at The People’s expense – Zoss defaulted in 2000 as he used to be one of The People and then on 11/20/08 as he’s an officer – so Zoss said I failed to demonstrate to he himself ‘sufficient fact’. Paul Zoss you have yourself to blame: I listed this fact: Susan, Jefferson, A Summary View, Declaration, Revolution, Constitution, The People, Marbury, vote, BVG, natural birth, Obama. That’s way more than sufficient. If you placed all of the fact I listed in the documents and attachments? I used my brain so I entered every fact of Earth we know since the universe was born. To keep him in line I attached the SCOTUS petitions as he can deny he knows every fact of Earth and I can’t challenge that or we’d be here at least a trillion years proving he’s lying so I entered an official record no judge in the US can ever deny: The SCOTUS docket itself. I knew he’d pull this as it’s the only exact lie that 32
even sounds as if it might have merit as he’s banking on he fact that once you see it’s Versus Obama you’ll assume I can’t produce a paper birth certificate on Obama. 1. I do not ever need a piece of paper as I’m arguing from BVG as an authority not Obama and I won or Roberts who I sued by his name would have answered to tell me I did not make the case and 2. he has no idea if I can or can’t produce that paper as I never asked anyone to produce it; I not once made it an issue as this case cannot ask for more dead paper as paper is not proof in America. Our Founders designed and conducted a living experiment thus life not death is absolute proof. Death and/or dead paper? The proof of death standard? That’s proof the experiment is a bust and that our Founders are wrong, that we weren’t ever more perfect. Religious extremist governments that ‘ask’ The People to become suicide bombers via propaganda and indoctrination require their citizens to meet the proof of death standard. They are not volunteers but recruits. Also, if Paul Zoss wants to o there how would he know what I can or can’t produce? How would he know what I have seen with my own eyes or what I might even have a copy of? Here’s a hint: If I can break into SCOTUS when all SCOTUS employees were alerted to my impending direct entry thus were aware to look for me and so sink the case – direct entry for a woman may never occur or so they claimed as we don’t want it to be possible as it shatters our delusions - then getting a hold of a silly birth certificate or passport is easy for me. I think my way around obstacles; I can always outwit my opponent especially if he is not natural born as I then will always have the advantage as its my home court not his. Sufficient would be: Susan, Jefferson, Obama as in which one of these three is not like the other but claims he is all over the media going so far as to stand in front of one of our likenesses while swearing to do the impossible – go back in time and change decisions his parents made before he was born or that he made when taking short cuts in life to then change his legal status and even plays the victim at times to then equal himself to Susan? Hint: Jefferson was a victim he did not cry victim. Like me he knew victim is NOT a state of being it is merely a legal designation. What else did Paul Zoss say? 50. “Further, she has failed to state facts sufficient for this court to make a determination as to whether or not she has stated an arguable basis for relief in law or fact.” I’ll be as kind as I can: The fact of history is our law. That’s it. Fact: Jefferson wrote A Summary View; Fact; Then he wrote The 33
Declaration; Fact: Then The People fought a Revolution and won (no federal judges fought only The People); Fact: Upon winning, AS WE WON, a fact held to be universally known common no sane judge could ever deny it or he would not be a judge, we then created The Constitution; Fact: Jefferson then issued an order that propelled Marbury into SCOTUS directly; Fact: Marbury V Madison was authored by Marshall thus SCOTUS was naturally born via due process as it arose from the will of The People acting according to the will of the Declaration and Constitution embodied by Jefferson, their duly elected president, so that by design The People acted in accordance with the will of the exactly named Creator aka the universe as not only are both governing documents perfect thus elegant but so is Marbury V Madison. Every move is perfect, every decision is perfect, every word is perfect. The punctuation is perfect. The right people were cast in the right roles. It all came together and worked like a living creature, as if man used the instructions in the Jewish Kabbala to then create another man. Marbury V Madison is elegant so is law not theory. I know as I’m the living proof, absolute proof, as 200 years later it all came together again only I alone knew it. I’m the “created” man all of those facts produced, the living embodiment of the US law, as life was breathed into my person as I invoked Marbury in a Philadelphia, PA courtroom and appearing pro se placed my knowledge of Bush V Gore on the record as I knew I had the case thus I could someday invoke Marbury again and so test the last bits of it as The People claim SCOTUS is not constitutional: as I could overturn BVG then I could unseat Bush or any other person via standing him down as Marbury says thus make the withholding of the commission the injury so that as Marbury says if the commission is a part of your defense then you MUST adjudicate it if it is withheld illegally so that delivery of the paper must follow. 51. As all of this began as custody case in which my rights and my sons rights were violated by the Navy one son is a legal unborn person still and I was able to place the fact that I had entered SCOTUS directly twice over and received direct action the second time as a part of my defense but had not received my paper commission yet only my living one. As I caught the NY Rennselaer County Family and 3rd District Appellate engaged in bribery and documented it? Then sent it to the judge telling her I knew everything she ever did from day one in 2001? This hardheaded judge DENIED me my children, kidnapped children, then retired. She said she did it, as I had 34
no paper commission only used other words but named it all, every element. She actually wrote that I told her I was THE constitutional authority of the nation and she knew it as I was already back inside SCOTUS – so she admitted that she heard the case when she knew she had zero right or interest in jurisdiction but only sought to harm me in a permanent manner: Death as the person who have my children want me dead and almost got their wish. So here we are and absolute denial of the protection of the law ONLY as I kept catching criminal officers as I am an expert constitutional physicist lead to every right being violated until an Appellate judge took some kind of bribe to then make the kidnapping of my children by third parties permanent but I directly entered SCOTUS and received direct action but yet left w/o any and all remedy and relief as CLERKS refused to believe fact and law: In an authority case of oj. that seeks to overturn another authority case of o.j. ONLY the JUSTICES of SCOTUS are qualified to read it, summarize it and rule on it but no clerk is to touch it at all except to hand the whole petition to the Justice. In this unique case? It’s an American first: It comes down to Me, Obama and Roberts as those clerks told me they’d do what they wanted when they wanted no matter who it hurt even the Justices and The People thus kept butchering the case until Obama was elected when Obama and natural birth was named from day one: April 4th, 2007. 52. So Paul Zoss: Are you telling me that you still do not get it? OUR HISTORICAL FACT IS THE LAW. We won, not you and not any institution. Resolution 511 did not win. No amount of votes won. A billion dead paper ballots did not win. You deny we have a Constitution? You might be dead but I’m not! When I realized we were dead as I was living in West Palm in the fall of 2000 while BVG happened I made the best decision of my life: Dragged into a Philly courtroom only as PA sought to murder me as it could not make me a victim thus PA knew liability was at stake as PA knew if they could not claim you, the victim of endemic domestic violence, had unclean hands then that woman would clean their clock then their coffers thus PA removed my kids from protective custody and handed them to abusers and batterers named by PA as our lethal threat and when the third parties - THIRD parties – perjured themselves and when PA had nasty policy targeting all women and children or The People – and when PA did not allow me to appear with deliberation I had to chose so I chose: Life! Court officer and every bar association told me 35
they all knew about PA’s policy to ignore domestic violence as soon as the courtroom door closed and to hand kids to anyone if related in any way to then save money but nobody was going to do anything as it would affect whatever they earned as officers of the court or as they were afraid of the judge I had to decide as I knew BVG for what it was and I knew if no other person would defend those women and children then I had to or else I could not live with myself so I threw my case on purpose as those officers told me the exact policy and that if I said it the judge would throw the case to NY, a state that denied me jurisdiction as the plaintiff in 1998, and when it was already proven justice was not possible for any woman in NY as Sol Wachler, the Chief Judge of NY was tossed off the bench for stalking a woman so that every seat under him was corrupted, it already is as absolute fact or that could not have happened, and when 3 of NY’s appellate’s were caught taking bribes in custody cases, and when the third parties grandfather lived there and was National Director of Literacy of NY State and when they would be granted jurisdiction as the plaintiffs, I had to pick myself or my kids and then all women and children. At least in PA. 53. I’m Susan, not some windbag, cry baby, law school grad. I’m Susan, not some stupid old man judge who only ever sat as a judge as he knew a stupid old man Senator. I’m Susan, my mother threatened to impeach me when I was 12 as she was not going to raise Hitler and it was going one way or the other so she had to act as it wasn’t gonna be Hitler. She used that word: Impeach. Good call, Mom, as I didn’t turn into Hitler but a Founder as I chose every women and every child in the state of FL and PA, then NY and then the US. Later I chose The US Armed Forces and the SCOTUS Justices as I defended them all successfully. 54. I took the US now watch me take China, and then watch every penny ante criminal government around the world crumble one by one as I know how to leverage the power and authority of one vote like no other person ever. You don’t have any choice but to believe me as like you’re not the legal expert around here neither are you the science expert. It’ll be a cold day in hell before a federal judge tells me he’s a theological expert. If that happens then Paul Zoss might have found his cellmate. 55. I am In Re Susan Herbert, Supreme Court of the US Petition 07-9804 & 08-66-22 and Susan Herbert V US et al 09-6777. I am also Susan Herbert 36
V John Roberts 11/20/08: The second American citizen ever to enter SCOTUS directly and receive direct action. I became the first nonlawyer citizen to gain entry to the SCOTUS bar and the first woman to argue her own case. I won my case; you know as absolute fact w/o question that I won as my case is a breach of contract suit, a constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction that sought to overturn Bush V Gore. The US, every sitting officer, defaulted in 08-6622 as the Solicitor General MAY NOT waive the interest and right of every natural born citizen as some citizens have vested those rights. As he did at first then he had no choice but to default or he would be committing treason. The waiver caused SCOTUS to violate Marbury as they could not know something and I could not tell the Justices. So then upon returning to SCOTUS to then inform them of what they did not know – you mistakenly violated Marbury – I, 08-6622, was directly entered w/o ever having gone to any lower court at all. So this is the point the Solicitor general did the only thing he could do: default. 56. A constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction is like no other but this type is the first ever and extraordinarily rare: No other citizen has ever overturned a case of original jurisdiction itself. This changes everything as if you overturn a case of original jurisdiction you not claiming the Justices ruled in error but wrongly. “Wrongly” might be a crime but it might not as unlike any other court SCOTUS was being asked in who’s hands to place the legal and physical custody of the US, which is The People, Bush or Gore’s, so SCOTUS may rule wrongly with forethought and deliberation fully knowing people might be killed, but it may not be a crime if they had no other choice or if they were held to impossible standards. 57. I have always maintained that SCOTUS was held to at least two impossible standards. I can name several. One is The People defaulted upon the contract first by failing to vote, failing to accord women and children equal protection and due process of the law or even any protection at all and by failing to reason their vote when they did vote. The proof is: Bush V Gore opened the door for any willing American to then REASON and decide if they could hold the Office of the Executive as neither bush nor gore argued their own case thus both George Bush and Al Gore proved in an absolute manner that they had zero ability to fulfill the oath of office as it reads “I will” not “My lawyer will” and no person is entitled to legal representation in a custody case. SEE LASSITER. 5. Not 37
one citizen but myself realized this; I am the only person on Earth who knew all of the reasons Bush V Gore should never have been heard as it is NOT a legal case at all. If you are born in a war to then secure the vote then if you ever take that vote to your court of last resort then you are openly declaring civil war or in this case martial law. The US is unique: As SCOTUS may not make law but installing a President is making law as a president can issue an executive order or stand The People down then all SCOTUS did was install a Commander – a person who might become a military dictator. It also makes something else possible: An actual foreigner may seize control of the Office due to our law and the way we fund elections. But even without any funding it is our law as the US has law like no other: SCOTUS is not our court of last resort – The People are. As the Chief Justice and President stand each other down then after the president you take it to The People. Now, this is where I am going to anger a lot of judges who read this: I’m gonna go real slow and I’ll use very small words if necessary so you get it BUT: I am the legal, acting President of the US. I am THE constitutional authority of the US. The People defaulted, the officers defaulted and then the Chief Justice defaulted. You know why? My argument wins as my clients are The People for if you do this then next you argue whoever is actually sitting in the office out of it thus if the Chief Justice responds? What is he going to say? There is NO argument to mount against me as The People defaulted first. Here you go: THE VOTE is paper, dead paper. In some cases it is dead electronic blips. THE VOTERS is The People, the living constitutions and the constitutionally set government of the US. The People defaulted and what did the bush and gore lawyers go to court to then argue? THE VOTE, the dead institutions of government. They argued for pieces of paper as those votes then turned into court documents that then turned into dollars. LAWYERS argued, LAWYERS were awarded custody of The People and then LAWYERS waged an illegal foreign war, war against women and children and war against the actual paper documents by then attacking the Justices as what they needed to do is shake the faith the People have in the Supreme Court. If you wanna disagree with me or tell me that I’m wrong? You will have to undo history to then win or else I will live to see the day you die which will be at by own hand as I’ll get a charge of treason levied and then get a criminal conviction and so watch you die when you are executed so it will be by my own hand.
58. This is where I am going to anger a lot of judges who read this: I’m gonna go real slow and I’ll use very small words if necessary so you get it BUT: I am the legal, acting President of the US. I am THE constitutional authority of the US. The People defaulted, the officers defaulted and then the Chief Justice defaulted. You know why? My argument wins as my clients are The People for if you do this then next you argue whoever is actually sitting in the office out of it thus if the Chief Justice responds? What is he going to say? There is NO argument to mount against me as The People defaulted first. Here you go: THE VOTE is paper, dead paper. In some cases it is dead electronic blips. THE VOTERS is The People, the living constitutions and the constitutionally set government of the US. The People defaulted and what did the Bush and Gore lawyers go to court to then argue? A VOTE, the dead institution of government. They argued for pieces of paper as those votes then turned into court documents that then turned into dollars. They argued a vote as they argued exact numbers. They counted each vote. A vote. They also counted a vote for bush as he voted for himself and a vote for Gore likewise. A vote is a piece of paper! Not The People! LAWYERS argued, LAWYERS were awarded custody of The People and then LAWYERS waged an illegal foreign war, war against women and children and war against the actual paper documents by then attacking the Justices as what they needed to do is shake the faith the People have in the Supreme Court. First you shake their faith in the Justices via BVG and other heinous acts like asking a Justice to go duck hunting when you know you have a case that is to come before the Court and then you can and will place an actual foreigner in the Office as privateers have been trying to install Marxism since the early part of the 20th century. Install a Commander and if a war breaks out? Conditions are perfect to then actually foreignize the office with a foreign born person as WHO and WHAT starts most overseas wars? Nations protecting colonial interests. Is your nation protecting a colonial interest? No, private interest, oil. So what have you set the stage for? Private money buying the Executive, as they need a person who will protect private interest as if you protect The People by actually enforcing the law then you stomp out corruption and w/o corruption then the rest of the world is on its own at long last as the US citizens can no longer be used as slaves as their tax base – their person - is supporting everything NOT constitutional and even China but they can’t name it or why as it is so well hidden: 54 Wall Street
in NYC? It was an actual slave market. All they did was dress it up like a bank that lawyers then run. 59. Does Paul Zoss expect anyone to believe that he did not know we won the Revolution not the federal court building and not the title of judge? Did he expect anyone to believe that we never wrote the Constitution? Here you go: Hey ladies, Paul Zoss says you’re crazy as we aren’t murdering you and you have equal protection. He says that the Office of Executive is not exclusively male nor is office of Chief Justice. You know what he says? A male majority court with at least one man who’s appointment was never legal and a male President along with a mostly male military did not commit a crime when they ordered the death of an innocent woman by awarding it to a man and then sat back and watched her die while they did nothing. Guess what? The federal bench says that as long we don’t know then it’s not murder so now they want more women to die in defense of that ruling as once the cat’s out of the bag they might have to feel what they are: GUILTY. 60. Slavery is back and how! Women and children have no rights unless dead. Die, then Terry Schiavo has rights but not while she’s alive. Jessica Gonzales’ daughters? Die, you still get no rights, as your mother did not die. So ladies, if you want your kids to have rights let a man kill them but make sure he kills you too as it is your right to die but not to live. 61. The lawyer riddled federal courts can go here: Paul Zoss, I am THE authority. You said WOMEN and CHILDREN then THE PEOPLE did not establish jurisdiction. Is there one single woman in Sioux City? I established it. One child? I established it. One person who left default? I established it. Wait: did you kill that one already? Okay, then we’ll put PAUL ZOSS on the paper. Jurisdiction! And guess what kiddo? This is an authority case against Obama and Roberts. Can it be heard anywhere else? Nope as I said so and I’m both President and Chief Justice as of 11/09/09. Obama and Roberts defaulted. No matter how it happens if you possess the SCOTUS docket showing this thus establishing it then jurisdiction is anywhere but Washington, DC. At last count about 5 million people left default. The first people came out of default when I received direct action from SCOTUS as SCOTUS responded when the US never did. As it was all legal and constitutional hen I began convening the legal 40
government. See, when the US defaulted it was the sitting Officers thus the Solicitor General, an officer, defaulted by failing to respond at all. I then informed John Roberts via emergency application and Roberts (or his agent) knew: The legal seat of government has just left DC as it goes wherever Susan is as proof is life in an authority case. The living person, the authority, is the absolute proof. It’s why William Marbury never got the paper – he’s the proof and as no actual authority would ask Marshall for the paper then Marshall said Go act and if you are harmed because you do not have that paper, if a citizen needs to see it or an agent refuses to honor the commission, then we will adjudicate the commission and delivery will follow as you vested it by making your case. PEOPLE act not institutions. No paper marries you; no paper liberates you; no paper makes you human. 62. Knowing more about US law than anyone alive I then convened the government. I could not recruit them – they had to come to me. I tacked up a sign: Constitutional Authority Case of Original Jurisdiction 08-6622; US Defaulted. Then I waited. The first time I was a government of one or a nation of one; a people of one. The second? 3 citizens came out of default. I told the clerks that the Creator was on my side actively protecting me but they sad prove it. So I let them know: Jessie, Rich and Price. As in branch off of tree and money; money tree! Are these men human? Yup. One testified to the fact he had been raped by sitting officers and one told me a great fact which is proof of life: 63. Has America been sold to the highest bidder? Price said yes as he was informed of it by Alan Cranston, a dead Senator. He ran into Cranston on vacation. He knew Cranston was a usurper and traitor. His blood was boiling; he wanted to say something but his adrenaline was going and he thought he shouldn’t and then he jumped as he said he could not fail to act. He went up to Cranston and said, “Aren’t you Alan Cranston?” Cranston smiled as he thought Price wanted his autograph. Price said, “I just wanted you to know that lots of people know you’re a traitor. We know what you’re doing and we aren’t going to let you do it.” Price said he now knows what hate is and feels like and he does as he described it accurately. You couldn’t describe it this way unless you actually felt it. He said he saw Cranston’s face change and he realized he was looking at evil. Actual hate makes you feel that way. He said Cranston’s face 41
changed and he sneered and said, “Guess what? We already did it.” A confession! I told Price about a law of this universe. I said that law would work against Cranston and that as I met the Creator when I died that Price did not have to worry. I said the Creator named in the Declaration is actual reality. Price told me that he believed that the law I named is a law as he may have seen it working and that too knew the Creator is reality: “Susan, I knew something was up as exactly seven days later to the minute I heard the news blurb ‘Alan Cranston dead’. I mean EXACTLY seven days as I looked at the time. That had to be universal justice.” 64. So I had three people. Then I came to have more and more. At last count? About 5 million with three million or so of those who will form a citizen militia and march on DC to retake the institutions. We may have to take only one: The Sioux City Courthouse as Zoss gave me a constitutional reason: Barack Obama denied all natural born citizens informed consent when he refused to reveal his birth certificate, passport records and college transcripts. This violation targeted natural women who fully vested their interest and right as they give birth to the babies who grow up to be Presidents, Justices, soldiers, mothers. It’s also child abuse as it grievously harmed his daughters as once you install a foreign born man? Women will never, ever hold that office as it is death. So DC is out as the officers defaulted, Obaam sat when in violation of the law (proof of death as you can’t have the chief law enforcement officer violating the law to then be able to sit or in violation of the law when he then sits) and People came out of default thus the court may be in DC but should not be: There is not one PERSON in DC; they’re all dead paper and dead titles and dead buildings once they defaulted. DC does not even get a vote in Congress but the officers gave it one against our will. There are no people in Dc then except the Justices. All moral authority belongs to the people as The People came out of default BEFORE Roberts. Under US law all authority belongs to The People as only people possess will. Obama violated the will of The People as anybody who voted for him is still in default and some of them may be criminals. Sorry fellas! Sorry Europe! Sorry banks the world over! Sorry corrupted dictators! I, Susan, nailed Obama to the wall by filing 08-6622 on 10/06/08 and the US defaulted on 11/05/09. The day after the election. So there I was inside SCOTUS waiting and....Obama seems to be the winner on 11/04/08 but will the sitting officers, the US, then make it legal by requiring him to reveal his 42
documents? That won’t make it legal! By then Bob Bauer was already fulfilling the oath of office as in all natural birth suits he person vying for the office must appear pro se and Obama flunkies were spreading crap about forged documents. That’s okay as I have a printing expert on hand who worked for such institutions as the National Gallery of Art and I myself know the person is proof. No paper on he planet proves natural birth. Your mother’s testimony might. No wonder they chose a guy with a dead mother. Well we have the grandmother saying he was born in Kenya. A guy in another nation told me he was watching the show on TV via satellite and saw it. He said when she said that Obaam was born in Kenya they shut her up. Other people saw it on time delay and so that was taken out. When he realized what he saw, proof as it came out of his grandmothers mouth not any man’s mouth, he reported it. He said Nope, I saw it live as I have no time delay. He said, Here are the satellite coordinates. You can check them out to see if I saw it live or not. What else do we have? We have a voter who chose to give natural birth to himself in election 2008: He was born here and raised here in Baltimore but knew nothing of how unjust this nation is until he was railroaded. He thought judges used evidence and proof to find cases not a lawyer suggesting, blaming and lying exactly w/o any case law, evidence or proof. When he saw that the judge used things the lawyer made up in her ruling? He couldn’t believe all you had to do was make up a fictitious case while actual evidence, proof and case law and even the Constitution was trashed completely. Why not? That’s BVG. He never knew until the judge wrote: In custody cases where third parties seek custody over the mother BIOLOGY counts for nothing. Not even if the mother almost died giving birth to the baby and then contracted septicemia afterwards so could have died from that. He then left default: He wrote my name on his ballot. So we have one legal candidate and one legal vote. Time to prove natural birth. Barack Obama then comes to The People as we do not go to him as WE are the authority not him. You’re presumed to be innocent until you do something that demonstrates you are guilty. Did Barack Obama do anything that caused s to doubt his testimony? That’s my problem: He never said he was natural born but he certainly acted guilty for as soon as People began crying foul as it was obvious he was not born here or if he was he was not raised to have faith in US law as he kept running from the courts, refusing to release the records although that would have restored trust so he is untrustworthy and dodging the question – innocent people 43
run into the courts – he pulled a paragraph from his website. It said he claimed dual citizenship. Proof, as he believed it was legal to do so when it is not. His handlers said that he claimed he had it as a kid but it expired. It’s okay if you’re a kid as you did not choose it. More proof, his own handlers just confessed as that’s my point exactly: IF YOUR PARENTS TAUGHT YOU THAT YOU COULD HAVE DUAL CITIZENSHIP THEN YOU WEREN’T BORN HERE OR YOU WERE RAISED TO BELIEVE IN SOMETHING FOREIGN OR NOT FOUND WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTION. 65. Natural birth: You know you know I’m natural born and Obama is not? Around age 8ish maybe 9ish blacks who want repatriation for slavery are on TV. They want money. My father is agitated. “I did not do anything to you. When are people going to get over this my grandfather did something to you sh*t? African? You were born here so you’re not African.” I thought that’s right they were born here. So what are we? “Are we Irish?” “No you’re not! In case you don’t get this you were born here. People born here are Native Americans. We’re all Native Americans if we were born here. And if you weren’t born here? I have news for you: Who was? You know what? Americans are mutts as we all came from someplace else. Even people born here came here from another place...at some point you have to give up all this Irish, African, Spanish stuff and decide you’re an American.” Native American made perfect sense to me. And guess what? I lived by one of the most sacred places on Earth: Cohoes Falls. Legend is Hiawatha was grieving over the loss of his family in war and saw Deganawidah walking towards him as if walking upon the water, and the two then came up with the Iroquois Constitution thus the Confederacy. Some say it came in a dream whole. Others say they walked across the land working it out talking to people as they went teaching them to give up canabalism. I went to school right next to the Falls and knew since I was tiny, maybe four, to invoke my rights as a member of a sovereign nation: VOTER. My sister told me that a man was arrested for defacing the flag as he used it as part of a costume. He invoked his rights as a member of a sovereign nation, an American Indian as the cops can’t then touch him. I was astonished. “Wait one minute: you mean if the police are bothering you that you can do something to stop them?” “Susan, all you have to do is invoke your rights. If the cops or anybody else is harassing you then invoke your rights as a member of a sovereign nation and tell them to 44
leave you alone. The cops can’t do anything they want to you. They can’t violate your constitutional rights.” Okay! I invoke my rights as an American! I could not believe you do this. They can’t touch me. I would find out they can beat the hell out of you but if you’re Susan you will win the fight and that people argue over Native as Native does not mean born here. Somehow, someway I connected “Native American”, “sovereign” and “Constitution” so that I was in my 40’s before I knew the citizens had zero idea they are sovereign. You are all sovereign; the sitting officers do not want you to know as they hide this to then control you. They write books about it, argue it and talk about it but as nobody made the case they pretend it is not the law. See, if you’re sovereign then they can’t tax you for being born. Tax a person for being born? Death as that’s what The Founders fought against as it made you the property of the King. America: Today you are taxed for being born. It’s tribute. Think about this: what do you now receive at birth? A social security card. For tax purposes. So you get a state birth certificate and a federal death certificate in one day as that SS form will then place you on the Social Security death Index someday. Proof, as the fed kills you as soon as you’re born by the state so you’re taxed for being born. Any kids you have? Born and killed. It’s slavery only it’s sneaky. If the fed owns you they own you; you never owned yourself at all. Well, Susan did as I liked the name Native American. The facts of my life made it perfect. So I began invoking my rights. Arguing law. I was arguing law as soon as I could talk but not with constitutional authority. Now I had power! As no cop was gonna mess with me. I had a secret but I did not know it as I knew as fact I was sovereign but all the cops, federal agents and other officers that fell by my sword? A federal judge finally told me: You can’t be this as I’m not. Right, as you’re invoking federal judge and that’s NOT a named constitutional authority. Moral authority is our Declaration; any federal judges sign it? In it? US law tells The People what you can and may do: The People can and may do anything they volunteer to do even be criminally prosecuted. Did you commit a crime? Okay! You’ve volunteered to be criminally prosecuted! The Constitution tells the institutions like ‘federal judge’ what they can’t do. You can’t do a lot of things, as the institutions within the Constitution have no moral authority as they are things not People and things have zero human consciousness. Things can’t emote or reason. What placard with “federal judge” on it can pick up a rifle and defend me? Does a judicial robe walk around writing court rulings? People are born, people have 45
