Sl.

Study Footing Type Reinforcement Optimum Parameters Found

No. Type
u/B h/B d/B h/d Pattern Relative BPR b/B
density
(%)
1 2001, S. K. Dash, Rectangular Geocell 0, 0.1, 1.2, 2.0, 1.2,1. 0.3, 0.53, Chevron 30, 40, 8 8
K. Rajaggopal and footing Geocell+ 0.25, 0.5, 2.75 5, 2.7 0.67, 1.33, 50, 60,
N.R. krishnaswamy 330X100X25 mm geogrid 0.75, 1.0, 1.67, 70,
1.5 1.2,2.0,
2.75 2.29, 2.62
2 2001, S. K. Dash, Rectangular geocell 0.1 2.0 - - chevron 70 7.2 8
K. Rajaggopal and footing
N.R. krishnaswamy 330X100X25 mm
3 1999 K. Rajagopal*, Triaxial test geocell with - - - 2, 4, 4.3, - - -
N.R. Krishnaswamy, 100 mm d, different 4.83
G. MadhaviLatha 200mm h. material
4 2008 S. K. Dash, Rectangular geocell 0.0, 0.1, 0.8, 1.6, 1.2, chevron 1, 2, 4, 6,
P.D.T. Reddy and footing 0.25, 0.5, 2.0, 1.5, 2.7 8, 10, 12
S.T.G. Raghukanth 330X100X25 mm 0.75, 1.0, 2.75,
1.5 3.14
5 2000 N. R. Rectangular geocell with 0, 0.25,
Krishnaswamy, K. different 0.375,
Rajagopal and G. material
Madhavi Latha 0.5, 0.625
6 2002 S. K. Dash, S. Circular geocell 1.4, 2.8,
Sireesh and T. G. 150mm dia 4
Sitharam
7 2007 Sujit Kumar Rectangular geocell 0.0, 0.1, 0.8,1.2, 1.2, 1, 2, 4,
Dash, K. Rajagopal, footing 0.25, 0.5, 1.6, 2.0, 1.5, 2.7 6, 8, 10,
and N.R. 330X100X25 mm 0.75, 1.0, 2.75, 12
Krishnaswamy 1.5 3.14
8 2008 S. Sireesh , Circular 0.6, 1.2, 1.3, 1.9,
T.G. Sitharam, Sujit 150mmdia 1.8, 2.4, 2.5, 3.1,
Kumar Dash 3.7, 4.3,
3.0,
3.6 4.9, 5.5
9 2016 Arghadeep Circular Geocell, 0.53, 2.3
Biswas, S.M; A. 150 mm dia Geocell+
Murali Krishna and
1.05,
geogrid 1.57;
Sujit Kumar Dash
2.09
10 2013 A. Biswas, A. Circular Geocell 0.53,
Murali Krishna and 150 mm dia 1.05,
S. K. Dash 1.57,
2.09
11

Where,

u= placement depth of the first layer reinforcement

B= width of the footing.

h= height of geocell.
d= pocket size of the geocell