You are on page 1of 53

3G RF Optimisation Basics

Robert Joyce

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


WCDMA Basics
Frequency Reuse
Scrambling Codes
Signal Strength/Quality Measurements in WCDMA
Soft/Softer Handover
Pilot Pollution
Missing Neighbours

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


UK 3G Spectrum Allocations

FDD Uplink FDD Downlink TDD


Licence Operator From (MHz) To (MHz) From (MHz) To (MHz) From (MHz) To (MHz) Total (MHz)
A Hutchison 3G 1920.0 1934.9 2110.3 2124.9 1914.9 1920.0 2x15 + 5 = 35
B Vodafone 1944.9 1959.7 2134.9 2149.7 N/A N/A 2x14.8 = 29.6
C O2 1934.9 1944.9 2124.9 2134.9 1909.9 1914.9 2x10 + 5 = 25
D T-Mobile 1959.7 1969.7 2149.7 2159.7 1899.9 1904.9 2x10 + 5 = 25
E Orange 1969.7 1979.7 2159.7 2169.7 1904.9 1909.9 2x10 + 5 = 25

TDD FDD Uplink FDD Downlink

1910 1920 1935 1945 1960 1970 19802110 2125 2135 2150 2160
1905 1915

Licence A - Hutchison 3G Licence D - T-Mobile


Licence B - Vodafone Licence E - Orange
Licence C - O2
January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Frequency Reuse
Initially operators have been launching with just a single carrier
Vodafone NZ Network will initially be FDD only
Vodafone will launch using only the FDD carrier (F1 =10588)
All launch cells will use F1 & therefore Vodafone NZs 3G network
will have a frequency reuse of 1
Frequency
UARFCN (MHz)
FDD Uplink F1 9638 1927.6
F2
F3

FDD Downlink F1 10588 2117.6


F2
F3

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Scrambling Codes & CPICH

CPICH

The Common Pilot Indication Channel (CPICH) is broadcast from


every cell
It carries no information and can be thought of as a beacon
constantly transmitting the Scrambling Code of the cell
It is this beacon that is used by the phone for its cell measurements
for network acquisition and handover purposes (Ec, Ec/Io).

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


3G Coverage Measurements
The majority of 3G coverage measurements are based upon
measurements of the CPICH
Golden Rule: If the UE cant see the CPICH the UE cant see the
cell.
Initial 3G network optimisation will be performed purely from CPICH
measurements
Three key related measurements for 3G optimisation are

Ec - The Received Signal Level of a particular CPICH (dBm)


Io - The Total Received Power (dBm)
Ec/Io - The CPICH Quality (The ratio of the above two values)

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Total Received Power Io

Io

In a WCDMA network the User Equipment (UE) may receive signals


from many cells whether in handover or not

Io* = The sum total of all of these signals + any background noise (dBm)

*Note: Sometimes Io is referred to as No, RSSI or ISSI

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Received Power of a CPICH Ec

Ec1 Ec2

Using the properties of SCs the UE is able to extract the respective


CPICH levels from the sites received

Ec* = The Received Power of a Particular CPICH (dBm)

*Note: Sometimes Ec is referred to as RSCP


January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


The CPICH Quality (Ec/Io)

Ec1 Ec2

From the previous two measures we can calculate a signal quality for
each CPICH (SC) received

Ec/Io = Ec - Io (dB)

*Note: Sometimes Ec/Io is referred to as Ec/No


January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Example

Ec/Io1=-5dB Ec/Io2 =-10dB

Io=-80dBm
From the above three measurements we can calculate for each pilot
the Ec level for that particular pilot
Ec1 = -80 - 5 = -85dBm
Ec2 = -80 - 10 = -90dBm

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Ec, Io and Ec/Io Measurement
All commercial scanners and test UEs are capable of making Ec, Io and
Ec/Io measurements
It is these measurements that are used for cover analysis and basic
optimisation

