Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Rock Mass -
Schist
Granite
1
NKVE
2
ROCK CYCLE
3
INTRODUCTION
• A major deficiency of laboratory testing of rock
specimens is that the specimens are limited in size and
therefore represent a very small and highly selective
sample of the rock mass from which they were removed.
6
Discontinuities
7
Cont’d
a) Sedimentary
b) Igneous
c) Metamorphic
8
Sedimentary
iii. Fault
9
Horizontal bedding
10
Fault
11
Fold
12
Igneous
13
Joint set has same orientation
14
Sheet jointing in granite - sometimes
referred to as ‘onion skin’ joints
15
Metamorphic
• Temperature and pressure ~
recrystalliztion mineral ~ foliation
16
Orientation of platy mineral grains with respect to
direction to highest pressure during metamorphism
17
Discontinuity data
18
Geological Mapping
August October
2000 2001
2002 August
2003
June February
2004 2005
Field-sketch to show the approximate extend of the moving blocks within the major
failure
CH 23+900 – CH24+400 (The major
failure)
CH 23+900 – CH24+400
(The major failure)
27
Figure 9.3 The orientation of a discontinuity in slope
28
Summary: effect of discontinuities
on rock mass properties
• Intact rock (lab test) strength affected by
mineral arrangement, eg. Cleavage.
29
Discontinuity Measurement
• Scan line mapping
• Random mapping
31
Discontinuity Measurement
• The important part of a rock slope analysis is the
systematic collection of geological data.
33
Cont’d
• A scanline is a line set on the surface of the rock mass, and the survey
consists of recording the information about the discontinuities that
intersect this line.
36
Figure 9.6 The discontinuity survey data sheet
37
Cont’d
38
Figure 9.7 Plot of structural features using the program DIPS
39
Rock Quality Designation Index (RQD)
41
Cont’d
• When using diamond drill core, care must be taken to ensure that
fractures, which have been caused by handling or the drilling
process, are identified and ignored when determining the value
of RQD.
• Cording and Deere (1972), Merritt (1972) and Deere and Deere
(1988) attempted to relate RQD to Terzaghi's rock load factors
and to rockbolt requirements in tunnels.
44
Geomechanics Classification
• Bieniawski (1976) published the details of a rock mass
classification called the Geomechanics Classification or
the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system.
3. Spacing of discontinuities.
4. Condition of discontinuities.
5. Groundwater conditions.
6. Orientation of discontinuities.
46
The following example illustrates the use of these
tables to arrive at an RMR value.
47
Answer
• The RMR value for the example under
consideration is determined as follows:
48
Tunnel drive with dip and drive against dip
49
Cont’d
51
Cont’d
53
Cont’d
55
Cont’d
• (2)
• Where:
• The 'friction angles' (given in Table 9.3) are a little below the
residual strength values for most clays, and are possibly
down-graded by the fact that these clay bands or fillings may tend
to consolidate during shear, at least if normal consolidation or if
softening and swelling has occurred.
• Part of the reason for this may be that the orientations of many types of
excavations can be, and normally are, adjusted to avoid the maximum effect
of unfavorably oriented major joints.
• However, this choice is not available in the case of tunnels, and more than
half the case records were in this category.
• The parameters Jn, Jr and Ja appear to play a more important role than
orientation, because the number of joint sets determines the degree of
freedom for block movement (if any), and the frictional and dilational
characteristics can vary more than the down-dip gravitational component of
unfavorably oriented joints.
• If joint orientations had been included the classification would have been
less general, and its essential simplicity lost.
61
Example:
Question
A 15 m span crusher chamber for permanent
underground mine is to be excavated in a norite at a
depth of 2,100 m below surface. The rock mass contains
two sets of joints controlling stability. These joints are
undulating, rough and unweathered with very minor
surface staining. RQD values range from 85% to 95%
and laboratory tests on core samples of intact rock give
an average uniaxial compressive strength of 170
MPa. The principal stress directions are approximately
vertical and horizontal and the magnitude of the
horizontal principal stress is approximately 1.5 times
that of the vertical principal stress. The rock mass is
locally damp but there is no evidence of flowing
water. 62
Answer:
• The numerical value of RQD is used directly in the calculation of Q and, for this rock
mass, an average value of 90 will be used.
