The document lists several factors that can contribute to ineffective online course design, including misalignment of objectives, inexperienced staff, failure to integrate student feedback, role conflicts between instructional designers, course designers, and faculty, lack of continuous quality assurance processes, limited timeframes and staff, technology and system limitations, inadequate training, pressure from management, and lack of support and incentives for instructional designers and course designers.
The document lists several factors that can contribute to ineffective online course design, including misalignment of objectives, inexperienced staff, failure to integrate student feedback, role conflicts between instructional designers, course designers, and faculty, lack of continuous quality assurance processes, limited timeframes and staff, technology and system limitations, inadequate training, pressure from management, and lack of support and incentives for instructional designers and course designers.
The document lists several factors that can contribute to ineffective online course design, including misalignment of objectives, inexperienced staff, failure to integrate student feedback, role conflicts between instructional designers, course designers, and faculty, lack of continuous quality assurance processes, limited timeframes and staff, technology and system limitations, inadequate training, pressure from management, and lack of support and incentives for instructional designers and course designers.
Ineffective QA process Faculty acting as IDs (role conflict) Disconnect between course designer & facilitator (role conflict) Absence of model to evaluate course design Disconnect between ID & faculty (role conflict) Lack of continuous QA & improvement process Lack of user feedback and testing Lack of or inconsistent standards & requirements Overdesigning Ineffective Online Course Design Limited timeframe Limited staff Vendor contractual limitations
Inadequate or lack of training Pressure from management
LMS & technology limitations Institutional policy ambiguity Lack of course design support
ID assuming multiple roles Lack of substantive incentives and compensation