Latest version of Sioux City complaint; mailed Friday, 1/15/10.

I named a
judge within this court, Zoss, for asking The People to pay him and Obama
tribute and for writing exact lies in his ruling and order. And NO, you are not
reading a threat, as all I did was cite the correct application of the law: 1 st you
dissolve the legal bonds and then you abolish the dead institutions. At least
three elements needed to constitute a threat are missing; this never
constitutes a threat. Plus: The authorities who are no longer legal, named
authorities due to their default on 11/05/08 would first have to establish they
possess a constitutional basis to act and to do that? They have to prove
Barack Obama was and is duly elected as he qualifies and we all know – he
is not as he does not.

I, Susan Herbert, complain:

1. I was born on December 30th,1967.

2. Every single solitary right was violated until I was murdered.

3. I survived my death. Every court is denying The People, represented by

my person, an appearance in person. I happen to be one of The People,
forced to become the authority as not one person could or would make the
case for women. I’m also forced to enter over 100 pages as male judges
keep lying and claiming the Declaration, Revolution, Constitution and 19th
Amendment, Bush V Gore and In Re Susan Herbert 08-6622 do not exist -
American history never happened - thus I entered insufficient fact and no
arguable basis. A lie. Federal judges seem to believe if they write it then it
is never a lie and/or a crime. Wrong, so you see the conundrum: A conflict
exists equality does not.

4. The crimes committed against my person and my children’s persons

include attempted rape, robbery, assault, battery, child abuse, emotional
abuse, starvation and the criminal denial of my right to vote. THE VOTE,
the founding cause.

5. Every officer of this nation participated as did every citizen with the most
heinous acts of all committed by the Judiciary of this nation. Do the fact checking
yourself as my name is all over the record of this nation state and federal. Judges
knew exact dates, names, times and places and then chose to participate or to

1
aid and abet the perpetrators in order to protect personal, disgusting, selfish
interests. I do not care what their reason is as nobody can ever claim they had
any legal reason so anything that comes out of their mouth or their pen except
exact truth is a federal crime that now escalates to treason as I am the one and
only citizen to outwit the federal vampires by:

6. Authoring a Supreme Court petition, a case of constitutional authority and

original jurisdiction that overturns another such case, Bush V Gore, as it is
bad case and was entered and decided wrongly. MY petition is pro se
unlike any other authority case thus it meets the strictest standard of all:
HISTORY. No opinion, no suggestion, no doubt whatsoever. Police
reports, hospital reports, court reports, Navy records, school records - you
name it - with first person eyewitness testimony of the events. A living
witness to back every report up, as that is then indisputable,
incontrovertible, absolute proof. HISTORY. You know what else it
contained? The Declaration and Constitution.

7. Susan Herbert then became the one and only American with the power
and authority to kill a federal judge and then never spend a single day in
jail as no criminal prosecution is possible as Susan had an idea: If I need
to kill a federal judge or any other federal agent in order to then secure
justice, how do I do it in such a way that it constitutes self-defense and
national defense thus a Revolution? I knew: Author a petition to SCOTUS
as natural birth is our means to then wage war as we were born in war so
that when SCOTUS directly acts upon it then is exactly what the
Declaration is: It constitutes service; it dissolves the bonds thus I may now
shoot and kill a federal judge.

8. Bad news Sioux City: not one judge objected. Not one. You had three
chances and not one of you did anything. A Justice can’t lift a finger to
help you. You know what a Justice has to do? Sit back and wait for me to
shoot. You act upon the document thus making it real. All I had to was
engage SCOTUS until SCOTUS acted w/o the US ever responding as that
then is my permission to fire, as once SCOTUS does that? It has
acknowledged the contract is breached and the federal judiciary did it
when they had zero reason other than profit, whether it was money,
comfort or flattery.

2
9. Here’s a fact to consider: You’re a Founder only it’s 2007 not 1776. There
is utter lawlessness as a president committed perjury but was not
convicted, a president was installed in violation of the law and a foreign
man was installed to make the injury to women permanent, women have a
right to die only and forever, but not to life as our vote has never had any
legal power and will never as we were kept out of the offices of Chief
Justice and Executive. We have a right to war against the institutions to
abolish them, so how do I dissolve the bonds to then take out that first
constitution as my judgment is it is dead, as dead as the institution?

10. Go ahead, try me, as you know as fact that The People have a right to war
against the government if it is unjust. John Marshall said that day was
here when redress for the violation of a fully vested right was made
impossible. Maybe you’re not smart enough to do it and maybe you’re not
courageous enough to do it and maybe you’re not wiling even if you could
but I am. I actually wrote: ‘I want and need justice so I will kill a federal
judge.’ I wrote a lot of things. I made certain SCOTUS knew this is it. If
federal judges are the reason, the single reason that justice is no more?
You restore justice by going to a Justice, telling him or her you’re taking
out a judge and then when you do? Justice is again. Get it? You enter
SCOTUS directly, direct action is taken, you leave w/o remedy and relief
so then you claim it your self by acting upon your declaration: You act to
kill a federal judge. Your action then is proof. Revolution as when they try
to haul you into court? The justices had to read what I wrote as only a
Justice can address an emergency application and as mine was acted
upon by John Roberts? John Roberts said, “Susan is correct.” His
ACTION or his agent’s action is the proof. He can’t grant or award me
your death; to be a legal act of war upon the government, dissolution and
then abolishment, I write the petition up and I act upon it once Roberts
signs it as we will hang separately or together. His action is his signature.
Petition 08-6622, 11/20/08, the day the death warrant was signed. All that
matters is it is directly entered and acted upon and then I’m liberated to do
it.

11. If he granted anything it then is paper and that’s no good. The Founders
served Britain. Then what? The King did not accord them any paper. The
Declaration was it. It’s signed; it’s delivered; now they act upon it. As I do
not have any king then WHO do I serve? John Roberts. Roberts says:

3
 The die is cast; Susan must submit or triumph. No matter how it came to
be all I had to do was prove the Republic fell and then force SCOTUS via
emergency application to address the breach of contract.

12. When SCOTUS denied 07-9804 I had them: “You violated Marbury thus I
have you as you just reasoned yourself out of existence.” Those clerks
promised to “sink” the case thus suppressing the fact of what they did to
me and my kids. They told me my life was worth nothing. Now I had them.
I then entered 08-6622 directly as you can’t and may not violate Marbury;
it’s claiming no woman can ever, ever secure redress and/or actual justice
and then claiming no person can ever act pro se w/o a law license thus it
violates several dozen prior SCOTUS rulings. Proof: Carhart, Castlerock
and Schiavo: No justice and Carhart and Schiavo ruled wrongly not in
error. No justice for women even if you do secure redress as they NEED
to hear me in person as only I can do that. I’m the case. no other person
ever will have the case for women no matter how hard you look. You’ll get
ruling after ruling and never secure justice as you’ll never have the correct
application for every point at once. You have to cover at least 25
applications, all equal protection and due process.

13. 08-6622 enters directly with zero lower court activity. Upon denial? I
inform the clerks: “If you did this you might fry as you just signed your own
death warrant. Violate Marbury and still offer no relief? You plead guilty
once you placed it on the case conference list as you MUST have merit to
get there and so one Justice was supposed to read it. Did they? It matters
not. The Justices at fault if the clerks are wrecking people’s lives and even
killing them. If you’re summarizing these cases and so bad cases and
even noncases are entering? Where are the Justices and why do they not
know this? I know why: I happen to be the smartest person on the planet
right now. Go ahead: Give me anything you got and you still won’t beat
me.”

14. NY State interfered – they illegally heard a family court action filed while
08-6622 was being heard – in order to hide what the county and appellate
court did. Those involved thought they could injure me in such a way
they’d incapacitate me. I used NY instead. I managed to get Linda Griffin
to certify me “forever pro se” after NY couldn’t find a lawyer as every
lawyer that touched it knew something criminal and sinister went on in my

4
 case. Griffin went so far as to phone a lawyer and convince her I was
GUILTY – there’s no such thing in family court - and then try to assign her
to me. The lawyer ‘fessed up when I pointed something out to her:
“Someone convinced you that I’m guilty as what you are saying never
happened. If I did what you keep claiming why wasn’t I arrested? You
keep saying I did it. Yes, I did, but if the REASON is that reason why
wasn’t I arrested? My REASON was not that reason. Now, can you defend
a person whom you truly believe is guilty and when guilt is not an issue in
family court?” She fell out. You can and may do something that MIGHT be
illegal depending upon your reason. So her told her that reason, which is
not written down anywhere? The judge phoned her. Gotcha!

15. In 08-6622’s ‘rehearing’ I informed SCOTUS (not exact words): “I am now

“forever pro se”, a first ever legal designation. That means NY decided
that for all eternity I will be my own lawyer as not one person ever will be
able to represent me. Correct, as only I was there for all events being
discussed in court filings. No other person, as they are third parties, was
there for it all and no attorney was. That solves a problem. Every state
would ignore or deny all fact and then even all law as MY ATTORNEY
entered it not me. The third parties entered zero evidence, zero proof and
no case law and won over my airtight, rock solid case, as judges played
games and took money. Now it’s all history, first person eyewitness
testimony. You, the clerks and judges, are now guilty. I may shoot. Go and
do it: Deny my kids are not with me; deny the Revolution happened; deny
that Obama was illegally elected or that he’s a lawyer, that he he signed
511 or he’s a foreigner. As you refuse to believe I am smarter than you are
then you will get a rude awakening.” And they did! The clerks took up and
Article 3 argument to avoid having to do what they must, what they are
compelled under our law. So then when they wrote me an official letter
citing Article 3 as their excuse not to their duty, a reason they could, would
and did violate the Constitution, an excuse that always worked before, I
answered their argument::

16. “You just cited Article 3. Okay: The legal conundrum no person could ever
get around to address the Judiciary is Article 3. You had to be able to
equal yourself to the Chief Justice and President with one vote i.e.
Executive order. You obeyed my Executive Order thus acknowledged it as
legal and binding in both 07-9804 & 08-6622. Now you said that you

5
 CAN’T act due to Article 3. You found me in violation of article 3. Nope.
You can and may act; you’re not going to as you have always used this
excuse and it always worked as no pother person could ever overturn a
case of o.j. As you know the one and only thing you may not do is fail to
act? You’re guilty not me. What I did to you was level the filed by equating
you to me as a VOTER a lone citizen. You keep saying, “I’m a clerk not a
voter.” And that my friend is a violation of EP&DP. We’re both voters; we
both have one vote. You keep saying, “No I’m a clerk. I have more than
one vote thus do not have to do this only as I’m a clerk.” Why and how are
you different than me? As you’re a man? A clerk? The law is zero favor
and zero special privileges. The minute those clerks or the Justices denied
me they then came tumbling down. They became citizens only as I came
to be around or outside of Article 3. If I have to do it, it’s an absolute duty,
then you have to do it. As they actually sent me a letter citing Article 3 to
then avoid it as they knew it was as fact w/o question criminal? I am
golden.

17. IF THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT PROTECT ME THEN IT DOES NOT

FIND ME. You CAN’T cite Article 3. You CAN’T deny any motions. Oh,
you can try. You can write it down. But then I’ll keep a list and when the
commission is finally adjudicated? You’ll fry for treason. I’ll act to make the
commission real - I’ll shoot - and so you’ll try to criminally charge me. You
won’t be able to; it’ll go all the way back to SCOTUS. You will have to
admit “she told us all of this and we did this” or “We refused to believe that
she could outsmart us”. You decided to deny me and my kids any and all
protection of the law. You then colluded and conspired to harm us, and
then all women and children, together or alone.

18. A copy of an actual letter I sent to SCOTUS, to the clerks and Roberts:

“The Justices and clerks of the Supreme Court may not cite Article 3 of the
Constitution as a reason to commit what is a crime. No law, US case law,
precedent, code, rule, or legal policy exists to protect the employees of the
Supreme Court and/or grant them blanket immunity nor does the Supreme Court
have a fully vested interest or right to invoke the law as weapon in its defense. By
its very nature if the Supreme Court of the United States is now in a position
whereby it must use the Constitution to defend itself it is admitting it has
committed criminal acts as there is no other reason this Court would ever need to

6
invoke Article 3. It is being invoked to avoid what is a duty and to avoid accepting
responsibility for past actions; it is being invoked against me and so against the
law and not in support of the law or it’s spirit. Three times the Supreme Court had
an opportunity to obey the law and to preserve it; all three times the Supreme
Court instead chose to do the one thing John Marshall said the Supreme Court
could never, ever do or else this nation would then be an unjust, lawless and
dead nation: Deny a living person redress.

SCOTUS may cite Article 3 in any other case save my own as I am unique and
have received unique treatment not in accordance with any legal action
undertaken in the US since our founding. SCOTUS treated me uniquely and
there is zero reason for it other than what is false, manufactured, discriminatory,
sexist, prejudiced and meant to protect employees of SCOTUS at the expense of
this nation. It is now creating a brand new impossible standard: In order for a
person who is not qualified to hold the office of Executive to be of the ability to
then purchase the office of the Executive money and favor had to trade hands
over and over from the lone citizens up to the Executive thus all offices under it
are already sold. If a lower court existed in accordance with federal law the
breach would not have occurred, as it would not be possible. I cannot go to a
court that does not exist. You do recall SCOTUS did not exist for any woman
arguing her own case or injury, nonlawyer, ethical citizen or my one person until I
my own self created it by suing for breach?

This Court may be of the mistaken belief that John Marshall’s application of US
law is that it may act upon the knowledge contained in an emergency application
that is a breach of contract suit for liability but then not file the suit itself. This
Court, by acting on 11/20/08 to circumvent the Solicitor General aka the people
and so enter the suit directly but never file it then: 1, Admitted the emergency
exists; 2, Acknowledged the litigant made her case; 3; Committed what is coup;
4, Acted against the person who is the legal authority while protecting those in
violation of the law, or, chose personal interest that our not our law; 5, Did
nothing to stop crimes already in progress. The Supreme Court acted as if the
law did not apply to its own persons nor did Marbury V Madison, that is, it acted
as if in the case of Susan Herbert alone, it could ignore the Declaration,
Constitution, Marbury and the rules. If it does apply to Susan than it does apply
to SCOTUS; if it does not apply to Susan it does not apply to SCOTUS. It’s
RECIPROCAL not arbitrary. If you want to be able to cite the Constitution you
cannot violate it.

7
John Marshall clearly said: If the day ever dawns whereby a litigant who is a
voter or natural born citizen makes it to the office of Chief Justice seeking
redress for the violation of fully vested protected rights but is denied entry in
person the US has become a nation of unjust men and not a nation of law.

Unless treason and overthrow has already occurred under no other conditions
would the Supreme Court be invoking Article 3 against any citizen who has a pro
se case of constitutional authority in which the sitting but not legal President and
Chief Justice is named so then the Supreme Court is acting to stand down this
authority and strip all legal power and moral authority from this person in a
treasonous manner. TREASONOUS as: all clerks owned the knowledge since
early 2007 .

Nothing grants the Supreme Court legal power other than their one vote, a vote
the employees of this court willingly, knowingly and deliberately gave away as we
know they all voted in this last election when it was being held against the law,
when it constituted treason and after this Court refused to obey, uphold and
enforce the law of the US and further not only violated Marbury but breached
both governing contracts in order to deny a living person, me, redress of rights
that had fully vested and are constitutionally protected. At the time I first pressed
suit treason had not occurred. This court cannot now claim it did not know as I
am pro se. My petitions or first person testimony is fact not allegation and not
hearsay. I informed this court that a coup is papery or bloody and that it was
acting to support this coup that was then underway. I informed this court if it
allowed my unique and not legal treatment to continue w/o redress in person and
then the 08 election to go forward then a situation would, as fact, develop that
might become one that was beyond the control of myself or this Court; that is if
what I knew to be happening was not checked the Supreme Court might find
itself in a situation whereby it could do nothing other than to witness this nation
implode.

Unfortunately for myself and for the citizens who did not participate in this
atrocious, outrageous and unconscionable behavior the worst case scenario has
arrived. I, at one time, told this Court that it may no longer cite any lesser
authority than Marbury; I was being generous by allowing it to cite Marbury as I
truly believed this court could not know something. My belief has changed as
conditions have changed. I will make an attempt to reason with you but
apparently SCOTUS is not willing as David Souter proves so that I now believe

8
the court has no intention of ever obeying the law or Marbury in my case and that
is a problem as my case is the Declaration and Constitution:

SCOTUS threw its own rules out in my case as I made my legal argument. They
did exactly what I said they had to do: Start rejecting me or returning documents
or injuring me based upon the Constitution as this a constitutional authority case.
I’m the authority not you as all you cite is code, rule or policy that does not apply
and never did in my case. This letter is SCOTUS saying: Argue this – Art. 3 –
against Congress when you come back. I argue it and Congress will win. The
Supreme Court MAY NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT OR ARGUE AGAINST ME FOR
WHAT IT CAUSED: LAWLESSNESS.

Congress cited Resolution 511 as law by turning rule into law w/o anybody
knowing. HOW? It sent 511 to the House Judiciary Committee who UPHELD IT
AS LAW, AS LEGAL, MAKING OBAMA PRESIDENT VIA A DIRECT ACT OF
CONGRESS IN VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF EVERY SINGLE ETHICAL
CITIZEN ALIVE! It especially harms women and exactly me. IT MADE A LAW
THAT APPLIES TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ONLY AS IN ONLY MEMBERS
OF CONGRESS MAY BREAK THE LAW AND ONLY MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS MAY BECOME PRESIDENT. BUT IT MADE IT A LAW BY NOT
TAKING A VOTE BUT INSTEAD SENDING IT TO THE JUDICIARY
COMMITTEE WHO MADE NO OBJECTION!!!! THUS IT NOW IS LAW VIA A
DIRECT VOTE OF THE PEOPLE NOT A 3/4 VOTE OF CONGRESS. Now –

If Congress took that ¾ vote would any sane American give ALL POWER to
CONGRESS and ZERO POWER TO THE PEOPLE, TO THE EXECUTIVE OR
TO THE JUDICIARY??? Would women or any citizen vote for a law that
effectively makes it IMPOSSIBLE for any person to become the President ever
unless she is a member of Congress, a Democrat or a Republican, a crook and
unless she waits for him to drop dead as she can only get to VP and no higher as
CONGRESS is a male majority??? And now always will be??? Just as SCOTUS
will be? SCOTUS has been effectively killed; it is now dead in the water.
CONGRESS controls it. Nothing it now decides is actually SCOTUS acting
independently but CONGRESS acting though SCOTUS. Obama’s first
appointment is the stake in SCOTUS’ heart. Rulings out of SCOTUS are
arbitrarily obeyed or ignored. Now? As Souter has perfect timing? Too perfect?
Anytime Congress or any private interest wants to act it merely uses the House
Judiciary Committee instead of the actual, legal process.

9
Congress glass ceiling’ed all of us even John Roberts with nasty lawyer tricks
and I’m the only one who did not buy it. House committees have RULE not law.
This effectively made a House Ruling a LAW.

This letter proves my claim: The law has been over thrown as it no longer exists
as it no longer applies to MEN who are not members of Congress. MOB RULE IS
NOW THE ‘LAW’ WITH THE MOB BEING CONGRESS.

SCOTUS could not adequately defend itself against Congress as the law no
longer exists for them as men who are ethical as when the Solicitor General of
the US waived the right of all citizens even the clerks and Justices of this court
as no objection was made as that objection takes the form of setting that woman
or possible recipient’s case for oral argument. I never asked for a purple heart
but I got one, didn’t I? I sacrificed myself on the altar known as SCOTUS as you
were supposed to get a clue: In the bible? The man never kills the woman or the
baby; he stops at the last second as God is trying to get him over an emotional
hurdle: to do God’s will not his own. You kept on slaughtering us. Seriously, it is
like being at Tenochtitlan in 1500. I’m waiting for the SCOTUS steps to turn red. I
told you: Only God can kill the innocent as an act of God is just that and not an
act of SCOTUS. Why am I being asked to repeat it? To die, survive, die and
survive again? BECAUSE YOU MISTAKENLY BELIEVE I CANNOT. And now
that I have? Another woman can steal my argument.

If there’s no process and no protection Marshall said: Come to SCOTUS directly.

I believe you do not personally like it that a girl made it here first. ONLY A GIRL
CAN MAKE THIS CASE! Not may but can. Did a single citizen ever tell a soldier:
You are frivolous and delusional as we are not at war and never were here or
abroad? Pay an unjust tax and/or tribute and violate the honor bond or else
DENIED AND DISMISSED! No soldier and no Commander ever suffered that as
that is insanity.

I’m not insane.

I can argue Article 3 but if I do? Congress wins and is rewarded for its
unconscionable actions as Congress finally found a way around SCOTUS and
the it seems as if it is permanent. As SCOTUS is now aiding and abetting them,
against its own self. Didn’t I ask you WHO harms his own self?

10
WHO does a clerk or Justice complain to if their rights are violated, a criminal act
is committed against them or if it is made impossible for them to secure justice
for their own person or a family member? There is only one person: The sitting
President or the people. Congress eliminated those two options. The Justice
Department can do nothing. The AG can do nothing. A US attorney can do
nothing. The law or the US case law i.e. precedent would have to exist and it
does not as of 11/20/08 nor does the vested interest or right as of April 2008.
You refused to hear the case, remember? RECIPROCAL MEANS YOU
PROTECT ME & I PROTECT YOU; YOU HARM ME & I’LL GET A PACK OF
CITIZENS TO HARM YOU. They’ll volunteer as always to march on DC. People
charged with the duty to uphold the law cannot by its very nature be in violation
of it on their way into office. It causes actual mobs to form. I predict pitchforks,
torches ’n all.

This would be WHY mob rule is bad and not good. A mob is a mob is a mob. You
can call it Congress; i know a mob when I see, hear and feel one.

I have changed my mind: A Chief Justice may not act but refuse to file the paper
and fail to hear the case orally or in person only as it contains details about him
and other criminal activity afoot in the federal government. Why, that would make
our chief a crook! John Marshall said if we ever got to the point where even one
American citizen, a voter, was denied their right of redress at this level, Chief
Justice, then we were a nation of unjust men and not of law. We now know the
nation is run by unjust men. The only reason not to file that case? So that people
would never know I went up against John Roberts and won. If you best the Chief
Justice that makes you President. All that matters is me owning the knowledge
and acting upon it. Other people will soon own it too. Or so I told NY.

I leveraged NY against PA as NY cannot enter a contract with PA unless PA

informs it and gets consent. The judge refused to call NY. How can PA then
make NY a party? I told NY: “To prove whom actually unselfishly loved these
kids? And that the states are guilty as well as the individuals? When these third
parties threatened to murder me and my children and told me that they would
hound me until I dropped dead of old age if nothing else I invoked the wisdom of
Solomon. I let them go. I told my PA attorney to tell their attorney that I wanted to
cut my children in half. I said, “Ask them to keep legal action in PA but the kids in
NY as we all know they never lived a day in PA after November of 1998. They
left PA and went into NY; Cate Austin’s own father even said visits began around

11
December of 1998 and that’s in the court record so they lied to the NY state
police and Albany County Court in MAY JUNE and JULY of 1999, a full five
moths later. Ask to divide custody as in one state has legal custody but another
has physical custody as that then is a federal case. What kind of judge pretends
he can’t count to 12 and agrees to cut a living child in half and what mother goes
along with it?” The Austins, PA & NY, that’s who. And they made it a contract that
became an order of the PA court. Did NY agree or did PA order this without NY’s
permission and w/o NY knowing? Did PA call NY and ask NY “Can we, PA, split
custody two ways so you get the kids physically but we get them legally?” ? Can
NY be made to enter a contract against its will and w/o knowing if CATE AND
DAVID AUSTIN, CHARLES & DAPHNE HERBERT & A LAWYER NAMED
ARNOLD WEINSTEIN WHO HOLDS A PA LICENSE DO THE NEGOTIATING
ON NY’S BEHALF AND THEY DO NOT HAVE THAT POWER AS NOBODY
ELECTED THEM, THREE OF THEM ARE NOT RESIDENTS OR NY VOTERS,
NOBODY INVOLVED AT THAT TIME HOLDS A NY LICENSE AS CATE
FAILED HER TEST TWICE AND IT IS NAMED NOWHERE IN NY’S
CONSTITUTION OR IN THE US CONSTITUTION? Nope. Seems to me NY may
have an ax to grind against PA and Linda Griffin as my attorney argued this
contract as invalid, on the Austin’s part as it never occurred to her PA cannot
make NY a party w/o informing NY and getting NY’s consent as in calling Albany
County and asking Albany County for consent on NY’s behalf because Albany
already said NY DOES NOT CONSENT. I asked the judge to call NY. He said
No, he could read but FIVE judges then came and went in only a few months as
Susan was on to them in PA. BTW: In Griffin’s own court they said that my kids
moved to NY in MAY so in JULY of 1999 they lied under oath to the Albany Court
and lied to state police who I sent to their home to prove my kids were living in
NY not in PA. CAN THE THIRD DISTRICT APPELLATE COUNT TO 12? AS
MAY ALWAYS COMES BEFORE JULY. HOW THEN IS IT TRUTH AND FACT
TO TELL NY IN JULY THAT MY KIDS DO NOT LIVE IN NY BUT THEN TELL
LINDA GRIFFIN THEY DID LIVE IN NY THEN, AS THEY CAME IN MAY? IF
THEY DID NOT TELL THIS LIE WHY THEN DID THE STATE POLICE NOT
REMOVE THEM? THEY TOLD THE STATE POLICE MY KIDS WERE VISITING
NY BUT DID LIVE IN PA THUS JURISDICTION WAS PA NOT NY, THE SAME
LIE THEY TOLD ALBANY COUNTY. So how then did NY come to be involved?
PA made or forced NY to be a party; the third parties then committed crimes to
enforce it. Hell, I would have told NY in October of 2005: NY, PA violated the
Constitution, both yours and the US’ if somebody did not find Greg Rinckey and
ask him or otherwise assign him to my case…Now, Is agreeing to cut a child in

12
half no matter how you do it enough proof of injury, proof of harm and proof of
death for the third district???”

It is a matter of time before this directly harms you, as I do not control that. THE
GOD controls physics. I only define it for you. God or this universe is always on
the side of truth and righteousness. A Court and its Chief not filing the case only
as a girl beat them is not what God wants as an all male universe cannot exist at
some future point. See what happened to an all male government? It imploded. I
know you feel as if, you believe you control the universe, but you do not. The
decsions you make each day? God is not suprised by any of them and can
counter them. I told you: A sort of homeostasis goes on. The universe respires
exactly like a person; it thinks. An intelligent designer can plan for you. These
days I know when SCOTUS is up to no good in my case: Actual chains start
rattling.

Then the mailman knocks.

Susan.

19. I pitted myself against the ENTIRE federal government, every citizen and
officer. I won. I essentially then came to rest “outside” the law so it is
myself against all of you but in a court? You within the law. You have all
the protection you want and need; you have all of it and I have none as
you have all the power. You have violated every separation of power,
every clause, every word. You are not a Republic. You’re all criminals and
I’m the only honest, ethical person left. So now anybody who sides with
me IS Constitutional and can and may shoot but you? You’ll try to convict
us but it will not work. The whole world will find out. See why John Woo
and Cheney were cooking up “camps” to put citizens in? Upon invoking
military action against them? When any just government falls then the
officers refuse to apply the law until finally the citizens act and so then the
government must begin locking them up w/o trial, locking them up w/o any
charge and even killing them al a Germany. The US did it by refusing to
accord women justice and then granting all of their rights to foreign-born
men like Kissenger, Delay, Swarzeneggar and Obama. I have zero rights
and they have any right they make up? They can manufacture things like
511 to even say as I’m a woman I’m not natural born as a foreign born

13
 man is??? Even McCain did it – a veteran - so now I have he most moral
authority as he took them all down with him.

20. WE won the Revolution. The Declaration, Revolution and Constitution is

all the jurisdiction and cause you need. It’s the arguable basis as women
w/o any title or paper did not have legal power then and do not now. The
Constitution trumps US code every time. That’s the authority; the paper
authority is the law and the living authority is me not YOU. Paul Zoss has
no clue so how can I reason with a person who has no idea what he is
doing as he’s not smart enough to do it or he’s so arrogant he’s assuming
the risk when he can never win? I took on SCOTUS alone and defeated it
as all of them together aren’t more able. It’s not a choice to believe this or
not as it is a fact of history:

21. I, Susan, am the smartest person alive on Earth now. That person lives
somewhere. It could be a person in the rain forest. It could be a person in
the Artic. What in the world makes you truly believe it is some egg headed
man in a suit? What makes you think it is some rich, famous person? No,
all they have is advantage and privilege I do not. Pretend the smartest
person alive is in the Artic. What would they be doing? Whatever that
society values or needs. They might never even set foot in any organized
school. What if that person was black and living in Detroit? They might
become a neurosurgeon or they might become a crackhead. A crackhead
could be the smartest living person but we lost him as we couldn’t
overcome racism, sexism and political corruption. What if the smartest
living person is a woman who was subjected to horrific abuse and battery,
incessant and unending? What if the Judiciary began participating, first as
they had unjust policy, then as they took bribes and then as they
REFUSED to accord her justice – no redress in person – as they would
have to admit fault and even guilt? She’d end up dead, end up on drugs,
go insane (end stage torture or addiction) or fight back. I found out that
there’s one other choice: She’d secure everlasting life for making the case
thus be rewarded by the exactly named Creator. It never occurred to me
that to make the case you’d have to prove God – prove death as that
became the standard for women and enlisted service members - thus
have to meet the Creator.

14
22. The smartest person on the planet, if she is a woman and lives in the US,
would do what that society values. Porn, prostitution and stripping. She’s smart
not stupid. She’d be arguing government, science and theology, all male
dominated and even all male fields as to secure justice she’d have to slaughter
patriarchy now realized as criminal activity in the highest federal offices. She’d
have to be the victim as she’d have to be the most victimized or she couldn’t
know some answers; the correct application wouldn’t be hers. Then she’d have
to take on SCOTUS all alone – as both victim and counsel – as that’s the only
way to end the corruption and crime: a second Revolution.

23. She’d be smart enough to know that as physics, government and theology
all came to a dead end that she needed to focus on the one thing they all
missed. If law is law and so all three match then there’d be a law they
must not know, maybe more than one, and then she could unite all three.
Sounds like the missing or undefined law is within US law and that all
three are then united in US law – if it’s elegant (all law came into existence
with the universe; US law came into existence with the universe; we had
to turn it into written form so law is but we then have to define it and write
it down).

24. And every man and title would fight her as it then meant no more unjust
privilege or overly broad power for anyone. People do not want equality;
they only say they do. No federal judge wants to be equal to a litigant. You
all like the unjust power and control you abuse. You like the feeling it gives
you and the money and material goods it accords you. Let me tell you
something: In a courtroom? ANY courtroom? The judge and the lawyers
all know more than the litigants. You all have different knowledge but
some of you have more. Some of you have expert knowledge; some of
you have exclusive knowledge. You are all unequal; so who is at the
biggest disadvantage? The woman litigant. Who has nothing but her vote
as everything was taken from her. She had to become the best ever. And
she did. And now you work double and triple time to keep her out or else
she’ll blow the whistle on you and what you are doing. Problem is: The
People finally had enough with Obama. Black victims have become
victimizers and next up? Rwanda; Nazi Germany. The US will have a race
war only it will be the ethical, those not in office, versus the unethical,
those in office, so Cheney and Co had a reason to fear the citizens. I’m
not Timothy McVeigh as he did not exhaust the legal process. I’m the

15
 very first citizen to exhaust it thus we have no process or only undue
process. If I blew up a federal building? I’d walk. LOL! I told the clerks and
Justices in 09-677: We might be better off letting the military blow the
building up with you in it. Did they call the Marshalls or Secret Service? No
as they know I made my case; I won; they know I’m merely stating actual
application of the law NOT making a threat.

25. All I’m doing now is making an attempt to then avoid violence as it’s not
necessary IF a court will stop denying reality and hear us, The People, in
person. You tell us: WHY or HOW do you inflict a person not qualified to
hold the office on us in open and direct violation of the law as he can
never get around or over signing 511? So federal judges then are forcing
all The People who did not vote for Obama or McCain as they did not
qualify or vote at all as they couldn’t to suffer him. How offensive can you
be? How much cruel and unusual punishment can you dish out, especially
to women? You deny me any and all rights, any and all protection
whatsoever, and Obama then gets my right? A right not even his? Or if it
was his a right he gave up when he committed a crime as he’s an expert
and so he knew signing 511 is a crime? When he bought that seat via
private money? Why can’t I buy it? I could as it’s for sale if you did not
impoverish me to then keep me out.

26. The truth is: you do not want to now address the ugly mess you have
created. You know as fact I made the case as you can all read the
SCOTUS docket and so you are frightened. Too bad. I’m NOT a coward
so why can’t I confront these people? Some of these people are my
accusers. NY State said, “other [crimes] were committed” to justify a
GUILTY verdict and the awarding of my kids to third parties. WHAT
crimes? What acts? Name them. It refuses. Guilty? This is family court.
There’s no such thing as guilty but NY did it. And now you let this go on
and on, you let women be injured over and over and over by denying and
ignoring the law applies to them until you created a mess so large it
frightens you.

27. What th are you so afraid of? I’m the one volunteering to be shot not you.
If I make this case I’m making myself the target. If you keep me out to
avoid hearing me in person? Then you’re making yourself the target. And
unfortunately for you: I’ve got the paperwork, the SCOTUS docket and

16
 SCOTUS action, that let’s me walk away, as nobody can find me guilty. If
you don’t protect me then you don’t find me. If you don’t accord me my
right of redress or any right then you can’t charge me when I shoot you. If
you ask me to pay that fee? It’s you trying to find me with Court rule.
You’ve placed court rule above the Constitution. Above The People.
You’re deliberately injuring The People with Court rule as if it’s the
authority over them. Gross abuse of power. DICTATORSHIP.
FOREIGNIZATION.