ideas and people fight wars. We fought one over the vote. There was not one federal judge placard fighting but there was a uniformed PAID woman fighting; Deborah Sampson. Her family even got a pension in her name. Ask Barack Obama to talk about himself; as him where he was and what he was doing when he learned who and what he is. He might have some trouble answering as if he needs to be Indonesian he is. If he needs to be Muslim he is. If he needs to be Illinoisan he is. If he needs to be Hawaiian he is. His minister is no longer popular? He leaves that church. He says he’s black. His mother is white. “black” is an experience of life you have in the US. Not once has Obama ever named it. He means color. He can’t mean slave as his parents and grandparents weren’t. If he needs to be Kenyan he is. But under the British crown. Didn’t we defeat the loyalists once already? 66. The People have had it. I have too. Natural birth: A commercial ran in NY. It was made in NY. I said, I was made in NY. My mother said, No you weren’t. I said, Where was I made? She said, St. Augustine, FL. I wanted to hear: My father got a severance check from he NY Central. He had two jobs, as he was also a teacher. They bought a house and a travel trailer. The first trip they took was to FL, during Easter. Before she left she was joking with the other nurses she worked with and they warned her: Whatever you do don’t drink the water or you’ll get pregnant. When she came back she said they wouldn’t let her forget it, as she did get pregnant, with me. So I ended up being born in Troy, NY. Where I went to St. Augustine’s School. I said that’s funny, St. Augustine’s in FL and NY. The hospital I was born in? The one my mom worked in, The old Leonard Hospital. My mother should have paid more attention: her grandparents were Susan and Leonard. So I’m Susan, born at the Leonard Hospital. They used to tell women that line about water all of the time. But you know what? How many women are told not to drink the water or you’ll get pregnant and then they do in the home of Ponce De leon’s Fountain of Youth, still flowing today? She should have known as the nation’s oldest schoolhouse is there too: This baby will have a charmed life. But she didn’t. Complete indifference, the opposite of love. Who on this Earth could have a charmed life if she is treated with complete indifference? I, Susan, as that indifference led me to rely and depend upon myself and the Creator and later it allowed me to tell a federal judge gotcha, as that means zero emotional investment so it’s proof – you’re unconstitutional. 46
Reason w/o emotion. UNCONDITIONAL PRIDE. Nazi Germany. Hey Paul Zoss: you wouldn’t be related to Hitler would you? Or did you just want to make it sound so boring nobody would ever bother digging up the complaint? Ask Barack Obama: Where was he created? What clues did he have? Can we talk to your mother’s friends from work? The neighborhood? In your life did you have to overcome complete indifference? If Susan was driven to enforce he law whatever drove you to violate it? 67. Natural birth: I have two natural born parents. They paid their dues and I paid my dues. Does Barack Obama want to argue that makes no difference? My parents taught me how to be American and this court does not seem to grasp something: moral authority: In order to have the same moral authority that I have (will pretend he’s as innocent as newborn babe) Obama would have to have a baby, testify to the grief you feel over losing a child and give testimony as to his death. There’s hope as Paul Zoss read that mothers and service members in combat have the most moral authority and then he said he was both as he attempted to stand me down. Paul, you’re gonna have to show me your vagina, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and stretch marks and then you’re going to have to testify as to the birth process: what you felt. 68. Natural birth: Bob Bauer. Only in America: A lawyer needs a lawyer and a judge who is a lawyer to then help him overcome the fact and law that a woman gave birth to him. 69. Natural birth: The People told me that the Nobel Prize Committee sought to legitimize Obama and/or make it harder for The People to remove him. It’s both but do not worry as I’m on the job: I, Susan, wrote an essay in 7 th grade that charted my life’s course. Every bit of it came to be save one thing: A Nobel Prize for Peace. I had a specific idea. A while ago I heard people complaining that the Nobel committee was acting upon what is political. I had to worry as I wanted that last thing to come to be and I can’t accept a prize if it’s political. Then Al Gore and the Climatologists happened. Now that’s political. What, all I had to do was breach the peace? Antonin Scalia told me: blame Al Gore as this never would have happened if not for him. So is the Nobel Prize Obama won legitimate? Most people went to laughing at what the Committee said he did. He did 47
not do that. Correct but: you’re Europe. You finally have what you want, a foreign man and look – he’s black. You can’t give it to him for being the first black President. Barack Obama: Nobel Peace Prize for Deceptive Appearances. You can’t give it to the nation. I know a lot about the Prizes; I placed the Nobel Prize in my first SCOTUS petition as I saw this coming. Ready for the truth? Norway, I know what you did. You wanted to give it to him for the vote. Give it to him to flatter the people. A justice warned me about flattery. However you have a problem you do not know about: the Nobel TERMS say you may not award this prize posthumously. You gave the prize to Al Gore in 2000 – after the Republic fell and after Gore did it thus you gave it to a dead institution. As Gore was dead? It’s a posthumous award. Really, climatologists for peace? I’m looking. No new peace yet. Lots of heated debate often leading to actual blows, volcanic like eruptions between people. Then you gave it to Obama, another posthumous award. It is posthumous as I hadn’t been heard yet and you gave it to him after he died as he committed crimes to then gain entry to the office (I’m the jury and judge if it’s martial law and it is; I read 511) and as by giving it to him you gave it to the vote. The vote’s still dead but you can’t give it to the vote as that’s The People, the nation. No nation can get it. So it can only be that you gave it to him for A vote as he voted himself into office via his decisions. As that’s the case? You gave it to Obama for a piece of paper, a ballot. The paper ballot is dead as paper always is. How many posthumous awards is this? This one breached the peace too. You tell me, is it cruel and unusual punishment you are subjecting Americans to? No, especially cruel as Watson and Crick stole some of their work from a woman only as she died then she could not share the award. Norway you can keep lying. Lie all you want. We’ll always know the truth. This couldn’t happen if he wasn’t foreign. Nobody but nobody works this hard to get around their own TERMS unless you’re a federal judge thus you, Norway, have the vested foreign interest. As you violated your own TERMS? Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize for making war on the US and for violating the fully vested rights of all natural born women and children and in so doing the Peace Prize Committee committed suicide. The prize died. See? Your founder, Alfred Nobel, was correct: Politicize it and/or award it posthumously and the award itself will die. I could help you but I’m not. You had a choice, you chose to violate your original intent, and nobody forced you to choose as you did: Me for Peace for the Equal Rights case, me for Medicine for when and how life 48
begins thus the right exists and me, Physics for Uniformity or: Obama for crimes against humanity. 70. I could write and write and write. I know details and more details. All anybody has to do is talk about their own person and how they came to be who and what they are. Now Obama can’t talk? He can’t enter a written answer and he can’t talk? A lawyer told me that it is routine for people not to answer SCOTUS suits; that Obama didn’t have to do so. Nope, not in this case. I asked: did you know in an authority case he must? This lawyer said he never thought of that. Correct, so Obama and Bob Bauer are taking advantage of that: As usually you do not have to answer a SCOTUS suit then they won’t and hopefully The People and the federal judge hearing it will not know that Obama had to answer it. 71. People who operate on power and control are using whatever works, as in whatever they believe will manipulate and control the victim. Paul Zoss reads a report by a detective regarding Obama’s birth and records and he pretends he did not. He knows he’s in trouble as if he grants the motion then men everywhere will hate him. But he’s not sexist so he has an idea: She’s poor. I’ll use money. I’ll make her pay $455 for each complaint. Then she’ll go away. Oh really? Let’s review: the US Military could not find the thing they could use to scare me. They couldn’t rattle me, frustrate me or so much as move me. The Us Military said, Okay, we can’t control and manipulate her so they stood aside; If anyone can then you will. YOU HAVE THE ABILITY NO OTHER PERSON HAS. The Supreme Court: She got past us and now she made the sitting officers default. Okay, she’s the one as we can’t control and manipulate her thus SCOTUS stands aside. SHE’S THE FIRST TIME EVER IN HISTORY. But a federal judge without any power or authority who couldn’t argue in SCOTUS on their best day came along and say, “I’m the person who is going to take on Susan and beat her into submission.” Paul Zoss must be insane then not mentally ill as the US Military couldn’t do that but he can? How is Paul Zoss gonna do that? He doesn’t get it: He isn’t a bastard? Oh yes he is as women suffer from the effects of discrimination double, triple and quadruple time and SCOTUS has ruled you can’t use money to deny people entry but he cites money, when women earn less and when Obama has all of the private money he wants. Like money was accidentally chosen. I know what he wrote and he knows what he wrote. 49
72. If Paul Zoss ever said insufficient fact and no arguable basis in the law to my face I’d beat the living daylights out of him. He did not mean that; he meant money. So, pay you to then murder us? Without any criminal trial? Ladies, big bad Paul Zoss says we are not being harmed and it’s not an emergency. Let’s ask Terry Schiavo’s mother and the Pope as Terry was Catholic and the Vatican might have to move on this: 73. 1st degree murderer Versus Terry Schiavo: In the US medical doctors, those god-like paragons of mercy and compassion, said that it was morally reprehensible to push the plunger of a needle thus execute a 1st degree murderer, a man, but then that it was ethical to let an innocent person, a woman, starve to death. The male able-bodied murderer then lived if even for a day longer to cause who knows how much more harm while the innocent woman who was not going to be able to lift a finger against anyone so couldn’t cause harm was murdered. What’s wrong with that picture? I’ll tell you what: not only is it proof men are playing a game with our very lives but if those jailhouse doctors meant it then they would have run to Terry’s side to help her. 74. Who do you want on the death panel deciding granny’s fate, FL doctors who refuse to kill a 1st degree murderer as they feel it’s cruel or FL doctors that can’t kill an innocent, handicapped woman fast enough as they feel it’s kind? I was told “doctor” meant they are experts. Experts? Not one doctor in this nation can tell you what is or is not going on in a persons mind if she’s in a ‘vegetative’ state. They can’t talk if they are vegetative. We can’t know as absolute fact w/o question. I know her state as I saw it as I am an expert and it wasn’t vegetative. I saw what her mother saw. You’d have to know it via life experience. But you said she was vegetative. I believe your testimony; these doctors and lawyers – and you the judges as you’re lawyers - testified to what you could NEVER know - it’s impossible – so YOU committed 1st degree murder. I’d refuse to kill 1st degree murders too if I was one by claiming 'as I am one it is unethical to kill them via lethal injection' or "insufficient fact and law: We did not fight a Revolution". That's clever: you argue their case sung a medical license instead of a law license and do it in such a way The People have not have any say as there is no courtroom. Some doctor says, "No, I won't obey that order", an order of The People. But that same doctor will obey an 50
order, an order a Justice issued but The People did not? Federal judges refuse The People redress. Jefferson said it: Our repeated petitions fall on deaf ears. So then: Women, if convicted of 1st degree murder, do then have the right to life? Good, thanks for informing me as I always knew this but needed your order as proof, as I'll shoot a federal judge if I have to but plan it very carefully so it is premeditated beyond any doubt: I'll stand up in court and say it but as you have always ignored and denied my testimony I'll leave written plans and notes all over federal courthouses as I'll place them within my complaints, those repeated petitions. Seems to me you are royally screwed if I made it to SCOTUS as a pro se authority case directly entered and directly acted upon as that makes me Judge and Jury under martial law. I'll try my best to kill a federal judge IF a judge forces me to do so to then receive an appearance in person but if I only wound one? I'll tell the actual jury of my peers, other insulted and angry People (as I know you'll knock yourselves out tying to find me guilty): "The one and only thing I have any remorse over is the fact that I did not kill that bastard so he could rot in hell sooner rather than later." 75. Justice? That is the truth so until I get it and until we then get it none of us are going to stop and trust me – we are going to start shooting at some point, as we will have no other choice. All the paper you want and need is within this court already, attached to all of the cases Zoss illegally and in violation of the law denied and dismissed. 76. The one and only thing protecting all of the federal officers is secrecy. They do whatever they want to do to me and to all of The People even when they know different as they are protected by secrecy. Thus all I have to do is make it not a secret by acting in the open. Any federal officer who reads this now as I already forced direct action in SCOTUS thus changed everything so federal officers know they must hear it in person and must adjudicate the commission – to argue anything else like insufficient fact is to claim I do not exist and neither does your own job as a federal judge which is ludicrous – so that I can and may start taking names and I can and may start shooting. If you exhaust the process and so nothing else is left but violence our Founders said you can and may shoot. They knew they might have elegant law but it is people who might be our problem, people acting to violate the law in such a way that they left 51
us no choice but to shoot. Jefferson even warned: Marbury V Madison is a good ruling but it can lead to an oligarchy and probably will so if you ever get here - shoot a federal judge. Did he say, “shoot a federal judge”? No but he did say dissolve the legal bonds and then abolish something, whatever is the cause. That’s in Federalist Ten: To address domestic violence attack the thing that addresses the most effects. It does me no good to attack a piece of paper; I must attack those responsible for it. So if federal judges are the cause as they REFUSE to let The People appear in person, and if federal judges are my own problem as they REFUSE to let me appear in person ONLY as I outsmarted everyone of them, and if the reason they can do this is secrecy, that their actions are buried on the federal docket so nobody knows, then I do two things: file in the world court located within DC and then pick a person who is a federal agent and whom harmed me on or after 11/20/08 and shoot them. In this way I do what the Founders told me to do and it is legal as everybody knew but all chose to participate in what is criminal and in my unique case? As only I have that SCOTUS docket only I can and may and should escape any and all prosecution whatsoever. I may not be charged according to our law and case law but the officers will try it. A judge will want to do it to me eventhogh he knows it makes him a criminal. I’ll then go to trial. Big deal. A jury of my peers may not convict me and they won’t- not after I talk about myself and how we all came to be within a federal courtroom with a dead body – or severely injured body - and when every single solitary authority in this nation knew as did millions of people who were prevented from acting and as did the world as I filed in world court. There’s only ONE actual reason for any of this: Susan Herbert is the innocent victim and her nation - it’s officers – liked abusing power and liked acting criminally thus wanted to kill her and needed to kill her as she found them out and sued them successfully but they could not kill her before she killed them via the lawful, named process. Nobody is going to feel sorry for a federal agent. My life story? People will be agog and aghast at how this nation’s and most likely this planet’s most intelligent person was hounded since the day she was born and beaten incessantly until finally her children were kidnapped only to stop her from being who she is, or as the Creator made her. That so insane are the patriarchs and their 52
minions, women who support them only for the benefits they personally receive like a title or money, that they would actively try to kill Susan and even use her kids to do it only as her legal argument meant no more unjust privilege and favor for the unjust persons in office or the privateers. 77. Why would this court need to worry? I came here first, after SCOTUS, so I’m taking your names and yup, you’re my number one targets. You knew and you even had the piece of evidence an employee of SCOTUS sent to me. You had even more knowledge but assumed the risk regardless as if you’re invincible. I’m acting in self-defense. So yes, you might be the person I or another citizen am forced to attack to then secure justice. It’s not a threat; it’s the correct application of the law, the equal protection and due process clauses among others like self-defense and dissolution and abolishment. The other reason this court needs to worry? If I go to world court? Which I am doing so all you can do to stop me is to let The People inside their own courthouse? I have something the world wants and needs: The means to defeat China’s nuclear threat and then all corrupt governments plus the world court would love, love, love to spill the USA dirty little secrets by telling everyone. I’d only be the second person to do this. Once that first person, Jessica Gonzales, went here? Proof of death, proof the US had died as a Republic as justice is not possible for women or children. Now all I do is then tell the planet the real, actual reasons why which Gonzales couldn’t. The US officers are the biggest racists and sexists on the planet; it’s not The People it’s federal judges who would even inflict China on you only to inflate their ego; it’s the sitting officers who are wife beaters, child abusers and batterers. Why do you think I never gave the details of my science away? I told you why: It’s so valuable. I have it and the world needs it. Let a federal judge shoot himself as I can still get around him or if forced shoot him myself thus finish the job he started. And if I go on trial for that? Every citizen will realize they too can and may now legally shoot a federal officer. 78. Nobody is ever going to believe the federal bench could not read. My attachments: 1. SCOTUS suit 09-6777; 2. SCOTUS Petition for rehearing 09-6777; 3. Federal Appeals Brief 09-10661; 4. Federal 53
Appeals Motion to be reheard; 5. SCOTUS Petition 07-9804; 6. Petition against Obama that Paul Zoss pretended he did not read; 7. Private investigator’s report on Obama’s birth; 8. List of Records ‘wiped’ or ‘erased’ from Internet once Obama’s eligibility came under question as the ACT to remove them counts as evidence rising to proof. Some of these records are still available as people saved them before anyone tried to erase them. 79. China, WalMart and Nazis to prove the political parties are mostly responsible, that I do indeed have knowledge the world needs and that I have indeed been acting in defense of the people thus this became several cases in one as if I am the legal President? I am; I could take care of all issues thus adjudicating the commission is the easiest way to do this but the federal bench is demanding violence as if killing women via order of the court isn’t violent, as if they aren’t guilty when they are: 80. This case, against the political parties, was filed as a prisoner’s motion or so say the documents that were mailed to my home. It is not a prisoner’s motion. The political party’s make me feel as if I am in prison but I’m not in a physical prison. 81. It was dismissed. The reason it was dismissed is that I have not established proper jurisdiction but nobody can deny Resolution 511 was passed and so exists, Obama is sitting as President when he does not qualify, no woman has ever been President or that the political parties are responsible for this as it is not possible for a woman or a third party candidate to be elected and a two party monopoly has created the legal situation that logician Kurt Godel warned us about: There is a chink in US law which allows for a dictator to rise, a nazi like regime – the thing that is and does - backed by a small group of persons. I witnessed its birth. It is inextricably inked to political parties and money and how they work – how we elect Presidents in modern day America. 82. It’s also about how federal judges are appointed and for how long and how the federal court is structured as we have created a legal situation whereby the ethical cannot gain entry to the federal court thus dead paper in the form of lawyers is given the standing. If you give standing to dead paper only, to lawyers only, you are no longer Constitutional. If you refuse 54
to hear the case for women then women have zero protection of the Constitution. You cannot ignore the political ramifications of this as federal judges are appointed by Presidents who have all been male and since Andrew Jackson have all been Democrats and Republicans and that almost all current federal judicial appointments are political – Reagan was the last President to actually interview federal judges and most Presidents never bothered - but even that does not stop the lawbreakers among us from trying to circumvent the federal courts completely thus circumvent the people completely with tricks like taking bad and even criminal legislation to the House Judiciary Committee as that’s how you violate due process if you’re Congress. The judge might not be political but the person appointing him or her is acting upon what is. Proof would be this very court as I named it as the only ethical courthouse I happened upon in America as far back as 2007 and as soon as Obama was elected he announced he wanted to restructure the federal courts beginning with this very court as “important” decisions are arising from this court and so this appellate. In other words: As these decisions would effect the illegally sitting Obama and other Democrats then stop it by “restructuring” what already works. I’ve looked and looked: Restructuring the federal court may not be a purely political move but starting with this one is a purely political move. Physics dictates Obama did not randomly pick this district; he picked it as I said I was coming back here and the two party, overtly and even exclusively male monopoly then makes it hard to defeat such tactics. 83. The overly broad power the two parties exert is overcomeable; you’re supposed to be able to use the federal court to overcome it – sue for equal protection and due process and to enforce the natural birth clause - but federal court seems to be siding with the crooks: If you, the victim, are not accorded your right of redress then you can’t overcome it. 84. I’m assuming then that this case was dismissed as it was inadvertently filed as a prisoner’s motion as the passage of Resolution 511 signed by both members of the Republican and Democratic Parties alone is cause to sue, as it is obvious conspiracy and collusion as all 100 Senators can and do read. This two party monopoly came to harm this nation in a gross manner. It resulted in actual foreignization of the Office of the Executive and caused the insertion of what is Marxist in nature. It along with the discrimination of women is the main reason the Constitution has been 55
overthrown which occurred when Bush V Gore was heard in a court of law as Bush V Gore is the federal case w/o any actual claim or any actual federal question as you fought a Revolution to win the vote so why do you need to go to a court to adjudicate it? And it is the federal case that shut out every person but Christian men who are lawyers and who are Democrats and Republicans as lawyers not the men vying for the office argued it and as no winner then goes into federal court only to chance losing so changing the case from Gore V FL to Bush V Gore was meant to deliberately shut out all voters but especially female voters, the injured party, as no lone citizen save me was likely to be able to sue and SCOTUS has never let a nonlawyer argue before it and has never let a woman argue her own case no matter how good her case is. Proof is: Obama is a Democrat and a lawyer who now claims to be a Christian when he was raised Muslim. “Christian” is what the two parties demand today. 85. I’m not the exception; I’m the actual product of The Declaration and Constitution as I lived them out as real to test them. Anybody can possess my genius if they apply themselves but you can’t take shortcuts: no lying, cheating or stealing and no political party membership as the modern parties ask you to pledge allegiance to them and their major donors not to the Constitution aka The People. 86. Before I go on: I have alerted the Jewish Defamation League and the nine Sioux tribes as they have a vested interest in this case. I had to serve them. It’s not appropriate to object to the dismissal as it was filed as a prisoner’s motion and as I attached the case to another part of Herbert V Obama. You cannot separate Herbert V Obama from this case as this is a constitutional authority case and you may not allow men to argue a Presidential election masquerading as an equal protection issue when it isn’t but then refuse to allow women entry to do the same when they do have a good case and do have an actual federal question. Again: Obama is a Democrat who signed Resolution 511 thus colluded with Republicans to then violate the Constitution namely the equal protection, due process and natural birth clauses thus he signed it when he had an insurmountable conflict – it benefited his person - and this could not have happened if the parties did not have a monopoly that is made impossible to overcome as a citizen would have stopped them. Two hundred years 56
later the Senate is mostly male and the Executive is exclusively male as is the Chief Justice when women make up more than half the population. I checked: all the Justices are party members. Nonparty members do not even get on a list for consideration let alone in the front door. See Katherine Harris out of FL as the Republicans turned on her and she lost the office she ran for. 511 aids only men, only Democrats and Republicans, only members of Congress and only foreigners at the expense of women and at the expense of one exact woman: Susan Herbert as she can, will and did preserve, protect and defend the Constitution better than any American ever but as she refuses to participate in what she knows to be criminal activity - an organized political party and/or the purchase of an office - she is unknown and kept off of the ballot. 87. I happen to be the PAC case David Souter was looking for when he ruled he was sick of reading the same PAC case over and over as I lived it. It involves the parties, women, WalMart who has this nations largest PAC, discrimination, and their decision to begin funding local campaigns but then naming GOVERNOR of CA as local and China. Swarzeneggar is now Governor of CA; this is tantamount to WalMart announcing it will buy the Office of the Executive in order to foreignize it as foreignization helps large business at the expense of the People, as it is Marxism they are trying to install. 88. Swarzeneggar then began appearing in the news and on the cover of TIME as a possible Presidential candidate. This is a legal nightmare as foreigners then shut out natural born women, protection of the Constitution is stripped from us before it is ever accorded to us, and if you are ‘elected’ only as a PAC buys the office for you then your allegiance is divided and in the case of WalMart we have a lot to worry about: 89. Because of the two party stranglehold that has now bankrupted this nation China owns about $750 billion in US debt. If China calls in this debt the US can’t pay it. China then can seize US interests, as it will attempt to use its nuclear threat. Current world leaders keep caving to this threat. However, WalMart came to my town, a military town, and threatened to force us into frivolous litigation if we fought it so I took WalMart up on its offer as WalMart may not force a military town nor women to fund their 57
own injury as we are then funding the male monopoly on legal power in the US, and more recently the overthrow of the Constitution, China’s economic growth and its ability to harm the US as well as WalMart’s PAC, again the largest in the nation, which seeks to elect anyone but ethical persons and is WalMart exerting undue influence as it seeks to control every sector of the nation not only the economy. See WalMart’s recent bid to enter the banking arena. 90. It’s well documented and an entire movie, “The High Cost of Low Prices” lays it all out: WalMart has been violating the Constitution left and right and has been given special favor after special favor by the Republicans. I entered an article stating that WalMart was warned that federal inspectors would be at its store so it had unfair advantage. Lots of favor is granted to WalMart. Currently it is in litigation – in federal court - over its treatment of women as it pays them less than men and refuses to pay overtime wages. It is common knowledge that WalMart acts in violation of the law. The whole nation is aware of this. The federal judge interviewed for the movie I named? She said that the WalMart lawyers lied, tampered with evidence and created evidence; she said that WalMart behaved so badly and so blatantly in her courtroom you’d think the people of Bentonville, Arkansas lived in a different nation than the US. WalMart’s activities are not a secret. 91. So when it threatened my town I said Fine as I know I have the PAC case. The real, actual reason you are not to do business with communist nations is that they can never, ever return the honor bond as they do not have any honor, as they do not believe in God thus no higher, outside authority and they contain the will and liberty of their people. If you contain the will and liberty of your people you then contain or restrain your energy. Not only is WalMart operating in China but it allows the Communist Party to run branches in its Chinese stores thus it is forcing Americans to fund communism. 92. I saw a Chinese town revolt. They took over city hall. But the leaders lured them away from city hall with the idea of a vote that turned out to be a ruse so city hall was turned back over to the criminals. What did the revolting citizens forget to do? Make a set of keys! Well, if you live in a town where WalMart is the only place to make keys and when you go to 58
make them a communist party boss will be alerted then you might hang. At lest twice Chinese citizens revolted and were crushed by their “government” with force. All American is doing then is helping the communists who are criminals but not any Chinese citizens and we’re also harming ourselves as we can, never ever benefit from any business we do with China and neither can any other person on Earth as Chinese “government” exists today. It’s illegal to do business with governments who state their intended goal is the US government’s demise as that means they intend to murder The People. 93. This is criminal all of the time – Nixon never meant for us to do business with China while they change nothing - and bad business all of the way around but it is especially heinous when we are fighting an illegal war over oil as what everybody is afraid of is that China will overtake a nation like Iraq and so seize its oil reserves. 94. We do not need oil; it’s a fossil fuel that is limited in supply and we have free energy sources but the two party monopoly which has an oil interest refuses to fund them. I know as I’m a physicist. We have had free energy sources as far back as 1940; the patents were removed from the US office but still exist in the British office. I myself have seen the photos and they look like the machine I have in my head as I live near the famous Coral Castle of FL and I know how Ed Leedeskin moved the massive blocks of stone he used to build the Castle. Most of these stones are larger than the stones that make up the Pyramid and he used no modern tools. He said any observant person could figure it out so I did some observing. He is correct; the answer is in plain sight but then again I had an idea as to what the answer was before I looked as a pyramid is on the back of our dollar bill and I live on the St. John’s – one of the only major rivers in the world to run north. All of this is arranged along lines of electromagnetic force and your blood is iron based for a reason: You mimic the design of Earth and then the universe. The Constitution does too as it accounts for the God consciousness and then human consciousness as men congress with other men but conspire with God; men do not congress with God. Commune with God yes but congress? No, as a 1st person meeting with your maker tends to be one sided as there’s no debate.