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


3G Scanners
Many types of 3G scanners on the market
Agilents 3G Scanner & Nitros Software
Anritsus ML8720B 3G scanner
DTI Seagull (Dual band 3G/2G) scanner
From experience the Anritsu scanner is the better of the all three with
a higher sampling rate and greater flexibility
However DTI scanner has added benefit of 2G scanning, ideal for 3G-
2G neighbour optimisation as well as 2G optimisation

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Handovers in WCDMA
Various handover types exist in WCDMA

Those between WCDMA sites (intra-system HO)


Those between WCDMA and GSM (inter-system HO)

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Handovers in WCDMA - Softer HO
Softer handover occurs between sectors of the same site

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Handovers in WCDMA - Soft HO
Soft handover occurs between sectors of the different sites

For both softer and soft it is the Ec/Io levels used to determine whether
a cell should be added or removed from the active set

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Handovers - Inter frequency HO
Inter frequency handover occurs between two WCDMA carriers
Will be used once operator deploys its second carrier, for microcell
layer or capacity purposes

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Handovers - Inter system HO
Inter system handover occurs between 3G and 2G sites
As with all handovers, accurate adjacencies will be required

3G 2G

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Optimisation Basics
Coverage Optimisation
Neighbour Optimisation
Pilot Pollution Optimisation
SHO Optimisation

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Coverage Optimisation
As with 2G if the coverage is inadequate then the call quality will be
inadequate
Therefore this first stage in 3G optimisation is ensuring adequate
coverage
Link budgets should be used to determine both the planning targets
and the drive survey level targets
Note that the planning and drive survey level targets will be different

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Coverage Optimisation
Given below are example target drive survey Ec levels for the
different 3G services
Environment
Service Dense Urban Urban/Suburban Rail Road Rural Indoor
Deep Indoor - 95% Deep Indoor - 95% Indoor Window - 95% Indoor Window - 95% Outdoor - 90% 95%
12.2k Speech -71.0 -81.0 -88.0 -95.0 -102.0 -102.0
64k CSD -72.0 -82.0 -90.0 -96.0 -103.0 -102.0
64k PSD -73.0 -82.0 -90.0 -97.0 -103.0 -103.0
64k CSD Videophone -71.0 -80.0 -88.0 -94.0 -101.0 -101.0
144k CSD -69.0 -79.0 -86.0 -93.0 -100.0 -99.0
144k PSD -70.0 -79.0 -87.0 -94.0 -100.0 -100.0
384k CSD -65.0 -75.0 -84.0 -90.0 -95.0 -95.0
384k PSD -66.0 -76.0 -84.0 -90.0 -96.0 -96.0

These levels are the levels that should be achieved at the roof of the
vehicle
If these levels are not achieved then inbuilding coverage will be poor
Further optimisation with lower coverage levels is very difficult
Solutions: Downtilt, Azimuth, New Site

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Neighbour Optimisation
Missing Neighbours was and still is the biggest cause of poor
performance in most commercial 3G networks
The majority of call drops in early cluster are due to missing
neighbours.
It is therefore essential that the initial neighbour list is thorough, ideally
with neighbours ranked in order of importance
In 3G the UE must be on the best cell at all times otherwise it will
drop the call this is not the case in 2G
3G/2G neighbour lists must also be comprehensive, incorrect 3G/2G
neighbour lists will lead to dropped calls when moving from 3G to 2G
and poor 3G re-selection performance when on 2G

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


3G/3G Neighbour Optimisation
We declare a 3G missing neighbour as a a cell not declared as
neighbour of the best active cell although it is eligible to be added in
the active set.

EcNoMISSING_ N EcNoBEST M arginMISSING_ N


A practical margin of 5dB is recommended as an initial window
anything bigger and the neighbour lists become too large

Solution: 3G Scanner Survey, Actix Analysis, Neighbours Added

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


2G/3G Neighbour Optimisation
2G/3G neighbour optimisation will require the use of both 3G and 2G
drive survey equipment
Dualband scanner files can quickly be processed to pair up the best
3G cells with the best 2G cells for every sample along the drive
survey.