28. I’m going to teach Paul Zoss a lesson: A man once tried to convince me
that he was smarter than me by citing his IQ was 185. LOL! I said, “My IQ
is 250.” He said, “It CAN’T be. The test only goes up to 200.” LIAR!
PROOF I, A MAN, AM SMARTER THAN YOU AS YOU DIDN’T EVEN
KNOW WHAT AN IQ TEST GOES UP TO! So, he took my bait. “That’s
interesting. I didn’t know that. Wow! I’m even smarter than the people who
made up the IQ test.” Do you get this? Who can make up a test with a
score going to 200 and then claim as absolute fact that you can’t be
smarter, that you can’t have an IQ over that number? I, Susan, can’t be
smarter than a piece of paper? As people made up the test yes you can –
if you’re smarter than all of them put together. PLUS: If you only use about
10% of your brain, if most people only use about that much, what if you
used 20%? Or 30%? So me and twenty men all score a perfect 200.
Who’s the smartest? I’ll tell you who: The person who passes the only
actual IQ test around: The person who makes the case for equal
protection as you must complete the base of human knowledge for this
Earth age, find or define the missing law/s and then unite it all. Then we
evolve. It’s happening already: look at children. Autism is skyrocketing in
boys as the injury is being inflicted before birth. Other children are born
smarter and smarter, some with seemingly odd skills like extraordinary
talents in one field. You’re seeing more prodigies but also kids with the
ability to use their whole brain. The kids who escape the injury that is. I
willed myself to power; I accessed more of my brain. I always had it but
the injury kept me from using it as I was tortured. Some neural pathways
were shut down by the injury while others never lit up. I healed that and
then opened other pathways up thus I use more brain than you do,
literally. I could always score 200 on an IQ test; I just couldn’t use like I
should have been able to and I noticed that. The way I use my brain now?
LOL! Einstein couldn’t keep up and it’s too damn bad and if you don’t

17
 wanna believe it as you have the proof: The SCOTUS docket. A 1 st in
history. What no man could do.

29. That makes me the brain trust of this operation. Like Jefferson or like
Adams The People can’t afford to lose me. Someday very soon a person
will shoot a federal agent. Federal agents like the Secret Service and
federal Judges are criminally protecting Obama at our expense. Tribute.
So a person will take out a federal agent exactly like we shot British
soldiers. That person will be arrested. Upon arraignment? He’ll argue legal
justification citing my SCOTUS action as first you dissolve the legal bonds
and then you can abolish a dead institution – shoot an officer. That judge
might place him in physical custody; he might not. Can and may you
criminally find a person who has been denied any and all protection of the
law even by SCOTUS, the Chief Justice, and the Executive? When all
rights have been violated and not one authority would act to enforce the
law? No matter how it turns out at some point the nation, THE PEOPLE,
will be informed: The war is on; we can now shoot to kill as the crooks said
they aren’t budging; they’ll harm us with impunity.

30. How are agents like the Secret Service, FBI or military ever going to
reason their actions when they know what Marshall said: Disobey and
defy illegal orders? What, you as a federal judge can’t read 511? You do
not know Obama is sitting in violation of the law? If I know as I told you
and I supported everything I said with hardcore proof then how did Paul
Zoss not know??? Paul Zoss? I gave him something only the DOJ has: A
clerk in the Supreme Court who was worried as to how all of this would
turn out as they get the point of law and wondered if any justice had ever
seen the case or if the clerks were hiding it, as they knew if a Justice read
it then a Justice would act, sent me a piece of proof. He took it from the
court, mailed it to me and I have it. I copied it and gave it to you, the DOJ
and the US military. As I truly believe the Justices, especially Roberts,
never saw the case but only the summary the clerks made or maybe not
at all? If I shot and killed Paul Zoss then guess who could plead ignorant?
The Justices as it is actual obstruction of justice – by the SCOTUS clerks.
If you injure a Justice like this it is treason as you also injured the acting,
legal President, me, and the natio, The People. You targeted women with
deliberation. And didn’t the clerks say that they would and could do this?
YES. As they had no idea what it would mean as they could not get over

18
the fact that they are not as smart as they believe they are. I warned them
and they kept it doing it. They told me they would never get caught. I said,
YES YOU WILL – WHEN WE GO TO WAR HERE. Never happened,
never will they said. They said no woman could – it’s not possible for a
woman to do what a man can’t - so no woman would, as they wouldn’t let
her NOT as she didn’t have the ability. I said, “You morons. It did happen
once. You keep telling me it never happened. What’s “it”? Women’s
equality? A pro se woman arguing in person? A nonlawyer arguing in
person? Right, all that never happened as you are deliberately keeping
the case out. What you fuckers do not get is that it did happen once as if
what we have to do is go to war against you thus fight another Revolution
then we will as we HAVE to do so. If you say you’re not ever going to let
us into the Supreme Court to secure protection of the law? Then we war.
As long as only lawyers are allowed to argue then THE PEOPLE not just
women can never, ever secure their rights as the office was foreignized.
An actual foreign invasion happened so it is. Now WE, THE PEOPLE,
can’t overcome it unless you allow us to appear in person in the Supreme
Court but you said you will not allow the only person who can and will
argue the case, Susan Herbert, entry. Why? Easy: The clerks assumed a
risk – we can harm her and get away with it - and lost. So it is now the
authority who rose and the authority THE PEOPLE, LAWFUL VOTERS,
chose over the foreign government: Obaam and all crooks. You say you
have a constitution. no you do not as you do not abide by it at all as you
shut The People out and favored Obama. We have the original
documents. If you then say you have the 1871 version as your
Constitution? You did until the officers defaulted on 11/05/08. Right now it
is I, Susan, The acting, legal President and Commander, with the Justices
and The People, versus Obama and all others. The Justices aren’t
obeying Obama. You can’t know which side they will choose until they
hear me in person. Which side are you on? The People who obey the
original documents and the Founder’s instructions, The Federalist Papers,
or Obama’s, rule by a cabal of criminal lawyers and privateers not him? I’ll
give you a clue as to whose side the Justices will be on once they choose:
We know as absolute fact w/o question TWO Justices will choose I as the
legal authority and The People as the constitutionally set government and
not Obama: Scalia and Thomas are originalists.”

19
31. The clerks then have a good reason to be afraid of me. Every male clerk
save one might be tried for treason and executed once my case is heard. I
gave them an opportunity to secure immunity and they assumed more
risk. Maybe you should fry or hang or be shot if you have proof you can’t
defeat a litigant – she has beaten you every single time thus you have not
been able to stop her and no federal agent is willing to arrest her when
confronted – and you reason and decide: The People will never rise up
against the institutions. We can do anything we went to them.” Never?
You are aware we fought a Revolution, aren’t you?

32. Lawyers have been complaining about the clerks of SCOTUS for a while.
Files go missing. Papers go missing. Cases aren’t filed. A clerk likes
Obama? He plays games with a petition. Don’t like a case? Fudge what
you write when you summarize it. In my case? As I sought to overturn a
case of oj, an authority case, no clerk could touch it as only the Justices
are qualified as it entered as an emergency application so no clerk ever
summarized Bush V Gore. Clerks have zero power and authority to
summarize such cases; only Justices may as the lawyer pressing it is
equaling himself to the Chief Justice and Executive. If the clerk had the
power and authority? If he had the human ability? He’d be pressing it! But
we had a unique legal situation: Ask yourself: As a male clerk can never
have a baby thus can never give testimony rising to proof of pregnancy,
birth or woman, can he then summarize it? It’s humanly impossible for him
to know it. As that is a male clerk claming he CAN and DID give birth to a
baby! Or that he is a woman! I told these clerks that they would only prove
what they did, commit treason, by interfering in the case but they thought
they were tricky enough to outsmart me thus hide their actions from the
public. Wrong.

33. The clerk claiming to be named Will said something interesting to me:
When he told me the clerks would sink the case? He said he knew the
elements to look for; he said it as if SOMEBODY ORDERED THEM TO
ALWAYS SINK THE CASE FOR WOMEN IF THEY SAW IT. I’ve never
been able to speak to a woman – ever. No woman touched my
documents. I do not believe a Justice said this so WHO did? Where did
that policy come from? Guess what? The Chief Clerk is named William.
He’s ex military too. He would have reason to stop a woman from
Commanding – he personally doesn’t like it. He’s about 70 years old. How

20
 long has he been there? What if the Justices have no idea this policy
exists and male clerks know about it, have been acting on it and have
been enforcing it for years? What if at some point this decision was made,
by him or by a former employee, and it’s gone on w/o anyone ever
knowing until I was able to argue case law until he lost thus screamed it
and hung up on me? He’s said the clerks could and would sink it; he said
as if they had a plan. What if he himself wanted it sunk as he knew he was
caught violating the rights of all citizens by me- no woman and no
nonlawyers ever - and then enforced his own order? His own policy? Or
what if it is merely accepted as fact w/o question and nobody outside the
office ever knew? All you can do is order Roberts to appear and find out.
Obama and I prove natural birth and Roberts awards the commission.
SIMPLE. NO BIG DEAL. NO MESSY CRIMINAL CASE. No Justices
testifying.

34. Federal agents and so every officer of this court works for The People. We
own the institutions, the building, the computers, the judicial robes, the
gavels, the actual bench and all of the paper. The only thing we do not
own is you, the persons. Default is; the sitting officers defaulted and not
one person working in this courthouse objected. Then the Judiciary itself
defaulted when Roberts did. The Justices work for US, remember? Then
the criminal element elected and installed Obama when this case had not
had any appearance in person so we had not been heard thus The People
had zero informed consent. Federal judges actively kept this case and all
other Obama suits out of court. In my case what is being done is heinous
as I alone have the case. To deny The People, the living people, any
appearance but allow the paper entry? And when the highest court acted
upon it proving it is the case and that we won? You are dead, as you have
favored the dead institutions over life. Obama? If you participated in this
election you are guilty if you knew and all lawyers knew but if you did not?
Then you’re responsible as not only was I not allowed to appear to then
inform the People but Obama REFUSED to reveal those documents so he
actively denied the voters informed consent. The Voters said: If it is not
true, if he was born here and never claimed to be a foreigner and never
traveled on that passport as as foreign citizen then WHY won’t he release
them? Nothing Obama says is true, it’s not reasonable, as he answers to
the People not to his lawyers or his donors. To install and then protect a
person who acted criminally BEFORE the election as he REMOVED the

21
 statement regarding dual citizenship – that he was one as if it was legal to
be one - from his own website and he signed 511 and then he used
private money to buy the Office thus denied all natural born citizens
especially women their rights and may have denied some of us our lives
and when he knows exactly what he is doing as he claims to be a
constitutional law professor and he was president of Harvard Law Review
is then repugnant. If this court or any court wanted that fee? You should
have asked long, long ago as I was in federal court in 2007. You should
have asked and then heard the case in person. We can argue that fee;
when I win? It’s called a criminal conviction and then you’re hung for
treason as you knew but did it to The People regardless – you protected
Obama’s paperwork and his lawyers instead of The People.

35. All those institutions we own? If you have violated every word of the two
governing documents and now you have actually foreignized the office
with a person who is a foreigner according to all evidence some of which
rises to proof and that is entered to this court and if you also foreignized
the office by allowing privateers to buy it via use of private money thus
then give it to a criminal as 511 constitutes a signed confession then you
would have no need of the commission: Our two original governing
documents. Why do you need to own two documents that mean nothing to
you and that you refuse to live out? You think if you possess them that
then means you are those thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs. You do
not own them, The People do. We own all of Washington DC. If the
officers wanted to claim ownership as DC incorporated in 1871 then they
had their chance and opted not to do so. They assumed a risk: It’s is
common knowledge that no officer wants to publicly admit DC is a
corporation due to that 1871 action so they avoid ever answering any sit
addressing it. EVERYBODY knows this. So I outsmarted them as long as
federal judges were going to let them hide by not answering and never
forcing them to answer, as if they alone are above the law: you MUST
answer an authority case. I’m the legal authority; you answer to me not to
Obama or anyone else. You answer The People by answering to me. If
you fail to answer an authority case? You have just told The People you
are refusing to obey their order, a legal order that is valid and binding as
proven by the SCOTUS docket – the court employees weren’t sp stupid as
to disobey the Executive Order I issued no matter what else they did - so
you know you must but are assuming the risk, as your belief is no judge

22
 will ever make you answer to the Constitution so you’ll never suffer any
consequences. So in defense of The People I took care of your tendency
to run away and hide: Marbury V Madison says you can’t use default to
then make redress for the violation of a fundamental, fully vested right
impossible. If you do? All you are doing is proving the Republic is dead as
you can’t be constitutional if you make redress impossible. Marbury itself
is a pro se authority case thus precedent is set: You must answer.
Appearance in person MUST happen. Why do you think Marshall heard it
in person? In any pro se constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction
the case must be heard in person as the constitutionally set government is
The People not the paper. It’s not the federal judge; it’s the petitioner as
he or she is acting in defense of the People. Marbury secured actual legal
power, one vote, for all white men. See why the officers and lawyers want
us kept out? So only they ever have redress; so only unconstitutional and
repugnant things possess power and control. God forbid The People
possess power and authority. So, why do unjust persons determined to
keep The People out only to protect the criminal status quo need the two
governing documents? They do not. If it is something that is the property
of the fed? The People own it. Personally I’d let you keep all of it but the
Smithsonian, the Library of Congress and the two documents (the
National Archives is a part of the National Museum). Ultimately that’s up to
The People. But we’re not going to let those criminals in DC spit on our
Founders or wipe their feet on the two documents; we’re here to
adjudicate that commission to then have it delivered to us. The People
chose me as their representative. The sitting officers, privateers and
others chose Obama.

36. If The People had the good sense to choose the most intelligent living
human being alive, a person who is a woman and a mother, and who
proved her ability and capability by accessing SCOTUS directly and
forcing SCOTUS to act, thus forced the sitting officers to default, and who
has the most moral authority and you, whoever you are, chose a name on
that invalid ballot or Obama himself, and keep supporting Obama and the
Congress no matter how obvious it becomes that you were lied to as US
sovereignty is going out the window – hello North Korea! You made a
president bow down to you - and Obama has not once acted alone to
exert and/or exude authority, that he is not in charge, and if you yourself
see it all over and read about it in every magazine and paper now that his

23
 facade is crumbling as now he has to actually do the job, and when
previous, serious supporters are bailing, then that’s your proof: You are
not reasoning your vote. So, The People chose me as their representative
and chose well, thus you are denying us any and all appearance in person
only as you chose poorly so we’ll win not you? Here’s a clue: As we are all
to be living out the two governing documents we are all to be on the same
side. There’s to be no winning and losing. If there is? You’re foreign. If
innocent people are dying because of you and your failure? You’re a
criminal. So you have just persons headed by Susan Herbert pitted
against unjust persons headed by Barack Obama. And Obama does not
have to answer to the just persons? According to all law and case law he
does.

37. If we win and he and his cronies insist on remaining in office? We’ll do
what we’ve been doing: Act as the constitutionally set government as we
do not NEED the trappings but will not let them have those two
documents. We’ll keep convening exactly as we have been. The unjust
persons are using those documents to then convince people that they are
legal when they are not. Go ahead: Live in the Whitehouse. But you’ll
have to do it w/o the paper governing documents. And guess what else?
I’m appearing w/o any paper: No notes, no books, no written arguments.
I’m appearing by myself, as my own person is all I need. I can defend the
black firefighters, the American Indians who seek to address the Ft.
Laramie Treaty, the pro-lifers and pro-abortionists, teen sex leading to
teen pregnancy, the state of LA’s argument re the death penalty for child
rape, Terry Schiavo’s family, Jessica Gonzales daughters, “gay rights”, the
Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq veterans, the separation of church and
state, atheists, etc .etc. etc. You name your problem and I can solve it, as
I can and will defend you. I can’t give you what you want but what you
need: The truth. The correct application and all of the actual reasons why.
There’s actual reasoning why those black firefighters are having such a
hard time passing that test; it’s not how they study the material. Foreign
policy, as you’ve convinced the citizens its “good”, a qualification to act as
president, and that it somehow proves ability when all it does is force us to
become foreign? I’ve got foreign policy you can’t beat. I do not need any
paper as I’ve got my own ideas. If it is your intellectual property, why
would you ever need to read from paper? You own it or you don’t. Scalia
said: Do not read us your brief. Do not read us your petition. Tell us what

24
 we don’t know. I thought: That would take ten years. Obama can show up
with anything he wants, as much paper as he needs, but not with lawyers
as he is one. I’m not. It’s not fair; it’ll never be fair; Obama would need
twenty college degrees to equal me so let him bring all of the paper he
needs.

38. Do you not see and hear the criminality in keeping The People out of a
courtroom, a physical place, they own? If anyone should be kept out it’s
the crooks. But we have law that we obey and enforce. It’s our courtroom;
we’ll enter it. We have at least 16 grand jury indictments we need to
enforce. As they arose from American common law they meet the strictest
standard as The People acted to secure them when all authorities failed.
The most moral authority as The People went by the book; they followed
the named process. This is not going to become France as we aren’t
French, we abhor bloodbaths and I’m the People’s duly elected leader as I
received two legal votes while not one other candidate did. You know how
you know they are legal? SCOTUS upheld them by acting upon them
directly after they were entered directly. From The American Grand Jury
itself as they should be able to enforce those indictments via my person
once that happened but the Federal Judiciary does not understand that
power is not theirs to give or take away so we have to fight on various
fronts:

Re: Grand Jury Presentments

Defendants: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi
Docket Number: Misc. No. 09-346 (RCL)

Judge Lamberth,

The sin of the people is to lose faith in their Constitution. The sin of our
Judiciary is to procrastinate while enforcing the Constitution.

American Grand Jury

Judge Lamberth, apparently procrastination is now in full force and effect in your
Court. How serious does a Constitutional crisis have to become before the
Judiciary will act? Is the workload of the Judiciary so overwhelming that the
Constitution has to wait in line to receive recognition or service?

25
Barack Obama has committed serious crimes against our Nation. The evidence
is well documented and published. Barack Obama has admitted in public and his
writings that his father was not a US citizen. Clearly, Obama can never qualify as
a “natural born” citizen. The Constitution states that only a “natural born” citizen
shall be eligible for the Office of the Presidency. It is so simple a 10 year old child
can grasp the truth. Yet power and corruption would seek to quash and deny the
truth to the People of the United States. Does the Justice system in this country
think that most citizens are so ignorant that they cannot understand a simple
clause in the Constitution?

Your Honor, we would imagine these statements are not what you wanted to
hear. Matter of fact, we understand that our statements probably make you angry
or make you want to reprimand those that challenge your Court or authority.
Well, your Honor, get in line. Many are now challenging your intentions. It is now
estimated that 60% of Americans want to know the truth about Barack Obama.
He has spent close to 2.0 million dollars fighting something like 15 civil lawsuits
to hide the truth about his citizenship. Each time a Judge says this is a
“jurisdictional” issue or a “standing” issue the People want to throw up. The day
the Constitution or the People no longer have jurisdiction or standing in this
Country is the day the Judiciary can no longer be trusted to defend or
administrate the laws of our land.

Time is no longer a luxury the Judiciary can afford to waste. Before the Court is a
21-page document that charges Barack Obama with “Eligibility Fraud and
Treason.” It further charges Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi with “Conspiracy of
Election Fraud.” These are extremely serious criminal charges that must be
heard before the Court. If Obama can produce a valid Birth Certificate proving
that he was born in the United States, and further prove his birth mother and
father were citizens of the United States, then the man’s name will be exonerated
and the case closed forever. But this proof has never been offered and the
people have the right to know. Obama no longer has the right to conceal the
truth, not when it concerns a blatant criminal violation of the Constitution. The
charges have been levied against the man. The question is, what is this Court
going to do about it?

Judge Lamberth, we fight evil by exposing it. Once the truth is known, evil has no
power over you or your Court. The People of this country are a lot stronger than
the government would lead us to believe. The talk that our Country could never

26
survive an election scandal is simply an excuse. The truth of the matter is this
Country cannot survive an attack on the Constitution by a public criminal when
the Judiciary fails to do anything about it.

American Grand Jury and its members have gone to great lengths to study the
evidence and hand down our Presentments. We have served your Court with
these Presentments and responded to your Orders. It is now time to act. Talk is
cheap and words become meaningless if Judges such as yourself are in a
position to act but fail to do so.

Judge Lamberth, we wish you a Happy New Year. We know the decisions before
you are not easy. Nothing in life is easy. Our Country was founded on courage,
conviction and action. May the Lord guide you in your decisions, may He bless
you with strength and courage.

Respectfully,

American Grand Jury

39. The latest piece of dead paper coming out of this court says that not one
party is related to the state of Iowa. Did Barack Obama receive one vote
from any Iowan? Yes. Do any of my supporters live in Iowa? Yes. Do we
have a single secret service agent in Iowa? Yes. Do we have a US
Marshal in Iowa? Yes. Do I or do I not have another case sitting in Iowa re
Obama? Are the Austins, the third parties, Democrats who voted for
Obama? Yes so they DO have a relationship with Iowa – the relationship
being the Constitution. Does Paul Zoss, who signed the ruling, know he is
not God or has no one ever bothered to inform him? Or is it that he has no
idea whatsoever as to what an authority case is or means? Notice he
changed his answer to no person is related to Iowa, as he knows he saw
lots and lots of proof for me and against the Austin’s including the family
court ruling proving the Austin’s breached the contract which he can’t deny
with his standard line so he needed more to make it seem as if. Proof mo
sane person can deny. A licensed lawyer enters with much less, at times
with nothing. Would Zoss ask Ronald Reagan to pay a court fee or claim
he is not related to Iowa if he filed on behalf of The People while he was
acting as the legal president? No as his peers would laugh at him. Does
Paul Zoss know that I’m his peer and that unless he can produce a

27
 SCOTUS docket with his name on it as both counsel and victim then he’s
not my peer as a federal judge as I outrank him? That he is not qualified to
JUDGE anything as if he was he’d then know this is about JUSTICE? He
might want to learn what vertical checks and balances are as he has just
proven he is unfit to serve but somehow got to be on a federal bench. So
now it’s: Herbert V Obama, Roberts and Zoss, or, The People versus The
Institutions. Now, how long do you think The People will take it before they
act?

40. What the Federal Judiciary fails to comprehend over and over: You truly
believe you are safe from any and all consequences as you have a
lifetime appointment and the Congress will not impeach you. Who ever
told you that your lifetime appointment meant for the duration of your
natural life? Let Congress fail to impeach. Your lifetime appointment then
is only good for the lifetime of the Republic. That’s means you’re running
on borrowed time as the legal bonds were dissolved on 11/04/08 when the
unethical and criminal voted for Obama and this was then made real on
11/05/08 as all of the sitting officers defaulted. SCOTUS then confirmed
this by entering me directly and acting upon me directly. It matters not if
the clerks did it. No legal relationship now exists – it is dissolved - thus we
can and may start abolishing you, the dead institutions.

41. So Sioux City: Are we going to shoot and kill one of you? Should I write to
SCOTUS and say, “First time it is Crispus Attuks. Second time it’s Paul
Zoss.” [If you then lose the war you are not known as an American martyr
so you need to consider this. This time The People would shoot the
blackcoats and the three piece suits, the sitting officers, as they defaulted
and we won the orderly transfer of power but now pretend it never
happened.]

42. Moral authority. I own it but you don’t. You can do what you know you are
required to do by law, HEAR THE CASE, or you can play a game with
your life. If you’re a person who will only come to be reasonable thus
acknowledge the truth of your actions when a bullet is being drilled into
your skull thus you then know “I shouldn’t have written that; I knew better;
this isn’t a joke” then play some more games as you aren’t harming me
but only you. I’m only here as The People want to do this w/o violence if
they can. I don’t think that’s possible. I know that you have been acting as

28
 you do your whole life thus truly believe it is acceptable. You believe we all
do it. Your one of those people who was taught to lie in the womb, who
never suffered any consequence and who was rewarded for doing the
wrong things. You believe you are invincible and that as if you are the
standard, as if as nothing like this ever happened before then it never will.

43. In kindergarten I met you: every kid in my class lied about their person
when I was set up to fail. My teacher wanted to know who was the
strongest kid in our class. She said open this latch. Everybody couldn’t.
About half the kids went to try and then I tried; as no other kid could I gave
it all I had. I nearly ripped that latch right off of its foundation. I was
stunned. I heard that teacher say, Who’s strong in this class? I thought, I
am! That latch was a joke. Nobody could open it? So the other kids try.
Nope, not one kid. That’s crazy. So I ask the other kids. They told me that
they pretended that they were weak. They pretended they couldn’t open it.
Why would you ever lie about your person, about what it was good to be?
They said, As we did not want to be blamed. For what? The crime. That
teacher asked who was the strongest not who was guilty. Those kids
were being taught to lie about their person – at age five. So their parents
did it. Thus I know how all of you got your start; I know liars, fakers,
pretenders when I meet them in person or on paper. It takes practice to
become Bill Clinton or a criminal federal judge. If you started at age 5?
Good, as you just met your match – your equal and opposite force and
who is not afraid of you at all. Like I told those kids: innocent people do
not feel guilty. If I have to shoot a federal judge as they bound and
determined to keep violating us? I’m not gonna feel even so much as an
ounce of guilt as I’m not.

44. Women in the United States of America are dying at the hands of state
and federal judges and state and federal court clerks. SEE SCHIAVO as
proof is proof. Did a SCOTUS ruling kill her or not? I blame the LAWYERS
for her husband as they argued, “I, a man with unclean hands want justice
so need to murder an innocent woman.” Word it anyway you wish as I
heard their argument loud and clear. I can even name their motivation and
intention as they do not know it but I heard them say it. As I did? A
violation of Article 4 Section 4’s “domestic violence” clause as women are
not protected from domestic violence at all and are now the victims of
federal authorities who perpetrate it including the Chief Justice and

29
 Executive himself: Two offices that have been exclusively male since our
founding and this is the reason for the first violation of Article 4 Section 4’s
“domestic violence” clause, Bush V gore, which caused our Republic to
fall. LAWYERS did it. GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!

45. As every judge in this court is a lawyer? You CAN’T adjudicate this case
as an insurmountable conflict now exists as SCOTUS violated the
separation of powers in 1790 and has never, ever allowed nonlawyers
entry in person and then allowed me direct entry on paper only thus
favoring paper over people when THE People are their clients NOT
lawyers plus favoring lawyers is a violation of equal protection and due
process and targets women and children ONLY as the one lawyer who
can aid them thus make their case, SCOTUS’ case and the case for the
military, all injured by LAWYERS, MEN and Bush V Gore is I, Susan, and I
avoided receiving a law license with forethought and deliberation as if I
had that paper license then I would be making the case for LAWYERS
and more DEAD PAPER thus would lose my standing in SCOTUS. That is
because in the US were supposed to be equal but aren’t and as this case
hinges upon MORAL AUTHORITY or WILL. You have zero moral
authority if you know lawyers are perpetrating a crime all over American
as are law schools and bar associations and some of these persons are
judges as then you are participating in what you to be criminal and so
when you go before that judge? You CAN’T pull rank which is a necessary
element of this case. It is called chain of command theory. SEE THE US
MILITARY, NAVY, BOB M, JAG, MAYPORT or See the Secretary of
Defense that I hired as I’ll introduce you to him. He is ex-military, special
ops and a Vietnam veteran.

46. There’s lots of conflicts as this injury is now multiplying exponentially but
the most recent conflict that I know as fact to be insurmountable is: PAUL
ZOSS, a judge within this court. The problem is I am an expert in the field
of human psychology and he knew that yet he refuses to acknowledge this
or any fact and as I am an expert I can ask Zoss one question which he
can never, ever answer. Why? If he answers YES then I cite what is
WRONG with his answer; if he answers NO then I cite what is WRONG
with his answer. There’s only yes or no. He can and may pull his best
lawyer tricks out but it is yes or no. So then: He needs to be locked up in a
mental institution or a jail. Kathy Shumney, Dr. Robyn Waxman and Dr.

30
 Laurel Northup taught me most of what I know about psychology as they
once described a form of denial that runs so deep it is often the hardest
disease to cure. It can even be dangerous if you accidentally say certain
words to the person in denial. In their experience they had not found that
people with this specific form of denial were so sick they belonged in
hospitals but jail – if they took it that far as they knew on some level but
did it regardless. I truly believe Zoss has this exact disease. I truly believe
if we haul in my experts they will agree as they will point other same thing
I will: The magistrate judge is Paul Zoss; Paul Zoss is this person, who
testified he is Paul Zoss; the name on the ruling in question is Paul Zoss
therefore he is guilty in my opinion not mentally ill and not insane. Why?

47. I’m willing to teach you as every judge I have ever met seems hell bent
upon making me believe that the law of the US does not apply opt them or
to any officer – certainly no lawyer – and no matter how many times I point
out that if you tell me that the law does not apply to you then you are
telling me that you, an expert, know the law contains an equal protection
and due process clause, that the separation of powers is clearly
delineated and contains zero special privileges for judges and/or lawyers
but you are going to try your best to convince the public, The People it
does thus it is like you are saying ‘Watch me assault and batter The
People by violating Article 4 Section 4 as many times as possible and then
when I finally kill somebody and I know it I’ll attack the paper by making all
the law I want within my rulings.” All the tricks that have always worked, I
mean since we first came over on the Mayflower, DO NOT work with me
but judges keep trying and then try in such a way they prove they are
delusional in the medical sense of the word. Ego rises and federal judges
who are nothing more than bullies dressed up in judicial costumes seem
to be hell bent upon proving they can do something to stop me or kill me
and as it always, always worked when I warn them it will not on me they
then choose to take that chance regardless. And when they do they give
themselves up. Usually this takes a few entries but as I already entered
SCOTUS directly? One ruling is all it takes. US law is physics and
theology as nay actual law of the universe is also a law of the US found
within our declaration and Constitution as law is law is law. Oh, you can
label it law but is it? If it is inalienable thus a right and so a law then you
will find the physics and the theology to match it exactly. You can also
distill the Declaration and Constitution down to equations and then even a

31
 single number. The physics is equilibrium, a state, thus if you write
anything that is a lie? I gotcha! That lie will reach out from your head and
then your pen and pass by me and come right back to sting you. The
Republic fell so your going own by your own hand as you participated in
it’s destruction with forethought and deliberation and you had motive,
intent, means and opportunity as well as you’re a lawyer. If any of that was
absent? It would not be possible for whatever you write to then come back
and harm you. If what you wrote is lawful, fact and correct, THE TRUTH,
then I appear in person in court.

48. I keep saying it but judges keep playing dumb: if you’ve never, ever seen
a constitutional authority case of o.j. that overturns another case of o.j.
then how the hell would you know more than the woman who is it as she
successfully pressed it as PROVEN by her name appearing on the
SCOTUS docket? That slams into your ego like lightning. They can’t
believe a woman would enter their court and say that their law license is a
canker and that she is not impressed as she is not your equal but your
better as until or unless your name is on the docket as an authority case
then guess what? You’re not the authority and you are not even A
authority as if you were? Then you, a federal judge, would have known
Bush V Gore for what it is. Paul Zoss?

49. He said: ‘plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that
this court has jurisdiction over this matter’. As of BVG it’s every man for
himself as the Republic is no more and then you voted in a foreigner
you’re now protecting at The People’s expense – Zoss defaulted in 2000
as he used to be one of The People and then on 11/20/08 as he’s an
officer – so Zoss said I failed to demonstrate to he himself ‘sufficient fact’.
Paul Zoss you have yourself to blame: I listed this fact: Susan, Jefferson,
A Summary View, Declaration, Revolution, Constitution, The People,
Marbury, vote, BVG, natural birth, Obama. That’s way more than
sufficient. If you placed all of the fact I listed in the documents and
attachments? I used my brain so I entered every fact of Earth we know
since the universe was born. To keep him in line I attached the SCOTUS
petitions as he can deny he knows every fact of Earth and I can’t
challenge that or we’d be here at least a trillion years proving he’s lying so
I entered an official record no judge in the US can ever deny: The
SCOTUS docket itself. I knew he’d pull this as it’s the only exact lie that

32
 even sounds as if it might have merit as he’s banking on he fact that once
you see it’s Versus Obama you’ll assume I can’t produce a paper birth
certificate on Obama. 1. I do not ever need a piece of paper as I’m arguing
from BVG as an authority not Obama and I won or Roberts who I sued by
his name would have answered to tell me I did not make the case and 2.
he has no idea if I can or can’t produce that paper as I never asked
anyone to produce it; I not once made it an issue as this case cannot ask
for more dead paper as paper is not proof in America. Our Founders
designed and conducted a living experiment thus life not death is absolute
proof. Death and/or dead paper? The proof of death standard? That’s
proof the experiment is a bust and that our Founders are wrong, that we
weren’t ever more perfect. Religious extremist governments that ‘ask’ The
People to become suicide bombers via propaganda and indoctrination
require their citizens to meet the proof of death standard. They are not
volunteers but recruits. Also, if Paul Zoss wants to o there how would he
know what I can or can’t produce? How would he know what I have seen
with my own eyes or what I might even have a copy of? Here’s a hint: If I
can break into SCOTUS when all SCOTUS employees were alerted to my
impending direct entry thus were aware to look for me and so sink the
case – direct entry for a woman may never occur or so they claimed as we
don’t want it to be possible as it shatters our delusions - then getting a
hold of a silly birth certificate or passport is easy for me. I think my way
around obstacles; I can always outwit my opponent especially if he is not
natural born as I then will always have the advantage as its my home
court not his. Sufficient would be: Susan, Jefferson, Obama as in which
one of these three is not like the other but claims he is all over the media
going so far as to stand in front of one of our likenesses while swearing to
do the impossible – go back in time and change decisions his parents
made before he was born or that he made when taking short cuts in life to
then change his legal status and even plays the victim at times to then
equal himself to Susan? Hint: Jefferson was a victim he did not cry victim.
Like me he knew victim is NOT a state of being it is merely a legal
designation. What else did Paul Zoss say?

50. “Further, she has failed to state facts sufficient for this court to make a
determination as to whether or not she has stated an arguable basis for
relief in law or fact.” I’ll be as kind as I can: The fact of history is our law.
That’s it. Fact: Jefferson wrote A Summary View; Fact; Then he wrote The

33
 Declaration; Fact: Then The People fought a Revolution and won (no
federal judges fought only The People); Fact: Upon winning, AS WE
WON, a fact held to be universally known common no sane judge could
ever deny it or he would not be a judge, we then created The Constitution;
Fact: Jefferson then issued an order that propelled Marbury into SCOTUS
directly; Fact: Marbury V Madison was authored by Marshall thus
SCOTUS was naturally born via due process as it arose from the will of
The People acting according to the will of the Declaration and Constitution
embodied by Jefferson, their duly elected president, so that by design The
People acted in accordance with the will of the exactly named Creator aka
the universe as not only are both governing documents perfect thus
elegant but so is Marbury V Madison. Every move is perfect, every
decision is perfect, every word is perfect. The punctuation is perfect. The
right people were cast in the right roles. It all came together and worked
like a living creature, as if man used the instructions in the Jewish Kabbala
to then create another man. Marbury V Madison is elegant so is law not
theory. I know as I’m the living proof, absolute proof, as 200 years later it
all came together again only I alone knew it. I’m the “created” man all of
those facts produced, the living embodiment of the US law, as life was
breathed into my person as I invoked Marbury in a Philadelphia, PA
courtroom and appearing pro se placed my knowledge of Bush V Gore on
the record as I knew I had the case thus I could someday invoke Marbury
again and so test the last bits of it as The People claim SCOTUS is not
constitutional: as I could overturn BVG then I could unseat Bush or any
other person via standing him down as Marbury says thus make the
withholding of the commission the injury so that as Marbury says if the
commission is a part of your defense then you MUST adjudicate it if it is
withheld illegally so that delivery of the paper must follow.

