Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ford Foundation
Foundation to Promote Open Society
The Pew Charitable Trusts
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Sunlight Foundation
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 1 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Judicial Races
Who Gives to State Candidates?
Financing State Political Parties
Who Gives to the Political Parties?
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 2 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
More than 15,000 candidates who sought offices ranging from the state legislature to the governor's seat raised
nearly $1.5 billion during state elections held in 2007 and 2008. State office-holders who were not up for
election raised an additional $172 million.
The $1.6 billion raised by candidates and office-holders during the 2007–2008 election cycle was slightly more
than the $1.4 billion raised during the comparable 2003–2004 elections.
In addition to the above $1.6 billion, committees organized around ballot measures raised $869 million, state
political parties raised nearly $370 million, and state legislative caucuses raised $178 million.
A review of the $3 billion raised in state campaigns during the 2007–2008 elections shows that:
Office-holders attracted most of the cash. Winners attracted two-thirds of the money raised by those
running for election. Incumbents seeking re-election collected about half of the money.
Money and incumbency remained nearly unbeatable. Incumbent legislators who had larger war
chests than their challengers were nearly unbeatable—94 percent won their re-election campaigns.
Supreme Court campaigns stayed the course. Candidates running for a seat on their states' highest
court raised $43.5 million, comparable to what they raised in 2000 and 2004 (each about $46 million).
Partisan races, in which candidates identify with a political party during the election, attracted 71
percent of the money raised in high court races.
Democrats and Republicans were evenly-matched. Although Democrats fielded more candidates—
7,226 compared to Republicans' 6,301; they raised comparable amounts on average: $103,439 by
Democrats and $106,083 by Republicans.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 3 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
Ballot measures continued to amass millions. 210 measures were on the ballots in 2007 and 2008.
Together, these measures attracted $869 million, up dramatically from $648 million raised in 2005–
2006, when voters in 40 states faced 244 measures on the ballots. Measures related to gambling drew
the most attention in 2008, with high-rolling donors pouring $273 million into 12 measures in nine
states. Same-sex marriage measures came in a distant second, generating $120 million in three states.
Ballot measures were not grassroots campaigns. While ballot measures are widely regarded as a
means for direct citizen participation in lawmaking, individuals provided just 18 percent of the money
raised around measures. Instead, businesses and special interests were the primary financiers,
contributing more than two-thirds of the money.
Those not up for election still raised millions. Incumbent legislators and office-holders raised $172
million, most for future campaigns. Incumbents in California, Illinois and Texas received nearly half of
the money raised by these incumbents not up for election.
State political parties were a huge vehicle for campaign cash. The 100 Democratic and Republican
state political parties increased their campaign coffers by 25 percent from their 2003–2004 levels,
raising nearly $370 million compared to $297 million they raised in 2003–2004. Funds from political
parties are especially important funding mechanisms in the states that limit how much candidates can
raise—but do not limit money flowing to and from the parties.
1. Defined as when the top-funded candidate raised at least twice what the other candidates(s) raised.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 4 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGNS
Since most states do not hold gubernatorial races during presidential election years, campaigns for legislative
office dominated the fundraising—attracting two-thirds of the money raised by candidates running for state
office in 2007–2008.
During the 2007–2008 elections, more than 6,400 state legislative seats were up for election across the country.
Nearly 14,000 candidates raised more than $1 billion while vying for those seats.
The 2,846 candidates who ran for 1,292 state senate seats raised $390 million, an average of $137,015 per
candidate. The 11,081 candidates who ran for 5,114 house/assembly seats raised $660 million, an average of
$59,545.
The median raised by general-election senate candidates was $55,501, more than double the $20,540 median
raised by those running for the state House/Assembly.
Democratic and Republican candidates raised comparable amounts on average: 5,421 Democrats raised $506.8
million; 4,812 Republicans raised $451.5 million.
Nationwide, 67 percent of the general-election senate races and 64 percent of house races were contested.
However, of those contested races, 68 percent of the senate seats and 66 percent of the house seats were not
monetarily competitive; in other words, the top-funded candidate raised more than twice what the other
candidate(s) raised (For more information on how the Institute determines monetary competitiveness, click
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 5 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
candidate(s) raised (For more information on how the Institute determines monetary competitiveness, click
here).
Eighty percent of the candidates who were uncontested in the general election were uncontested during the
primary elections as well.
Overall, just one-fourth (1,571) of all legislative races had contested primary elections. Most of those contests
(1,212) were house primaries. Michigan and Mississippi had the most contested primaries—each with 71—and
South Carolina was not too far behind with 67 contested primaries. The 2,568 candidates who were eliminated
in these primaries raised an average of $30,308, a median of $5,776.
