Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comments and Response To Comments (Sawla-Laska Lot - I - Hyd
Comments and Response To Comments (Sawla-Laska Lot - I - Hyd
3 Section 4.2, Open You have stated that unpaved triangular side ditch is It is included on the report as appendix 4.3 following your
Channel Design provided along the project road where the longitudinal comment.
slope is less than 5% and paved one where the slope
exceeds 5%. And paved one where the slope exceeds
5%. However, you haven't attached the side ditch
1
No. Reference Comments Response to Comments
schedule station wise.
Section 4.5, It is stated that all minor drainage structures will be
Condition Survey of demolished due to geometric conditions and hydraulic Likely, minor drainage structures inventory sheet included on the
4
Drainage Structures, insufficiency. Please be advised to include the existing report as appendix 4.2.
Page 37 drainage structures inventory data in the final report.
It is indicated that there is no significant scour problem
observed at the existing bridge of the project but due to
Section 4.6.1, Scour Protection work on the right side of the river provided in the form of
high-energy condition of the incoming water at bridge
5 Determination Page retaining wall to protect the bank from high energy impact
upstream side bank, it is necessary to protect the bank
37 of the incoming water.
approaching to the bridge. What type of protection
measures? Please specify clearly.
Section 4.6.2,
Incorporate the procedures and computations of back Back water computation procedures are incorporated on the final
6 Backwater due to
water effect. report following your comment.
constriction Page 38
Section 5.1, It has been stated that the existing bridge is structurally
Condition and in good condition. How did you come up with this
7
description of conclusion? Did you get the previous design data of
Existing Structure the bridge and make analysis? Please clarify.