ML-PRD01-EnG-CCAL-0113 - Rev 3 - Calculation Sheet For Pipe Support Wellpad ML-A

CONSORTIUM OF :
CALCULATION SHEET FOR PIPE SUPPORT WELLPAD ML-A
Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

ML-PRD01-ENG-CCAL-0113 RH 3 14000011-OS-10101
PROJECT : MUARA LABOH GEOTHERMAL POWER PROJECT

STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT EPC CONTRACT
OWNER : PT. SUPREME ENERGY MUARA LABOH (SEML)
LOCATION : MUARA LABUH, SOLOK SELATAN, SUMATERA

BARAT, INDONESIA
D.M
B. Muamar /
3 Issued for Use 26/11/2018 Turnip V.P.Utomo
R.Akmar
/N.Izzah
D.M
B. Muamar /
2 Issued for Use 24/10/2018 Turnip V.P.Utomo
R.Akmar
/N.Izzah
B. Muamar /
1 Issued for Use 10/07/2018 D.M Turnip V.P.Utomo
R.Akmar
...Consortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 1 of 26...

B. Muamar /
0 Issued for Information 24/04/2018 D.M Turnip V.P.Utomo
R.Akmar
Rev Status Date Prepared Checked Approved
...Consortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 2 of 26...


TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. GENERAL 4
1.1 OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE 4
1.2 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY 4
1.3 APPLICABLE SPECIFICATION, CODES, AND STANDARDS 4
1.4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES 5
1.5 SOIL PROPERTIES 5
1.6 UNIT OF MEASUREMENT 5
1.7 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 5
PART I FILLED COMPOSITE STRUCTURE 6

2. OUTLINE 6
2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
3. DESIGN LOAD 6
3.1 DEAD LOAD 6
3.2 PIPING LOAD 6
3.3 WIND LOAD 7
3.4 EARTHQUAKE LOAD 8
3.5 LOAD COMBINATION 8
4. ANALYSIS OF FILLED COMPOSITE HSS 10

4.1 MATERIAL 10
4.2 SLENDERNESS 11
4.3 AXIAL AND FLEXURAL CAPACITY 11
4.4 SHEAR CAPACITY 13
4.5 TORSION CAPACITY 13
4.6 DEFLECTION 14
5. BORED PILE 14
5.1 AXIAL CAPACITY 14
5.2 LATERAL CAPACITY 15
5.3 REINFORCEMENT 18
PART II STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURE 21

6. OUTLINE 21
6.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 21
6.2 DIMENSION 21
7. DESIGN LOAD 22
7.1 DEAD LOAD 22
...aaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 2 of 38


7.2 PIPING LOAD 22

7.3 WIND LOAD 22
7.4 SEISMIC LOAD
8. ANALYSIS RESULT 23
8.1 STRESS RATIO 23
8.2 CHECK OF BEARING CAPACITY 23
8.3 CHECK OF OVERTURNING 24
8.4 CHECK OF SLIDING 25
9. REINFORCEMENT DESIGN 25
9.1 FOOTING REINFORCEMENT 25
9.2 PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT 26
PART III STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR PS-SPA-2011 28
PART IV FOUNDATION SUPPORT FOR PS-SPA-1025 ~ PS-SPA-1030 and PS-SPA-1040 ~ PS-SPA-1042

10. OUTLINE 31
10.2 DIMENSION 31
10.3 DEFINE SPRING CONSTANT 31
11. DESIGN LOAD 32

11.1 DEAD LOAD 32
11.2 PIPING LOAD 32
11.3 SEISMIC LOAD 33
12. ANALYSIS RESULT 33

12.1 PIPING LOAD 33
12.2 CHECK OF OVERTURNING 34
12.3 CHECK OF SLIDING 34
12.4 STRESS RATIO CHECK

13.1 FOOTING REINFORCEMENT 35
13.2 PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT 37
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT - A ADDITIONAL BREAK-UP STRENGTH CALCULATION FOR
FOUNDATION TYPE-8
ATTACHMENT - 1 SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULT
ATTACHMENT - 2 SUMMARY TABLE OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES


ATTACHMENT - 3 SUMMARY TABLE DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE

ATTACHMENT - 4 SUMMARY TABLE DESIGN OF BORED PILE
ATTACHMENT - 5 PIPING LOADING DATA


1. GENERAL
1.1 OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE
Project : MUARA LABOH GEOTHERMAL POWER PROJECT
Employer : PT. SUPREME ENERGY MUARA LABOH (SEML)
Location : MUARA LABUH, SOLOK SELATAN, SUMATERA
BARAT, INDONESIA
Structure : PIPE SUPPORT SGS WELLPAD ML-A
1.2 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

