Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Kenji Ishihara JSGE JSCE ASCE JAEE (2002) Failure of Slopes and Soil
Property Characterisation, HKIE Transactions, 9:3, 8-19, DOI: 10.1080/1023697X.2002.10667886
Article views: 60
Some examples of landslides experienced in recent years are introduced with emphasis on evaluation of peak and residual
strengths of sails invalved in the slides. In one example, the peak strength and its interpretation are addressed in relatian to
triggering Of the large-scale landslide. In another example in terrestriai deposit flOW slides in gentle slapes are introduced
and interpreted from the concept of residual strength. Based on iaboratory tests on soils recovered from the sites Of these
landslides, characteristicfeatures Of material behaviour are highlighted putting emphasis on the conditions differentiating
between flow and non-flow type of deformation. For each of the cases stUdied, severai lessans learned are addressed,
indicating the importance of detailed investigation and insight into characteristics of soil behaviour relevant to the sites Of
landslides.
Keywords: Landslide, Stability Anaiysis, Loterai Displacement, Slape Failure, So/l Strength, Debris Flow, Underwater Slope
Instability
'"" """
',4,
,. ',
',
' _.L
L' .J.~
_. I ,
P~2' (0'1'0'))
Dens¢ sand
, ,
L1111lt~d dcfom1ation (Non-now!
q
_IN
,
"
,~
- ,
J .",.J ~ ~...•
,. fJ~--2'
, (.
al~"'3
• 1
Loose sand
, 1
--.~----
- - - - - - - - _.. __. _ - - - - - - - - - - - - The Hong Kong Institution Of Engineers
2550 m, involving about 35 million mJ of soils and rocks. The moving
slide mass shot the north-facing wall of the Denjo River canyon,
.
Stabilitl ana.Iysis
... No failure
disintegrated and burst into the air. Part of the shattered mass jumped
up through a height of about 70 m and sprayed over the ledge of the
for ailure terrace on the south. The main part of the mass was deflected toward
( External anllCV ) the southwest and plummeted down the canyon until it again Impinged
WISUS oc:ck $Irenath
~ on the east-facing waH of the terrace between the Denjo and Nigori RIvers.
Failure
Some fraction of the mass again surged up the west side of the valley
p()$\ -failure
... No flow
to a height of approximately 100 m and after spreading over the terrace,
it slid down into the neighboring valley of the N!gori River in the west.
instability llJ\alysis It flowed further down the valley at probably a reduced speed and
( Gravily - driven ) converged at the confluence into the main debris flow, which had run
{orce versus
residual strength L..I
I Row
down along the zigzag path of the Denjo Valley. The main flow plummeted
further down southw~rds along the valley through a distance of about
9 km until it came to the point of another confluence where the Ohtaki
River streams toward the east. TIle debris flow partly deposited at this
Figure 3 - Classlficatian af Slape Stability Analysis
location and blocked the stream drainage, thereby forming a dammed
Jake on the upstream side of the Ohtaki River. The debris flow traveled
Analysis of slope stability is generally made by considering the peak eastward farther through a distance of 3 km, while depositing some portion,
strength and therefore. it is the analysis to see if failure is Indeed triggered until it came to a complete standstill at Korigase. The totai distance of
or not. If a slope is identified to be composed of loose soils exhibiting travel was 12 k.m and the debris flow claimed 9 casualties. Summarising
the contractive behaviour, analysis can also be made by envisioning the accounts of eyewitnesses, the travel time for the debris flow is estimated
the state of soils deforming largely after a failure has been triggered to have been on the order of 8 minutes, and therefore the average speed
where tile mobilized strength is now smaller than the peak strength. was 80 km/h.
This type of analysis may be called post-failure instability analysis or
The schematic cross section along the entire leg of runout path of the
now analysis. A series of analysis envisioning these two stages of soil
debris Is shown in Fig 8, where it may be seen that the course of the
deformation Is illustrated in a flow chart shown in Rg 3.
debris trow Is divided into three parts; the upper reach where scouring
In the following. several examples of slope failures will be introduced and grooving by the passing debris was predominant. the middle course
and reviewed from the context as above, and some points will be
highlighted which are important from perspectives of soil mechanics.
\~
General
A strong earthquake shook the central part of the Japan mainland at
8:48am on September 14, 1984 with its epicenter located at the southern
foot of Mount Ontake about 100km northeast of Nagoya, as shown In
Fig 4. The detailed map in the heavily affected area is shown in Fig 5.