• Table 9.3.2 shows that, for two joint sets, the joint set number, Jn = 4.
• For rough or irregular joints which are undulating, Table 9.3.3 gives a joint roughness
number of Jr = 3.
• Table 9.3.4 gives the joint alteration number, Ja = 1.0, for unaltered joint walls with
surface staining only.
• Table 9.3.5 shows that, for an excavation with minor inflow, the joint water reduction
factor, Jw = 1.0.
• For a depth below surface of 2,100 m the overburden stress will be approximately 57
MPa and, in this case, the major principal stress s1 = 85 MPa.
• Since the uniaxial compressive strength of the norite is approximately 170 MPa, this
gives a ratio of sc / s1= 2.
• Table 9.3.6 shows that, for competent rock with rock stress problems, this value of sc
/ s1 can be expected to produce heavy rock burst conditions and that the value of
SRF should lie between 10 and 20. A value of SRF = 15 will be assumed for this
calculation. Using these values gives:
63
Cont’d
64
The value of ESR is related to the intended use of the excavation
and to the degree of security which is demanded of the support
system installed to maintain the stability of the excavation. Barton
et al (1974) suggest the following values:
65
Table 9.3 Classification of individual parameters used in the Tunneling Quality Index, Q
66
Table 9.3(cont'd.) Classification of individual parameters used in the Tunneling Quality Index, Q (After Barton et al
1974)
67
Table 9.3 (cont'd.) Classification of individual parameters in the Tunneling Quality
Index, Q (After Barton et al 1974)
68
Cont’d
• Løset (1992) suggests that, for rocks with 4 < Q < 30, blasting
damage will result in the creation of new ‘joints’ with a consequent
local reduction in the value of Q for the rock surrounding the
excavation.
70
Cont’d
• Assuming that the RQD value for the distressed rock around the
crusher chamber drops to 50 %, the resulting value of Q = 2.9.
71
Cont’d
72
Figure 9.11 Estimated support categories based on the
tunneling quality index, Q (After Grimstad and Barton,
1993, reproduced from Palmstrom and Broch, 2006)
73
Table 9.4 Shear strength of filled discontinuities and filling materials (After Barton 1974)
74
Structurally Controlled Instability
• Tunnels
• Slopes
75
Tunnels
76
77
Rock Slope Assessment
• The discontinuity data from the scanline survey of rock
slope will analysis.
1. Pole density
2. Discontinuity sets
78
Plotting Poles
• Poles can be plotted on the polar stereonet (Figure 9.18) on which the dip direction is
indicated on the periphery of the circle, and the dip is measured along radial lines with
zero degrees at the center.
• It should be noted that the stereonet shown on Figure 9.18 is the lower hemisphere
plot in which the dip direction scale starts at the bot-tom of the circle and increases in
a clockwise direction, with the north arrow corresponding to the dip direction of 1800.
• The reason for set-ting up the scale in this manner is that if the field readings, as
measured with a structural com-pass, are plotted directly on the stereonet, the poles
are correctly plotted on the lower hemi-sphere plot.
• The procedure for plotting poles is to lay a sheet of tracing paper on the printed polar
net and mark the north direction and each quadrant position around the edge of the
outer circle.
• A mark is then made to show the pole that represents the orientation of each
discontinuity as defined by its dip and dip direction.
• Poles for shallow dipping discontinuities lie close to the center of the circle, and poles
of steeply dipping discontinuities lie close to the periphery of the circle.
79
Step of ploting pole using
equal-area polar net : eg. 220º/70º
80
Step of ploting pole using equal
area equatorial net: eg. 220º/70º
81
Contouring Pole Concentrations
• Concentrations of pole orientations can be identified using a
counting net such as that shown in Figure 9.19.
• The plotting procedure for great circles consists of the following steps:
1. Lay a piece of tracing paper on the net with a thumbtack through the center point so
that the tracing paper can be rotated on the net.
3. Locate the dip direction of the plane on the scale around the circumference of the net
and mark this point on the tracing paper. Note that the dip direction scale on the equatorial
net for plotting great circles starts at the north point at the top of the circle and increases in
a clockwise direction.