95. Like male scientists must step back and look at the whole universe as parts all working together – this solar system revolves around something and then this galaxy revolves around something; it’s not lone planets revolving around the Sun - so must federal judges when they look at this case or our government, as it is absolutes that also work as wholes and then all of it is within itself, as you have a constitution, you are a constitution and you’re in a Constitution. You have to be able to step back and so reason America as a part of the history of Earth, going smaller and smaller until you’re at the smallest particle: A lone voter. We collected the entire human record via collecting people from all over the planet. Then Americans collected the whole of Earth at once as went to the moon and looked back from upon the moon’s surface. I can reason anything around the Earth, in terms of human progress, and as to its place in the universe, as I know history and I know the law. I know people and people are dipole: 96. They don’t say a bad lawyer has gone south for nothing. He’s dead, as our compass as a living nation points to true north. I also know a lot about China, a dead and deadly government, so I began to think of the Chinese saying regarding an impossible balance existing between life and death, as we are a living government that is dying. I knew I could achieve that impossible balance with my vote. So I began to do it via federal lawsuit. 97. Realizing we have to deal with things as they are not as we want them I then had to deal with WalMart due to its PAC, China and the political parties ignoring the Constitution and acting as if it does not apply to women and neither does Marbury. Lucky for me the two parties were injuring me left and right and I know something China does not about energy and nuclear chain reactions. WalMart has two choices: Go out of business or start obeying the law. 1st, I can save them millions in litigation in the case involving women as I tangled with those attorneys and found them to be unethical. They are not in it to help the victims but to line their pockets as there is a very simple argument you can make against WalMart to win and all the attorneys had to do was give up the exorbitant fees they are charging. 2nd, I can defeat China and its army plus its nuclear threat with physics as China cannot carry out its threat...with my knowledge China would be made to think I snuck into its version of the Pentagon and stole all of its secrets. China does not know something about nuclear chain reactions that only I know. I already tested and 60
proved it as law. And once I disarm China? Then it can’t threaten to seize US assets and/or we can voluntarily settle that debt. 98. Without giving too much information away to China it has to do with an element nobody thought to factor in that became obvious to me. I have talked to survivors of Hiroshima and I visited White Sands on the one day a year it is open to the public. I lived in Truth or Consequences, NM near Socorro where the men who worked at White Sands were stationed so met some of them. I’ve been looking at nuclear reactions since I was 16. Once I won a debate over the nuclear question and guess what I know now? My science was all bad as I relied upon the work of others that seems as if it is good but it is not. I have been living in America for 42 years thus witnessing its slow death. Most of the science in textbooks is bad science and lying to our children is one reason we are in decline. “Science” – what is a law is not up for a popular vote but we started voting on it. Would we ever vote upon if a black person is a human? We vote upon if a woman is human all of the time. For instance, I can prove that you never truly split an atom or smash a particle so that you do something else when you set off a nuclear chain reaction that causes harm; that nuclear power is not the way to go as you cause damage you aren’t aware of - yet. It only seems as if we split an atom and we know particles reform after being smashed. Science, based upon appearances only, reasoned and collectively decided, “We can split the atom”. No, as you are never actually splitting it; it only seems as if and that appearance is very, very convincing but it is not reality; you don’t split it. Compare it to never being separated from the Creator or if you’re American never being separated from the government as you are the government: It only seems as if some of us are above others due to titles like President but we all have one vote so really we are in a row as links in a chain. So I had to go back to square one and redo all of the science as men have gone off the deep end making what is simple extremely complex as they are guessing but they make their guesses and their wrong answers sound great. They’re like lawyers when it comes to language. Science hit a dead end for the same reason US government did: No women. I’ll give you an example as I know what you’re thinking, if she’s this brilliant why haven’t I heard of her?, discrimination and the exact injury I suffered that’s why: Take the very well known two slits experiment. A scientist shoots a photon at a piece of paper with two slits in it. The photon lands on the other side of the paper 61
forming a pattern of stripes. The scientist can’t figure out what he’s looking at. Science scratches its head. It’s obvious to me: Photons travel as both a particle and wave at the same time; you’re seeing a photon move as both and you’re seeing what happens when a photon, energy or light, travels THROUGH space. The slits are like space; you move through space, as space is the stuff in between the particles of matter. You’re observing what time travel looks like as it is through space but within time. You’re observing what it looks like to travel from point A to point B a la Star Trek, through space and within time as all time is now. If you remove the paper with the slits the photons land in what appears to be a chaotic nonpattern as it is chaos; w/o any matter what would you travel between? As it’s all space! I’d tell you more but I’m not giving what I know away. So for years men looked at the two slits experiment and had no clue while I looked at it once and knew the answer. There’s even a simple experiment you can conduct to test this. It’s like this case: You have to stand back and look at the whole thing not only the parts. They all work together. Men concentrate on single absolutes; it’s harder for them to see the whole picture. Men read “WalMart” or “Obama” and become afraid, as they can’t see the whole argument for what it is. Like the case for equality unites us all the case for uniformity unites it all; you can’t separate the government from the universe, as it is one and the same. The models work the same. Politics, China, WalMart, the Executive, PACS, women - it’s all related. It’s US science that I copyrighted and patented on behalf of the US by going to SCOTUS first as US government is a science that China and no other nation has, as it is exclusive to the US. It’s science so advanced that will make the advances made in the 20th century look like child’s play. 99. So you never heard of me as I knew college had nothing to teach me so I taught myself and I gave up money in lieu of justice as I could have sold what I know and made a fortune. I gave up billions only to rub it in France’s face as they owe me a war debt and they insisted that the seat of particle physics left the US for France. I wrote to France: “It only seems that way due to Clinton, Bush and Obama but as I’m still here and I patented what I know in SCOTUS? Like the seat of legal power goes where I go the seat of particle physics gores where I go.” Actually I gave up billions for women and children – male and female children; I had to fully vest my commission as a right by going to SCOTUS first. Beating
France to the punch with only pen and paper and not a giant particle collider was a fringe benefit. 100. One of the things that hinders scientific advancement is politics. Like oil companies not wanting to go out of business so they suppress new energy sources. With WalMart China, WalMart is helping China create a need for oil so it competes with the US making all prices and taxes rise so then causing us to fund our own injury as the US keeps selling its debt. It becomes a vicious cycle. WalMart even sells gas now. And China is notorious for its human rights violations – exactly what WalMart does here. And if WalMart funds your campaign you aren’t going to act against it, are you? So WalMart and the US are at a tipping point as the US is turning Marxist and woman is the crux as woman is the mistake of the past the US has insisted upon making as in it refuses to elect one to two positions only and the Republicans and Democrats are responsible as are PACS: Chief Justice and President. That then creates a glass ceiling for all ethical citizens not only women. What you have is people who want to be able to violate the law versus those who want to enforce the law. WOMEN have the vested interest when it comes to enforcing the law as we’re the victims and we give birth. But men run most businesses and so keep women out. Women are forced to compete with a current effect of discrimination harming them: Men control most of the money as well as most of the offices. 101. The lawsuits that will be coming before the courts could cause WalMart and other companies to go bankrupt as they could be shut down completely or if ignored the situation could cause us to be invaded by an actual foreign army and we might lose. We are in the throws of death, exactly like Rome and Greece. You can say Bill Clinton played the saxophone while Rome burned as at times we exactly mimic the fall of Rome and Greece – look at our Senate collecting tribute and our utter lack of godliness as well as our seeming acceptance of rape and sex with minors - and that is because only we came up with a way to survive such a fall so we’re living the past out but with awareness – we can check the historical record thus compare ourselves to it - and so I know: A woman nonlawyer must do it as men can’t give birth to babies. Women protect children not men. Men disempower them to then be able to cause harm and once you target your children? You’re dead. Are we not causing our 63
children’s deaths from violence and obesity? People are now permanently injured as children. Check the record: A large population in Mexico died out when their children failed to thrive thus began dying around age 5. As men do not give birth the interest is not theirs and that is partly biology as birth forms a permanent bond so that a mother knows her children anywhere under any conditions. You want to act now before you pass the point of no return. Usually that’s a natural disaster, as with corrupted government you can’t overcome the effects of such a disaster. See Hurricane Katrina. So the effects after a disaster like contaminated food sources then kill you as government can’t meet the need and children die first; as you’re weakened? You can’t give birth to healthy babies. You physically die out as a People. If a disaster doesn’t do it invading armies do as in you lose the ability to defend yourself. You’re assimilated or killed. Your nation is no more. As no disaster has hit yet and no foreign army is in striking distance and there’s still something to be salvaged the time to act is now: 102. Nothing anyone has proposed is an actual solution, as they are not targeting the actual cause. Corruption in a constitutional nation that turns criminal? That is a symptom that the end is near; it’s a worst-case scenario. It’s like drug addiction – by the time a person takes drugs the disease has progressed to an advanced stage but you do not realize it until you see the effect, a person on drugs. We’re money addicts; we’re power addicts; we’re fame addicts. You see the effect when it turns criminal, usually when you’re a victim you finally admit to the truth of it, but it sets in long before it is ever realized in the physical. It’s generational and endemic, as it seems as if we hit a dead end from which there is no escape and that this generation will not do as well as our parents and that’s first. We’re measuring the wrong thing! We became addicted to outside authority instead of constitutional authority so all of these outside things run us. Our law reads “the pursuit of happyness” for a reason: It has nothing to do with the pursuit of money as money is not real but only has a value as you assign it worth in your head; you decide to accord it value; you believe it has value but it doesn’t. Subjected to crooks and criminal activity w/o relief? The People lost the human ability to know liberty as they lost the ability to feel it and once that happens? No justice. It’s made impossible as it is like losing a language. You need people who speak it and if you’re a Constitutional Republic you need people to live it, one at 64
the top and at least one voter on the bottom as you actually stand shoulder to shoulder as hierarchies are a convention your mind creates as they help you rationalize the suffering you experience. Go look: there’s no hierarchies in the Constitution so why do you obey them? Your terminal, that’s why. 103. Closing WalMart by establishing it aided and abetted China, our enemy, and purchased offices here places you in a worse position so shutting WalMart down is not reasonable. Lots of people are lobbying for WalMart’s instant demise. If they argue it correctly it’s possible as I did it. You have to deal with each issue going back and forth as you’re addressing cause versus effects; you slowly sort it all out by tackling the biggest bullies. WalMart allows me to take on all things political in the wrong way, the way our Founders never intended. Once WalMart threatened my town I had them, China and the political parties as my town board composed of Democrats and Republicans announced it would violate our will, violate our vote, as it was made to be afraid and we happen to have a Chinese sister city. The person who is now the mayor is a woman who said she changed her vote to YES as she was made to be afraid; that’s domestic violence as she was actually threatened and intimidated. Why she’s our mayor I can’t tell you, as I don’t vote for people who cave to threats but I had no liberty thus no choice. But we know that domestic violence is endemic as it is condoned upon a federal level by federal judges – SCOTUS refused to hear the case for women which involved domestic violence at least six times, five for me no matter how it happened and once for Nicholson V Scopetta, plus Bill Clinton committed domestic violence when he perjured himself regarding a sexual harassment case and when he won a Presidential campaign by insisting that all the women coming forward to testify against him were “bitches” and were lying. We also watched the Senate try to conduct a criminal hearing when both Thomas and Anita Hill were before it, then we had Bush V Gore which targeted women as w/o BVG then no Alito and no Roberts – Bader-Ginsburg would become Chief after Stevens. And Roberts is VERY young; you have to ask if Dick Cheney meant to harm us from beyond his grave? My true belief is YES. But thus far federal courts seem to be afraid of Dick Cheney and his minions which is how I ended up at a political rally but felt hate as I witnessed the ghost of Hitler awaken before my eyes and Americans did it: The officers of this nation have run 65
amok as businesses and political parties have been allowed to run amok, even inside SCOTUS. Twice Bader-Ginsburg stood down the male majority in the cases of women as she said their reasoning was unconstitutional as it made men an authority over women as if women had no authority over their own persons whatsoever, as if men owned them. She forgot to add we never had legal power and that second time? You act, you tell Roberts to stand aside as twice is no mistake. But this is a first for the US. It’s possible the justices are as ignorant as The People meaning they can’t know something. So domestic violence is endemic and federally perpetrated, it is, thus it is a violation of Article 4 Section 4 as BVG is a political question disguised as an equal protection and due process issue. It’s not even possible for BVG to be EP & DP if you’re a man or a member of the two major political parties and you use a lawyer who is not you! And it is tribute, it is akin to annointing a Caesar type leader, as WE fund the federal court but were shut out once the case caption became Bush V Gore. It’s a purely political and privately funded coup. It’s why they asked two questions. So, when I heard my mayor say she was changing her vote on the local news I did some digging: I stopped digging when the US officially announced you would need at least one billion dollars to RUN for the office of Executive and then published that finding. It’s in my first attachment. I went directly to WalMart with my legal argument as foreingization was already underway and as I had to stop WalMart immediately not in a few years. So by sending it to them I stopped them from building, which proves it is a good argument and proves I knew foreignization was already - long before I ever knew Obama’s name. I always knew I could come back and use the argument to end what PACS are doing by using my person as the missing link to then connect it all as while it seems to be complex it is not once you know all of the parts like how much US debt China owns. It’s as if I’m ground zero as I can answer any question you have and as this case can never be made on paper alone as the case is about life being proof. WalMart wants and needs to recognize my authority as not only can I protect it from China and save it millions in litigation but as a private citizen I can sue to own and operate WalMart but as the constitutional authority I can’t. A President may not seize a US business but a private citizen may. WalMart can never, ever get around its PAC and what it does to elections, how it caused a once open system to become a closed system and how it caused harm from the lone citizen up to the Executive thus incapacitates 66
The People. It actually stems from a local level, their employees, up to a national level, their PAC, and then international, their treaty with China; it’s a form of Marxism inserted and then enforced by favoring what isn’t constitutional over a long period of time no matter what excuse you use. Reasons do not matter. You can only cause so much harm before it all comes crumbling down and it did but in this case there’s a way to avoid the worst damage. WalMart needs me to survive what’s coming up in the future as it has done as much damge as can so now it will only harm its own self and the US needs me to survive China. WalMart actually has a vested interest in my appearance and me, as do all ethical citizens as I can restore us after the fall. I know how. 104. Like you can’t close WalMart abruptly you can’t end all political party activity. You can end one kind of politics but not the other. I address that later. 105. It is silly to be afraid of discussing our mistakes or maintaining the status quo to then maintain no order, as lawlessness is no order at all. Looking back over our mistakes is how I came to answer the questions the Founders asked including Madison’s “What exists at the founding of any great government?” And sometimes you have to go down a road to then have an answer thus you will have dead ends BUT the Founders never, ever meant for you to install or insert an institution and then refuse to remove it once it caused harm. Federal courts and other institutions have zero business tying our hands in any way. I blame a 1920 federal court ruling never overturned and meant to target blacks, women and Natives: The federal court ruling that says policy may not be litigated unless you can prove injury has occurred so it essentially forces you to become a victim before you sue a politician like a President for unconstitutional policy only now the injury that is realized first especially for women and children is death so you then can’t sue, can you? This ruling is political in nature as it was then exploited over and over by administration after administration. It might not have originally been political but it is now. NOTHING in the Constitution allows for victimization and policy is something you can reason as legal or not. No policy is ever gray rather than black or white. That’s a mistaken belief politicians want you to possess so you’ll go along with just about anything they propose. And if you’re kept out of court? You are forced to be a victim. This is where it can 67
become convoluted as federal judicial appointments are mostly: Political. Is the conflict one we can overcome? The results so far say No, federal judges aren’t willing to set politics and/or prejudice aside. Thus I’ll make yet another attempt: 106. Federal judges: I, Susan, will have to break this to you as I did to John Roberts: If you truly believe you were appointed for your talent get a new belief and soon as you weren’t. You were chosen for the federal bench based upon things and reasons other than what you’ll find in our Constitution. I have no idea if you’re fit or unfit; all I know is a politician thought he could use you. This is why you can’t look to any outside thing to then grant you approval as only you know what you are or aren’t and once you award your custody to any outside person or thing? It has power over you. At the end of the day and your life you answer to yourself and your maker and account for it all including every thought and feeling. You might escape punishment on Earth but the Creator will judge you and he knows exactly what you were thinking and feeling when you authored a ruling. Nobody else has a say when your case is before The Creator so why give them power over you, to judge you or to cause you to be judged, while on Earth? What you need to understand is that the persons who appointed you as you were picked were not interested in your ability; they were more interested in how you might rule in certain cases. They believe they can profile you thus predict how you’ll rule. They believe you’ll subconsciously rule for affiliations you have with them. They expect that you’ll feel grateful so act it out on paper. You then are accidentally playing into their hands as The People do not realize that you have no idea this is about what others believe about you, what a person reasoned and decided is the truth of you, not what you actually believe and not what you actually are so when you cater to lawyers and refuse to give the citizens standing? It seems as if you are working for the politicians. The one and only way to prove your actual beliefs and actual ability is: Within your rulings, by hearing The People. It’s not as if we fear losing it’s that we are not even given the opportunity to lose as we aren’t allowed to appear. This fatally diseased government? When you empower lawyers at the expense of citizens you then empower the politicians – the guys who appointed you. The politicians need the lawyers to execute their corruptions of the law. Lawyers enter your courtroom intending to play a game with the silent understanding you’ll let them go so far before reining them in so they 68
calculate the damage they need to do. Nobody in your courtroom and nobody who read your name on any list has any actual respect for your ability – it’s a lie perpetuated by ego. It seems as if you do it with deliberation as you can’t fathom that you were chosen to sit for any reason but justice; it’s not possible federal judges are picked to then force certain rulings. Newsflash: If all of your fellow judges had ability and had the intention of ruling according to the Constitution would we be in this mess? All you can do then is act for yourself and so separate yourself from the pack as at every hearing it’s a form of peer review as it is supposed to be about The People not the lawyers, not the politicians and not the privateers so as you shut us out you then have snakes reviewing you currently. What kind of validation is that? How can you ever measure yourself or set your compass correctly if actual snakes are your measure? Your perception is skewed but once you own up to the fact you were flattered into believing the guy who hired you chose you for your ability when he did not? You’re liberated from that. How would you feel if you’re Roberts? I saw Roberts with Bush and I heard Bush. Then I read those signing statements. Bush did not write them nor choose Roberts as he couldn’t. WHO believes it when a man without any legal ability says he admires yours? I would have had a question for Bush: why me? Tell me why. Think of the politician who appointed you. Do you truly believe he himself found you? Do you truly believe he read one of your rulings and screamed, “Find me that man as he is this nation’s greatest legal mastermind!”? The truth is: He sat at a desk while somebody passed him a list and went over the pros and cons of that list. “Professionals” compiled that list. YOUR name came up. It could be any fact of you but it is not ability as the last thing any crook can have is an independent, constitutional federal judge. These people look for perceived flaws. Who cares? It’s a lifetime appointment and now you get an opportunity to become Eisenhower’s Warren to whomever appointed you: The worst mistake he ever made. If you were hired for a reason other than ability, if someone looked at you and for whatever reason said “This one’s mediocre; he won’t cause any trouble” then you exact the sweetest of all revenge by proving you actually have ability. Once you shatter the illusion that you serve anyone but The People? You’re liberated from the institutions. Discovering you were picked as you’re black or as you’re a woman or as you’re Catholic isn’t so bad as physics dictates if your name was not your name or you didn’t major in sociology only as you liked the 69
textbooks you would not be sitting so who cares how you came to be sitting as EVERY FACT OF YOU COUNTS EVEN IF THOSE WHO APPOINTED YOU DO NOT KNOW IT. You have the edge then and always did as you know all of your facts but they do not! Thus you can and will overcome the conflict created by the confluence of private interests and politics. 107. If you look at my very first SCOTUS petition you will see that I named 1952 and Richard Nixon’s “Checker’s” speech as my point of causation as every single element was present: China, Nixon, a brand new Chief Justice chosen from the outside, crafty language, speechwriters putting words in a presidents mouth, blaming women for what men do and illegal campaign funding in the form of a secret war chest the republicans amassed. At this point, as that money was meant to stop women and blacks from exercising legal power as a block as they were now voting as such for the first time, it became impossible for any women to overcome the unjust, corrupted systems and the money as women have such a large disparity that is yet enforced today by denying them legal power. It’s important that I named Nixon and 1952 as my point of causation after the Revolution as reasoning that led me to know if China ever harmed me here, in America, then I had my point of intrinsicity as it was only made possible by political parties and their policies plus privateers as in private money, that war chest, and foreigners with foreign interests who are allowed to run this nation from behind the scenes. Nixon and China, so I knew on the day WalMart made its announcement that I needed to act as every element came alive: That very next morning at 8 AM I phoned SCOTUS and was injured as my rights were violated and then I phoned the Navy and my rights were violated. I entered my phone bill so it’s on the federal record. This covers both President and Commander then thus made it possible for me to adjudicate the commission as the Navy exactly said it was injuring me and not assisting me – it was not recognizing me – as they wanted me to actually stand down the President and/or Chief Justice and so return with the actual paper commission. It matters not if the Navy violated the law; the action alone vests the right and interest and the proof is that I phoned the Navy and worked the chain of command until I spoke to a Commander as who does that – who can - if she’s not the legal President BUT the Navy informed me it needed to see the actual paper (or witness me appear and so hear me do it) after the SCOTUS 70
clerks announced they would forever withhold it form me and all women. This then created a legal situation whereby the in violation of the law withholding of the commission, living and dead, MUST be adjudicated according to Marbury as the Navy said if not for that then they would not be injuring me or any woman. That alone made the commission a part of my defense but I kept placing it on the court record when I could most recently in person in NY as I stood as the actual defendant and any case of constitutional authority is then both offense and defense as you are defending yourself and the nation by going on the offense as you aren’t in violation of the law – they are. I so knew China was the point that proves our death I later wrote to SCOTUS: “MacArthur left my commission somewhere near the 38th parallel.” What happened then? North Korea than began to threaten us with nuclear weapons. That’s because I am correct about China and my ability to defeat it; my person is lining up with the law or truth of the universe. As the problem seems so large and so deeply embedded everybody, mostly men within the institutions like the NY Appellate or FBI, denies it exists and ignores it. The People are labeled “conspiracy nuts”. Or no woman can be an actual genius. I get, “If you are so smart why aren’t you rich and famous?” all of the time. But I hear something else: Politics as everybody’s afraid of the ruling class. They’re afraid to upset the applecart. You may not and you cannot deny the truth: 108. Once Sol Wachler was removed for pleading out to domestic violence? Justice in NY was impossible, as the entire government has fallen once the Judiciary has. Usually your judiciary is the last branch to go but in NY the judiciary fell before the Executive, as Spitzer was able to hide his actions for so long. That’s it, as he hid them from the public but not his party or other state employees. Party leaders told Vanity Fair they knew something was up with Spitzer as I read and then entered the article. People know but fail to act or cover it up – for political reasons. You can remove Wachler and then even Spitzer; you still have a situation whereby justice is nonexistent as you must remove everyone under them as they hold the top offices that can and may invoke the power of one over the citizens. There’s nobody after them but SCOTUS but I knew as Clinton fell and then Bush V Gore was heard that SCOTUS was a waste of my time – frivolous – as if SCOTUS installs a President are they likely to then remove him? No as that would constitute SCOTUS pleading out but it’s 71
possible if the Justices are ethical only in my unique case I had to deal with Thomas, Alito and Roberts and they made it frivolous as politics and the Senate’s hatred of women interfered with the Thomas nomination, Alito is a man when plenty of qualified women were overlooked to maintain a male majority and Roberts is a politically motivated appointment meant to prevent Bader-Ginsburg from becoming Chief after Stevens. It was very easy to go back and check the record – the facts like names, dates, times, places and exact words – and so put this together. It’s not my opinion but history. You can never, ever make the claim that Roberts was anything but a politically motivated appointment and another blow in the long series of assaults that SCOTUS has suffered at the hands of the parties as they shut the citizens out so the only people entering SCOTUS are lawyers affiliated with the parties or with a political agenda which is why terrorists get in and women do not. The tactics they use are meant to be direct attacks upon SCOTUS as the people responsible meant to shake our faith in the Constitution. You accidentally asked a Justice to go duck hunting when you had a case coming before the Court? It’s meant to strip all power from The People. The only point in entering SCOTUS on paper then if you know as absolute fact justice is made impossible is to vest the right and the interest as entry in person is never going to happen as SCOTUS clerks told me they’d keep me out. No matter how I reasoned this for authorities they insisted if you removed Wachler you had justice magically restored and when WOMEN NEVER HAD IT TO BEGIN WITH. Not one person understood reality, chain of command or authority thus once SCOTUS installs a President you are screwed as you go to SCOTUS before you go to the Whitehouse not after!!! If you go to SCOTUS after you go to the Whitehouse via the vote? If you bring the Whitehouse before SCOTUS? A crime has been committed as that’s the only possible way this happens as what is after the Whitehouse? The People, The People come after the President not SCOTUS so if you bring the President or Whitehouse into SCOTUS after that person or administration has been elected by The People, people who now are denied standing as SCOTUS never granted it to anyone but lawyers and seeks to maintain SCOTUS certified lawyer as a special honor and privilege so SCOTUS is worshipping dead paper, then you have handed this nation over to LAWYERS hired by POLITICAL PARTIES as you have come to your end as there’s no place to go after SCOTUS. If you can’t get inside SCOTUS you won’t get inside the Whitehouse and if 72