By far the most spectacular in this earthquake was a cataclysmic debris
flow that originated on the south flank of the Mount Ontake and obliterated ,,,
the forest regIon of deeply incised valleys. The location of the debris ,
flow is shown in Fig 6, and its more detailed feature is demonstrated in o 5 10 km 1 "',,/
l J
Fig 7. The debris avalanche originated, as a huge landslide. from the
!
-'
south face of the mountain, between the altitudes of 1850 and
37"N
KlyolOWl
'I
Figure 4 - Location of the Epicenter Of the Naganoken-seibu Earthquake
Of 1984 Figure 6 - Runout Route Of the Mt Ontake Debris Avalanche
-+ Main river
~ Overflow
[] Deposition
Denuooted
§] area
~::::::I Hommocky
Qrea
Dammed
lake
Ohtaki Korigose
river
Figure 7 - Feature oj Flow oj the Debris Avalanche Figure 9 - Three Dimensional View oJ Mt Ontake Slide Zone
slide
( Grooving)
scraping
I ("'rHaL
depositIon
) I (~lt;on)
""9"''''
lava
o L~1--2~~3-~4~...."S--e6~-7=---;6--e9:--,,"'O--f11,----,'''""'2
II
lava
D'istance (km) .•••
•••
,.
Scoria
Conglom-
erate
in which both scouring and deposition took place, and the gently sloping
part of the lower course where deposition of debris took place to a
!ill
PumicE'
Spring
on the south flank of the Mount Ontake at a site about 2.5 km southeast
of the peak, as shown in Rg 5. The topmost part of the headwall scarp
was located at an altitude of 2550 m and the lowest elevation of the f".
;10- 'New ""'"
:Old scarp
o 300m
-J--J
slide scarp was at an altitude of 1850 m. The slide covered an area •
61
about 300 m wide and 1300 m long. A three-dimensIonal representation t :51.ide orea
of the slide area is given in Fig 9, where it is to be noticed that the
depth of sliding plane was almost 150 m at its deepest location. Figure 10 - Geological Regime In the Headwafl in Mt Ontake Landslide
The geological conditions over the basal failure surface and ;n its (Sakal, 7985)
G, ro (%) W, Ip
Mt Ontake No 1 269 13.4 120 N, N, Figure 13 - Strength Charaderistics of Pumice from Mt Ontake Slide Area
headwaJi (NO 2sitel
scarp No 2 2.56 12.8-13.2 100-110 N, N,
Table 1 - Physical Properties Of the Pumices at 7Ivo Sites of Londsliding
Stability Analyses
Seismic stability analyses were conducted for the head scarp landsliding
1OC~~~~~~
~ Mt. Ontake
by using the pseUdo-static method Of slope stability analysis as follows,
-
<
-HeadwoU
- scarp
I
,•
0
(Pumice)
Fd ~
IW tan <I> + Col coso; I/(cos'o; (1 + tan 0; tan <l>/F,lI
(1 )
•
" so . I [wtano;+ a;, ,w]
--
•"
-•e" where W, I, a and denote, respectively, the total weight, the length and
~
the inclination of the sliding plane of each slice, as illustrated in Fig 14.
0 This formula is a modified version of the formula originally proposed
0001 0.01 ().1
Grain 5izf' (mm) by Janbu (1955). In this method, the effect of seismic loading is allowed
for by an equivalent statIc force determined as the produd of the maximum
Figure 12 - Typical Gradation Curve of Pumicefrom the Site Of Landsliding acceleration, arT\ilx' and the weight of the potential sliding mass.
------'--------------------m
TRANSACTIONS. Volume 9 Number 3
The cross section shown tn Rg 11 was considered to represent the most
critical sliding surface on which the sliding was first triggered during
the earthquake (Sakai 1985). The analysis of slope stability was made,
therefore, for the profile modeled thereafter as shown in Ag 15. As
Indicated in Fig 15. the entire mass was divided into 16 slices for the
computationClJ scheme. The soil at the bottom of slices 1 to 11 was
allocated a strength parameter of ¢l = 500 because this part consists of
angular sand and gravel derived form volcanic Lava flow. The slices 12
to 14 were underlaid by the pumice which was identified to be a highly
porous soil directly associated with the catastrophic slide. In accordance
with the strength data shown in Fig 13, the angle of internal friction
was taken as (f) = 23° and the cohesion in dynamic loading. Co' was
assumed to be 300 kPa, a value twice as much as the static cohesion
indicated in Fig 13. The reason for thIs increased cohesion is based on
a number of dynamic loading tests that have ever been conducted on
cohesive solls (Ishihara, 1985). For the slices 15 to 16 the materIals consist
of fractured lava and conglomerate and, as such, are assumed to have
Figure 14 - Nototion of Slope Stobllity AnalysIs
an angle of internal friction of ell = 500. Unit weight of soil and rock in
each slice Is assumed equally to be 1, = 20 kN/m 1.