51. As all of this began as custody case in which my rights and my sons rights
were violated by the Navy one son is a legal unborn person still and I was
able to place the fact that I had entered SCOTUS directly twice over and
received direct action the second time as a part of my defense but had not
received my paper commission yet only my living one. As I caught the NY
Rennselaer County Family and 3rd District Appellate engaged in bribery
and documented it? Then sent it to the judge telling her I knew everything
she ever did from day one in 2001? This hardheaded judge DENIED me
my children, kidnapped children, then retired. She said she did it, as I had

34
 no paper commission only used other words but named it all, every
element. She actually wrote that I told her I was THE constitutional
authority of the nation and she knew it as I was already back inside
SCOTUS – so she admitted that she heard the case when she knew she
had zero right or interest in jurisdiction but only sought to harm me in a
permanent manner: Death as the person who have my children want me
dead and almost got their wish. So here we are and absolute denial of the
protection of the law ONLY as I kept catching criminal officers as I am an
expert constitutional physicist lead to every right being violated until an
Appellate judge took some kind of bribe to then make the kidnapping of
my children by third parties permanent but I directly entered SCOTUS and
received direct action but yet left w/o any and all remedy and relief as
CLERKS refused to believe fact and law: In an authority case of oj. that
seeks to overturn another authority case of o.j. ONLY the JUSTICES of
SCOTUS are qualified to read it, summarize it and rule on it but no clerk is
to touch it at all except to hand the whole petition to the Justice. In this
unique case? It’s an American first: It comes down to Me, Obama and
Roberts as those clerks told me they’d do what they wanted when they
wanted no matter who it hurt even the Justices and The People thus kept
butchering the case until Obama was elected when Obama and natural
birth was named from day one: April 4th, 2007.

52. So Paul Zoss: Are you telling me that you still do not get it? OUR
HISTORICAL FACT IS THE LAW. We won, not you and not any
institution. Resolution 511 did not win. No amount of votes won. A billion
dead paper ballots did not win. You deny we have a Constitution? You
might be dead but I’m not! When I realized we were dead as I was living in
West Palm in the fall of 2000 while BVG happened I made the best
decision of my life: Dragged into a Philly courtroom only as PA sought to
murder me as it could not make me a victim thus PA knew liability was at
stake as PA knew if they could not claim you, the victim of endemic
domestic violence, had unclean hands then that woman would clean their
clock then their coffers thus PA removed my kids from protective custody
and handed them to abusers and batterers named by PA as our lethal
threat and when the third parties - THIRD parties – perjured themselves
and when PA had nasty policy targeting all women and children or The
People – and when PA did not allow me to appear with deliberation I had
to chose so I chose: Life! Court officer and every bar association told me

35
 they all knew about PA’s policy to ignore domestic violence as soon as the
courtroom door closed and to hand kids to anyone if related in any way to
then save money but nobody was going to do anything as it would affect
whatever they earned as officers of the court or as they were afraid of the
judge I had to decide as I knew BVG for what it was and I knew if no other
person would defend those women and children then I had to or else I
could not live with myself so I threw my case on purpose as those officers
told me the exact policy and that if I said it the judge would throw the case
to NY, a state that denied me jurisdiction as the plaintiff in 1998, and
when it was already proven justice was not possible for any woman in NY
as Sol Wachler, the Chief Judge of NY was tossed off the bench for
stalking a woman so that every seat under him was corrupted, it already is
as absolute fact or that could not have happened, and when 3 of NY’s
appellate’s were caught taking bribes in custody cases, and when the third
parties grandfather lived there and was National Director of Literacy of NY
State and when they would be granted jurisdiction as the plaintiffs, I had to
pick myself or my kids and then all women and children. At least in PA.

53. I’m Susan, not some windbag, cry baby, law school grad. I’m Susan, not
some stupid old man judge who only ever sat as a judge as he knew a
stupid old man Senator. I’m Susan, my mother threatened to impeach me
when I was 12 as she was not going to raise Hitler and it was going one
way or the other so she had to act as it wasn’t gonna be Hitler. She used
that word: Impeach. Good call, Mom, as I didn’t turn into Hitler but a
Founder as I chose every women and every child in the state of FL and
PA, then NY and then the US. Later I chose The US Armed Forces and
the SCOTUS Justices as I defended them all successfully.

54. I took the US now watch me take China, and then watch every penny ante
criminal government around the world crumble one by one as I know how
to leverage the power and authority of one vote like no other person ever.
You don’t have any choice but to believe me as like you’re not the legal
expert around here neither are you the science expert. It’ll be a cold day in
hell before a federal judge tells me he’s a theological expert. If that
happens then Paul Zoss might have found his cellmate.

55. I am In Re Susan Herbert, Supreme Court of the US Petition 07-9804 &

08-66-22 and Susan Herbert V US et al 09-6777. I am also Susan Herbert

36
 V John Roberts 11/20/08: The second American citizen ever to enter
SCOTUS directly and receive direct action. I became the first nonlawyer
citizen to gain entry to the SCOTUS bar and the first woman to argue her
own case. I won my case; you know as absolute fact w/o question that I
won as my case is a breach of contract suit, a constitutional authority case
of original jurisdiction that sought to overturn Bush V Gore. The US, every
sitting officer, defaulted in 08-6622 as the Solicitor General MAY NOT
waive the interest and right of every natural born citizen as some citizens
have vested those rights. As he did at first then he had no choice but to
default or he would be committing treason. The waiver caused SCOTUS
to violate Marbury as they could not know something and I could not tell
the Justices. So then upon returning to SCOTUS to then inform them of
what they did not know – you mistakenly violated Marbury – I, 08-6622,
was directly entered w/o ever having gone to any lower court at all. So this
is the point the Solicitor general did the only thing he could do: default.

56. A constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction is like no other but

this type is the first ever and extraordinarily rare: No other citizen has ever
overturned a case of original jurisdiction itself. This changes everything as
if you overturn a case of original jurisdiction you not claiming the Justices
ruled in error but wrongly. “Wrongly” might be a crime but it might not as
unlike any other court SCOTUS was being asked in who’s hands to place
the legal and physical custody of the US, which is The People, Bush or
Gore’s, so SCOTUS may rule wrongly with forethought and deliberation
fully knowing people might be killed, but it may not be a crime if they had
no other choice or if they were held to impossible standards.

57. I have always maintained that SCOTUS was held to at least two
impossible standards. I can name several. One is The People defaulted
upon the contract first by failing to vote, failing to accord women and
children equal protection and due process of the law or even any
protection at all and by failing to reason their vote when they did vote. The
proof is: Bush V Gore opened the door for any willing American to then
REASON and decide if they could hold the Office of the Executive as
neither bush nor gore argued their own case thus both George Bush and
Al Gore proved in an absolute manner that they had zero ability to fulfill
the oath of office as it reads “I will” not “My lawyer will” and no person is
entitled to legal representation in a custody case. SEE LASSITER. 5. Not

37
one citizen but myself realized this; I am the only person on Earth who
knew all of the reasons Bush V Gore should never have been heard as it
is NOT a legal case at all. If you are born in a war to then secure the vote
then if you ever take that vote to your court of last resort then you are
openly declaring civil war or in this case martial law. The US is unique: As
SCOTUS may not make law but installing a President is making law as a
president can issue an executive order or stand The People down then all
SCOTUS did was install a Commander – a person who might become a
military dictator. It also makes something else possible: An actual
foreigner may seize control of the Office due to our law and the way we
fund elections. But even without any funding it is our law as the US has
law like no other: SCOTUS is not our court of last resort – The People are.
As the Chief Justice and President stand each other down then after the
president you take it to The People. Now, this is where I am going to
anger a lot of judges who read this: I’m gonna go real slow and I’ll use
very small words if necessary so you get it BUT: I am the legal, acting
President of the US. I am THE constitutional authority of the US. The
People defaulted, the officers defaulted and then the Chief Justice
defaulted. You know why? My argument wins as my clients are The
People for if you do this then next you argue whoever is actually sitting in
the office out of it thus if the Chief Justice responds? What is he going to
say? There is NO argument to mount against me as The People defaulted
first. Here you go: THE VOTE is paper, dead paper. In some cases it is
dead electronic blips. THE VOTERS is The People, the living constitutions
and the constitutionally set government of the US. The People defaulted
and what did the bush and gore lawyers go to court to then argue? THE
VOTE, the dead institutions of government. They argued for pieces of
paper as those votes then turned into court documents that then turned
into dollars. LAWYERS argued, LAWYERS were awarded custody of The
People and then LAWYERS waged an illegal foreign war, war against
women and children and war against the actual paper documents by then
attacking the Justices as what they needed to do is shake the faith the
People have in the Supreme Court. If you wanna disagree with me or tell
me that I’m wrong? You will have to undo history to then win or else I will
live to see the day you die which will be at by own hand as I’ll get a charge
of treason levied and then get a criminal conviction and so watch you die
when you are executed so it will be by my own hand.

38
58. This is where I am going to anger a lot of judges who read this: I’m gonna
go real slow and I’ll use very small words if necessary so you get it BUT: I
am the legal, acting President of the US. I am THE constitutional authority
of the US. The People defaulted, the officers defaulted and then the Chief
Justice defaulted. You know why? My argument wins as my clients are
The People for if you do this then next you argue whoever is actually
sitting in the office out of it thus if the Chief Justice responds? What is he
going to say? There is NO argument to mount against me as The People
defaulted first. Here you go: THE VOTE is paper, dead paper. In some
cases it is dead electronic blips. THE VOTERS is The People, the living
constitutions and the constitutionally set government of the US. The
People defaulted and what did the Bush and Gore lawyers go to court to
then argue? A VOTE, the dead institution of government. They argued for
pieces of paper as those votes then turned into court documents that then
turned into dollars. They argued a vote as they argued exact numbers.
They counted each vote. A vote. They also counted a vote for bush as he
voted for himself and a vote for Gore likewise. A vote is a piece of paper!
Not The People! LAWYERS argued, LAWYERS were awarded custody of
The People and then LAWYERS waged an illegal foreign war, war against
women and children and war against the actual paper documents by then
attacking the Justices as what they needed to do is shake the faith the
People have in the Supreme Court. First you shake their faith in the
Justices via BVG and other heinous acts like asking a Justice to go duck
hunting when you know you have a case that is to come before the Court
and then you can and will place an actual foreigner in the Office as
privateers have been trying to install Marxism since the early part of the
20th century. Install a Commander and if a war breaks out? Conditions are
perfect to then actually foreignize the office with a foreign born person as
WHO and WHAT starts most overseas wars? Nations protecting colonial
interests. Is your nation protecting a colonial interest? No, private interest,
oil. So what have you set the stage for? Private money buying the
Executive, as they need a person who will protect private interest as if you
protect The People by actually enforcing the law then you stomp out
corruption and w/o corruption then the rest of the world is on its own at
long last as the US citizens can no longer be used as slaves as their tax
base – their person - is supporting everything NOT constitutional and even
China but they can’t name it or why as it is so well hidden: 54 Wall Street

39
 in NYC? It was an actual slave market. All they did was dress it up
like a bank that lawyers then run.

59. Does Paul Zoss expect anyone to believe that he did not know we won the
Revolution not the federal court building and not the title of judge? Did he
expect anyone to believe that we never wrote the Constitution? Here you
go: Hey ladies, Paul Zoss says you’re crazy as we aren’t murdering you
and you have equal protection. He says that the Office of Executive is not
exclusively male nor is office of Chief Justice. You know what he says? A
male majority court with at least one man who’s appointment was never
legal and a male President along with a mostly male military did not
commit a crime when they ordered the death of an innocent woman by
awarding it to a man and then sat back and watched her die while they did
nothing. Guess what? The federal bench says that as long we don’t know
then it’s not murder so now they want more women to die in defense of
that ruling as once the cat’s out of the bag they might have to feel what
they are: GUILTY.

60. Slavery is back and how! Women and children have no rights unless
dead. Die, then Terry Schiavo has rights but not while she’s alive. Jessica
Gonzales’ daughters? Die, you still get no rights, as your mother did not
die. So ladies, if you want your kids to have rights let a man kill them but
make sure he kills you too as it is your right to die but not to live.

61. The lawyer riddled federal courts can go here: Paul Zoss, I am THE
authority. You said WOMEN and CHILDREN then THE PEOPLE did not
establish jurisdiction. Is there one single woman in Sioux City? I
established it. One child? I established it. One person who left default? I
established it. Wait: did you kill that one already? Okay, then we’ll put
PAUL ZOSS on the paper. Jurisdiction! And guess what kiddo? This is an
authority case against Obama and Roberts. Can it be heard anywhere
else? Nope as I said so and I’m both President and Chief Justice as of
11/09/09. Obama and Roberts defaulted. No matter how it happens if you
possess the SCOTUS docket showing this thus establishing it then
jurisdiction is anywhere but Washington, DC. At last count about 5 million
people left default. The first people came out of default when I received
direct action from SCOTUS as SCOTUS responded when the US never
did. As it was all legal and constitutional hen I began convening the legal

40
 government. See, when the US defaulted it was the sitting Officers thus
the Solicitor General, an officer, defaulted by failing to respond at all. I
then informed John Roberts via emergency application and Roberts (or his
agent) knew: The legal seat of government has just left DC as it goes
wherever Susan is as proof is life in an authority case. The living person,
the authority, is the absolute proof. It’s why William Marbury never got the
paper – he’s the proof and as no actual authority would ask Marshall for
the paper then Marshall said Go act and if you are harmed because you
do not have that paper, if a citizen needs to see it or an agent refuses to
honor the commission, then we will adjudicate the commission and
delivery will follow as you vested it by making your case. PEOPLE act not
institutions. No paper marries you; no paper liberates you; no paper
makes you human.

62. Knowing more about US law than anyone alive I then convened the
government. I could not recruit them – they had to come to me. I tacked
up a sign: Constitutional Authority Case of Original Jurisdiction 08-6622;
US Defaulted. Then I waited. The first time I was a government of one or a
nation of one; a people of one. The second? 3 citizens came out of
default. I told the clerks that the Creator was on my side actively protecting
me but they sad prove it. So I let them know: Jessie, Rich and Price. As in
branch off of tree and money; money tree! Are these men human? Yup.
One testified to the fact he had been raped by sitting officers and one told
me a great fact which is proof of life:

63. Has America been sold to the highest bidder? Price said yes as he was
informed of it by Alan Cranston, a dead Senator. He ran into Cranston on
vacation. He knew Cranston was a usurper and traitor. His blood was
boiling; he wanted to say something but his adrenaline was going and he
thought he shouldn’t and then he jumped as he said he could not fail to
act. He went up to Cranston and said, “Aren’t you Alan Cranston?”
Cranston smiled as he thought Price wanted his autograph. Price said, “I
just wanted you to know that lots of people know you’re a traitor. We know
what you’re doing and we aren’t going to let you do it.” Price said he now
knows what hate is and feels like and he does as he described it
accurately. You couldn’t describe it this way unless you actually felt it. He
said he saw Cranston’s face change and he realized he was looking at
evil. Actual hate makes you feel that way. He said Cranston’s face

41
 changed and he sneered and said, “Guess what? We already did it.” A
confession! I told Price about a law of this universe. I said that law would
work against Cranston and that as I met the Creator when I died that Price
did not have to worry. I said the Creator named in the Declaration is actual
reality. Price told me that he believed that the law I named is a law as he
may have seen it working and that too knew the Creator is reality: “Susan,
I knew something was up as exactly seven days later to the minute I heard
the news blurb ‘Alan Cranston dead’. I mean EXACTLY seven days as I
looked at the time. That had to be universal justice.”

64. So I had three people. Then I came to have more and more. At last count?
About 5 million with three million or so of those who will form a citizen
militia and march on DC to retake the institutions. We may have to take
only one: The Sioux City Courthouse as Zoss gave me a constitutional
reason: Barack Obama denied all natural born citizens informed consent
when he refused to reveal his birth certificate, passport records and
college transcripts. This violation targeted natural women who fully vested
their interest and right as they give birth to the babies who grow up to be
Presidents, Justices, soldiers, mothers. It’s also child abuse as it
grievously harmed his daughters as once you install a foreign born man?
Women will never, ever hold that office as it is death. So DC is out as the
officers defaulted, Obaam sat when in violation of the law (proof of death
as you can’t have the chief law enforcement officer violating the law to
then be able to sit or in violation of the law when he then sits) and People
came out of default thus the court may be in DC but should not be: There
is not one PERSON in DC; they’re all dead paper and dead titles and
dead buildings once they defaulted. DC does not even get a vote in
Congress but the officers gave it one against our will. There are no people
in Dc then except the Justices. All moral authority belongs to the people
as The People came out of default BEFORE Roberts. Under US law all
authority belongs to The People as only people possess will. Obama
violated the will of The People as anybody who voted for him is still in
default and some of them may be criminals. Sorry fellas! Sorry Europe!
Sorry banks the world over! Sorry corrupted dictators! I, Susan, nailed
Obama to the wall by filing 08-6622 on 10/06/08 and the US defaulted on
11/05/09. The day after the election. So there I was inside SCOTUS
waiting and....Obama seems to be the winner on 11/04/08 but will the
sitting officers, the US, then make it legal by requiring him to reveal his

42
documents? That won’t make it legal! By then Bob Bauer was already
fulfilling the oath of office as in all natural birth suits he person vying for
the office must appear pro se and Obama flunkies were spreading crap
about forged documents. That’s okay as I have a printing expert on hand
who worked for such institutions as the National Gallery of Art and I myself
know the person is proof. No paper on he planet proves natural birth. Your
mother’s testimony might. No wonder they chose a guy with a dead
mother. Well we have the grandmother saying he was born in Kenya. A
guy in another nation told me he was watching the show on TV via
satellite and saw it. He said when she said that Obaam was born in Kenya
they shut her up. Other people saw it on time delay and so that was taken
out. When he realized what he saw, proof as it came out of his
grandmothers mouth not any man’s mouth, he reported it. He said Nope, I
saw it live as I have no time delay. He said, Here are the satellite
coordinates. You can check them out to see if I saw it live or not. What
else do we have? We have a voter who chose to give natural birth to
himself in election 2008: He was born here and raised here in Baltimore
but knew nothing of how unjust this nation is until he was railroaded. He
thought judges used evidence and proof to find cases not a lawyer
suggesting, blaming and lying exactly w/o any case law, evidence or
proof. When he saw that the judge used things the lawyer made up in her
ruling? He couldn’t believe all you had to do was make up a fictitious case
while actual evidence, proof and case law and even the Constitution was
trashed completely. Why not? That’s BVG. He never knew until the judge
wrote: In custody cases where third parties seek custody over the mother
BIOLOGY counts for nothing. Not even if the mother almost died giving
birth to the baby and then contracted septicemia afterwards so could have
died from that. He then left default: He wrote my name on his ballot. So we
have one legal candidate and one legal vote. Time to prove natural birth.
Barack Obama then comes to The People as we do not go to him as WE
are the authority not him. You’re presumed to be innocent until you do
something that demonstrates you are guilty. Did Barack Obama do
anything that caused s to doubt his testimony? That’s my problem: He
never said he was natural born but he certainly acted guilty for as soon as
People began crying foul as it was obvious he was not born here or if he
was he was not raised to have faith in US law as he kept running from the
courts, refusing to release the records although that would have restored
trust so he is untrustworthy and dodging the question – innocent people

43
 run into the courts – he pulled a paragraph from his website. It said he
claimed dual citizenship. Proof, as he believed it was legal to do so when
it is not. His handlers said that he claimed he had it as a kid but it expired.
It’s okay if you’re a kid as you did not choose it. More proof, his own
handlers just confessed as that’s my point exactly: IF YOUR PARENTS
TAUGHT YOU THAT YOU COULD HAVE DUAL CITIZENSHIP THEN
YOU WEREN’T BORN HERE OR YOU WERE RAISED TO BELIEVE IN
SOMETHING FOREIGN OR NOT FOUND WITHIN OUR
CONSTITUTION.

65. Natural birth: You know you know I’m natural born and Obama is not?
Around age 8ish maybe 9ish blacks who want repatriation for slavery are
on TV. They want money. My father is agitated. “I did not do anything to
you. When are people going to get over this my grandfather did something
to you sh*t? African? You were born here so you’re not African.” I thought
that’s right they were born here. So what are we? “Are we Irish?” “No
you’re not! In case you don’t get this you were born here. People born
here are Native Americans. We’re all Native Americans if we were born
here. And if you weren’t born here? I have news for you: Who was? You
know what? Americans are mutts as we all came from someplace else.
Even people born here came here from another place...at some point you
have to give up all this Irish, African, Spanish stuff and decide you’re an
American.” Native American made perfect sense to me. And guess what?
I lived by one of the most sacred places on Earth: Cohoes Falls. Legend is
Hiawatha was grieving over the loss of his family in war and saw
Deganawidah walking towards him as if walking upon the water, and the
two then came up with the Iroquois Constitution thus the Confederacy.
Some say it came in a dream whole. Others say they walked across the
land working it out talking to people as they went teaching them to give up
canabalism. I went to school right next to the Falls and knew since I was
tiny, maybe four, to invoke my rights as a member of a sovereign nation:
VOTER. My sister told me that a man was arrested for defacing the flag as
he used it as part of a costume. He invoked his rights as a member of a
sovereign nation, an American Indian as the cops can’t then touch him. I
was astonished. “Wait one minute: you mean if the police are bothering
you that you can do something to stop them?” “Susan, all you have to do
is invoke your rights. If the cops or anybody else is harassing you then
invoke your rights as a member of a sovereign nation and tell them to

44
leave you alone. The cops can’t do anything they want to you. They can’t
violate your constitutional rights.” Okay! I invoke my rights as an
American! I could not believe you do this. They can’t touch me. I would
find out they can beat the hell out of you but if you’re Susan you will win
the fight and that people argue over Native as Native does not mean born
here. Somehow, someway I connected “Native American”, “sovereign”
and “Constitution” so that I was in my 40’s before I knew the citizens had
zero idea they are sovereign. You are all sovereign; the sitting officers do
not want you to know as they hide this to then control you. They write
books about it, argue it and talk about it but as nobody made the case
they pretend it is not the law. See, if you’re sovereign then they can’t tax
you for being born. Tax a person for being born? Death as that’s what The
Founders fought against as it made you the property of the King. America:
Today you are taxed for being born. It’s tribute. Think about this: what do
you now receive at birth? A social security card. For tax purposes. So you
get a state birth certificate and a federal death certificate in one day as
that SS form will then place you on the Social Security death Index
someday. Proof, as the fed kills you as soon as you’re born by the state so
you’re taxed for being born. Any kids you have? Born and killed. It’s
slavery only it’s sneaky. If the fed owns you they own you; you never
owned yourself at all. Well, Susan did as I liked the name Native
American. The facts of my life made it perfect. So I began invoking my
rights. Arguing law. I was arguing law as soon as I could talk but not with
constitutional authority. Now I had power! As no cop was gonna mess with
me. I had a secret but I did not know it as I knew as fact I was sovereign
but all the cops, federal agents and other officers that fell by my sword? A
federal judge finally told me: You can’t be this as I’m not. Right, as you’re
invoking federal judge and that’s NOT a named constitutional authority.
Moral authority is our Declaration; any federal judges sign it? In it? US law
tells The People what you can and may do: The People can and may do
anything they volunteer to do even be criminally prosecuted. Did you
commit a crime? Okay! You’ve volunteered to be criminally prosecuted!
The Constitution tells the institutions like ‘federal judge’ what they can’t do.
You can’t do a lot of things, as the institutions within the Constitution have
no moral authority as they are things not People and things have zero
human consciousness. Things can’t emote or reason. What placard with
“federal judge” on it can pick up a rifle and defend me? Does a judicial
robe walk around writing court rulings? People are born, people have

45
 ideas and people fight wars. We fought one over the vote. There was not
one federal judge placard fighting but there was a uniformed PAID woman
fighting; Deborah Sampson. Her family even got a pension in her name.
Ask Barack Obama to talk about himself; as him where he was and what
he was doing when he learned who and what he is. He might have some
trouble answering as if he needs to be Indonesian he is. If he needs to be
Muslim he is. If he needs to be Illinoisan he is. If he needs to be Hawaiian
he is. His minister is no longer popular? He leaves that church. He says
he’s black. His mother is white. “black” is an experience of life you have in
the US. Not once has Obama ever named it. He means color. He can’t
mean slave as his parents and grandparents weren’t. If he needs to be
Kenyan he is. But under the British crown. Didn’t we defeat the loyalists
once already?

66. The People have had it. I have too. Natural birth: A commercial ran in NY.
It was made in NY. I said, I was made in NY. My mother said, No you
weren’t. I said, Where was I made? She said, St. Augustine, FL. I wanted
to hear: My father got a severance check from he NY Central. He had two
jobs, as he was also a teacher. They bought a house and a travel trailer.
The first trip they took was to FL, during Easter. Before she left she was
joking with the other nurses she worked with and they warned her:
Whatever you do don’t drink the water or you’ll get pregnant. When she
came back she said they wouldn’t let her forget it, as she did get pregnant,
with me. So I ended up being born in Troy, NY. Where I went to St.
Augustine’s School. I said that’s funny, St. Augustine’s in FL and NY. The
hospital I was born in? The one my mom worked in, The old Leonard
Hospital. My mother should have paid more attention: her grandparents
were Susan and Leonard. So I’m Susan, born at the Leonard Hospital.
They used to tell women that line about water all of the time. But you know
what? How many women are told not to drink the water or you’ll get
pregnant and then they do in the home of Ponce De leon’s Fountain of
Youth, still flowing today? She should have known as the nation’s oldest
schoolhouse is there too: This baby will have a charmed life. But she
didn’t. Complete indifference, the opposite of love. Who on this Earth
could have a charmed life if she is treated with complete indifference? I,
Susan, as that indifference led me to rely and depend upon myself and the
Creator and later it allowed me to tell a federal judge gotcha, as that
means zero emotional investment so it’s proof – you’re unconstitutional.

46
 Reason w/o emotion. UNCONDITIONAL PRIDE. Nazi Germany. Hey Paul
Zoss: you wouldn’t be related to Hitler would you? Or did you just want to
make it sound so boring nobody would ever bother digging up the
complaint? Ask Barack Obama: Where was he created? What clues did
he have? Can we talk to your mother’s friends from work? The
neighborhood? In your life did you have to overcome complete
indifference? If Susan was driven to enforce he law whatever drove you to
violate it?

67. Natural birth: I have two natural born parents. They paid their dues and I
paid my dues. Does Barack Obama want to argue that makes no
difference? My parents taught me how to be American and this court does
not seem to grasp something: moral authority: In order to have the same
moral authority that I have (will pretend he’s as innocent as newborn
babe) Obama would have to have a baby, testify to the grief you feel over
losing a child and give testimony as to his death. There’s hope as Paul
Zoss read that mothers and service members in combat have the most
moral authority and then he said he was both as he attempted to stand me
down. Paul, you’re gonna have to show me your vagina, ovaries, fallopian
tubes, and stretch marks and then you’re going to have to testify as to the
birth process: what you felt.

68. Natural birth: Bob Bauer. Only in America: A lawyer needs a lawyer and a
judge who is a lawyer to then help him overcome the fact and law that a
woman gave birth to him.

69. Natural birth: The People told me that the Nobel Prize Committee sought
to legitimize Obama and/or make it harder for The People to remove him.
It’s both but do not worry as I’m on the job: I, Susan, wrote an essay in 7 th
grade that charted my life’s course. Every bit of it came to be save one
thing: A Nobel Prize for Peace. I had a specific idea. A while ago I heard
people complaining that the Nobel committee was acting upon what is
political. I had to worry as I wanted that last thing to come to be and I can’t
accept a prize if it’s political. Then Al Gore and the Climatologists
happened. Now that’s political. What, all I had to do was breach the
peace? Antonin Scalia told me: blame Al Gore as this never would have
happened if not for him. So is the Nobel Prize Obama won legitimate?
Most people went to laughing at what the Committee said he did. He did

47
not do that. Correct but: you’re Europe. You finally have what you want, a
foreign man and look – he’s black. You can’t give it to him for being the
first black President. Barack Obama: Nobel Peace Prize for Deceptive
Appearances. You can’t give it to the nation. I know a lot about the Prizes;
I placed the Nobel Prize in my first SCOTUS petition as I saw this coming.
Ready for the truth? Norway, I know what you did. You wanted to give it to
him for the vote. Give it to him to flatter the people. A justice warned me
about flattery. However you have a problem you do not know about: the
Nobel TERMS say you may not award this prize posthumously. You gave
the prize to Al Gore in 2000 – after the Republic fell and after Gore did it
thus you gave it to a dead institution. As Gore was dead? It’s a
posthumous award. Really, climatologists for peace? I’m looking. No new
peace yet. Lots of heated debate often leading to actual blows, volcanic
like eruptions between people. Then you gave it to Obama, another
posthumous award. It is posthumous as I hadn’t been heard yet and you
gave it to him after he died as he committed crimes to then gain entry to
the office (I’m the jury and judge if it’s martial law and it is; I read 511) and
as by giving it to him you gave it to the vote. The vote’s still dead but you
can’t give it to the vote as that’s The People, the nation. No nation can get
it. So it can only be that you gave it to him for A vote as he voted himself
into office via his decisions. As that’s the case? You gave it to Obama for
a piece of paper, a ballot. The paper ballot is dead as paper always is.
How many posthumous awards is this? This one breached the peace too.
You tell me, is it cruel and unusual punishment you are subjecting
Americans to? No, especially cruel as Watson and Crick stole some of
their work from a woman only as she died then she could not share the
award. Norway you can keep lying. Lie all you want. We’ll always know
the truth. This couldn’t happen if he wasn’t foreign. Nobody but nobody
works this hard to get around their own TERMS unless you’re a federal
judge thus you, Norway, have the vested foreign interest. As you violated
your own TERMS? Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize for making
war on the US and for violating the fully vested rights of all natural born
women and children and in so doing the Peace Prize Committee
committed suicide. The prize died. See? Your founder, Alfred Nobel, was
correct: Politicize it and/or award it posthumously and the award itself will
die. I could help you but I’m not. You had a choice, you chose to violate
your original intent, and nobody forced you to choose as you did: Me for
Peace for the Equal Rights case, me for Medicine for when and how life

48
 begins thus the right exists and me, Physics for Uniformity or: Obama for
crimes against humanity.

70. I could write and write and write. I know details and more details. All
anybody has to do is talk about their own person and how they came to be
who and what they are. Now Obama can’t talk? He can’t enter a written
answer and he can’t talk? A lawyer told me that it is routine for people not
to answer SCOTUS suits; that Obama didn’t have to do so. Nope, not in
this case. I asked: did you know in an authority case he must? This lawyer
said he never thought of that. Correct, so Obama and Bob Bauer are
taking advantage of that: As usually you do not have to answer a
SCOTUS suit then they won’t and hopefully The People and the federal
judge hearing it will not know that Obama had to answer it.

71. People who operate on power and control are using whatever works, as in
whatever they believe will manipulate and control the victim. Paul Zoss
reads a report by a detective regarding Obama’s birth and records and he
pretends he did not. He knows he’s in trouble as if he grants the motion
then men everywhere will hate him. But he’s not sexist so he has an idea:
She’s poor. I’ll use money. I’ll make her pay $455 for each complaint.
Then she’ll go away. Oh really? Let’s review: the US Military could not find
the thing they could use to scare me. They couldn’t rattle me, frustrate me
or so much as move me. The Us Military said, Okay, we can’t control and
manipulate her so they stood aside; If anyone can then you will. YOU
HAVE THE ABILITY NO OTHER PERSON HAS. The Supreme Court:
She got past us and now she made the sitting officers default. Okay, she’s
the one as we can’t control and manipulate her thus SCOTUS stands
aside. SHE’S THE FIRST TIME EVER IN HISTORY. But a federal judge
without any power or authority who couldn’t argue in SCOTUS on their
best day came along and say, “I’m the person who is going to take on
Susan and beat her into submission.” Paul Zoss must be insane then not
mentally ill as the US Military couldn’t do that but he can? How is Paul
Zoss gonna do that? He doesn’t get it: He isn’t a bastard? Oh yes he is as
women suffer from the effects of discrimination double, triple and
quadruple time and SCOTUS has ruled you can’t use money to deny
people entry but he cites money, when women earn less and when
Obama has all of the private money he wants. Like money was
accidentally chosen. I know what he wrote and he knows what he wrote.

49
72. If Paul Zoss ever said insufficient fact and no arguable basis in the law to
my face I’d beat the living daylights out of him. He did not mean that; he
meant money. So, pay you to then murder us? Without any criminal trial?
Ladies, big bad Paul Zoss says we are not being harmed and it’s not an
emergency. Let’s ask Terry Schiavo’s mother and the Pope as Terry was
Catholic and the Vatican might have to move on this:

73. 1st degree murderer Versus Terry Schiavo: In the US medical doctors,
those god-like paragons of mercy and compassion, said that it was
morally reprehensible to push the plunger of a needle thus execute a 1st
degree murderer, a man, but then that it was ethical to let an innocent
person, a woman, starve to death. The male able-bodied murderer then
lived if even for a day longer to cause who knows how much more harm
while the innocent woman who was not going to be able to lift a finger
against anyone so couldn’t cause harm was murdered. What’s wrong with
that picture? I’ll tell you what: not only is it proof men are playing a game
with our very lives but if those jailhouse doctors meant it then they would
have run to Terry’s side to help her.

