Immaculate Conception Academy 1

South Campus
CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of findings based on the gathered

data. The presentation and discussion follow the order of research questions and problems of this

study.

I. Demographic Profile

TABLE 1.1 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Male 28 43.75%

Female 36 56.25%

Total: 64 100%

Figure 2.1 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

56.25%
Female
36

43.75%
Male
28

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 2

South Campus
Figure 2.1 shows the gender of the respondents. It is noticeable that it is dominated by

female that is comprise of 36 students having 56.25% of the total repondents and 28 students

having 43.75% of the total respondents are male.

TABLE 1.2 SECTION OF THE RESPONDENTS WITH OFW PARENT

STRAND AND SECTION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

G11 ABM BURGOS 11 17.19%

G11 HUMSS ZAMORA 7 10.94 %

G11 STEM GOMEZ 6 9.38 %

G11 STEM FELIPE 4 6.25 %

G12 ABM GUERRERO 7 10.94%

G12 HUMSS BALTAZAR 14 21.88 %

G12 STEM LAKANDULA 11 17.19 %

G12 STEM PATERNO 4 6.25 %

Total: 64 100.02%
 Immaculate Conception Academy 3

South Campus
FIGURE 2.2 SECTIONS OF THE RESPONDENTS WITH OFW PARENT

G12 STEM PATERNO 6.25%

4

G12 STEM LAKANDULA 17.19%

11

G12 HUMSS BALTAZAR 21.88%

14

G12 ABM GUERRERO 10.94%

7

G11 STEM FELIPE 6.25%

4

G11 STEM GOMEZ 9.38%

6

G11 HUMSS ZAMORA 10.94%

7

G11 ABM BURGOS 17.19%

11

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY

Figure 2.2 shows the section of the respondents. 14 (21.88%) came from G11 HUMSS

Baltzar, 11 (17.19%) are from G11 ABM Burgos, 11 (17.19%) came from G12 STEM

Lakandula, 7 (10.94%) are from G11 HUMSS Zamora, 7 (10.94%) came from G12 Guerrero, 6

(9.38%) are from G11 STEM Gomez, 4 (6.25%) came from 11 STEM Felipe and 4 (6.25%) are

from G12 STEM Paterno.

 Immaculate Conception Academy 4

South Campus
TABLE 1.3 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

15 years old 2 3.13 %

16 years old 13 20.31 %

17 years old 28 43.75 %

18 years old 18 28.13 %

19 years old 3 4.64 %

Total: 64 99.96%

FIGURE 2.3 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

4.64%
19 years old
3

28.13%
18 years old
18

43.75%
17 years old
28

20.31%
16 years old
13

3.13%
15 years old
2

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 5

South Campus
Figure 2.3 shows the age of the respondents

II. Results from Survey Questionnaire

TABLE 2.1 PARENTS WORKING ABROAD

POSITION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Mother 15 23.45%

Father 43 67.19%

Both 6 9.38%

Total: 64 100.02%

FIGURE 3.1 PARENTS WORKING ABROAD

9.38%
Both
6

67.19%
Father
43

23.94%
Mother
15

0 10 20 30 40 50

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 6

South Campus
Figure 3.1 shows that

TABLE 2.2 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS WHEN THEIR PARENTS STARTED

WORKING ABROAD

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

0-4 years old 13 20.31%

5-9 years old 26 40.63%

10-15 years old 20 31.25%

16 years old and above 5 7.81%

Total: 64 100%

FIGURE 3.2 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS WHEN THEIR PARENTS STARTED

WORKING ABROAD

16 years old and above 7.81%

5
10-15 years old 31.25%
20
5-9 years old 40.63%
26
0-4 years old 20.31%
13
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 7

South Campus
Figure 3.2

TABLE 2.2 PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT OF PARENTS

CONTINENT FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Asia 42 65.63%

Africa 1 1.56%

Europe 13 20.31%

North America 5 7.81%

South America 2 3.13%

Australia 1 1.56%

Total: 64 100%

FIGURE 3.3 PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT OF PARENTS

Australia 1.56%
1
South America 3.13%
2
North America 7.81%
5
Europe 20.31%
13
Africa 1.56%
1
Asia 65.63%
42
0 10 20 30 40 50