The factor of safety computed by Eq (1) is plotted versus the maximum
acceleration in Rg 16, where it can be seen that the fador of safety,
Fd , drops to unity when the acceleration becomes equal to about 280
gal. This value of equivalent acceleration may be considered reasonable
jUdging from the values estimated by several sources of information. It
may be mentioned that Initiation of the landslidlng can be Llscribed to
the presence of a thin layer of pumice deposit at great depths which
had probably been under near-saturated conditions due to the water
1 •• permeation from the heavy rainfall preceding the earthquake.
lessons Learned
One of the characteristic features of this slide was the fad that the slide
300m 0 took place along a deep-seated soil deposit which was located at a depth
I I l--l
of 100 m to 150 m. It is to be noted that the presence of a cohesive
soil at a considerable depth does not contribute much for maintaining
the stability of slopes. This tad can easily by understood if one considers
a simple case of a long slope in which the sliding surface is located at
Figure 15 - Praf/le of Sliding Usedfor Analysis (Mt Ontake Headwall) some depth, H, parallel to the slope surface. In static conditions, fador
of safety, F, can be obtained by
tan (f) c
F= +--,,-=~---::;:,-- (2)
tan 0: 1, H cos ex sin 0.
Mt. Ontake slide where a is the inclination of the slope and Yt denotes the unit weight
2·0 Headwall scarp of the soil. The first term on the right-hand side indicates the contribution
."
Static factor from the frictional resistance and the second term the resistance due
"-,
of safety to cohesion component It Is to be noted that the resistance due to cohesion
•d
/ can be activated In a form of (/Yl H, and, therefore, if the depth of a
~
0
sliding surface, H, is large, the resistance by cohesion becomes negligibly
-• •
<T
.c
c small and the main resistance comes form friction. Therefore, when a
d
layer of soft 5011 exists at a great depth with an Inclination, ex, Which is
'·5
grater than the angle of internal friction of the soil, <1>, the factor of safety
'"c
c computed by Eq (2) could take a value less than unity for the case in
0
." which the value of el"{\ H becomes very small. In such a case, it is
--••
~
d
apparent that the stability of slopes could be seriously endangered. From
the considerations as above, one of the important lessons one could
-
0 1·0
learn from the tragedy of Mt Ontake landslide is the fad that wherever
there exists a deposit of clayey soils In slopes at a considerable depth,
-
L
0
the stability of soil and rock mass overlying the clayey soils must be
u
0
"-
considered meager. Therefore, It 15 cautioned that detection of any deposit
of cohesive soils by deep boring is badly in need whenever an important
construdion projed is under plan on mountain slopes.
Q.5l-.L-c':-:--'----,-'-'--,L----'-...,...~~-'--~-'-' Shown also in Ag 6 is the fador of safety in the static condition prior
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 to the earthquake which is obtained by using static cohesion.
Mox. acceleration Qmax (gal)
(=150 kPa, in Eq (1) with the condition amax = O. It may be seen that
the slope must have been in a stable condition prior to the earthquake
with a factor of safety of about 1.63, but lead to the catastrophic failure
Figure 76 - Factor Of Safety Versus Acceleration because of the additional dynamic force during the quake.
1Df-----------------------------------::Th~e:'-H::o-n-:-g=-K:::o-:-n=-g=-l:::n-::st:::itu=-t:::io=-n=-0:::1:::E::n::g:::in::ee=rs
Flow Slide in the Collapsible Loess Deposit in
Ex-soviet Tajik VOrzob
vaHey
General
In the suburb of Dushanbe, Tajikistan Republic of ex-USSR, an earthquake
-t
~
A90gal
Habobod S
of magnitude 5.5 took place on January 23, 1989. In this event, extensive l' L. .Dushanbe
liquefaction developed in the loess deposit of Aeolian origin In the gently ~ aSOgaL
c
sloping hilly terrain and led to a series of catastrophic landslides ~ ~gal
accompanied by a large-scale mudflow. In contrast to the hitherto known • .5
lOOgal
cases of liquefaction which have usually occurred in water-saturated sand
IUihok
deposits, the liquefaction in Tajik was unique and novelln that it occurred
unexpededly in a windlaid deposit of silt in a semi-arid region. The reasons
63()gal
for such liquefaction are thought to be the collapsible nature of highly
porous loessal silt Which had been wetted by irrigation water over the Cymbvlif A60gal
past years. The complete collapse of the loess structure due to the
o 10km
addItional action of the seismic shaking appears to have led to the LI~~-,--,-.JI
.c:.60gal
catastrophic landslide. In addition, the silt-sized soil constituting the loess
was of low plasticity and hence could easily slump and flow through a
distance as long as 2.0 km (Ishihara et al. 1990).
