11.

Meunarodna Konferencija
Bezbednost saobraaja u lokalnoj zajednici
Srbija, Vrnjaka Banja, Hotel Zvezda,
13-16. april 2016.

11th International Conference

Road Safety in Local Community
Serbia, Vrnjacka Banja, Hotel Zvezda,
April 13 16, 2016.

POSSIBILITY OF INTRODUCING THE INDICATORS FOR TRAFFIC
SAFETY IN THE MONITORING SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF
MACEDONIA
1, 2
: ,
, , ,

.
,
.

(, 2008).
2009
( 2011 2020 )
50%.
.
2015-2020 ,
,
- 30%, 40%,
- . ,
,
.
: , , ,
, , ..., ,
.. 68, , , elmmus@yahoo.com
2 , , ..., ,
. , , , meritamustafai@yahoo.com
1

171

Abstract: In the science of traffic safety, the question is whether it is possible to assess the situation
of traffic safety with appropriate indicators, etc., which in itself will keep the information for
example on the affected areas in road safety. With monitoring indicators of traffic safety, is to be
understood and precisely define problems in traffic safety, but also to plan effective measures for
road safety. The relationship between current and desired values of the indicators determines what
should be foreseen at the programs for traffic safety and the measures to be taken. With the UN
General Assembly Resolution of 2009 is determined the Decade of Action for Road Safety (20112020 years) and the target is the number of deaths in road accidents to be reduced by 50%. Second
National Strategy of the Republic of Macedonia, to improve road safety for the period 2015-2020,
aims to the number of victims in road accidents be reduced to the average number of victims among
the EU Member States, the number of victims -drivers to reduce by 30% the number of serious
injuries to be reduced by 40%, while the number of children - victims of traffic to be reduced to
zero. The aim is the mode of action, as well as measures to be taken by the local community, as well
as the role of political authorities to improve road safety through the monitoring of SPI. The volume
of abstract cannot be more than 250 words.
Keywords: indicators, measurement, road safety, local community

1.

,
,

, ,
, ,
.
, e ,
: ,
.

. 2009
( 2011 2020 )
50%,
2020 .

2010 - 2020 .
, ,
1,3 , ( 2,2%
), 20-50
. 140.000
, 3.000 15.000
.
500 ,
1-3% . -
5-44 .
,
,
2,4 . ,

172

11.
, , , 13 16. 2016.

.
,
.


.

.
,
.

, ,
, , .
,

. ,

.
, ,
, ,

.
(
, )
. (
) ()

(Hakert , 2007).


. ,
,
, ,
()

( , ). ,
, , (intermediate outcomes)
(Road Safety Performance Indicators).

(, )
-
. : - - - - -
,
( 1).( , . , , 2012)

173

1.

2.

79 2012 ,
28 ,

. 16%
. 23 % .
,
2004 . 2009
2014
36% ,
, 32%. 2013
.
200
150
100

82

50

67

83

82

51

66

71

89

53

81

2010
2011
2012

2013

0
2009

2.

5000
4000
3000
2000

1203
3154

2009

1161
3065

1213
3250

1063
3048

2010
2011
2012

1077
3159
2013

3.
174

11.
, , , 13 16. 2016.

44 %
( 2).
2009 2013 ,
73% ( 3).

4.

,

44%.
17%.
8 % .

5.

175

,
26%.
16%,
13%.
11% 3%.

. , .

2010-2014 ( 1).

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

3.

10,5%
6,1%
4,9%
7,4%
10,6%
8,0%
20,7%
8,2%
9,4%
17,3%
17,8%
15,2%
12,5%
6,5%
5,6%
9,2%
12,1%
9,4%

9,3%
10,3%
11,6%
12,3%
13,2%
11,3%
9,5%
11,4%
15,2%
16,0%
12,0%
12,4%
9,3%
10,5%
12,2%
13,0%
13,0%
11,5%

6,7%
8,1%
9,3%
10,9%
12,3%
9,3%
5,6%
7,3%
9,1%
10,7%
8,6%
8,0%
6,5%
8,0%
9,3%
10,9%
11,6%
9,1%

12,9%
17,5%
20,1%
17,8%
12,6%
16,0%
3,0%
1,9%
0,7%
0,5%
0,4%
1,4%
11,0%
14,6%
17,1%
14,6%
10,1%
13,3%

4,5%
5,0%
4,9%
5,6%
6,2%
5,2%
2,3%
3,0%
3,7%
4,5%
4,8%
3,6%
4,0%
4,6%
4,7%
5,4%
5,9%
4,9%