74. Who do you want on the death panel deciding granny’s fate, FL doctors
who refuse to kill a 1st degree murderer as they feel it’s cruel or FL doctors
that can’t kill an innocent, handicapped woman fast enough as they feel
it’s kind? I was told “doctor” meant they are experts. Experts? Not one
doctor in this nation can tell you what is or is not going on in a persons
mind if she’s in a ‘vegetative’ state. They can’t talk if they are vegetative.
We can’t know as absolute fact w/o question. I know her state as I saw it
as I am an expert and it wasn’t vegetative. I saw what her mother saw.
You’d have to know it via life experience. But you said she was vegetative.
I believe your testimony; these doctors and lawyers – and you the judges
as you’re lawyers - testified to what you could NEVER know - it’s
impossible – so YOU committed 1st degree murder. I’d refuse to kill 1st
degree murders too if I was one by claiming 'as I am one it is unethical to
kill them via lethal injection' or "insufficient fact and law: We did not fight a
Revolution". That's clever: you argue their case sung a medical license
instead of a law license and do it in such a way The People have not have
any say as there is no courtroom. Some doctor says, "No, I won't obey
that order", an order of The People. But that same doctor will obey an

50
 order, an order a Justice issued but The People did not? Federal judges
refuse The People redress. Jefferson said it: Our repeated petitions fall on
deaf ears. So then: Women, if convicted of 1st degree murder, do then
have the right to life? Good, thanks for informing me as I always knew this
but needed your order as proof, as I'll shoot a federal judge if I have to but
plan it very carefully so it is premeditated beyond any doubt: I'll stand up in
court and say it but as you have always ignored and denied my testimony
I'll leave written plans and notes all over federal courthouses as I'll place
them within my complaints, those repeated petitions. Seems to me you
are royally screwed if I made it to SCOTUS as a pro se authority case
directly entered and directly acted upon as that makes me Judge and Jury
under martial law. I'll try my best to kill a federal judge IF a judge forces
me to do so to then receive an appearance in person but if I only wound
one? I'll tell the actual jury of my peers, other insulted and angry
People (as I know you'll knock yourselves out tying to find me guilty): "The
one and only thing I have any remorse over is the fact that I did not kill that
bastard so he could rot in hell sooner rather than later."

75. Justice? That is the truth so until I get it and until we then get it none of us
are going to stop and trust me – we are going to start shooting at some
point, as we will have no other choice. All the paper you want and need
is within this court already, attached to all of the cases Zoss illegally
and in violation of the law denied and dismissed.

76. The one and only thing protecting all of the federal officers is
secrecy. They do whatever they want to do to me and to all of The
People even when they know different as they are protected by
secrecy. Thus all I have to do is make it not a secret by acting in the
open. Any federal officer who reads this now as I already forced
direct action in SCOTUS thus changed everything so federal officers
know they must hear it in person and must adjudicate the
commission – to argue anything else like insufficient fact is to claim I
do not exist and neither does your own job as a federal judge which
is ludicrous – so that I can and may start taking names and I can and
may start shooting. If you exhaust the process and so nothing else is
left but violence our Founders said you can and may shoot. They
knew they might have elegant law but it is people who might be our
problem, people acting to violate the law in such a way that they left

51
us no choice but to shoot. Jefferson even warned: Marbury V
Madison is a good ruling but it can lead to an oligarchy and probably
will so if you ever get here - shoot a federal judge. Did he say,
“shoot a federal judge”? No but he did say dissolve the legal bonds
and then abolish something, whatever is the cause. That’s in
Federalist Ten: To address domestic violence attack the thing that
addresses the most effects. It does me no good to attack a piece of
paper; I must attack those responsible for it. So if federal judges are
the cause as they REFUSE to let The People appear in person, and if
federal judges are my own problem as they REFUSE to let me appear
in person ONLY as I outsmarted everyone of them, and if the reason
they can do this is secrecy, that their actions are buried on the
federal docket so nobody knows, then I do two things: file in the
world court located within DC and then pick a person who is a
federal agent and whom harmed me on or after 11/20/08 and shoot
them. In this way I do what the Founders told me to do and it is legal
as everybody knew but all chose to participate in what is criminal
and in my unique case? As only I have that SCOTUS docket only I
can and may and should escape any and all prosecution whatsoever.
I may not be charged according to our law and case law but the
officers will try it. A judge will want to do it to me eventhogh he
knows it makes him a criminal. I’ll then go to trial. Big deal. A jury of
my peers may not convict me and they won’t- not after I talk about
myself and how we all came to be within a federal courtroom with a
dead body – or severely injured body - and when every single
solitary authority in this nation knew as did millions of people who
were prevented from acting and as did the world as I filed in world
court. There’s only ONE actual reason for any of this: Susan Herbert
is the innocent victim and her nation - it’s officers – liked abusing
power and liked acting criminally thus wanted to kill her and needed
to kill her as she found them out and sued them successfully but
they could not kill her before she killed them via the lawful, named
process. Nobody is going to feel sorry for a federal agent. My life
story? People will be agog and aghast at how this nation’s and most
likely this planet’s most intelligent person was hounded since the
day she was born and beaten incessantly until finally her children
were kidnapped only to stop her from being who she is, or as the
Creator made her. That so insane are the patriarchs and their

52
 minions, women who support them only for the benefits they
personally receive like a title or money, that they would actively try to
kill Susan and even use her kids to do it only as her legal argument
meant no more unjust privilege and favor for the unjust persons in
office or the privateers.

77. Why would this court need to worry? I came here first, after SCOTUS,
so I’m taking your names and yup, you’re my number one targets.
You knew and you even had the piece of evidence an employee of
SCOTUS sent to me. You had even more knowledge but assumed the
risk regardless as if you’re invincible. I’m acting in self-defense. So
yes, you might be the person I or another citizen am forced to attack
to then secure justice. It’s not a threat; it’s the correct application of
the law, the equal protection and due process clauses among others
like self-defense and dissolution and abolishment. The other reason
this court needs to worry? If I go to world court? Which I am doing
so all you can do to stop me is to let The People inside their own
courthouse? I have something the world wants and needs: The
means to defeat China’s nuclear threat and then all corrupt
governments plus the world court would love, love, love to spill the
USA dirty little secrets by telling everyone. I’d only be the second
person to do this. Once that first person, Jessica Gonzales, went
here? Proof of death, proof the US had died as a Republic as justice
is not possible for women or children. Now all I do is then tell the
planet the real, actual reasons why which Gonzales couldn’t. The US
officers are the biggest racists and sexists on the planet; it’s not The
People it’s federal judges who would even inflict China on you only
to inflate their ego; it’s the sitting officers who are wife beaters, child
abusers and batterers. Why do you think I never gave the details of
my science away? I told you why: It’s so valuable. I have it and the
world needs it. Let a federal judge shoot himself as I can still get
around him or if forced shoot him myself thus finish the job he
started. And if I go on trial for that? Every citizen will realize they too
can and may now legally shoot a federal officer.

78. Nobody is ever going to believe the federal bench could not read. My
attachments: 1. SCOTUS suit 09-6777; 2. SCOTUS Petition for
rehearing 09-6777; 3. Federal Appeals Brief 09-10661; 4. Federal

53
 Appeals Motion to be reheard; 5. SCOTUS Petition 07-9804; 6.
Petition against Obama that Paul Zoss pretended he did not read; 7.
Private investigator’s report on Obama’s birth; 8. List of Records
‘wiped’ or ‘erased’ from Internet once Obama’s eligibility came under
question as the ACT to remove them counts as evidence rising to
proof. Some of these records are still available as people saved them
before anyone tried to erase them.

79. China, WalMart and Nazis to prove the political parties are mostly
responsible, that I do indeed have knowledge the world needs and that I
have indeed been acting in defense of the people thus this became
several cases in one as if I am the legal President? I am; I could take care
of all issues thus adjudicating the commission is the easiest way to do this
but the federal bench is demanding violence as if killing women via order
of the court isn’t violent, as if they aren’t guilty when they are:

80. This case, against the political parties, was filed as a prisoner’s motion or
so say the documents that were mailed to my home. It is not a prisoner’s
motion. The political party’s make me feel as if I am in prison but I’m not in
a physical prison.

81. It was dismissed. The reason it was dismissed is that I have not
established proper jurisdiction but nobody can deny Resolution 511 was
passed and so exists, Obama is sitting as President when he does not
qualify, no woman has ever been President or that the political parties are
responsible for this as it is not possible for a woman or a third party
candidate to be elected and a two party monopoly has created the legal
situation that logician Kurt Godel warned us about: There is a chink in US
law which allows for a dictator to rise, a nazi like regime – the thing that is
and does - backed by a small group of persons. I witnessed its birth. It is
inextricably inked to political parties and money and how they work – how
we elect Presidents in modern day America.

82. It’s also about how federal judges are appointed and for how long and how
the federal court is structured as we have created a legal situation
whereby the ethical cannot gain entry to the federal court thus dead paper
in the form of lawyers is given the standing. If you give standing to dead
paper only, to lawyers only, you are no longer Constitutional. If you refuse

54
 to hear the case for women then women have zero protection of the
Constitution. You cannot ignore the political ramifications of this as federal
judges are appointed by Presidents who have all been male and since
Andrew Jackson have all been Democrats and Republicans and that
almost all current federal judicial appointments are political – Reagan was
the last President to actually interview federal judges and most Presidents
never bothered - but even that does not stop the lawbreakers among us
from trying to circumvent the federal courts completely thus circumvent the
people completely with tricks like taking bad and even criminal legislation
to the House Judiciary Committee as that’s how you violate due process if
you’re Congress. The judge might not be political but the person
appointing him or her is acting upon what is. Proof would be this very court
as I named it as the only ethical courthouse I happened upon in America
as far back as 2007 and as soon as Obama was elected he announced he
wanted to restructure the federal courts beginning with this very court as
“important” decisions are arising from this court and so this appellate. In
other words: As these decisions would effect the illegally sitting Obama
and other Democrats then stop it by “restructuring” what already works.
I’ve looked and looked: Restructuring the federal court may not be a
purely political move but starting with this one is a purely political move.
Physics dictates Obama did not randomly pick this district; he picked it as I
said I was coming back here and the two party, overtly and even
exclusively male monopoly then makes it hard to defeat such tactics.

83. The overly broad power the two parties exert is overcomeable; you’re
supposed to be able to use the federal court to overcome it – sue for equal
protection and due process and to enforce the natural birth clause - but
federal court seems to be siding with the crooks: If you, the victim, are not
accorded your right of redress then you can’t overcome it.

84. I’m assuming then that this case was dismissed as it was inadvertently
filed as a prisoner’s motion as the passage of Resolution 511 signed by
both members of the Republican and Democratic Parties alone is cause to
sue, as it is obvious conspiracy and collusion as all 100 Senators can and
do read. This two party monopoly came to harm this nation in a gross
manner. It resulted in actual foreignization of the Office of the Executive
and caused the insertion of what is Marxist in nature. It along with the
discrimination of women is the main reason the Constitution has been

55
 overthrown which occurred when Bush V Gore was heard in a court of law
as Bush V Gore is the federal case w/o any actual claim or any actual
federal question as you fought a Revolution to win the vote so why do you
need to go to a court to adjudicate it? And it is the federal case that shut
out every person but Christian men who are lawyers and who are
Democrats and Republicans as lawyers not the men vying for the office
argued it and as no winner then goes into federal court only to chance
losing so changing the case from Gore V FL to Bush V Gore was meant to
deliberately shut out all voters but especially female voters, the injured
party, as no lone citizen save me was likely to be able to sue and
SCOTUS has never let a nonlawyer argue before it and has never let a
woman argue her own case no matter how good her case is. Proof is:
Obama is a Democrat and a lawyer who now claims to be a Christian
when he was raised Muslim. “Christian” is what the two parties demand
today.

85. I’m not the exception; I’m the actual product of The Declaration and
Constitution as I lived them out as real to test them. Anybody can possess
my genius if they apply themselves but you can’t take shortcuts: no lying,
cheating or stealing and no political party membership as the modern
parties ask you to pledge allegiance to them and their major donors not to
the Constitution aka The People.

86. Before I go on: I have alerted the Jewish Defamation League and the nine
Sioux tribes as they have a vested interest in this case. I had to serve
them. It’s not appropriate to object to the dismissal as it was filed as a
prisoner’s motion and as I attached the case to another part of Herbert V
Obama. You cannot separate Herbert V Obama from this case as this is a
constitutional authority case and you may not allow men to argue a
Presidential election masquerading as an equal protection issue when it
isn’t but then refuse to allow women entry to do the same when they do
have a good case and do have an actual federal question. Again: Obama
is a Democrat who signed Resolution 511 thus colluded with Republicans
to then violate the Constitution namely the equal protection, due process
and natural birth clauses thus he signed it when he had an
insurmountable conflict – it benefited his person - and this could not have
happened if the parties did not have a monopoly that is made impossible
to overcome as a citizen would have stopped them. Two hundred years

56
 later the Senate is mostly male and the Executive is exclusively male as is
the Chief Justice when women make up more than half the population. I
checked: all the Justices are party members. Nonparty members do not
even get on a list for consideration let alone in the front door. See
Katherine Harris out of FL as the Republicans turned on her and she lost
the office she ran for. 511 aids only men, only Democrats and
Republicans, only members of Congress and only foreigners at the
expense of women and at the expense of one exact woman: Susan
Herbert as she can, will and did preserve, protect and defend the
Constitution better than any American ever but as she refuses to
participate in what she knows to be criminal activity - an organized
political party and/or the purchase of an office - she is unknown and kept
off of the ballot.

87. I happen to be the PAC case David Souter was looking for when he ruled
he was sick of reading the same PAC case over and over as I lived it. It
involves the parties, women, WalMart who has this nations largest PAC,
discrimination, and their decision to begin funding local campaigns but
then naming GOVERNOR of CA as local and China. Swarzeneggar is
now Governor of CA; this is tantamount to WalMart announcing it will buy
the Office of the Executive in order to foreignize it as foreignization helps
large business at the expense of the People, as it is Marxism they are
trying to install.

88. Swarzeneggar then began appearing in the news and on the cover of
TIME as a possible Presidential candidate. This is a legal nightmare as
foreigners then shut out natural born women, protection of the Constitution
is stripped from us before it is ever accorded to us, and if you are ‘elected’
only as a PAC buys the office for you then your allegiance is divided and
in the case of WalMart we have a lot to worry about:

89. Because of the two party stranglehold that has now bankrupted this nation
China owns about $750 billion in US debt. If China calls in this debt the
US can’t pay it. China then can seize US interests, as it will attempt to use
its nuclear threat. Current world leaders keep caving to this threat.
However, WalMart came to my town, a military town, and threatened to
force us into frivolous litigation if we fought it so I took WalMart up on its
offer as WalMart may not force a military town nor women to fund their

57
 own injury as we are then funding the male monopoly on legal power in
the US, and more recently the overthrow of the Constitution, China’s
economic growth and its ability to harm the US as well as WalMart’s PAC,
again the largest in the nation, which seeks to elect anyone but ethical
persons and is WalMart exerting undue influence as it seeks to control
every sector of the nation not only the economy. See WalMart’s recent bid
to enter the banking arena.

90. It’s well documented and an entire movie, “The High Cost of Low Prices”
lays it all out: WalMart has been violating the Constitution left and right
and has been given special favor after special favor by the Republicans. I
entered an article stating that WalMart was warned that federal inspectors
would be at its store so it had unfair advantage. Lots of favor is granted to
WalMart. Currently it is in litigation – in federal court - over its treatment of
women as it pays them less than men and refuses to pay overtime wages.
It is common knowledge that WalMart acts in violation of the law. The
whole nation is aware of this. The federal judge interviewed for the movie I
named? She said that the WalMart lawyers lied, tampered with evidence
and created evidence; she said that WalMart behaved so badly and so
blatantly in her courtroom you’d think the people of Bentonville, Arkansas
lived in a different nation than the US. WalMart’s activities are not a
secret.

91. So when it threatened my town I said Fine as I know I have the PAC case.
The real, actual reason you are not to do business with communist nations
is that they can never, ever return the honor bond as they do not have any
honor, as they do not believe in God thus no higher, outside authority and
they contain the will and liberty of their people. If you contain the will and
liberty of your people you then contain or restrain your energy. Not only is
WalMart operating in China but it allows the Communist Party to run
branches in its Chinese stores thus it is forcing Americans to fund
communism.

92. I saw a Chinese town revolt. They took over city hall. But the leaders lured
them away from city hall with the idea of a vote that turned out to be a
ruse so city hall was turned back over to the criminals. What did the
revolting citizens forget to do? Make a set of keys! Well, if you live in a
town where WalMart is the only place to make keys and when you go to

58
 make them a communist party boss will be alerted then you might hang.
At lest twice Chinese citizens revolted and were crushed by their
“government” with force. All American is doing then is helping the
communists who are criminals but not any Chinese citizens and we’re also
harming ourselves as we can, never ever benefit from any business we do
with China and neither can any other person on Earth as Chinese
“government” exists today. It’s illegal to do business with governments
who state their intended goal is the US government’s demise as that
means they intend to murder The People.

93. This is criminal all of the time – Nixon never meant for us to do business
with China while they change nothing - and bad business all of the way
around but it is especially heinous when we are fighting an illegal war over
oil as what everybody is afraid of is that China will overtake a nation like
Iraq and so seize its oil reserves.

94. We do not need oil; it’s a fossil fuel that is limited in supply and we have
free energy sources but the two party monopoly which has an oil interest
refuses to fund them. I know as I’m a physicist. We have had free energy
sources as far back as 1940; the patents were removed from the US office
but still exist in the British office. I myself have seen the photos and they
look like the machine I have in my head as I live near the famous Coral
Castle of FL and I know how Ed Leedeskin moved the massive blocks of
stone he used to build the Castle. Most of these stones are larger than the
stones that make up the Pyramid and he used no modern tools. He said
any observant person could figure it out so I did some observing. He is
correct; the answer is in plain sight but then again I had an idea as to what
the answer was before I looked as a pyramid is on the back of our dollar
bill and I live on the St. John’s – one of the only major rivers in the world to
run north. All of this is arranged along lines of electromagnetic force and
your blood is iron based for a reason: You mimic the design of Earth and
then the universe. The Constitution does too as it accounts for the God
consciousness and then human consciousness as men congress with
other men but conspire with God; men do not congress with God.
Commune with God yes but congress? No, as a 1st person meeting with
your maker tends to be one sided as there’s no debate.

59
95. Like male scientists must step back and look at the whole universe as
parts all working together – this solar system revolves around something
and then this galaxy revolves around something; it’s not lone planets
revolving around the Sun - so must federal judges when they look at this
case or our government, as it is absolutes that also work as wholes and
then all of it is within itself, as you have a constitution, you are a
constitution and you’re in a Constitution. You have to be able to step back
and so reason America as a part of the history of Earth, going smaller and
smaller until you’re at the smallest particle: A lone voter. We collected the
entire human record via collecting people from all over the planet. Then
Americans collected the whole of Earth at once as went to the moon and
looked back from upon the moon’s surface. I can reason anything around
the Earth, in terms of human progress, and as to its place in the universe,
as I know history and I know the law. I know people and people are dipole:

96. They don’t say a bad lawyer has gone south for nothing. He’s dead, as our
compass as a living nation points to true north. I also know a lot about
China, a dead and deadly government, so I began to think of the Chinese
saying regarding an impossible balance existing between life and death,
as we are a living government that is dying. I knew I could achieve that
impossible balance with my vote. So I began to do it via federal lawsuit.

97. Realizing we have to deal with things as they are not as we want them I
then had to deal with WalMart due to its PAC, China and the political
parties ignoring the Constitution and acting as if it does not apply to
women and neither does Marbury. Lucky for me the two parties were
injuring me left and right and I know something China does not about
energy and nuclear chain reactions. WalMart has two choices: Go out of
business or start obeying the law. 1st, I can save them millions in litigation
in the case involving women as I tangled with those attorneys and found
them to be unethical. They are not in it to help the victims but to line their
pockets as there is a very simple argument you can make against
WalMart to win and all the attorneys had to do was give up the exorbitant
fees they are charging. 2nd, I can defeat China and its army plus its
nuclear threat with physics as China cannot carry out its threat...with my
knowledge China would be made to think I snuck into its version of the
Pentagon and stole all of its secrets. China does not know something
about nuclear chain reactions that only I know. I already tested and

60
 proved it as law. And once I disarm China? Then it can’t threaten to seize
US assets and/or we can voluntarily settle that debt.

98. Without giving too much information away to China it has to do with an
element nobody thought to factor in that became obvious to me. I have
talked to survivors of Hiroshima and I visited White Sands on the one day
a year it is open to the public. I lived in Truth or Consequences, NM near
Socorro where the men who worked at White Sands were stationed so
met some of them. I’ve been looking at nuclear reactions since I was 16.
Once I won a debate over the nuclear question and guess what I know
now? My science was all bad as I relied upon the work of others that
seems as if it is good but it is not. I have been living in America for 42
years thus witnessing its slow death. Most of the science in textbooks is
bad science and lying to our children is one reason we are in decline.
“Science” – what is a law is not up for a popular vote but we started voting
on it. Would we ever vote upon if a black person is a human? We vote
upon if a woman is human all of the time. For instance, I can prove that
you never truly split an atom or smash a particle so that you do something
else when you set off a nuclear chain reaction that causes harm; that
nuclear power is not the way to go as you cause damage you aren’t aware
of - yet. It only seems as if we split an atom and we know particles reform
after being smashed. Science, based upon appearances only, reasoned
and collectively decided, “We can split the atom”. No, as you are never
actually splitting it; it only seems as if and that appearance is very, very
convincing but it is not reality; you don’t split it. Compare it to never being
separated from the Creator or if you’re American never being separated
from the government as you are the government: It only seems as if some
of us are above others due to titles like President but we all have one vote
so really we are in a row as links in a chain. So I had to go back to square
one and redo all of the science as men have gone off the deep end
making what is simple extremely complex as they are guessing but they
make their guesses and their wrong answers sound great. They’re like
lawyers when it comes to language. Science hit a dead end for the same
reason US government did: No women. I’ll give you an example as I know
what you’re thinking, if she’s this brilliant why haven’t I heard of her?,
discrimination and the exact injury I suffered that’s why: Take the very well
known two slits experiment. A scientist shoots a photon at a piece of
paper with two slits in it. The photon lands on the other side of the paper

61
 forming a pattern of stripes. The scientist can’t figure out what he’s looking
at. Science scratches its head. It’s obvious to me: Photons travel as both a
particle and wave at the same time; you’re seeing a photon move as both
and you’re seeing what happens when a photon, energy or light, travels
THROUGH space. The slits are like space; you move through space, as
space is the stuff in between the particles of matter. You’re observing what
time travel looks like as it is through space but within time. You’re
observing what it looks like to travel from point A to point B a la Star Trek,
through space and within time as all time is now. If you remove the paper
with the slits the photons land in what appears to be a chaotic nonpattern
as it is chaos; w/o any matter what would you travel between? As it’s all
space! I’d tell you more but I’m not giving what I know away. So for years
men looked at the two slits experiment and had no clue while I looked at it
once and knew the answer. There’s even a simple experiment you can
conduct to test this. It’s like this case: You have to stand back and look at
the whole thing not only the parts. They all work together. Men
concentrate on single absolutes; it’s harder for them to see the whole
picture. Men read “WalMart” or “Obama” and become afraid, as they can’t
see the whole argument for what it is. Like the case for equality unites us
all the case for uniformity unites it all; you can’t separate the government
from the universe, as it is one and the same. The models work the same.
Politics, China, WalMart, the Executive, PACS, women - it’s all related.
It’s US science that I copyrighted and patented on behalf of the US by
going to SCOTUS first as US government is a science that China and no
other nation has, as it is exclusive to the US. It’s science so advanced that
will make the advances made in the 20th century look like child’s play.

99. So you never heard of me as I knew college had nothing to teach me so I

taught myself and I gave up money in lieu of justice as I could have sold
what I know and made a fortune. I gave up billions only to rub it in
France’s face as they owe me a war debt and they insisted that the seat of
particle physics left the US for France. I wrote to France: “It only seems
that way due to Clinton, Bush and Obama but as I’m still here and I
patented what I know in SCOTUS? Like the seat of legal power goes
where I go the seat of particle physics gores where I go.” Actually I gave
up billions for women and children – male and female children; I had to
fully vest my commission as a right by going to SCOTUS first. Beating

62
 France to the punch with only pen and paper and not a giant particle
collider was a fringe benefit.

100. One of the things that hinders scientific advancement is politics. Like oil
companies not wanting to go out of business so they suppress new
energy sources. With WalMart China, WalMart is helping China create a
need for oil so it competes with the US making all prices and taxes rise so
then causing us to fund our own injury as the US keeps selling its debt. It
becomes a vicious cycle. WalMart even sells gas now. And China is
notorious for its human rights violations – exactly what WalMart does here.
And if WalMart funds your campaign you aren’t going to act against it, are
you? So WalMart and the US are at a tipping point as the US is turning
Marxist and woman is the crux as woman is the mistake of the past the
US has insisted upon making as in it refuses to elect one to two positions
only and the Republicans and Democrats are responsible as are PACS:
Chief Justice and President. That then creates a glass ceiling for all ethical
citizens not only women. What you have is people who want to be able to
violate the law versus those who want to enforce the law. WOMEN have
the vested interest when it comes to enforcing the law as we’re the victims
and we give birth. But men run most businesses and so keep women out.
Women are forced to compete with a current effect of discrimination
harming them: Men control most of the money as well as most of the
offices.

101. The lawsuits that will be coming before the courts could cause WalMart
and other companies to go bankrupt as they could be shut down
completely or if ignored the situation could cause us to be invaded by an
actual foreign army and we might lose. We are in the throws of death,
exactly like Rome and Greece. You can say Bill Clinton played the
saxophone while Rome burned as at times we exactly mimic the fall of
Rome and Greece – look at our Senate collecting tribute and our utter lack
of godliness as well as our seeming acceptance of rape and sex with
minors - and that is because only we came up with a way to survive such
a fall so we’re living the past out but with awareness – we can check the
historical record thus compare ourselves to it - and so I know: A woman
nonlawyer must do it as men can’t give birth to babies. Women protect
children not men. Men disempower them to then be able to cause harm
and once you target your children? You’re dead. Are we not causing our

63
 children’s deaths from violence and obesity? People are now permanently
injured as children. Check the record: A large population in Mexico died
out when their children failed to thrive thus began dying around age 5. As
men do not give birth the interest is not theirs and that is partly biology as
birth forms a permanent bond so that a mother knows her children
anywhere under any conditions. You want to act now before you pass the
point of no return. Usually that’s a natural disaster, as with corrupted
government you can’t overcome the effects of such a disaster. See
Hurricane Katrina. So the effects after a disaster like contaminated food
sources then kill you as government can’t meet the need and children die
first; as you’re weakened? You can’t give birth to healthy babies. You
physically die out as a People. If a disaster doesn’t do it invading armies
do as in you lose the ability to defend yourself. You’re assimilated or
killed. Your nation is no more. As no disaster has hit yet and no foreign
army is in striking distance and there’s still something to be salvaged the
time to act is now:

102. Nothing anyone has proposed is an actual solution, as they are not
targeting the actual cause. Corruption in a constitutional nation that turns
criminal? That is a symptom that the end is near; it’s a worst-case
scenario. It’s like drug addiction – by the time a person takes drugs the
disease has progressed to an advanced stage but you do not realize it
until you see the effect, a person on drugs. We’re money addicts; we’re
power addicts; we’re fame addicts. You see the effect when it turns
criminal, usually when you’re a victim you finally admit to the truth of it, but
it sets in long before it is ever realized in the physical. It’s generational and
endemic, as it seems as if we hit a dead end from which there is no
escape and that this generation will not do as well as our parents and
that’s first. We’re measuring the wrong thing! We became addicted to
outside authority instead of constitutional authority so all of these outside
things run us. Our law reads “the pursuit of happyness” for a reason: It has
nothing to do with the pursuit of money as money is not real but only has a
value as you assign it worth in your head; you decide to accord it value;
you believe it has value but it doesn’t. Subjected to crooks and criminal
activity w/o relief? The People lost the human ability to know liberty as
they lost the ability to feel it and once that happens? No justice. It’s made
impossible as it is like losing a language. You need people who speak it
and if you’re a Constitutional Republic you need people to live it, one at

64
 the top and at least one voter on the bottom as you actually stand
shoulder to shoulder as hierarchies are a convention your mind creates as
they help you rationalize the suffering you experience. Go look: there’s
no hierarchies in the Constitution so why do you obey them? Your
terminal, that’s why.

103. Closing WalMart by establishing it aided and abetted China, our

enemy, and purchased offices here places you in a worse position so
shutting WalMart down is not reasonable. Lots of people are lobbying for
WalMart’s instant demise. If they argue it correctly it’s possible as I did it.
You have to deal with each issue going back and forth as you’re
addressing cause versus effects; you slowly sort it all out by tackling the
biggest bullies. WalMart allows me to take on all things political in the
wrong way, the way our Founders never intended. Once WalMart
threatened my town I had them, China and the political parties as my town
board composed of Democrats and Republicans announced it would
violate our will, violate our vote, as it was made to be afraid and we
happen to have a Chinese sister city. The person who is now the mayor is
a woman who said she changed her vote to YES as she was made to be
afraid; that’s domestic violence as she was actually threatened and
intimidated. Why she’s our mayor I can’t tell you, as I don’t vote for people
who cave to threats but I had no liberty thus no choice. But we know that
domestic violence is endemic as it is condoned upon a federal level by
federal judges – SCOTUS refused to hear the case for women which
involved domestic violence at least six times, five for me no matter how it
happened and once for Nicholson V Scopetta, plus Bill Clinton committed
domestic violence when he perjured himself regarding a sexual
harassment case and when he won a Presidential campaign by insisting
that all the women coming forward to testify against him were “bitches”
and were lying. We also watched the Senate try to conduct a criminal
hearing when both Thomas and Anita Hill were before it, then we had
Bush V Gore which targeted women as w/o BVG then no Alito and no
Roberts – Bader-Ginsburg would become Chief after Stevens. And
Roberts is VERY young; you have to ask if Dick Cheney meant to harm us
from beyond his grave? My true belief is YES. But thus far federal courts
seem to be afraid of Dick Cheney and his minions which is how I ended up
at a political rally but felt hate as I witnessed the ghost of Hitler awaken
before my eyes and Americans did it: The officers of this nation have run

65
amok as businesses and political parties have been allowed to run amok,
even inside SCOTUS. Twice Bader-Ginsburg stood down the male
majority in the cases of women as she said their reasoning was
unconstitutional as it made men an authority over women as if women had
no authority over their own persons whatsoever, as if men owned them.
She forgot to add we never had legal power and that second time? You
act, you tell Roberts to stand aside as twice is no mistake. But this is a
first for the US. It’s possible the justices are as ignorant as The People
meaning they can’t know something. So domestic violence is endemic and
federally perpetrated, it is, thus it is a violation of Article 4 Section 4 as
BVG is a political question disguised as an equal protection and due
process issue. It’s not even possible for BVG to be EP & DP if you’re a
man or a member of the two major political parties and you use a
lawyer who is not you! And it is tribute, it is akin to annointing a
Caesar type leader, as WE fund the federal court but were shut out
once the case caption became Bush V Gore. It’s a purely political
and privately funded coup. It’s why they asked two questions. So, when
I heard my mayor say she was changing her vote on the local news I did
some digging: I stopped digging when the US officially announced you
would need at least one billion dollars to RUN for the office of Executive
and then published that finding. It’s in my first attachment. I went directly
to WalMart with my legal argument as foreingization was already
underway and as I had to stop WalMart immediately not in a few years. So
by sending it to them I stopped them from building, which proves it is a
good argument and proves I knew foreignization was already - long
before I ever knew Obama’s name. I always knew I could come back and
use the argument to end what PACS are doing by using my person as the
missing link to then connect it all as while it seems to be complex it is not
once you know all of the parts like how much US debt China owns. It’s as
if I’m ground zero as I can answer any question you have and as this case
can never be made on paper alone as the case is about life being proof.
WalMart wants and needs to recognize my authority as not only can I
protect it from China and save it millions in litigation but as a private citizen
I can sue to own and operate WalMart but as the constitutional authority I
can’t. A President may not seize a US business but a private citizen may.
WalMart can never, ever get around its PAC and what it does to elections,
how it caused a once open system to become a closed system and how it
caused harm from the lone citizen up to the Executive thus incapacitates

66
 The People. It actually stems from a local level, their employees, up to a
national level, their PAC, and then international, their treaty with China; it’s
a form of Marxism inserted and then enforced by favoring what isn’t
constitutional over a long period of time no matter what excuse you use.
Reasons do not matter. You can only cause so much harm before it all
comes crumbling down and it did but in this case there’s a way to avoid
the worst damage. WalMart needs me to survive what’s coming up in the
future as it has done as much damge as can so now it will only harm its
own self and the US needs me to survive China. WalMart actually has a
vested interest in my appearance and me, as do all ethical citizens as I
can restore us after the fall. I know how.

104. Like you can’t close WalMart abruptly you can’t end all political party
activity. You can end one kind of politics but not the other. I address that
later.

