UNIVERSITI

TEKNOLOGI
MARA
KAMPUS PULAU PINANG
GROUP MEMBER:
NO

NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM CODE : EC221

COURSE CODE : CES522

GROUP : ..
LECTURER : ..
SEMESTER: SEPTEMBER 2015 JANUARY 2016

TASK

CO1:PO5

CO2:PO4

TOTAL

/30

/20

/50

/20

/10

/30

/50

/50

/80

/130

3
TOTAL

/50

Instruction to Students

13
0

70

1. Answer all questions.

2. Action will be taken for those students who
are found to copy their answers in any
manner.

MINI PROJECT : REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN

CONFIDENTIAL

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT
Learning outcomes :
At the end of this task students should be able to:
i) Analyze and justify suitable design calculation for the case studies.
(CO1:PO5, CO2:PO4)
ii) Diagnose the structural failure and propose execution plan to solve the
damage. (CO2:PO4)
iii) Complete a proper report with introduction, content, conclusion and
references. (CO2:PO4)
TASK 1
Propose the design calculation and problem solving for the given structural layout
plan as shown in Figure 1. Each group is assigned to design the beam and slab
based on the Table 1 below. Every group must provide the complete design of the
reinforced concrete structural elements which includes analysis, design and
detailing.
Marks:
CO1:PO5 (30 marks)
CO2:PO4 (20 marks)
Table 1 : Design Specification
Group
Concrete
Class
Reinforceme
nt (mm)
Size beam
(mm)

1
C25/3
0
H12

2
C30/37

6
C30/3
7
H16

7
C35/45

H25

5
C25/3
0
H12

H20

8
C40/5
0
H25

150 x
300

200 x
400

300 x
600

150 x
300

200 x
400

250 x
500

300 x
600

2/A-E

250
x
500
3/A-E

Beam
design
Slab panel
Slab
thickness
(mm)
Ceiling
height (mm)
Brickwall
thickness
(mm)
Brickwall
Type
Location

1/A-E

E/1-4

C/1-4

B/1-3

A/1-3

D/1-3

FS1
125

FS2
150

FS5
175

FS4
200

FS3
125

FS6
150

FS5
175

FS8
200

2750

2600

3000

3300

2700

2650

2900

3150

115

125

115

125

115

125

115

125

Sand

Clay

Sand

Clay

Sand

Clay

Sand

Clay

Sungai
Lembin

Kota
Samarah

Jengk
a

Kundasa
ng

Camer
on

Kuala
Lump

Georgeto
wn

Langka
wi

H16

3
C35/
45
H20

4
C40/50

2 | Page

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT

Fire
Resistance
Finishes

an

R30

R60

R90

R120

Cerami
c Tiles

Mosaic

Marbl
e

Cement
Randor

Highlan
d
R30

ur

Parque

R60

R90

R120

Concr
ete
Tiles

Pebble
Tiles

Cerami
c Tiles

500

500

525

500

FS1
(Dp 100)

FS2

FS3

FS4

FS5

FS6

FS7

FS8

1
475

2
500

3
FS9

475

4
Figure 1: Structural Layout Plan
Note: Dp 100 for slab FS1 only.

TASK 2
Based on the proposed slab that need to be designed in TASK 1, analyze the
possible optimum yield line pattern that produces the best resistance for the slab
3 | Page

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT
panel by providing acceptable reasons. In addition, describe the approach adopted
in yield line analysis to obtain the moment resistance for the slab panel. Students
are advised to use the action values from slab analysis in TASK 1.
Marks:
CO1:PO5 (20 marks)
CO2:PO4 (10 marks)
Table 2 : Moment Ratio Value
Group
Slab
panel
Mx/My
Mx/Mx
My/My
TASK 3

1
FS1

2
FS2

3
FS5

4
FS4

5
FS3

6
FS6

7
FS5

8
FS8

1.2
1.3
1.4

1.3
1.4
1.5

1.4
1.5
1.6

1.5
1.6
1.7

1.6
1.7
1.8

1.7
1.8
1.9

1.8
1.9
2.0

1.9
2.0
2.1

Comment and discuss on Figure 2 below. Identify the possible failure causes and
propose stable repairing techniques. Your report should consist of:
i) Introduction of case studies which stated the diagnostic of failure
ii) Possible causes of the failure with appropriate justification with supporting figures
and diagrams
iii) Repairing plan by considering action to be taken, time and type of cost that would
occur
iv) Conclusion
Marks:

CO2:PO4 (50 marks)

4 | Page

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT

Figure 2 : Reinforced Concrete Structural Failure

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
TASK 1

Design
Parameter

Poor
1-3
Incorrect
identified the
design
parameter.

Average
4-7
Identified the
design
parameter with 2
incorrect
parameters.

Action Analysis

Incorrect

Correctly

Good
8-10
Correctly
identified the
design
parameter with
only 1 incorrect
parameter.
Correctly

Outcomes
CO1:PO5

CO1:PO5
5 | Page

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT
calculation of
action analysis.

Structural
Analysis
(ULS)

Incomplete
design.

Structural
Check
(SLS)

Incomplete
check 2 or more
serviceability
check.

Detailing

No provision of
reinforcement
detailing.

calculate action
analysis with
error at
permanent
action and
variable action.
Complete design
with inaccurate
provision of main
reinforcement.

Incorrect values
used in SLS
check with
complete
calculation.
Provide detailing
with minor
errors.

calculate action
analysis with
minor error on
action values.

Complete
design with
suitable
provision of
main
reinforcement.
Complete check
with correct
values.

CO1:PO5

Complete
detailing.

CO2:PO4

CO2:PO4

TASK 2

Analysis

Poor
1-3
Incomplete
analysis.

Design

Incomplete
design.

Detailing

No provision of
reinforcement
detailing.

Average
4-7
Complete
analysis with
incorrect answer.
Complete design
with major error.

Provision of
incorrect
reinforcement
detailing.

Good
8-10
Complete
analysis with
correct answer.
Complete
design with
correct answer
and minor error.
Complete
detailing with
minor error.

Outcomes
CO1:PO5

CO1:PO5

CO2:PO4

TASK 3
6 | Page

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT

Introduction

Design
calculation

Repairing
execution
plan

Conclusion

References

Poor
1-3
Acknowledge
the task given

Good
8-10
Initiate effort with
some evidence
relate with current
issues to discuss
the given task

Outcome
s
CO2:PO4

able to express
effort in design
with
diagrams/figures/s
ample
calculaations
Aware of
Able to propose
Able to
execution plan
at least 3
recommend
with minimum
execution plan
more that 3
effort
considering
execution plan
action to be
by considering
taken/time/cost
time, cost and
A good
suitable
elaboration of
procedures/acti
execution plan
on to be taken

Excellent
without
copying from
elaboration of
other sources
task and able
to relate with
current issues
without
copying from
other sources
Able to manage Able to manage
Able to manage
information
information with
information with
with poor
good conclusion
satisfactorily
conclusion
inference
Not able to find Able to find
Able to find
relevant
sources but not
sources relevant
sources (less
relevant to the
to the given task
than 2
given task (more (more than 3
references
than 2
references
excluding
references
excluding internet
internet
excluding
sources)
sources)
internet sources)

CO2:PO4

Aware of design
procedure
involved in
completing the
task

Average
4-7
Able to discuss
problems and
contribute
relevant
justification to
support the
given task
Able to conduct
proper design
process

CO2:PO4

CO2:PO4

CO2:PO4

7 | Page

CES522/OCT2015/MINI PROJECT

8 | Page