No. Student’s Name Student’s No.

Student’s Group
1.
2.
3.
4.
FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
EVALUATION FORM
ENGINEER IN SOCIETY (EEE610) DATE:
ASSIGNMENT REPORTING SKILLS
Project Title:
PRS MARKS (M) Weighted
Performance Criteria Marks 1 2 3 4 5 Marks
CLO LO
(PC) Allotted Obtained
(Very Weak) (Weak) (Moderate) (Strong) (Very Strong) (WMO)
General Requirements: Correct paper Correct paper (=M X 2)
Wrong paper Wrong paper
Written according to structure with more structure with less Correct paper and
CO1 PO6 10.00 structure and structure but partially
format (to use FYP than 2 wrong than or equal to 2 Correct Format
wrong format wrong format
format) formatting elements formatting elements
Introduction: (=M X 2)
• Background of Study
• Problem Statement:
Problem Identification, Only 1 element Only 2 elements Only 3 elements Only 4 elements All elements
CO1 PO6 10.00
Significance of the study clearly stated clearly stated clearly stated clearly stated clearly stated
• Objective
• Scope of Work
• Report Organization
Literature Review: Explain previous Explain previous (=M X 2)
• Students should be able Explain previous studies, with good studies related
Explain previous
to review the references studies, with discussions on pros with good
Literature review studies, but no
within the scope of study CO1 PO6 10.00 insufficient and cons. No discussions on
irrelevant to study discussions on pros
•Students should also be discussions on pros explanation of the pros and cons, and
and cons
able to perform analysis and cons need of study at the finally explain the
on previous works end need of the study
There is relevant (=M X 3)
Methodology: There is relevant There is relevant
No relevant flowchart flowchart or block
• Students should include No relevant flowchart or block flowchart or block
or block diagram. The diagram and the
design methodology, flowchart or block diagram and the diagram and
procedures or procedures or
block diagram, flow diagram and there procedures or procedures or
techniques or techniques or
charts, Gantt Chart etc. CO1 PO6 15.00 is no procedures techniques or techniques or
experimental setup experimental setup
and relevant techniques or techniques or experimental setup are experimental setup
are not in sequence, are partially in
and tools towards experimental in sequence, logical, are in sequence,
illogical, incomplete sequence, logical,
achieving the relevant setup complete and partially logical, complete
and unclear complete and
outcomes/results clear and very clear
partially clear

EEE610 (ENGINEER IN SOCIETY) EVALUATION FORM FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, UiTM Hj Ir. HARIZAN CHE MAT HARIS Wednesday, March 07, 2018
 Results and Discussion: (=M X 5)
• Students should exhibit
the significant results of
Results are
the assignments. Results do not Results are available Results are
Results are available available with
• Students should be able CO1 PO6 25.00 meet project’s without analysis and available with wrong
with correct analysis correct analysis
to discuss, analyze and objective discussion analysis
and discussion
synthesize the results
obtained for further
improvements.
Conclusion: (=M X 3)
• Students should be able
to conclude the findings No conclusion on
in addressing the the achievement
Only 1 element All element fulfilled All element fulfilled
attainment of the specific of project All element fulfilled
CO1 PO6 15.00 fulfilled but not but not clearly but only 1 element
objective of the objectives, No and clearly stated
clearly stated stated clearly stated
assignments and recommendation
recommend future of future work
improvements/corrective
measures.
References: (=M X 1)
• Students should refer to
More than 3
the reliable and technical More than 1 references
More than 5 references and less
references in accordance All references are and less than or equal All references are
CO1 PO6 5.00 references are in than or equal to 5
to the specific IEE format in incorrect format to 3 references are in in correct format
incorrect format references are in
(i.e. IEEE, conference incorrect format
incorrect format
paper, refereed journals
etc.)
Good variation in (=M X 2)
Correctly used choice
Very frequently Very seldom used Correctly used using choice of
of words and exists
Others : used wrong wrong choice of choice of words words with good
good transitions
choice of words words with more than with more than 10 transitions and
between statements.
• Writing Style with more than 30 20 grammatical error grammatical error coherence between
Has more than 5
grammatical but less than or equal but less than or statements. Has
CO1 PO6 10.00 grammatical errors but
• Grammar errors. Wrong to 30 grammatical equal to 20 less than 5
less than or equal to
citations observed error. Wrong citations grammatical errors. grammatical error
10 grammatical errors.
• Compliance to the FYP and does not observed and does Correct citations with proper
Correct citations
standard/guideline follow the FYP not follow the FYP observed and follow citations and
observed and follow
guidelines at all guidelines at all the FYP guidelines compliance to FYP
the FYP guidelines
guidelines
Max. Marks 100.00 Total WMO ==>
Total WMO.PRS (after normalizing with the following weighted percentage of ) ==> WMO x 15%

EEE610 (ENGINEER IN SOCIETY) EVALUATION FORM FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, UiTM Hj Ir. HARIZAN CHE MAT HARIS Wednesday, March 07, 2018