Name HL/SL A1 B1 C1 D1 E1 A2 B2 C2

HL 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 Sravani Battula

HL 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 Anshika

HL 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1

3 Shefali Hirani

4 Praneetha Indukkuri HL 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1

5 Akshat Jain HL 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2

6 Radha Konda HL 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1
 7 Tanisha HL 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2

8 Aris manasia HL 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1

9 Aman Nurani HL 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2

10 Nanajiba Golam HL 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1

11 Advait Surana HL 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1

12 Kousthuba HL 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 2

13 Anish SL 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

14 Aarish SL 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

15 Vimal SL 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2

16 Himanssh SL 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2

17 Rudra SL 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2
 Criterion-wise marks for Economics IA with Comments.
D2 E2 A3 B3 C3 D3 E3 Criterion F Total

2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 37

2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 37

1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 27

2 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 26

2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 37

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 28
2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 35

2 3 2 1 2 2 3 3 32

2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 39

1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 27

1 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 26

2 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 31

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 34

2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 37

2 3 3 2 2 2 4 3 40

2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 37

2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 36
ments.

The student has used economic terms and a few key terms have defined . The diagrams are used
properly with valid explanations . Student has integrated with the economic thoeries. Overall
commentaries, theoritical explanation of economic theory is very good.The linkage between the
theory and the article is evident and there is good analysis in most of the cases. Application of
theory/information given in the article in the commentary is good. There is evaluation or given
supportive evidences or arguments with enough explanation .Articles were selected from 3
different sources and the commentaries are written in less than 750 words.

The student has used adequate diagrams and explained the diagrams in detail. There is evidence of
effective use of vocabulary with the definitons. The students has used adequate economic theories in
different contrext thourgh out the portfolio in connection with the articles selected .The application of
theories and data from the article was evident with clear appplication of economic theories. .Articles were
selected from 3 different sources and the commentaries are written in less than 750 words.

The student has used relevant economic terminologies and defined. The diagrams are labelled explained in micro
and international IAs. Used the relevant diagrams ad explained in detail .The application of theories and data from
the article was evident with clear appplication of economic theories. Evaluations are limited and not supported with
valid reasoning. Articles were selected from 3 different sources and one commentary is exeeding the word limit.

There is detailed explanation of diagrams with examples . The diagrams were well labelled and explained effectively . There is
evident of good subject knowledge and effective analysis through out the portfolio/commentaries . Clear application of
economic theories are evident and there is effective analysis . Most of the arguments are supported by evidences or
examples . Articles were taken from 3 different sources and the commentaries are written in 750 or less than 750.
Student has developed the Ias, using good economics vocabulary. Applied the information given in the article to explain the
economic theory. All the commentaries were written within the word limit and time limit.
Student has explained the theories, but limited application of the data/information and evaluations were given with limited
reasoning. Fulfils the criterion F conditions.
Student has used the articles from different sources and followed the structure of the commentary within the permissible
word limit. Key terminologies were explained and has evaluated the scenarios, using the relevant economic theories.The data
or the information given in the news articlw has been used to explain and evluate the economic theories.
Though the diagrams are used, limited in explanations and key trminologies were included, not effectively used throughout.
Time period, sources and word count within the permissible limit.

Student has written the commentaries, keepin the crteria in mind and used the economics vocabulries trhough out and
explained the theory with appropriate diagrams. The evaluation also has done effectivelhy. The time period, sources and word
count fulfil the Criterin F.
Theorotically vague and very limited application and use of diagram. Evaluations giver are not supported with valid reasoning.
Ful and

The macro economics commentary doesn't cover much macro economics concept. Mostly dealing with micro economics.

Though the attempts are made to evlauate, not effective. Analysed the details given in the article well. Not very ev=ffective in
using the key terminologies effectively throughout. The sources, word limit and time period are acceptable.
Used economics vocabulary to explain the concepts and has made an attempt to evlaute, though limited in dtails. The word
limit , sources and time period selected are within the acceptable limit.

Student has written the commentaries, keepin the crteria in mind and used the economics vocabulries trhough out and
explained the theory with appropriate diagrams. The evaluation also has done effectivelhy. The time period, sources and word
count fulfil the Criterin F.

Student has written the commentaries, keepin the crteria in mind and used the economics vocabulries trhough out and
explained the theory with appropriate diagrams. The evaluation also has done effectivelhy. The time period, sources and word
count fulfil the Criterin F.

Student has written the commentaries, keepin the crteria in mind and used the economics vocabulries trhough out and
explained the theory with appropriate diagrams. The evaluation also has done effectivelhy. The time period, sources and word
count fulfil the Criterin F.

Student has written the commentaries, keepin the crteria in mind and used the economics vocabulries trhough out and
explained the theory with appropriate diagrams. The evaluation also has done effectivelhy. The time period, sources and word
count fulfil the Criterin F.