The purpose of this calculation is to design Pipe Support for line in area Wellpad ML-A.
This calculation consist of 2 parts that present the calculation of 2 general type of pipe support.
Part 1 will present the calculation for pipe support with filled composite structure, mainly used for
pipeline DN250 (10"), DN450 (18"), DN500 (20"), DN600 (24"), and DN1050 (42").
Part 2 in general will demonstrate the calculation for steel pipe support (without filled composite)
mainly used for small pipe line DN100 (4"). Then Part 3 is special for steel support of PS-SPA-2011
In part 1, pipe support consists of bored pile as bottom structure and filled composite structure of
HSS (Hollow Steel Structure) as upper structure.
Filled composite structure will use pipe material filled with concrete without reinforcement to restrain
all external load that yield from pipe movement including wind load and seismic load.
Since this structure is simply cantilever, the concrete will be filled upto near the cutoff point where
the column and beam is jointed and welded. The beam of support that the pipe shoe will stand will
not be filled with concrete and will be designed as steel only without composite action.
To account the limitation to the condition that concrete is not filled fully to beam structure, this
composite action will only account to flexural strength only, while the axial and shear capacity
of structure is calculated from streel structure only.
Combined axial and flexural load together will be calculated to check the stress ratio and shall be
less than 1.
All the steel design and filled composite design is calculated based on AISC 360 (Specification for
Structural Steel Buildings) using Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) method.
Bored pile concrete will be calculated using LRFD method of ACI 318, while the soil capacity
will be calculated using Allowable Stress Design (ASD).
In part 2, steel pipe support will be calculated using AISC 360 LRFD Method and the soil bearing
capacity will be calculated using Allowable Stress Design (ASD).
1.3 APPLICABLE SPECIFICATION, CODES, AND STANDARDS

1.3.1 Project Specification
ML-PRD01-ENG-SCPC-0001 Design Specification for Civil and Structural
1.3.2 Codes and Standards
ACI 318M-11 Building Code Requirement for Reinforced
Concrete and Commentary
...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 4 of 38


AISC 360-10 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
SNI 1726:2012 Procedure of Earthquake Resistant Design for
Building and Non Building Structures
ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other
Structures
1.4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES
1.4.1 Concrete
Concrete compresive strength for general fc' = 30 MPa
Reinforced concrete specific gravity γc = 23.5 kN/m3
1.4.2 Reinforcing Steel Bar
Deformed bar reinforcement yield strength fyd = 390 MPa
Plain bar reinforcement yield strength fyp = 235 MPa
1.4.3 Steel
Steel yield strength fy = 250 MPa
Steel specific gravity γs = 76.98 kN/m3
1.4.4 Other Materials
Water specific gravity γw = 9.8 kN/m3
Soil density γsoil = 16.0 kN/m3
1.5 SOIL PROPERTIES

Sondir test used for design CPT = C-1 & C2
Allowable soil bearing capacity for shallow fdn. Qall = 40 KPa
= 40.0 kN/m2
Angle of internal friction ф = 23.0 deg
1.6 UNIT OF MEASUREMENT

Unit of measurement in design shall be in metric system.
1.7 COMPUTER SOFTWARE

- Microsoft Excel (Spreadsheet)


PART I FILLED COMPOSITE STRUCTURE

2. OUTLINE
General arrangement of pipe support is shown below.
500 500
Note:
- h design of steel column is increased as much as 300mm for discrepancy of actual ground level
- Eccentricity of pipe from the center line of column as much as 200mm will be used for
additional load
3 DESIGN LOAD
3.1 DEAD LOAD
Self Weight
Structure dead load consist of steel column filled with concrete and steel beam.


3.2 PIPING LOAD
Piping load (magnitude and direction) is influenced by its piping restraint. There are 4 types of restrain
that will be used along the pipeline:
1. Anchor: restrain the movement in x, y, and z direction of translational and rotational.
This support will restrain load fx, fy, fz, mx, my, mz.
2. Guide: restrain the movement in the perpendicular direction of pipe (lateral movement).
This support will restrain load fy, fz.
3. Stopper: restrain the movement in the parallel direction of pipe (axial movement).
This support will restrain load fx, fz.
4. Resting: restrain only the gravity load from pipe, but will restrain small portion of load fx, fy, fz.
fx : axial force, along the direction of flow on the pipe

fy : lateral force, perpendicular to the direction of flow on the pipe
fz : vertical load, gravity direction
Combination of support type above will be made to achieve allowable stress at pipe itself.
Sources of external load from piping is generated from:

