Antennas 1

Antennas
Antennas
Transmitter
Transmitting
Antenna
Electromagnetic
Wave
Transmission Line
Receiver
Receiving
Antenna
Electromagnetic
Wave
Transmission Line
Antennas are transducers that transfer electromagnetic energy

between a transmission line and free space.
Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series
Antennas
Here are a few examples of common antennas:

Linear dipole fed
by a two-wire line
Linear monopole
fed by a single wire
over a ground plane
Ground plane
Coaxial ground
plane antenna
Linear elements connected

to outer conductor of the
coaxial cable simulate the
ground plane
Multiple loop antenna wound

around a ferrite core
Loop antenna
Uda-Yagi dipole array
Loop dipole
Parabolic (dish) antenna
Logperiodic array
Passive elements
Antennas
From a circuit point of view, a transmitting antenna behaves like an

equivalent impedance that dissipates the power transmitted
Transmitter
Transmitting
Antenna
Electromagnetic
Wave
Transmission Line
1
Transmitter
Zg
Vg
P( t ) =
2
2
Req I
Zeq = Req + jXeq
Transmission Line
The transmitter is equivalent to a generator.

Antennas
A receiving antenna behaves like a generator with an internal

impedance corresponding to the antenna equivalent impedance.
Receiver
Receiving
Antenna
Electromagnetic
Wave
Transmission Line
1
I
ZR
Zeq
Zin
Transmission Line
P( t ) =
2
2
Rin I
Veq
The receiver represents the load impedance that dissipates the time
average power generated by the receiving antenna.
Antennas
Antennas are in general reciprocal devices, which can be used both

as transmitting and as receiving elements. This is how the
antennas on cellular phones and walkietalkies operate.
The basic principle of operation of an antenna is easily understood
starting from a twowire transmission line, terminated by an open
circuit.
|I|
Zg
ZR
Vg
Open circuit
|I|
Note: This is the return

current on the second wire,
not the reflected current
already included in the
standing wave pattern.
Antennas
Imagine to bend the end of the transmission line, forming a dipole

antenna. Because of the change in geometry, there is now an
abrupt change in the characteristic impedance at the transition
point, where the current is still continuous. The dipole leaks
electromagnetic energy into the surrounding space, therefore it
reflects less power than the original open circuit the standing
wave pattern on the transmission line is modified
| I0 |
Zg
|I|
Vg
Z0
|I|
| I0 |
Antennas
In the space surrounding the dipole we have an electric field. At

zero frequency (d.c. bias), fixed electrostatic field lines connect the
metal elements of the antenna, with circular symmetry.
Antennas
At higher frequency, the current oscillates in the wires and the field
emanating from the dipole changes periodically. The field lines
propagate away from the dipole and form closed loops.
Antennas
In general, these wave equations are difficult to solve, because of

The
electromagnetic
fieldwith
emitted
by an
antenna
Maxwells
the presence
of the terms
current
and
charge.obeys
It is easier
to
equations
use the magnetic vector potential and the electric scalar potential.
E = j H
The definition of the magnetic vector potential is
H = J + j E
B=A
Under the assumption of uniform isotropic medium we have the

wave equation:
Note that since the divergence of the curl of a vector is equal to
satisfy
Ethe=zero
j
H
= j J +
zero we always
divergence
condition
E2
H = J + j E
B = ( A) = 0
= J + 2 H
We have also
Note that in the regions with electrical charges
E = j H = j A ( E + j A ) = 0
E = E E2= ( ) E 2
109
Antennas
We define the scalar potential first noticing that
( ) = 0
and then choosing (with sign convention as in electrostatics)
( E + j A) = ( ) E = j A
Note that the magnetic vector potential is not uniquely defined,
since for any arbitrary scalar field
B = A = ( A + )
In order to uniquely define the magnetic vector potential, the
standard approach is to use the Lorenz gauge
A + j = 0
11
Antennas
From Maxwells equations
H=
B = J + j E
B = J + j E
( A) = J + j ( j A )
From vector calculus
( ) = ( ) 2
2 A j
( A) = ( A) 2 A = J +
Lorenz Gauge
A = j
( A) = j
12
Antennas
Finally, the wave equation for the magnetic vector potential is
2A + 2 A = A + 2 A = 2 J
For the electric field we have
D = E = ( j A ) =
22 + j A = + j ( j ) =
The wave equation for the electric scalar potential is
2
2
+ = + =
13
Antennas
The wave equations are inhomogenoeous Helmholtz equations,

