Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management of Change & Organisational Development: Instant Downloadable Solution From
Management of Change & Organisational Development: Instant Downloadable Solution From
PART B
CASE STUDY -1
CROSS TRAINING EMILY
Emily, who has the reputation of being an excellent worker, is a machine
operator in a furniture manufacturing plant that has been growing at a rate of
15% to 20% each year for the past decade. New additions have been built
onto the plant, new plants opened in the region, workers hired, new product
lines developed, lots of expansion, but with no significant change in overall
approach to operations, plant lay-out, ways of managing workers, or in the
design processes. Plant operations as well as organizational culture are rooted
in traditional Western management practices and logic, based largely on the
notion of mass production and economies of scale. Over the past four years,
the company has been growing in number and variety of products produced
and in market penetration; however, profitability has been flattening and
showing signs of decline. As a result, management is beginning to focus more
on production operations (internal focus) rather than new market strategies,
new products, and new market segments (external focus), in developing their
strategic plans. They hope to get manufacturing costs down, improve
consistency of quality and ability to meet delivery times better, while
decreasing inventory and increasing flexibility.
One of several new programs initiated by management in this effort to
improve flexibility and lower costs was to get workers cross-trained. However,
when a representative from Human Resources explained this program to
Emilys supervisor, Jim, he reluctantly agreed to cross-train most of his
workers, but NOT Emily.
Jim explained to the Human Resources person that Emily works on a
machine that is very complex and not easy to effectively operate. He has tried
many workers on it, tried to train them, but Emily is the only one that can
consistently get product through the machine that is within specification and
still meet production schedules. When anyone else tries to operate the
machine, which performs a key function in the manufacturing process, it either
ends up being a big bottle neck or producing excessive waste, which creates a
lot of trouble for Jim.
Jim goes on to explain that Emily knows this sophisticated and
complicated machine inside and out, she has been running it for five years.
She likes the challenge; she says it makes the day go by faster, too. She is
meticulous in her work, a very skilled employee who really cares about the
quality of her work. Jim told the HR person that he wished all of his workers
were like Emily. Jim was adamant about keeping Emily on this machine and
not cross-training her. The HR person was frustrated. He could see Jims point
but he had to follow executive orders: Get these people cross-trained.
Around the same period of time, a university student was doing a field
study in the section of the plant where Emily worked and Emily was one of the
workers he interviewed. Emily told the student that, in spite of the fact that
the plant had some problems with employee morale and excessive employee
turnover, she really liked working there. She also mentioned that she is hoping
that she did not have to participate in the recent Program of the Month
which was having operators learn each others jobs. She told the student that
it would just create more waste if they tried to have other employees run her
machine.
Emily seemed to take a special liking for the student and began to open
up to him. She told him that her machine really didnt need to be so difficult
and touchy to operate, with a couple of rather minor design changes in the
machine and better maintenance, virtually anyone could run it. She had tried
to explain this to her supervisor a couple of years ago but he just told her to
do her work and leave operations to the manufacturing engineers. She also
said that, if workers up stream in the process would spend a little more time
and care to keep the raw material in slightly tighter specifications, it would go
through her machine much more easily and trouble-free, but that they were
too focused on going fast. She expressed a lack of respect for the managers
who couldnt see this and even joked about how managers didnt know
anything.
CASE STUDY - 2
John and Peter are working in an engineering organization - a reputed
one, where excellence goes hand-in-hand with every new imperative
flexibility. By laying down its clear-cut policies and procedures and
corporate plans this organization has earned the distinctions of being
one of the best managed companies always striving for excellence by
keeping itself abreast of the developments in the endlessly changing
scenario. During the recent review of the functioning of one of the
departments headed by Peter it was discovered that his department had
been continuously showing declining trend in terms of meeting the
targets fixed for them and the problems of high rate of turnover /
absenteeism came to light. Majority of subordinates working under
Peter were dissatisfied with their job and were feeling frustrated and
depressed over the way they were being handled by him. There was a
break-down of communication and innumerable complaints about the
rude behavior of Peter started pouring in. Peter on the other hand, has
been in this department for the last so many years and was in habit of
treating his subordinates in the traditional style. The situation started
aggravating day-by-day. The workers under Peter had to take shelter of
Unions for airing their grievances and the management was naturally
disturbed over the state of affairs and could no longer afford to be a
silent spectator. Search for a suitable replacement of Peter was
accordingly initiated and John was identified for this purpose. John was
selected for replacing Peter as he possessed the skills of managing
different types of people under different situations. His acceptability and
credibility had all along been of the highest order. Initially, of course,
this sudden change was a painful surprise for John and as it always
happens, any change in status-quo affects people and John was no
exception. However, John moved into the department and was soon
able to overcome initial difficulties. With his concerted efforts and
sincerity of purpose, he was soon able to create a strong trust bond
with his subordinates. He gave them a free hand in setting time-bound
goals for themselves. The subordinates were by then participating
arriving at the vital decisions in regard to their production and
productivity, a cordial and harmonious atmosphere developed in this
department under John. All this naturally resulted in a 'blessing in
disguise' both for the management and the workers in as much as the
department paved the way in improving the climate and culture of the
organization.