The location of the epicenter is shown in the map of Fig 1Z As shown
in Fig 18, the affected areas Is located on a relatively flat basin-like plain
whIch developed in front of the southern flank of the Pamir Mountain Figure 19 -Intensity Distribution Of the 1989 Jan 23 Earthquake
range. The epicentral area is located at Gissar near the junction of the
Kahirnighan River and the Halaka River as shown in Ag 19. landslide and Debris Flow
In the Village of Gissar, there were about 500 farmer's houses and bams
constructed of woods with adobe type walls. Even In the most severely
affected area, the degree of structural damage was moderate and limited
to small local area with Village houses and barns being partially destroyed.
The most striking feature of the damage was a series of landslides and
debris flow which took place over the gently sloping hilly terrain consisting
of windblown deposits 'loess'. There were four landslides In the affected
Chino
area of Gissar as indicated in plan view of Fig 20. One of the largest at
Savdi Okuli turned into a mudflow of vast scale and buried more than 100
Arabia
houses in 5 meters of mUd. An estimated 220 Villagers dies or were
Ri:a,dh
missing in the debris.
The largest and most cataclysmic phenomenon was the multiple slides
at Okuli which developed in a Slightly depressed area over hilly farmlands.
The plan view of the slide is shown in Rg 20. The genetic portion of
the slide extends westward over a length of about 1.5 km from the
escarpment at the east (see Fig 20). Taking into account the fact that
the slide encompasses an area about 850 m in frontage and 15 m In
depth on the average, the total volume of the soil mass is estimated to
be approxImately 20 million CUbic meters. At least two slides seem to
have been triggered independently from the hillsides on the north which
Figure 17 - Location of the Landslide in Tajik
• TQtl'lk~nt
•
-1-
_.¥l'OI....
.
• _,Rood
,~
1 : 11.oco
o \.Ok'"
L..I_~_-'I
Figure 18 - Location Of Dushanbe and Landslide Figure 20 - Plan View Of the Slide Area In Gissar
--~---=-~~---------------'m
TRANSACTIONS. Volume 9 Number 3
then merged into the main stream of the mudflow. There were many Soli Condillons In the Affected Area
traces of violent mud flow remaining on the exposed soils, indicating
The area affected by the earthquake has a topography of gently sloping
evidence of liquefaction and consequent muddy flow of loess soil during hilly terrain, The wind laid material is silt and tan to light brown in colour.
the earthquake (see Fig 21). The slides indicated by A and C in Fig 14
The soil conditions in this area were investigated by the Geological Bureau
appear to have been initiated along the line of the water channel. It
of Tajikistan Academy of Science in Dushanbe. The cross section along
appears likely that a small slide Initially Induced at the toe might have
the longitudinal direction of the slide (A-A' section in Fig 20) is presented
retrogressed backwards over a distance of 15 km to the east and sideward
in Fig 24. It may be seen that the loess deposit covers the ground surface
to the north as well as to the south. Over the rugged sliding area, the
to a depth of about 30 to 40 m, underlain by gravelly sand which varies
original ground was broken into many blocks producing an extremely in thickness to a maximum of 200 m.
irregular and hummocky surface. Amid broken blocks, there were spreads
of soil mud having presumably sprung out of the in-depth sliding zone, The results of investigations by the Geological Bureau of Tajikistan
suggesting that liquefaction of saturated loess soil occurred during the Academy of Science show that the ground water table is located about
earthquake. The sliding mass of the loess soil turned into a huge-scale 5 m from the ground surface, but the water content diminishes around
debris flow and traveled through a distance of about 2 km on nearly the depth of 20 m which is underiain by dry layers of the ioess. It is
flat surface of the ground, Near the distal tongue of the debris flow at also reported that, while the layer of loess about 3 m in thickness below
Okuli-poen, tens of farmer's houses and barns were buried in 2 to 5 the ground water table has a water content of about 20%, the loess
meters of mud. A photograph in Fig 22 shows buried houses near the layer below this level does possess a higher water content with a maximum
end of he debris. of 40%, On the other hand, the laboratory tests have shown that the
liquid limit and plastic limIt of the loess is around 30 and 20, respectively,
Several cone penetration tests were performed on the rugged surface,
giving a value of about 10 for the plasticity index. Thus the natural water
at places 1 through 13 as indicated in Fig 20, by means of a portable content of the highly saturated loess is in excess of the liqUid limit. Fig
cone device. Typicai results of the cone tests are shown in Fig 23, where 25 shows the grain size distribution curve of the loess, It may be seen
it may be seen that in the sliding zone at depths of about 7 to 8 m, that the loess is comprised of 80% of silt and 15% of cray fraction, and
qc-value was found to be about 1-5 kgf/cm 2 , that there is no sand fraction.