105. It is silly to be afraid of discussing our mistakes or maintaining the

status quo to then maintain no order, as lawlessness is no order at all.
Looking back over our mistakes is how I came to answer the questions the
Founders asked including Madison’s “What exists at the founding of any
great government?” And sometimes you have to go down a road to then
have an answer thus you will have dead ends BUT the Founders never,
ever meant for you to install or insert an institution and then refuse to
remove it once it caused harm. Federal courts and other institutions have
zero business tying our hands in any way. I blame a 1920 federal court
ruling never overturned and meant to target blacks, women and Natives:
The federal court ruling that says policy may not be litigated unless you
can prove injury has occurred so it essentially forces you to become a
victim before you sue a politician like a President for unconstitutional
policy only now the injury that is realized first especially for women and
children is death so you then can’t sue, can you? This ruling is political in
nature as it was then exploited over and over by administration after
administration. It might not have originally been political but it is now.
NOTHING in the Constitution allows for victimization and policy is
something you can reason as legal or not. No policy is ever gray rather
than black or white. That’s a mistaken belief politicians want you to
possess so you’ll go along with just about anything they propose. And if
you’re kept out of court? You are forced to be a victim. This is where it can

67
 become convoluted as federal judicial appointments are mostly: Political.
Is the conflict one we can overcome? The results so far say No, federal
judges aren’t willing to set politics and/or prejudice aside. Thus I’ll make
yet another attempt:

106. Federal judges: I, Susan, will have to break this to you as I did to John
Roberts: If you truly believe you were appointed for your talent get a new
belief and soon as you weren’t. You were chosen for the federal bench
based upon things and reasons other than what you’ll find in our
Constitution. I have no idea if you’re fit or unfit; all I know is a politician
thought he could use you. This is why you can’t look to any outside thing
to then grant you approval as only you know what you are or aren’t and
once you award your custody to any outside person or thing? It has power
over you. At the end of the day and your life you answer to yourself and
your maker and account for it all including every thought and feeling. You
might escape punishment on Earth but the Creator will judge you and he
knows exactly what you were thinking and feeling when you authored a
ruling. Nobody else has a say when your case is before The Creator so
why give them power over you, to judge you or to cause you to be judged,
while on Earth? What you need to understand is that the persons who
appointed you as you were picked were not interested in your ability; they
were more interested in how you might rule in certain cases. They believe
they can profile you thus predict how you’ll rule. They believe you’ll
subconsciously rule for affiliations you have with them. They expect that
you’ll feel grateful so act it out on paper. You then are accidentally playing
into their hands as The People do not realize that you have no idea this is
about what others believe about you, what a person reasoned and
decided is the truth of you, not what you actually believe and not what you
actually are so when you cater to lawyers and refuse to give the citizens
standing? It seems as if you are working for the politicians. The one and
only way to prove your actual beliefs and actual ability is: Within your
rulings, by hearing The People. It’s not as if we fear losing it’s that we are
not even given the opportunity to lose as we aren’t allowed to appear. This
fatally diseased government? When you empower lawyers at the expense
of citizens you then empower the politicians – the guys who appointed
you. The politicians need the lawyers to execute their corruptions of the
law. Lawyers enter your courtroom intending to play a game with the silent
understanding you’ll let them go so far before reining them in so they

68
calculate the damage they need to do. Nobody in your courtroom and
nobody who read your name on any list has any actual respect for your
ability – it’s a lie perpetuated by ego. It seems as if you do it with
deliberation as you can’t fathom that you were chosen to sit for any reason
but justice; it’s not possible federal judges are picked to then force certain
rulings. Newsflash: If all of your fellow judges had ability and had the
intention of ruling according to the Constitution would we be in this mess?
All you can do then is act for yourself and so separate yourself from the
pack as at every hearing it’s a form of peer review as it is supposed to be
about The People not the lawyers, not the politicians and not the
privateers so as you shut us out you then have snakes reviewing you
currently. What kind of validation is that? How can you ever measure
yourself or set your compass correctly if actual snakes are your measure?
Your perception is skewed but once you own up to the fact you were
flattered into believing the guy who hired you chose you for your ability
when he did not? You’re liberated from that. How would you feel if you’re
Roberts? I saw Roberts with Bush and I heard Bush. Then I read those
signing statements. Bush did not write them nor choose Roberts as he
couldn’t. WHO believes it when a man without any legal ability says he
admires yours? I would have had a question for Bush: why me? Tell me
why. Think of the politician who appointed you. Do you truly believe he
himself found you? Do you truly believe he read one of your rulings and
screamed, “Find me that man as he is this nation’s greatest legal
mastermind!”? The truth is: He sat at a desk while somebody passed him
a list and went over the pros and cons of that list. “Professionals” compiled
that list. YOUR name came up. It could be any fact of you but it is not
ability as the last thing any crook can have is an independent,
constitutional federal judge. These people look for perceived flaws. Who
cares? It’s a lifetime appointment and now you get an opportunity to
become Eisenhower’s Warren to whomever appointed you: The worst
mistake he ever made. If you were hired for a reason other than ability, if
someone looked at you and for whatever reason said “This one’s
mediocre; he won’t cause any trouble” then you exact the sweetest of all
revenge by proving you actually have ability. Once you shatter the illusion
that you serve anyone but The People? You’re liberated from the
institutions. Discovering you were picked as you’re black or as you’re a
woman or as you’re Catholic isn’t so bad as physics dictates if your name
was not your name or you didn’t major in sociology only as you liked the

69
 textbooks you would not be sitting so who cares how you came to be
sitting as EVERY FACT OF YOU COUNTS EVEN IF THOSE WHO
APPOINTED YOU DO NOT KNOW IT. You have the edge then and
always did as you know all of your facts but they do not! Thus you can and
will overcome the conflict created by the confluence of private interests
and politics.

107. If you look at my very first SCOTUS petition you will see that I named
1952 and Richard Nixon’s “Checker’s” speech as my point of causation as
every single element was present: China, Nixon, a brand new Chief
Justice chosen from the outside, crafty language, speechwriters putting
words in a presidents mouth, blaming women for what men do and illegal
campaign funding in the form of a secret war chest the republicans
amassed. At this point, as that money was meant to stop women and
blacks from exercising legal power as a block as they were now voting as
such for the first time, it became impossible for any women to overcome
the unjust, corrupted systems and the money as women have such a large
disparity that is yet enforced today by denying them legal power. It’s
important that I named Nixon and 1952 as my point of causation after the
Revolution as reasoning that led me to know if China ever harmed me
here, in America, then I had my point of intrinsicity as it was only made
possible by political parties and their policies plus privateers as in private
money, that war chest, and foreigners with foreign interests who are
allowed to run this nation from behind the scenes. Nixon and China, so I
knew on the day WalMart made its announcement that I needed to act as
every element came alive: That very next morning at 8 AM I phoned
SCOTUS and was injured as my rights were violated and then I phoned
the Navy and my rights were violated. I entered my phone bill so it’s on the
federal record. This covers both President and Commander then thus
made it possible for me to adjudicate the commission as the Navy exactly
said it was injuring me and not assisting me – it was not recognizing me –
as they wanted me to actually stand down the President and/or Chief
Justice and so return with the actual paper commission. It matters not if
the Navy violated the law; the action alone vests the right and interest and
the proof is that I phoned the Navy and worked the chain of command until
I spoke to a Commander as who does that – who can - if she’s not the
legal President BUT the Navy informed me it needed to see the actual
paper (or witness me appear and so hear me do it) after the SCOTUS

70
 clerks announced they would forever withhold it form me and all women.
This then created a legal situation whereby the in violation of the law
withholding of the commission, living and dead, MUST be adjudicated
according to Marbury as the Navy said if not for that then they would not
be injuring me or any woman. That alone made the commission a part of
my defense but I kept placing it on the court record when I could most
recently in person in NY as I stood as the actual defendant and any case
of constitutional authority is then both offense and defense as you are
defending yourself and the nation by going on the offense as you aren’t in
violation of the law – they are. I so knew China was the point that proves
our death I later wrote to SCOTUS: “MacArthur left my commission
somewhere near the 38th parallel.” What happened then? North Korea
than began to threaten us with nuclear weapons. That’s because I am
correct about China and my ability to defeat it; my person is lining up with
the law or truth of the universe. As the problem seems so large and so
deeply embedded everybody, mostly men within the institutions like the
NY Appellate or FBI, denies it exists and ignores it. The People are
labeled “conspiracy nuts”. Or no woman can be an actual genius. I get, “If
you are so smart why aren’t you rich and famous?” all of the time. But I
hear something else: Politics as everybody’s afraid of the ruling class.
They’re afraid to upset the applecart. You may not and you cannot deny
the truth:

108. Once Sol Wachler was removed for pleading out to domestic violence?
Justice in NY was impossible, as the entire government has fallen once
the Judiciary has. Usually your judiciary is the last branch to go but in NY
the judiciary fell before the Executive, as Spitzer was able to hide his
actions for so long. That’s it, as he hid them from the public but not his
party or other state employees. Party leaders told Vanity Fair they knew
something was up with Spitzer as I read and then entered the article.
People know but fail to act or cover it up – for political reasons. You can
remove Wachler and then even Spitzer; you still have a situation whereby
justice is nonexistent as you must remove everyone under them as they
hold the top offices that can and may invoke the power of one over the
citizens. There’s nobody after them but SCOTUS but I knew as Clinton fell
and then Bush V Gore was heard that SCOTUS was a waste of my time –
frivolous – as if SCOTUS installs a President are they likely to then
remove him? No as that would constitute SCOTUS pleading out but it’s

71
possible if the Justices are ethical only in my unique case I had to deal
with Thomas, Alito and Roberts and they made it frivolous as politics and
the Senate’s hatred of women interfered with the Thomas nomination,
Alito is a man when plenty of qualified women were overlooked to
maintain a male majority and Roberts is a politically motivated
appointment meant to prevent Bader-Ginsburg from becoming Chief after
Stevens. It was very easy to go back and check the record – the facts like
names, dates, times, places and exact words – and so put this together.
It’s not my opinion but history. You can never, ever make the claim that
Roberts was anything but a politically motivated appointment and another
blow in the long series of assaults that SCOTUS has suffered at the hands
of the parties as they shut the citizens out so the only people entering
SCOTUS are lawyers affiliated with the parties or with a political agenda
which is why terrorists get in and women do not. The tactics they use are
meant to be direct attacks upon SCOTUS as the people responsible
meant to shake our faith in the Constitution. You accidentally asked a
Justice to go duck hunting when you had a case coming before the Court?
It’s meant to strip all power from The People. The only point in entering
SCOTUS on paper then if you know as absolute fact justice is made
impossible is to vest the right and the interest as entry in person is never
going to happen as SCOTUS clerks told me they’d keep me out. No
matter how I reasoned this for authorities they insisted if you removed
Wachler you had justice magically restored and when WOMEN NEVER
HAD IT TO BEGIN WITH. Not one person understood reality, chain of
command or authority thus once SCOTUS installs a President you are
screwed as you go to SCOTUS before you go to the Whitehouse not
after!!! If you go to SCOTUS after you go to the Whitehouse via the vote?
If you bring the Whitehouse before SCOTUS? A crime has been
committed as that’s the only possible way this happens as what is after
the Whitehouse? The People, The People come after the President not
SCOTUS so if you bring the President or Whitehouse into SCOTUS after
that person or administration has been elected by The People, people who
now are denied standing as SCOTUS never granted it to anyone but
lawyers and seeks to maintain SCOTUS certified lawyer as a special
honor and privilege so SCOTUS is worshipping dead paper, then you
have handed this nation over to LAWYERS hired by POLITICAL PARTIES
as you have come to your end as there’s no place to go after SCOTUS. If
you can’t get inside SCOTUS you won’t get inside the Whitehouse and if

72
 you can’t get inside the Whitehouse? You own it and fund it so it’s
criminal, as that case never, ever should have gained entry so how did it?
And what did Susan know that nobody thought was relevant? Greg
Rinckey, the lawyer who lost my case with deliberation and admitted it all
over his brief which he signed and entered against my will and w/o my
consent, was assigned to my case as he is exNavy and SCOTUS
certified! He’s got a Service Cross or so I was told that I want returned. So
if the Navy did not peg this creep for who and what his character actually
is and SCOTUS certified him no matter how it happened justice is made
impossible for any citizen as obviously politicians or worse lawyers who
are politicians are certifying each other in a massive conflict of interest that
dates back to 1790. Doesn’t Congress award medals like the Service
Cross? You need two signatures to be certified on paper according to the
SCOTUS rules or you need to gain entry directly by filing pro se – I
reasoned the latter – so when I tested the system by attempting to secure
those two signatures? I could not get one – not even after I entered
directly on paper! Congress merely pretended I never asked. So then: I
had zero opportunity, the political parties are guilty and today anybody can
buy a diploma online and get those two signatures thus enter SCOTUS –
if he or she knows somebody via political affiliation. Would I have said
what I said in PA if I knew SCOTUS was going to keep me out
unconstitutionally? If I knew justice wasn’t even possible? You can’t ignore
the politics of upstate NY or that Garrett Murphy is a Democrat and the
National director of Literacy for NY. I prove the injury ran up and down the
chain of command in such a way it is reverberating and so doubling,
tripling and quadrupling back.

109. The real, actual reason you never go to SCOTUS (or any federal court)
after you go to the Whitehouse? If it already happened as in BVG you go
back to federal court only as you wrongly went there and must undo BVG
to restore law and order but: Ideally you never take an election there as:
The place to go after the Whitehouse stands before SCOTUS is the US
military. You seize Command of the Armed Forces as I did and retake DC
in order to retake possession of the original documents, the paper
commission belonging to The People. Then you retake all of The People’s
property like Congress and the actual Whitehouse. A presidential election
decided in SCOTUS always means war as this nation was not born inside
SCOTUS so it’s a war against The People that will turn bloody unless you

73
 have a genius in your midst who is paying close attention and is willing to
act upon what she knows. The US lucked out this time. The first time
should be our last time as twice is no mistake. This was one of our closest
calls as a nation. This is also why you avoid Commanders who have
strong ties to political parties and/or businesses as you can’t have an out
of control dictator replacing the crooks as that is equally lethal. Franklin
said who cares if one guy robs you or a mob robs you? as it’s still robbery
or: you’re still a fallen Republic. It’s why political parties are a bad idea all
around: how could I know I would have to commandeer the US Armed
Forces? Political party membership would have prevented me from doing
it. To be organized but still actually independent? You’re a party of one.

110. Sam Walton himself looked at PACS and said he would not be creating
a PAC as he believed they were bad for his customers. He shied away
from politics as he knew business and politics makes for bad bedfellows.
By customer he meant people who walk in off of the street and his
employees. He drops dead, his kids create a PAC, they move to China,
they support communism, they assault and batter Americans (and inside
federal courts) and then American business packs up and leaves in
general. PACS: Who benefits? Businesses who then fund politicians and
get kickbacks come earmarking time. Not only do you end up aiding and
abetting China thus making war on the US as China wants and needs us
dead but I entered the state rules for the office of Executive as even the
least restrictive state allows you to buy your way onto the ballot by paying
a fee. The rules do not ask you to prove ability and the rules are
unreasonable in that they are all over the place but in every state you can
buy your way onto the ballot. Go back to the source of that money that is
fueling everything: Look at any list of the richest Americans and look at
any list of the wealthiest, highest paid CEOS. Look at all CEOs. How
many women are listed?

111. If you look the four PAC cases Souter complained about are all the
same all you need to read are the captions. What’s missing? WOMEN.
You need to be able to prove PACS cause harm by tracing the effects as
some effects then become causes as Federalists Ten states. You need to
prove PACS overthrow the Constitution as private interests use them to do
it. As this is such a large case and it’s all related I decided the easiest way
to tackle it was to separate the entities thus starting with myself and

74
working my way up. As for party/campaign funding in general? Recent
reform is a bust. The money factor causes people to join political parties
as they can’t overcome the money w/o the party...or can they? We can
just toss out the money and the parties completely thus prevent the
purchasing of offices as we already have a system in place to campaign
for a place on the ballot if you are a private, independent natural born
citizen: I, Susan, prove for only $1.27 you can secure the Office and/or a
place on the actual ballot in all 50 states by making a case for The People
in federal court. My bank statement listing $1.27 in my account in April
2007 is entered. Ideally The People need to heal themselves – that’s most
important - thus any person so motivated can choose one of the federal
questions afoot and argue it thus vesting his or her right and interest. You
can address a violation of the Constitution to vest it like Baltimore charging
for videos but not any other media: When is James Bond free versus
when is James Bond not free? Does form matter? Isn’t “The Spy Who
Loved Me” always the same spy who loved me whether it’s a book, a film,
a book on tape or a record by Carly Simon? If I sent Sean Connery into
the library with Woody Allen’s library card and Daniel Craig’s driver’s
license would he be made to pay and/or qualify himself in order to see
Pierce Brosnan as James Bond? Himself as James Bond? Is this an
unjust tax that targets the poor and the deaf? You can remedy an injury.
It’s your choice. That constitutes you proving you can fulfill the oath if we
elect you and guess what? As The People fund the federal court it’s bang
for our buck. You won’t have many people who succeed; that is you won’t
have so very many that the ballot is overrun and you address the citizens
having their right to enter the courts violated at the same time. If you use a
jury then the jury gets to award you that place on the ballot or not as a
second, separate question a part from the point of law as your argument
might win the day but might not be Executive in nature. It’s a system The
People can use now until we have a new system and until this mess is
sorted out and it’s wholly constitutional as that person is vetting him or her
self then by subjecting themselves to the review of The People thus it is
voluntary as outside vetting is not legal. ONLY qualified, natural born
citizens can do this. It’s like I told Obama: to prove his innocence and
natural birth status? Obama had to enter his answer before I entered my
brief and he did not so first one to the bar wins as obviously she’s natural
born as her actions produced unique, original, intellectual property that
benefits the US and she even gave up the profits as she copyrighted it in

75
 the name of The People not herself. It’s the quickest way to heal the injury
and the quickest way to cause the People to feel actual liberty once again.
It’s not about the appearance of your documents but what you, the person,
bring to court as you then have to support the paper to the level of proof
by yourself. You have to be able to produce in person; you have to be able
to argue it yourself no matter what it looks like on paper as even if you
enter the most professional documents we’re ever seen, a Founder might
have written them as they look so good, but you can’t string two words
together in person? We possess reasonable doubt. This then would
inspire people to obey, enforce and uphold the Constitution as they would
know as fact the door would be open for them if they wanted or needed to
walk through it; it would be possible and you never know what will happen
in life: I, Susan, am a past President. I actually vested the right and the
interest in 7th grade as class President. It counts, as it is as valid as any
national election as The People duly elected me, I served two terms and
retired as I graduated. SCOTUS was I then legally vesting it. The People
do not participate when they feel as if it and they do not count. The People
need a reason to invoke the law from the time when they are children so
they come to embody it and then to continue to enforce it, avoiding all
negative contracts. As The People have been working on reform plans this
would give us time to evaluate and implement one of those plans and if we
chose one that did not work? We’d have a fail safe back up system to rely
upon the control of which rests wholly with The People.

112. The following is the recently dismissed case mistakenly filed as a

prisoner’s motion as it contains the details of a hate crime perpetrated by
a political party as if you read it again you’ll see I wrote that I felt hate. And
I don’t know what Resolution 511 is if it isn’t hate as it stomps all over the
Constitution and makes the Federal Judiciary useless as it has been
replaced with the House Judiciary Committee. Congress, ruled by the two
party monopoly, uses the House committee to prevent citizens from suing
in federal court. I witnessed the rise of a military dictatorship in the US. All
of the above is involved and caused it; it’s matter of sorting out causes
and effects. One effect? HATE. I have felt hate twice in my life so I know
it:

113. The wrongly dismissed part of the complaint: On 11/09/09 I, Susan,

became the very first citizen ever to receive a default judgment from

76
 SCOTUS. This happened as I have always known Bush V Gore referred
to here as BVG was and is a tie that served to uncheck all offices and strip
all natural born citizens of their vote thus all of their rights. It’s 5 as 1
versus 4 as 1, 1 v 1, as nothing else is legal nor is it good math. It
especially harms women and enlisted service members and harmed me
directly and grossly, until I suffered physical death but survived. Although
this should be impossible this is what happens when SCOTUS rules
wrongly and so installs a President thus makes law upon a case that has
zero basis in our Constitution living or written and when it then awards the
Office of the Executive to lawyers not on the ballot giving legal standing to
pieces of paper not people so that SCOTUS has committed what
constitutes a coup and has overthrown the Constitution but then refuses to
admit to what it did only as I, Susan, the person who made the case
happens to be a woman who is not a lawyer. See attachments C and 5,
Herbert V Obama also in this court.

114. There was a fire in my home so this is a few days late. It may take me
a few more days to send in one or two other parts of this case as the fire
ended up destroying some documents. The facts regarding the
Libertarian, Democratic and Republican Parties begin at number 7.

115. This complaint is brought under USC 1983 and USC Chapter 18 but
firstly under the Declaration and Constitution as acts of Congress, acts of
SCOTUS with the other Judiciary and acts of the sitting Executive past
and current conflict with the Constitution as does law the citizens made via
a direct vote of The People as nothing within the Constitution, US case
law or US code allows for the citizens to make law via a direct vote, to
violate the natural birth, equal protection and due process clauses via a
direct vote or to target women, enlisted serviced members or me and my
sons exactly via a direct vote. And nothing provides for the violation of fully
vested fundamental rights which go w/o redress and w/o any actual
remedy and relief as nothing grants any citizen not even Presidents and
Justices blanket immunity. See US V Nixon. I also have standing to sue to
enforce a judgment of default entered by SCOTUS and am in the correct
court as the very first violation of a fundamental right was perpetrated by
the federal government while I and my children were Navy dependents
and this violation is directly linked to a former Executive and
unconstitutional policy he invoked as well as a crime he committed which

77
 Congress then excused, as if it never happened. As it’s core this judgment
of default occurred because every single sitting officer I came in contact
with and every single citizen reasoned and decided they or other officers
and/or lawyers were above the law while I and my sons were below it or
less than human and as they insisted that US law provided for no remedy
and relief. It is directly due to women never having been accorded actual
equal protection and due process and as women have never been able to
bring the case for equality before SCOTUS as it is either argued
incorrectly, it is not heard w/o any reason or cause named, men not
women bring it, no pro se litigants are allowed before SCOTUS and
unconstitutionally so, and/or the person bringing it is unconstitutionally
denied redress for the violation of her rights perpetrated by SCOTUS
employees.

116. Jurisdiction: 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 – 1412: I have read it and this venue
then would be proper as prior court activity occurred in this district and as
this may be the only venue left via process of elimination. Plus as this is
an authority case ANY federal venue would be appropriate as one of the
concerned parties, female voters, lives here.

117. What began as a family case over custody escalated until I was
challenging men inside SCOTUS and even SCOTUS itself as ultimately
they and it caused the injury. The case spanned several states and was
and is in court in three: NY, PA and FL. as the creation of impossible
standards then created legal limbo; either no action is taken thus the case
sits and sits or the states harm me with impunity.

118. The SCOTUS docket proves my claims – it along with me constitutes

incontrovertible proof - but in this unique case I must now sue those
involved in order to address an intrinsic flaw in the process which now
denies us our rights in order to force sitting officers, whole institutions and
the voters to recognize the law and my person and so the equality of
women, the legal and biological reality they deny, or, to enforce the
judgment of default.

119. Both major parties are guilty. I‘ll deal with the Republicans first: In the
fall of 2004 I went to a political rally sponsored by the Republicans at
which George Bush Jr. was to appear. Ultimately I received the shock of

78
 my life, as I am a witness to genocide born in the US. For years
sociologists have been looking for this answer as have I. Scientists could
name the elements and which conditions did not seem to matter; they
could not name the cycle or the pattern or if they had every element or
how they came together. I can answer this question due to the Republican
Party.

120. Several elements do need to exist plus they do come together in a very
specific way and scientists are wrong: I now know what comes before the
eruption of mass violence so that I can state as fact what happened in
Rwanda may have been longer in coming then anyone ever imagined.
The best way I know how to say it to a federal judge: An event such BVG
or 9/11 occurs; there seems to be an escalation of fear plus injustice. BVG
is very, very important – what it is and does to cause genocide is intrinsic
– but 9/11 is not very consequential because all it needs to be is anything
the leaders can use as an excuse to act unjustly or create more irrational
fear, what I named suspicious fear: be suspicious; be worried; your
neighbor may be your enemy; you can’t see your enemy. It’s a rev up.
Then all necessary elements are realized in one time and one place and
so genocide ripens. I saw the event that no one ever saw before; when
and how it ripens so that mass violence may erupt. At this point it’s
possible as the ‘machine’ is in place and the people did it once so it is then
alive and what I witnessed and what I know tell me that IS how Nazi
Germany was born and nobody realized it but not what Rwanda saw as
Rwanda had no central cult personality surrounded by ‘officers’ who
actually did all the dirty work. However I can answer the questions about
Rwanda, as now I know what no other person ever knew.

121. This sounds awful; it is. Bush Jr. is not guilty; he had no idea what
happened before he arrived and I saw him flinch when a person held up a
sign reading Jews for Bush. Why? The hate speech, that’s why. I saw
Jews cheering for their own extinction, women cheering for their own
extinction and enlisted service members cheering for their own extinction.
The news is not all bad: As I was there the US can now own up to it and
then take credit for giving the world an answer that can stop genocide
forever. The whole event is on tape and I have a witness: A Vietnam
Veteran as it seemed that only he and I and perhaps a few other Veterans

79
 knew something had gone horribly wrong. I, Susan, knew the exact word
- genocide - and so I became terrified and fled for my life.

122. We know BVG and everything that happened up to fall 2004 – a time
before we knew it is a bad declaration of war. The Republicans said you
had to arrive 5 hours before the event or you couldn’t get in. 5 hours in the
baking sun in FL in a football stadium; it was an oven. To get in you had to
pass through ‘security guards’ – members of the Republican Party or at
least the guy who touched me was. They began roughing people up. They
began confiscating silly things only to throw them out as if you had to
leave it they were dumping it not leaving it for you to claim. So a mood
developed.

123. Now we’re in the stadium. As it heats up the concession stands are
charging outrageous prices for drinks and food. You have five hours of
this. Then the toilets overflow all over the stadium. It is getting worse and
worse and worse. I can feel the mood shifting and I begin to realize what I
might be witnessing but I keep telling myself it’s impossible. I’m thinking
this can’t be but I know genocide so the only word I have is ripen, maybe
this is how it ripens so then the possibility of mass violence exists at any
time; maybe it’s not possible until it ripens. I now know that’s it, it must
ripen. Something is made physically real. Exacting thoughts, feelings,
ideas and beliefs along with motivation and intent combined with issues
regarding power, victimization, justification not justice and morals not
ethics is made real. The otherwise ‘good’ civilians doing it? They are the
targeted victims and do not even know it; they are unaware they have
been actively ‘recruited’ to participate and so do not know they have been
deliberately targeted. This is important, as coming into play in order to
keep the recruited participants unaware is a cycle of blame, shame, anger
and guilt.

124. A Vietnam Veteran sits down. Everybody is talking and he begins

talking about John Kerry; he’s not here to ask you to vote for Bush as he’s
here to tell us: WHATEVER YOU DO YOU CAN NOT VOTE FOR
KERRY; EVEN DON’T VOTE AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT CAST YOUR
VOTE FOR KERRY. He has no idea who he’s voting for due to the
candidates – none of them are fit; none of them are safe. You’re either

80
 safe or not; safety is or not. There’s no such thing as a little safety or a
little liberty. So people start asking him questions.

125. I listen to him talking and I stop him: I have a question: “I know about
the Swift boats; I hear Swift boat everything. Now you just said something
– unfit for command. I don’t need to know about Swift Boats. Why did you,
a person not here to vote for Bush and a veteran just say unfit for
command like you did? What’s YOUR reasoning?” So he said, “He lied
about the return of his medals.” I reply, “Okay now I know: Violation of a
renegotiated honor bound contract. He’s unfit to command.” This happens
to be one of the most grievous offenses you can commit. You give up your
medals as it is your claims THE PEOPLE have violated the Declaration
and Constitution wholly and absolutely in your case. You are no longer a
party to the contract. If things change and the contract is renegotiated the
President representing THE PEOPLE reawards your medals. At that
point? You had better not look sideways if looking sideways is a violation.
A lie? A violation. Cheating? A violation. Running for any office when not
fit to serve? A violation. This nation needs to get right with itself: all the
proof I ever wanted or needed was that Veteran saying he came here on
his day off not to vote for Bush but to stop me from voting for Kerry. If he
said or did nothing else that is the proof. I believe Vietnam Veterans: I do
not believe one of them: John Kerry. How many veterans have to tell me if
you elect that man you might be killed? 1. Not 2, not 20, not 75 but 1.

126. So all day long things worsen, it’s more heaped on top of what feels as
if it is unbearable, it’s like a sewer, until the hate speech begins. Like
nothing I have ever heard in my life. The speakers begin and it is insanity
from the get go; it has been building up all day as there were acts like
musicians every once in a while so a person would grab a mike and blurt
something out or they would broadcast something to ‘entertain’ us while
we waited. It is a mixture of politicians and party leaders plus well known
locals. An ex-Model named Kim Alexis gives a speech. [Kim Alexis is a
person, a good person, who then participated. Why? I know why. This is
my reasoning for naming her - not as she’s guilty but as she has some of
the most priceless living testimony ever as she was there and she did it
but she did not know.] From among the speakers she stood out as she’s a
woman and a mother and her words made my blood run cold. Certain
words and slogans are repeated ad infinitum. Bloody, bloody, baby,

81
 women, Christian, bloody, murder, and on and on. Men get up. Jesus,
bloody, baby, women, murder, drugs. THIS IS A CHRISTIAN NATION.
Over and over and over. You think it’ll stop or somebody will react but they
do not. Now it’s bloody, baby, women, WAR, JESUS, WAR, bloody,
Christian, abortion, bloody. I’m getting more and more concerned. I’m
watching it all, taking it all in as now I know: I am about to see how
genocide is born; I’m gonna know – how did the Nazis do it, why good
people did it and why the Jews didn’t act. I want the court to note: I always
knew I’d have to give this answer to the Jews then the rest if the world.
Once I knew I was actually seeing it? I captured it all in my minds eye
paying special attention to: the emotions. Those I captured in my body;
you can sort of internalize them to recall them later. It’s a gift, as I have an
instrument that is perfectly calibrated – my ears – as I listen different, with
my entire person; I record or memorize things differently than other people
do. It’s related to how I process language so that I experience the actual
whole truth while others experience only a part of it or miss it completely. I
was experiencing the truth of the whole event in that stadium; others
missed it entirely while that Veteran knew most of it. That’s because: If
your person matches US law in letter and sprit, if you have those same
beliefs and practice them, your emotional compass is very finely tuned.
Mine happens to be perfectly calibrated the way a perfumer has a
perfectly calibrated nose or a taste tester has a perfectly calibrated
tongue. It’s what makes me such a deadly constitutional attorney: If an
argument or ruling – or a belief - does not match the Constitution? I’ll know
it and I’ll know exactly what it is and why. It will light up like a Christmas
tree for me. Then I can read what the Justices wrote and know: This is
what the lawyer needs or this is what they all missed or this is where the
Justices erred. Sometimes I will read one or two sentences and know;
other times the caption alone will tell me. Often I can even identify what
mistaken belief specific people involved in the case have as it’s all over
the paper but they do not realize it, as they aren’t doing what I’m doing. As
people produce paper? I can listen to a piece of paper the same way I can
listen to a person.

127. The stadium feels like it is filling up with water, as if we’ll drown, and
the crowd is cheering insanely and then suddenly on the jumbotron is a
JEWS FOR BUSH sign. The crowd cheers; Bush flinches – he knows
something is wrong as it is the way they cheered – only he says

82
something like “We’re a Christian nation but there’s room for Jews too.”
And there it was; it ripened: This crowd let up a roar EXACTLY like the
People hearing Hitler let out. It’s distinctive; I will never forget the sound
and feeling of it. The extreme physical discomfort; the extreme heat and
smell of the overflowing bathrooms; the anger; the nonstop hate speech;
the imagery, very detailed ideas of graphic violence regarding women and
babies but labeled Christianity, mixed with the emotions that were swirling
around as if waves washing over the participants and the sound of that
roar rising like an expectant release of joy, eagerness, but joy for violence
and death; a religious fervor for a political agenda whether it is
constitutional or not and no matter who it harms, so urgent even your own
person is expendable for the good of the cause. The sound that the crowd
made in that one incredible roar was deeper and more intense than any
cheering I have ever heard but the intensity of the emotion is what
frightened me the most, as if these people were made to be temporarily
insane, actually insane, as they were feeling joy but expressing the idea of
blood and death for no named reason, so that expressing this insane idea
purposely – This is a Christian nation - to then feel that emotion became
their cause and became their reason. If they expressed that idea – those
words in that order no matter how senseless they are in the context of
America - they were rewarded with that emotion – joy - so death and the
idea of killing women and babies made them feel good as it cannot be
murder if Christians do it. The emotion itself became their god; the
emotion itself became their cause and they would say or do anything to
get it. I do not like to use the word joy, perhaps joy infused with pride,
you’re proud to be killing women in the name of Jesus, as to feel this you
need to have other people around you who engage in a sort of give and
take. It’s as if you need that outside approval to then feel the emotion, that
to get that approval is to then be able to feel it. I witnessed what happens
when individuals have had their sense of self annihilated to such an extent
and degree that they then ‘adopt’ a collective created sense of self, a
sense of self that is located completely outside each person so that if the
group promotes it you then identify with it – you are it or so you truly
believe – thus you feel good when you express it, even it is insensible like
equating Christianity with death instead of life. You have traded your will
for the will of the crowd; you have replaced I with us, not we. The people
in that crowd could not tell you what they were cheering for if you asked
them; all they could do is say exact words but not delineate any actual

83
 concept or any actual belief. Human emotion without any reason;
unconditional pride. The Nazis had unconditional pride; it was their sense
of self; it was directly wired to their id but that id only exists as a group. It
doesn’t exist if the group doesn’t exist. Each individual had wholly
conditional love, indifference, directly wired to his or her ego. It’s human
emotion without reason as a group and human reason without emotion as
an individual. It’s how and why each individual could be so brutal – they
felt so good doing it. It’s how and why they were such effective killing
machines, as they could operate either in a group or alone. Compare it to
what you know: How hard does a group have to work to get even one
person to do what he or she would never do, such as convince a person
to commit rape only as the others in the group pressure him? How hard
does a group have to work to convince one person to do something
‘smaller’ like rob? It used to be impossible in America; now it is common
and nobody blinks. Kill reason first by battering them with words, render
them powerless – they must feel powerless both mentally and physically –
and then insert a new idea over a long period of time but do it in such a
way you make them truly believe it as real, ‘it’s America’, as you cement it
inside them with that one, massive, final blow: visual imagery, auditory
imagery – all of your senses being attacked - and with a wallop of
emotion that feels unbelievably fantastic. But I felt terrified. I know now
that a person could have held up a sign that read Kill The Jews and I
would have heard that same roar as long as the person ‘leading’ the
crowd condoned it and so did the guy sitting next to you. Hitler’s big lie
only it is bigger and much more insidious than anyone ever suspected.

128. At that exact moment it felt as if the water had risen over my head and
I was going to drown; I was actually going to die. I was going to suffocate.
Nobody was stopping it; I knew exactly what had to happen for mass
violence to erupt. I knew I could do something exactly and we’d have
mass violence. And somebody might do that accidentally. I took one look
at that Veterans face and fled for my life. He was silent and he had a look
of confusion and revulsion on his face; his silence was different as it was
as if he couldn’t move. He KNEW something had gone horribly wrong but
he did not have the word “genocide” in his head or he would have had a
different look on his face. The person I attended this event with? That
person was cheering; he had no idea what had happened and when I fled
he kept trying to tell me that I was ‘crazy’ and making it up; he was

84
 absolutely clueless as to what he had just been deceived into doing. He
absolutely, positively did not hear the lie he was just told, the lie of his life,
the most lethal and deadliest lie of all: They will think for me; I don’t have
to think; I don’t have to feel.

