Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English 211C
1 May, 2017
The first skill learning outcome is to develop rhetorical knowledge. Through the course
readers and writers practices through the reading and paraphrasing of assigned word journal
articles. We analyzed by reading the articles and then wrote about what the article said, and why
it was important for us to know about in the course. Not only did we simply analyze through
writing the word journals, but we also transitioned between situations and contexts by adjusting
structure, content, diction, and tone. By reading the articles for word journals, we were able to go
from one topic to another different one. We never read one of the same article, which made the
class and work interesting. Transitioning from the Who Am I essay to the IMRaD essay, we were
able to write to different audiences and rhetorical situations. This is an important skill to master
because throughout our school and career lives, we will be required to write according to varying
situations. For example, in school, we may need to write an informal paper to describe out work
ethics, where we use the first person point of view and talk about ourselves, and in our careers,
we may need to write a formal research paper that requires the use of third person point of view.
required to involve critical thinking in our learning process to further create essays and papers
that are appropriate for the class. In order to use critical thinking, we read through several articles
in the beginning of the semester and were required to talk about what he had read and why it was
important to both us and the following classes. This was an important process for us to master
because critical thinking was not only useful in summarizing the content and importance of an
article, but it is also useful in finding the main topics to be discussed in our essays. In the process
of writing our IMRaD essay, we filled out peer review sheets for other students in the class. By
filling out these review sheets, we were both able to find out the mistakes others had in their
papers, and spotted any potential errors we made in our own papers as well. While writing our
Social Justice Synthesis, we had to find both primary and secondary sources to use in order to
make a valid argument. By evaluating the library sources, we were able to narrow down the
We were able to portray the third SLO by working through multiple drafts of a writing
project and reflecting on composing practices. We did this by creating several drafts of our
assignments, editing and revising them before finally creating the final essay that we would
submit. We were also able to utilize various strategies for our writing processes with the use of
technologies. The way in which we did so was when we use Microsoft word to type up each of
our essays, the ODU online library catalog to find primary sources to use for our essays, and
even online website creators in order to create our own website for the final portfolio used and
submitted at the end of the semester. Another part of SLO three that I portrayed was learning to
give and act on productive feedback through writing peer reviews for our classmates, and acted
on it by revising our own essays through our classmates critiques on our own essays. We also
had feedback from Professor Matheson when we had conferences with him throughout the
semester. Not only did he allow us to receive feedback, but he also allowed us to learn more
about how we can improve our writing by requiring us to complete various assignments that
were due the conference dates. I finished a corrective assignment in which I found the
appropriate time to use either affect or effect and also found the appropriate time to use the
correct punctuation marks. Another skill that we learned through English Composition was the
skill to understand that composing strategies and processes differ across communities and
disciplines. We were able to understand this through each essay we wrote. The Who Am I essay
was much less formal compared to the IMRaD essay, because we were able to write in first
person, using I within the essay since we were talking about ourselves. In the IMRaD essay
introduction, we were not allowed to speak in first person because it was a research paper, and
research papers are required to be written in the third person point of view.
The fourth and final skill learning outcome is portrayed throughout the class when we
went through the professor-student conferences. By the day we were to come in to class for the
conference, we were required to complete a Developmental Activity. I feel that through these
conferences and activities, we were able to refine the understanding of linguistic structures,
including grammar, punctuation, and spelling. For the Developmental Activities, I chose to focus
on working on improving my punctuation usage as well as spelling. I used the exercises from
Purdue Owl and worked on my usage of commas, placing them in the correct positions in the
sentences provided. Through Purdue Owl, I also did an exercise about the correct usage of affect
and effect. Although I got a few sentences wrong, I worked through them a second time in order
to fully understand the right times to use which word. Through writing the IMRaD essay, we
worked on practicing genre conventions for structure, paragraphing, tone, and mechanics
because the essay was a formal research paper that required it to be written in format that
differed from the other essays that we wrote for English Composition. The tone of the IMRaD
essay was more formal because it required the use of information pulled out from primary
sources that we found. We were able to demonstrate a clear understanding of intellectual
property rights and applying citation styles systematically through the IMRaD essay and social
justice synthesis as well. I learned how to properly source the articles that I used in my essay
through in-text citations as well as placing them into a separate works cited page at the end of the
essays.