you can’t get inside the Whitehouse? You own it and fund it so it’s criminal, as that case never, ever should have gained entry so how did it? And what did Susan know that nobody thought was relevant? Greg Rinckey, the lawyer who lost my case with deliberation and admitted it all over his brief which he signed and entered against my will and w/o my consent, was assigned to my case as he is exNavy and SCOTUS certified! He’s got a Service Cross or so I was told that I want returned. So if the Navy did not peg this creep for who and what his character actually is and SCOTUS certified him no matter how it happened justice is made impossible for any citizen as obviously politicians or worse lawyers who are politicians are certifying each other in a massive conflict of interest that dates back to 1790. Doesn’t Congress award medals like the Service Cross? You need two signatures to be certified on paper according to the SCOTUS rules or you need to gain entry directly by filing pro se – I reasoned the latter – so when I tested the system by attempting to secure those two signatures? I could not get one – not even after I entered directly on paper! Congress merely pretended I never asked. So then: I had zero opportunity, the political parties are guilty and today anybody can buy a diploma online and get those two signatures thus enter SCOTUS – if he or she knows somebody via political affiliation. Would I have said what I said in PA if I knew SCOTUS was going to keep me out unconstitutionally? If I knew justice wasn’t even possible? You can’t ignore the politics of upstate NY or that Garrett Murphy is a Democrat and the National director of Literacy for NY. I prove the injury ran up and down the chain of command in such a way it is reverberating and so doubling, tripling and quadrupling back. 109. The real, actual reason you never go to SCOTUS (or any federal court) after you go to the Whitehouse? If it already happened as in BVG you go back to federal court only as you wrongly went there and must undo BVG to restore law and order but: Ideally you never take an election there as: The place to go after the Whitehouse stands before SCOTUS is the US military. You seize Command of the Armed Forces as I did and retake DC in order to retake possession of the original documents, the paper commission belonging to The People. Then you retake all of The People’s property like Congress and the actual Whitehouse. A presidential election decided in SCOTUS always means war as this nation was not born inside SCOTUS so it’s a war against The People that will turn bloody unless you 73
have a genius in your midst who is paying close attention and is willing to act upon what she knows. The US lucked out this time. The first time should be our last time as twice is no mistake. This was one of our closest calls as a nation. This is also why you avoid Commanders who have strong ties to political parties and/or businesses as you can’t have an out of control dictator replacing the crooks as that is equally lethal. Franklin said who cares if one guy robs you or a mob robs you? as it’s still robbery or: you’re still a fallen Republic. It’s why political parties are a bad idea all around: how could I know I would have to commandeer the US Armed Forces? Political party membership would have prevented me from doing it. To be organized but still actually independent? You’re a party of one. 110. Sam Walton himself looked at PACS and said he would not be creating a PAC as he believed they were bad for his customers. He shied away from politics as he knew business and politics makes for bad bedfellows. By customer he meant people who walk in off of the street and his employees. He drops dead, his kids create a PAC, they move to China, they support communism, they assault and batter Americans (and inside federal courts) and then American business packs up and leaves in general. PACS: Who benefits? Businesses who then fund politicians and get kickbacks come earmarking time. Not only do you end up aiding and abetting China thus making war on the US as China wants and needs us dead but I entered the state rules for the office of Executive as even the least restrictive state allows you to buy your way onto the ballot by paying a fee. The rules do not ask you to prove ability and the rules are unreasonable in that they are all over the place but in every state you can buy your way onto the ballot. Go back to the source of that money that is fueling everything: Look at any list of the richest Americans and look at any list of the wealthiest, highest paid CEOS. Look at all CEOs. How many women are listed? 111. If you look the four PAC cases Souter complained about are all the same all you need to read are the captions. What’s missing? WOMEN. You need to be able to prove PACS cause harm by tracing the effects as some effects then become causes as Federalists Ten states. You need to prove PACS overthrow the Constitution as private interests use them to do it. As this is such a large case and it’s all related I decided the easiest way to tackle it was to separate the entities thus starting with myself and 74
working my way up. As for party/campaign funding in general? Recent reform is a bust. The money factor causes people to join political parties as they can’t overcome the money w/o the party...or can they? We can just toss out the money and the parties completely thus prevent the purchasing of offices as we already have a system in place to campaign for a place on the ballot if you are a private, independent natural born citizen: I, Susan, prove for only $1.27 you can secure the Office and/or a place on the actual ballot in all 50 states by making a case for The People in federal court. My bank statement listing $1.27 in my account in April 2007 is entered. Ideally The People need to heal themselves – that’s most important - thus any person so motivated can choose one of the federal questions afoot and argue it thus vesting his or her right and interest. You can address a violation of the Constitution to vest it like Baltimore charging for videos but not any other media: When is James Bond free versus when is James Bond not free? Does form matter? Isn’t “The Spy Who Loved Me” always the same spy who loved me whether it’s a book, a film, a book on tape or a record by Carly Simon? If I sent Sean Connery into the library with Woody Allen’s library card and Daniel Craig’s driver’s license would he be made to pay and/or qualify himself in order to see Pierce Brosnan as James Bond? Himself as James Bond? Is this an unjust tax that targets the poor and the deaf? You can remedy an injury. It’s your choice. That constitutes you proving you can fulfill the oath if we elect you and guess what? As The People fund the federal court it’s bang for our buck. You won’t have many people who succeed; that is you won’t have so very many that the ballot is overrun and you address the citizens having their right to enter the courts violated at the same time. If you use a jury then the jury gets to award you that place on the ballot or not as a second, separate question a part from the point of law as your argument might win the day but might not be Executive in nature. It’s a system The People can use now until we have a new system and until this mess is sorted out and it’s wholly constitutional as that person is vetting him or her self then by subjecting themselves to the review of The People thus it is voluntary as outside vetting is not legal. ONLY qualified, natural born citizens can do this. It’s like I told Obama: to prove his innocence and natural birth status? Obama had to enter his answer before I entered my brief and he did not so first one to the bar wins as obviously she’s natural born as her actions produced unique, original, intellectual property that benefits the US and she even gave up the profits as she copyrighted it in 75
the name of The People not herself. It’s the quickest way to heal the injury and the quickest way to cause the People to feel actual liberty once again. It’s not about the appearance of your documents but what you, the person, bring to court as you then have to support the paper to the level of proof by yourself. You have to be able to produce in person; you have to be able to argue it yourself no matter what it looks like on paper as even if you enter the most professional documents we’re ever seen, a Founder might have written them as they look so good, but you can’t string two words together in person? We possess reasonable doubt. This then would inspire people to obey, enforce and uphold the Constitution as they would know as fact the door would be open for them if they wanted or needed to walk through it; it would be possible and you never know what will happen in life: I, Susan, am a past President. I actually vested the right and the interest in 7th grade as class President. It counts, as it is as valid as any national election as The People duly elected me, I served two terms and retired as I graduated. SCOTUS was I then legally vesting it. The People do not participate when they feel as if it and they do not count. The People need a reason to invoke the law from the time when they are children so they come to embody it and then to continue to enforce it, avoiding all negative contracts. As The People have been working on reform plans this would give us time to evaluate and implement one of those plans and if we chose one that did not work? We’d have a fail safe back up system to rely upon the control of which rests wholly with The People. 112. The following is the recently dismissed case mistakenly filed as a prisoner’s motion as it contains the details of a hate crime perpetrated by a political party as if you read it again you’ll see I wrote that I felt hate. And I don’t know what Resolution 511 is if it isn’t hate as it stomps all over the Constitution and makes the Federal Judiciary useless as it has been replaced with the House Judiciary Committee. Congress, ruled by the two party monopoly, uses the House committee to prevent citizens from suing in federal court. I witnessed the rise of a military dictatorship in the US. All of the above is involved and caused it; it’s matter of sorting out causes and effects. One effect? HATE. I have felt hate twice in my life so I know it: 113. The wrongly dismissed part of the complaint: On 11/09/09 I, Susan, became the very first citizen ever to receive a default judgment from 76
SCOTUS. This happened as I have always known Bush V Gore referred to here as BVG was and is a tie that served to uncheck all offices and strip all natural born citizens of their vote thus all of their rights. It’s 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, 1 v 1, as nothing else is legal nor is it good math. It especially harms women and enlisted service members and harmed me directly and grossly, until I suffered physical death but survived. Although this should be impossible this is what happens when SCOTUS rules wrongly and so installs a President thus makes law upon a case that has zero basis in our Constitution living or written and when it then awards the Office of the Executive to lawyers not on the ballot giving legal standing to pieces of paper not people so that SCOTUS has committed what constitutes a coup and has overthrown the Constitution but then refuses to admit to what it did only as I, Susan, the person who made the case happens to be a woman who is not a lawyer. See attachments C and 5, Herbert V Obama also in this court. 114. There was a fire in my home so this is a few days late. It may take me a few more days to send in one or two other parts of this case as the fire ended up destroying some documents. The facts regarding the Libertarian, Democratic and Republican Parties begin at number 7. 115. This complaint is brought under USC 1983 and USC Chapter 18 but firstly under the Declaration and Constitution as acts of Congress, acts of SCOTUS with the other Judiciary and acts of the sitting Executive past and current conflict with the Constitution as does law the citizens made via a direct vote of The People as nothing within the Constitution, US case law or US code allows for the citizens to make law via a direct vote, to violate the natural birth, equal protection and due process clauses via a direct vote or to target women, enlisted serviced members or me and my sons exactly via a direct vote. And nothing provides for the violation of fully vested fundamental rights which go w/o redress and w/o any actual remedy and relief as nothing grants any citizen not even Presidents and Justices blanket immunity. See US V Nixon. I also have standing to sue to enforce a judgment of default entered by SCOTUS and am in the correct court as the very first violation of a fundamental right was perpetrated by the federal government while I and my children were Navy dependents and this violation is directly linked to a former Executive and unconstitutional policy he invoked as well as a crime he committed which 77
Congress then excused, as if it never happened. As it’s core this judgment of default occurred because every single sitting officer I came in contact with and every single citizen reasoned and decided they or other officers and/or lawyers were above the law while I and my sons were below it or less than human and as they insisted that US law provided for no remedy and relief. It is directly due to women never having been accorded actual equal protection and due process and as women have never been able to bring the case for equality before SCOTUS as it is either argued incorrectly, it is not heard w/o any reason or cause named, men not women bring it, no pro se litigants are allowed before SCOTUS and unconstitutionally so, and/or the person bringing it is unconstitutionally denied redress for the violation of her rights perpetrated by SCOTUS employees. 116. Jurisdiction: 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 – 1412: I have read it and this venue then would be proper as prior court activity occurred in this district and as this may be the only venue left via process of elimination. Plus as this is an authority case ANY federal venue would be appropriate as one of the concerned parties, female voters, lives here. 117. What began as a family case over custody escalated until I was challenging men inside SCOTUS and even SCOTUS itself as ultimately they and it caused the injury. The case spanned several states and was and is in court in three: NY, PA and FL. as the creation of impossible standards then created legal limbo; either no action is taken thus the case sits and sits or the states harm me with impunity. 118. The SCOTUS docket proves my claims – it along with me constitutes incontrovertible proof - but in this unique case I must now sue those involved in order to address an intrinsic flaw in the process which now denies us our rights in order to force sitting officers, whole institutions and the voters to recognize the law and my person and so the equality of women, the legal and biological reality they deny, or, to enforce the judgment of default. 119. Both major parties are guilty. I‘ll deal with the Republicans first: In the fall of 2004 I went to a political rally sponsored by the Republicans at which George Bush Jr. was to appear. Ultimately I received the shock of 78
my life, as I am a witness to genocide born in the US. For years sociologists have been looking for this answer as have I. Scientists could name the elements and which conditions did not seem to matter; they could not name the cycle or the pattern or if they had every element or how they came together. I can answer this question due to the Republican Party. 120. Several elements do need to exist plus they do come together in a very specific way and scientists are wrong: I now know what comes before the eruption of mass violence so that I can state as fact what happened in Rwanda may have been longer in coming then anyone ever imagined. The best way I know how to say it to a federal judge: An event such BVG or 9/11 occurs; there seems to be an escalation of fear plus injustice. BVG is very, very important – what it is and does to cause genocide is intrinsic – but 9/11 is not very consequential because all it needs to be is anything the leaders can use as an excuse to act unjustly or create more irrational fear, what I named suspicious fear: be suspicious; be worried; your neighbor may be your enemy; you can’t see your enemy. It’s a rev up. Then all necessary elements are realized in one time and one place and so genocide ripens. I saw the event that no one ever saw before; when and how it ripens so that mass violence may erupt. At this point it’s possible as the ‘machine’ is in place and the people did it once so it is then alive and what I witnessed and what I know tell me that IS how Nazi Germany was born and nobody realized it but not what Rwanda saw as Rwanda had no central cult personality surrounded by ‘officers’ who actually did all the dirty work. However I can answer the questions about Rwanda, as now I know what no other person ever knew. 121. This sounds awful; it is. Bush Jr. is not guilty; he had no idea what happened before he arrived and I saw him flinch when a person held up a sign reading Jews for Bush. Why? The hate speech, that’s why. I saw Jews cheering for their own extinction, women cheering for their own extinction and enlisted service members cheering for their own extinction. The news is not all bad: As I was there the US can now own up to it and then take credit for giving the world an answer that can stop genocide forever. The whole event is on tape and I have a witness: A Vietnam Veteran as it seemed that only he and I and perhaps a few other Veterans
knew something had gone horribly wrong. I, Susan, knew the exact word - genocide - and so I became terrified and fled for my life. 122. We know BVG and everything that happened up to fall 2004 – a time before we knew it is a bad declaration of war. The Republicans said you had to arrive 5 hours before the event or you couldn’t get in. 5 hours in the baking sun in FL in a football stadium; it was an oven. To get in you had to pass through ‘security guards’ – members of the Republican Party or at least the guy who touched me was. They began roughing people up. They began confiscating silly things only to throw them out as if you had to leave it they were dumping it not leaving it for you to claim. So a mood developed. 123. Now we’re in the stadium. As it heats up the concession stands are charging outrageous prices for drinks and food. You have five hours of this. Then the toilets overflow all over the stadium. It is getting worse and worse and worse. I can feel the mood shifting and I begin to realize what I might be witnessing but I keep telling myself it’s impossible. I’m thinking this can’t be but I know genocide so the only word I have is ripen, maybe this is how it ripens so then the possibility of mass violence exists at any time; maybe it’s not possible until it ripens. I now know that’s it, it must ripen. Something is made physically real. Exacting thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs along with motivation and intent combined with issues regarding power, victimization, justification not justice and morals not ethics is made real. The otherwise ‘good’ civilians doing it? They are the targeted victims and do not even know it; they are unaware they have been actively ‘recruited’ to participate and so do not know they have been deliberately targeted. This is important, as coming into play in order to keep the recruited participants unaware is a cycle of blame, shame, anger and guilt. 124. A Vietnam Veteran sits down. Everybody is talking and he begins talking about John Kerry; he’s not here to ask you to vote for Bush as he’s here to tell us: WHATEVER YOU DO YOU CAN NOT VOTE FOR KERRY; EVEN DON’T VOTE AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT CAST YOUR VOTE FOR KERRY. He has no idea who he’s voting for due to the candidates – none of them are fit; none of them are safe. You’re either
safe or not; safety is or not. There’s no such thing as a little safety or a little liberty. So people start asking him questions. 125. I listen to him talking and I stop him: I have a question: “I know about the Swift boats; I hear Swift boat everything. Now you just said something – unfit for command. I don’t need to know about Swift Boats. Why did you, a person not here to vote for Bush and a veteran just say unfit for command like you did? What’s YOUR reasoning?” So he said, “He lied about the return of his medals.” I reply, “Okay now I know: Violation of a renegotiated honor bound contract. He’s unfit to command.” This happens to be one of the most grievous offenses you can commit. You give up your medals as it is your claims THE PEOPLE have violated the Declaration and Constitution wholly and absolutely in your case. You are no longer a party to the contract. If things change and the contract is renegotiated the President representing THE PEOPLE reawards your medals. At that point? You had better not look sideways if looking sideways is a violation. A lie? A violation. Cheating? A violation. Running for any office when not fit to serve? A violation. This nation needs to get right with itself: all the proof I ever wanted or needed was that Veteran saying he came here on his day off not to vote for Bush but to stop me from voting for Kerry. If he said or did nothing else that is the proof. I believe Vietnam Veterans: I do not believe one of them: John Kerry. How many veterans have to tell me if you elect that man you might be killed? 1. Not 2, not 20, not 75 but 1. 126. So all day long things worsen, it’s more heaped on top of what feels as if it is unbearable, it’s like a sewer, until the hate speech begins. Like nothing I have ever heard in my life. The speakers begin and it is insanity from the get go; it has been building up all day as there were acts like musicians every once in a while so a person would grab a mike and blurt something out or they would broadcast something to ‘entertain’ us while we waited. It is a mixture of politicians and party leaders plus well known locals. An ex-Model named Kim Alexis gives a speech. [Kim Alexis is a person, a good person, who then participated. Why? I know why. This is my reasoning for naming her - not as she’s guilty but as she has some of the most priceless living testimony ever as she was there and she did it but she did not know.] From among the speakers she stood out as she’s a woman and a mother and her words made my blood run cold. Certain words and slogans are repeated ad infinitum. Bloody, bloody, baby, 81
women, Christian, bloody, murder, and on and on. Men get up. Jesus, bloody, baby, women, murder, drugs. THIS IS A CHRISTIAN NATION. Over and over and over. You think it’ll stop or somebody will react but they do not. Now it’s bloody, baby, women, WAR, JESUS, WAR, bloody, Christian, abortion, bloody. I’m getting more and more concerned. I’m watching it all, taking it all in as now I know: I am about to see how genocide is born; I’m gonna know – how did the Nazis do it, why good people did it and why the Jews didn’t act. I want the court to note: I always knew I’d have to give this answer to the Jews then the rest if the world. Once I knew I was actually seeing it? I captured it all in my minds eye paying special attention to: the emotions. Those I captured in my body; you can sort of internalize them to recall them later. It’s a gift, as I have an instrument that is perfectly calibrated – my ears – as I listen different, with my entire person; I record or memorize things differently than other people do. It’s related to how I process language so that I experience the actual whole truth while others experience only a part of it or miss it completely. I was experiencing the truth of the whole event in that stadium; others missed it entirely while that Veteran knew most of it. That’s because: If your person matches US law in letter and sprit, if you have those same beliefs and practice them, your emotional compass is very finely tuned. Mine happens to be perfectly calibrated the way a perfumer has a perfectly calibrated nose or a taste tester has a perfectly calibrated tongue. It’s what makes me such a deadly constitutional attorney: If an argument or ruling – or a belief - does not match the Constitution? I’ll know it and I’ll know exactly what it is and why. It will light up like a Christmas tree for me. Then I can read what the Justices wrote and know: This is what the lawyer needs or this is what they all missed or this is where the Justices erred. Sometimes I will read one or two sentences and know; other times the caption alone will tell me. Often I can even identify what mistaken belief specific people involved in the case have as it’s all over the paper but they do not realize it, as they aren’t doing what I’m doing. As people produce paper? I can listen to a piece of paper the same way I can listen to a person. 127. The stadium feels like it is filling up with water, as if we’ll drown, and the crowd is cheering insanely and then suddenly on the jumbotron is a JEWS FOR BUSH sign. The crowd cheers; Bush flinches – he knows something is wrong as it is the way they cheered – only he says 82
something like “We’re a Christian nation but there’s room for Jews too.” And there it was; it ripened: This crowd let up a roar EXACTLY like the People hearing Hitler let out. It’s distinctive; I will never forget the sound and feeling of it. The extreme physical discomfort; the extreme heat and smell of the overflowing bathrooms; the anger; the nonstop hate speech; the imagery, very detailed ideas of graphic violence regarding women and babies but labeled Christianity, mixed with the emotions that were swirling around as if waves washing over the participants and the sound of that roar rising like an expectant release of joy, eagerness, but joy for violence and death; a religious fervor for a political agenda whether it is constitutional or not and no matter who it harms, so urgent even your own person is expendable for the good of the cause. The sound that the crowd made in that one incredible roar was deeper and more intense than any cheering I have ever heard but the intensity of the emotion is what frightened me the most, as if these people were made to be temporarily insane, actually insane, as they were feeling joy but expressing the idea of blood and death for no named reason, so that expressing this insane idea purposely – This is a Christian nation - to then feel that emotion became their cause and became their reason. If they expressed that idea – those words in that order no matter how senseless they are in the context of America - they were rewarded with that emotion – joy - so death and the idea of killing women and babies made them feel good as it cannot be murder if Christians do it. The emotion itself became their god; the emotion itself became their cause and they would say or do anything to get it. I do not like to use the word joy, perhaps joy infused with pride, you’re proud to be killing women in the name of Jesus, as to feel this you need to have other people around you who engage in a sort of give and take. It’s as if you need that outside approval to then feel the emotion, that to get that approval is to then be able to feel it. I witnessed what happens when individuals have had their sense of self annihilated to such an extent and degree that they then ‘adopt’ a collective created sense of self, a sense of self that is located completely outside each person so that if the group promotes it you then identify with it – you are it or so you truly believe – thus you feel good when you express it, even it is insensible like equating Christianity with death instead of life. You have traded your will for the will of the crowd; you have replaced I with us, not we. The people in that crowd could not tell you what they were cheering for if you asked them; all they could do is say exact words but not delineate any actual 83
concept or any actual belief. Human emotion without any reason; unconditional pride. The Nazis had unconditional pride; it was their sense of self; it was directly wired to their id but that id only exists as a group. It doesn’t exist if the group doesn’t exist. Each individual had wholly conditional love, indifference, directly wired to his or her ego. It’s human emotion without reason as a group and human reason without emotion as an individual. It’s how and why each individual could be so brutal – they felt so good doing it. It’s how and why they were such effective killing machines, as they could operate either in a group or alone. Compare it to what you know: How hard does a group have to work to get even one person to do what he or she would never do, such as convince a person to commit rape only as the others in the group pressure him? How hard does a group have to work to convince one person to do something ‘smaller’ like rob? It used to be impossible in America; now it is common and nobody blinks. Kill reason first by battering them with words, render them powerless – they must feel powerless both mentally and physically – and then insert a new idea over a long period of time but do it in such a way you make them truly believe it as real, ‘it’s America’, as you cement it inside them with that one, massive, final blow: visual imagery, auditory imagery – all of your senses being attacked - and with a wallop of emotion that feels unbelievably fantastic. But I felt terrified. I know now that a person could have held up a sign that read Kill The Jews and I would have heard that same roar as long as the person ‘leading’ the crowd condoned it and so did the guy sitting next to you. Hitler’s big lie only it is bigger and much more insidious than anyone ever suspected. 128. At that exact moment it felt as if the water had risen over my head and I was going to drown; I was actually going to die. I was going to suffocate. Nobody was stopping it; I knew exactly what had to happen for mass violence to erupt. I knew I could do something exactly and we’d have mass violence. And somebody might do that accidentally. I took one look at that Veterans face and fled for my life. He was silent and he had a look of confusion and revulsion on his face; his silence was different as it was as if he couldn’t move. He KNEW something had gone horribly wrong but he did not have the word “genocide” in his head or he would have had a different look on his face. The person I attended this event with? That person was cheering; he had no idea what had happened and when I fled he kept trying to tell me that I was ‘crazy’ and making it up; he was 84
absolutely clueless as to what he had just been deceived into doing. He absolutely, positively did not hear the lie he was just told, the lie of his life, the most lethal and deadliest lie of all: They will think for me; I don’t have to think; I don’t have to feel. 129. I then went back over the record of genocide that we have. Nazi Germany and Rwanda are the same; it’s the same but it is realized a slightly different way. It has to do with power and control; a created fear; there’s a rev up or a cycle; there’s an event, a moment in time where it ripens; and if one thing happens after that point? Mass violence will erupt unless the chain set in motion is broken. Genocide is already, before mass violence erupts. You might slaughter people in one day or you do it a few at a time in an illegal war or at home killing women; it might take you five years to kill them all but it’s mass violence and is genocide. In person I can go over this in fine detail and reason it all for you. I have to do this for all citizens but especially for all political parties so they never go here again. I also have to break or sever the chain set in motion with BVG as once it ripened? That chain was never broken; it is still in motion today and is being realized various ways like the John Woo memos discussing if they could invoke martial law to then use the military to lock up Americans w/o cause, w/o any hearing or trial and w/o any charges. Yes, in concentration like camps. Those memos are more serious than anyone knows. What has not yet happened is the sudden explosion of violence, which is not so sudden but only appears to be. If the American people want to know who the Hitler in their midst is I will tell them and trust me, if I could not prove this beyond any doubts – not reasonable doubt but any doubt – I would not say it: Dick Cheney. Cheney should be very afraid of me, as there’s a whole lot of things that he did that he truly believes he has gotten away with; things he is certain no one will ever know or couldn’t know, things I can prove. I’m not ‘figuring out’ who did what as I know as fact without any question whatsoever as following a chain of people is easy for me. Cheney might believe he did something behind closed doors so you can’t know but you can; if you have my unique skill you can follow that chain anywhere and know anything. 130. I do not want say much more about this event on paper. It’s too important. You have all of the fact you need as I’m not to be forced to prove my case within my complaint. 85
131. The Republican Party has a federal ruling against it involving voting in which they were not do certain things again and guess what? They never stopped doing them and no matter how many people pointed this out nobody did a thing to enforce that federal ruling. Not in 2004 or in 2008. The Party has no plan to ever obey that ruling or so I was told. 132. The Republican Party is hoping to nominate Arnold Swarzeneggar to its ticket in 2012 and/or 2016. They have been promoting this idea all over. You know, first you agree to seat a foreigner who doesn’t sound like one and then you can seat one that does sound like one and when we complain? They will cry: If Obama sat why can’t Arnold sit? It’s a violation of EP&DP to discriminate against people from Austria but not those subject to the British Crown. Arnold Swarzeneggar will not sit in that office before I do, and then he’ll never sit in that office ever, and Obama should not have. 133. The Republican Party is now placing unqualified people on its ticket; they know these people are unqualified thus what they are doing is treason as they are overthrowing the office of the executive, but they do it regardless. And at the expense of women, blacks and American Indians. WAR VETERAN is not a reason to commit a crime; nor is it a reason to violate our rights. I have a few choice words for John McCain as I too am a war veteran and I too was a prisoner of war - we can compare scars – and I too was tortured – I can describe intimately what torture is and does and what it feels like when you get to that point where you’re gonna break or you’re gonna survive. I too had to make a choice: Do I cut and run or remain a prisoner? For at least ten years? It would be ten years at the least. I remained. McCain said he did it as it wouldn’t be fair to the other prisoners. I did it as I would not be able to live with myself afterwards and as nothing would change my children would be injured as adults; I did it as if I’m the only hope these people have – if I don’t do this it will never be done and these people and this nation will die – then: I have no other choice. I have never once used WAR VETERAN as a reason for anything let alone an excuse. I know: I’m not above the law. I’m like everyone else as we all have one vote. Susan Versus John McCain? McCain is never gonna be my equal when it comes to moral authority.