Questions:
1. Identify the issues involves in the above case. 2. What in your
opinion could be the causes for replacement of Peter and the secret of
success of John in the so-called difficult department? 3. "Developing an
Part - C
Objective Type Set - 1
1. Change efforts to overcome the pressures of both individual resistance and
group conformity is called:
a) Refreezing
b) Mobilizing
c) Unfreezing
d) Planned change
2. "First-order change" is change that:
a) Is multidimensional, multilevel, discontinuous, and radical
b) Provides insight into the ability of some individuals to resist change
c) Is linear and continuous
d) Is very threatening
3. ________ is an OC approach that focuses on data collection and analysis
using a scientific methodology
a) Action research
b) Lewins three step model
c) Organizational development
d) Process consultation
4. When people resist change because they hear what they want to hear and
they ignore information that challenges those perception, they are resisting
change because:
a) economic factors
b) the fear of unknown
c) selective information processing
d) the security needs
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
13. Which of the following is a tactic that managers can use to reduce
resistance to change?
Coercion
Manipulation
Education & Communication
all of the above
a)
b)
c)
d)
14. Which one of the following is not a part of Effective Change Management?
Motivating Change
Initiating Change
Creating Vision
Developing political support
b) Team Building
c) Sensitivity Training
d) Process Consultation
18. Interventions that are aimed at improving communication ability are:
a) Structural interventions
b) Intergroup interventions
c) Interpersonal interventions
d) Process consultation
19. Inter group development seeks to
a) facilitate entry and exit of members into groups
b) change attitudes, stereotypes and the perceptions the group have of
each other
c) change the group structure and leadership
d) Merge two groups into functioning teams
20. When organizational development involves radical change that is
multidimensional and multilevel it is
most likely going through
a) Structural change
b) Technological change
c) First order change
d) Second order change
21. Grid Organization Development technique was designed by
a) Robert R Blake
b) Jane S Mouton
c) Roger Harrison
d) Both a and b
22. Team building intervention which is designed to clarify role expectation is
a) Grid OD
b) Role Analysis Technique
c) Role negotiation Technique
d) Job design
23 In managerial Grid, an individuals style can be best described as which of
the following:
a) the way one dresses
b) ones concern for production and people
c) how one interacts with management
d) the way one deals with the problem
24. The assumption underlying the use of survey feedback in OD is
a) surveys are the best way to collect data
b) a great deal of data is collected
c) it is used to provide feed back and to initiate change in the organization
d) responses can be easily be interpreted
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
Individuals
Dyads
Groups
Organization
(b). Dyad
(c). Group
(d). Organisation
11. Which of the following factors influence the choice of an OD
intervention:
(a). Applicability
(b). Feasibility
(c). Acceptability
(d). All of the above
12. Residential analysis essentially deals with understanding of:
(a). How a given organization really functions
(b). Level of motivation
(c). Inter and intra group relationship
(d). Communication network
13. Process Consultation is an OD technique, which is used for:
(a). Individuals
(b). Triads
(c). Group
(d). Organization
14. Survey Feedback is an OD technique, which is used for:
(a). Individual
(b). Dyad
(c). Group
(d). Organization
15. In diagnostic workshops, the atmosphere should be free, open and
informal. In creating this atmosphere the facilitators plays:
(a). A major role
(b). A minor role
(c). No role
(d). An observer's role
16. MBO is an OD technique, which is used for:
(a). Individual
(b). Dyad
(c). Group
(d). Organization
17. The six box model of OD is given by:
(a). Kurt Lewin
(b). Elton Mayo
(c). Marvin Weisbord
(c). Training
(d). Phasing of change
38. Coping with indifference of management can be overcome by:
(a). Phasing of change
(b). Role clarity
(c). Providing support of resources
(d). None of the above
39. Role negotiation technique involves:
(a). Contract setting
(b). Confrontation meeting
(c). Counseling
(d). Transactional analysis
40. Components of evaluation can be:
(a). Policy making group
(b). Objectives
(c). Resources allocation
(d). Motivation
Instant Downloadable Solution from AiDLo.com