which apply to regions where currents and charges are not zero.
We use the following system of coordinates for an antenna body
J( r ')
( r ')
Observation point
r r'
dV '
r'
y
x
Radiating antenna body
14
Antennas
The generals solutions for the wave equations are
j r r '
J ( r ') e
dV '
A( r ) =
V
(
j r r '
( r ') e
4r 1r'
r) = V
r r'
dV '
The integrals are extended to all points over the antenna body
where the sources (current density, charge) are not zero. The effect
of each volume element of the antenna is to radiate a radial wave
j r r '
r r'
15
Antennas
Infinitesimal Antenna
Observation point
J(0)
(0)
r = r r'
S
r' = 0
dV '
x
Infinitesimal antenna body
I = constant
phasor
z <<
Dielectric medium ( , )
16
Antennas
The current flowing in the infinitesimal antenna is assumed to be

constant and oriented along the zaxis
I = S J ( r ') = S J ( 0 )
V ' = S z
V 'J ( r ') = I z iz
The solution of the wave equation for the magnetic vector potential
simply becomes the evaluation of the integrand at the origin
I ze
A=
4 r
1
H= A
j r
iz
E= 1 H
17
Antennas
There is still a major mathematical step left. The curl operations

must be expressed in terms of spherical coordinates
ir
i
r
Polar angle
Azimuthal angle
y
i
18
Antennas
In spherical coordinates
ir
1
A= 2
r sin r
Ar
1
=sin A
r i
r sin i
rA
r sin A
(
(1
A ) i r
1
r sin
+ ( Ar ) r A i
r sin r
1
+ ( r A ) ( Ar ) i
r r
19
Antennas
We had
I ze
j r
A=
iz
with
i z = i r cos i sin
4 r
j I ze
A = i
4 r
j r
1
1 + j r sin
For the fields we have
1 j I z e
H = A = i
4 r
j r
1
1 + j r sin
20
Antennas
j r
1 j I z e
E=H=
j 4 r
11
2 cos +
ir
j r ( j r ) 2
11
+ sin 1 ++ i
j r ( j r ) 2
The general field expressions can be simplified for
observation
point at large distance from the infinitesimal antenna
1 >>
1
j r
>>
1
2
( j r )
r=
r >> 1
21
Antennas
At large distance we have the expressions for the Far Field
j r
j I z e
H i
4 r
E i
sin
2 r >>
j I z e
4 r
j r
sin
At sufficient distance from the antenna, the radiated fields are

perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation.
The magnetic field and electric field are in phase and
E =H = H
These are also properties of uniform plane waves.

22
Antennas
However, there are significant differences with respect to a uniform

plane wave:
The surfaces of constant phase are spherical instead of planar,
and the wave travels in the radial direction.
The intensities of the fields are inversely proportional to the
distance, therefore the field intensities decay while they are
constant for a uniform plane wave.
The field intensities are not constant on a given surface of
constant phase. The intensity depends on the sine of the polar
angle .
The radiated power density is
11
*
EIH =zi rH
P( t ) = Re
2
22
= ir sin
2 4 r
23
Antennas
P( t )
H
The spherical wave resembles a plane wave locally in a small

neighborhood of the point ( r, , ).
24
Antennas
Radiation Patterns
Electric Field and Magnetic Field
E or H
Fixed r
Plane containing the antenna
proportional to sin
Plane perpendicular to the antenna
omnidirectional or isotropic
25
Antennas
Timeaverage Power Flow (Poynting Vector)
P( t )
z
Fixed r
Plane containing the antenna
proportional to sin2
Plane perpendicular to the antenna
omnidirectional or isotropic
26
Antennas
Total Radiated Power

The timeaverage power flow is not uniform on the spherical wave
front. In order to obtain the total power radiated by the infinitesimal
antenna, it is necessary to integrate over the sphere
Ptot =d
0 d r
0
= 2
I z
sin P (t )
2 3
= 2 r 0 d sin
2 4 r
=4 3
4 I z
=
3 4
Note: the total radiated power is independent of distance. Although

the power density decreases with distance, the integral of the
power over concentric spherical wave fronts remains constant.
27
Antennas
Ptot1 = Ptot 2
Ptot 2
Ptot1
28
Antennas
The total radiated power is also the power delivered by the

transmission line to the real part of the equivalent impedance seen
at the input of the antenna
2 2 I z 1 2
2 z 2 1 24
Ptot = I Req == I
4 223
3
The equivalent resistance of the

antenna is usually called radiation
resistance. In free space
o2 z
= o == 120 [ ] Req = 80
o
Req
[ ]
29
Antennas
The total radiated power is also used to define the average power
density emitted by the antenna. The average power density
corresponds to the radiation of a hypothetical omnidirectional
(isotropic) antenna, which is used as a reference to understand the
directive properties of any antenna.
Power radiation pattern of an
omnidirectional average antenna
Power radiation pattern