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Pilot Pollution Optimisation
As more and more 3G sites are integrated, the pilot pollution within the
network will increase
With >4 pilots of a similar level it can be very difficult to establish even
a voice call
The higher the data rate the more susceptible the service is to pilot
pollution (bad Ec/Io).
Whilst 3G voice requires an Ec/Io of above -15dB, 384kbps will
required Ec/Io levels of -9dB or higher !!
Pilot pollution should not be confused with poor coverage, where there
is poor coverage, there is generally pilot pollution/bad Ec/Io

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


PS384 - Pilot Pollution Areas

DL_PS384 is much more sensitive to pilot pollution or overlaps than


lower bit-rates. Optimising pilot pollution for PS128 is already a
challenge, for 384 might be an unrealistic target.
Comparison of required EcIo:

Service Voice PS64 PS128 PS384


Min EcIo -15 -13 -13 -9.5

Even with good Ec levels, some areas will never provide reliable
PS384 simply due to cell overlaps. It seems unclear whether a mature
network may ever provide a full 384 footprint.
Conclusion: 384 requires an optimised network

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Required EcIo

GPRS Attach Success Rate vs Serving CPICH Ec/Io

120%

100%

80%

60%
GPRS Attach Success Rate
40%

20%

0%
-19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5
-20%
Serving Cell CPICH Ec/Io (dB)

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


PS384 - required EcIo

DL Application Throughput vs. Serving Cell CPICH Ec/Io


300
DL Application Throughput (kbps)

250

200
Mean DL Application Throughput

Mode DL Application Throughput


150
DL Application Throughput (Last Value)

100

50

0
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0
Serving Cell CPICH Ec/Io (dB)

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Pilot Pollution Optimisation
To avoid confusing areas of poor coverage with areas of pilot pollution
we can define an area of pilot pollution as somewhere where
Best server CPICH_Ec >= Ec target (dBm)
And
Best server CPICH EcNo < Ec/Io target (dB)

The Ec target is the target coverage = -100dBm


The current recommended Ec/Io target = -10dB
Actix is able to identify areas of pilot pollution and display the locations
on a map

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Pilot Pollution Optimisation
There are various means of reducing pilot pollution
New Sites: Additional sites may reduce pilot pollution by bringing
dominance to an area (before optimising for pilot pollution, always
check that a new site is not about to be brought on air in the locality)
Antenna Downtilts: By adjusting tilts on the best servers, or worst
interferers, pilot pollution can be removed

Solution: 3G Scanner Survey, Analysis, Downtilts, New Sites?

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Handover Optimisation
Softer, Soft, Inter-frequency & system HOs have all been optimised on
Nokias trial and other customers networks
Therefore initial HO Optimisation should not require any changes to the
UTRAN parameters .
Instead initial HO optimisation will involve studying how much HO occurs
in the network and where this HO occurs.
For 3G/3G HO, Actix is able to display areas where Softer & Soft HO is
occurring and calculate the percentage of a drive route in SHO
Typically we should be aiming for a SHO area of less that 40%
Optimisation of SHO area should be performed using downtilt and
azimuth changes
Solution: 3G Scanner Survey, Analysis, Downtilt and Azimuth
changes

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Optimisation Basics
Coverage Optimisation
Neighbour Optimisation
Pilot Pollution Optimisation
SHO Optimisation

Everything is based around Ec/Io, to improve this we need to


Increase Ec (improve the best server(s))
Reduce Io (reduce pilots not eligible for the active set)
Get all neighbours optimised
In call drive runs should only take place once Radio Optimisation is
complete

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Overview of Vodafone New Zealand
Optimisation Process

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


OrangeUK 3G Optimisation Process

This section will cover the following;

Overview of Vodafone New Zealand 3G Optimisation Process


Key Performance Indicators
Analysis Tools & Processes
Next Steps

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Overview of Vodafone NZs 3G Optimisation Process
A