Ok_Ill lotld4l1dt
1 Debril<.l.Okrnl _ _
r
800 m
,
"'"
Figure 21 - A View from the North over the Eastern Escarpment Of Okuli .-- ---
Slide
:..~ .-.-Jokm
"'"
m
..,
--~
-
.._...._, .. _- -- .. - ---- Figure 24 - Cross Section through A-A'
0 - 5i I t
-
o , , ,
~ , ~. ( g "::<tn"J
e'----'--._'"- P:~ , • 'I,• • (I;I/[m')
0.001 0.01 O. 1
4 8 10
" " " " "
,
,
, (,
N<>.O,'O J
,
, lb,
,"",II,ll,13
Particle size
, Okllti ili"'"
lGjik, USSR , O~ul; llld.
TaJ;k,Us.s.R.
Figure 25 - Gradation Curve Of the Loess 5011
•
, ,•
, .. -/'."'"'-'
_ ....t...
•,.,........ ....
~". "" ~
/'"-"--'
, Characteristics of loess Deposits
,
,• ~
It is well known that windblown deposits of soils characteristically possess
, ~~ vertical cleavage planes. It is also known (Clevenger, 1958; Dudley, 1970;
, Chen, 1987) that the windlaid loess is tan to light brown in color, light-
lO·
" weight and consists of matrix of cemented silt with a number of
interspersed macro and micro pores which are purported to be remains
of root holes. Generally, the loess deposit Is devoid of clear stratification
Figure 23 - Cone Penetration Test Results at Okuli Slide Area and is highly crumbly and brittle in a dry state, being easily crumbled
10' ,W
~lth water. When maintained dry, it is reasonably strong and
w, w,
incompressible and the porous structure may persist even under a fairly · '"
I
~arge a.v.erburden pressure. However, once wetted, the loess may lose 5 ~
Its stabilIty. Because of Its highly porous nature, water can easily infiltrate !\J
into the pores, whereby breaking down the matrix structure. As a result
a significant amount of decrease in bulk volume and loss of shear strength
, ":",TV:/.:
0
~~~
solu ~
can take place upon water Inundation under sustained loads, leading rott>d
, zonr
to large settlements or failure of structures founded on such loess deposits
(Chen, 1987). This kind of characteristics is often referred to as hydraulic
•
•
S
"'r''/1
~;~: )};j
collapsibility.
.' 20 I
Another feature of engineering sIgnificance is the fact that disturbed loess ·, ..-. ..'..' . . - .. . . ..- . .
'.
• •
I
. ...' •.• •.' ' w, w,
Is of low-plasticity with its Atterberg limits plotting near the A-line in
the plasticlty chart. The plasticity index of the loess is generally around
·.' . . . ' .....•
• • •••••• •
2s
m
=T=-RA=-N~S~A~CT=/:-:O~N:-:S-'-~~0~/u-m-e-9-=-:-N~um-be-r:-:3------ -----------~---------------III
magnitude of driving force to cause failure. It is to be noted that no
landslide and mudflow in such a gentle slope would indeed take place
with such a large scale except by the shaking of an earthquake.
The wlndlald loess consisting maInly of silt·sized soli was likely to be K.P. ±()m
I H,W_l~::~
in a barely stable state on the verge of hydraulic collapse before the l.W~-:-
11I1-----~--------------------------------7::::h;-e--:-:H;-o-ng-;K;-o-:n-:g-:ln-:s::t::itU-t~io::n:--:af;-E-;n=-g::in=-e=-e=rs
reclaimed fills. It is conceivable that there were dual factors which might
have acted to produce the lateral displacement of the caisson walls. These
are inertia force due to the intense shaking and softening of soils
surrounding the caisson caused by buildup of pore water pressure. It
may be roughly assumed that the effects of pore water pressure buildup
including liquefaction were, by and large, the same all over the waterfront
areas in Kobe port that were affected by the earthquake. However. the
effects of inertia force are deemed different depending upon the direction
to which the revetment line is oriented. As a matter of fad. the records
of accelerations secured during the earthquake showed motion
characteristics which are largely biased to the northwest·southeast direction.
