Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McNamara v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Patrick McNamara appealed a district court order dismissing his complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia's Division of Child Support Enforcement. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied McNamara's motion for default judgment and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-06-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-2356

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Patrick McNamara appealed a district court order dismissing his complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia's Division of Child Support Enforcement. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied McNamara's motion for default judgment and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    McNamara v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Patrick McNamara appealed a district court order dismissing his complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia's Division of Child Support Enforcement. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied McNamara's motion for default judgment and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-2356

    PATRICK JAMES MCNAMARA,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COMMONWEALTH
    Enforcement,

    OF

    VIRGINIA,

    Division

    of

    Child

    Support

    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:10-cv-00782-HEH)

    Submitted:

    May 24, 2011

    Decided:

    June 7, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Patrick James McNamara, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Patrick

    James

    McNamara

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)


    (2006).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    McNamara v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:10-cv-

    00782-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 2010).

    We deny the motion for

    default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like