An offshore platform fire and spill occurred in Egypt due to operator error during a planned maintenance activity. While the emergency response efforts went well, the investigation found that operational HSE efforts had focused on developing procedures but not on ensuring their use. As a result, key safety systems like lock-out/tag-out were not fully utilized. Several lessons were learned, including the need for a clear line of accountability and a structured assurance process to verify that safety management systems are effectively implemented offshore. Actions are now being taken to improve control, accountability, training, and auditing of safety procedures.
An offshore platform fire and spill occurred in Egypt due to operator error during a planned maintenance activity. While the emergency response efforts went well, the investigation found that operational HSE efforts had focused on developing procedures but not on ensuring their use. As a result, key safety systems like lock-out/tag-out were not fully utilized. Several lessons were learned, including the need for a clear line of accountability and a structured assurance process to verify that safety management systems are effectively implemented offshore. Actions are now being taken to improve control, accountability, training, and auditing of safety procedures.
An offshore platform fire and spill occurred in Egypt due to operator error during a planned maintenance activity. While the emergency response efforts went well, the investigation found that operational HSE efforts had focused on developing procedures but not on ensuring their use. As a result, key safety systems like lock-out/tag-out were not fully utilized. Several lessons were learned, including the need for a clear line of accountability and a structured assurance process to verify that safety management systems are effectively implemented offshore. Actions are now being taken to improve control, accountability, training, and auditing of safety procedures.
• Some platform crew ignored evacuation orders from
Type of Incident: Offshore Platform Fire & Spill shore, necessitating emergency team mission Business/Performance Unit: Egypt – GUPCO Joint Venture What Went Well: Country: Egypt • Platform ESD worked well once activated Location of Incident: October Complex Platform • Platform fire deluge system worked well Ras Shukheir, Egypt • Emergency team response coordination efforts Date of Incident: 6 May 2001 Lessons Learned & Actions Underway: Brief Account of Incident: A fire occurred on the GUPCO • GUPCO’s operational HSE efforts had been focused “October” offshore production complex in the Gulf of on developing & upgrading Safe Systems of Work Suez during a planned maintenance activity to replace a procedures and were not emphasizing assurance of use Safety Relief Valve (SRV) on the 103 Production • The existing offshore organizational structure provided Separator. There were no direct injuries from the initial no clear line of accountability for overall platform incident but a large number of staff required first aid management – a new OIM development program treatment after being involved in the emergency including UK training sessions has now been response and fire fighting efforts. implemented for all major offshore complexes • Revised Permit to Work and Isolation Procedures The fire caused extensive damage to one area of the under development were implemented during production facility, including the glycol reboiler skid, an operations resumption efforts and have substantially aerial cooler for a gas lift compressor and extensive improved control and accountability offshore damage to localized piping and wiring. There was an • GUPCO’s Management Team has reviewed their environmental impact that came from an estimated assurance process to identify an appropriate frequency release of 50 barrels of oil to the Gulf of Suez during the for external SMS audits for each major installation fire. The spill fully dissipated and is not considered to • GUPCO has commenced providing an extensive have caused any damage to any environmentally offshore operator competency training programme sensitive areas. provided by Baker International for offshore staff • GUPCO requested assistance from BP to conduct a The platform was shut down for a total of 18 days with Major Hazard Review Study, now under progress lost production of over 60,000 BOPD and remained at less than full production rates for approximately six Key Message: The effectiveness of any management system is months after the event. only proportional to the extent it is utilized. Having a structured, scheduled assurance process is also vital Potential Outcome: The extent of the platform damage could have been much worse with significantly greater loss of production capability. Workers on board the platform during and after the incident could have suffered more serious injury.
What Went Wrong:
• Isolation procedures were not being fully utilized to safely isolate the vessel under maintenance • No evidence of lockout/tagout systems in use • Platform personnel did not feel empowered to activate ESD system when initial leak started • Operator error resulted in live production fluids entering vessel being maintained with Pressure Safety Valves removed • MOC process not effective, P&ID’s outdated • Personnel on Board (POB) info was inaccurate