100% found this document useful (1 vote)
3K views8 pages

Chiong Murder Case

The Chiong murder case involved the kidnapping, rape, and murder of sisters Marijoy and Jacqueline Chiong in Cebu, Philippines in July 1997. Francisco Juan Larrañaga and six others were convicted of the crimes and sentenced to death by lethal injection in 2004. However, Larrañaga maintained his innocence and presented 42 alibi witnesses who testified he was in Quezon City at the time of the crimes. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction. In 2009, Larrañaga was transferred to a prison in Spain under a treaty allowing convicted persons to serve their sentence in their home country. The case raised questions about the strength of the evidence and fairness of the trial.

Uploaded by

Ei Bin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
3K views8 pages

Chiong Murder Case

The Chiong murder case involved the kidnapping, rape, and murder of sisters Marijoy and Jacqueline Chiong in Cebu, Philippines in July 1997. Francisco Juan Larrañaga and six others were convicted of the crimes and sentenced to death by lethal injection in 2004. However, Larrañaga maintained his innocence and presented 42 alibi witnesses who testified he was in Quezon City at the time of the crimes. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction. In 2009, Larrañaga was transferred to a prison in Spain under a treaty allowing convicted persons to serve their sentence in their home country. The case raised questions about the strength of the evidence and fairness of the trial.

Uploaded by

Ei Bin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Introduction
  • Trial
  • Verdict
  • Aftermath
  • References
  • Popular Culture

Chiong murder case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

People of the Philippines v. Francisco


Juan Larrañaga et al

Court Supreme Court of the Philippines

Full case People of the Philippines versus


name Francisco Juan Larrañaga alias "Paco";
Josman Aznar; Rowen Adlawan alias
"Wesley"; Alberto Cao alias "Allan
Pahak"; Ariel Balanasag; Davidson
Ariel Rusia alias "Tisoy Tagalog";
James Anthony Uy alias "Wangwang" and
James Andrew Uy alias "MM"

Decided February 3, 2004

Citation(s) G R. No. 138874-75

Case history

Prior Respondents found guilty beyond


action(s) reasonable doubt of simple kidnapping
and serious illegal detention and are
sentenced to suffer the penalty
of Reclusion perpetua (Criminal
Case No. CBU-45303 and 45304)

Appealed Regional Trial Court, Branch 7 Cebu


from City
Appealed to Court of Appeals of the Philippines

Subsequent Lobbied by Fair Trials


action(s) International to the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights, European
Union, Amnesty
International and Spanish
Government. Respondent Larrañaga was
transferred to Spain to observe his
prison term, by virtue of Treaty on
the Transfer of Sentenced Persons

Related Abolition of Capital punishment in the


action(s) Philippines

Ruling

Respondents are gulity beyond reasonable doubt of


the special complex crime of kidnapping and serious
illegal detention with homicide and rape and are
sentenced to suffer the penalty of death by lethal
injection, Motion for reconsideration were denied by
the Supreme Court En Banc

Court membership

Judges Hilario Davide Jr., Reynato


sitting Puno, Artemio Panganiban, Leonardo
Quisumbing, Consuelo
Ynares-Santiago, Angelina
Sandoval-Gutierrez, Antonio
Carpio, Alicia
Austria-Martinez, Renato
Corona, Conchita
Carpio-Morales, Romeo Callejo
Sr., Adolfo Azcuna, Dante
Tinga, Minita
Chico-Nazario, Cancio C. Garcia

Laws applied

Philippine criminal law


The Chiong murder case (People of the Philippines vs. Francisco Juan
Larrañaga et al.) was an incident on July 16, 1997 in Cebu, in which sisters
Marijoy and Jacqueline Chiong allegedly were kidnapped, raped, and
murdered.[1][2] Francisco Juan "Paco" Larrañaga (b. 1977), a man of
dual Filipino and Spanish citizenship was, along with six others, convicted of
murder, and sentenced to death by lethal injection on February 3,
2004. Capital punishment in the Philippines has since been abolished .

But with further studies and clarifications, this case was considered as flawed.

