Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics: Professor S. Suresh
Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics: Professor S. Suresh
Professor S. Suresh
Elastic Plastic
Fracture
Previously, we have analyzed problems in which the plastic zone
was small compared to the specimen dimensions (small scale
yielding). In today’s lecture we present techniques for analyzing
situations in which there can be large scale yielding, and
determine expressions for the stress components inside the
plastic zone. We will begin with a discussion of the J integral.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 1
Derivation
J Integral
J
The integral is a line integral (path-independent) around the
crack tip. It has enormous significance in elastic-plastic fracture
mechanics. Key Reference: J. R. Rice, Journal of Applied
Mechanics, 1968.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 2
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 3
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
a = crack length.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 4
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 5
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
J
For proportional loading 2 deformation theory and 2 flow J
theory (incremental theory of plasticity) give results that are
comparable (i.e. for monotonic loading, stationary cracks).
Not appropriate for situations where significant unloading occurs.
uM � ue + uapp
This represents the sum of the stored strain potential energy and
the potential energy of the applied loading.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 6
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
Z Z
uM � wdA , T � uds
A S
In the previous integral:
w � strain energy density (per unit volume); recall that
@w
�ij � @� :
ij
dA an element of cross section A within S .
We now evaluate the derivative of the mechanical potential
energy, uM, with respect to crack length.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 7
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
, duM
�
Z �
@ u
wdy , T � @xds
�
da S
�J
J represents the rate of change of net potential energy with
respect to crack advance (per unit thickness of crack front) for a
non-linear elastic solid.J also can be thought of as the energy
flow into the crack tip. Thus, J is a measure of the singularity
strength at the crack tip for the case of elastic-plastic material
response.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 8
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
J �G�, � � dUM
� , da
d PE
da
K 2,
� E 1,� 2�
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 9
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 10
Derivation
J Integral
Continued
Jalong S1 � Jalong S2
The J Integral is independent of the path around the crack tip.
If S2 is in elastic material,
K 2,
JS2 � E 1 , � 2�
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 11
HRR field
behavior).
�n
� �� � �
�0 �0
� = material constant, �0 = reference yield strength, n = strain
hardening exponent, �0 � reference yield strain � �0�E .
For linear elastic material n � 1, for perfectly plastic response
n � 1.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 12
Continued
HRR field
With these assumptions, the crack tip fields (HRR field) can be
derived. (Ref: J.W. Hutchinson, JMPS, 1968 and J.R. Rice and
1
�
J � n+1
�ij � �0 �� � I r �~ij ��; n�
0 0 n
�
J � +1
�ij � ��0 �� � I r �~ij ��; n�
n
n
0 0 n
�
J � +1
n
n
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 15
CTOD
J
�t � dn �
0
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 16
CTOD
J J
�t � dn � � �
0 0
For Small Scale Yielding (SSY)
K 2,
J � E 1,�
I 2�
K 2
�t � dn E �
I
,
1 , � 2
�
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 17
CTOD
Importance/Applications of CTOD:
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 18
J-Dominance
Just as for the K field, there is a domain of validity for the HRR
J
( -based) fields.
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 19
J-Dominance
1
0 � rp
4
For
than 25 times the CTOD or � 25 � J��0. The variation in stress
�
SMA c
2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 20
J-Dominance
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 21
K and
J-Dominance
p � � 350
Consider a low strength steel with 0 MPa,
K � 250
Ic MPa m and E � 210 GPa. What are the Minimum
K J
specimen size requirements for valid Ic and Ic
measurements?
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 22
K-Dominance
a; b; t � 1:28 m! �� 50 inches�
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 23
J-Dominance
J
For Ic testing, the condition requires that for a deeply cracked
compact tension or bend specimen:
J Ic K Ic
b � 25 � � 25 E � 1 , ,
� 2
�
0 0
b � 0:02 m
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 24
J-Dominance
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 24
J-Dominance
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 25
J-Dominance
�
SMA c 2000 MIT Fatigue and Fracture 26