129. I then went back over the record of genocide that we have. Nazi
Germany and Rwanda are the same; it’s the same but it is realized a
slightly different way. It has to do with power and control; a created fear;
there’s a rev up or a cycle; there’s an event, a moment in time where it
ripens; and if one thing happens after that point? Mass violence will erupt
unless the chain set in motion is broken. Genocide is already, before mass
violence erupts. You might slaughter people in one day or you do it a few
at a time in an illegal war or at home killing women; it might take you five
years to kill them all but it’s mass violence and is genocide. In person I
can go over this in fine detail and reason it all for you. I have to do this for
all citizens but especially for all political parties so they never go here
again. I also have to break or sever the chain set in motion with BVG as
once it ripened? That chain was never broken; it is still in motion today
and is being realized various ways like the John Woo memos discussing if
they could invoke martial law to then use the military to lock up Americans
w/o cause, w/o any hearing or trial and w/o any charges. Yes, in
concentration like camps. Those memos are more serious than anyone
knows. What has not yet happened is the sudden explosion of violence,
which is not so sudden but only appears to be. If the American people
want to know who the Hitler in their midst is I will tell them and trust me, if I
could not prove this beyond any doubts – not reasonable doubt but any
doubt – I would not say it: Dick Cheney. Cheney should be very afraid of
me, as there’s a whole lot of things that he did that he truly believes he
has gotten away with; things he is certain no one will ever know or couldn’t
know, things I can prove. I’m not ‘figuring out’ who did what as I know as
fact without any question whatsoever as following a chain of people is
easy for me. Cheney might believe he did something behind closed doors
so you can’t know but you can; if you have my unique skill you can follow
that chain anywhere and know anything.

130. I do not want say much more about this event on paper. It’s too
important. You have all of the fact you need as I’m not to be forced to
prove my case within my complaint.

85
131. The Republican Party has a federal ruling against it involving voting in
which they were not do certain things again and guess what? They never
stopped doing them and no matter how many people pointed this out
nobody did a thing to enforce that federal ruling. Not in 2004 or in 2008.
The Party has no plan to ever obey that ruling or so I was told.

132. The Republican Party is hoping to nominate Arnold Swarzeneggar to

its ticket in 2012 and/or 2016. They have been promoting this idea all
over. You know, first you agree to seat a foreigner who doesn’t sound like
one and then you can seat one that does sound like one and when we
complain? They will cry: If Obama sat why can’t Arnold sit? It’s a violation
of EP&DP to discriminate against people from Austria but not those
subject to the British Crown. Arnold Swarzeneggar will not sit in that office
before I do, and then he’ll never sit in that office ever, and Obama should
not have.

133. The Republican Party is now placing unqualified people on its ticket;
they know these people are unqualified thus what they are doing is
treason as they are overthrowing the office of the executive, but they do it
regardless. And at the expense of women, blacks and American Indians.
WAR VETERAN is not a reason to commit a crime; nor is it a reason to
violate our rights. I have a few choice words for John McCain as I too am
a war veteran and I too was a prisoner of war - we can compare scars –
and I too was tortured – I can describe intimately what torture is and does
and what it feels like when you get to that point where you’re gonna break
or you’re gonna survive. I too had to make a choice: Do I cut and run or
remain a prisoner? For at least ten years? It would be ten years at the
least. I remained. McCain said he did it as it wouldn’t be fair to the other
prisoners. I did it as I would not be able to live with myself afterwards and
as nothing would change my children would be injured as adults; I did it as
if I’m the only hope these people have – if I don’t do this it will never be
done and these people and this nation will die – then: I have no other
choice. I have never once used WAR VETERAN as a reason for anything
let alone an excuse. I know: I’m not above the law. I’m like everyone else
as we all have one vote. Susan Versus John McCain? McCain is never
gonna be my equal when it comes to moral authority.

86
134. The Republican Party has manipulated and controlled the system and
hogged the ballot for more than a hundred years. It’s time for it to step
aside. What happens? That’s up to the People who are the Party. I would
like to see some of the Republican and Democratic Party leaders in jail but
it’s not up to me; it’s up to the people who are the party and to The
People, the constitutionally set government. Republicans can volunteer to
jettison the leaders who did this, to begin obeying the law, to not assume
one of the top two slots on all 50 ballots for the next few elections and
work to fix how we even manage campaigns as there’s a problem and a
big one with PACS and I have the case as I am the case, or they can
volunteer to cease to exist.

135. The Democrats: The Democratic Party is a vile animal these days. If
Kerry were not enough they gave us Bill Clinton too. Do they HATE
Americans or what? The Democrats told us: We will elect anybody at all,
even crooks and foreigners, as long as we do not elect someone we
actually victimized. You can appear to be black, you just can’t actually be
black. The Parties have both been engaging in propaganda and
conditioning tactics. I don’t know who’s worse. Like this: A person who is
black tells me Obama is one of us and will help us. One of us? Yeah, you
know – a victim. Victim? Obama’s mother is white; she and her family
were not victims of slavery. Obama’s father is Kenyan. He and his family
were not victims of slavery. Obama claims to have suffered from
discrimination. Nope, as look – he doesn’t even qualify and he made it
into the office. If it were discrimination he suffered from then he wouldn’t
be sitting. But you know how I know he is lying when he says he is a
victim? He looks like the majority population of Hawaii. Most Hawaiians
are not white as Hawaii has an indigenous population. He also grew up in
Indonesia; he looks like the majority population of Indonesia. He doesn’t
really look different thus he was not treated differently as in black versus
white. This man is no victim; he only needs you to believe he is. Listen to
how careful this constitutional lawyer is: you do realize he was careful to
say My wife’s family is related to slaves and were slaves as if by being
married to her he is then a victim too? When I point this out to people they
are stunned. They are not hearing it. And then the things they do hear:
Everyone can name Hawaii. So nobody stops to reason what the
Hawaiians who are Native look like? Yes as they are absoluting everything
to death instead of connecting it. Discrimination causes a physical injury; it

87
 actually affects your brain. It causes your brain to sort of cross wires as it’s
about annihilation of self. You confuse id with ego; you lose the human
ability to feel liberty as an emotion and physical sensation. It truly does
dumb you down. Nobody is hearing the truth due to the injury: Using
words to make it seem as if, a thing lawyers do too well. Democrats took it
to a new level as they used imagery too such as the “Office of the
President Elect”, a make believe office with its own podium, own news
conferences and own great seal. People truly believe it’s a named office.
How severely have the people been injured? I found out: Incapacitation.
Lawyers did it for politicians and then did it for businesses; it escalated
and became the norm and went on for so long the people suffer a form of
brainwashing named in the DSM. I can fix it, as I know how to heal this
injury. But I’ll give you an example of what this injury does to a person:

136. I ask a person: “I believe John Kerry is unfit for command”. Is that a
fact? The person hesitates and finally She: Yes, Kerry is unfit. Me: I know
if Kerry is fit or unfit. I asked you about your belief not Kerry. You think
there is a right or wrong answer, as if one is good or bad. You were
hesitating as you were trying to figure out what answer I wanted you to
say so instead you...answered a question I did not ask. I asked is this your
belief? Is it a fact of you? So, somebody in your world has taught you that
some beliefs are good and some are bad. Nope. They are. Now, did you
even hear what I asked? Say that statement in your head like this: If you
ask me that same thing I’d answer this way: I, Susan, believe Kerry is
unfit. I do. Okay, YES, it is a fact – a fact of me; my fact is I do posses this
belief. But you answered, “Yes, Kerry is unfit.” Can you answer my
question the other way? Can you answer it ‘No, Kerry is not unfit’? You
know what else? If I make that statement to you then ask you if it is a fact?
You can’t answer it at all unless you ask me what my belief is! When this
happens it is about self-awareness and sense of self. “I believe”: You
don’t see quotes when a person speaks!

137. People “can’t believe” what they did. They’re stunned. And guess
what? The Democrats exploited this very injury. How deep does this go?
Deep as now it is everywhere. LAWYERS did it to America. So did
speechwriters. People are hammered all day long with this, even on the
news. Thus a person goes to a poll to vote and although they have been
conditioned to vote for a certain candidate they don’t know it so they truly

88
 believe they made a choice born of will and liberty when no, they are
operating upon that conditioning on a subconscious level and then the
carefully chosen words that serve to deliberately steer their choice so it is
NOT their choice and is NOT voluntary. This is exactly how bad it is and
how deep is it is:

138. A commercial now running says this: “Studies show 1 out of 4 women
can misread a pregnancy test”. CAN? As in ability? 1 out of 4 women have
the human ability to....make a mistake! Who reads a pregnancy test
incorrectly on purpose? Who deliberately reads it incorrectly? Or by
accident? Oops! I accidentally looked at my own pregnancy test! No, it is 1
out of 4 women have the human ability to make a mistake. Now, what
studies? It says “Studies show”. Not even a recent study but a generic
“studies”. You mean millions and billions of our tax dollars went into
finding out if human beings can make mistakes? Is it possible humans
make mistakes? And if possible do humans then act with deliberation to
make mistakes? Well, I gotta tell this court: I know what “studies” these
are; I know every one of them. Since the dawn of man we have tested,
studied and determined mistakes. I can even name the very first scientific
study regarding mistakes ever made: Eve made a mistake and we were
off. Government was born! Ever since then we have thought about
mistakes, considered mistakes and examined mistakes. Man debates and
argues and promotes his mistakes in study after study. Man and mistakes:
Our own Founders studied mistakes. They went all over the world
studying them. They read about them, watched them and collected the
details of them. They then designed the largest, grandest most important
study ever conducted to answer this question: Can man govern himself,
or, is he doomed to always and forever make a mistake from which
he cannot recover? It took over 200 years for this study to be completed.
In November of 2000 the study was finished. I was floored: Why, it seems
the Founders never considered what if the conclusion of the experiment
itself IS the mistake man never recovers from every time? What if nobody
knows the study has been concluded??? Or nobody knows the
mistake??? Time to review our mistakes! Is this the most perfect form of
government on Earth? I am! I could have saved that drug company
billions. As it is they might owe me billions. Notice they aren’t telling us
that 1 out of 4 men make mistakes. It’s only women who have the human
ability to make mistakes as if men can correctly read a pregnancy test

89
 100% of the time and perfectly do everything 100% the time. Well, make
no mistake: Every time I ask someone what that commercial is saying they
tell me that 25% of the time pregnancy tests are wrong as in the test itself
is defective but mostly, almost exclusively, I hear this: women can’t read
them as they are confused. As in can’t understand directions. Not one
person realizes he has just been told women can and do make mistakes 1
out of 4 times – if a pregnancy test is involved. What? Do women make a
mistake 1 out of 4 times when breathing? Opening a can of soda? Hmmm,
in all I do all day long am I, Susan, making a mistake 25 % of the time?
Will the Creator tell me upon death: Susan, 25% of everything you ever
did was a mistake. I’m not kidding: one woman said when she first heard
it she thought dumb as in such a dumb woman would need to go back to
school and men have told me that they do truly believe women are less
than men – a SCOTUS clerk told me this and even said he did not believe
the Constitution applied to women and some of that is because of crap like
this as he does not even know he is absorbing it as fact and truth as it’s so
subtle and feeds into the pre-existing injury - and when I asked men
about this ad some did assume it was something women did like couldn’t
read the test or the instructions; as if it was about how women are: DUMB.
Dumb is a state of being for women; it is a fact of men that women are
dumb. I understand directions perfectly; I follow them perfectly. Watch me
perfectly follow the directions in the Federalist Papers and so sue this
company for LYING to the public thus harming women as it implies and
infers WOMEN ARE CREATED DEFECTIVE thus it is their unchangeable
nature and uses brain washing to do it. It says one of us makes mistakes
while three of us are perfect and that’s a lie, false advertising, as all
women - 100% - CAN misread a pregnancy test so 1 out of 300 million
Americans WILL sue: You did not say 4 out of 4 women can misread a
pregnancy test and I know why: The jig is up if you said that, isn’t it? This
drug company did not make a mistake. It acted with deliberation.

139. Exactly as everything these Parties did is deliberate. Don’t believe me?
Joe Trippi of the Democratic Party, the guy who worked for Dean, wrote a
book; it’s called “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. He told me to use
the internet to steal this seat, to take private funds for the first time since
1976 to steal this seat, and to figure out a way to motivate the 47% of
people who never vote to then vote if I wanted to win just for the sake of
winning as it was about winning. He even told me that I should look for a

90
 minority person, as these voters are mostly low income. This sounds like a
plan. That somebody decided to follow to the letter: I saw a magazine
cover that read (not exact): “How the kid who owns Facebook chose a
President”. It was all about how the internet, namely Facebook, was used
to seat Obama and that w/o Facebook no Obama. I, with my own ears,
heard Obama say he was going to take private money for the first time
since 1976. Then I saw the Democrats desperate and scared. I also saw
the wealthy men who control them gleam as they knew: We finally
managed to gain control of it all; all we gotta do is make it seem as if we
are electing a black person when really we’re electing a foreigner as the
only thing we can’t get past now is a victim...if an actual victim sits our
goose is cooked so we can make it seem as if but we just can’t elect a
person who was one of our victims. We can even nominate a woman who
used to be a man but had a sex change operation as long as it isn’t one of
our actual victims. And a black guy who isn’t would then motivate those
47% of the voters we’ve never been able to motivate...you know they’ll
vote for us thus making it seem as if he’s way more popular than he
actually is. Nobody will ever realize the actual numbers tell a different
story and who will ever check the actual facts? We can do this! Now, did I
or did I not hear that this election brought out more voters than any
election we could remember? None of this is mistake. Now, did the
Democratic Party leader Harry Reid say they might be able to get a light
skinned black who did not sound black then elected? It’s all history that
you deny. See the people who are black decry this but also embrace it as
it proves racism is still alive and well. I attached Jasmyne Cannick.

140. Even if we assume everything Barack Obama ever said or did his
whole entire life is a fact it is also a fact that he signed 511. He unqualified
himself then. But not one Party member noticed? Not any members of the
Democratic Party knew of that document? At least two signed it. No
Republicans knew of it? So what did they do? Did both parties collude? As
it seems as if they had a silent agreement to remain silent when 511 was
passed – approved by the Judiciary Committee – as nobody in either
Party said a word.

141. The two major parties do not abide by their own party philosophy. If
you look around you can’t discern any difference at all between the two
but if you then compare how they act, what they create and how they vote

91
 against their platforms you see they do not follow their own party ‘agenda’.
This too is a way The People are being conditioned. A voter I know was
shocked, he actually did not know, when he realized that these people
have zero in common with their stated beliefs. He could not get over how
very far from these stated beliefs the party members act and that
Americans aren’t up in arms and fighting back. He truly believed his fellow
citizens liked this, wanted this and were condoning and promoting this
until he read those platforms.

142. The Libertarian Party: They have a plank calling or foreignization. Or

they did when last I checked. That’s not free speech – it’s a crime known
as treason as you’re organizing and collecting money to then overthrow
the Executive thus overthrow The People.

143. I’d keep going as I have lists and lists of things each party has done
but it’s not necessary as I’m not here to make a case as it is already made
and won. I’m here to enforce my judgment thus what I need is to be able
to teach the people what they need to know to heal the injury and to
protect themselves from these nasty tactics in the future. I also need these
two parties to admit to everything they did and the Libertarian Party to
remove the foreignization plank if they still have it. As they’re so good at
raising so much money? They can offer me some. And big business had
better not get any ideas as they need me; this is gonna go one way or the
other and so their only question should be “Do we want to survive as a
company?” as if you do then I am your only hope. Without me? You do not
have that hope as I’m the only person alive with the solutions as only I can
hit China up with a bigger fear than they named. Only I can exert power
and authority over the likes of China and then the other nations, as only I
know exactly what to use and how to use it. China wants to call in that
debt the parties created and/or seize US interests? China said it’d nuke
us; China said it would bomb us. Too bad for China as that threat is empty
and I know it so all I have to do is tell planet Earth by giving it the science.
The royal families of Europe told me that they would NEVER give up the
money they make off of the backs of their American serf/slaves without
their consent and against their will. Too bad for royalty everywhere then as
all I have to do is deal with one, Queen Elizabeth: You don’t want to see it
any way but my way as you made a mistake or you made the greatest,
most important decision of your life as you gave your subjects the right to

92
 dissolve you when you agreed to pay income tax. I took the liberty of
informing them in SCOTUS Petition 07-9804, In Re Susan, as Gordon
Brown is not my cup of tea and he refuses to hold a vote; I informed them
that all they have to do is order you to remove Brown via orderign him to
hold a vote so they can and will vote in a person who understands what an
honor bond is; that Brown has no choice but to obey your order as the
Queen defends her subjects – The British People - not any office or title.
Given a choice between Parliament and the Queen? If it means the British
people have actual power and authority thus control over their destiny and
fate and that the monarchy is no longer a meaningless, empty, vacuous,
luxury hog with too much time on their hands and too little to do then I
know as fact without question exactly who the British people will choose:
Queen Elizabeth as she, not Gordon Brown, secured the right of
dissolution for them. The rest of European royalty had better start looking
for jobs or merely agree to see it my way thus act for the people they now
lord over. Nobody, no nation on Earth or even all of Earth acting as one,
has more moral authority than the US so businesses and the lawyers they
hire can try it as can the uberwealthy and so can another nation but they
will lose each and every time as they cannot defeat what Susan owns:
The truth. My greatest concern?

144. I witnessed the Democrats do something I thought I’d never, ever

see. I mean never: Traditionally it has been very difficult to get
American Indians to agree to harm themselves. Traditionally they
fight wars over this very idea, as they do not surrender to what is
unconstitutional. Traditionally their war cry is they'd rather be dead
than be injured by their own hand - I live in the home of the
Seminole, the Unconquered People, as the entire federal
government with the US military couldn't defeat them - and I’m
Native American so I have no idea what Obama offered them that is
so damn attractive other than that false appearance and that is it:
they have no idea they were told a lie and that they are victimizing
their own persons, that what the Europeans couldn’t do to them in
over 400 years and then the entire federal government and US
military couldn't do to them in over 200 of those years the
Democratic Party did in only a few months: They gave up their
traditions, their true beliefs about constitutional authority.

93
145. As long as a natural born American sits American Indians have the hope
that they can ascend to this office someday as currently they do not qualify. If
criminals and foreigners sit? There is no hope for any American Indian. No
foreign power has any interest in the American Indian and criminals by their very
nature have no interest in the ethical. They will, as question without fact, become
extinct. [I love this Freudian slip; I’m keeping it.] It has to do with dual citizenship
and numbers, as we almost did exterminate them and they realize the effects of
discrimination distinctly, like persons who are black but in a distinct manner as
we prevented them from practicing their religion while blacks were able to
practice it. For all the advantages American Indians had over blacks that were
brought here in chains they suffer worse and the attrition rate is higher. It’s not
only a compounding of effects but of never having been able to achieve in any
actual manner that then caused truly effective change. They never had a
Thurgood Marshall and they may be dead before that ever happens if the injury
is not addressed. You harm all children when you harm their mothers and it is
from your mother that you get your will, your ideas of spirituality and right and
wrong. If you harm mothers in such a way they can’t teach their children and
then compound that with outlawing religious expression so the entire group is
existing on sheer will alone you rip a hole in the group so wide and deep it is
nearly impossible to survive, as you can’t replace the people you are losing. You
not only lose the physical bodies but you lose the knowledge, the traditions
regarding how to do things the old way and the sacred traditions. It’s as if an
always fatal disease is ever present among you so you constantly teeter on the
brink. All that kept American Indians from succumbing up to now was
constitutional authority. Constitutional authority allows American Indians to defy
the federal government. That kind of will is inviolate; I know as I have it. Man
cannot survive on will alone but if it’s constitutional authority he can survive long
enough then get to a place whereby he can thrive. If all American Indians had
was that ego based will that is decidedly European in nature they never, ever
would have made it this long. It is the will born of id, the same will our Founders
had, that kept them going through it all. And for the first time ever they are giving
it away; they are being broken and do not know it. I, Susan, know as fact w/o
question that if this is not addressed American Indians will not survive as an
ethnic group and most likely will not survive at all as American Indians have not
been able to access any of our institutions. I do not mean government
institutions only but all institutions across the board. They have never been able
to recover to a point whereby they could begin thriving again. Constitutional
authority is their only natural resource and they can’t lose it before they are

94
accorded justice or they will not make it. So I know, I absolutely know that If
somebody does not stop the Democratic Party and restore constitutional
authority to the American Indians the political parties are going to slaughter the
American Indians once and for all.

146. I, Susan, have a better idea than any of the political parties: The
American Indians told me they needed justice and that meant the land.
Specifically the Ft. Laramie land. I did not ask if they would accept something
else. As no person ever revisited the issue on their behalf I did. I, Susan, can
and may return that land but my plan involves American Indians becoming full
citizens by choice, upon their own will and liberty without any force or coercion.
They can accept or reject my plan with zero consequences imposed on them by
the US. The use of the land patent gives American Indians the land back while
preserving it for all Americans and still allows them to live as a group,
collectively. I can and will legally argue a land patent that is royal in charter – the
rarest of all - plus something else: I can and will argue one that is divine in
charter. The treaty I entered covers a part of FL, Spanish granted by royal
charter. Who gave the Spanish king the right to seize land in the new world?
This royal charter is derived from one granted by the Pope. As I’m catholic I then
pursued this papal claim all the way back to Jesus and then even earlier, to
Abraham and before. I can legally document it to the earliest Christian church
due to the Vatican records; I can then use sacred works that all match to legally
prove it then goes back to Adam and Eve. That’s legal. The law has evolved
from what began as divine not secular law; our legal roots are to be found within
salvation history, the history of the metaphysical or of who and what you are as
a people. Later they became secular codes most notably when Mohammed
introduced Islam and most recently when we introduced the Declaration naming
rights granted by God, rights that are inalienable as they came into being with
this universe. Scientifically I can reason it all the way back to the void as I
resolved Uniformity. I know the design of the universe and how it all works. I
know the smallest particle. I can prove everything I claim. I’m not presenting
anything like “We will find the Higgs particle when we turn the collider on; it
should exist”. No it doesn’t. It is not that as I already found it. I can reason this
fully so that anybody can understand it. I can even bring a simple experiment to
court so that the court can then see for itself. This answer was much simpler
than anyone imagined. The problem arguing science in a court of law? There
isn’t a problem if you know there is a legal burden of proof standard that is not
the same as the scientific burden of proof standard. Lawyers do not know what

95
to ask for and scientists would never use what a lawyer does so they have been
entering the incorrect proof. Science has it but lawyers never asked; when a
lawyer asks a scientist for proof? A scientist is thinking controls, laboratories and
numbers. A court of law does accept that at times such as a court will accept
DNA. DNA may prove paternity while it would not prove evolution. Blood may be
entered as proof of a person having worn a shirt when he was shot and killed, a
bloody shirt, but it’s not proof until or unless the person who shot him says “He
was wearing that exact shirt when I shot him.” But blood alone would never
prove murder. I know what a court needs; I know what court of law needs, a
court of science needs and even the Vatican court needs. It’s not the same. As I
can do this American Indians would have a land patent both royal and divine, a
land patent so inviolate all that can break it is the extinction of American Indians,
as I can argue it back to the beginning of the universe but in doing so then also
prove the Creator is reality and did create the universe and then the multiverse. I
can and will prove mankind truly did receive sovereignty over Earth from that
Creator and this then would give everyone what they needed and also give
American Indians security as land patents have never been ruled against by
SCOTUS - they do not break less strict ones; it has never happened and only
the College of William and Mary has a royal one or so I was told – plus it then
makes American Indians a part of the electorate as our Founders named land
owners as the electorate and we are not ready to jettison that yet or so it seems.
American Indians would not only vote but elect the President thus making up for
the disparity they suffer. This is not only possible it is easily doable; it can
happen any time this nation wants to make it happen. It was not and is not
impossible; all any person had to be was motivated so they wouldn’t quit; all any
person had to do was vow to succeed or die trying and be willing to look at the
problem any and all ways whether they personally liked it or not. All any person
had to do was accept it as fact: It’s the land or nothing and these people have no
reason to trust you so you can’t settle for what everybody else has; you can’t
offer them a solution that can then be violated by persons with everything
already. To that end I borrowed my idea from the Sioux: If a white man in 2009
gets a land patent, a regular old land patent, or has no land patent but owns
property, then secure for the ‘least’ privileged group the strictest, securest land
patent of all. The white man then has a vested interest in the Indian as that
Indian is going to vote for the President and that Indian will be here forever and
ever as land patents do not expire when you die but pass on to your heirs in
perpetuity. The Indian has a vested interest in the white man as his land is not
so secure and the Indian can never afford to have this government fall no matter

96
what or else he will lose his inviolate patent to criminals and foreigners. Both
then not only have the same interests but power and authority is leveraged in
such a way each needs the other. [This is about allodial title, actual allodial title.
It’s possible but Indians should know: It’s very, very strict so perfect if you meant
it when you said you needed the land returned as it is sacred but horrible if you
meant to build a resort: If you make any improvements it is no longer allodial. I
have considered the changes since the Ft. Laramie Treaty was broken such as
newer homes and even whole towns. Trust me: There’s a solution.]

147. Do not worry: I have answers for black citizens – any and all
minorities - and for women and lots of them. You drove me too as I was never so
livid as when I heard the political parties say they couldn’t find one able,
capable, qualified black person who is a victim of slavery – the effects of which
are still ongoing – in all of the United States. Not one. You’re all as unable and
as stupid as women are. They had zero qualified candidates as they looked and
looked and couldn’t find a single one. So desperate to find qualified blacks and
qualified women were they that they passed resolutions and made phony law to
help us: they empowered and qualified war veterans born overseas and half-
Americans. I said, “No – what you can’t have is one of two things: A person you
harmed who means to get revenge or a person you harmed who means to end
injustice once and for all, as that then is no more unjust privilege for you.” They
are afraid; they are cowards. What they need to be is ashamed and remorseful
but I’m not waiting around for that to happen. I made sure I did not enter until I
could argue for everyone even if surprised at the last second. I had to be able to
do it cold, with no notes, no books, no help – nothing but my own person. That
took a while. It only became possible in 2006. I made certain I could bring
everyone with me when I entered the bar so when we begin again in 2012 with
the vote we all begin together, not all with the same wealth and same amount of
material goods but with the same opportunity. If I can achieve with nothing but
my brain then you can too, you have no excuse, but most of you have some
resources and you have something I did not: Me today with all of the answers as
when I began this I had only me without any of the answers. And you have
brand new proof: Barack Obama proved that people who are white will vote for a
person who is black. A large number of persons who are white voted for Obama.
No person has to worry that I wasn’t considering you as I considered all of you,
even white men: I’m a hardliner: Equal protection and due process is an inviolate
law of this universe. It’s how you perfect the practice of unconditional love
otherwise known as the Declaration and the Constitution.

97
148. Gay Americans: You are being used by politicians and go along with it.
You have named your price: A piece of paper. A marriage license therefore like
women you are used: One politician gives it to you another takes it away. As
long as you name that piece of paper as the price and your proof? You’re
political as I believe your testimony: If you say you’re gay from birth then you
are. But guess what? That then is a term. So, whatever made you come to
believe you would have kids or serve in the military? You won’t. It’s not because
you’re unequal but because you are equal –you get one vote. So go vote on it:
Do two men or two women ever produce human babies? You can vote yes but it
won’t happen. A marriage license? You do not need one as marriage licenses
are only for protecting any possible children and for protecting women as a
woman risks her life every time she has sex with a man as she might get a
disease or die from complications of pregnancy plus women never had any legal
power. You do not need a marriage license as just because science says you
can does not mean you should: We all made a mistake. You want class status?
You got it: you’re a class. It’s of no help as what you really want is to do anything
at all without any consequences. If you’re gay and from birth then no kids is a
term and until you live that out, live out what you say you truly believe, then we
have no proof of life and you’re not my equal as you’re asking me to make
exceptions for you. I have answers for you and there is way you can serve your
nation but to actually be able to invoke moral authority? You must live out the
terms thus not negotiate your safety: No kids, no military and no marriage
license. It’s already built into the Constitution and you aren’t gonna find any gay
gene as sex acts are always a choice and even with rape the man chose to rape
the woman. Sex is not sexuality. Until you live out what you say you are and
what you say you believe, nobody has proof and they will always and forever be
able to manipulate and control you. Now, if you KNOW AS FACT from birth that
you are gay? What’s all this waffling over children? No person has any business
buying and selling people not only people who are gay. I can fully reason this for
you. I myself have first hand experience as a person in my life is gay and as I,
my own self, do not have a valid marriage license as I never needed one – NY
did so I went out and got a fake one. The relationship is real, the paper is not.
It’s signed, it’s sealed and it is on file but guess what? I gave false information as
I refused to reduce myself to a piece of paper only as NY State, a criminal state,
wanted me to as if a paper made me human. If another state asked me for an
actual valid reason I might get a real one but not if NY asks me. No paper is ever
gonna prove your equal and it will never convince another person you are. I will

98
make my case to you as when you hear all of my reasoning and I answer your
questions you’ll get it. And if you do reason and decide to live it out thus secure
proof of life? Any time a person tries to injure you all you have to do is pull rank
and say: Nope, as I’m willing to volunteer and am. I do not need anything you
have as I already have the only pieces of paper I’m ever gonna need.” That’s
moral authority, the righteous thing for the righteous reason, a just cause, as it
has zero to do with mores or personal beliefs. So – poof! You’re a protected
class. No gay rights as there are no women’s rights but only human rights. Sorry
PETA: We protect humans. Humans possess emotional reasoning capacity
which is why this will be emotional: As you do not own the emotional truth of
“gay”. You only own a part of it. You need the whole truth or you are negotiating
your safety, as you can’t defend yourself without every fact, the whole truth.
Therefore like men and women are both human but biology makes them distinct
so does your class status – you’re distinct as the possibility of children by natural
means is not possible. Are we going to argue if natural birth means naturally
conceived? Yes and no as all third party contracts are invalid and
unconstitutional as a contract exists between two parties. Plus: once you lose
control of the biological material? You lose control of the child so you can never,
ever guarantee its safety and no sperm injecting doctor is ever going to protect
that baby and he or she might even give that baby to monsters just for the
money these days. Nobody should be selling eggs and sperm and no woman
should be paid to risk her life having a child for someone else just as we do not
allow one man to take another’s place in war. You can’t even volunteer to take
another man’s place in war. If you can’t take a man’s place then you can’t take a
woman’s place when it comes to possibly losing your life, at least not in birth or
war. There’s also a scientific reason; I have all of the actual reasons – not lies,
not excuses, not what I personally like and not what is popular. Now deal with it
and discover your actual humanity and all of your actual reasons as that’s what
the protection of the Declaration and Constitution will give you: The truth of you
not me. You’ll also know the truth of whether or not politicians or even entire
political parties ever meant a single they ever said to you as you seem to be as
gullible as women as no matter how many times they do it to you – you keep
falling for it. Political parties do it, private business does it and individuals do it
and you come to believe it with zero evidence and zero proof and when all the
evidence and proof we do have goes against it. Are you ready? IT IS PARTLY
AN EMOTIONAL PROBLEM. You deny this. You think people want to cure you.
Well, some do as if they cure gay they then cure you. I’m not so silly: Gay isn’t a
disease. It MIGHT be a quality of being human. It MIGHT be your choice. I

99
already know the answer; you don’t and The People don’t as none of you have
made the case either way. The federal bench doesn’t know as not one ruling
named it correctly. Everybody but me needs to know or we will be engaged in
what is ideological warfare forever, over gay and over woman. I have no political
agenda and no private interests like money to be made. I could care less who or
what you have sex with as long as it isn’t children or against another’s will, as all
I’m out to cure is the actual disease you have: you’re failure to thrive thus
liberate yourself when nothing was ever actually in your way and when some of
you had every advantage in this world.

149. From “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”:

631 rich white men forced Bush on us. “No Democrat running for president had
ever opted out of Public campaign financing. The way our labyrinthine campaign
finance laws have worked since 1976 a candidate can get matching funds if he
raises a certain amount of money but then he is restricted from spending more
than that amount in any given state. So while matching funds can double a
poorly funded candidate's base, taking the matching money means the
candidate can't go over the cap. But Republicans have proven so adept at
raising those $1,000 and $2,000 checks from the wealthiest Americans (who
benefit most from high-end tax cuts and pro-business policies) they can raise
two, three, four times the cap, while Democrats (relying on much smaller
donations from its middle-class, working constituency) haven't been able to
afford to forego the matching funds...

In the 2000 election, Al Gore raised more money than any Democrat in history,
$49 million. But George W . Bush raised $125 million. Al Gore was the vice
president of the United States, a brilliant, respected career public servant. And
yet somehow a weak governor with five years of political experience and the
oratorical ability of a six-year-old was able to raise two-and-a-half times as much
money? How was that possible?

In 2000, almost half of Bush's money came from 59,279 donations of $1,000
(the maximum limit for donations in 2000), more than three times as many big
donations as any candidate had ever received. As Charles Lewis, executive
director for the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity wrote, "A contribution
check of $ 1000 isn't something the average American can write; most
often, those who open their checkbooks are lawyers, lobbyists, or the
vested economic interests they represent who want something in return

100
from the government." In effect, sixty thousand rich white guys
determined who would be president for the rest of us three hundred
million people. And this is not an aberration. Each year, the richest one
quarter of 1 percent of Americans make 80 percent of all individual
political donations. And corporations, the Republicans' primary source of
funding, outspend labor, the Democrats' chief supporters, 10 to 1.5

Given the disparity in their funding, it's surprising Gore did as well as he did,
winning the popular vote and only losing the election because of Florida's
nostalgic return to Jim Crow-style electioneering' and the political intercession of
five Supreme Court Justices.

In the fall of 2003, inside the Dean campaign, we realized for the first time that
we actually had a shot at winning the nomination, and we began turning our
attention to the Bush money machine-which had, if anything, become even more
formidable than in 2000. The secret to Bush's fund raising is bundling, finding
those corporate donors who can hit up their employees and country club friends
for $1,000 and $2,000 checks. The Bush team calls people who could bring in
$100,000 Pioneers. Donors who bring in $200,000 in bundled checks are called
Rangers. According to an investigative project by the Washington Post, between
1998 and May of 2003, Bush raised $296.3 million and "at least a third of the
total - many sources believe more than half - was raised by 631 people."

The king of these billionaire bundlers, until his company collapsed, leaving
investors and employees high and dry, was Kenneth Lay, head of Enron
("Kenny Boy," as Bush called him) who brought in almost $600,000 for his
old friend. As Lewis writes in The Buying of the President 2004, the key
component of the "Pioneer System" is its nearly obsessive focus on
making sure bundlers get "credit" for their fund-raising work.