Trial[edit]
Prosecution[edit]
According to the prosecutors, at 10:00 p.m. on July 16, 1997, Larrañaga
and seven other defendants kidnapped the Chiong sisters near a mall on
the island of Cebu in the Philippines, raped them, and then threw one of the
sisters into a ravine (This was later disputed as there was no formal
identification of the body, and later thought not to be the body of one of the
sister's.) [3] The other sister was never found.[3][4][5][6] The prosecutors' case
against Larrañaga centered on the testimony of a co-defendant, David
Valiente Rusia.[5] In exchange for blanket immunity, he testified. The trial
court only permitted Larrañaga’s counsel to cross-examine Rusia for half an
hour, despite the fact that Rusia’s direct testimony lasted for days. In that
half-hour, Larrañaga’s counsel established that Rusia had lied to the
prosecution and the court concerning his prior convictions. While Rusia had
claimed he had never been convicted of crime, in fact he had a record of
burglary and forgery. Rusia fainted when confronted with this evidence.
Davidson Rusia is a convicted felon who was a gang member and was
sentenced to prison twice in the United States for other crimes.[7] Rusia
claimed that he was with Larrañaga in Ayala Center, Cebú early in the evening
of July 16, the evening Larrañaga says that he was at R&R Restaurant
in Quezon City with his friends. Rusia was not known to Larrañaga[7] and only
appeared as a “state witness” 10 months after the event.

Defense[edit]
Forty-two witnesses,[3] including Larrañaga’s teachers and classmates at
the Center for Culinary Arts (CCA) in Quezon City, testified under oath that
he was in Quezon City, when the crime is said to have taken place
in Cebu.[5][8][9] However, the trial court considered these testimonies
irrelevant, rejecting these as coming from "friends of the accused," and they
were not admitted.[1][3][5][6][8] During his trial in the Cebu Regional Trial
Court (RTC) Branch 7, defense lawyers sought to present evidence of his
whereabouts on the evening of the crime—that Larrañaga, at that time 19
years old, was at a party at the R&R Restaurant along Katipunan Avenue,
Quezon City, and stayed there until early morning the following day. After the
party, the logbook of the security guard at Larrañaga's condominium indicates
that Larrañaga returned to his Quezon City condominium at 2:45 a.m.[3]

Rowena Bautista, an instructor and chef at the culinary center, said


Larrañaga was in school from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and saw him again at
about 6:30 p.m on July 16.[3] The school’s registrar, Caroline Calleja, said she
proctored a two-hour exam where Larrañaga was present from 1:30 p.m.
Larrañaga attended his second round of midterm exams on July 17
commencing at 8 a.m. Only then did Larrañaga leave for Cebu in the late
afternoon of July 17, 1997.

Airline and airport personnel also came to court with their flight records,
indicating that Larrañaga did not take any flight on July 16, 1997, nor was
he on board any chartered aircraft that landed in or departed from Cebu
during the relevant dates, except the 5 p.m. PAL flight on July 17, 1997
from Manila to Cebu.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused without
reasonable doubt.

Verdict[edit]
The seven co-defendants were convicted of murder and sentenced to death
by lethal injection on February 3, 2004.[4][5][8]

Larrañaga's counsels Felicitas Aquino Arroyo and Sandra Marie Olaso Coronel
urged the high court to admit the amicus curiae from the Basque Bar Council
(BBC), Barcelona Bar Associations (BBA) and Bar Association of Madrid.[5] The
three organizations expressed their interests in the case of Larrañaga since he
was a "Spanish citizen with origins in the Basque Country, and therefore a
member of the European Union." The BBA mentioned that the execution of a
Spanish citizen would be in breach of the violation of the principle
of reciprocity in international law, noting that if a Filipino citizen is found
guilty in Spain, no Spanish court would have imposed the death penalty, nor
would have allowed him extradited to any country imposing capital
punishment.[10] Former Ambassador Sedfrey Ordóñez claims he is the victim
of a mistrial.

