Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wignall, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which James Wignall appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. It also denied Wignall's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Wignall's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-08-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6061

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which James Wignall appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. It also denied Wignall's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Wignall's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Wignall, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which James Wignall appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. It also denied Wignall's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Wignall's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6061

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    JAMES WIGNALL,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap.
    James P. Jones, Chief
    District Judge. (2:04-cr-10064-jpj-pms)

    Submitted:

    August 7, 2009

    Decided:

    August 25, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Wignall, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James

    Wignall

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying Wignalls motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18


    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    United States v. Wignall, No.

    stated by the district court.


    2:04-cr-10064-jpj-pms

    (W.D.

    Va.

    Dec.

    22,

    2008).

    Wignalls motion for appointment of counsel.


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We

    deny

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like