134. The Republican Party has manipulated and controlled the system and hogged the ballot for more than a hundred years. It’s time for it to step aside. What happens? That’s up to the People who are the Party. I would like to see some of the Republican and Democratic Party leaders in jail but it’s not up to me; it’s up to the people who are the party and to The People, the constitutionally set government. Republicans can volunteer to jettison the leaders who did this, to begin obeying the law, to not assume one of the top two slots on all 50 ballots for the next few elections and work to fix how we even manage campaigns as there’s a problem and a big one with PACS and I have the case as I am the case, or they can volunteer to cease to exist. 135. The Democrats: The Democratic Party is a vile animal these days. If Kerry were not enough they gave us Bill Clinton too. Do they HATE Americans or what? The Democrats told us: We will elect anybody at all, even crooks and foreigners, as long as we do not elect someone we actually victimized. You can appear to be black, you just can’t actually be black. The Parties have both been engaging in propaganda and conditioning tactics. I don’t know who’s worse. Like this: A person who is black tells me Obama is one of us and will help us. One of us? Yeah, you know – a victim. Victim? Obama’s mother is white; she and her family were not victims of slavery. Obama’s father is Kenyan. He and his family were not victims of slavery. Obama claims to have suffered from discrimination. Nope, as look – he doesn’t even qualify and he made it into the office. If it were discrimination he suffered from then he wouldn’t be sitting. But you know how I know he is lying when he says he is a victim? He looks like the majority population of Hawaii. Most Hawaiians are not white as Hawaii has an indigenous population. He also grew up in Indonesia; he looks like the majority population of Indonesia. He doesn’t really look different thus he was not treated differently as in black versus white. This man is no victim; he only needs you to believe he is. Listen to how careful this constitutional lawyer is: you do realize he was careful to say My wife’s family is related to slaves and were slaves as if by being married to her he is then a victim too? When I point this out to people they are stunned. They are not hearing it. And then the things they do hear: Everyone can name Hawaii. So nobody stops to reason what the Hawaiians who are Native look like? Yes as they are absoluting everything to death instead of connecting it. Discrimination causes a physical injury; it 87
actually affects your brain. It causes your brain to sort of cross wires as it’s about annihilation of self. You confuse id with ego; you lose the human ability to feel liberty as an emotion and physical sensation. It truly does dumb you down. Nobody is hearing the truth due to the injury: Using words to make it seem as if, a thing lawyers do too well. Democrats took it to a new level as they used imagery too such as the “Office of the President Elect”, a make believe office with its own podium, own news conferences and own great seal. People truly believe it’s a named office. How severely have the people been injured? I found out: Incapacitation. Lawyers did it for politicians and then did it for businesses; it escalated and became the norm and went on for so long the people suffer a form of brainwashing named in the DSM. I can fix it, as I know how to heal this injury. But I’ll give you an example of what this injury does to a person: 136. I ask a person: “I believe John Kerry is unfit for command”. Is that a fact? The person hesitates and finally She: Yes, Kerry is unfit. Me: I know if Kerry is fit or unfit. I asked you about your belief not Kerry. You think there is a right or wrong answer, as if one is good or bad. You were hesitating as you were trying to figure out what answer I wanted you to say so instead you...answered a question I did not ask. I asked is this your belief? Is it a fact of you? So, somebody in your world has taught you that some beliefs are good and some are bad. Nope. They are. Now, did you even hear what I asked? Say that statement in your head like this: If you ask me that same thing I’d answer this way: I, Susan, believe Kerry is unfit. I do. Okay, YES, it is a fact – a fact of me; my fact is I do posses this belief. But you answered, “Yes, Kerry is unfit.” Can you answer my question the other way? Can you answer it ‘No, Kerry is not unfit’? You know what else? If I make that statement to you then ask you if it is a fact? You can’t answer it at all unless you ask me what my belief is! When this happens it is about self-awareness and sense of self. “I believe”: You don’t see quotes when a person speaks! 137. People “can’t believe” what they did. They’re stunned. And guess what? The Democrats exploited this very injury. How deep does this go? Deep as now it is everywhere. LAWYERS did it to America. So did speechwriters. People are hammered all day long with this, even on the news. Thus a person goes to a poll to vote and although they have been conditioned to vote for a certain candidate they don’t know it so they truly 88
believe they made a choice born of will and liberty when no, they are operating upon that conditioning on a subconscious level and then the carefully chosen words that serve to deliberately steer their choice so it is NOT their choice and is NOT voluntary. This is exactly how bad it is and how deep is it is: 138. A commercial now running says this: “Studies show 1 out of 4 women can misread a pregnancy test”. CAN? As in ability? 1 out of 4 women have the human ability to....make a mistake! Who reads a pregnancy test incorrectly on purpose? Who deliberately reads it incorrectly? Or by accident? Oops! I accidentally looked at my own pregnancy test! No, it is 1 out of 4 women have the human ability to make a mistake. Now, what studies? It says “Studies show”. Not even a recent study but a generic “studies”. You mean millions and billions of our tax dollars went into finding out if human beings can make mistakes? Is it possible humans make mistakes? And if possible do humans then act with deliberation to make mistakes? Well, I gotta tell this court: I know what “studies” these are; I know every one of them. Since the dawn of man we have tested, studied and determined mistakes. I can even name the very first scientific study regarding mistakes ever made: Eve made a mistake and we were off. Government was born! Ever since then we have thought about mistakes, considered mistakes and examined mistakes. Man debates and argues and promotes his mistakes in study after study. Man and mistakes: Our own Founders studied mistakes. They went all over the world studying them. They read about them, watched them and collected the details of them. They then designed the largest, grandest most important study ever conducted to answer this question: Can man govern himself, or, is he doomed to always and forever make a mistake from which he cannot recover? It took over 200 years for this study to be completed. In November of 2000 the study was finished. I was floored: Why, it seems the Founders never considered what if the conclusion of the experiment itself IS the mistake man never recovers from every time? What if nobody knows the study has been concluded??? Or nobody knows the mistake??? Time to review our mistakes! Is this the most perfect form of government on Earth? I am! I could have saved that drug company billions. As it is they might owe me billions. Notice they aren’t telling us that 1 out of 4 men make mistakes. It’s only women who have the human ability to make mistakes as if men can correctly read a pregnancy test 89
100% of the time and perfectly do everything 100% the time. Well, make no mistake: Every time I ask someone what that commercial is saying they tell me that 25% of the time pregnancy tests are wrong as in the test itself is defective but mostly, almost exclusively, I hear this: women can’t read them as they are confused. As in can’t understand directions. Not one person realizes he has just been told women can and do make mistakes 1 out of 4 times – if a pregnancy test is involved. What? Do women make a mistake 1 out of 4 times when breathing? Opening a can of soda? Hmmm, in all I do all day long am I, Susan, making a mistake 25 % of the time? Will the Creator tell me upon death: Susan, 25% of everything you ever did was a mistake. I’m not kidding: one woman said when she first heard it she thought dumb as in such a dumb woman would need to go back to school and men have told me that they do truly believe women are less than men – a SCOTUS clerk told me this and even said he did not believe the Constitution applied to women and some of that is because of crap like this as he does not even know he is absorbing it as fact and truth as it’s so subtle and feeds into the pre-existing injury - and when I asked men about this ad some did assume it was something women did like couldn’t read the test or the instructions; as if it was about how women are: DUMB. Dumb is a state of being for women; it is a fact of men that women are dumb. I understand directions perfectly; I follow them perfectly. Watch me perfectly follow the directions in the Federalist Papers and so sue this company for LYING to the public thus harming women as it implies and infers WOMEN ARE CREATED DEFECTIVE thus it is their unchangeable nature and uses brain washing to do it. It says one of us makes mistakes while three of us are perfect and that’s a lie, false advertising, as all women - 100% - CAN misread a pregnancy test so 1 out of 300 million Americans WILL sue: You did not say 4 out of 4 women can misread a pregnancy test and I know why: The jig is up if you said that, isn’t it? This drug company did not make a mistake. It acted with deliberation. 139. Exactly as everything these Parties did is deliberate. Don’t believe me? Joe Trippi of the Democratic Party, the guy who worked for Dean, wrote a book; it’s called “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. He told me to use the internet to steal this seat, to take private funds for the first time since 1976 to steal this seat, and to figure out a way to motivate the 47% of people who never vote to then vote if I wanted to win just for the sake of winning as it was about winning. He even told me that I should look for a 90
minority person, as these voters are mostly low income. This sounds like a plan. That somebody decided to follow to the letter: I saw a magazine cover that read (not exact): “How the kid who owns Facebook chose a President”. It was all about how the internet, namely Facebook, was used to seat Obama and that w/o Facebook no Obama. I, with my own ears, heard Obama say he was going to take private money for the first time since 1976. Then I saw the Democrats desperate and scared. I also saw the wealthy men who control them gleam as they knew: We finally managed to gain control of it all; all we gotta do is make it seem as if we are electing a black person when really we’re electing a foreigner as the only thing we can’t get past now is a victim...if an actual victim sits our goose is cooked so we can make it seem as if but we just can’t elect a person who was one of our victims. We can even nominate a woman who used to be a man but had a sex change operation as long as it isn’t one of our actual victims. And a black guy who isn’t would then motivate those 47% of the voters we’ve never been able to motivate...you know they’ll vote for us thus making it seem as if he’s way more popular than he actually is. Nobody will ever realize the actual numbers tell a different story and who will ever check the actual facts? We can do this! Now, did I or did I not hear that this election brought out more voters than any election we could remember? None of this is mistake. Now, did the Democratic Party leader Harry Reid say they might be able to get a light skinned black who did not sound black then elected? It’s all history that you deny. See the people who are black decry this but also embrace it as it proves racism is still alive and well. I attached Jasmyne Cannick. 140. Even if we assume everything Barack Obama ever said or did his whole entire life is a fact it is also a fact that he signed 511. He unqualified himself then. But not one Party member noticed? Not any members of the Democratic Party knew of that document? At least two signed it. No Republicans knew of it? So what did they do? Did both parties collude? As it seems as if they had a silent agreement to remain silent when 511 was passed – approved by the Judiciary Committee – as nobody in either Party said a word. 141. The two major parties do not abide by their own party philosophy. If you look around you can’t discern any difference at all between the two but if you then compare how they act, what they create and how they vote 91
against their platforms you see they do not follow their own party ‘agenda’. This too is a way The People are being conditioned. A voter I know was shocked, he actually did not know, when he realized that these people have zero in common with their stated beliefs. He could not get over how very far from these stated beliefs the party members act and that Americans aren’t up in arms and fighting back. He truly believed his fellow citizens liked this, wanted this and were condoning and promoting this until he read those platforms. 142. The Libertarian Party: They have a plank calling or foreignization. Or they did when last I checked. That’s not free speech – it’s a crime known as treason as you’re organizing and collecting money to then overthrow the Executive thus overthrow The People. 143. I’d keep going as I have lists and lists of things each party has done but it’s not necessary as I’m not here to make a case as it is already made and won. I’m here to enforce my judgment thus what I need is to be able to teach the people what they need to know to heal the injury and to protect themselves from these nasty tactics in the future. I also need these two parties to admit to everything they did and the Libertarian Party to remove the foreignization plank if they still have it. As they’re so good at raising so much money? They can offer me some. And big business had better not get any ideas as they need me; this is gonna go one way or the other and so their only question should be “Do we want to survive as a company?” as if you do then I am your only hope. Without me? You do not have that hope as I’m the only person alive with the solutions as only I can hit China up with a bigger fear than they named. Only I can exert power and authority over the likes of China and then the other nations, as only I know exactly what to use and how to use it. China wants to call in that debt the parties created and/or seize US interests? China said it’d nuke us; China said it would bomb us. Too bad for China as that threat is empty and I know it so all I have to do is tell planet Earth by giving it the science. The royal families of Europe told me that they would NEVER give up the money they make off of the backs of their American serf/slaves without their consent and against their will. Too bad for royalty everywhere then as all I have to do is deal with one, Queen Elizabeth: You don’t want to see it any way but my way as you made a mistake or you made the greatest, most important decision of your life as you gave your subjects the right to 92
dissolve you when you agreed to pay income tax. I took the liberty of informing them in SCOTUS Petition 07-9804, In Re Susan, as Gordon Brown is not my cup of tea and he refuses to hold a vote; I informed them that all they have to do is order you to remove Brown via orderign him to hold a vote so they can and will vote in a person who understands what an honor bond is; that Brown has no choice but to obey your order as the Queen defends her subjects – The British People - not any office or title. Given a choice between Parliament and the Queen? If it means the British people have actual power and authority thus control over their destiny and fate and that the monarchy is no longer a meaningless, empty, vacuous, luxury hog with too much time on their hands and too little to do then I know as fact without question exactly who the British people will choose: Queen Elizabeth as she, not Gordon Brown, secured the right of dissolution for them. The rest of European royalty had better start looking for jobs or merely agree to see it my way thus act for the people they now lord over. Nobody, no nation on Earth or even all of Earth acting as one, has more moral authority than the US so businesses and the lawyers they hire can try it as can the uberwealthy and so can another nation but they will lose each and every time as they cannot defeat what Susan owns: The truth. My greatest concern? 144. I witnessed the Democrats do something I thought I’d never, ever see. I mean never: Traditionally it has been very difficult to get American Indians to agree to harm themselves. Traditionally they fight wars over this very idea, as they do not surrender to what is unconstitutional. Traditionally their war cry is they'd rather be dead than be injured by their own hand - I live in the home of the Seminole, the Unconquered People, as the entire federal government with the US military couldn't defeat them - and I’m Native American so I have no idea what Obama offered them that is so damn attractive other than that false appearance and that is it: they have no idea they were told a lie and that they are victimizing their own persons, that what the Europeans couldn’t do to them in over 400 years and then the entire federal government and US military couldn't do to them in over 200 of those years the Democratic Party did in only a few months: They gave up their traditions, their true beliefs about constitutional authority.