Fair Trials International (FTI), an NGO working on behalf of those who face a
miscarriage of justice in a country other than their own, entered
an amicus brief which was submitted to the Supreme Court of the
Philippines by the European Commission's Manila
delegate.[3] The amicus argued that under both international and Philippine
law, Larrañaga had been the subject of an unfair trial and had never been
given the opportunity to show his innocence. FTI has since represented
Larrañaga before the United Nations, appealing against injustice in the
Philippines. Sarah de Mas, spokesperson for FTI who brought the case to the
attention of the European Parliament and successive presidencies of the
European Union,[3] stated that Larrañaga had served a lengthy sentence for
a crime he could not have committed.

Aftermath[edit]
Years after the verdict, questions still linger, and there is dissatisfaction with
the outcome of events on both sides.[6][11][12][13]

Abolition of the death penalty[edit]


On June 24, 2006, capital punishment was abolished in the
Philippines.[3][5][14]

Transfer of Larrañaga to Spain[edit]


On December 3, 2007, Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Ángel
Moratinos stated that Spain will be “happy” if Larrañaga spends his life
sentence in a jail "here" as the Treaty on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons
comes into force: “We don’t know when this will happen. We have no time
period. We feel happy that Mr. Larrañaga can come back with this treaty.” The
treaty, which will allow convicted persons of either country to return to his
home country and spend his sentence there, was ratified by the
Philippines—17 affirmative and two abstentions—on November 26. The
Philippines has signed similar treaties with Canada, Cuba, Hong Kong,
and Thailand.[15]

Larrañaga is the son of Spanish pelotari Manuel Larrañaga and Filipino


Margarita González,[1][8] and, through his mother, is a member of the
influential Osmeña clan of Cebu. Philippine Senator Miriam
Defensor-Santiago said that, "Larrañaga's case could be covered by the treaty
only if the Supreme Court issued a final ruling on his conviction, which
remained on appeal before the high tribunal".[5][16]

In September 2009, the Department of Justice approved Larrañaga's transfer


to a Spanish prison. Thelma Chiong, the mother of the victims, expressed shock
over the decision, saying that, despite Larrañaga's Spanish citizenship, "If you
committed a crime in the Philippines, you are jailed in the
Philippines,"[17] despite the fact that this would constitute a breach of the
treaty and thus of international law. Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Raúl
González himself expressed concern that the Philippines might be branded
a rogue state if it did not comply with the provisions of the treaty.[4]

Larrañaga, escorted by two Spanish Interpol agents,[11] left for Spain on


October 6, 2009.[2][18] His good behavior at the New Bilibid Prison was taken
into consideration, and he will serve the rest of his sentence at the Madrid
Central Penitentiary at Soto del Real.[2] According to Philippine Justice
Secretary Agnes Devanadera, Philippine law will continue to be observed for
the remainder of Larrañaga's prison term.[19] Dionisio Chiong, the father of
the victims, said in Cebuano, “I’m tired. The family is tired of this case. We
fought to get a conviction but the government clearly wanted to bring him to
Spain. We can’t beat the government.”[11] He also expressed resentment that
he and his wife only learned about Larrañaga's departure through the
media.[13]

Less than a week after Larrañaga's transfer, two Filipinos incarcerated in the
Philippines stated their wish to also serve the rest of their sentences in Spain
under the provisions of the treaty.[15] A supporter of Larrañaga has also
sought a reinvestigation of the murder case in order to clear the six other
convicts.[20]

Thelma Chiong expressed the possibility of her and her husband, Dionisio,
visiting Larrañaga in Spain. Larrañaga, born in 1977, will be 61 when he is
released.[13]

Popular culture[edit]
Film Adaptations

 The episode of the untold story of Chiong Sisters for the 1998 TV
Drama series "Katapat: Mayor Fred Lim" on ABS CBN.
 Give Up Tomorrow, 2011 documentary film by Michael Collins and
Marty Syjuco

 Jacqueline Comes Home (The Chiong Story), 2018 biographical film


directed by Ysabelle Peach Caparas starring Meg Imperial and Donnalyn
Bartolome as the Chiong sisters

References[edit]
1. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Filipinas conmuta la pena capital de Larrañaga por cadena
perpetua · ELPAÍS.com". Elpais.com. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

2. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Larrañaga será trasladado a la cárcel de Soto del Real cuando
aterrice en España · ELPAÍS.com". Elpais.com. 2010-07-14.
Retrieved 2010-07-26.