4. Rotate the tracing paper until the dip direction mark coincides with one of the horizontal
axes of the net, that is, the 900 or 1800 points of the dip direction scale.
5. Locate the arc on the net corresponding to the dip of the plane and trace this arc on to
the paper. Note that a horizontal plane has a great circle at the circumference of the net,
and a vertical plane is represented by a straight line passing through the center of -the net.
6. Rotate the tracing paper so that the two north points coincide and the great circle is
oriented correctly. 83
Step of ploting great circle: eg.
220º/70º
84
Lines of Intersection
• The intersection of two planes is a straight line, which defines the direction
of sliding of a wedge formed by these two planes.
2. Draw a line from the center of the net through the point of intersection
and extend it to the circumference of the net.
3. The trend of the line of intersection is given by the position where the
line drawn in step 2 intersects the scale on the circumference of the net.
4. Rotate the tracing paper until the line drawn in step 2 lies over one of the
hori-zontal axes of the net (dip direction 90° or 180°). The plunge of the line
intersection is read off the scale on the horizontal axis, with a horizontal
plunge having a point of intersection at the circumference and a vertical
plunge at the center of the net. 85
Step of ploting lines of
intersection: eg. 220º/70º
86
Figure 9.18 Equal-area polar net for plotting poles
87
Figure 9.19 Kalsbeek counting net
for contouring pole concentrations
88
Figure 9.20 Equal-area equatorial net
for plotting poles and great circles
89
Table 9.5: Mode of slope failures
based on discontinuity
i. The discontinuities dip direction must lie between ±10° of slope dip direction (opposite direction).
ii.
i. Dip direction lie within ± 200 from the “design slope” dip direction.
ii. ψf > ψp > φ (slope angle>plane angle>friction angle)
Planar
iii. Release surfaces must be present to define the lateral boundaries of the
slide.
i. The discontinuities dip direction must lie between ±10° of slope dip
direction (opposite direction).
Toppling
ii.
90
Figure 9.21 The stereographic plot of potential instability analysis and types of failure mode (Hoek and Bray, 1981)
91
Plane Failure
92
Wedge Failure
93
Toppling Failure
94
Limit Equilibrium Models
• The stability of rock slopes for the
geological conditions depends on the
shear strength generated along the sliding
surface. For all shear type failures, the
rock can assumed to be a Mohr-Coulomb
material in which the shear strength is
expressed in terms of the cohesion c and
friction angle .
• For a sliding surface on which there is an
effective normal stress, acting, the shear
strength developed on this surface is
given by;
95
Limit Equilibrium Models
• The stability of rock slopes for the
geological conditions depends on the
shear strength generated along the sliding
surface. For all shear type failures, the
rock can assumed to be a Mohr-Coulomb
material in which the shear strength is
expressed in terms of the cohesion c and
friction angle .
• For a sliding surface on which there is an
effective normal stress, acting, the shear
strength developed on this surface is
given by;
96
is dip of sliding surface
A is area of sliding surface
W is weight of block lying
above sliding surface.
and
Shear stress,
97
The stability of rock slope:
98
3 slope conditions;
Where;
100
For case (a), the weight of sliding block W is;
Where;
For case (b), the weight of sliding block W is;
Driving force = Resisting force
101
The water forces acting in the tension crack,
V, and on the sliding plane,
U, are as follows:
Where;
102
Slope remedial
Where;
Driving force = Resisting force
103
Example geometry assumed for the
two-dimensional analysis of the slope
104
Factor of Safety for Planar Mode
• The two models are defined in:
1. Figure 9.23
2. Figure 9.24.
105
Figure 9.23 Factor of Safety calculation for a slope with no tension crack
106
Figure 9.24 Factor of Safety calculation for
a slope with a water-filled tension crack
107
Table 9.6 The Symbols and dimensions
used in these models are as follows
108
Factor of Safety for Wedge Mode
Figure 9.25 The important data for analyzing wedge failure
109
Cont’d
• Given:
• ψb = dip angle for plane b ψ5= dip angle for wedge intersection
110