You are on page 1of 1

BP HSE COMMUNICATION – Lessons Learned Report

• Some platform crew ignored evacuation orders from


Type of Incident: Offshore Platform Fire & Spill shore, necessitating emergency team mission
Business/Performance
Unit: Egypt – GUPCO Joint Venture What Went Well:
Country: Egypt • Platform ESD worked well once activated
Location of Incident: October Complex Platform • Platform fire deluge system worked well
Ras Shukheir, Egypt • Emergency team response coordination efforts
Date of Incident: 6 May 2001
Lessons Learned & Actions Underway:
Brief Account of Incident: A fire occurred on the GUPCO • GUPCO’s operational HSE efforts had been focused
“October” offshore production complex in the Gulf of on developing & upgrading Safe Systems of Work
Suez during a planned maintenance activity to replace a procedures and were not emphasizing assurance of use
Safety Relief Valve (SRV) on the 103 Production • The existing offshore organizational structure provided
Separator. There were no direct injuries from the initial no clear line of accountability for overall platform
incident but a large number of staff required first aid management – a new OIM development program
treatment after being involved in the emergency including UK training sessions has now been
response and fire fighting efforts. implemented for all major offshore complexes
• Revised Permit to Work and Isolation Procedures
The fire caused extensive damage to one area of the under development were implemented during
production facility, including the glycol reboiler skid, an operations resumption efforts and have substantially
aerial cooler for a gas lift compressor and extensive improved control and accountability offshore
damage to localized piping and wiring. There was an • GUPCO’s Management Team has reviewed their
environmental impact that came from an estimated assurance process to identify an appropriate frequency
release of 50 barrels of oil to the Gulf of Suez during the for external SMS audits for each major installation
fire. The spill fully dissipated and is not considered to • GUPCO has commenced providing an extensive
have caused any damage to any environmentally offshore operator competency training programme
sensitive areas. provided by Baker International for offshore staff
• GUPCO requested assistance from BP to conduct a
The platform was shut down for a total of 18 days with Major Hazard Review Study, now under progress
lost production of over 60,000 BOPD and remained at
less than full production rates for approximately six Key Message: The effectiveness of any management system is
months after the event. only proportional to the extent it is utilized. Having a structured,
scheduled assurance process is also vital
Potential Outcome: The extent of the platform damage
could have been much worse with significantly greater
loss of production capability. Workers on board the
platform during and after the incident could have
suffered more serious injury.

What Went Wrong:


• Isolation procedures were not being fully utilized to
safely isolate the vessel under maintenance
• No evidence of lockout/tagout systems in use
• Platform personnel did not feel empowered to
activate ESD system when initial leak started
• Operator error resulted in live production fluids
entering vessel being maintained with Pressure
Safety Valves removed
• MOC process not effective, P&ID’s outdated
• Personnel on Board (POB) info was inaccurate

You might also like