145. As long as a natural born American sits American Indians have the hope that they can ascend to this office someday as currently they do not qualify. If criminals and foreigners sit? There is no hope for any American Indian. No foreign power has any interest in the American Indian and criminals by their very nature have no interest in the ethical. They will, as question without fact, become extinct. [I love this Freudian slip; I’m keeping it.] It has to do with dual citizenship and numbers, as we almost did exterminate them and they realize the effects of discrimination distinctly, like persons who are black but in a distinct manner as we prevented them from practicing their religion while blacks were able to practice it. For all the advantages American Indians had over blacks that were brought here in chains they suffer worse and the attrition rate is higher. It’s not only a compounding of effects but of never having been able to achieve in any actual manner that then caused truly effective change. They never had a Thurgood Marshall and they may be dead before that ever happens if the injury is not addressed. You harm all children when you harm their mothers and it is from your mother that you get your will, your ideas of spirituality and right and wrong. If you harm mothers in such a way they can’t teach their children and then compound that with outlawing religious expression so the entire group is existing on sheer will alone you rip a hole in the group so wide and deep it is nearly impossible to survive, as you can’t replace the people you are losing. You not only lose the physical bodies but you lose the knowledge, the traditions regarding how to do things the old way and the sacred traditions. It’s as if an always fatal disease is ever present among you so you constantly teeter on the brink. All that kept American Indians from succumbing up to now was constitutional authority. Constitutional authority allows American Indians to defy the federal government. That kind of will is inviolate; I know as I have it. Man cannot survive on will alone but if it’s constitutional authority he can survive long enough then get to a place whereby he can thrive. If all American Indians had was that ego based will that is decidedly European in nature they never, ever would have made it this long. It is the will born of id, the same will our Founders had, that kept them going through it all. And for the first time ever they are giving it away; they are being broken and do not know it. I, Susan, know as fact w/o question that if this is not addressed American Indians will not survive as an ethnic group and most likely will not survive at all as American Indians have not been able to access any of our institutions. I do not mean government institutions only but all institutions across the board. They have never been able to recover to a point whereby they could begin thriving again. Constitutional authority is their only natural resource and they can’t lose it before they are 94
accorded justice or they will not make it. So I know, I absolutely know that If somebody does not stop the Democratic Party and restore constitutional authority to the American Indians the political parties are going to slaughter the American Indians once and for all. 146. I, Susan, have a better idea than any of the political parties: The American Indians told me they needed justice and that meant the land. Specifically the Ft. Laramie land. I did not ask if they would accept something else. As no person ever revisited the issue on their behalf I did. I, Susan, can and may return that land but my plan involves American Indians becoming full citizens by choice, upon their own will and liberty without any force or coercion. They can accept or reject my plan with zero consequences imposed on them by the US. The use of the land patent gives American Indians the land back while preserving it for all Americans and still allows them to live as a group, collectively. I can and will legally argue a land patent that is royal in charter – the rarest of all - plus something else: I can and will argue one that is divine in charter. The treaty I entered covers a part of FL, Spanish granted by royal charter. Who gave the Spanish king the right to seize land in the new world? This royal charter is derived from one granted by the Pope. As I’m catholic I then pursued this papal claim all the way back to Jesus and then even earlier, to Abraham and before. I can legally document it to the earliest Christian church due to the Vatican records; I can then use sacred works that all match to legally prove it then goes back to Adam and Eve. That’s legal. The law has evolved from what began as divine not secular law; our legal roots are to be found within salvation history, the history of the metaphysical or of who and what you are as a people. Later they became secular codes most notably when Mohammed introduced Islam and most recently when we introduced the Declaration naming rights granted by God, rights that are inalienable as they came into being with this universe. Scientifically I can reason it all the way back to the void as I resolved Uniformity. I know the design of the universe and how it all works. I know the smallest particle. I can prove everything I claim. I’m not presenting anything like “We will find the Higgs particle when we turn the collider on; it should exist”. No it doesn’t. It is not that as I already found it. I can reason this fully so that anybody can understand it. I can even bring a simple experiment to court so that the court can then see for itself. This answer was much simpler than anyone imagined. The problem arguing science in a court of law? There isn’t a problem if you know there is a legal burden of proof standard that is not the same as the scientific burden of proof standard. Lawyers do not know what 95
to ask for and scientists would never use what a lawyer does so they have been entering the incorrect proof. Science has it but lawyers never asked; when a lawyer asks a scientist for proof? A scientist is thinking controls, laboratories and numbers. A court of law does accept that at times such as a court will accept DNA. DNA may prove paternity while it would not prove evolution. Blood may be entered as proof of a person having worn a shirt when he was shot and killed, a bloody shirt, but it’s not proof until or unless the person who shot him says “He was wearing that exact shirt when I shot him.” But blood alone would never prove murder. I know what a court needs; I know what court of law needs, a court of science needs and even the Vatican court needs. It’s not the same. As I can do this American Indians would have a land patent both royal and divine, a land patent so inviolate all that can break it is the extinction of American Indians, as I can argue it back to the beginning of the universe but in doing so then also prove the Creator is reality and did create the universe and then the multiverse. I can and will prove mankind truly did receive sovereignty over Earth from that Creator and this then would give everyone what they needed and also give American Indians security as land patents have never been ruled against by SCOTUS - they do not break less strict ones; it has never happened and only the College of William and Mary has a royal one or so I was told – plus it then makes American Indians a part of the electorate as our Founders named land owners as the electorate and we are not ready to jettison that yet or so it seems. American Indians would not only vote but elect the President thus making up for the disparity they suffer. This is not only possible it is easily doable; it can happen any time this nation wants to make it happen. It was not and is not impossible; all any person had to be was motivated so they wouldn’t quit; all any person had to do was vow to succeed or die trying and be willing to look at the problem any and all ways whether they personally liked it or not. All any person had to do was accept it as fact: It’s the land or nothing and these people have no reason to trust you so you can’t settle for what everybody else has; you can’t offer them a solution that can then be violated by persons with everything already. To that end I borrowed my idea from the Sioux: If a white man in 2009 gets a land patent, a regular old land patent, or has no land patent but owns property, then secure for the ‘least’ privileged group the strictest, securest land patent of all. The white man then has a vested interest in the Indian as that Indian is going to vote for the President and that Indian will be here forever and ever as land patents do not expire when you die but pass on to your heirs in perpetuity. The Indian has a vested interest in the white man as his land is not so secure and the Indian can never afford to have this government fall no matter 96
what or else he will lose his inviolate patent to criminals and foreigners. Both then not only have the same interests but power and authority is leveraged in such a way each needs the other. [This is about allodial title, actual allodial title. It’s possible but Indians should know: It’s very, very strict so perfect if you meant it when you said you needed the land returned as it is sacred but horrible if you meant to build a resort: If you make any improvements it is no longer allodial. I have considered the changes since the Ft. Laramie Treaty was broken such as newer homes and even whole towns. Trust me: There’s a solution.] 147. Do not worry: I have answers for black citizens – any and all minorities - and for women and lots of them. You drove me too as I was never so livid as when I heard the political parties say they couldn’t find one able, capable, qualified black person who is a victim of slavery – the effects of which are still ongoing – in all of the United States. Not one. You’re all as unable and as stupid as women are. They had zero qualified candidates as they looked and looked and couldn’t find a single one. So desperate to find qualified blacks and qualified women were they that they passed resolutions and made phony law to help us: they empowered and qualified war veterans born overseas and halfAmericans. I said, “No – what you can’t have is one of two things: A person you harmed who means to get revenge or a person you harmed who means to end injustice once and for all, as that then is no more unjust privilege for you.” They are afraid; they are cowards. What they need to be is ashamed and remorseful but I’m not waiting around for that to happen. I made sure I did not enter until I could argue for everyone even if surprised at the last second. I had to be able to do it cold, with no notes, no books, no help – nothing but my own person. That took a while. It only became possible in 2006. I made certain I could bring everyone with me when I entered the bar so when we begin again in 2012 with the vote we all begin together, not all with the same wealth and same amount of material goods but with the same opportunity. If I can achieve with nothing but my brain then you can too, you have no excuse, but most of you have some resources and you have something I did not: Me today with all of the answers as when I began this I had only me without any of the answers. And you have brand new proof: Barack Obama proved that people who are white will vote for a person who is black. A large number of persons who are white voted for Obama. No person has to worry that I wasn’t considering you as I considered all of you, even white men: I’m a hardliner: Equal protection and due process is an inviolate law of this universe. It’s how you perfect the practice of unconditional love otherwise known as the Declaration and the Constitution. 97
148. Gay Americans: You are being used by politicians and go along with it. You have named your price: A piece of paper. A marriage license therefore like women you are used: One politician gives it to you another takes it away. As long as you name that piece of paper as the price and your proof? You’re political as I believe your testimony: If you say you’re gay from birth then you are. But guess what? That then is a term. So, whatever made you come to believe you would have kids or serve in the military? You won’t. It’s not because you’re unequal but because you are equal –you get one vote. So go vote on it: Do two men or two women ever produce human babies? You can vote yes but it won’t happen. A marriage license? You do not need one as marriage licenses are only for protecting any possible children and for protecting women as a woman risks her life every time she has sex with a man as she might get a disease or die from complications of pregnancy plus women never had any legal power. You do not need a marriage license as just because science says you can does not mean you should: We all made a mistake. You want class status? You got it: you’re a class. It’s of no help as what you really want is to do anything at all without any consequences. If you’re gay and from birth then no kids is a term and until you live that out, live out what you say you truly believe, then we have no proof of life and you’re not my equal as you’re asking me to make exceptions for you. I have answers for you and there is way you can serve your nation but to actually be able to invoke moral authority? You must live out the terms thus not negotiate your safety: No kids, no military and no marriage license. It’s already built into the Constitution and you aren’t gonna find any gay gene as sex acts are always a choice and even with rape the man chose to rape the woman. Sex is not sexuality. Until you live out what you say you are and what you say you believe, nobody has proof and they will always and forever be able to manipulate and control you. Now, if you KNOW AS FACT from birth that you are gay? What’s all this waffling over children? No person has any business buying and selling people not only people who are gay. I can fully reason this for you. I myself have first hand experience as a person in my life is gay and as I, my own self, do not have a valid marriage license as I never needed one – NY did so I went out and got a fake one. The relationship is real, the paper is not. It’s signed, it’s sealed and it is on file but guess what? I gave false information as I refused to reduce myself to a piece of paper only as NY State, a criminal state, wanted me to as if a paper made me human. If another state asked me for an actual valid reason I might get a real one but not if NY asks me. No paper is ever gonna prove your equal and it will never convince another person you are. I will 98
make my case to you as when you hear all of my reasoning and I answer your questions you’ll get it. And if you do reason and decide to live it out thus secure proof of life? Any time a person tries to injure you all you have to do is pull rank and say: Nope, as I’m willing to volunteer and am. I do not need anything you have as I already have the only pieces of paper I’m ever gonna need.” That’s moral authority, the righteous thing for the righteous reason, a just cause, as it has zero to do with mores or personal beliefs. So – poof! You’re a protected class. No gay rights as there are no women’s rights but only human rights. Sorry PETA: We protect humans. Humans possess emotional reasoning capacity which is why this will be emotional: As you do not own the emotional truth of “gay”. You only own a part of it. You need the whole truth or you are negotiating your safety, as you can’t defend yourself without every fact, the whole truth. Therefore like men and women are both human but biology makes them distinct so does your class status – you’re distinct as the possibility of children by natural means is not possible. Are we going to argue if natural birth means naturally conceived? Yes and no as all third party contracts are invalid and unconstitutional as a contract exists between two parties. Plus: once you lose control of the biological material? You lose control of the child so you can never, ever guarantee its safety and no sperm injecting doctor is ever going to protect that baby and he or she might even give that baby to monsters just for the money these days. Nobody should be selling eggs and sperm and no woman should be paid to risk her life having a child for someone else just as we do not allow one man to take another’s place in war. You can’t even volunteer to take another man’s place in war. If you can’t take a man’s place then you can’t take a woman’s place when it comes to possibly losing your life, at least not in birth or war. There’s also a scientific reason; I have all of the actual reasons – not lies, not excuses, not what I personally like and not what is popular. Now deal with it and discover your actual humanity and all of your actual reasons as that’s what the protection of the Declaration and Constitution will give you: The truth of you not me. You’ll also know the truth of whether or not politicians or even entire political parties ever meant a single they ever said to you as you seem to be as gullible as women as no matter how many times they do it to you – you keep falling for it. Political parties do it, private business does it and individuals do it and you come to believe it with zero evidence and zero proof and when all the evidence and proof we do have goes against it. Are you ready? IT IS PARTLY AN EMOTIONAL PROBLEM. You deny this. You think people want to cure you. Well, some do as if they cure gay they then cure you. I’m not so silly: Gay isn’t a disease. It MIGHT be a quality of being human. It MIGHT be your choice. I 99
already know the answer; you don’t and The People don’t as none of you have made the case either way. The federal bench doesn’t know as not one ruling named it correctly. Everybody but me needs to know or we will be engaged in what is ideological warfare forever, over gay and over woman. I have no political agenda and no private interests like money to be made. I could care less who or what you have sex with as long as it isn’t children or against another’s will, as all I’m out to cure is the actual disease you have: you’re failure to thrive thus liberate yourself when nothing was ever actually in your way and when some of you had every advantage in this world. 149. From “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”: 631 rich white men forced Bush on us. “No Democrat running for president had ever opted out of Public campaign financing. The way our labyrinthine campaign finance laws have worked since 1976 a candidate can get matching funds if he raises a certain amount of money but then he is restricted from spending more than that amount in any given state. So while matching funds can double a poorly funded candidate's base, taking the matching money means the candidate can't go over the cap. But Republicans have proven so adept at raising those $1,000 and $2,000 checks from the wealthiest Americans (who benefit most from high-end tax cuts and pro-business policies) they can raise two, three, four times the cap, while Democrats (relying on much smaller donations from its middle-class, working constituency) haven't been able to afford to forego the matching funds... In the 2000 election, Al Gore raised more money than any Democrat in history, $49 million. But George W . Bush raised $125 million. Al Gore was the vice president of the United States, a brilliant, respected career public servant. And yet somehow a weak governor with five years of political experience and the oratorical ability of a six-year-old was able to raise two-and-a-half times as much money? How was that possible? In 2000, almost half of Bush's money came from 59,279 donations of $1,000 (the maximum limit for donations in 2000), more than three times as many big donations as any candidate had ever received. As Charles Lewis, executive director for the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity wrote, "A contribution check of $ 1000 isn't something the average American can write; most often, those who open their checkbooks are lawyers, lobbyists, or the vested economic interests they represent who want something in return 100
from the government." In effect, sixty thousand rich white guys determined who would be president for the rest of us three hundred million people. And this is not an aberration. Each year, the richest one quarter of 1 percent of Americans make 80 percent of all individual political donations. And corporations, the Republicans' primary source of funding, outspend labor, the Democrats' chief supporters, 10 to 1.5 Given the disparity in their funding, it's surprising Gore did as well as he did, winning the popular vote and only losing the election because of Florida's nostalgic return to Jim Crow-style electioneering' and the political intercession of five Supreme Court Justices. In the fall of 2003, inside the Dean campaign, we realized for the first time that we actually had a shot at winning the nomination, and we began turning our attention to the Bush money machine-which had, if anything, become even more formidable than in 2000. The secret to Bush's fund raising is bundling, finding those corporate donors who can hit up their employees and country club friends for $1,000 and $2,000 checks. The Bush team calls people who could bring in $100,000 Pioneers. Donors who bring in $200,000 in bundled checks are called Rangers. According to an investigative project by the Washington Post, between 1998 and May of 2003, Bush raised $296.3 million and "at least a third of the total - many sources believe more than half - was raised by 631 people." The king of these billionaire bundlers, until his company collapsed, leaving investors and employees high and dry, was Kenneth Lay, head of Enron ("Kenny Boy," as Bush called him) who brought in almost $600,000 for his old friend. As Lewis writes in The Buying of the President 2004, the key component of the "Pioneer System" is its nearly obsessive focus on making sure bundlers get "credit" for their fund-raising work. Now why would they want to receive credit? Clearly, many donors wanted firstin-line access to and influence with the prospective new administration. What is unusual about the Pioneer system is the unabashed directness of the transaction: You help us and we'll credit you and remember your loyalty and support later. So what do the Kenny Boy Lays of the world get for their money? According to the Washington Post's investigation, two of the five people on the Federal Energy Regulatory Committee were recommended by Lay. So in effect for his $600,000 he got to chose 40% of the government agency that would 101
regulate his industry...of the 240 fund raisers identified by the Post about 40% ended up in job appointments, 23 were named as ambassadors and three to the cabinet. More important is access as more than half of the [Bush] Pioneers are heads of companies.” – Joe Trippi Notice women aren’t buying offices and/or buying an appointment to them. That list of female CEOS? “Ellen Kullman replaced Chad Holliday at DuPont Thursday to start 2009, which brings to 13 the number of female CEOs running the USA's largest 500 publicly traded companies. That's a record. But it's only one more than last year, a year when Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sarah Palin missed becoming the first female president and vice president, and a year when frustration continued to mount on the corporate side over the plodding progress of women.” By Del Jones, USA TODAY It’s not coincidental as there are no coincidences; it’s proof as gay men have a better chance of becoming elected than women do: In 2009 there are only 17 female Senators. In all of US history there have been only 38. 13 were appointed with 7 appointed to succeed their dead husbands. 150. The Federal Judiciary’s attempts to keep me out and so any and all living People out then as I represent them constitutes a pattern. So we can and will hear international custody cases and hear terrorist but not American women, natural born women if they argue authority? What if that woman must argue authority to then make her case and the People’s case as three states violated the FEDERAL US CONSTITUTION to avoid according her justice thus avoid according all women justice? Please do not insult us any further by naming appearances like the number of pages or type face. Do not deny history either as we all know only lawyers or people trained in the law formally have been allowed entry to SCOTUS. If protecting Obama, a lawyer, is not upholding that unconstitutionally and is not defending dead paper and is not a massive conflict of interests on the Federal Judiciary’s part then what is it? Paul Zoss can read: the SG waived all of his interest and his right as a citizen on 1/01/08 and as an officer on 11/05/08. Excuse me but wasn’t Obama a sitting officer then? Nobody but nobody is acting under the authority of the US as of Bush V Gore (it counts if only I know but now millions of people know) or as of Obama’s installation as everyone knew he signed 511 thus violated the rights of all natural born citizens and targeting women as for anyone to posses the authority of the US you must accord The People informed consent and you, the candidate, must not be foreign.
151. It is a sin to deliberately starve living People. I caught a federal judge changing a complaint within his ruling and order to then justify his decision when there was no justification. His application is wrong and in my opinion criminal due to him changing the complaint and due to what he then said. He said: As SCOTUS has not stopped me as it has not ruled you are a class and as it will not stop me as I won’t let you appear in person then I can starve you and so I will. He said he would literally starve a human being by denying him food via food stamps as this man was denied food stamps by FL for only being gay. BUT: This man never filed as a class so the judge was not denying him for gay as if gay is a class. This was personal as the complaint never said “I’m gay; it’s the class known as gay FL is harming”. Gay wasn’t the point of law until the judge made it the point but even if it was? Can you starve a human only for being gay? When I confronted this judge in a complaint and attached his own ruling plus legal commentary made by others who read this ruling but did not know this judge changed complaints within his ruling on a routine basis as it happened to me? A judge ordered a clerk to pull my complaint from the files. So, it seems the federal bench can and will starve human beings for being gay and being women once again reasoning we have rights only in death, or, after we are actually dead. In my case? The federal bench now tries to starve me the only other way you can starve a human being, by denying me liberty and justice, denying me unconditional love, as that too is starvation as if you deny a person justice then you starve them to death. They will never, ever thrive. They will never, ever strive. It slowly kills the whole society. Harm women this way and at some point no more healthy babies. We passed that point as Bush V gore is the conclusion of the Founders experiment and we flunked as the only way to pass? Let me appear in person to then defend The People. This nation never, ever accorded women any actual legal power so the experiment failed unless that woman is now here. The Founders planned for this. They told us to start shooting if that woman made it into SCOTUS and out again and now LOWER federal judges not Justices a d not The People who are not qualified to adjudicate the case keep saying they are, that we can and will starve you. Nope as we’ll kill you first if that’s your verdict. ONLY The People and/or the Justices are qualified to opine in this case. And the Justices are subject to the authority of The People. All this court can and may do is hear the case in person thereby informing the People. The People will listen to my side and listen to Obama’s side, we can and will talk to The People thus informing them, and then the People choose not any judge as judges do not get two votes and The People never got so much as one if they were not informed. I defend the People thus defend any judge who is one of The 103
People. Judges like Zoss need to get off the high horse they have been riding upon as the case for equality means we all get one vote NOT federal judges can and may violate our rights at their whim and will. He’s NOT a federal judge now that the officers defaulted but a person with one vote – exactly like me. Zoss’ most disgusting act against me, all women and The People? Allowing noncauses to enter while he keeps out actual causes, or, allowing noncases w/o legal standing to proceed while he keeps out good cases with legal standing. Just like BVG. I’m a woman, a member of the injured class and I belong to no political party nor ever have. So what keeps e out? Zoss’ pen, that’s what and his rotten intention and motivations, that’s what as they aren’t honest and they aren’t constitutional: 152. Zoss ignored the fact that NY State allowed the third parties involved, the Austin’s, who received my children after they had been illegally and in violation of the law removed from PA so they were and are in violation of the UCCCJ, and who were paid to participate in their kidnapping and the human trafficking of my person in the form of a $1 house (Zoss read the deed I attached) to then return to NY after NY first remanded jurisdiction to PA and to act against me by wholly making up a cause of action as they had none! That is, NY allowed them to enter what is not an actual cause of action in any state whatsoever to then file for third party custody as what the Austin’s, Quninoes’ and Herbert’s – violent family members - wanted from day one was termination of my rights w/o actually terminating them as they knew they couldn’t do it and they sought to use my kids as pawns, to keep me from pursuing justice. What Zoss says never happened on the most fundamental level of all, family court: 153. The Austin’s “won” custody based upon this false claim: “We need insurance thus want the kids permanently.” I entered the arguments made. The Austin’s actually entered this - INSURANCE – as their cause to then take third party PERMANENT custody of my kids when really it was nothing more than an attack against me. Thus here is most of the complaint filed against the third parties: As SCOTUS petitions 07-9804, 08-6622 and 09-6777 state and as the complaints now before this court state (See Herbert V Obama) the counties in several states victimized me and even committed crimes against me.
154. Rennselaer county NY and so agents of the county lied under oath, manipulated facts, manufactured facts, ignored the law, violated the law, tampered with evidence and with proof, manipulated the system, acted upon unconstitutional policy and even perjured themselves under oath to then make the awarding of the custody of my children and the injury my person suffered at their hands seem to be legal and justified. Some of these officials went so far as to abuse my children with full knowing and deliberation. Others were caught in the act of violating their mandates and their licenses and at least one agent, Leslie Ortiz, a lawyer and my children's guardian ad litum abused my children by pretending she did not understand them when they told her they had been kidnapped and that they wanted to live with me, their real mother, and which she then failed to report to any person and even denied in her written assessment as if my children never told her, and who engaged in a relationship outside of the court with the persons who injured us as she was at the time and might still be a neighbor of the third parties. I myself caught her in the act, as she was caught in very close, intimate conversation with Cate Austin in the bathroom of the Rennselaer County courthouse during a break in the proceedings. 155. Another agent, a social worker, failed to report abuse she witnessed and later a master for the state lied under oath as they claimed that no such report existed against David Austin when it did and when someone had blacked out the name of the reporter - me. The social worker, Allanna McMillan, acting in conjunction with the Austin's and one Randy Cale, a person hired solely to manufacture evidence against me and in favor of the Austin's and who is known to be a “court whore”, COUNTY EMPLOYEES INCLUDING GRIFFIN’S OWN CLERK TOLD ME AND MY ATTORNEY THIS EXACTLY and who testified to the impossible upon the witness stand and who reported that he knew the real reason Cate Austin had brought my children to him was so that he would then generate a report against me, he actually said it was about blame when he testified, then concocted a report against me and based her false finding upon: Stories told about me from a time before my children were even born. She interviewed out of state nonwitnesses and never spoke to me; 105
this incredulous report and subsequent finding was dismissed by NY but it was during this fair hearing that the master for the state perjured himself and that the report against David Austin was blacked out and then unbelievably entered against me! As if it was a report I generated against my own self! My lawyer smelled a rat so she said if the state was insisting that the reports used to find me were the same report and not separate, different reports as NY claimed as they did not match so NY's claim made no sense then NY would have no objection to her entering BOTH reports to then prove the report that I abused my children was falsified by McMillan and that it only came to be as the Austin's sought revenge. Trapped by their own lies NY agreed and then later admitted McMillan had zero grounds to ever find me guilty of abuse. The state and county never did take action against the actual abuser, David Austin, nor did it ever admit to its perjury or to its tampering of the evidence. No action was ever taken against any of the involved people who to this day are allowed to harm women and children with immunity. See Austin V Herbert, a legally enforced kidnapping perpetrated by the county of Rennselaer and the state of NY which is partly the result of favor and partisan politics. Details of these acts are found within the lower federal court and within SCOTUS petitions 079804, 08-6622 and 09-6777. They are too numerous to name here; literally I can name hundreds of acts and all of them are egregious. I submitted the entire paper trail proving all of my claims to the federal courthouse in Jacksonville FL. NY never had the legal right to hear this case; in fact like BVG there was no actual case to be had but the county allowed the Austin's to manufacture one by first making up a fantasy cause of action: The petition the Austin's submitted in the spring of 2001 stated that the Austin's were seeking third party custody of my children and my person as they needed MEDICAL INSURANCE. MEDICAL INSURANCE IS NOT AN ACTUAL CAUSE OF ACTION IN THE CASE OF THE CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN ANY STATE. IT IS OFFENSIVE TO EVERYONE OF MY SENSIBILITIES THAT NY AND THIS COUNTY ALLOWED THIRD PARTIES ENTRY AND HEARD THIS CLAIM AND THEN HORRIFICALLY LET THE AUSTIN'S CHANGE THE CLAIM GRADUALLY OVER THE COURSE OF 4 YEARS UNTIL IT WAS UNRECOGNIZABLE. LITERALLY NY AND THIS COUNTY AND SO ALL OF THE AGENTS STATE AND COUNTY BECAME OUR ABUSER AND 106
THE PERPETRATORS FOR W/O THEM? THERE WAS NO CASE! INSURANCE IS NOT A CAUSE TO TAKE CHILDREN FROM THE MOTHER PLUS THE AUSTINS NEVER DENIED THAT THE CHILDREN ONLY CAME TO BE WITH THEM AS THEY PARTICIPATED IN A KIDNAPPING. 156. Thus there is zero excuse for the County of Rennselaer. I asked over and over WHY Randy Cale was allowed to enter the County courthouse if it was common knowledge he was being paid to abuse children and I never received an answer other than that “judges know to ignore him” and “judges do not listen to anything he says”. The real, actual reason is much more sinister: County employees know Cale to be a hired gun, a “court whore” but as parents might not? A judge uses him exactly like the lawyer Finkle did as did the Austin’s to then force a ruling that goes against all acceptable evidence and proof. In my case his testimony was upheld as sterling by Griffin when it was her own court clerk who said Griffin would never do this as she knew all about Cale. Griffin then rejects Cale’s testimony when it benefits her agenda and uses it when it benefits her agenda- as all judges do. Most telling? If you bother to read Cale’s report he assigns blame to my person; he says my children seemed opt be angry and says it is anger at me when my kids NEVER said that. He uses words to make it seem as if and when he knows he can’t testify to anything about me unless he meets me in person. I not only proved Cale perjured himself by testifying to the impossible but that he tampered with his own records in order to hide what my kids did tell him and to hide the fact that he abused them in his office. When I told my attorney three years after the fact? She was stunned. Guess what? It has to do with the difference between absolute and whole numbers – again like BVG as the injury is endemic or from the lone citizen up to the office of President - and so only an extremely observant person who knows her math inside out as well as is an expert in human behavior would ever have discovered this, that is, I knew Cale had done what my children reported to me and what I myself heard him admit from upon the witness stand but when my attorney asked me to prove it as if she had never been in the room to hear his testimony she was blown away when I told her HOW it was very easy to prove as it never occurred to her. Thus Rennselaer and counties all 107
across this nation have no excuse and no reason for what they have done as I have encountered this courtroom nonsense in over 5 states. It’s proof that men have no protected right of custody of children and that giving it to them as a right then violates the original separation of powers known as biology thus causing women and children to be sold and humanly trafficked across state lines and by county and state authorities. SCOTUS created a situation whereby the abuse and battery of women is inescapable as men are allowed to use the courts to do it. Lawyers know this but refuse to bring the case as it means less money for them. MONEY was always the reason lawyers cited when refusing to act and/or to represent me. ALL counties in the US have discriminatory and unjust policies that harm women and their children as they justify their actions by citing SCOTUS rulings decided in error and even wrongly; to justify the injury they deny reality and ignore all fact and law. 157. Philadelphia county had unjust policy targeting women - to ignore all claims of domestic violence but in Philadelphia it was taken a step further: My children and my person were placed in protective custody. While in protective custody our named batterers then petitioned the court to gain custody of the children and so stop me from criminally prosecuting them as the children were used as threat against me as in "if you prosecute us you’ll never see them again". Our named batterers were not only allowed to petition the court but were also allowed to manipulate the docket by being heard first - to prevent me from appearing as they were concerned I'd find out they had entered a petition and so appear. They and their attorney perjured themselves and even though they were named as our batterers they were given my children; my children were removed from protective custody and handed over to the very people named as those we needed to be protected from! Upon direct confrontation I was told Philadelphia County had a policy to award children to any related person even the named batterers as it then saved the county money! Later Philadelphia County invoked other unconstitutional policy, to deny the reality of domestic violence and to deny the reality that women are victims, and Philadelphia county also refused to acknowledge the Constitution both state and federal applied to me or my kids. 5 judges came and went and all 5 refused to acknowledge all fact or law; all actively sought to 108