The average cost of legislative races varied greatly among the states. California's general-election assembly
races averaged $888,491, while New Hampshire's house races averaged $4,472. A comparable disparity
between the two states was seen in 2003–2004 elections, as well.
Senate races are typically more expensive than house races. However, three states bucked that rule in 2007–
2008. In Oregon, the average senate race cost $171,996, while the average house race was $265,460. And in
Indiana, the average race for the Senate cost $139,215, while the average house race cost $166,549. In Arizona,
where legislative candidates receive public funding, the average general-election senate race was $84,994, while
the average house race was almost double at $156,905. That disparity can be explained in part by the public
funds received: house candidates received, on average, $115,147 of public funds, which is 73 percent of the cost
of the average house race. Senate candidates garnered 55 percent of their funds from public funding.
Winners raked in $743 million, 71 percent of all the money raised by legislative candidates. Those who lost in
the general election raised just $222 million, while those who lost in the primary raised $78 million.
Incumbents who sought re-election raised 77 percent of the money raised in their races. On average,
incumbents raised $109,818, while their challengers averaged just $32,155.
Given the power of incumbency and their significantly heftier campaign coffers, legislative incumbents were
nearly unbeatable—95 percent won their re-election campaigns.
Just one-fifth of the legislative races were open, where the incumbent did
not seek re-election. In these races, those who raised the most money Legislative incumbents
enjoyed a 76 percent success rate. were nearly unbeatable
—95 percent were re-
TABLE 3: COST OF GENERAL-ELECTION
LEGISLATIVE RACES, 2007–2008* elected
SENATE HOUSE
STATE SENATE TOTAL AVERAGE HOUSE TOTAL AVERAGE
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 6 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 7 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
Twenty California state senators together amassed $9.9 million during their off-election year, followed closely
by 16 Texas senators who raised $8 million. 184 legislators in Maryland raised $9.4 million.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 8 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
Just 14 states held gubernatorial races in 2007 and 2008, typical of a presidential election year. The candidates
raised $241 million, which is 12 percent more than the $215 million raised in the comparable 2003–2004
elections.2 Incumbent governors and lieutenant governors not up for election raised an additional $69.8 million.
North Carolina and Louisiana held the two most expensive races. The open race in North Carolina, which
garnered $41 million, cost more than twice the $18.7 million in 2004. However, it was $9 million less than the
cost of the open race in 2000, which garnered $32 million.
PERCENT
LT. GOVERNOR CHANGE
STATE GOVERNOR RACE RACE TOTAL FROM 2004
Gubernatorial races were monetarily competitiveduring the general election in just four of the 14 states:
Kentucky's then-incumbent Gov. Ernie Fletcher was defeated by Democratic challenger Steven
Beshear. Fletcher raised $7.6 million, 31 percent less than the $11 million raised by Beshear.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 9 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
The 2007 open Louisiana race saw three candidates raising large sums. Republican Gov. Jindal, who
won handily, raised $13.7 million, followed closely by $12.6 million raised by John Georges, who came
in a distant third, and Walter Boasso, who raised $7 million.
Missouri's open race was the least monetarily competitive. Jay Nixon, who won with 58 percent of the
vote, raised $15 million. By comparison, his Republican opponent, Kenny Hulshof, raised $8.5 million
and received just 39 percent of the vote.
The 2008 re-match between Gregoire and Rossi in Washington was once again highly competitive.
Rossi, who very narrowly lost to Christine Gregoire in 2004, raised $11.5 million, while Gregoire raised
$11.8 million. Gov. Gregoire fended off Rossi's challenge, garnering 53 percent of the vote.
Incumbent governors sought re-election in eight of the 10 races that were not monetarily competitive. In the
other races, incumbents from a different office were running to fill the open seats.
The size of a candidate's war chest also played a key role in determining who went on to become governor. The
winners of all 14 contests had one thing in common: more money than any of their opponents.
In the four states with open races (where the incumbent governor did not seek re-election)—Delaware,
Louisiana, Missouri and North Carolina—all four winners raised more money than their competitors.
As with the governor's race, North Carolina's lieutenant governor's race was the most expensive, attracting just
over $9 million. However, the winner of that race, Democrat Walter Dalton, who was riding on the coattails of
his running mate, Bev Perdue, raised just $2.5 million, less than half the $5.5 million raised by his Republican
opponent, Robert Pittenger.
primary election.
In distant second was Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who raised $10 million. That money can go toward his 2010 re-
election campaign.
Twenty sitting lieutenant governors raised $14.5 million. Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst topped the list with
$4.6 million, followed closely by Massachusetts Lt. Gov. Tim Murray.
2. The 2004 total used here excludes the $31 million raised during the special California gubernatorial recall election held in 2004.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 11 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
JUDICIAL RACES
In 2007 and 2008, 69 high court seats were up for election in 33 states, and 191 appellate seats were up for
election in 30 states.