Based on the records obtained nearby, the acceleration inferred to have
acted on the quaywalls oriented in two directions were established by
lnagaki et al. (1996) as indicated in Fig 32. It may be seen that the
horizontal acceleration against the north- or south-facing walls was of
order of 500 gal whereas an acceleration of the order of 250 .
300 gal is inferred to have acted against the east- or west-facing walls.
In view of this, all the data on the ground displacements measured by Figure 32 - Magnitude Of Acceleration Inferred to Have Acted on the
the method of the ground surveying at Port Island, Rokko Island and Quaywalf Facing Different Directions (lnagaki et 01., 1996)
Fukaehama were divided into two groups; one pertaining to the north-
or south-facing walls and the others to the east- or west-facing walls.
Fig 33 shows all the lateral displacements from the north- or south- 500
facing caisson walls plotted together, versus the distance from the line
of revetment. It is noteworthy that there is an acute drop in the North or south lacing
400 caisson waifs
displacement in the vicinity of the walls, which is indicative of pronounced
influence of inertia force in producing the large displacement near the
walls. Fig 34 shows all the data of the ground displacements obtained
at the sites where the quaywalls are oriented towards the east or west. f-2 - fl·z
P,8 ----. A·3·-··
As compared to similar data arrangements shown in Fig 33, the attenuation I"~ _._.. fl-. _._.-
,., - - - fl·~ _ . -
of lateral displacements is seen in Fig 34 being more gradual even in 1"·7 _ •• - fl'·! _.,_
Averag9 Cll0V9 -
the area in proximity to the walls. Taking the average cUlVes of attenuation
shown in Fig 33 and 34, the lateral displacement at any point normalized 100
Reclaimed
deposll East or west ladng
~ca~'s,!:so~"~w~a'!l's,-_.
(Masado)
Rokko Island •
E 300
East $k.Idge
treatment 6119
J
"iii 200
f·t _
p_, ._
f-3 _ ••••
p.: _.-
p., _ ..-
P'·s-
1"-&-_ •••
p-·s _. __.
1\-1 _ . -
I\~ - ...
~ Average <;UfVll -
2S
100
B
o~~""~"c._.~"..~
SOy day
.. ·..
o 50 100 1W ~
Oistancelrom \he waterfront (m)
behind the walls facing the east or west direction. The reason for the
rapid attenuation in the former case is sImply the larger movements of
the quaywalls which were caused by a greater acceleration in the north-
south direction during the Kobe earthquake. As discussed above, the
ground movements in the backland retained by the east- or west-facing
walls appear to have been caused primarily by the liquefaction of the
Figure 31 - Soil Profile at a Site Near the Section R-2 and R~3 (Hanshin
soil deposit, and for this reason, it would be legitimate to choose the
Highway Authority, 1993)
-------,-------------------111
TRANSACTIONS. Volume 9 Number 3
, , offered by his colleagues. The author also wishes to express the mind
1.0 of his sincere thanks for the colleagues in Hong Kong as represented
by Professor C F lee for their kindness in Inviting and according me a
great honour to deliver this prestigious Peter lumb lecture.
~
i
I
eUlor_
"i
E 0.5
I
!K!Ig _als
References
8
0"
~i NQ,ltI Qf toult!
1. Chen, z.v. (19871, 'Problems of regional salls', Proc. 8th Asian Regional
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, Vol.
~O
~
I
/ 2, pp. 'lfi7-190.
2. Clevenger, W.A. (1958), 'Experiences wltn loess as foundatIon materiu]",
Transaction of ASCE, No. 2916, pp. 151·169.
0, 3. Dudley, J.H. (1970), ~Review of collapsing soils", Journal of A5CE, SM3, pp.
0 so 100 ISO 200 925-947
4. IShihara, K., Yasuda, K. and Kato, M. (199n, "Characteristics of lateral Spreading
Oislance lrom the _Iertron! 1m)
In Liquefied Deposits during the 1995 Hanshln-AwaJi Earthquake", Journal Of
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, NO.1, pp. 23-55.
Figure 35 - Comparison 0/ Normalized Displacement Patterns in 5. Ishihara, K. (1993), "Liquefaction and Flow Failure during Earthquakes,
Geotechnique, Vol. 23, pp. 315-415.
