Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Online ISSN-2347-7563
Chi-square tests
No of respondent
78
22
100
Percentage
78
22
100
Among the respondents who registered their views in the study, 78 % were male respondents and 22 %
were Female.
Marital Status Wise Distribution of the Respondents
Table showing the marital status wise distribution of the respondents
Table 2.
Marital Status
Married
Unmarried
Total
No of respondent
67
33
100
Percentage
67
33
100
No of respondent
23
41
24
12
100
Percentage
23
41
24
12
100
The table reveals that that 41% of the respondents are under graduate and 24% of the respondents are
post-graduate and 23 % of the respondents are up to school level and 12% of the respondents are
professionals.
Occupational Status Wise Distribution of the Respondents
Table showing Occupational status wise distribution of the respondents
Table 4.
Occupation Status
Employee
Business
Professional
Agriculture & others
Total
No of respondent
34
37
14
15
100
Percentage
34
37
14
15
100
The table reveals that 37 % of the respondents are business people and 34 % of the respondents are
employees and 15 % of the respondents are agriculture & others and 14 % of the respondents are
Professionals.
Family Monthly Income Wise Distribution of the Respondents
Table showing the Family monthly income wise distribution of the respondents
Table 5.
Family Monthly Income
< 14000
14000 18000
> 18000
Total
No of respondents
35
30
34
100
Percentage
35
30
34
100
The table reveals that 35 % of the respondents are below 14000 and 34 % of the respondents are above
18000 and 30 % of the respondents are between 14000 to 18000.
Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Awareness of LG Products
The study was conducted on the basis to know the awareness of the respondents towards the LG
products.
It is concluded that Television, LG Mobile and Refrigerators are known to more than 60% of the
respondents.
The Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents towards Selective LG Products on the
Basis of Quality Factor
It is used to analyse the level of satisfaction in the quality factor
Null Hypothesis: The opinion on quality is moderate.
Level of significance: Let = 0.05 be the level of significance.
Test statistics:
Table 7.
OPINION
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
Moderate
Dis-satisfied
Total
OBSERVED N
78
18
3
1
100
EXPECTED N
7
43
43
7
OBSERVED N
27
44
22
4
3
100
EXPECTED N
4
23
45
24
4
Among the respondents who registered their views in the study, 67 % were married and 33 %
were Unmarried.
The study found 41% of the respondents are under graduate and 24% of the respondents are
post graduate and 23 % of the respondents are up to school level and 12% of the respondents
are professionals
It reveals that 37 % of the respondents are business people and 34 % of the respondents are
employees and 15 % of the respondents are agriculture & others and 14 % of the respondents
are Professionals.
This study also reveals that 35 % of the respondents are below 14000 and 34 % of the
respondents are above 18000 and 30 % of the respondents are between 14000 to 18000.
Analysis of awareness of the respondents shows that Television, LG Mobile and Refrigerators
are known to more than 60% of the respondents.
Analysis of the sources of awareness of the respondents reveals that Television is the major
source through which majority of the customers came to know about most of the LG Products.
Friends and Relatives and Newspaper are the sources through which mobile is known to the
most of the respondents.
Analysis of the level of satisfaction reveals that majority of the respondents are highly satisfied
with the Quality, Models/styles and customer service and they are satisfied with Price,
Advertisement, Durability, availability of spare parts and after sales service
The level of satisfaction of respondents belonging to various age groups reveals that
respondents belonging to various age groups have an average score level of satisfaction on the
features of LG products.
The level of satisfaction of respondents belonging to various levels of income reveals that
respondents belonging to various level of income have an average score level of satisfaction
on the features of LG products.
The level of satisfaction of respondents belonging to various educational levels reveals that
respondents belonging to various levels of education have an average score level of
satisfaction on the features of LG products.
The level of satisfaction of respondents belonging to various level of occupation reveals that
respondents belonging to various levels of occupation have an average score level of
satisfaction on the features of LG products.
SUGESSTIONS
As far as quality may concern the respondents were highly satisfied. But it should increase the
service standard.
After Sales service, advertisement and other factors are should need improvement.
The price of the product should be modified competitively. So this factor has to be improved
with a view to retain and attract more buyers.
The company should work towards providing more sales promotion offers to attract the
customers.
CONCLUSION
Marketing starts before production and continues after sales. Marketing is the process of creating
customers. LG products are liked by one and all. The study shows that most of the sale is done on
basis of sales promotion activities and TV advertisement etc. The important attribute of the product is
quality and prices should be taken care. Product attributes like permanence and after sales service has
been appreciated. It is certified that the customer satisfaction concept is an unpredictable one in any
kind of marketing but this study has attempt its best to reveal the same.
REFERENCES
1. Rajendraprasad.K et.al (2012), A relative analysis on customers satisfaction of Microwave oven:
study on select companies, Zenith International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol.2 Issue
2, February 2012, ISSN 2231 5780.
2. Ms.S.Santhini et. al.(2012) A Study on Customers Satisfaction towards Selective Sony Products
with Special Reference to Coimbatore City, IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSRJBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 9, Issue 5 (Mar. - Apr. 2013), PP 28-32.
3. http://www.esomar.org/
4. http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/73944/DocLib/Customer%20satisfaction.PDF
5. http://epubl.ltu.se/1653-0187/2006/58/LTU-PB-EX-0658-SE.pdf
6. http://bear.warrington.ufl.edu/centers/mks/articles/CustomerSatisfaction.pdf
7. Philip Kotler, Marketing Management, 2011.
8. C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology, 2010.
10