Based upon the 3G


1 hour prior to every cluster A.1
Drive test 3G Opt eng must CDF = Cell Definition File
obtain CDF dump from OSS eng

Optimisation Process CDF file


obtainable ?
A.2
No

Check with Nokia


Can drive test
proceed ?
A.3

flowcharts agreed between Yes


Opt manager
Yes

3G Opt eng obtains Alarm A.4

Aircom/Nokia and report and cell availability


report from OSS eng

Vodafone New Zealand Check with Nokia


Yes High number A.5
of alarm ?
Opt manager
No

No
Can drive test Yes High cell Check with Nokia
A.6 A.7
proceed ? availability ? Opt manager

Yes Yes Can drive test


No A.9
Drive test starts A.8 start ?

No
Optimization Stage 1 A.10
(Optimize RF condition)
Can OMC solve
the problem < 4 A.11 Can OMC solve
No hours? B the problem < 4 A.12 No
hours?
Yes
Yes
OMC works on A.13 Stage 1 No
A.14
solving the alarm completed? A OMC works on A.15
Increasing cell
Yes availability

Is the problem Yes Optimization Stage 2 A.17


A.16
solved ? (Optimize Neighbour list)
Yes Is the problem
A.18
C solved ?
No

No
No
Stage 2 A Postpone the drive test A.21
A.20
completed? to next day or until
Postpone the drive test A.19
Problem solved
to next day or until Yes
Problem solved
Optimization Stage 3 A.22
(Optimize Call Performance)

Stage 3 No
A.23
completed? A

Yes
January 2005
KPI measurement A.24
and reporting
AIRCOM International 2005
Overview of Vodafone NZs 3G Optimisation Process
Yes

Based upon the 3G Drive test starts A.8

Optimisation Process Optimization Stage 1 A.10


(Optimize RF condition)

flowcharts agreed between


Aircom/Nokia and B

Vodafone New Zealand


Stage 1 No

Stage 1 & 2 cover the


A.14
completed? A

basic RF Optimisation Yes

A.17
Optimization Stage 2
steps described earlier (Optimize Neighbour list)

Only once these steps are C

completed is it worth Stage 2


No
A
moving onto Stage 3 Call completed?
A.20

Yes
Performance Optimisation Optimization Stage 3 A.22
(Optimize Call Performance)

Stage 3 No
A.23
completed? A

Yes

KPI measurement A.24


January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
In order to benchmark the performance of a 3G network a basic set of
KPI targets are required
The Vodafone NZ 3G KPI targets fall into two categories, RF KPIs and
in-call KPIs
The Vodafone RF KPIs are very simple and concise but focus on the
key RF requirements of Ec (RSCP), Ec/Io and SHO area
The In Call or End To End (E2E) KPIs are somewhat more complex

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Vodafone RF KPIs
The RF targets are defined in terms of: -
RSCP of the Common Pilot Channel
-89 dBm in >= 95% of bins for dense urban
-94 dBm >= 95% of bins for urban
-99 dBm >= 95% of bins for suburban
-104 dBm >= 90% of bins for rural

Ec/Io of Common Pilot Channel in unloaded network


Ec/Io >= 10 dB in >= 95% of bins for DU, U, SU
Ec/Io >= 10 dB in >= 90% of bins for Rural
Ec/Io of Common Pilot Channel in loaded network
Ec/Io >= 14 dB in >= 95% of bins for DU, U, SU
Ec/Io >= 14 dB in >= 90% of bins for Rural
Test case to be agreed
SHO Overhead: 30-40%
This Kpi will be measured according to the formula below:

# _ Bins _ 1 _ Cell _ in _ Active_ Set 1+# _ Bins _ 2 _ Cells_ in _ Active_ Set 2+# _ Bins _ 3 _ Cells_ in _ Active_ Set 3
# _ Bins _ 1 _ Cell _ in _ Active_ Set+# _ Bins _ 2 _ Cells_ in _ Active_ Set+# _ Bins _ 3 _ Cells_ in _ Active_ Set

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


RF Optimisation
Basic RF analysis checking the following

Coverage Optimisation
Neighbour Optimisation
Pilot Pollution Optimisation
SHO Optimisation.