Liquefied Deposits Retained by the Quaywafls Facing Different Directions
6. Ishihara, K., Okusa, S. Oyagl, N. and A. Ischuk (1990), 'liquefaction-Induced
FloW Slide In the Collapsible loess Deposit in Soviet TaJik', Soils and Foundations,
attenuation curve pertaining to the east- or west-facing walls for practical Vol. 30, NO.4, pp. 73'89.
purposes where estimate of lateral displacements Is needed considering 7. IShihara, K, and Koseki, J. (1989), "CYCliC shear strength of fines·containing
the quaywall movements less than 2.0 m with a ground shaking of the sands-, Proc. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 12th International Conference
on Soli Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rio de Janeiro. pp. 101-106.
order of 200-300 gal.
8- Ishihara, K. (J986), 'Analysis of landslides during the 1984 Naganoken-seibu
Earthquake', Proc. of International Symposium on Engineerlng Geology Problems
Lessons Learned in Seismic Areas, ttalian Group of IAEG, 8arl, Italy, vol. 2, pp. 175-215.
9. Ishihara, K. (1985), "Stability of Natural Deposits DurIng Earthquakes', Proe.
No matter whether it may be due to earthquakes or due to other causes,
of 11 th International Conference on Soil Mechanics ancl Foundation Engineering.
if the quay wall in the harbour area is displaced laterally on the order san Franciscc, Vol. 2, pp. 321"376.
of 2.0 m, the possibility will be high that the lateral movement tends 10. Inagakl, H., lai, S., Sugano, T., Yamazaki. H. and Inatomi, T. (1996), 'Perfonnance
to propagate inland and facilities installed on tile backland is exposed of caisson type quay walls at Kobe Port', Soils and Foundations, Special Issue,
to danger of damage. Thus, it would be necessary to pay due consideration pp.119-136.
to Its damaging effects. It was shown in the in-situ survey that the lateral 11. Janbu, N. (1955), "Application of Composite Slip surface for Stability Analysis',
Proc. European Conference on Stability of Earth Slopes, Stockholm, (31, PP
movement could reach a place about 100m inland from the quaywalJ,
43-39,
if the soil developed flow"type deformatIon with the quaywall displacement 12. Masaki, K., Tilniguchl, H., iida, K., Muramafsu, I, Taga, N. and Tagashl. Y. (1985),
of the order of 2.0 m. 'Intensity Distribution Based on Seismic Records of Ground' Motions, Damage
10 Houses and Ground, Overturns of Gravestones, and Questionnaire Survey',
Conclusive Remarks Synthetic Investigation Of Earthquake and Damoge of the Nogonoken-seibu
Earthquake 0/1984, pp. 83-88. (in Japanese)
Results of detailed studies were introduced for four cases of landslides. 13. Sakai, J. (1985), "landslide Associated with the Westem Nagano Prefecture
Earthquake, 1984", SynthetiC Investigation Of Earthquake and Damage Of Ihe
It was shown that individual cases of landslides exhibited different
Noganoken-seibu Earthquoke Of 1984, pp. 165-178. (in Japanese)
characteristic features in terms of soil behaviour particUlarly when the
soils are deformed largely.
In the first case in which the mountain slope was studied, the importance 2nd Lumb Lecture - Introduction of the Speaker
was addressed for performing deep boring even ttuough stiff and hard
materIals with an aim to identify layeres of cohesive soils, if they happen Mrs lumb, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen,
to exist. The existence of cohesion less soils at great depths was shown First of all, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation of the Lumb
to endanger the stability of slopes and once the failure is triggered, it lecture Committee under the chairmanship or Prof C F lee, for having
would bring about a catastrophic consequence because of a huge volume organised this distinguished event In memory of my most respected teacher
of earth materials involved. Professor Peter lumb.
In tile second example described above, the collapsible soils were shown Tonight it is a great pleasure to introduce our distinguished speaker of
to have a potential to become unstable if they are put in conditions the 2nd Lumb Lecture, Prof Kenji Ishihara.
where water is Inundated. Failure of even gentte slopes could readily
Prof Ishihara is currenlly a Professor In the Civil Engineering Department
take place, if there is a triggering agency such as seismic shaking. Once
of Chua University in Tokyo and the Science University of Tokyo. He is
it Is triggered, the slide tends to turn into a large-scale debris flow involving
also the Professor Emeritus of the University of TOkyo. Prof Ishihara received
a large volume of soils and brings about disastrous consequence.