3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i "Fair Trials International: Cases: Francisco Juan


Larrañaga (Paco)". Fairtrials.net. Archived from the original on 2009-07-10.
Retrieved 2010-07-26.

4. ^ Jump up to:a b c "'RP obliged to transfer rapist' - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News


for Filipinos". Newsinfo.inquirer.net. Archived from the original on 2009-09-09.
Retrieved 2010-07-26.

5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h "The Chiong Sisters Rape-Murder Case - 9/05/09".


Services.inquirer.net. Archived from the original on 2009-09-09.
Retrieved 2010-07-26.

6. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Trace of violence: The Chiong murder case - Public Affairs -
GMANews.TV - Official Website of GMA News and Public Affairs - Latest Philippine
News". GMANews.TV. Retrieved 2010-07-26.
7. ^ Jump up to:a b “”. "Case Unclosed "The Chiong murder case"". YouTube.
Retrieved 2010-07-26.

8. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Pide un juicio justo para Paco Larrañaga, español condenado a
muerte en Filipinas". HazteOir.org. 2005-04-18. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

9. Jump up^ “”. "Framed for Murder? Filipino Paco Larrañaga Speaks from Jail".
YouTube. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

10. Jump up^ The EU itself forbids capital punishment and its abolition is a
requirement for any applicant state.

11. ^ Jump up to:a b c [1] Archived October 8, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.

12. Jump up^ Editorial cartoon from the Sun.Star[permanent dead link]

13. ^ Jump up to:a b c [2] Archived October 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.

14. Jump up^ "Sun.Star Cebu - Arroyo kills death law". Sunstar.com.ph. 2006-06-25.
Archived from the original on 2008-06-17. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

15. ^ Jump up
to:a b https://web.archive.org/web/20091011154312/http://www3.sunstar.com.
ph/cebu/2-%E2%80%98-exchange%E2%80%99-paco. Archived from the
original on October 11, 2009. Retrieved October 9, 2009. Missing or
empty |title= (help)

16. Jump up^ Inquirer.net, Spaniard might be first beneficiary in prisons exchange
pact ArchivedJune 10, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.

17. Jump up^ "Convict in Chiong rape-murders to be transferred to Spain - Nation -


GMANews.TV - Official Website of GMA News and Public Affairs - Latest Philippine
News". GMANews.TV. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

18. Jump up^ [3][dead link]

19. Jump up^ "Convicted rapist Larrañaga leaves for Spain | The Philippine Star >>
News >> Headlines". Philstar.com. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

20. Jump up^ "'After Paco, give break to six Chiong convicts' - INQUIRER.net,
Philippine News for Filipinos". Globalnation.inquirer.net. 2006-04-16. Archived
from the original on 2012-07-13. Retrieved 2010-07-26.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The abolition of capital punishment in the Philippines had profound societal and legal impacts, especially evident in cases like the Chiong murder case. Legally, it transitioned sentences from death to reclusion perpetua, as seen with Larrañaga and his co-defendants, aligning with global human rights norms and reducing potential wrongful executions . Societally, it diminished the contentiousness associated with capital punishment, allowing for a more rehabilitative justice system. However, it also sparked debate on the adequacy of life sentences for severe crimes, challenging the balance of justice and victims’ families seeking closure .

Francisco Juan Larrañaga and his co-defendants were convicted largely based on the testimony of co-defendant David Valiente Rusia, who was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony against them . Although Larrañaga provided multiple alibis, including testimonies from 42 witnesses such as teachers and classmates asserting he was in Quezon City on the day of the crime, the court dismissed these alibis as irrelevant and biased due to their connection to Larrañaga . Circumstantial evidence and the powerful testimonies against him overshadowed the defense's arguments, resulting in their conviction .

International organizations such as Fair Trials International and Amnesty International lobbied against the perceived miscarriage of justice in Larrañaga’s trial, advocating on his behalf before the United Nations and European Commission, which publicly supported his rights as a Spanish national . Their involvement highlighted international standards of fair trials, pressuring for his transfer to a Spanish prison due to his dual citizenship under the Treaty on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, which eventually occurred in 2009 . Although the Supreme Court did not overturn his conviction, the international advocacy helped shift his sentence location to Spain, improving prison conditions for Larrañaga .

