Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 14 PDF
Session 14 PDF
• Otto Cycle
• Spark Ignition
• Diesel Cycle
• Brayton Cycle
• Gas Turbine
• Rankine Cycle
Carnot Cycle
Q
W
Q-W=0 Æ Q=W
In addition, we know that the efficiency for a
Carnot Cycle is:
TL
η th , Carnot = 1−
TH
Carnot Cycle is not a good model for most real
processes
• For example
• Internal combustion engine
• Gas turbine
• We need to develop a new model, that
is still ideal
Air-Standard Assumptions
V max VBDC
Compression Ratio r= =
V min VTDC
Mean Effective Pressure
2
W = ∫ PdV
1
W = P∆V
v
v
1-2 Isentropic Compression
2-3 Constant Volume Heat Addition
3-4 Isentropic Expansion
4-1 Constant Volume Heat Rejection
Thermal Efficiency of the Otto Cycle
Qnet , 23 − Wnet , 23 = ∆U 23
3
Wnet , 23 = Wother , 23 + Wb , 23 = 0 + ∫ PdV = 0
2
Qnet , 23 = ∆U 23
Qnet , 23 = Qin = mCv (T3 − T2 )
Apply First Law Closed System to Process 4-1,V = Constant
Qnet , 41 − Wnet , 41 = ∆U 41
1
Wnet , 41 = Wother , 41 +W b , 41= 0 + ∫ PdV = 0
4
Qnet , 41 = ∆U 41
Qnet , 41 = − Qout = mCv (T1 − T4 )
Qout = − mCv (T1 − T4 ) = mCv (T4 − T1 )
Qout (T4 − T1 )
η th , Otto = 1− η th , Otto = 1−
Qin (T3 − T2 )
Æ
mCv ( T4 − T1 ) T1 ( T4 / T1 − 1)
= 1− = 1−
mCv ( T3 − T2 ) T2 ( T3 / T2 − 1)
T1
η th , Otto = 1−
T2
Is this the same as the Carnot efficiency?
Efficiency of the Otto Cycle vs. Carnot Cycle
k −1
T1 ⎛ V2 ⎞ 1
= ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 1
T2 ⎝ V1 ⎠ r k −1
η th , Otto = 1 − k −1
Æ r
T1
η th , Otto = 1−
T2
Typical Compression
Ratios for Gasoline
Engines
Increasing Compression Ratio
Increases the Efficiency
Why not use higher compression Ratios?
• Premature Ignition
• Causes “Knock”
• Reduces the Efficiency
• Mechanically need a better design
Diesel Engines
• No spark plug
• Fuel is sprayed into hot compressed air
State Diagrams for the Diesel Cycle
Diesel Cycle Otto Cycle
The only
difference
is in
process
2-3
Consider Process 2-3
• This is the step where heat is transferred into the
system
• We model it as constant pressure instead of constant
volume
qin , 23 − wb ,out = ∆u = u3 − u2
qin , 23 = ∆u + P∆v = ∆h = C p (T3 − T2 )
Consider Process 4-1
• This is where heat is rejected
• We model this as a constant v process
• That means there is no boundary work
q41 − w41 = ∆u
q41 = −qout = ∆u = Cv (T1 − T4 )
qout = Cv (T4 − T1 )
As for any heat engine…
wnet qout
ηth = = 1−
qin qin
qout = Cv (T4 − T1 ) and qin = C p (T3 − T2 )
nth ,diesel = 1−
Cv (T4 − T1 )
= 1−
(T4 − T1 )
C p (T3 − T2 ) k (T3 − T2 )
Rearrange
T1 (T4 T1 − 1)
nth ,diesel = 1−
kT2 (T3 T2 − 1)
PV PV
3 3
= 2 2 where P3 = P2
T3 T2
T3 V3
= = rc
T2 V2
PV PV
4 4
= 1 1 where V4 = V1
T4 T1
T4 P4
=
T1 P1
T1 (TP44 TP11 − 1)
nth ,diesel = 1−
kT2 (rc − 1)
Since Process 1-2 and Process 3-4
are both isentropic
PV = P V and
1 1
k
2 2
k
P V = PV
4 4
k
3 3
k
k
P4 V k
P3 V ⎛ V3 ⎞ k
= 4
k
= ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = rck 3
k
P1 V P2 V
1 ⎝ V2 ⎠ 2
1 1
nth ,diesel = 1−
(
T1 r − 1 c
k
)
kT2 (rc − 1)
Finally, Since process 1-2 is
isentropic
k −1
T1 ⎛ 1 ⎞
=⎜ ⎟
T2 ⎝ r ⎠
1 ⎡ rc − 1 ⎤
k
ηth ,diesel = 1 − k −1 ⎢ ⎥
r ⎣ k (rc − 1) ⎦
k=1.4
The efficiency of the Otto cycle is always higher than the
Diesel cycle