dump the case as they knew it was SCOTUS bound due to how my children ever came to be in the custody of the Herbert's and then the Austin's. But not their father or me. Again the number of acts prevents me from listing them all separately and I did enter the paper trail to the federal court already but I must name the most serious action of all which the officers of the Philadelphia courts should hang for: 158. David Austin and I were and are strangers to one another and are of no relation not even via marriage. This man not only did not know me but he and I weren't related then and are not now. If you read the affidavit the Austin's entered to then secure standing in the courts only David Austin filed and only he filled it out. He and his lawyer perjured themselves VERBALLY claiming we are related and VERBALLY claiming that they had no idea where I was and that I could not stand as I was incapacitated, a lie, when they then filled in, in WRITING, "North Dakota" as my physical location and left each and every space regarding my person blank up to and including eye and hair color when my hair is unmistakably red - if you ever laid eyes on me which David Austin had not as we are absolute strangers. The children's actual relation, Cate Austin, signed nothing and may not have even appeared that day. David Austin's motive was ownership of a house, the $1 deed of which I entered, as that is what he was paid to commit perjury. BUT: What Philadelphia County did? What that judge did by upholding that affidavit that completely conflicted with the verbal testimony and so awarding the Austin's temporary custody of me and my kids? It's as if in Philadelphia county and later the other counties ruled that a person, a man with zero interest and zero right, can walk to a park, pick out two kids he likes and then go to a courthouse and say, "I just saw two kids I want to steal. What do I fill out so I can get away with kidnapping kids that are not mine and that I'm not even related to?" and as if Philadelphia then said it was acceptable and even legal to pick two kids at random and file for custody of them. To my knowledge Philadelphia County has not stopped allowing unrelated men from filing - as long as they hire a criminal lawyer who will VERBALLY support the lies they tell in court; the county has never once checked the written affidavits against the verbal testimony and/or actual reality. When I brought this up judges began dropping like flies. Believe it or not this isn't the worst thing that 109
happened to us in Philadelphia County but is the event I find most incredulous. In 1996 and 1997 Duval County unconstitutionally dismissed felony assault charges against one of our batterers; the county and state admitted to unconstitutional policy targeting women: It said it routinely dismissed charges made against Navy personnel. It only contacted me after the fact thus those felony assault charges remain as does something else: My sons legal status as an unborn person who is now 13 years old. My children had their rights violated before their birth and one of them has managed to preserve that legal standing as I not once failed to act in his defense not even when the entire US Navy set its sights on me in an attempt to shake me. FL and Duval County caved but I did not. To this very day Duval county continues to act against me as it now refuses to hear emergency motions and refuses to let me represent myself; Duval County told me over and over that it did not allow parents to represent their own persons. At one point county agents physically held me against my will in an attempt to stop me from filing the paperwork and only released me when I threatened to go back to SCOTUS and name them individually. They flinched when I informed them that they would find my name on the SCOTUS docket two times over thus I could and would go after them. Upon filing those papers which is an emergency motion? Both family court judges ran, they literally and actually ran as they went home and then called in sick the next day and to date this motion sits unaddressed within the court. It is now about two years old. NOTHING that subsequently happened to my kids or me could have happened if FL and Duval County had obeyed the law of FL and the law of the US in 1996. Yes, I would have been injured and yes Bush V Gore would have happened and injured me further but my kids? They would not have suffered for a single day once I filed those felony assault charges. The counties and their agents abused us more and worse than any family member ever did and so the counties and their agents caused my death, a physical death I survived, and caused my children's most severe injuries both physical and metal. 159. Approximately a year and a half ago FL admitted to other unjust policy that targeted women and made the injury inescapable as it subjected women to repeated assault and even lethal danger: Besides 110
their policy to never press charges if the spouse was a Navy spouse FL had policy that dictated the state was not to press charges if a woman was strangled into unconsciousness but did not die as prosecuting the case was difficult and expensive thus women were denied remedy and relief and their batterers walked. FL is not alone in doing this so men learned exactly how to abuse women but not pay the price; that is they learned what they could and could not do to women as the states did not prosecute some crimes like attempted strangulation. .About a year and a half ago FL admitted to this policy and passed new law regarding attempted strangulation – as the cases were increasing. Why wouldn’t they if FL wasn’t prosecuting them??? I was a victim l this policy as the 2 nd degree assault charges were fro attempted strangulation and holding me at knifepoint for about eight hours while pregnant. FL has a 911 call it refused to release to me and my attorneys; to this day i have never received a copy of this call although FL admits it exists. 160. I count Sanford Finkle and Arnold Weinstein as court officers as that is what they pretended to be and that is what Sanford Finkle told the US Marshal's Office that he was; he misrepresented himself as an officer acting for the Rennselaer county court, as if the court asked him to do so or as if it was his official job. Arnold Weinstein acted to white out his name but not his secretary's name on copies of early court documents he faxed to my attorney, to me and to the subsequent courts as he understood exactly what he did by signing and entering that false affidavit and when fabricating a false court petition, when making a bad case he always knew was not an actual case. Sanford Finkle and his action is more heinous in my opinion as every single event in NY and that happened after the fact of the December 2000 Philadelphia County Court appearance and ruling and that is still happening today, even the federal activity, can be directly traced to his person. That is, he caused it all by first entering that made up cause of action, INSURANCE, and later authoring and entering closing arguments and an appellate brief that contained zero fact, zero supporting evidence, zero case law and zero cause; as he completely made up INSURANCE as a cause of action he then had no case law and no evidence. The one thing he entered NY says you may not give weight to and Griffin did not. Sanford Finkle is even 111
connected to NY Appellate Judge J. Mugglin who authored an exactly worded violation of the bill of rights in my case as he had nothing to use – cite - and/or rely upon to then rule against me so he too made it up only badly so and Finkle is also connected to employees of Albany Law School who lied to me, injured me with impunity and who leaked confidential information contained in my file - it is one exact person named Lorraine and I already entered the proof to the federal court - as well as the lawyer who deliberately lost my case as he did not argue what I and my family court attorney ordered him to argue and whose facts are custom tailored to my own. While I do not know exactly how Greg Rinckey came to be assigned to my case as it was not random I can and did connect Rinckey to Sanford Finkle and to Linda Griffin and Finkle is the reason, the cause, I ever came to meet Griffin, McMillan, Ortiz and Cale or even the master for the state of NY. Everything after December of 2000 is directly due to his person and his actions. Let him blame the Austin's for hiring him or for Griffin listening to his non-argument as Finkle's reputation in Rennselaer county and in the Albany area is if you want and need a slimeball who will do anything for a buck then hire Sanford Finkle. As I was raised in this area I know plus Finkle is the guy who wrote an exact lie, slapped it on the last page of his appellate non-argument and so invalidated a good contract upon appeal thus I wouldn't be able to sue the Austin's for that house as if I did? He wouldn't get paid or so the seller, Catherine Garrett, told me. It's common knowledge among lawyers as judges know to look for this slimy behavior and that any lawyer who does it is scum of the Earth and so is any judge who pretends he does not know it, as he assumes Susan is stupid as she's a woman without a paper license. As I'm an attorney who knows at least one other ethical attorney and plenty of unethical ones I know this; I was told this to my face several times over. Law schools teach this trick and Albany Law did not deny it upon direct confrontation. I'm a victim who knew but was forced to sit back and watch her victimization unfold as no action on my part was ever going to stop it save for forcing SCOTUS to act directly upon my direct entry whether they then filed the paperwork or not as a part of my knowledge is the criminal activity in the cases of women and in my case is endemic today. SCOTUS announced it would harm me when I first contacted it in February of 2007; as not one woman ever made the case for equality and no male scientist 112
ever resolved Uniformity I then knew the threat the SCOTUS clerks made would come to be realized as I was it; my testimony has always been that the clerk named will said he knew what elements to look for in the case of equality and that I seemed to be the case so he would sink me and my case -THE case - and so would the other clerks. If the vote of a woman has never, ever had actual legal power why wouldn't I believe him? Why wouldn't I believe any and all threats ever made against my person by the people who face jail time for what they did to me and my sons? Did PA, NY or FL and the involved counties and officers ever truly believe I wasn't threatened and wasn't harmed? The answer is: they don't put people who are safe into protective custody; they reserve it for those whose lives are in actual danger. In the person of Susan Herbert, as they could not make her their victim and could not force her to be guilty as I am not they knew they met their match and that I was SCOTUS bound thus liability would ensue – for all women and children so they felt they HAD to get rid of me, harm me and even kill me - to protect the status quo. Most obviously and blatantly Rinckey's partner took over for Griffin when she retired so Finkle has an even closer, more friendly buddy on the Rennselaer County Family court bench: Rinckey's firm is named Tully, Rinckey and Associates; that exact Tully took over in place of Linda Griffin. 161. As SCOTUS petitions 07-9804, 08-6622 and 09-6777 state and as the complaints now before this court state (See Herbert V Obama) the counties in several states victimized me and even committed crimes against me. Rennselaer county NY and so agents of the county lied under oath, manipulated facts, manufactured facts, ignored the law, violated the law, tampered with evidence and with proof, manipulated the system, acted upon unconstitutional policy and even perjured themselves under oath to then make the awarding of the custody of my children and the injury my person suffered at their hands seem to be legal and justified. Some of these officials went so far as to abuse my children with full knowing and deliberation. Others were caught in the act of violating their mandates and their licenses and at least one agent, Leslie Ortiz, a lawyer and my children's guardian ad litum abused my children by pretending she did not understand them when they told her they had been kidnapped and 113
that they wanted to live with me, their real mother, and which she then failed to report to any person and even denied in her written assessment as if my children never told her, and who engaged in a relationship outside of the court with the persons who injured us as she was at the time and might still be a neighbor of the third parties. I myself caught her in the act, as she was caught in very close, intimate conversation with Cate Austin in the bathroom of the Rennselaer County courthouse during a break in the proceedings. 162. Another agent, a social worker, failed to report abuse she witnessed and later a master for the state lied under oath as they claimed that no such report existed against David Austin when it did and when someone had blacked out the name of the reporter - me. The social worker, Allanna McMillan, acting in conjunction with the Austin's and one Randy Cale, a person hired solely to manufacture evidence against me and in favor of the Austin's and who is known to be a “court whore”, COUNTY EMPLOYEES INCLUDING GRIFFIN’S OWN CLERK TOLD ME AND MY ATTORNEY THIS EXACTLY and who testified to the impossible upon the witness stand and who reported that he knew the real reason Cate Austin had brought my children to him was so that he would then generate a report against me, he actually said it was about blame when he testified, then concocted a report against me and based her false finding upon: Stories told about me from a time before my children were even born. She interviewed out of state nonwitnesses and never spoke to me; this incredulous report and subsequent finding was dismissed by NY but it was during this fair hearing that the master for the state perjured himself and that the report against David Austin was blacked out and then unbelievably entered against me! As if it was a report I generated against my own self! My lawyer smelled a rat so she said if the state was insisting that the reports used to find me were the same report and not separate, different reports as NY claimed as they did not match so NY's claim made no sense then NY would have no objection to her entering BOTH reports to then prove the report that I abused my children was falsified by McMillan and that it only came to be as the Austin's sought revenge. Trapped by their own lies NY agreed and then later admitted McMillan had zero grounds to ever find me guilty of abuse. The state and county never 114
did take action against the actual abuser, David Austin, nor did it ever admit to its perjury or to its tampering of the evidence. No action was ever taken against any of the involved people who to this day are allowed to harm women and children with immunity. See Austin V Herbert, a legally enforced kidnapping perpetrated by the county of Rennselaer and the state of NY which is partly the result of favor and partisan politics. Details of these acts are found within the lower federal court and within SCOTUS petitions 079804, 08-6622 and 09-6777. They are too numerous to name here; literally I can name hundreds of acts and all of them are egregious. I submitted the entire paper trail proving all of my claims to the federal courthouse in Jacksonville FL. NY never had the legal right to hear this case; in fact like BVG there was no actual case to be had but the county allowed the Austin's to manufacture one by first making up a fantasy cause of action: The petition the Austin's submitted in the spring of 2001 stated that the Austin's were seeking third party custody of my children and my person as they needed MEDICAL INSURANCE. MEDICAL INSURANCE IS NOT AN ACTUAL CAUSE OF ACTION IN THE CASE OF THE CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN ANY STATE. IT IS OFFENSIVE TO EVERYONE OF MY SENSIBILITIES THAT NY AND THIS COUNTY ALLOWED THIRD PARTIES ENTRY AND HEARD THIS CLAIM AND THEN HORRIFICALLY LET THE AUSTIN'S CHANGE THE CLAIM GRADUALLY OVER THE COURSE OF 4 YEARS UNTIL IT WAS UNRECOGNIZABLE. LITERALLY NY AND THIS COUNTY AND SO ALL OF THE AGENTS STATE AND COUNTY BECAME OUR ABUSER AND THE PERPETRATORS FOR W/O THEM? THERE WAS NO CASE! INSURANCE IS NOT A CAUSE TO TAKE CHILDREN FROM THE MOTHER PLUS THE AUSTINS NEVER DENIED THAT THE CHILDREN ONLY CAME TO BE WITH THEM AS THEY PARTICIPATED IN A KIDNAPPING. 163. Thus there is zero excuse for the County of Rennselaer. I aksed over and over WHY Randy Cale was allowed to enter the County courthouse if it was common knowledge he was being paid to abuse children and I never received an answer other than that “judges know to ignore him” and “judges do not listen to anything he says”. The real, actual reason is much more sinister: County employees know Cale ot be a hired 115
gun, a “court whore” but as parents might not? A judge uses him exactly like the lawyer Finkle did as did the Austin’s to then force a ruling that goes against all acceptable evidence and proof. In my case his testimony was upheld as sterling by Griffin when it was her own court clerk who said Griffin would never do this as she knew all about Cale. Griffin then rejects Cale’s testimony when it benefits her agenda and uses it when it benefits her agenda- as all judges do. Most telling? If you bother to read Cale’s report he assigns blame to my person; he says my children seemed opt be angry and says it is anger at me when my kids NEVER said that. He uses words to make it seem as if and when he knows he can’t testify to anything about me unless he meets me in person. I not only proved Cale perjured himself by testifying to the impossible but that he tampered with his own records in order to hide what my kids did tell him and to hide the fact that he abused them in his office. When I told my attorney three years after the fact? She was stunned. Guess what? It has to do with the difference between absolute and whole numbers – again like BVG as the injury is endemic or from the lone citizen up to the office of President - and so only an extremely observant person who knows her math inside out as well as is an expert in human behavior would ever have discovered this, that is, I knew Cale had done what my children reported to me and what I myself heard him admit from upon the witness stand but when my attorney asked me to prove it as if she had never been in the room to hear his testimony she was blown away when I told her HOW it was very easy to prove as it never occurred to her. Thus Rennselaer and counties all across this nation have no excuse and no reason for what they have done as I have encountered this courtroom nonsense in over 5 states. It’s proof that men have no protected right of custody of children and that giving it to them as a right then violates the original separation of powers known as biology thus causing women and children to be sold and humanly trafficked across state lines and by county and state authorities. SCOTUS created a situation whereby the abuse and battery of women is inescapable as men are allowed to use the courts to do it. Lawyers know this but refuse to bring the case as it means less money for them. MONEY was always the reason lawyers cited when refusing to act and/or to represent me.. ALL counties in the US have discriminatory and unjust policies that harm women and their children as they justify their actions by 116
citing SCOTUS rulings decided in error and even wrongly; to justify the injury they deny reality and ignore all fact and law. 164. Philadelphia county had unjust policy targeting women - to ignore all claims of domestic violence but in Philadelphia it was taken a step further: My children and my person were placed in protective custody. While in protective custody our named batterers then petitioned the court to gain custody of the children and so stop me from criminally prosecuting them as the children were used as threat against me as in "if you prosecute us youll never see them again". Our named bafterers were not only allowed to petition the court but were also allowed to manipulate the docket by being heard first - to prevent me from appearing as they were concerned I'd find out they had entered a petition and so appear. They and their attorney perjured themselves and even though they were named as our batterers they were given my children; my children were removed from protective custody and handed over to the very people named as those we needed to be protected from! Upon direct confrontation I was told Philadelphia County had a policy to award children to any related person even the named batterers as it then saved the county money! Later Philadelphia County invoked other unconstitutional policy, to deny the reality of domestic violence and to deny the reality that women are victims, and Philadelphia county also refused to acknowledge the Constitution both state and federal applied to me or my kids. 5 judges came and went and all 5 refused to acknowledge all fact or law; all actively sought to dump the case as they knew it was SCOTUS bound due to how my children ever came to be in the custody of the Herbert's and then the Austin's. But not their father or me. Again the number of acts prevents me from listing them all separately and I did enter the paper trail to the federal court already but I must name the most serious action of all which the officers of the Philadelphia courts should hang for: 165. David Austin and I were and are strangers to one another and are of no relation not even via marriage. This man not only did not know me but he and I weren't related then and are not now. If you read the affidavit the Austin's entered to then secure standing in the courts only David Austin filed and only he filled it out. He and his lawyer perjured 117
themselves VERBALLY claiming we are related and VERBALLY claiming that they had no idea where I was and that I could not stand as I was incapacitated, a lie, when they then filled in, in WRITING, "North Dakota" as my physical location and left each and every space regarding my person blank up to and including eye and hair color when my hair is unmistakably red - if you ever laid eyes on me which David Austin had not as we are absolute strangers. The children's actual relation, Cate Austin, signed nothing and may not have even appeared that day. David Austin's motive was ownership of a house, the $1 deed of which I entered, as that is what he was paid to commit perjury. BUT: What Philadelphia County did? What that judge did by upholding that affidavit that completely conflicted with the verbal testimony and so awarding the Austin's temporary custody of me and my kids? It's as if in Philadelphia county and later the other counties ruled that a person, a man with zero interest and zero right, can walk to a park, pick out two kids he likes and then go to a courthouse and say, "I just saw two kids I want to steal. What do I fill out so I can get away with kidnapping kids that are not mine and that I'm not even related to?" and as if Philadelphia then said it was acceptable and even legal to pick two kids at random and file for custody of them! To my knowledge Philadelphia county has not stopped allowing unrelated men from filing -as long as they hire a criminal lawyer who will VERBALLY support the lies they tell in court; the county has never once checked the fiw affidavits against the verbal testimony and/or actual reality. When I brought this up judges began dropping like flies. Believe it or not this isn't the worst thing that happened to us in Philadelphia County but is the event I find most incredulous. In 1996 and 1997 Duval County unconstitutionally dismissed felony assault charges against one of our batterers; the county and state admitted to unconstitutional policy targeting women: It said it routinely dismissed charges made against Navy personnel. It only contacted me after the fact thus those felony assault charges remain as does something else: My sons legal status as an unborn person who is now 13 years old. My children had their rights violated before their birth and one of them has managed to preserve that legal standing as I not once failed to act in his defense not even when the entire US Navy set its sights on me in an attempt to shake me. FL and Duval County caved but I did not. To this very day Duval county continues to act against me as it 118
now refuses to hear emergency motions and refuses to let me represent myself; Duval County told me over and over that it did not allow parents to represent their own persons. At one point county agents physically held me against my will in an attempt to stop me from filing the paperwork and only released me when I threatened to go back to SCOTUS and name them individually. They flinched when I informed them that they would find my name on the SCOTUS docket two times over thus I could and would go after them. Upon filing those papers which is an emergency motion? Both family court judges ran, they literally and actually ran as they went home and then called in sick the next day and to date this motion sits unaddressed within the court. It is now about two years old. NOTHING that subsequently happened to my kids or me could have happened if FL and Duval County had obeyed the law of FL and the law of the US in 1996. Yes, I would have been injured and yes Bush V Gore would have happened and injured me further but my kids? They would not have suffered for a single day once I filed those felony assault charges. The counties and their agents abused us more and worse than any family member ever did and so the counties and their agents caused my death, a physical death I survived, and caused my children's most severe injuries both physical and metal. 166. Approximately a year and a half ago FL admitted to other unjust policy that targeted women and made the injury inescapable as it subjected women to repeated assault and even lethal danger: Besides their policy to never press charges if the spouse was a Navy spouse FL had policy that dictated the state was not to press charges if a woman was strangled into unconsciousness but did not die as prosecuting the case was difficult and expensive thus women were denied remedy and relief and their batterers walked. FL is not alone in doing this so men learned exactly how to abuse women but not pay the price; that is they learned what they could and could not do to women as the states did not prosecute some crimes like attempted strangulation. .About a year and a half ago FL admitted ot this policy and passed new law regarding attempted strangulation – as the cases were increasing. Why wouldn’t they if FL wasn’t prosecuting them??? I was a victim l this policy as the 2 nd degree assault charges were fro attempted strangulation and holding me 119
at knifepoint for about eight hours while pregnant. FL has a 911 call it refused to release to me and my attorneys; to this day i have never received a copy of this call although FL admits it exists. 167. I count Sanford Finkle and Arnold Weinstein as court officers as that is what they pretended to be and that is what Sanford Finkle told the US Marshal's Office that he was; he misrepresented himself as an officer acting for the Rennselaer county court, as if the court asked him to do so or as if it was his official job. Arnold Weinstein acted to white out his name but not his secretary's name on copies of early court documents he faxed to my attorney, to me and to the subsequent courts as he understood exactly what he did by signing and entering that false affidavit and when fabricating a false court petition, when making a bad case he always knew was not an actual case. Sanford Finkle and his action is more heinous in my opinion as every single event in NY and that happened after the fact of the December 2000 Philadelphia County Court appearance and ruling and that is,ig still happening today, even the federal activity, can be directly traced to his person. That is, he caused it all by first entering that made up cause of action, INSURANCE, and later authoring and entering closing arguments and an appellate brief that contained zero fact, zero supporting evidence, zero case law and zero cause; as he completely made up INSURANCE as a cause of action he then had no case law and no evidence. The one thing he entered NY says you may not give weight to and Griffin did not. Sanford Finkle is even connected to NY Appellate Judge J. Mugglin who authored an exactly worded violation of the bill of rights in my case as he had no thing to use – cite - and/or rely upon to then rule against me so he too made it up only badly so and Finkle is also connected to employees of Albany Law School who lied to me, injured me with impunity and who leaked confidential information contained in my file - it is one exact person named Lorraine and I already entered the proof to the federal court - as well as the lawyer who deliberately lost my case as he did not argue what I and my family court attorney ordered him to argue and whose facts are custom tailored to my own. While I do not know exactly how Greg Rinckey came to be assigned to my case as it was not random I can and did connect Rinckey to Sanford Finkle and to Linda Griffin and Finkle is the reason, the cause, I 120
ever came to meet Griffin, McMillan, Ortiz and Cale or even the master for the state of NY. Everything after December of 2000 is directly due to his person and his actions. Let him blame the Austin's for hiring him or for Griffin listening to his non-argument as Finkle's reputation in Rennselaer county and in the Albany area is if you want and need a slimeball who will do anything for a buck then hire Sanford Finkle. As I was raised in this area I know plus Finkle is the guy who wrote an exact lie, slapped it on the last page of his appellate non-argument and so invalidated a good contract upon appeal thus I wouldn't be able to sue the Austin's for that house as if I did? He wouldn't get paid or so the seller, Catherine Garrett, told me. It's common knowledge among lawyers as judges know to look for this slimy behavior and that any lawyer who does it is scum of the Earth and so is any judge who pretends he does not know it, as he assumes Susan is stupid as she's a woman without a paper license. As I'm an attorney who knows at least one other ethical attorney and plenty of unethical ones I know this; I was told this to my face several times over. Law schools teach this trick and Albany Law did not deny it upon direct confrontation. I'm a victim who knew but was forced to sit back and watch her victimization unfold as no action on my part was ever going to stop it save for forcing SCOTUS to act directly upon my direct entry whether they then filed the paperwork or not as a part of my knowledge is the criminal activity in the cases of women and in my case is endemic today. SCOTUS announced it would harm me when I first contacted it in February of 2007; as not one woman ever made the case for equality and no male scientist ever resolved Uniformity I then knew the threat the SCOTUS clerks made would come to be realized as I was it; my testimony has always been that the clerk named will said he knew what elements to look for in the case of equality and that I seemed to be the case so he would sink me and my case -THE case - and so would the other clerks. If the vote of a woman has never, ever had actual legal power why wouldn't I believe him? Why wouldn't I believe any and all threats ever made against my person by the people who face jail time for what they did to me and my sons? Did PA, NY or FL and the involved counties and officers ever truly believe I wasn't threatened and wasn't harmed? The answer is: they don't put people who are safe into protective custody; they reserve it for those whose lives are in actual danger. In the person of Susan Herbert, as they 121
could not make her their victim and could not force her to be guilty as I am not they knew they met their match and that I was SCOTUS bound thus liability would ensue – for all women and children so they felt they HAD to get rid of me, harm me and even kill me - to protect the status quo. Most obviously and blatantly Rinckey's partner took over for Griffin when she retired so Finkle has an even closer, more friendly buddy on the Rennselaer County Family court bench: Rinckey's firm is named Tully, Rinckey and Associates; that exact Tully took over in place of Linda Griffin. 168. You can never ever ignore or deny the fact that the house sold for $1 was owned by Garrett Murphy, the DEMOCRATIC national director of literacy for NY State and that the Austin’s have a relative with a law license who I was told had ties to Albany Law and who advised them on what to do if their lie was detected by the Appellate judges. Hmmmm, what if they never knew their attorney, Finkle, set this up in their name? So when it is pointed out to them they scream they did not bribe anybody? They bribed Finkle by paying him to do whatever he needed to do never considering the corruption was endemic or did they as who lobbied so hard o return to NY, a state in which they had zero standing but got it regardless? I’m not crazy folks as all of this happened. I have little or no cash so I got burned as I was never perceived to be the threat I turned out to become – by willing myself to power, by willing myself to do what none of you were willing to do: Make the case for women at long last. I’m not supposed to be forced to prove my case in my complaint or to prove anything at all in writing but in person. So far all federal judges have proven is: NOTHING a pro se woman writes will ever satisfy them as what they want is for women to fail and so all citizens will be their slaves and their indentured servants forever. All federal judges want this as the case for equality means federal judges have to start applying the law to their own persons thus no special favor anymore. If they did not personally want this? Why keep the case out? Why resort to garbage like “insufficient fact” when all of my written testimony is 1st person eyewitness sworn testimony thus it is HISTORY so you do not get to even claim that at all as it is always a lie, an exact lie if you do? FEDERAL JUDGES ARE DENYING HISTORY; LIKE WHITE SUPREMACISTS DENY THE 122
HOLOCAUST FEDERAL JUDGES DENY WE WON THE REVOLUTION, DENY BUSH V GORE WAS HEARD AND DENY WOMEN ARE HUMAN AND ARE EQUAL TO MEN. THEY DENY THE LONE CITIZEN IS EQUAL TO A FEDERAL JUDGE EVEN THOUGH OUR FOUNDERS AND THEN JOHN MARSHALL SAID THE LONE MALE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS EQUAL TO THE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER, THAT ONE VOTE IS EQUIVALENT TO AN EXECUTIVE ORDER. If none of this history happened then how did you ever become a federal judge? Where are my children and why? And how did I come to be alone, forever pro se and the only the second American ever to enter SCOTUS directly? How did SCOTUS ever come to exist if none of this happened? Insufficient fact and no arguable basis is not it or SCOTUS would not have entered me let alone acted upon The People’s case and my case, both one and the same. 169. No woman is safe in these counties or in any county in this nation as this is going on everywhere, as that is what the word endemic means. Corruption that rose from the lone citizen and is within the entire government harms them in our most fundamental court, family court, the point of entry to the system and so the law for most women. It causes a situation whereby the nuclear family backed by the county and its agents is the reason women are initially shut out of the process in such a way they are incapacitated thus experience only what is undue and unjust upon every level of society. No liberty and injustice is then 'imprinted' upon their person and their children's persons, as if women are actually weak and les than. My crime? Overcoming this by doing what no man ever did thus proving via action tat I am equal to the Chief Justice or President as I made the case no other human could. Because you can’t wrap your head around the reasoning, because you can’t understand the logic, and as you can’t admit a woman bested you at your own game then that does not give you the power and authority to then harm me with impunity as ignorance is never an excuse. Your only choice as several million citizen voters do understand this legal argument? Let us appear in our own courtroom and make our case. If I fail then it is no skin off of your back but it may cost me my life. Whoever told you that you could condemn me to death w/o so much as one appearance in person in a just venue NOT in FL, NY or PA? 123
Or condemn any of us to death w/o any appearance in person? About 7,000 people read the documents I posted on Scribed and that is merely one site. The last numbers I had were 5 million, that at least 5 million had been informed and so had chosen me as their representative. How large would that number be if all were informed? I am not to be faulted if every man alive CAN’T understand the concept known as constitutional authority as his own mother was injured. The fact Zoss is a man disqualifies him from opining in this case at all as men have been harming women for ten thousand years or more w/o any relief and men can never ever know woman, pregnancy or birth as absolute fact. Zoss knew this yet still tried to FORCE us to believe that he had given birth to a baby thus did know it as fact or that he is smarter than I am only as he has a title. What? His appointment makes him special or different, more able and capable than I? He’s arguing a commission as a judge; I’m arguing a commission as President. He’s arguing “judge” makes you better then woman no matter who or what that woman is. If any judge in this nation were as smart as I and as gifted as I when it comes to reasoning law? Their name would be on the SCOTUS docket as both counsel and victim as federal judges have been victimized by lawyers, by Bush V Gore and by the parties. Seriously: As The Republic died so did your appointment even if you are the most righteous, most just federal judge on Earth. The answer is not to rule that women have zero power and zero authority over their own persons or over federal judges and can never, ever act as Chief Justice and/or Commander. The answer is to make an attempt to understand what even James Madison could not: Madison never understood constitutional authority as he advocated that a select group of philosophers should run the nation. Jefferson tried to teach Madison but couldn’t: If you are a living government of people then the citizens are the scientists that conduct the experiment and evaluate the results and the citizens are the philosophers that then produce the ideas that feed the government. The People are the select group that should run the nation. Want and need quality people? Start with yourself, as you aren’t above or outside The People; if the nation needs a “constitutional physicist” and we never had one, no school teaches it and there may be only one job in the whole world that requires it and they want anybody but you so your prospects seem to be nonexistent?