Now why would they want to receive credit? Clearly, many donors wanted first-
in-line access to and influence with the prospective new administration. What is
unusual about the Pioneer system is the unabashed directness of the
transaction: You help us and we'll credit you and remember your loyalty and
support later. So what do the Kenny Boy Lays of the world get for their money?
According to the Washington Post's investigation, two of the five people on the
Federal Energy Regulatory Committee were recommended by Lay. So in effect
for his $600,000 he got to chose 40% of the government agency that would

101
regulate his industry...of the 240 fund raisers identified by the Post about 40%
ended up in job appointments, 23 were named as ambassadors and three to the
cabinet. More important is access as more than half of the [Bush] Pioneers are
heads of companies.” – Joe Trippi
Notice women aren’t buying offices and/or buying an appointment to
them. That list of female CEOS? “Ellen Kullman replaced Chad Holliday at
DuPont Thursday to start 2009, which brings to 13 the number of female CEOs
running the USA's largest 500 publicly traded companies. That's a record. But
it's only one more than last year, a year when Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sarah
Palin missed becoming the first female president and vice president, and a year
when frustration continued to mount on the corporate side over the plodding
progress of women.” By Del Jones, USA TODAY It’s not coincidental as there
are no coincidences; it’s proof as gay men have a better chance of becoming
elected than women do: In 2009 there are only 17 female Senators. In all of US
history there have been only 38. 13 were appointed with 7 appointed to succeed
their dead husbands.

150. The Federal Judiciary’s attempts to keep me out and so any and all
living People out then as I represent them constitutes a pattern. So we can and
will hear international custody cases and hear terrorist but not American women,
natural born women if they argue authority? What if that woman must argue
authority to then make her case and the People’s case as three states violated
the FEDERAL US CONSTITUTION to avoid according her justice thus avoid
according all women justice? Please do not insult us any further by naming
appearances like the number of pages or type face. Do not deny history either
as we all know only lawyers or people trained in the law formally have been
allowed entry to SCOTUS. If protecting Obama, a lawyer, is not upholding that
unconstitutionally and is not defending dead paper and is not a massive conflict
of interests on the Federal Judiciary’s part then what is it? Paul Zoss can read:
the SG waived all of his interest and his right as a citizen on 1/01/08 and as an
officer on 11/05/08. Excuse me but wasn’t Obama a sitting officer then? Nobody
but nobody is acting under the authority of the US as of Bush V Gore (it counts if
only I know but now millions of people know) or as of Obama’s installation as
everyone knew he signed 511 thus violated the rights of all natural born citizens
and targeting women as for anyone to posses the authority of the US you must
accord The People informed consent and you, the candidate, must not be
foreign.

102
151. It is a sin to deliberately starve living People. I caught a federal judge
changing a complaint within his ruling and order to then justify his decision when
there was no justification. His application is wrong and in my opinion criminal
due to him changing the complaint and due to what he then said. He said: As
SCOTUS has not stopped me as it has not ruled you are a class and as it will
not stop me as I won’t let you appear in person then I can starve you and so I
will. He said he would literally starve a human being by denying him food via
food stamps as this man was denied food stamps by FL for only being gay. BUT:
This man never filed as a class so the judge was not denying him for gay as if
gay is a class. This was personal as the complaint never said “I’m gay; it’s the
class known as gay FL is harming”. Gay wasn’t the point of law until the judge
made it the point but even if it was? Can you starve a human only for being gay?
When I confronted this judge in a complaint and attached his own ruling plus
legal commentary made by others who read this ruling but did not know this
judge changed complaints within his ruling on a routine basis as it happened to
me? A judge ordered a clerk to pull my complaint from the files. So, it seems the
federal bench can and will starve human beings for being gay and being women
once again reasoning we have rights only in death, or, after we are actually
dead. In my case? The federal bench now tries to starve me the only other way
you can starve a human being, by denying me liberty and justice, denying me
unconditional love, as that too is starvation as if you deny a person justice then
you starve them to death. They will never, ever thrive. They will never, ever
strive. It slowly kills the whole society. Harm women this way and at some point
no more healthy babies. We passed that point as Bush V gore is the conclusion
of the Founders experiment and we flunked as the only way to pass? Let me
appear in person to then defend The People. This nation never, ever accorded
women any actual legal power so the experiment failed unless that woman is
now here. The Founders planned for this. They told us to start shooting if that
woman made it into SCOTUS and out again and now LOWER federal judges not
Justices a d not The People who are not qualified to adjudicate the case keep
saying they are, that we can and will starve you. Nope as we’ll kill you first if
that’s your verdict. ONLY The People and/or the Justices are qualified to opine
in this case. And the Justices are subject to the authority of The People. All this
court can and may do is hear the case in person thereby informing the People.
The People will listen to my side and listen to Obama’s side, we can and will talk
to The People thus informing them, and then the People choose not any judge
as judges do not get two votes and The People never got so much as one if they
were not informed. I defend the People thus defend any judge who is one of The

103
People. Judges like Zoss need to get off the high horse they have been riding
upon as the case for equality means we all get one vote NOT federal judges can
and may violate our rights at their whim and will. He’s NOT a federal judge now
that the officers defaulted but a person with one vote – exactly like me. Zoss’
most disgusting act against me, all women and The People? Allowing
noncauses to enter while he keeps out actual causes, or, allowing noncases w/o
legal standing to proceed while he keeps out good cases with legal standing.
Just like BVG. I’m a woman, a member of the injured class and I belong to no
political party nor ever have. So what keeps e out? Zoss’ pen, that’s what and
his rotten intention and motivations, that’s what as they aren’t honest and they
aren’t constitutional:

152. Zoss ignored the fact that NY State allowed the third parties involved,
the Austin’s, who received my children after they had been illegally and in
violation of the law removed from PA so they were and are in violation of
the UCCCJ, and who were paid to participate in their kidnapping and the
human trafficking of my person in the form of a $1 house (Zoss read the
deed I attached) to then return to NY after NY first remanded jurisdiction to
PA and to act against me by wholly making up a cause of action as they
had none! That is, NY allowed them to enter what is not an actual cause of
action in any state whatsoever to then file for third party custody as what
the Austin’s, Quninoes’ and Herbert’s – violent family members - wanted
from day one was termination of my rights w/o actually terminating them
as they knew they couldn’t do it and they sought to use my kids as pawns,
to keep me from pursuing justice. What Zoss says never happened on the
most fundamental level of all, family court:

153. The Austin’s “won” custody based upon this false claim: “We need
insurance thus want the kids permanently.” I entered the arguments made.
The Austin’s actually entered this - INSURANCE – as their cause to then
take third party PERMANENT custody of my kids when really it was
nothing more than an attack against me. Thus here is most of the
complaint filed against the third parties: As SCOTUS petitions 07-9804,
08-6622 and 09-6777 state and as the complaints now before this court
state (See Herbert V Obama) the counties in several states victimized me
and even committed crimes against me.

104
154. Rennselaer county NY and so agents of the county lied under oath,
manipulated facts, manufactured facts, ignored the law, violated the law,
tampered with evidence and with proof, manipulated the system, acted
upon unconstitutional policy and even perjured themselves under oath to
then make the awarding of the custody of my children and the injury my
person suffered at their hands seem to be legal and justified. Some of
these officials went so far as to abuse my children with full knowing and
deliberation. Others were caught in the act of violating their mandates and
their licenses and at least one agent, Leslie Ortiz, a lawyer and my
children's guardian ad litum abused my children by pretending she did not
understand them when they told her they had been kidnapped and that
they wanted to live with me, their real mother, and which she then failed to
report to any person and even denied in her written assessment as if my
children never told her, and who engaged in a relationship outside of the
court with the persons who injured us as she was at the time and might
still be a neighbor of the third parties. I myself caught her in the act, as she
was caught in very close, intimate conversation with Cate Austin in the
bathroom of the Rennselaer County courthouse during a break in the
proceedings.

155. Another agent, a social worker, failed to report abuse she

witnessed and later a master for the state lied under oath as they claimed
that no such report existed against David Austin when it did and when
someone had blacked out the name of the reporter - me. The social
worker, Allanna McMillan, acting in conjunction with the Austin's and one
Randy Cale, a person hired solely to manufacture evidence against me
and in favor of the Austin's and who is known to be a “court whore”,
COUNTY EMPLOYEES INCLUDING GRIFFIN’S OWN CLERK TOLD ME
AND MY ATTORNEY THIS EXACTLY and who testified to the impossible
upon the witness stand and who reported that he knew the real reason
Cate Austin had brought my children to him was so that he would then
generate a report against me, he actually said it was about blame when he
testified, then concocted a report against me and based her false finding
upon: Stories told about me from a time before my children were even
born. She interviewed out of state nonwitnesses and never spoke to me;

105
this incredulous report and subsequent finding was dismissed by NY but it
was during this fair hearing that the master for the state perjured himself
and that the report against David Austin was blacked out and then
unbelievably entered against me! As if it was a report I generated against
my own self! My lawyer smelled a rat so she said if the state was insisting
that the reports used to find me were the same report and not separate,
different reports as NY claimed as they did not match so NY's claim made
no sense then NY would have no objection to her entering BOTH reports
to then prove the report that I abused my children was falsified by
McMillan and that it only came to be as the Austin's sought revenge.
Trapped by their own lies NY agreed and then later admitted McMillan had
zero grounds to ever find me guilty of abuse. The state and county never
did take action against the actual abuser, David Austin, nor did it ever
admit to its perjury or to its tampering of the evidence. No action was ever
taken against any of the involved people who to this day are allowed to
harm women and children with immunity. See Austin V Herbert, a legally
enforced kidnapping perpetrated by the county of Rennselaer and the
state of NY which is partly the result of favor and partisan politics. Details
of these acts are found within the lower federal court and within SCOTUS
petitions 079804, 08-6622 and 09-6777. They are too numerous to name
here; literally I can name hundreds of acts and all of them are egregious. I
submitted the entire paper trail proving all of my claims to the federal
courthouse in Jacksonville FL. NY never had the legal right to hear this
case; in fact like BVG there was no actual case to be had but the county
allowed the Austin's to manufacture one by first making up a fantasy
cause of action: The petition the Austin's submitted in the spring of 2001
stated that the Austin's were seeking third party custody of my children
and my person as they needed MEDICAL INSURANCE. MEDICAL
INSURANCE IS NOT AN ACTUAL CAUSE OF ACTION IN THE CASE
OF THE CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN ANY STATE. IT IS OFFENSIVE
TO EVERYONE OF MY SENSIBILITIES THAT NY AND THIS COUNTY
ALLOWED THIRD PARTIES ENTRY AND HEARD THIS CLAIM AND
THEN HORRIFICALLY LET THE AUSTIN'S CHANGE THE CLAIM
GRADUALLY OVER THE COURSE OF 4 YEARS UNTIL IT WAS
UNRECOGNIZABLE. LITERALLY NY AND THIS COUNTY AND SO ALL
OF THE AGENTS STATE AND COUNTY BECAME OUR ABUSER AND

106
 THE PERPETRATORS FOR W/O THEM? THERE WAS NO CASE!
INSURANCE IS NOT A CAUSE TO TAKE CHILDREN FROM THE
MOTHER PLUS THE AUSTINS NEVER DENIED THAT THE CHILDREN
ONLY CAME TO BE WITH THEM AS THEY PARTICIPATED IN A
KIDNAPPING.

156. Thus there is zero excuse for the County of Rennselaer. I asked
over and over WHY Randy Cale was allowed to enter the County
courthouse if it was common knowledge he was being paid to abuse
children and I never received an answer other than that “judges know to
ignore him” and “judges do not listen to anything he says”. The real, actual
reason is much more sinister: County employees know Cale to be a hired
gun, a “court whore” but as parents might not? A judge uses him exactly
like the lawyer Finkle did as did the Austin’s to then force a ruling that
goes against all acceptable evidence and proof. In my case his testimony
was upheld as sterling by Griffin when it was her own court clerk who said
Griffin would never do this as she knew all about Cale. Griffin then rejects
Cale’s testimony when it benefits her agenda and uses it when it benefits
her agenda- as all judges do. Most telling? If you bother to read Cale’s
report he assigns blame to my person; he says my children seemed opt
be angry and says it is anger at me when my kids NEVER said that. He
uses words to make it seem as if and when he knows he can’t testify to
anything about me unless he meets me in person. I not only proved Cale
perjured himself by testifying to the impossible but that he tampered with
his own records in order to hide what my kids did tell him and to hide the
fact that he abused them in his office. When I told my attorney three years
after the fact? She was stunned. Guess what? It has to do with the
difference between absolute and whole numbers – again like BVG as the
injury is endemic or from the lone citizen up to the office of President - and
so only an extremely observant person who knows her math inside out as
well as is an expert in human behavior would ever have discovered this,
that is, I knew Cale had done what my children reported to me and what I
myself heard him admit from upon the witness stand but when my attorney
asked me to prove it as if she had never been in the room to hear his
testimony she was blown away when I told her HOW it was very easy to
prove as it never occurred to her. Thus Rennselaer and counties all

107
 across this nation have no excuse and no reason for what they have done
as I have encountered this courtroom nonsense in over 5 states. It’s proof
that men have no protected right of custody of children and that giving it to
them as a right then violates the original separation of powers known as
biology thus causing women and children to be sold and humanly
trafficked across state lines and by county and state authorities. SCOTUS
created a situation whereby the abuse and battery of women is
inescapable as men are allowed to use the courts to do it. Lawyers know
this but refuse to bring the case as it means less money for them. MONEY
was always the reason lawyers cited when refusing to act and/or to
represent me. ALL counties in the US have discriminatory and unjust
policies that harm women and their children as they justify their actions by
citing SCOTUS rulings decided in error and even wrongly; to justify the
injury they deny reality and ignore all fact and law.

157. Philadelphia county had unjust policy targeting women - to ignore all
claims of domestic violence but in Philadelphia it was taken a step further:
My children and my person were placed in protective custody. While in
protective custody our named batterers then petitioned the court to gain
custody of the children and so stop me from criminally prosecuting them
as the children were used as threat against me as in "if you prosecute us
you’ll never see them again". Our named batterers were not only allowed
to petition the court but were also allowed to manipulate the docket by
being heard first - to prevent me from appearing as they were concerned
I'd find out they had entered a petition and so appear. They and their
attorney perjured themselves and even though they were named as our
batterers they were given my children; my children were removed from
protective custody and handed over to the very people named as those
we needed to be protected from! Upon direct confrontation I was told
Philadelphia County had a policy to award children to any related person
even the named batterers as it then saved the county money! Later
Philadelphia County invoked other unconstitutional policy, to deny the
reality of domestic violence and to deny the reality that women are victims,
and Philadelphia county also refused to acknowledge the Constitution
both state and federal applied to me or my kids. 5 judges came and went
and all 5 refused to acknowledge all fact or law; all actively sought to

108
 dump the case as they knew it was SCOTUS bound due to how my
children ever came to be in the custody of the Herbert's and then the
Austin's. But not their father or me. Again the number of acts prevents me
from listing them all separately and I did enter the paper trail to the federal
court already but I must name the most serious action of all which the
officers of the Philadelphia courts should hang for:

158. David Austin and I were and are strangers to one another and are
of no relation not even via marriage. This man not only did not know me
but he and I weren't related then and are not now. If you read the affidavit
the Austin's entered to then secure standing in the courts only David
Austin filed and only he filled it out. He and his lawyer perjured themselves
VERBALLY claiming we are related and VERBALLY claiming that they
had no idea where I was and that I could not stand as I was incapacitated,
a lie, when they then filled in, in WRITING, "North Dakota" as my physical
location and left each and every space regarding my person blank up to
and including eye and hair color when my hair is unmistakably red - if you
ever laid eyes on me which David Austin had not as we are absolute
strangers. The children's actual relation, Cate Austin, signed nothing and
may not have even appeared that day. David Austin's motive was
ownership of a house, the $1 deed of which I entered, as that is what he
was paid to commit perjury. BUT: What Philadelphia County did? What
that judge did by upholding that affidavit that completely conflicted with the
verbal testimony and so awarding the Austin's temporary custody of me
and my kids? It's as if in Philadelphia county and later the other counties
ruled that a person, a man with zero interest and zero right, can walk to a
park, pick out two kids he likes and then go to a courthouse and say, "I
just saw two kids I want to steal. What do I fill out so I can get away with
kidnapping kids that are not mine and that I'm not even related to?" and as
if Philadelphia then said it was acceptable and even legal to pick two kids
at random and file for custody of them. To my knowledge Philadelphia
County has not stopped allowing unrelated men from filing - as long as
they hire a criminal lawyer who will VERBALLY support the lies they tell in
court; the county has never once checked the written affidavits against the
verbal testimony and/or actual reality. When I brought this up judges
began dropping like flies. Believe it or not this isn't the worst thing that

109
 happened to us in Philadelphia County but is the event I find most
incredulous. In 1996 and 1997 Duval County unconstitutionally dismissed
felony assault charges against one of our batterers; the county and state
admitted to unconstitutional policy targeting women: It said it routinely
dismissed charges made against Navy personnel. It only contacted me
after the fact thus those felony assault charges remain as does something
else: My sons legal status as an unborn person who is now 13 years old.
My children had their rights violated before their birth and one of them has
managed to preserve that legal standing as I not once failed to act in his
defense not even when the entire US Navy set its sights on me in an
attempt to shake me. FL and Duval County caved but I did not. To this
very day Duval county continues to act against me as it now refuses to
hear emergency motions and refuses to let me represent myself; Duval
County told me over and over that it did not allow parents to represent
their own persons. At one point county agents physically held me against
my will in an attempt to stop me from filing the paperwork and only
released me when I threatened to go back to SCOTUS and name them
individually. They flinched when I informed them that they would find my
name on the SCOTUS docket two times over thus I could and would go
after them. Upon filing those papers which is an emergency motion? Both
family court judges ran, they literally and actually ran as they went home
and then called in sick the next day and to date this motion sits
unaddressed within the court. It is now about two years old. NOTHING
that subsequently happened to my kids or me could have happened if FL
and Duval County had obeyed the law of FL and the law of the US in
1996. Yes, I would have been injured and yes Bush V Gore would have
happened and injured me further but my kids? They would not have
suffered for a single day once I filed those felony assault charges. The
counties and their agents abused us more and worse than any family
member ever did and so the counties and their agents caused my death, a
physical death I survived, and caused my children's most severe injuries
both physical and metal.

159. Approximately a year and a half ago FL admitted to other

unjust policy that targeted women and made the injury inescapable as it
subjected women to repeated assault and even lethal danger: Besides

110
 their policy to never press charges if the spouse was a Navy spouse FL
had policy that dictated the state was not to press charges if a woman was
strangled into unconsciousness but did not die as prosecuting the case
was difficult and expensive thus women were denied remedy and relief
and their batterers walked. FL is not alone in doing this so men learned
exactly how to abuse women but not pay the price; that is they learned
what they could and could not do to women as the states did not
prosecute some crimes like attempted strangulation. .About a year and a
half ago FL admitted to this policy and passed new law regarding
attempted strangulation – as the cases were increasing. Why wouldn’t
they if FL wasn’t prosecuting them??? I was a victim l this policy as the 2 nd
degree assault charges were fro attempted strangulation and holding me
at knifepoint for about eight hours while pregnant. FL has a 911 call it
refused to release to me and my attorneys; to this day i have never
received a copy of this call although FL admits it exists.

160. I count Sanford Finkle and Arnold Weinstein as court

officers as that is what they pretended to be and that is what Sanford
Finkle told the US Marshal's Office that he was; he misrepresented himself
as an officer acting for the Rennselaer county court, as if the court asked
him to do so or as if it was his official job. Arnold Weinstein acted to white
out his name but not his secretary's name on copies of early court
documents he faxed to my attorney, to me and to the subsequent courts
as he understood exactly what he did by signing and entering that false
affidavit and when fabricating a false court petition, when making a bad
case he always knew was not an actual case. Sanford Finkle and his
action is more heinous in my opinion as every single event in NY and that
happened after the fact of the December 2000 Philadelphia County Court
appearance and ruling and that is still happening today, even the federal
activity, can be directly traced to his person. That is, he caused it all by
first entering that made up cause of action, INSURANCE, and later
authoring and entering closing arguments and an appellate brief that
contained zero fact, zero supporting evidence, zero case law and zero
cause; as he completely made up INSURANCE as a cause of action he
then had no case law and no evidence. The one thing he entered NY says
you may not give weight to and Griffin did not. Sanford Finkle is even

111
connected to NY Appellate Judge J. Mugglin who authored an exactly
worded violation of the bill of rights in my case as he had nothing to use –
cite - and/or rely upon to then rule against me so he too made it up only
badly so and Finkle is also connected to employees of Albany Law School
who lied to me, injured me with impunity and who leaked confidential
information contained in my file - it is one exact person named Lorraine
and I already entered the proof to the federal court - as well as the lawyer
who deliberately lost my case as he did not argue what I and my family
court attorney ordered him to argue and whose facts are custom tailored
to my own. While I do not know exactly how Greg Rinckey came to be
assigned to my case as it was not random I can and did connect Rinckey
to Sanford Finkle and to Linda Griffin and Finkle is the reason, the cause, I
ever came to meet Griffin, McMillan, Ortiz and Cale or even the master for
the state of NY. Everything after December of 2000 is directly due to his
person and his actions. Let him blame the Austin's for hiring him or for
Griffin listening to his non-argument as Finkle's reputation in Rennselaer
county and in the Albany area is if you want and need a slimeball who will
do anything for a buck then hire Sanford Finkle. As I was raised in this
area I know plus Finkle is the guy who wrote an exact lie, slapped it on the
last page of his appellate non-argument and so invalidated a good
contract upon appeal thus I wouldn't be able to sue the Austin's for that
house as if I did? He wouldn't get paid or so the seller, Catherine Garrett,
told me. It's common knowledge among lawyers as judges know to look
for this slimy behavior and that any lawyer who does it is scum of the
Earth and so is any judge who pretends he does not know it, as he
assumes Susan is stupid as she's a woman without a paper license. As
I'm an attorney who knows at least one other ethical attorney and plenty of
unethical ones I know this; I was told this to my face several times over.
Law schools teach this trick and Albany Law did not deny it upon direct
confrontation. I'm a victim who knew but was forced to sit back and watch
her victimization unfold as no action on my part was ever going to stop it
save for forcing SCOTUS to act directly upon my direct entry whether they
then filed the paperwork or not as a part of my knowledge is the criminal
activity in the cases of women and in my case is endemic today. SCOTUS
announced it would harm me when I first contacted it in February of 2007;
as not one woman ever made the case for equality and no male scientist

112
 ever resolved Uniformity I then knew the threat the SCOTUS clerks made
would come to be realized as I was it; my testimony has always been that
the clerk named will said he knew what elements to look for in the case of
equality and that I seemed to be the case so he would sink me and my
case -THE case - and so would the other clerks. If the vote of a woman
has never, ever had actual legal power why wouldn't I believe him? Why
wouldn't I believe any and all threats ever made against my person by the
people who face jail time for what they did to me and my sons? Did PA,
NY or FL and the involved counties and officers ever truly believe I wasn't
threatened and wasn't harmed? The answer is: they don't put people
who are safe into protective custody; they reserve it for those whose
lives are in actual danger. In the person of Susan Herbert, as they
could not make her their victim and could not force her to be guilty
as I am not they knew they met their match and that I was SCOTUS
bound thus liability would ensue – for all women and children so
they felt they HAD to get rid of me, harm me and even kill me - to
protect the status quo. Most obviously and blatantly Rinckey's partner
took over for Griffin when she retired so Finkle has an even closer, more
friendly buddy on the Rennselaer County Family court bench: Rinckey's
firm is named Tully, Rinckey and Associates; that exact Tully took over in
place of Linda Griffin.

161. As SCOTUS petitions 07-9804, 08-6622 and 09-6777 state

and as the complaints now before this court state (See Herbert V Obama)
the counties in several states victimized me and even committed crimes
against me. Rennselaer county NY and so agents of the county lied under
oath, manipulated facts, manufactured facts, ignored the law, violated the
law, tampered with evidence and with proof, manipulated the system,
acted upon unconstitutional policy and even perjured themselves under
oath to then make the awarding of the custody of my children and the
injury my person suffered at their hands seem to be legal and justified.
Some of these officials went so far as to abuse my children with full
knowing and deliberation. Others were caught in the act of violating their
mandates and their licenses and at least one agent, Leslie Ortiz, a lawyer
and my children's guardian ad litum abused my children by pretending she
did not understand them when they told her they had been kidnapped and

113
 that they wanted to live with me, their real mother, and which she then
failed to report to any person and even denied in her written assessment
as if my children never told her, and who engaged in a relationship outside
of the court with the persons who injured us as she was at the time and
might still be a neighbor of the third parties. I myself caught her in the act,
as she was caught in very close, intimate conversation with Cate Austin in
the bathroom of the Rennselaer County courthouse during a break in the
proceedings.

162. Another agent, a social worker, failed to report abuse she

witnessed and later a master for the state lied under oath as they claimed
that no such report existed against David Austin when it did and when
someone had blacked out the name of the reporter - me. The social
worker, Allanna McMillan, acting in conjunction with the Austin's and one
Randy Cale, a person hired solely to manufacture evidence against me
and in favor of the Austin's and who is known to be a “court whore”,
COUNTY EMPLOYEES INCLUDING GRIFFIN’S OWN CLERK TOLD ME
AND MY ATTORNEY THIS EXACTLY and who testified to the impossible
upon the witness stand and who reported that he knew the real reason
Cate Austin had brought my children to him was so that he would then
generate a report against me, he actually said it was about blame when he
testified, then concocted a report against me and based her false finding
upon: Stories told about me from a time before my children were even
born. She interviewed out of state nonwitnesses and never spoke to me;
this incredulous report and subsequent finding was dismissed by NY but it
was during this fair hearing that the master for the state perjured himself
and that the report against David Austin was blacked out and then
unbelievably entered against me! As if it was a report I generated against
my own self! My lawyer smelled a rat so she said if the state was insisting
that the reports used to find me were the same report and not separate,
different reports as NY claimed as they did not match so NY's claim made
no sense then NY would have no objection to her entering BOTH reports
to then prove the report that I abused my children was falsified by
McMillan and that it only came to be as the Austin's sought revenge.
Trapped by their own lies NY agreed and then later admitted McMillan had
zero grounds to ever find me guilty of abuse. The state and county never

114
 did take action against the actual abuser, David Austin, nor did it ever
admit to its perjury or to its tampering of the evidence. No action was ever
taken against any of the involved people who to this day are allowed to
harm women and children with immunity. See Austin V Herbert, a legally
enforced kidnapping perpetrated by the county of Rennselaer and the
state of NY which is partly the result of favor and partisan politics. Details
of these acts are found within the lower federal court and within SCOTUS
petitions 079804, 08-6622 and 09-6777. They are too numerous to name
here; literally I can name hundreds of acts and all of them are egregious. I
submitted the entire paper trail proving all of my claims to the federal
courthouse in Jacksonville FL. NY never had the legal right to hear this
case; in fact like BVG there was no actual case to be had but the county
allowed the Austin's to manufacture one by first making up a fantasy
cause of action: The petition the Austin's submitted in the spring of 2001
stated that the Austin's were seeking third party custody of my children
and my person as they needed MEDICAL INSURANCE. MEDICAL
INSURANCE IS NOT AN ACTUAL CAUSE OF ACTION IN THE CASE
OF THE CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN ANY STATE. IT IS OFFENSIVE
TO EVERYONE OF MY SENSIBILITIES THAT NY AND THIS COUNTY
ALLOWED THIRD PARTIES ENTRY AND HEARD THIS CLAIM AND
THEN HORRIFICALLY LET THE AUSTIN'S CHANGE THE CLAIM
GRADUALLY OVER THE COURSE OF 4 YEARS UNTIL IT WAS
UNRECOGNIZABLE. LITERALLY NY AND THIS COUNTY AND SO ALL
OF THE AGENTS STATE AND COUNTY BECAME OUR ABUSER AND
THE PERPETRATORS FOR W/O THEM? THERE WAS NO CASE!
INSURANCE IS NOT A CAUSE TO TAKE CHILDREN FROM THE
MOTHER PLUS THE AUSTINS NEVER DENIED THAT THE CHILDREN
ONLY CAME TO BE WITH THEM AS THEY PARTICIPATED IN A
KIDNAPPING.

163. Thus there is zero excuse for the County of Rennselaer. I

aksed over and over WHY Randy Cale was allowed to enter the County
courthouse if it was common knowledge he was being paid to abuse
children and I never received an answer other than that “judges know to
ignore him” and “judges do not listen to anything he says”. The real, actual
reason is much more sinister: County employees know Cale ot be a hired

115
gun, a “court whore” but as parents might not? A judge uses him exactly
like the lawyer Finkle did as did the Austin’s to then force a ruling that
goes against all acceptable evidence and proof. In my case his testimony
was upheld as sterling by Griffin when it was her own court clerk who said
Griffin would never do this as she knew all about Cale. Griffin then rejects
Cale’s testimony when it benefits her agenda and uses it when it benefits
her agenda- as all judges do. Most telling? If you bother to read Cale’s
report he assigns blame to my person; he says my children seemed opt
be angry and says it is anger at me when my kids NEVER said that. He
uses words to make it seem as if and when he knows he can’t testify to
anything about me unless he meets me in person. I not only proved Cale
perjured himself by testifying to the impossible but that he tampered with
his own records in order to hide what my kids did tell him and to hide the
fact that he abused them in his office. When I told my attorney three years
after the fact? She was stunned. Guess what? It has to do with the
difference between absolute and whole numbers – again like BVG as the
injury is endemic or from the lone citizen up to the office of President - and
so only an extremely observant person who knows her math inside out as
well as is an expert in human behavior would ever have discovered this,
that is, I knew Cale had done what my children reported to me and what I
myself heard him admit from upon the witness stand but when my attorney
asked me to prove it as if she had never been in the room to hear his
testimony she was blown away when I told her HOW it was very easy to
prove as it never occurred to her. Thus Rennselaer and counties all
across this nation have no excuse and no reason for what they have done
as I have encountered this courtroom nonsense in over 5 states. It’s proof
that men have no protected right of custody of children and that giving it to
them as a right then violates the original separation of powers known as
biology thus causing women and children to be sold and humanly
trafficked across state lines and by county and state authorities. SCOTUS
created a situation whereby the abuse and battery of women is
inescapable as men are allowed to use the courts to do it. Lawyers know
this but refuse to bring the case as it means less money for them. MONEY
was always the reason lawyers cited when refusing to act and/or to
represent me.. ALL counties in the US have discriminatory and unjust
policies that harm women and their children as they justify their actions by

116
 citing SCOTUS rulings decided in error and even wrongly; to justify the
injury they deny reality and ignore all fact and law.

164. Philadelphia county had unjust policy targeting women - to

ignore all claims of domestic violence but in Philadelphia it was taken a
step further: My children and my person were placed in protective custody.
While in protective custody our named batterers then petitioned the court
to gain custody of the children and so stop me from criminally prosecuting
them as the children were used as threat against me as in "if you
prosecute us youll never see them again". Our named bafterers were not
only allowed to petition the court but were also allowed to manipulate the
docket by being heard first - to prevent me from appearing as they were
concerned I'd find out they had entered a petition and so appear. They
and their attorney perjured themselves and even though they were named
as our batterers they were given my children; my children were removed
from protective custody and handed over to the very people named as
those we needed to be protected from! Upon direct confrontation I was
told Philadelphia County had a policy to award children to any related
person even the named batterers as it then saved the county money!
Later Philadelphia County invoked other unconstitutional policy, to deny
the reality of domestic violence and to deny the reality that women are
victims, and Philadelphia county also refused to acknowledge the
Constitution both state and federal applied to me or my kids. 5 judges
came and went and all 5 refused to acknowledge all fact or law; all actively
sought to dump the case as they knew it was SCOTUS bound due to how
my children ever came to be in the custody of the Herbert's and then the
Austin's. But not their father or me. Again the number of acts prevents me
from listing them all separately and I did enter the paper trail to the federal
court already but I must name the most serious action of all which the
officers of the Philadelphia courts should hang for:

165. David Austin and I were and are strangers to one another
and are of no relation not even via marriage. This man not only did not
know me but he and I weren't related then and are not now. If you read the
affidavit the Austin's entered to then secure standing in the courts only
David Austin filed and only he filled it out. He and his lawyer perjured

117
themselves VERBALLY claiming we are related and VERBALLY claiming
that they had no idea where I was and that I could not stand as I was
incapacitated, a lie, when they then filled in, in WRITING, "North Dakota"
as my physical location and left each and every space regarding my
person blank up to and including eye and hair color when my hair is
unmistakably red - if you ever laid eyes on me which David Austin had not
as we are absolute strangers. The children's actual relation, Cate Austin,
signed nothing and may not have even appeared that day. David Austin's
motive was ownership of a house, the $1 deed of which I entered, as that
is what he was paid to commit perjury. BUT: What Philadelphia County
did? What that judge did by upholding that affidavit that completely
conflicted with the verbal testimony and so awarding the Austin's
temporary custody of me and my kids? It's as if in Philadelphia county and
later the other counties ruled that a person, a man with zero interest and
zero right, can walk to a park, pick out two kids he likes and then go to a
courthouse and say, "I just saw two kids I want to steal. What do I fill out
so I can get away with kidnapping kids that are not mine and that I'm not
even related to?" and as if Philadelphia then said it was acceptable and
even legal to pick two kids at random and file for custody of them! To my
knowledge Philadelphia county has not stopped allowing unrelated men
from filing -as long as they hire a criminal lawyer who will VERBALLY
support the lies they tell in court; the county has never once checked the
fiw affidavits against the verbal testimony and/or actual reality. When I
brought this up judges began dropping like flies. Believe it or not this isn't
the worst thing that happened to us in Philadelphia County but is the event
I find most incredulous. In 1996 and 1997 Duval County unconstitutionally
dismissed felony assault charges against one of our batterers; the county
and state admitted to unconstitutional policy targeting women: It said it
routinely dismissed charges made against Navy personnel. It only
contacted me after the fact thus those felony assault charges remain as
does something else: My sons legal status as an unborn person who is
now 13 years old. My children had their rights violated before their birth
and one of them has managed to preserve that legal standing as I not
once failed to act in his defense not even when the entire US Navy set its
sights on me in an attempt to shake me. FL and Duval County caved but I
did not. To this very day Duval county continues to act against me as it

118
 now refuses to hear emergency motions and refuses to let me represent
myself; Duval County told me over and over that it did not allow parents to
represent their own persons. At one point county agents physically held
me against my will in an attempt to stop me from filing the paperwork and
only released me when I threatened to go back to SCOTUS and name
them individually. They flinched when I informed them that they would find
my name on the SCOTUS docket two times over thus I could and would
go after them. Upon filing those papers which is an emergency motion?
Both family court judges ran, they literally and actually ran as they went
home and then called in sick the next day and to date this motion sits
unaddressed within the court. It is now about two years old. NOTHING
that subsequently happened to my kids or me could have happened if FL
and Duval County had obeyed the law of FL and the law of the US in
1996. Yes, I would have been injured and yes Bush V Gore would have
happened and injured me further but my kids? They would not have
suffered for a single day once I filed those felony assault charges. The
counties and their agents abused us more and worse than any family
member ever did and so the counties and their agents caused my death, a
physical death I survived, and caused my children's most severe injuries
both physical and metal.

