Text in Olive Green is entered manually

RAG reporting entered manually

projectname projectmanager

1 Project 1 Projectmanager 1
2 Project 2 Projectmanager 2
3 Project 3 Projectmanager 3
4 Project 4 Projectmanager 4
5 Project 5 Projectmanager 5
6 Project 6 Projectmanager 6
7 Project 7 Projectmanager 7
8 Project 8 Projectmanager 8
9 Project 9 Projectmanager 9
10 Project 10 Projectmanager 10
11 Project 11 Projectmanager 11
12 Project 12 Projectmanager 12
13 Project 13 Projectmanager 13

1 Project 1
2 Project 2
3 Project 3
4 Project 4
5 Project 5
6 Project 6
7 Project 7
8 Project 8
9 Project 9
10 Project 10
11 Project 11
12 Project 12
13 Project 13
This Programme Fever Chart is made by Marten Schrder
Contact me on marten@inspiring-people.nl with any questions.

Thanks for having a look at it!

 HuidigProgr Risks ResouQuali PlannFinancmax value
Red 55 7 7 7 7 7 7 97
Ambe 40 5 5 5 5 5 5 70
Green 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7

Overall Current statusses start

Resources

Financials
Planning
Progress

Quality
executive Huidig

Risks
Vorig

date
Executive 1 GreenGreen GreenGreenGreenGreenGreenGreen 8/1/2013
Executive 2 AmbeAmberAmbeAmbeAmbeGreenAmbeAmbe 7/1/2013
Executive 3 GreenGreen GreenGreenGreenGreenGreenGreen 8/1/2013
Executive 4 GreenGreen GreenAmbeGreenGreenGreenGreen 10/1/2013
Executive 5 AmbeAmberAmbeAmbeAmbeGreenAmbeGreen 7/1/2013
Executive 6 GreenAmberAmbeAmbeGreenGreenAmbeGreen 12/5/2013
Executive 7 GreenAmberAmbeAmbeAmbeAmbeAmbeAmbe 11/1/2013
Executive 8 AmbeRed Red Red Red Red Red Green 5/15/2013
Executive 9 GreenGreen GreenGreenGreenGreenAmbeGreen 6/1/2013
Executive 10 GreenGreen Red GreenGreenGreenGreenGreen 1/1/2014
Executive 11 GreenGreen GreenGreenGreenGreenGreenGreen 7/1/2013
Executive 12 GreenGreen AmbeAmbeAmbeAmbeGreenGreen 1/1/2014
Executive 13 GreenGreen GreenGreenGreenGreenGreenGreen 7/1/2013

Overall stat Current Statusses

Vorig HuidigProgre Risks ResourQualityPlanni Financi#
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
40.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 2
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3
1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4
40.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 5
40.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 6
40.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 7
55.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 1.0 8
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 9
1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 11
1.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 12
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 13
 Numbers used to calculate
'Status' based on RAG reporting
of different statusses

Fill in last day of

reporting period

end duur 1/31/2014

Calculated total d
date - start date)
date project dgn verstreken
4/3/2014 245 183
3/31/2014 273 214
2/1/2014 184 183
Calculated d
4/30/2014 211 122
reporting da
3/31/2014 273 214
7/17/2014 224 57
12/31/2014 425 91
6/1/2014 382 261
9/30/2014 486 244
3/31/2014 89 30
5/9/2014 312 214
2/28/2014 58 30
3/15/2014 257 214

%
tot score progress
7.0 75
66.0 78
7.0 99
11.0 58
62.0 78
58.0 25
70.0 21
91.0 68
Calculated pro
11.0 50
13.0 34
7.0 69
23.0 52
7.0 83

Above block is used to create Fever Chart

 Fill in last day of
reporting period

Calculated total duration (end

date - start date)

Calculated days running (last

reporting day - start date)

Calculated progress
 Programme Fever Chart
100
90 91

80
70
70
66
60 62
58

Status 50
40
30
23
20
13 11 11 07
10
07 07 0
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Percentage Complete based on Duration

In this example, everything under the Status 30

Projects 2 and 5 are in Amber/Red zone, but ne
Management should focus on projects 7, 12 and
Chart

91 1 Project 1
2 Project 2
3 Project 3
4 Project 4
5 Project 5
66
62 6 Project 6
7 Project 7
8 Project 8
9 Project 9
10 Project 10
11 Project 11
12 Project 12
13 Project 13
0 0
7 0 0
07 07 07 0 0
70 80 90 100 110

on Duration

hing under the Status 30 line is not interesting enough to take action.
Amber/Red zone, but near completion should have been monitored already.
cus on projects 7, 12 and 8 in order of priority based on Percentage complete vs Status.