of the actual antenna
x
Pave
P( t, )
30
Antennas
The timeaverage power density is given by
Pave =
Total Radiated Power
Surface of wave front
Ptot I z2 1
===
( I z)
2 122
The directive gain of the infinitesimal antenna is defined as
3 4 r
2 1
4 r4 r
2I z I z
P( t , r, )
D( , ) =
2
Pave
= sin 3 4 r 2 4 r
32
= sin
2
31
Antennas
The maximum value of the directive gain is called directivity of the

antenna. For the infinitesimal antenna, the maximum of the
directive gain occurs when the polar angle is 90
3 2
= 1.5
Directivity = max { D( , )} = sin
The directivity gives a measure of how the
actual antenna performs
22
in the direction of maximum radiation, with respect to the ideal
isotropic antenna which emits the average power in all directions.
Pave
max
90
32
Antennas
The infinitesimal antenna is a suitable model to study the behavior

of the elementary radiating element called Hertzian dipole.
Consider two small charge reservoirs, separated by a distance z,
which exchange mobile charge in the form of an oscillatory curent
I( t)
33
Antennas
The Hertzian dipole can be used as an elementary model for many

natural charge oscillation phenomena. The radiated fields can be
described by using the results of the infinitesimal antenna.
Assuming a sinusoidally varying charge flow between the
reservoirs, the oscillating current is
I( t)
current flowing
out of reservoir
dd
= q( t) = qo cos( t)
charge on
dtdt
reference reservoir
I o = j qo
phasor
Radiation
pattern
Io
qo
34
Antennas
A short wire antenna has a triangular current distribution, since the

current itself has to reach a null at the end the wires. The current
can be made approximately uniform by adding capacitor plates.
Imax
z
Io
Io
The small capacitor plate antenna is equivalent to a Hertzian dipole
and the radiated fields can also be described by using the results of
the infinitesimal antenna. The short wire antenna can be described
by the same results, if one uses an average current value giving the
same integral of the current
Io = Imax 2
35
Antennas
Example A Hertzian dipole is 1.0 mm long and it operates at the

frequency of 1.0 GHz, with feeding current Io = 1.0 Ampres. Find
the total radiated power.
= c f 3 10 108= 0.39 m = 300 mm

z = 1 mm Hertzian dipole
2
4 2 Io z
1
2 23 2
=120 () ( 1 10 )Ptot =
3= 4.39
4mW
12
0.3
Io
For a short dipole with triangular current distribution and maximum

current Imax = 1.0 Ampre
Io = Imax 2
Ptot = 4.39 / 4 1.09 mW
36
Antennas
Timedependent fields - Consider the farfield approximation
H ( t ) = Re H e
j tj
I z sin j ( t r )
e
i Re
4 r
I z sin
i Re jcos( t r )+ j sin( t r )
4 r
E ( t ) =Re E e j t
I z sin
isin(
zt sin
r )
I
r tr)
i 4sin(
4 r
37
Antennas
Linear Antennas
Consider a dipole with wires of length comparable to the
wavelength.
L2
'
z
z'
r'
i '
r
L1
38
Antennas
Because of its length, the current flowing in the antenna wire is a

function of the coordinate z. To evaluate the farfield at an
observation point, we divide the antenna into segments which can
be considered as elementary infinitesimal antennas.
The electric field radiated by each element , in the farfield
approximation, is
E' = i
j I z e
4 r '
j r '
sin '
In farfield conditions we can use these additional approximations
'
r ' r z 'cos
39
Antennas
The lines r and r are nearly parallel under these assumptions.
r'
L2
'
z
z'
z 'cos
This length is neglected if
r ' r z 'cos
40
Antennas
The electric field contributions due to each infinitesimal segment