166. Approximately a year and a half ago FL admitted to other

unjust policy that targeted women and made the injury inescapable as it
subjected women to repeated assault and even lethal danger: Besides
their policy to never press charges if the spouse was a Navy spouse FL
had policy that dictated the state was not to press charges if a woman was
strangled into unconsciousness but did not die as prosecuting the case
was difficult and expensive thus women were denied remedy and relief
and their batterers walked. FL is not alone in doing this so men learned
exactly how to abuse women but not pay the price; that is they learned
what they could and could not do to women as the states did not
prosecute some crimes like attempted strangulation. .About a year and a
half ago FL admitted ot this policy and passed new law regarding
attempted strangulation – as the cases were increasing. Why wouldn’t
they if FL wasn’t prosecuting them??? I was a victim l this policy as the 2 nd
degree assault charges were fro attempted strangulation and holding me

119
 at knifepoint for about eight hours while pregnant. FL has a 911 call it
refused to release to me and my attorneys; to this day i have never
received a copy of this call although FL admits it exists.

167. I count Sanford Finkle and Arnold Weinstein as court

officers as that is what they pretended to be and that is what Sanford
Finkle told the US Marshal's Office that he was; he misrepresented himself
as an officer acting for the Rennselaer county court, as if the court asked
him to do so or as if it was his official job. Arnold Weinstein acted to white
out his name but not his secretary's name on copies of early court
documents he faxed to my attorney, to me and to the subsequent courts
as he understood exactly what he did by signing and entering that false
affidavit and when fabricating a false court petition, when making a bad
case he always knew was not an actual case. Sanford Finkle and his
action is more heinous in my opinion as every single event in NY and that
happened after the fact of the December 2000 Philadelphia County Court
appearance and ruling and that is,ig still happening today, even the
federal activity, can be directly traced to his person. That is, he caused it
all by first entering that made up cause of action, INSURANCE, and later
authoring and entering closing arguments and an appellate brief that
contained zero fact, zero supporting evidence, zero case law and zero
cause; as he completely made up INSURANCE as a cause of action he
then had no case law and no evidence. The one thing he entered NY says
you may not give weight to and Griffin did not. Sanford Finkle is even
connected to NY Appellate Judge J. Mugglin who authored an exactly
worded violation of the bill of rights in my case as he had no thing to use –
cite - and/or rely upon to then rule against me so he too made it up only
badly so and Finkle is also connected to employees of Albany Law School
who lied to me, injured me with impunity and who leaked confidential
information contained in my file - it is one exact person named Lorraine
and I already entered the proof to the federal court - as well as the lawyer
who deliberately lost my case as he did not argue what I and my family
court attorney ordered him to argue and whose facts are custom tailored
to my own. While I do not know exactly how Greg Rinckey came to be
assigned to my case as it was not random I can and did connect Rinckey
to Sanford Finkle and to Linda Griffin and Finkle is the reason, the cause, I

120
ever came to meet Griffin, McMillan, Ortiz and Cale or even the master for
the state of NY. Everything after December of 2000 is directly due to his
person and his actions. Let him blame the Austin's for hiring him or for
Griffin listening to his non-argument as Finkle's reputation in Rennselaer
county and in the Albany area is if you want and need a slimeball who will
do anything for a buck then hire Sanford Finkle. As I was raised in this
area I know plus Finkle is the guy who wrote an exact lie, slapped it on the
last page of his appellate non-argument and so invalidated a good
contract upon appeal thus I wouldn't be able to sue the Austin's for that
house as if I did? He wouldn't get paid or so the seller, Catherine Garrett,
told me. It's common knowledge among lawyers as judges know to look
for this slimy behavior and that any lawyer who does it is scum of the
Earth and so is any judge who pretends he does not know it, as he
assumes Susan is stupid as she's a woman without a paper license. As
I'm an attorney who knows at least one other ethical attorney and plenty of
unethical ones I know this; I was told this to my face several times over.
Law schools teach this trick and Albany Law did not deny it upon direct
confrontation. I'm a victim who knew but was forced to sit back and watch
her victimization unfold as no action on my part was ever going to stop it
save for forcing SCOTUS to act directly upon my direct entry whether they
then filed the paperwork or not as a part of my knowledge is the criminal
activity in the cases of women and in my case is endemic today. SCOTUS
announced it would harm me when I first contacted it in February of 2007;
as not one woman ever made the case for equality and no male scientist
ever resolved Uniformity I then knew the threat the SCOTUS clerks made
would come to be realized as I was it; my testimony has always been that
the clerk named will said he knew what elements to look for in the case of
equality and that I seemed to be the case so he would sink me and my
case -THE case - and so would the other clerks. If the vote of a woman
has never, ever had actual legal power why wouldn't I believe him? Why
wouldn't I believe any and all threats ever made against my person by the
people who face jail time for what they did to me and my sons? Did PA,
NY or FL and the involved counties and officers ever truly believe I wasn't
threatened and wasn't harmed? The answer is: they don't put people
who are safe into protective custody; they reserve it for those whose
lives are in actual danger. In the person of Susan Herbert, as they

121
 could not make her their victim and could not force her to be guilty
as I am not they knew they met their match and that I was SCOTUS
bound thus liability would ensue – for all women and children so
they felt they HAD to get rid of me, harm me and even kill me - to
protect the status quo. Most obviously and blatantly Rinckey's partner
took over for Griffin when she retired so Finkle has an even closer, more
friendly buddy on the Rennselaer County Family court bench: Rinckey's
firm is named Tully, Rinckey and Associates; that exact Tully took over in
place of Linda Griffin.

168. You can never ever ignore or deny the fact that the house sold
for $1 was owned by Garrett Murphy, the DEMOCRATIC national director
of literacy for NY State and that the Austin’s have a relative with a law
license who I was told had ties to Albany Law and who advised them on
what to do if their lie was detected by the Appellate judges. Hmmmm,
what if they never knew their attorney, Finkle, set this up in their name?
So when it is pointed out to them they scream they did not bribe anybody?
They bribed Finkle by paying him to do whatever he needed to do never
considering the corruption was endemic or did they as who lobbied so
hard o return to NY, a state in which they had zero standing but got it
regardless? I’m not crazy folks as all of this happened. I have little or no
cash so I got burned as I was never perceived to be the threat I turned out
to become – by willing myself to power, by willing myself to do what none
of you were willing to do: Make the case for women at long last. I’m not
supposed to be forced to prove my case in my complaint or to prove
anything at all in writing but in person. So far all federal judges have
proven is: NOTHING a pro se woman writes will ever satisfy them as what
they want is for women to fail and so all citizens will be their slaves and
their indentured servants forever. All federal judges want this as the case
for equality means federal judges have to start applying the law to their
own persons thus no special favor anymore. If they did not personally
want this? Why keep the case out? Why resort to garbage like “insufficient
fact” when all of my written testimony is 1st person eyewitness sworn
testimony thus it is HISTORY so you do not get to even claim that at all as
it is always a lie, an exact lie if you do? FEDERAL JUDGES ARE
DENYING HISTORY; LIKE WHITE SUPREMACISTS DENY THE

122
 HOLOCAUST FEDERAL JUDGES DENY WE WON THE REVOLUTION,
DENY BUSH V GORE WAS HEARD AND DENY WOMEN ARE HUMAN
AND ARE EQUAL TO MEN. THEY DENY THE LONE CITIZEN IS EQUAL
TO A FEDERAL JUDGE EVEN THOUGH OUR FOUNDERS AND THEN
JOHN MARSHALL SAID THE LONE MALE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS
EQUAL TO THE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER, THAT ONE VOTE IS
EQUIVALENT TO AN EXECUTIVE ORDER. If none of this history
happened then how did you ever become a federal judge? Where are my
children and why? And how did I come to be alone, forever pro se and the
only the second American ever to enter SCOTUS directly? How did
SCOTUS ever come to exist if none of this happened? Insufficient fact and
no arguable basis is not it or SCOTUS would not have entered me let
alone acted upon The People’s case and my case, both one and the
same.

169. No woman is safe in these counties or in any county in this

nation as this is going on everywhere, as that is what the word endemic
means. Corruption that rose from the lone citizen and is within the entire
government harms them in our most fundamental court, family court, the
point of entry to the system and so the law for most women. It causes a
situation whereby the nuclear family backed by the county and its agents
is the reason women are initially shut out of the process in such a way
they are incapacitated thus experience only what is undue and unjust
upon every level of society. No liberty and injustice is then 'imprinted' upon
their person and their children's persons, as if women are actually weak
and les than. My crime? Overcoming this by doing what no man ever did
thus proving via action tat I am equal to the Chief Justice or President as I
made the case no other human could. Because you can’t wrap your head
around the reasoning, because you can’t understand the logic, and as you
can’t admit a woman bested you at your own game then that does not give
you the power and authority to then harm me with impunity as ignorance is
never an excuse. Your only choice as several million citizen voters do
understand this legal argument? Let us appear in our own courtroom and
make our case. If I fail then it is no skin off of your back but it may cost me
my life. Whoever told you that you could condemn me to death w/o so
much as one appearance in person in a just venue NOT in FL, NY or PA?

123
 Or condemn any of us to death w/o any appearance in person? About
7,000 people read the documents I posted on Scribed and that is merely
one site. The last numbers I had were 5 million, that at least 5 million had
been informed and so had chosen me as their representative. How large
would that number be if all were informed? I am not to be faulted if every
man alive CAN’T understand the concept known as constitutional authority
as his own mother was injured. The fact Zoss is a man disqualifies him
from opining in this case at all as men have been harming women for ten
thousand years or more w/o any relief and men can never ever know
woman, pregnancy or birth as absolute fact. Zoss knew this yet still tried to
FORCE us to believe that he had given birth to a baby thus did know it as
fact or that he is smarter than I am only as he has a title. What? His
appointment makes him special or different, more able and capable than
I? He’s arguing a commission as a judge; I’m arguing a commission as
President. He’s arguing “judge” makes you better then woman no matter
who or what that woman is. If any judge in this nation were as smart as I
and as gifted as I when it comes to reasoning law? Their name would be
on the SCOTUS docket as both counsel and victim as federal judges have
been victimized by lawyers, by Bush V Gore and by the parties. Seriously:
As The Republic died so did your appointment even if you are the most
righteous, most just federal judge on Earth. The answer is not to rule that
women have zero power and zero authority over their own persons or over
federal judges and can never, ever act as Chief Justice and/or
Commander. The answer is to make an attempt to understand what even
James Madison could not:

Madison never understood constitutional authority as he advocated that a select

group of philosophers should run the nation. Jefferson tried to teach Madison but
couldn’t: If you are a living government of people then the citizens are the
scientists that conduct the experiment and evaluate the results and the citizens
are the philosophers that then produce the ideas that feed the government. The
People are the select group that should run the nation. Want and need quality
people? Start with yourself, as you aren’t above or outside The People; if the
nation needs a “constitutional physicist” and we never had one, no school
teaches it and there may be only one job in the whole world that requires it and
they want anybody but you so your prospects seem to be nonexistent?

124
Volunteer to become it; discover it; define it; do it. If you succeed? Then they
might have to consider you. You became the world’s first, one and only,
professional constitutional physicist and you did it by yourself so somebody
might reason and decide you should be invited to join a select group and run the
nation. Then you truly, actually are a member of a very, very select group: a
voter. Madison had no idea what made him special. We have voters; we’ve
always had voters. What we need is People who are willing to act; to abide by
the terms no matter what, as they understand all they are is a person with one
vote so they don’t know better but only different. We need people who play well
together not who are the same, voters abiding by the terms only as they want to
and so will. Abiding by the terms is their interest as that yields the greatest profit:
Quality people. Businessmen and lawyers do not play well together as they are
often in the same bed but scientists and philosophers check one another as
philosophers remind scientists while you can you sometimes shouldn’t and
scientists remind philosophers some ideas are great in theory only thus should
remain theories. We need to become a nation of scientists and philosophers, as
Jefferson would not recognize the modern political party or the country he
invented.

This court has all of the proof it needs: Barack Obama and Susan Herbert. Why
can’t Obama be made to appear and talk about himself and how he came to
believe what he says he truly believes thus prove he is natural born? I can do this
easily. You, the judge, do not get to decide as The People do. You don’t get to
judge us as The Constitution is. Since when does a President NOT answer to
The People? If this court wants other proof and other evidence it may examine all
I entered to the record. It may also read the SCOTUS docket. The Constitution
does not tell The People or me what we cannot do but it does tell this court what
it cannot do and thus far there is no constitutional basis for this court’s actions no
matter how they sound. Paul Zoss is guilty of attempted rape as that is what he
tried to do to me as rape is not about sex but about power and control. I say
attempted as I can keep Paul Zoss and any other man from getting what they
want from me forever, a feeling, which reasons why and how I made it so far: you
can try to rape me and you can try to murder me and you can even attack my
children but you’ll never, ever, ever get me to truly believe that I’m your victim. I’ll
shoot if I have to as you do not scare me nor does the named threat you make
against me: prison and/or death. I’m already in prison and I know death so what’s
to be afraid of?

125
 For good measure attached is another copy of the
SCOTUS docket and the private detective’s report on
Obama. All other paper evidence and proof is attached to
the other cases within this court that Zoss illegally and in
violation of the law dismissed. But again paper is never
absolute proof as people are the proof in a Constitutional
Republic.

If you’re not dead a dead institution, that is. Gonzales and her attorney had the
incorrect argument but I do not. It will be highly embarrassing for this nation and
this nation may never, ever recover if I make an appearance in world court
and/or in the Vatican court. For if that happens? Who knows, as I could become
the leader of a competing nation thus turn it around, into a just nation with a
Declaration and Constitution that they live out as reality. It, The People, could
then mop the floor with the US, the institution, upon an international level:
“Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit and intelligence of the
citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils,
because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded because
they flatter the people, in order to betray them.” Justice Joseph Story

THIS SEEMS TO BE LOST UPON ALL WHO READ THIS CASE:

IN ANY AND ALL CASES THAT ARE FILED WITHIN SCOTUS THE US MUST
RESPOND, AS THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT IS THE PEOPLE.
EVERY PETITION THAT IS FILED THUS DOCKETED RECEIVES AN ANSWER. IN AN
AUTHORITY CASE THE NAMED PARTIES MUST RESPOND BUT IN ANY CASE THE
US MUST RESPOND. IN MY CASE THE US DID NOT AND THEN NO NAMED PARTY
RESPONDED!

IN MY UNIQUE CASE THE US FAILED TO RESPOND AND WHEN I CAME BACK TO

ADDRESS THIS THEN NO PERSON ANSWERED THUS NO ANSWER EVER CAME
FROM ANYONE. THE SG MAY NOT ANSWER FOR EXACTLY NAMED PARTIES LIKE
OBAMA AND ROBERTS. THE SG CAN AND MAY IF THE CASE IS NOT AN
AUTHORITY CASE AS THE SG THEN WOULD BE SPEAKING FOR THE OFFICERS.

126
BUT EXACTLY NAMED PARTIES? NOT! THE SG MAY NOT ADDRESS DEFAULT
ANOTHER SG ENTERED BY MAGICALLY CLAIMING IT NEVER, EVER HAPPENED.
REMEMBER, SHE ONLY SITS AS THE DEFAULT CAME ON 11/05/08 THE DAY
AFTER THE ELECTION THAT MADE HER THE SG AND THAT SOUGHT TO
INVALIDATE THAT ELECTION AS IT IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE INVALIDATED UNTIL
ADDRESSED OR WE WILL DIE LIKE ROME; OUR EVENTUAL PHYSICAL
DESTRUCTION IS IN THE WORKS. THE SG HAS AN INSURMOUNTABLE CONFLICT
THEN AS WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO OVERCOME IT? SHE FAILED. SHE
HAD TO, BY LAW AND ALL PRECEDENT, ANSWER WHY OR DEFAULT AGAIN OR
ANSWER AND ADMIT THAT I, THUS THE PEOPLE, WON THE CASE. SHE MAY NOT
ENTER A BLANKET WAIVER THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO ANYONE BUT HER OWN
PERSON.

YOU CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC IF NOBODY ANSWERS YOUR

PETITION – IF YOU HAVE NO LIVING PEOPLE - AND THE CURRENTLY SITTING SG
CANNOT THEN RESPOND AS SHE DID AS SHE WOULD NOT EVEN BE SITTING IF A
RESPONSE CAME THE FIRST TIME. THE RESPONSE, DEFAULT, THEN APPLIES TO
THE CURRENT SG.

ONCE DEFAULT IS THEN IT IS. THE CURRENT SG MAY NOT RESPOND TO SUCH A
DEFAULT BY THEN DEFAULTING OVER AGAIN OR COMMITTING WHAT IS A
CRIME. IT’S LIKE THIS: ONCE I REASONED WHY WAIVING THE RIGHT AND
INTEREST WAS CRIMINAL AND THAT THE CASE CAPTION WAS CHANGED THEN
THE ORIGINAL SG FAILED TO RESPOND. THUS THEY REALIZED THEY NEVER
HAD THE POWER OR AUTHORITY TO DO THAT IN THIS CASE. SO THEN UNLESS
THE CASE WAS HEARD IN PERSON AND UNLESS IT WAS RULED THAT THE SG
MAY WAIVE THE US’ INTEREST AND RIGHT IN AN AUTHORITY CASE THEN ELENA
KAGAN CAN’T DO IT – SHE MAY NOT – AND AS I NAMED HER AND TOLD HER?
SHE THEN DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME MISTAKENLY BUT WITH DELIBERATION.
KAGAN IS ASSUMING SHE WILL NEVER BE MADE TO SUFFER THE
CONSEQUENCES. SHE WILL AND MAJOR CONSEQUENCES AS WHAT HAPPENS IF
THE US DOES THIS NOT MISTAKENLY BUT WITH DELIBERATION/

IT HAS JUST CONCEDED THAT ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY BELONGS TO THE
WORLD IN THE FORM OF THE WORLD COURT AS WHAT KAGAN DID IS CLAIM THE
SITTING OFFICERS HAVE NO INTEREST AND NO RIGHT ONLY SHE UNLIKE THE

127
FIRST SG DID IT WITH MOTIVATION AND INTENT: SHE IS AFRAID OF THE
REPERCUSSIONS OF ENFORCING THE LAW. SHE GAVE OUR SOVEREIGNTY
AWAY AS SHE WAS TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE SITTING OFFICERS AS I’M
ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE ONCE THE US FAILED TO RESPOND AT ALL.
THAT’S HOW I KNOW I’LL WIN IN WORLD COURT AND WIN IN SUCH A WAY YOU
MIGHT HAVE A BLOODBATH ON YOUR HANDS AS IT THEN DOES HAVE THE
POTENTIAL TO TURN INTO ANOTHER FRENCH REVOLUTION.

YOU WANT AND NEED TO ALLOW THE PEOPLE AN APPEARANCE IN PERSON

-WE’RE NOT ASKING AS IT IS OURS ALREADY – TO THEN PROTECT ANY SITTING
OFFICERS THAT DID NOT ACT TO INJURE US WITH DELIBERATION. IF YOU DON’T
THEN EVERY OFFICER IS SUBJECT TO REMOVAL NOM MATTER WHAT THEY DID
OR DID NOT DO.

HERE YOU GO AND IT IS PARTLY WHY I KEEP NAMING PAUL ZOSS:

YOU DO NOT NEED TO PROTECT THE OFFICERS AS THEY ARE NOT THE
VICTIMS. NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I ENCOUNTERED SO MANY UNJUST PERSONS,
JUDGES, ACTING WITH ALL OF THEIR MIGHT TO PROTECT THE PERPETRATORS
OVER THE VICTIMS. WHY? THE SAME REASON THE PARTIES AND PRIVATEERS
DO IT: AS JUDGES KNOW THEY HAD ZERO BUSINESS DOING SEVERAL THINGS
THEY DID UPON A ROUTINE BASIS LIKE PLAYING THOSE NASTY WORD GAMES
WITHIN RULINGS. IF YOU ARE INNOCENT? IF YOU DID IT BUT NEVER KNEW THE
HARM IT CAUSED? THEN YOU’D HAVE NO REASON TO FEAR THIS CASE. ONLY
THE GUILTY FEAR THIS CASE THUS MANUFACTURE MORE AND MORE LIES.

GUILTY PEOPLE ACT GUILTY. IN THE WORLD COURT LOCATED IN DC SO I CAN

AND WILL WIN THERE THUS IT IS OPEN SEASON ON ALL OF THE OFFICERS AS
WE ONLY CONTROL THIS IF IT REMAINS WITHIN A FEDERAL COURTHOUSE? ALL I
HAVE TO DO IS ENTER ALL OF THE FEDERAL RULINGS AS MY PROOF AS THEY
ARE LIKE SIGNED CONFESSIONS. THEY PROVE ONLY ME, THE PEOPLE WHO
ACKNOWLEDGED THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CORRECT APPLICATION OF THE
LAW UPON READING MY CASE AND 9 SCOTUS JUSTICE ARE INNOCENT.

128
NO MATTER HOW OR WHY IT HAPPENED, AS THE CLERKS CHANGED THE NAME
OF MY CASE OR AS I INFORMED THE SG, THE SITTING OFFICERS DEFAULTING
WAS A BLESSING - IF YOU TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT.

IN EFFECT THE CURRENT SG WAIVED THE US AUTHORITY THUS AWARDED IT

OT A COURT OUTSIDE THE US SUCH AS THE WORLD COURT. THUS ALL PEOPLE
WOULD THEN OBEY THAT COURT AND ENFORCE THOSE RULINGS. WHY? HOW?
EASY: THE US FINALLY HAD A CASE GO TO THE WORLD COURT, GONZALES OF
CASTLEROCK V GONZALES. HER ATTORNEY ARGUE HER CASE INCORRECTLY
IN SCOTUS AND IN WORLD COURT. ME? I’LL ARGUE IT CORRECTLY! THUS
AUTHORITY THEN WOULD BE THE WORLD COURT NOT SCOTUS AS IT IS THE
FEDERAL JUDICIARY STATING: WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF OBEYING THE
CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT, THE PEOPLE, WHILE THE WORLD
COURT WOULD BE SAYING AS THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERNMENT THEN WE
WILL OBEY THEM AS THEY ARE ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CONSTITUTION.

DO YOU REALIZE WHAT IT WOULD MEAN FOR THE WORLD TO ACKNOWLEDGE

MY AUTHORITY THUS THE PEOPLE’S AUTHORITY UPON DISCOVERING BVG IS A
TIE RATHER THAN THE US DEALING WITH IT ON THEIR OWN? IT WON’T BE
PRETTY AND THEN THE US LOSES OUT ON MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS
THEY WOULD NO LONGER OWN THE ADVANTAGE IF I GAVE IT TO THE WORLD
FIRST.

As for Paul Zoss: I said over and over that he can’t know something. I can know
it but he can’t. I did something only Jesus is so I can know it, as if I have
miraculous powers when I do not. I wasn’t born with it like Jesus so I had to act
to become it thus it often seems as if I possess ESP and the power of miracles
when really it is physics – law – and our two governing documents - law - state
it exactly so as I tested it I then can know what Zoss and all officers do not. As I
knew federal judges would be reduced to writing exact lies, “insufficient fact” and
“no arguable basis” as if women have been accorded legal power and moral
authority since day one or as if I am defective while he, a federal judge, is not?
As if to imply that as a federal judge he is smarter than I am (better than) and so
more able and capable so that the casual observer would accept his WRITTEN
word as fact and never investigate? I outfoxed him by pre-empting him:

129
The reason I’ll clean house in world court is that not only is the planet hot to
embarrass the US but that Jessica Gonzales had her day in federal court as she
was not forever pro se as she had a lawyer. A lawyer then took her case to the
world court and not as an authority case but regardless she made an appearance
in person in the federal court while I have not. That alone would cause me to win
but so would something else: Paul Zoss would have to have lived my entire life
with me thus be an eyewitness to history – he would have to have been at every
event ever that I was present for since born – and he was not. As he was not
there how can he know? He can’t and as he is acting as a federal judge while
Obama acts as president legal or not we all know A Summary View, The
Declaration, The Revolution, The Constitution, Marbury V Madison and Bush V
Gore happened. All Marbury V Madison is? The fact of Marbury’s life along with
the US’ life, or it’s fact is American history. It’s fact is the law of the US. BVG is
an authority case: I knew it so I knew the law and the law is changing the case
caption to two individuals then opened the door for every citizen who knew to
then sue to become the President as US law is the art of becoming. Take short
cuts like Obama and you never become the authority even if you sit. Take the
longest, hardest, most difficult road imaginable? Then you become the authority;
you wholly embody it and you own that knowledge as a part of your person.

Whenever Obama needed to he changed his spots; he’s been all things – one at
a time - to all people. Whenever a hand up helped him out then he took it. How
many favors got him where he is? Lots and lots. Nobody is shy about hiding this.
A phone call will get him into Harvard? Obama took it. Me? I said no thanks I’ll do
it on my own so now I’m blacker than Obama will ever be as I overcame what
those people still face and I even have an answer for the firefighters and others
who can’t seem to overcome the obstacle their selves. I molded myself in the
image of my creators as I not once thought of myself as being above the law and
then not even the rules as I did comply as much as humanly possible. And: I
could have gone to the world court long ago but waited as that is one of the worst
things we can do as a nation so it needs to be my last resort – after SCOTUS as
we have zero evidence the Justices ever saw my case and won’t until an other
federal court like this one enters us in person or after this court once again caves
to fear thus refuses us entry to our own court building that we paid for and now
pay to run. If this court rules ONLY lawyers, crooks and foreigners have the

130
vested right and vested interest to appear in person when I did what no other
American ever did? Then we go to world court, the worst-case scenario for the
officers but not for the People. I’ll be first to go there w/o any appearance in
person at all in the federal court, not after I exhausted the states and their
“highest” courts and not even after I won on paper! Thus: I was kept out only as I
am honest and only as I won.

So, you fault and punish me – injure me - as only I am intelligent enough to have
known and then am fearless enough to have acted? As I make you FEEL less
than or as you have an inferiority complex, as if you’re sexist? Or as you fear any
repercussions by the parties or privateers as they will not be happy their dirty
little secrets are exposed? I entered ALL of US history to the record and then all
of world history to the court record as I can and may as I am an American and
Americans made it possible for me to do this as what I entered was the Iroquois
confederacy which is over 800 years old plus a photograph of the Earth as taken
by men, American men, looking back at Earth from the moon thus I entered the
entire world or all humanity.

If you weren’t born here then you may not do this. You can try it but is it
admissible? Nope as your citizens did not make the lunar landing possible and
then you had to actually land on a body in space not the Earth. I told the
SCOTUS clerks:

Here as somebody is going to try to claim I did not enter a fact and we all know it
is not possible to enter every fact of humanity from day one in Eden and all I ever
had to enter was the fact of the US – US law - and my life not yours. That very
attachment was entered to this court so how can Zoss reasonably say insufficient
fact if I did enter it all, as even if you discount this then I still entered much more
than any licensed lawyer is asked to enter, and how does Zoss know I entered
insufficient fact if he never met me in person and so can’t know some fact?

Feelings and emotions are a fact of the person speaking. No lawyer can ever
know my feeling and emotion as fact. Only I can know it. Zoss? Even if he was
with me for every moment of my life did he and I have the same exact feeling and
emotion at the same time? Paul Zoss can never, ever know my feeling and

131
emotion as fact; he cannot testify that he had cause to claim “insufficient fact” as
to know that he then had to ask me!

Zoss never could deny that motion as SCOTUS granted it and in such a way it is
permanent – did not NY even come around to certifying me ‘forever pro se’
AFTER the SCOTUS action? YES thus the poor persons motion is forever as
NOTHING in our law says the acting, legal Chief Justice and/or President must
be a licensed lawyer so SUSAN HERBERT may act in her own defense and in
defense of The People if only one other person reviews all fact and law plus the
correct application and sides with her thus choosing her as their representative
and one did as I received one legal vote plus I then received the support of
others – in person – and then even millions over the internet.

Susan can know Zoss motivation and intent and she can know his feelings as to
become an authority case? Susan had to heal the injury Zoss still suffers from
thus as Susan is a constant then any and all people not acting according to the
letter of the law and/or its spirit will be easily detected and I warned Zoss but he
still went here. As I do not possess ESP how and why did I know to legally claim
in preparation for an appearance in world court that other federal judges would
try to cite insufficient fact? I did what any actual constitutional authority does:

I overcame all irrational fear. Fear as unconstitutional; even Jesus says those
who stand in the face of all fear will win. FEAR is what all humans base their
decisions upon and you may ask any expert as psychologists will tell you this. A
federal judge might act as he fears no consequence or he might act as he fears
all consequence. It matters not. FEAR is what was inserted into us as humans in
Eden as fear causes false guilt, shame over what is not our fault.

Even felt shame thus fear; Adam felt blame thus fear. Our emotional compass
became skewed as we violated universal economic truth: Avoid the apple and all
benefit as in avoid the office of executive and all benefit. If you hold the one thing
you want out as a reason not to attack it itself then all win. But once a person
decides to go after that one thing? We all lose. Eden was a safety issue, a safety
issue we lived out over in with the second fall, BVG. Only this time as I knew the
results of Even in Eden I took another bite as “free will” is a corruption as will is

132
never free as will is what people not animals have. It’s like “willpower” as there’s
no such thing! Will is moral authority not legal power. And physical force?

The original separation of powers in Eden is physical strength and childbirth. Men
must learn not to take whatever they want via physical force and women must
learn never to do whatever they are told to do via threat of physical force but to
reason and decide on their own. Federal judges? They must learn never to take
whatever they want via force as it is force if you do it without any reason but a
selfish reason. US law is about UNSELFISH or SELFLESS love not selfishness
that is why everybody is to be welcomed at the table.

That is why I will always and forever have the means to know what other people
cannot know and to defeat titles and money who are not the constitutionally set
government of the US as my motivations and intentions are pure: Unconditional
love for self and nation or Philadelphia, brotherly love.

Paul Zoss is a grown man with all the privileges and advantages he could ever
want or need. Nobody needs to worry about him as he can worry about himself.
He can take care of himself. I can ask him one question so then the people will
know his truth as fact and so Zoss must now decide: Are you Adam? Are you
going to blame me when asked? or are you finally going to admit to the truth that
Adam could not, that you did it because you could and because you wanted to do
it – for whatever reason – as nobody held a gun to your head and forced you to
do it. Or will Zoss make Adam’s mistake all over again? All Adam and Eve ever
had to do to escape punishment is: Tell the truth!

God said he unconditionally loved them but they did not believe it! They tested it
as you test any law, as you test any parent. He said he could forgive anything but
that if they ate the apple there were consequences and if they lied there were
consequences as once they ate that apple? IGNORANCE IS NOT AN EXCUSE!
Once you eat that apple, get that law license, than you are agreeing to play by
the court rules not by law to then gain entry to then argue law in person so Susan
does no need to meet those rules; for her entry should be automatic as she met
an even higher standard: The SCOTUS bar as she not only gained entry but won
thus no other federal judge may then deny her motions or her appearance in
person. Would Susan enter a frivolous or abusive motion? No, all she entered

133
was the poor person’s motion as a courtesy to the clerks as their rules often say
they may not file a case without it. It was never to be JUDGED by anyone as
Susan already proved herself to be the equal of a Founder, an original Founder.
Once you sit as a federal judge? You’re an expert; like Susan knows this you are
to know it. You have zero excuse expect: I was afraid. That’s the only actual
reason as nobody cares what you are afraid of only that you tell the truth.

The exactly named Creator told me a joke as I lived in Truth or Consequences,

New Mexico, as in tell the truth or else as some consequences are not within our
control, and way back in 1996 I knew I was to look in Hawaii, that somehow
someway Hawaii would become very, very important in my life as would a lie
about Hawaii or that maybe Hawaiians would lie about themselves as like New
Mexico they are often thought of as being less than or not a real state. I almost
went to college at the University of Hawaii, my mother has a connection to
Hawaii, and the Mormons are still in Hawaii while the lepers are not and there I
was in Truth or Consequences, NM, staring right at Hawaii when it should have
been impossible. The Creator was ‘pinging’ me; would I ping the Creator back?
You bet as “sincerity”, “honesty’ and “authenticity” are feelings and emotions so
when I feel the Creator or the universe as I have an exact feeling when I slam
into the truth headfirst? I ping it back; it’s how I came to own my bound copy of
the Constitution; it’s how several thousand facts all came to line up in my life. I
will bring the proof with me into court as can any other person claim they set out
to prove the exactly named Creator was reality in a court of law to then be able to
make the case for the equality of all humans and when they did they happened to
find out 12 years beforehand that a legal situation was brewing whereby the
office would come to be open to any and all takers and that person claiming to be
Hawaiian would masquerade among us and that due to Hawaii’s inferiority
complex its agents not its people would be more than happy to play along? That
even then, before it came to be, the Creator had Hawaii and all actual
Americans, especially those Natural born, in its hand and so safely delivered the
evidence and proof to the one person who could and would mount a defense on
her behalf and then on behalf of all people even Paul Zoss?

No, not one other person can make this claim and then prove it. I first began
making this case at age 5 when I exchanged one life for another, as I needed
proof that the Creator was real or I was going to die and I knew it. If awarded this

134
one life I swore to act in defense of humanity as I would always know God was
reality and as exchanging exact lives is not equal and exchanging my own for
theirs was pointless as what good is that if I am then dead so then can’t return
anything to God? Acting in defense of humanity was the biggest thing I could
think of as the moon is my sense of self as I was almost exactly 18 months old,
the age we acquire our sense of self, when that happened. I never, ever went
back on that promise once and I never will as today I know: I, Susan, entered a
contract with the Creator.

Who ever knew he listened and took us up on the offer? Exactly?

All of you should know as how else do you reason your own existence as a
nation of People? If you need me to prove the documents are elegant thus reveal
the elegant application of the law then I will but when I do?

You’ll know the truth – the Creator did choose us after we first chose ourselves
as the Hopi say – and so you’ll never have any excuse to violate the law again as
then you will forever know what I know – if you do you only harm yourself first
before harming any other person – as every American citizen is

Forever pro se and forever pro bono. No matter what the paper says.

135