Volunteer to become it; discover it; define it; do it. If you succeed? Then they might have to consider you. You became the world’s first, one and only, professional constitutional physicist and you did it by yourself so somebody might reason and decide you should be invited to join a select group and run the nation. Then you truly, actually are a member of a very, very select group: a voter. Madison had no idea what made him special. We have voters; we’ve always had voters. What we need is People who are willing to act; to abide by the terms no matter what, as they understand all they are is a person with one vote so they don’t know better but only different. We need people who play well together not who are the same, voters abiding by the terms only as they want to and so will. Abiding by the terms is their interest as that yields the greatest profit: Quality people. Businessmen and lawyers do not play well together as they are often in the same bed but scientists and philosophers check one another as philosophers remind scientists while you can you sometimes shouldn’t and scientists remind philosophers some ideas are great in theory only thus should remain theories. We need to become a nation of scientists and philosophers, as Jefferson would not recognize the modern political party or the country he invented. This court has all of the proof it needs: Barack Obama and Susan Herbert. Why can’t Obama be made to appear and talk about himself and how he came to believe what he says he truly believes thus prove he is natural born? I can do this easily. You, the judge, do not get to decide as The People do. You don’t get to judge us as The Constitution is. Since when does a President NOT answer to The People? If this court wants other proof and other evidence it may examine all I entered to the record. It may also read the SCOTUS docket. The Constitution does not tell The People or me what we cannot do but it does tell this court what it cannot do and thus far there is no constitutional basis for this court’s actions no matter how they sound. Paul Zoss is guilty of attempted rape as that is what he tried to do to me as rape is not about sex but about power and control. I say attempted as I can keep Paul Zoss and any other man from getting what they want from me forever, a feeling, which reasons why and how I made it so far: you can try to rape me and you can try to murder me and you can even attack my children but you’ll never, ever, ever get me to truly believe that I’m your victim. I’ll shoot if I have to as you do not scare me nor does the named threat you make against me: prison and/or death. I’m already in prison and I know death so what’s to be afraid of?
For good measure attached is another copy of the SCOTUS docket and the private detective’s report on Obama. All other paper evidence and proof is attached to the other cases within this court that Zoss illegally and in violation of the law dismissed. But again paper is never absolute proof as people are the proof in a Constitutional Republic. If you’re not dead a dead institution, that is. Gonzales and her attorney had the incorrect argument but I do not. It will be highly embarrassing for this nation and this nation may never, ever recover if I make an appearance in world court and/or in the Vatican court. For if that happens? Who knows, as I could become the leader of a competing nation thus turn it around, into a just nation with a Declaration and Constitution that they live out as reality. It, The People, could then mop the floor with the US, the institution, upon an international level: “Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded because they flatter the people, in order to betray them.” Justice Joseph Story
THIS SEEMS TO BE LOST UPON ALL WHO READ THIS CASE:
IN ANY AND ALL CASES THAT ARE FILED WITHIN SCOTUS THE US MUST RESPOND, AS THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT IS THE PEOPLE. EVERY PETITION THAT IS FILED THUS DOCKETED RECEIVES AN ANSWER. IN AN AUTHORITY CASE THE NAMED PARTIES MUST RESPOND BUT IN ANY CASE THE US MUST RESPOND. IN MY CASE THE US DID NOT AND THEN NO NAMED PARTY RESPONDED! IN MY UNIQUE CASE THE US FAILED TO RESPOND AND WHEN I CAME BACK TO ADDRESS THIS THEN NO PERSON ANSWERED THUS NO ANSWER EVER CAME FROM ANYONE. THE SG MAY NOT ANSWER FOR EXACTLY NAMED PARTIES LIKE OBAMA AND ROBERTS. THE SG CAN AND MAY IF THE CASE IS NOT AN AUTHORITY CASE AS THE SG THEN WOULD BE SPEAKING FOR THE OFFICERS.
BUT EXACTLY NAMED PARTIES? NOT! THE SG MAY NOT ADDRESS DEFAULT ANOTHER SG ENTERED BY MAGICALLY CLAIMING IT NEVER, EVER HAPPENED. REMEMBER, SHE ONLY SITS AS THE DEFAULT CAME ON 11/05/08 THE DAY AFTER THE ELECTION THAT MADE HER THE SG AND THAT SOUGHT TO INVALIDATE THAT ELECTION AS IT IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE INVALIDATED UNTIL ADDRESSED OR WE WILL DIE LIKE ROME; OUR EVENTUAL PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION IS IN THE WORKS. THE SG HAS AN INSURMOUNTABLE CONFLICT THEN AS WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO OVERCOME IT? SHE FAILED. SHE HAD TO, BY LAW AND ALL PRECEDENT, ANSWER WHY OR DEFAULT AGAIN OR ANSWER AND ADMIT THAT I, THUS THE PEOPLE, WON THE CASE. SHE MAY NOT ENTER A BLANKET WAIVER THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO ANYONE BUT HER OWN PERSON. YOU CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC IF NOBODY ANSWERS YOUR PETITION – IF YOU HAVE NO LIVING PEOPLE - AND THE CURRENTLY SITTING SG CANNOT THEN RESPOND AS SHE DID AS SHE WOULD NOT EVEN BE SITTING IF A RESPONSE CAME THE FIRST TIME. THE RESPONSE, DEFAULT, THEN APPLIES TO THE CURRENT SG. ONCE DEFAULT IS THEN IT IS. THE CURRENT SG MAY NOT RESPOND TO SUCH A DEFAULT BY THEN DEFAULTING OVER AGAIN OR COMMITTING WHAT IS A CRIME. IT’S LIKE THIS: ONCE I REASONED WHY WAIVING THE RIGHT AND INTEREST WAS CRIMINAL AND THAT THE CASE CAPTION WAS CHANGED THEN THE ORIGINAL SG FAILED TO RESPOND. THUS THEY REALIZED THEY NEVER HAD THE POWER OR AUTHORITY TO DO THAT IN THIS CASE. SO THEN UNLESS THE CASE WAS HEARD IN PERSON AND UNLESS IT WAS RULED THAT THE SG MAY WAIVE THE US’ INTEREST AND RIGHT IN AN AUTHORITY CASE THEN ELENA KAGAN CAN’T DO IT – SHE MAY NOT – AND AS I NAMED HER AND TOLD HER? SHE THEN DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME MISTAKENLY BUT WITH DELIBERATION. KAGAN IS ASSUMING SHE WILL NEVER BE MADE TO SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES. SHE WILL AND MAJOR CONSEQUENCES AS WHAT HAPPENS IF THE US DOES THIS NOT MISTAKENLY BUT WITH DELIBERATION/ IT HAS JUST CONCEDED THAT ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY BELONGS TO THE WORLD IN THE FORM OF THE WORLD COURT AS WHAT KAGAN DID IS CLAIM THE SITTING OFFICERS HAVE NO INTEREST AND NO RIGHT ONLY SHE UNLIKE THE 127
FIRST SG DID IT WITH MOTIVATION AND INTENT: SHE IS AFRAID OF THE REPERCUSSIONS OF ENFORCING THE LAW. SHE GAVE OUR SOVEREIGNTY AWAY AS SHE WAS TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE SITTING OFFICERS AS I’M ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE ONCE THE US FAILED TO RESPOND AT ALL. THAT’S HOW I KNOW I’LL WIN IN WORLD COURT AND WIN IN SUCH A WAY YOU MIGHT HAVE A BLOODBATH ON YOUR HANDS AS IT THEN DOES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO TURN INTO ANOTHER FRENCH REVOLUTION. YOU WANT AND NEED TO ALLOW THE PEOPLE AN APPEARANCE IN PERSON -WE’RE NOT ASKING AS IT IS OURS ALREADY – TO THEN PROTECT ANY SITTING OFFICERS THAT DID NOT ACT TO INJURE US WITH DELIBERATION. IF YOU DON’T THEN EVERY OFFICER IS SUBJECT TO REMOVAL NOM MATTER WHAT THEY DID OR DID NOT DO. HERE YOU GO AND IT IS PARTLY WHY I KEEP NAMING PAUL ZOSS: YOU DO NOT NEED TO PROTECT THE OFFICERS AS THEY ARE NOT THE VICTIMS. NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I ENCOUNTERED SO MANY UNJUST PERSONS, JUDGES, ACTING WITH ALL OF THEIR MIGHT TO PROTECT THE PERPETRATORS OVER THE VICTIMS. WHY? THE SAME REASON THE PARTIES AND PRIVATEERS DO IT: AS JUDGES KNOW THEY HAD ZERO BUSINESS DOING SEVERAL THINGS THEY DID UPON A ROUTINE BASIS LIKE PLAYING THOSE NASTY WORD GAMES WITHIN RULINGS. IF YOU ARE INNOCENT? IF YOU DID IT BUT NEVER KNEW THE HARM IT CAUSED? THEN YOU’D HAVE NO REASON TO FEAR THIS CASE. ONLY THE GUILTY FEAR THIS CASE THUS MANUFACTURE MORE AND MORE LIES. GUILTY PEOPLE ACT GUILTY. IN THE WORLD COURT LOCATED IN DC SO I CAN AND WILL WIN THERE THUS IT IS OPEN SEASON ON ALL OF THE OFFICERS AS WE ONLY CONTROL THIS IF IT REMAINS WITHIN A FEDERAL COURTHOUSE? ALL I HAVE TO DO IS ENTER ALL OF THE FEDERAL RULINGS AS MY PROOF AS THEY ARE LIKE SIGNED CONFESSIONS. THEY PROVE ONLY ME, THE PEOPLE WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CORRECT APPLICATION OF THE LAW UPON READING MY CASE AND 9 SCOTUS JUSTICE ARE INNOCENT.
NO MATTER HOW OR WHY IT HAPPENED, AS THE CLERKS CHANGED THE NAME OF MY CASE OR AS I INFORMED THE SG, THE SITTING OFFICERS DEFAULTING WAS A BLESSING - IF YOU TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT. IN EFFECT THE CURRENT SG WAIVED THE US AUTHORITY THUS AWARDED IT OT A COURT OUTSIDE THE US SUCH AS THE WORLD COURT. THUS ALL PEOPLE WOULD THEN OBEY THAT COURT AND ENFORCE THOSE RULINGS. WHY? HOW? EASY: THE US FINALLY HAD A CASE GO TO THE WORLD COURT, GONZALES OF CASTLEROCK V GONZALES. HER ATTORNEY ARGUE HER CASE INCORRECTLY IN SCOTUS AND IN WORLD COURT. ME? I’LL ARGUE IT CORRECTLY! THUS AUTHORITY THEN WOULD BE THE WORLD COURT NOT SCOTUS AS IT IS THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY STATING: WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF OBEYING THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT, THE PEOPLE, WHILE THE WORLD COURT WOULD BE SAYING AS THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERNMENT THEN WE WILL OBEY THEM AS THEY ARE ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION. DO YOU REALIZE WHAT IT WOULD MEAN FOR THE WORLD TO ACKNOWLEDGE MY AUTHORITY THUS THE PEOPLE’S AUTHORITY UPON DISCOVERING BVG IS A TIE RATHER THAN THE US DEALING WITH IT ON THEIR OWN? IT WON’T BE PRETTY AND THEN THE US LOSES OUT ON MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS THEY WOULD NO LONGER OWN THE ADVANTAGE IF I GAVE IT TO THE WORLD FIRST. As for Paul Zoss: I said over and over that he can’t know something. I can know it but he can’t. I did something only Jesus is so I can know it, as if I have miraculous powers when I do not. I wasn’t born with it like Jesus so I had to act to become it thus it often seems as if I possess ESP and the power of miracles when really it is physics – law – and our two governing documents - law - state it exactly so as I tested it I then can know what Zoss and all officers do not. As I knew federal judges would be reduced to writing exact lies, “insufficient fact” and “no arguable basis” as if women have been accorded legal power and moral authority since day one or as if I am defective while he, a federal judge, is not? As if to imply that as a federal judge he is smarter than I am (better than) and so more able and capable so that the casual observer would accept his WRITTEN word as fact and never investigate? I outfoxed him by pre-empting him: 129
The reason I’ll clean house in world court is that not only is the planet hot to embarrass the US but that Jessica Gonzales had her day in federal court as she was not forever pro se as she had a lawyer. A lawyer then took her case to the world court and not as an authority case but regardless she made an appearance in person in the federal court while I have not. That alone would cause me to win but so would something else: Paul Zoss would have to have lived my entire life with me thus be an eyewitness to history – he would have to have been at every event ever that I was present for since born – and he was not. As he was not there how can he know? He can’t and as he is acting as a federal judge while Obama acts as president legal or not we all know A Summary View, The Declaration, The Revolution, The Constitution, Marbury V Madison and Bush V Gore happened. All Marbury V Madison is? The fact of Marbury’s life along with the US’ life, or it’s fact is American history. It’s fact is the law of the US. BVG is an authority case: I knew it so I knew the law and the law is changing the case caption to two individuals then opened the door for every citizen who knew to then sue to become the President as US law is the art of becoming. Take short cuts like Obama and you never become the authority even if you sit. Take the longest, hardest, most difficult road imaginable? Then you become the authority; you wholly embody it and you own that knowledge as a part of your person. Whenever Obama needed to he changed his spots; he’s been all things – one at a time - to all people. Whenever a hand up helped him out then he took it. How many favors got him where he is? Lots and lots. Nobody is shy about hiding this. A phone call will get him into Harvard? Obama took it. Me? I said no thanks I’ll do it on my own so now I’m blacker than Obama will ever be as I overcame what those people still face and I even have an answer for the firefighters and others who can’t seem to overcome the obstacle their selves. I molded myself in the image of my creators as I not once thought of myself as being above the law and then not even the rules as I did comply as much as humanly possible. And: I could have gone to the world court long ago but waited as that is one of the worst things we can do as a nation so it needs to be my last resort – after SCOTUS as we have zero evidence the Justices ever saw my case and won’t until an other federal court like this one enters us in person or after this court once again caves to fear thus refuses us entry to our own court building that we paid for and now pay to run. If this court rules ONLY lawyers, crooks and foreigners have the 130
vested right and vested interest to appear in person when I did what no other American ever did? Then we go to world court, the worst-case scenario for the officers but not for the People. I’ll be first to go there w/o any appearance in person at all in the federal court, not after I exhausted the states and their “highest” courts and not even after I won on paper! Thus: I was kept out only as I am honest and only as I won. So, you fault and punish me – injure me - as only I am intelligent enough to have known and then am fearless enough to have acted? As I make you FEEL less than or as you have an inferiority complex, as if you’re sexist? Or as you fear any repercussions by the parties or privateers as they will not be happy their dirty little secrets are exposed? I entered ALL of US history to the record and then all of world history to the court record as I can and may as I am an American and Americans made it possible for me to do this as what I entered was the Iroquois confederacy which is over 800 years old plus a photograph of the Earth as taken by men, American men, looking back at Earth from the moon thus I entered the entire world or all humanity. If you weren’t born here then you may not do this. You can try it but is it admissible? Nope as your citizens did not make the lunar landing possible and then you had to actually land on a body in space not the Earth. I told the SCOTUS clerks: Here as somebody is going to try to claim I did not enter a fact and we all know it is not possible to enter every fact of humanity from day one in Eden and all I ever had to enter was the fact of the US – US law - and my life not yours. That very attachment was entered to this court so how can Zoss reasonably say insufficient fact if I did enter it all, as even if you discount this then I still entered much more than any licensed lawyer is asked to enter, and how does Zoss know I entered insufficient fact if he never met me in person and so can’t know some fact? Feelings and emotions are a fact of the person speaking. No lawyer can ever know my feeling and emotion as fact. Only I can know it. Zoss? Even if he was with me for every moment of my life did he and I have the same exact feeling and emotion at the same time? Paul Zoss can never, ever know my feeling and
emotion as fact; he cannot testify that he had cause to claim “insufficient fact” as to know that he then had to ask me! Zoss never could deny that motion as SCOTUS granted it and in such a way it is permanent – did not NY even come around to certifying me ‘forever pro se’ AFTER the SCOTUS action? YES thus the poor persons motion is forever as NOTHING in our law says the acting, legal Chief Justice and/or President must be a licensed lawyer so SUSAN HERBERT may act in her own defense and in defense of The People if only one other person reviews all fact and law plus the correct application and sides with her thus choosing her as their representative and one did as I received one legal vote plus I then received the support of others – in person – and then even millions over the internet. Susan can know Zoss motivation and intent and she can know his feelings as to become an authority case? Susan had to heal the injury Zoss still suffers from thus as Susan is a constant then any and all people not acting according to the letter of the law and/or its spirit will be easily detected and I warned Zoss but he still went here. As I do not possess ESP how and why did I know to legally claim in preparation for an appearance in world court that other federal judges would try to cite insufficient fact? I did what any actual constitutional authority does: I overcame all irrational fear. Fear as unconstitutional; even Jesus says those who stand in the face of all fear will win. FEAR is what all humans base their decisions upon and you may ask any expert as psychologists will tell you this. A federal judge might act as he fears no consequence or he might act as he fears all consequence. It matters not. FEAR is what was inserted into us as humans in Eden as fear causes false guilt, shame over what is not our fault. Even felt shame thus fear; Adam felt blame thus fear. Our emotional compass became skewed as we violated universal economic truth: Avoid the apple and all benefit as in avoid the office of executive and all benefit. If you hold the one thing you want out as a reason not to attack it itself then all win. But once a person decides to go after that one thing? We all lose. Eden was a safety issue, a safety issue we lived out over in with the second fall, BVG. Only this time as I knew the results of Even in Eden I took another bite as “free will” is a corruption as will is
never free as will is what people not animals have. It’s like “willpower” as there’s no such thing! Will is moral authority not legal power. And physical force? The original separation of powers in Eden is physical strength and childbirth. Men must learn not to take whatever they want via physical force and women must learn never to do whatever they are told to do via threat of physical force but to reason and decide on their own. Federal judges? They must learn never to take whatever they want via force as it is force if you do it without any reason but a selfish reason. US law is about UNSELFISH or SELFLESS love not selfishness that is why everybody is to be welcomed at the table. That is why I will always and forever have the means to know what other people cannot know and to defeat titles and money who are not the constitutionally set government of the US as my motivations and intentions are pure: Unconditional love for self and nation or Philadelphia, brotherly love. Paul Zoss is a grown man with all the privileges and advantages he could ever want or need. Nobody needs to worry about him as he can worry about himself. He can take care of himself. I can ask him one question so then the people will know his truth as fact and so Zoss must now decide: Are you Adam? Are you going to blame me when asked? or are you finally going to admit to the truth that Adam could not, that you did it because you could and because you wanted to do it – for whatever reason – as nobody held a gun to your head and forced you to do it. Or will Zoss make Adam’s mistake all over again? All Adam and Eve ever had to do to escape punishment is: Tell the truth! God said he unconditionally loved them but they did not believe it! They tested it as you test any law, as you test any parent. He said he could forgive anything but that if they ate the apple there were consequences and if they lied there were consequences as once they ate that apple? IGNORANCE IS NOT AN EXCUSE! Once you eat that apple, get that law license, than you are agreeing to play by the court rules not by law to then gain entry to then argue law in person so Susan does no need to meet those rules; for her entry should be automatic as she met an even higher standard: The SCOTUS bar as she not only gained entry but won thus no other federal judge may then deny her motions or her appearance in person. Would Susan enter a frivolous or abusive motion? No, all she entered 133
was the poor person’s motion as a courtesy to the clerks as their rules often say they may not file a case without it. It was never to be JUDGED by anyone as Susan already proved herself to be the equal of a Founder, an original Founder. Once you sit as a federal judge? You’re an expert; like Susan knows this you are to know it. You have zero excuse expect: I was afraid. That’s the only actual reason as nobody cares what you are afraid of only that you tell the truth. The exactly named Creator told me a joke as I lived in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, as in tell the truth or else as some consequences are not within our control, and way back in 1996 I knew I was to look in Hawaii, that somehow someway Hawaii would become very, very important in my life as would a lie about Hawaii or that maybe Hawaiians would lie about themselves as like New Mexico they are often thought of as being less than or not a real state. I almost went to college at the University of Hawaii, my mother has a connection to Hawaii, and the Mormons are still in Hawaii while the lepers are not and there I was in Truth or Consequences, NM, staring right at Hawaii when it should have been impossible. The Creator was ‘pinging’ me; would I ping the Creator back? You bet as “sincerity”, “honesty’ and “authenticity” are feelings and emotions so when I feel the Creator or the universe as I have an exact feeling when I slam into the truth headfirst? I ping it back; it’s how I came to own my bound copy of the Constitution; it’s how several thousand facts all came to line up in my life. I will bring the proof with me into court as can any other person claim they set out to prove the exactly named Creator was reality in a court of law to then be able to make the case for the equality of all humans and when they did they happened to find out 12 years beforehand that a legal situation was brewing whereby the office would come to be open to any and all takers and that person claiming to be Hawaiian would masquerade among us and that due to Hawaii’s inferiority complex its agents not its people would be more than happy to play along? That even then, before it came to be, the Creator had Hawaii and all actual Americans, especially those Natural born, in its hand and so safely delivered the evidence and proof to the one person who could and would mount a defense on her behalf and then on behalf of all people even Paul Zoss? No, not one other person can make this claim and then prove it. I first began making this case at age 5 when I exchanged one life for another, as I needed proof that the Creator was real or I was going to die and I knew it. If awarded this 134
one life I swore to act in defense of humanity as I would always know God was reality and as exchanging exact lives is not equal and exchanging my own for theirs was pointless as what good is that if I am then dead so then can’t return anything to God? Acting in defense of humanity was the biggest thing I could think of as the moon is my sense of self as I was almost exactly 18 months old, the age we acquire our sense of self, when that happened. I never, ever went back on that promise once and I never will as today I know: I, Susan, entered a contract with the Creator. Who ever knew he listened and took us up on the offer? Exactly? All of you should know as how else do you reason your own existence as a nation of People? If you need me to prove the documents are elegant thus reveal the elegant application of the law then I will but when I do? You’ll know the truth – the Creator did choose us after we first chose ourselves as the Hopi say – and so you’ll never have any excuse to violate the law again as then you will forever know what I know – if you do you only harm yourself first before harming any other person – as every American citizen is Forever pro se and forever pro bono. No matter what the paper says.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.