becomes
you cannot
neglect here
j r
e
j I z e
4 r 4 z 'cos
E' = i
j z 'cos
sin
you can
neglect here
The total fields are obtained by integration of all the contributions
E = i
j e
4 r
j e
H = i
4 r
j r
j r
L2j z cos
dzsin I( z) e
L1
L2j z cos
dzsin I( z) e
L1
41
Antennas
Short Dipole
Consider a short symmetric dipole comprising two wires, each of
length L << . Assume a triangular distribution of the phasor
current on the wires
Imax ( 1 z L )
I( z) =
Imax ( 1 + z L )
z0
z<0
The integral in the field expressions becomes
LL2L
j z cos
I( z) eI( z) dz =dz
since
max
LL
z = L =
j z cos
1
I2max
L
1 for a short dipole
42
Antennas
The final expression for farfields of the short dipole are similar to
the expressions for the Hertzian dipole where the average of the
triangular current distribution is used
z
E = i
= i
j r
j e
Imax
sin 2 L
j r
4j r2
Imax L e
4 r
j Imax L e
H = i
4 r
average
current
sin
j r
sin
43
Antennas
Halfwavelength dipole
Consider a symmetric linear antenna with total length /2 and
assume a current phasor distribution on the wires which is
approximately sinusoidal
I( z) = Imax cos( z)
The integral in the field expressions is
cos
2 Imax
Imax cos ( z) e j z cos dz =cos
2
sin
44
Antennas
We obtain the farfield expressions
E = i
je
H = i
2 r
je j r Imax
cos
2 r
j r
cos
2 sin
Imax
cos
cos
2 sin
and the timeaverage Poynting vector
P( t ) = i r
2
2 cos
Imax
cos
2 22
2 8 r sin
45
Antennas
The total radiated power is obtained after integration of the

timeaverage Poynting vector
1 2 1 cos ( u)
0 u du 4
12
Ptot = Imax
2
2.4376
12
= Imax 0.193978
Req
2
The integral above cannot be solved analytically, but the value is
found numerically or from published tables.The equivalent
resistance of the halfwave dipole antenna in air is then
Req ( 2) = 0.193978 73.07
46
Antennas
The direction of maximum radiation strength is obtained again for

polar angle =90 ande we obtain the directivity
8 r
P( t, r, 90)
= 1.641D=
2
Imax
22
1
Ptot 4 r
2
2.4376
The directivity of the halfwavelength
dipole is marginally better
I
max
than the directivity for a Hertzian dipole (D = 1.5).
2 2
The real improvement is in the much larger radiation resistance,

r characteristic impedance of typical
which is now comparable 8tothe
transmission line.
47
Antennas
From the linear antenna applet

Radiation Pattern for E and H
Power Radiation Pattern
48
Antennas
For short dipoles of length 0.0005 to 0.05

49
Antennas
50
Antennas
51
Antennas
For general symmetric linear antennas with two wires of length L, it

is convenient to express the current distribution on the wires as
I ( z) = Imax sin { ( L z )
The integral in the field expressions is now
Imax sin ( L z ) ej z cos dz =
2 Imax
sin
{ cos ( L cos ) cos ( L)

}
52
Antennas
The field expressions become
E = i
= i
j e
4 r
j r
j Imax e
2 r sin
L2j z cos
sin I( z) edz
j r
L1

}
j r
j e
L2j z cos
H = i
sin I( z) edz
4 r
L1
j r
j Imax e
= i
}
2 r sin
53
Antennas
Examples of long wire antennas

54
Antennas
55
Antennas
56
Antennas
57
Antennas
58
Antennas
59
Antennas
60
Antennas
61
Antennas


62
63

Antennas 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Antennas 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Antennas

Antennas are transducers that transfer electromagnetic energy

Here are a few examples of common antennas:

Linear elements connected

Multiple loop antenna wound

Parabolic (dish) antenna

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

From a circuit point of view, a transmitting antenna behaves like an

Zeq = Req + jXeq

The transmitter is equivalent to a generator.

A receiving antenna behaves like a generator with an internal

Antennas are in general reciprocal devices, which can be used both

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Note: This is the return

Imagine to bend the end of the transmission line, forming a dipole

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

In the space surrounding the dipole we have an electric field. At

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

In general, these wave equations are difficult to solve, because of

The definition of the magnetic vector potential is

Under the assumption of uniform isotropic medium we have the

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

We define the scalar potential first noticing that

From Maxwells equations

Finally, the wave equation for the magnetic vector potential is

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

The wave equations are inhomogenoeous Helmholtz equations,

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Radiating antenna body

The generals solutions for the wave equations are

Infinitesimal antenna body

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

The current flowing in the infinitesimal antenna is assumed to be

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

There is still a major mathematical step left. The curl operations

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

For the fields we have

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

At large distance we have the expressions for the Far Field

At sufficient distance from the antenna, the radiated fields are

These are also properties of uniform plane waves.

However, there are significant differences with respect to a uniform

The spherical wave resembles a plane wave locally in a small

Plane containing the antenna

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Plane perpendicular to the antenna

Timeaverage Power Flow (Poynting Vector)

Plane containing the antenna

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Plane perpendicular to the antenna

Total Radiated Power

Note: the total radiated power is independent of distance. Although

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

The total radiated power is also the power delivered by the

The equivalent resistance of the

Power radiation pattern

Amanogawa, 2006 Digital Maestro Series

The timeaverage power density is given by

Total Radiated Power

Surface of wave front

The directive gain of the infinitesimal antenna is defined as