Nearly $62 million was raised by judicial candidates: $43.5 million in high court races and $18 million raised in
appellate races.
Partisan races, in which candidates identify with a political party during the election, attracted most of the
money—71 percent of all the money raised by high court candidates and 82 percent of the money raised in
appellate races. Nonpartisan races, in which candidates are not listed on the ballot with a party affiliation,
accounted for 28 percent of the money raised in high court races and 17 percent of the money raised in all
appellate races. Retention elections—in which the current judge is placed on the ballot and voters choose
whether the judge remains in office—attracted very little money.
Nearly one-half (48 percent) of the money raised by judicial candidates came from two sources: lawyers and
lobbyists, and the candidates themselves. Lawyers, lobbyists and their firms gave more than $18 million, which
was 29 percent of the money raised by all judicial candidates. Candidates gave $11.6 million of their own
money, or 19 percent of the money raised.
The Institute also examined the money raised by high-court and appellate
candidates in 2007–2008 to determine if a correlation existed between Lawyers, lobbyists, and
state-level judicial candidates' electoral success, their ability to raise their firms gave more
money, and their ethnicity, race or gender. The report, Diversity in than $18 million to
State Judicial Campaigns, 2007–2008, found that women and
members of ethnic or racial minorities were underrepresented on the
judicial candidates
ballot. But once on the ballot, the advantage of incumbency and the ability
to raise money played key roles in the success of a campaign, regardless of a candidate's gender or ethnicity.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 12 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 13 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
The Institute classifies contributors according to their economic interests, relying on the occupation and/or
employer information of the donors as provided by the reports, and performing additional research as needed.
Using this information, the Institute is able to analyze giving by economic sectors across state lines to discover
patterns of giving. The following table shows contributions by economic sector to all candidates running for
state-level offices in 2007–2008 elections.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 14 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
Political parties provide another important vehicle for raising money for state candidates. This is especially true
in those states that limit how much donors can give to candidates, but do not limit state political parties.
During the 2007–2008 elections, 100 Democratic and Republican state party committees raised nearly $370
million. An additional $178 million was raised by 141 legislative caucuses.3
Nationally, the 100 state political parties raised $73 million more in 2007–2008 than they raised in 2003–2004,
a 25 percent increase. The increase was due in large part to the money raised in three states: the state parties in
California and Florida raised $16 million more in 2008 than they raised in 2004, while in Ohio, an additional
$14.5 million more than had been raised in 2004. Together, the party committees in these three states accounted
for nearly two-thirds of the $72 million increase from 2004 to 2008.
Democratic state party committees raised nearly $200 million, which is 16 percent more than the $170 million
raised by the 50 Republican state committees. The state party committees in California and Florida once again
were the top two money-raisers, as they have been since 2000.4
State political parties in half the states raised less than they did in 2004. Parties in the other 25 states raised
more than in 2004. Party committees in South Carolina, Montana, Virginia and Mississippi experienced the
greatest increase over their 2004 levels.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 15 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 16 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
Businesses and special interests, which gave a collective total of $127 million, were the next-largest source of
funds, providing 34 percent of the money raised by state political parties. Individual donors, on the other hand,
provided just 19 percent of the money raised.
Donors from three of the six top industries showed a significant preference for Democratic parties. The public
sector and general trade unions together gave $26.5 million more to Democratic state parties, and lawyers and
lobbyists gave $8 million more.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 17 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
Favoring Republican party committees were donors from real estate, gambling and casinos interests —together,
they gave nearly $11 million more to Republican state parties.
3. Given the changing nature of legislative caucuses over time, it is not feasible to make a cycle-to-cycle comparison of the money
these legislative caucuses raised. Therefore the analysis in this report focuses on the money raised by the 100 Democratic and
Republican state political parties in the 50 states.
4. The Institute began collecting party committee reports in all 50 states beginning in 2000.
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 18 of 19
An Overview of State Campaigns, 2007-2008 4/7/10 12:57 PM
In 2008, voters in 36 states faced 172 ballot measures that covered a broad spectrum of issues, from property
taxes and school funding to hot-button issues around same-sex marriage and abortion.
California measures attracted far and away the most money, at $471.6 million. Second-ranked Ohio trailed with
$86.5 million. Colorado measures brought in $73 million. A dozen states saw no money raised around their
ballot measures at all.
Seventy-two percent of ballot measure contributions came from donors within the state deciding the question.
For a detailed look at the money raised around 2008 ballot measures, see the Institute's report, 2008 Ballot
Measure Overview.
For a detailed look at the money raised around the 12 high-profile measures in 2007, see the Institute's report,
2007 Ballot Measures: Overview of 12 High-Profile Measures.
—END—
http://www.followthemoney.org/press/PrintReportView.phtml?r=420 Page 19 of 19