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 8

South Campus
Figure 3.3 illustrates

TABLE 2.3 NATURE OF WORK OF MOTHER

JOB FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Domestic Helper 6 9.38%

Nurse 1 1.56%

Waitress 2 3.13%

Seafarer 1 1.56%

Engineer 1 1.56%

Others:

House Wife 42 65.63

School Helper 1 1.56%

Supervisor 1 1.56%

HR 1 1.56%

Sales Lady 2 3.13%

Factory Worker 1 1.56%

Manager 1 1.56%

Parlorist 2 3.13%

Self-Employed 1 1.56%

Not Available/Deceased 1 1.56%

 Immaculate Conception Academy 9

South Campus
Total: 64 100.%

FIGURE 3.4 NATURE OF WORK OF MOTHER

Not Available/Deceased 1.56%

1
Self-Employed 1.56%
1
Parlorist 3.13%
2
Manager 1.56%
1
Factory Worker 1.56%
1
Sales Lady 3.13%
2
HR 1.56%
1
Supervisor 1.56%
1
School Helper 1.56%
1
House Wife 65.63
42
Others:
Engineer 1.56%
1
Seafarer 1.56%
1
Waitress 3.13%
2
Nurse 1.56%
1
Domestic Helper 9.38%
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY

Figure 3.4 shows

 Immaculate Conception Academy 10

South Campus
TABLE 2.5 NATURE OF WORK OF FATHER

JOB FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Domestic Helper 4 6.25%

Nurse 2 3.13%

Waitress 1 1.56%

Seaman 12 18.75%

Engineer 11 17.19%

Others:

Driver 1 1.56%

Construction Worker 1 1.56%

House Husband 3 4.69%

Factory Worker 4 6.25%

Chef 2 3.13%

Painter 1 1.56%

Quality Control 1 1.56%

Safety Officer 1 1.56%

Supervisor 3 4.69%

Self-Employed 5 7.81%

Gym Instructor 1 1.56%

Life Guard 1 1.56%

Salesman 1 1.56%

Electrician 1 1.56%

Pastor 1 1.56%
 Immaculate Conception Academy 11

South Campus
Aircraft Mechanics 1 1.56%

Barangay Councilor 1 1.56%

Machine Operator 2 3.13%

Technician 1 1.56%

Warehouse In-charge 1 1.56%

Not available/Deceased 1 1.56%

Total: 64 99.98%

FIGURE 2.5 NATURE OF WORK OF MOTHER

 Immaculate Conception Academy 12

South Campus

Not available/Deceased 1.56%

1
Warehouse In-charge 1.56%
1
Technician 1.56%
1
Machine Operator 3.13%
2
Barangay Councilor 1.56%
1
Aircraft Mechanics 1.56%
1
Pastor 1.56%
1
Electrician 1.56%
1
Salesman 1.56%
1
Life Guard 1.56%
1
Gym Instructor 1.56%
1
Self-Employed 7.81%
5
Supervisor 4.69%
3
Safety Officer 1.56%
1
Quality Control 1.56%
1
Painter 1.56%
1
Chef 3.13%
2
Factory Worker 6.25%
4
House Husband 4.69%
3
Construction Worker 1.56%
1
Driver 1.56%
1
Others:
Engineer 17.19%
11
Seaman 18.75%
12
Waitress 1.56%
1
Nurse 3.13%
2
Domestic Helper 6.25%
4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY

