Issue Title: Circle One: (Pro/Con)

4 3 2 1
Criteria

1. Organization & Completely clear Mostly clear Clear in some Unclear and
Clarity: and orderly and orderly in parts but not disorganized
Main arguments and presentation all parts overall throughout
responses are outlined
in a clear and orderly
way.

2. Use of Argument: Very strong and Many good Some decent Few or no real
Reasons are given to persuasive arguments arguments, but arguments given,
support the resolution arguments given given, with only some significant or all arguments
throughout minor problems problems given had
significant
problems

3. Use of Excellent Good Decent Poor cross-exam

cross-examination cross-exam and cross-exam cross-exam or rebuttals,
and rebuttal: defense against and rebuttals, and/or rebuttals, failure to point
Identification of Negative teams with only minor but with some out problems in
weakness in Negative objections slip-ups significant Negative teams
teams arguments and problems position or failure
ability to defend itself to defend itself
against attack.
against attack.

4. Presentation All style features Most style Few style Very few style
Style: were used features were features were features were
Tone of voice, clarity of convincingly used used used, none of
expression, precision of convincingly convincingly them
arguments all contribute convincingly
to keeping audiences
attention and
persuading them of the
teams case.