The validity of evidence in the Chiong murder case was heavily contested. One point of contention was the reliance on testimony from co-defendant David Valiente Rusia, despite inconsistencies and his admitted criminal history; further, his credibility was questioned due to immunity in exchange for his testimony . Another key issue was the rejection of 42 alibi testimonies from credible sources such as teachers, classmates, and airline staff that suggested Larrañaga was not present at the crime scene . Additionally, lack of formal identification of the bodies raised questions about the evidence supporting the prosecution’s narrative .

The media played a significant role in shaping public perception of the Chiong murder case by extensively covering the trial and subsequent controversies. The adaptation of the story into films and documentaries, such as "Give Up Tomorrow," brought international attention to the perceived injustices within the case, influencing public opinion to view the trial as flawed and biased . This attention helped garner support from human rights organizations and kept scrutiny on the Philippine judicial process, indirectly influencing the decision to transfer Larrañaga to Spain .

The treaty on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons allowed Larrañaga, a dual citizen, to serve his remaining sentence in Spain instead of the Philippines. This move was significant as it demonstrated a recognition of international citizenship rights, aligning with the European Union’s opposition to capital punishment . It established a precedent for how such treaties could be applied for other convicts, emphasizing reciprocal legal rights in international law . The implications for the Philippines included potential diplomatic pressure and the balancing of national legal sovereignty against international human rights norms .

Citizenship and international agreements played a crucial role in shaping the final disposition of Larrañaga's sentence. His Spanish citizenship, together with the EU's anti-death penalty stance, invoked a broader legal discourse against his execution, supported by international entities who advocated for a transfer as per the Treaty on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons . This agreement allowed Larrañaga to be transferred to a Spanish prison, underlining the impact of dual citizenship on diplomatic negotiations and sentencing outcomes, reflecting how international legal frameworks can influence national judicial decisions .

The defense faced significant procedural challenges during the Chiong murder trial, impacting the trial's fairness. Key challenges included restricted cross-examination of the prosecution's primary witness, David Valiente Rusia, limited to half an hour despite his extensive direct testimony . Additionally, the trial court dismissed the defense's 42 alibi witnesses, undermining their potential exculpatory evidence . These procedural constraints limited the defense’s ability to challenge prosecution claims adequately and contributed to perceptions of an unfair trial, eventually leading to international criticism and appeals .

The defense questioned the credibility of David Valiente Rusia, highlighting inconsistencies and his admitted prior criminal convictions for burglary and forgery, which he falsely denied during testimony . The defense pointed out that Rusia fainted when confronted with evidence of his criminal past, implying his unreliability as a witness . Additionally, Rusia's late emergence as a "state witness" ten months after the alleged crime and his contradictory accounts of the events were leveraged to challenge the validity of his testimony during the trial .

Cultural and familial influences significantly shaped defense strategies and perceptions in the Chiong murder case. Larrañaga's dual citizenship and ties to the influential Osmeña clan in Cebu were leveraged to gain support and highlight alleged miscarriages of justice under a supposedly biased Philippines legal system, casting him as an emblematic victim of international legal dichotomy . Defense narratives likely emphasized his cultural ties to accentuate his character and credibility against accusations of bias towards a privileged background. This duality of cultural identity played into both legal tactics and public perceptions, driving advocacy at an international level .

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Seal_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_Republic_of_the_Philippines.svg)Chiong murder case 
Fro
Appealed to Court of Appeals of the Philippines  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_Philippines) (https
The Chiong murder case (People of the Philippines vs. Francisco Juan 
Larrañaga et al.) was an incident on July 16, 1997 in C
Forty-two witnesses,[3]  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiong_murder_case#cite_note-fti-3)including Larrañaga’s teachers and
was a "Spanish citizen  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_nationality_law)with origins in the Basque Country, (https://e
treaty, which will allow convicted persons of either country to return to his 
home country and spend his sentence there, was
sought a reinvestigation of the murder case in order to clear the six other 
convicts.[20]  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch
7. 
^ Jump up  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiong_murder_case#cite_ref-2forpaco_15-0)to:a  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

You might also like