Figure 3.5 shows the nature of work of father. In the table,

 Immaculate Conception Academy 13

South Campus
TABLE 2.6 GUARDIAN OF THE RESPONDENTS

GUARDIAN FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Mother 38 59.38%

Father 3 4.69%

Grandparent/s 11 17.19%

Sibling/s 6 9.38%

Other Relative/s 6 9.38%

Nanny 0 0%

Others 0 0%

Total: 64 100.02%

FIGURE 3.6 GUARDIAN OF THE RESPONDENTS

Others 0%
0

Nanny 0%
0

Other Relative/s 9.38%

6

Sibling/s 9.38%
6

Grandparent/s 17.19%
11

Father 4.69%
3

Mother 59.38%
38

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 14

South Campus
Figure 3.6 shows that

TABLE 2.7 MODES OF COMMUNICATION

MODES OF FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

COMMUNICATION

Through direct text/calls 3 4.69%

Through Internet 61 95.31%

(Social Media)

Through Sending Letter 0 0%

Others 0 0%

Total: 64 100%

FIGURE 3.7 MODES OF COMMUNICATION

 Immaculate Conception Academy 15

South Campus

0%
Others
0
0%
Through Sending Letter
0

(Social Media)

95.31%
Through Internet
61
4.69%
Through direct text/calls
3

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY

Figure 3.7

TABLE 2.8 HOW OFTEN DOES THE RESPONDENTS COMMUNICATE WITH

THEIR PARENTS

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Once a day/everyday 38 59.38%

2-4 times a week 22 34.38%

1-3 times a month/monthly 3 4.69%

Others: If signal is available 1 1.56%

Total: 64 100.01%
 Immaculate Conception Academy 16

South Campus
FIGURE 3.8

1.56%
Others: If signal is available
1

4.69%
1-3 times a month/monthly
3

34.38%
2-4 times a week
22

59.48%
Once a day/everyday
38

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY

Figure 3.8
 Immaculate Conception Academy 17

South Campus
III. Perception on Academic Performance and Participation in class of OFW child

TABLE 3.1 LISTENING SKILLS

LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Exceptional 9 14.06%

Exceeds Expectations 42 65.63%

Meets Expectations 13 20.31%

Improvement Needed 0 0%

Unacceptable 0 0%

Total: 64 100%

FIGURE 4.1 LISTENING SKILLS

0%
Unacceptable
0
0%
Improvement Needed
0
20.31%
Meets Expectations
13
65.63%
Exceeds Expectations
42
14.06%
Exceptional
9

0 10 20 30 40 50

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 18

South Campus
Figure 4.1 shows
 Immaculate Conception Academy 19

South Campus
TABLE 3.2 CLASS ENGAGEMENT

LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Exceptional 3 4.69%

Exceeds Expectations 28 43.75%

Meets Expectations 26 40.63%

Improvement Needed 6 9.38%

Unacceptable 1 1.56%

Total: 64 100.01%

FIGURE 4.2 CLASS ENGAGEMENT

1.56%
Unacceptable
1
9.38%
Improvement Needed
6
40.63%
Meets Expectations
26
43.75%
Exceeds Expectations
28
4.69%
Exceptional
3

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 20

South Campus
Figure 4.2 shows
 Immaculate Conception Academy 21

South Campus
TABLE 3.3 TIME MANAGEMENT

LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Exceptional 8 12.5%

Exceeds Expectations 35 54.69%

Meets Expectations 18 28.13%

Improvement Needed 3 4.69%

Unacceptable 0 0%

Total: 64 100.01%

FIGURE 4.3 TIME MANAGEMENT

0%
Unacceptable
0
4.69%
Improvement Needed
3
28.13%
Meets Expectations
18
54.69%
Exceeds Expectations
35
12.50%
Exceptional
8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY
 Immaculate Conception Academy 22

South Campus
Figure 4.3 shows
 Immaculate Conception Academy 23

South Campus

TABLE 4.1 TOTAL POPULATION OF SHS STUDENTS WITH OFW PARENTS

NO. OF STUDENTS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

64 18.77%

FIGURE 5.1 TOTAL POPULATION OF SHS STUDENT WITH OFW PARENT

18.77%

64

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY

Figure 5.1 shows the total number of SHS students with OFW parent. Since, the
total population of SHS is 341, using the frequency percentage it is revealed that 64 students
or 18.77% of the total population is a child of an OFW.