his education in Civil Engineering at the University of Tokyo, obtaining
In the last example quoted above, the importance was addressed for his BS"degree in 1957, MS'degree in 1959, and PhD in 1963. During
considering the progression of soil movement backwards from the 1966 to 1967, he was a Visiting Research Associate at the University
wLlterfront which is caused by the lateral deformation of quaywalls. In of Illinois in Urbana USA. He has been affiliated with the University of
the backyard behind the quaywall, there may exist facilitles such as load- Tokyo since then, taking the post of professorship in geotechnical
unloading cranes, warehouses, storage tanks or chemical plants. These engineering since 1977.
industrial facilitates are exposed to danger of injuring if such ground
Prof Ishihara served for ISSMFE as secretary of Japanese National
movement occurs. Committee for the period of 7 years between 1970 and 1976 and as
Vice-President of Asian region of ISSMFE during the period of 1989-
Acknowledgements 1993. Between 1997-200'1 he was the President of the International
SOCiety.
ThIs text consists of an excerpt from several works and papers previously
pUblished. The author wishes to acknowledge much cooperative assistance Prof Isllihara's major research interest covers problems in 5011 dynamics
mr--------------------------------------T.:::h=-e=-H=-o::n::g=-::K:::o::ng:::-;/n::s:;tl:::·tu:::t:;:io::n:-o:::if-;E~n::g::in:::e::e=rs
associated with earthquakes, such as liquefaction of sandy deposits, and a teacher and well respected by his students, many of whom <Ire in senior
seismic stability of slopes and earth structures. He has written about 250 positions in geotechnical engineering today.
papers on the above subjects.
Prof Ishihara is a very fitting speaker this evening. He too is a fundamental
He has served on various occasions as consultant or adviser to UNESCO thinker and his work is held in high esteem internationally.
projects in many countries including India, Iran, Yugoslavia, Mexico, Chile
The second Lumb lecture has concerned failures of slopes, and at what
and Ecuador. He is the author of a book 'Fundamentals of Soil Dynamic'
a scale, 35 million cubic metres, three orders of magnitUde greater than
(1974) and textbook 'Soil Mechanics' (1988) both in Japanese, He recently
we have seen in Hong Kong, and a travel distance of 12 kms, about 10
published in Oxford Press an English book entitled 'Soil Behaviour in
times the travel distance of the Tsing Shan Flow slide.
Earthquake Geotechnics',
We, in Hong Kong, spend a lot of time and effort in upgrading slopes
Prof Ishihara has received many honours by being assigned on many
to prevent disasters. It is Important that unless we know how slopes can
occasions to deliver lectures worldwide including the theme lecture in
fail we are missing the point.
11th ICSMFE in San Francisco and the 33rd Rankine Lecture of the British
Geotechnical Society in 1993. He acted as chairman of the Technical Prof Ishihara has gIven us three cases histories and has highlighted 'lessons
Committee TC4 on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering from 1985-1993. learned'. They are there to stimulate our fundamental thinking. The
He has also received honour by being awarded H B Seed Gold Medal challenge is, when there are some 54,000 man made feature to inspect,
in 1998 from American Society of Civil Engineers. For his significant are we still thinking fundamentally?
contribution, title of Honorary Doctorate was conferred to him from Prof Ishihara, Peter lumb always gave us things to think about, you have
Technical University of Bucharest, Romania in 1995 and from Istanbul given us a very special lecture, we would all like to thank you.
Technical University, Turkey in 1999.
This evening, we are greatly honoured to have Prof Ishihara to present Ir Dr John ENDICOTT
the Second lumb Lecture on 'Failure of Slopes and Soil Property
Charaderlsation', In his lecture, some examples of landslides experienced
in recent years will be introduced with emphasis on evaluation of peak
and residual strengths of soils involved in landslides. This is very relevant
to HK slope problems. Without further ado, I would like to Invite you to
join me to welcome Prof Ishihara on stage to present his lecture. Thank Kenji ISHIHARA
you. Prof Ken)1 Ishihara is currently a Professor in the
Department of Civll Engineering. Chua University, Tokyo
Ir Raymond K S CHAN and the Science University of Tokyo. He Is also the
former President of the International Society for Soil
MechanIcs and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). His
2nd Lumb Lecture - Vote of Thanks major research Interest covers problems In soil dynamics
associated with earthquakes. He has been invited to
deliver many prestigious lectures worldwide, InCluding
Mrs lumb, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,
the theme lecture at the 11 th ICSMFE in San Francisco
Prof Lumb was a fundamental thinker, he was concerned to get to the and the 33rd Rankine Lecture of the British Geotechnical
root of an issue and that It should be properly understood. He was also Society in 1993.