2,3%
2,8%
2,5%
2,1%
3,0%
2,5%
4,7%
1,7%
5,8%
4,9%
6,0%
4,6%
2,7%
2,6%
3,0%
2,6%
3,6%
2,9%

9,3%
7,2%
6,3%
5,1%
3,5%
6,5%
0,0%
0,0%
0,5%
1,2%
1,5%
0,6%
7,5%
5,8%
5,4%
4,4%
3,1%
5,4%

2,9%
3,0%
2,5%
2,6%
3,2%
2,8%
3,1%
3,4%
2,3%
1,8%
2,1%
2,6%
2,9%
3,1%
2,5%
2,5%
3,0%
2,8%

1,6%
1,0%
0,9%
1,1%
0,7%
1,1%
5,2%
8,4%
4,9%
6,9%
8,5%
6,8%
2,3%
2,4%
1,5%
2,1%
2,3%
2,1%

0,6%
0,6%
0,8%
1,0%
0,9%
0,8%
0,0%
0,1%
0,0%
0,1%
0,2%
0,1%
0,5%
0,5%
0,6%
0,9%
0,8%
0,6%

1,2%
1,6%
1,4%
1,2%
0,7%
1,2%
0,3%
0,2%
0,3%
0,1%
0,3%
0,3%
1,1%
1,4%
1,2%
1,0%
0,6%
1,1%

1,5%
1,4%
1,8%
1,1%
0,5%
1,3%
0,0%
0,0%
0,0%
0,0%
0,0%
0,0%
1,2%
1,2%
1,5%
0,9%
0,4%
1,0%

1. 2010-2014 . ( )

36,7%
35,3%
32,9%
31,8%
32,4%
34,0%
45,5%
54,3%
48,1%
35,7%
37,7%
44,3%
38,4%
38,9%
35,3%
32,5%
33,5%
35,9%

-
,
,
.
, ,
.
, .

.

176

11.
, , , 13 16. 2016.

,
.
.
(2012)
(
) (
) ,
, .
:
= +
-
-
- ,
( ),
'''',
1% :
% =/ 100 [%]
, ,
,
, ,
.

(%)
-
.
,
( ),
.

(
),
(, , , , .),
(, , .),
(C&B ) (C&E
), .
.
(
, ,
, , .), , .
,
, ,

.
,

( , ,
, .).

177

,
.

( 2)
( ),
.

( . , 2015).
2.

(%)

y = -156,55x+17.394

-0,90%

y = 186,24x-7.047,3

+2,64%

y = 0,7652x+5,4094

+14,15%

y = -3,1547x+1.042,4

-0,30%

y = -461,61x+65685

-0,70%

y = 1813x+26454

+6,85%

2014.
-

73,5%
95%
-19,4%
41,3%
5%
-95,8%
0,47%
0,05%
-6,1
94,9%
99%
-1,2%
98,4%
95%
!!!

2014.
-

80,4%
95%
-13,1%
38,6%
5%
-88,7%
0,69%
0,05%
-9,1%
93,4%
99%
-1,7%
94,4%
95%
-0,4%

,
.,

( 3).
3.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

178

44

17

26
13
16
11
3

15
2
3
3
8

11.
, , , 13 16. 2016.

,
:
16% ,
11,3%,
9,3%, 8,%,
6,5 %, 5,2%.
: 15,2%,
12,4%, 8,0%,
6,8%, 4,6%,
3,6%.
,
,
,
,
( ,
, .).
4.

,
,
, .

.
,
,
()
, ,

.
,

.

,

.



.
2015-2020

:
,
179

.
.
5.

LITERATURA
[1] , . , ., , ., , . , .. "
, ." X
'' ''. , 2010. 164173.
[2] , . , . "
." 7. ''
'',. , 2012. 111-116.
[3] : , ... .,

: 2015-2020, , , 2014.
[4] ; ; . "

,." 10.
. , ,
2015. 21-28.
[5] ; ; . "

,." 10.
. , ,
2015. 21-28.
[6] , . " ." : , 2008.
[7] Hakkert, A.S and V. Gitelman (Eds.). "Road Safety Performance Indicators: Manual."
Deliverable D3.8 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. 2007.
[8] Hakkert, A.S, Gitelman, V. and Vis, M.A. "Road Safety Performance Indicators: Theory.
." Deliverable D3.6 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. 2007.
[9] http://www.who.int/roadsafety/decade_of_action/plan/en/.
[10] , . . "
2011-2020." 2011.

180