Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr Ian Smith
Head of School
School of Engineering and the Built Environment
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Publication of Eurocodes
Eurocode programme developed by the Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN)
– the European Committee for Standardisation.
1975: ECC identify need to improve functioning of the single market for products and
engineering services
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
• Austria • Latvia
• Belgium • Lithuania
• Cyprus • Luxembourg
• Czech Republic • Malta
• Denmark • Netherlands
• Estonia • Norway
• Finland • Poland
• France • Portugal
• Germany • Slovakia
• Greece • Slovenia
• Hungary • Spain
• Iceland • Sweden
• Ireland • Switzerland
• Italy • UK
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
TC 250
TC 250 TC….
TC…. TC…
TC…
SC00
SC SC11
SC SC…
SC… SC 77
SC SC…
SC…
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Eurocodes Timeline
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
1975 2011
1989 – 1999
EEC initiate Today
programme ENVs produced
• All European public-sector clients have been legally required to commission Eurocode-
compliant structural designs since March 2010.
• Private sector clients can continue to use any effective design methods. But, as most
existing codes will be withdrawn, Eurocodes will be only recognised codes available.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Fundamental requirements
The structure and structural members should be designed, executed
and maintained in such a way that they meet the following:
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
National Foreword
EN Title Page
EN Text
EN Annexes
National Annex
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
EN Annexes
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
National Annexes
• The “link” between Eurocode and national standards for member state.
• Contain rules and NDPs to ensure safety remains a national, and not a
European, responsibility.
• Foreword of each Eurocode lists paragraphs in which national choice
is allowed. However, the National Annex has limited overriding
authority to the Eurocode.
A National Annex cannot change or modify the content of the EN Eurocode
text in any way other than where it indicates that national choices may be
made by means of Nationally Determined Parameters.
Guidance Paper L: § 2.3.4
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
National Annex
The National Annex flavours each Eurocode to each country’s needs.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Published Published
December 2004 November 2007
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
National Annexes
• Part 1: Published November 2007
• Part 2: Published December 2009
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Development of Eurocode 7
• Agreement for geotechnical design more “challenging” than for
EN 1990, EN 1991 and material Eurocodes.
• EN 1997 was one of the later codes to be published.
• Unique in that some national practices maintained within
design process, e.g. the 3 Design Approaches
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Soil properties
8 features considered by drafters of Eurocode 7:
1. Soil properties determined by investigation, EN 1997 Part 2
2. Undrained and drained conditions to be considered
3. Property characteristic value is “cautious estimate” of mean value
4. Soil variability is high, judgement required for ‘k’ values
5. Strength related to normal stress , care required when applying
partial factors of safety to geotechnical loads
6. Soil can redistribute loading from weaker to stronger zones
7. Soil is compressible, SLS usually controls design, though ULS
calculations usually performed in design
8. Soil stress-strain behaviour is complex, few calculation models
provided in EN 1997
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Foreword
1. General
2. Planning of ground investigation
3. Soil and rock sampling and groundwater measurements
4. Field tests in soil and rock
5. Laboratory tests on soil and rock
6. Ground investigation report
Annexes A – X
196 pages
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
In other words…
Design to EN 1997 depends as much on Part 2 as Part 1.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Geotechnical Design
(Eurocode 7: Parts 1 & 2) & NAs
Geotechnical Projects
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Using Eurocode 7
Key aspects
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
This section sets the scene for the design situations and identifies aspects to
be considered in the design, including: factors to be considered (e.g. site
conditions) (§2.1(2)); methods of verifying the limit states (§2.1(4)); and a
means of identifying the complexity of the design together with the
associated risks (§2.1(8)).
Most routine geotechnical design work will fall into Geotechnical Category 2.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
§2.2(1)
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
§2.3(1)
Section 2.3 of Eurocode 7 Part 1 gives brief guidance on designing for the
durability of materials (such as concrete, steel and timber) used in the ground.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Fundamental!
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Cautious estimate
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Derived values
1.5.3 Specific definitions used in EN 1997-2
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
EN 1997-1
Cautious selection
Application of partial
factors
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Other means…
Statistical methods – can be used if sufficient geotechnical
measurements/results exist.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Symbols:
Actions: General: F Permanent: G
Transient: Q
NB geotechnical engineers already use “” for unit weight (weight density).
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Design values
i.e.
characteristic value
design value
partial factor of safety
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Geotechnical Analysis
Verify
Ed ≤ Rd
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
i.e.
Frep = Fk ( 1.0; = 1.0 for persistent actions)
Fd = Frep F
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
(Mk) (Md)
Partial factor of
safety, M
i.e.
Mk
Md
M
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
ad = anom ± a
for which values of a are given in 6.5.4(2) and 9.3.2.2
EN 1997-1:2004 §2.4.6.3(2)
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
i.e.