First stage is to run the KPI reports, then follows this with more
detailed analysis.
If the route meets the RF KPIs theres no point doing further analysis

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Actix RF KPI Report
Run the basic RF KPI report check the KPIs

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Basic Sites on air analysis
For each cell in the cluster check that
coverage is seen for the sites expected to
be on air
Check correct SC is radiating in the
expected direction (crossed feeders?)
Highlight those sites not seen on air and
any suspected crossed feeders
But make sure your cell refs data is
accurate !!!

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Coverage (Ec) Analysis
If KPI Report indicates good Ec - no further Ec analysis required !
Otherwise analyse !!
Solution: Tilts, azimuths, new sites

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Neighbour Optimisation
If downtilts are to be made to any sectors, then additional neighbours
should not be added to/or for these cells as they may not be
necessary after downtilts
Actix should be used to generate Missing Neighbour Report from
Scanner data
Remember until the cluster is complete, additional neighbours will
come and go

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


3G/3G Neighbour Optimisation (2)
sc neighbour count
3G Neighbour lists can be generated 8 9 165
automatically by the Actix 8 232 52
8 496 40
The tool runs through every point in the 8 344 34
8 154 18
survey comparing the Ec/Io values of the 8 386 12
SCs seen generating a neighbour list like 8 10 11
8 362 11
the one given 8 145 10
The number of missing neighbours found 8
8
114
256
8
5
will be dependent on the quality of the initial 8 488 5
8 360 4
neighbour list 8 376 4
Dont be scared of adding neighbours !! 8
8
346
50
3
1
8 218 1
8 490 1
8 66 1
8 152 1
8 48 1
8 378 1
8 401 1
9 8 114
9 362 37
9 10 10
January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Pilot Pollution (Ec/Io) Analysis
Run Pilot Pollution query to display areas of pilot pollution on map

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Pilot Pollution (Ec/Io) Analysis
Identify worst Pilot Polluters on map
Solution: tilts, azimuths, new site?

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


SHO Analysis
KPI report will indicate % of route in SHO
Aim for SHO < 40%
Run RE SHO query to display areas on a map - is this due to distant
sites, is it in important high traffic areas?
Solution: Tilts, Azimuths

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Cell Adjacency Planner - CAP
3G 2G Adjacencies

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Cell Adjacency Planner - CAP
3G 3G adjacencies

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


3G/3G Neighbour Optimisation (3)

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Stage 3: In Call Optimisation
Only once the RF Optimisation is complete should In Call analysis be
undertaken
In call analysis will also pick up
Coverage Problems
Pilot Pollution Problems
Missing Neighbours
SHO problems
However if the RF Optimisation has been done correctly, none of the
above should be seen at Stage 3 !
In Call Optimisation will be similar to RF Optimisation
Run In Call KPI report
Analyse any problems seen

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Stage 3: Run Call KPIs Report
Run RE Call KPI report
Identify problem areas, Call Setup Success, Call Drop etc.

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Stage 3: Detailed In call analysis
Detailed in call analysis
Look for the basics first, Ec, Ec/Io, missing neighbours etc.
Only then delve into the detailed L3 message flows.

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005


Process Summary
Stage 0 Cluster Preparation - plots, site checks, neighbour checks
etc.

Stage 1&2 RF optimisation, Ec, Ec/Io, Missing Neighbours, SHO


Area

Stage 3 In Call Analysis (Speech, Video, PS, ISHO etc) will be the
subject of a further training session once Actix Reports in place.

CLUSTER ACCEPTANCE !!

Any questions: robert.joyce@aircom.com.sg

January 2005

AIRCOM International 2005

You might also like