Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This is the opposite of the first and pre-supposes that the community should help
the school. In the past, the municipality supported the elementary schools and was
responsible for teachers salaries and other expenses. But the municipal board had a
say in the running of the school. Since politicians control the school board, the effect of
the community on the school maybe gleaned from the answers to some questions.
The school may function independently, but use the resources of the community
on three levels:
(1) Observation level in which the school just studies the kind of resources available in the
community.
(2) Participation level in which the school makes use of the resources of the community for
work education projects. For example clay may to be used for pot-making, ribs of the
(3) Community improvement wherein the school works on community problems and
contributes to the solution problems. An example is the Sariling Sikap projects initiated
If the school and the community can work together, there will be no disparity in the
graduates turned out by the school and the needs of the community. Then there will be
less unemployment.
discoveries are being made. What should school teach in changing community? The
urbanization, invention, mass media, etc., and not always for good. More and more
responsibilities are being given to the teachers in the school, such as census takers,
How effective are our schools? Schools may be evaluated from three points of
view:
In what kind of environment is the school located? Is it flexible and beautiful? Conducive
to learning? Healthy? Peaceful? There are some schools that do not even have a
campus and where students have their P.E and CAT on the streets. Some schools
situated bordering streets where the noise of traffic is a constant distraction and where
teachers and pupils have to shout to hear each other. A good environment is necessary
2. Point of view of human relationships. This is the most important as feelings and
emotions have a lot to do with learning. According to the law of effect, one learns better
and retains longer what is learned under pleasant conditions. The minimum requirement
of a school are teachers and learners. However, no matter how good the environment, it
cannot compensate for poor teachers. It is not enough to have rapport between teacher
and class. Teachers and superiors must also have good also exist between teachers, so
that they will cooperate in undertaking school activities and in upholding school morale.
oppressive or is it too free? Is there a quiet, peaceful atmosphere? Are there rallies,
demonstrations, discontent? What do teachers and students do? Are they just loitering
and gossiping? Is the library frequented by students? What kind of discipline is there?
A school who rates high in all three points of view is a good school.
Educational Implications
1. Since the school is a very important national institution, schools runs by foreigners
etc.
2. There should be better screening of teachers, not only as far as academic qualifications
are concerned, but also with reference to character, emotional maturity and ideology.
3. The school and community should work together so that the kind of graduates turned out
will be leaders not only in the academe, but also in the community.
4. The school should find out the manpower needs of the community and give the training
needed.
5. The community should make its resources available to the school and the school
6. The government should not always make use of teachers for its projects as this lessens
7. Parents should invited to school activities that will show them what the school is doing.
8. To foster better relations between school and community, parents may be involved in
REFERENCES
Cook, Lloyd Allen Cook, Elaine Forsyth. A Sociological Approach to Education, 3rd ed.
Stanley, William O., Smith B. Othanel, Benne, Kenneth D. and Anderson, Archibald W.,
Social Foundations of Education. New York: The Dryden Press, Inc. 1956, Section B.
Brossard, James H.D. The Sociology of Child Development. New York: Harper, 1954.