Edst;d = E{Fd; Xd; ad}dst
where
Edst;d is the design effect of the destabilising action, and
Estb;d = E{Fd; Xd; ad}stb
where
Estb;d is the design effect of the stabilising action.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Design resistances
Equation 6.6 in EN 1990:2002 indicates that the design resistance depends
on material properties and the structural dimension. However, in geotechnical
design, many resistances depend on the magnitude of the actions and so EN
1997-1:2004 §2.4.7.3.3 redefines Equation 6.6 to include the contribution
made by the design action. The clause actually offers three methods of
establishing the design resistance,
RFd ; X k ; a d RFd ; X d ; a d
Rd RFd ; X d ; a d or Rd or Rd
R
R
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
GEO STR
Failure of the ground Internal failure of structure
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Limit state is satisfied if the sum of the design values of the effects of destabilising actions
(Edst;d) is less than or equal to the sum of the design values of the effects of the stabilising
actions (Estb;d) together with any contribution through the resistance of the ground around
the structure (Td),
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
This limit state is satisfied if the design effect of the actions (Ed) is less than or equal to the
design resistance (Rd),
i.e. Ed ≤ R d
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
As with GEO limit state, the STR limit state is satisfied if the design effect of the actions (Ed)
is less than or equal to the design resistance (Rd),
i.e. Ed ≤ R d
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
This limit state is verified by checking that the sum of the design permanent and variable
destabilising vertical actions (Vdst;d) is less than or equal to the sum of the design stabilising
permanent vertical action (Gstb;d) and any additional resistance to uplift (Rd).
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
This limit state is verified by checking that the design total pore water pressure (udst;d) or
seepage force (Sdst;d) at the base of the soil column under investigation is less than or equal
to the total vertical stress (σstb;d) at the bottom of the column, or the submerged unit weight
(G'stb;d) of the same column.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Pq
W Pa
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Verify Ed ≤ Rd
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
The design approach followed reflects whether the safety is applied to the
material properties, the actions or the resistances.
Design Approach 2: A1 + M1 + R2
Design Approach 3: A* + M2 + R3
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
DA 1-1: A1 + M1 + R1 DA 1-2: A2 + M2 + R1
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Rd
Over-design factor:
Ed
Ed
Degree of utilisation:
Rd
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Ed
Ed
Rd Rd
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
(1)P The provisions of this Section shall apply to structures, which retain
ground comprising soil, rock or backfill and water. Material is retained if it
is kept at a slope steeper than it would eventually adopt if no structure
were present.
Retaining structures include all types of wall and support systems in
which structural elements have forces imposed by the retained material.
EN 1997-1:2004 §9.1.1(1)P
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Gravity walls:
bearing resistance failure of the soil below the base;
failure by sliding at the base;
failure by toppling;
Embedded walls:
failure by rotation or translation of the wall or parts thereof;
failure by lack of vertical equilibrium.
EN 1997-1:2004 §9.2(1)
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
EN 1997-1:2004 §9.3.2.2(2)
(3) Smaller values of Δa, including 0, may be used when the surface level is
specified to be controlled reliably throughout the appropriate execution
period.
EN 1997-1:2004 §9.3.2.2(3)
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Gravity walls
When Rankine’s conditions do not apply...
Charts for both horizontal and inclined retained surfaces are given in Annex C.
1.01
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
Ka
0.3
0.2
δ / φ' = 0
δ / φ' = 0.66
δ / φ' = 1
0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Design values of φ'
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Example
Surcharge, q = 20 kPa
1.8 m
Retained fill:
2
c' = 0; ' = 32 Ka h
4.0 m Ka q
= 18 kN/m3 = 22.4 kPa
1 = 6.2 kPa
2.0 m
3
= 26.7 kPa
1.0 m Foundation soil: 7.4 kPa
c' = 0; ' = 28
34.1 kPa
= 20 kN/m3
2.6 m
Check the overturning (EQU) and sliding (GEO) (using Design Approach 1) limit states.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Embedded walls
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Embedded walls
Cantilever wall – pressure distribution
q = 10kPa
Pq1
Pa1
d0 Pp1
d Ka(h+d0) Pq2
Kpd0 O
Kp(h+d)
Kad
Pa2 Pp2
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Embedded walls
Cantilever wall – simplified pressure distribution
Pq
Pa
Pp
h+d0
R 3
Kpd0
Ka(h+d0)
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Passive resistance
or
Pp ;k
Resistance: Pp ;d
Re
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Passive resistance
Design Approach
1 2 3
Combination 1 Combination 2
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Passive resistance
but what about for embedded walls?…
EN 1997-1:2004 §2.4.2
Note to (9)P
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Passive resistance
Pa
Pp
“uncertainty” in Pp = “uncertainty” in Pa
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Passive resistance
Design Approach
1 2 3
Combination Combination
1 2
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Conclusion (Recap…)
1. Intro to Eurocodes
2. Intro to Eurocode 7
3. Basis of Geotechnical Design
4. Geotechnical design by calculation
Actions, Ground properties, Characteristic values of geotechnical
parameters, Cautious estimate, Partial factors of safety, Design
values, Design effects of actions, Design resistances, Five Ultimate
limit states of Eurocode 7, Design Approaches (GEO), Over-design
factor and the degree of utilisation, single source principle
more…
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Conclusion (Recap…)
4. Geotechnical design by calculation (continued)
In other words…
Design to EN 1997 depends as much on Part 2 as Part 1.
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE
EUROCODE 7
Design to Eurocode 7
Dr Ian Smith, Edinburgh Napier University ICE Teesside Branch, NGG and IStructE