1. Thermal: create expansion and contraction along the pipe to yield external load to pipe support.
2. Wind load: subjected to pipe support and pipe itself (will be explained in the next section)
3. Earthquake: subjected to pipe support and pipe itself (will be explained in the next section)
4. Slug force: force that occurred when 2 phase condition inside the pipe
5. Dead load: the weight of pipe itself and its fluid content, including the insulation and other
accessories.
To achieve consistent transformation of load direction from Piping to Civil, both discipline use local
coordinate. Piping will hand over the load using local coordinate that will be used directly
by Civil, since pipe material is used as Column. Hence load from piping will be similar if transferred
to pipe column since it has symetrical axis from any direction.
Local coordinate for both Piping and Civil can be ilustrated for piping plan below. Local coordinate is
changed in accordance with pipe arrangement. Direction z is not shown (gravity direction).
y
y
x
x y
3.3 WIND LOAD


Wind load calculation refer to ASCE 7 - 10.
As input basis for the software, the following parameters are presented below:
Basic wind speed = 43 m/s
Wind exposure = 2
Structural damping = 0.03
Importance factor = 1
This wind effect will be simulated and modeled using software of pipe stress analysis and simulate
the effect of wind to pipeline and its support together. Piping discipline will conduct the analysis
using software CESAR III.
3.4 EARTHQUAKE LOAD

Seismic design shall use seismic parameters from ML-PRD01-ENG-CRPT-0004 Seismic Report
and the design seismic load is calculated based on document ML-PRD01-ENG-CCAL-0098
Seismic Coefficient For SGS.
The structure will be designed as cantilever or inverted pendulum (1 leg support).
The coefficient of seismic acceleration for pipe support shall be:

Cs = 0.636 g (Ultimate Strength Method)
While the coefficient of seismic acceleration for piping stress shall be:
Cs = 0.445 g (Working Stress Method)
This seismic acceleration will be simulated and modeled using software of pipe stress analysis and
simulate the effect of seismic to pipeline and its support together. Discipline Piping will conduct the
analysis using software CESAR III.
3.5 LOAD COMBINATION

To simplify the calculation, extreme load combination will be chosen as representative to check the
strength and serviceability of pipe support.
Selected Load Combination for Working Stress Method (Allowable Stress Design)
Load Combination for the Design of Soil Bearing Pressure (Working Stress Method
as per ASCE 7-10 Section 2.4.1)
No. Load Combination

1 1D + 1T D = Dead Load
2 1D + 1T + 0.6W1 T = Thermal Load
3 1D + 1T + 0.6W2 W = Wind Load (4 Directions)
4 1D + 1T + 0.6W3 E = Earthquake Load (4 Directions)
5 1D + 1T + 0.6W4 S = Slug Force (7 Conditions)


6 1D + 1T + 0.7E1
7 1D + 1T + 0.7E2
8 1D + 1T + 0.7E3
9 1D + 1T + 0.7E4
10 1D + 1T + 0.7S1
11 1D + 1T + 0.7S2
12 1D + 1T + 0.7S3
13 1D + 1T + 0.7S4
14 1D + 1T + 0.7S5
15 1D + 1T + 0.7S6
16 1D + 1T + 0.7S7
Selected Load Combination for Ultimate Strength Method (Load and Resistance Factor Design)
Load Combination for the Design of Steel and Concrete Structure (Ultimate Strength Design
Method as per ASCE 7-10 Section 2.3.2)
No. Load Combination

1 1.4D D = Dead Load
2 1.2D + 1.2T T = Thermal Load
3 1.2D + 1.2T + 1W1 W = Wind Load (4 Directions)
4 1.2D + 1.2T + 1W2 E = Earthquake Load (4 Directions)
5 1.2D + 1.2T + 1W3 S = Slug Force (7 Conditions)
6 1.2D + 1.2T + 1W4
7 1.2D + 1.2T + 1E1
8 1.2D + 1.2T + 1E2
9 1.2D + 1.2T + 1E3
10 1.2D + 1.2T + 1E4
11 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S1
12 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S2
13 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S3
14 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S4
15 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S5
16 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S6
17 1.2D + 1.2T + 1S7
18 0.9D + 0.9T + 1W1


19 0.9D + 0.9T + 1W2
20 0.9D + 0.9T + 1W3
21 0.9D + 0.9T + 1W4
22 0.9D + 0.9T + 1E1
23 0.9D + 0.9T + 1E2
24 0.9D + 0.9T + 1E3
25 0.9D + 0.9T + 1E4
26 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S1
27 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S2
28 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S3
29 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S4
30 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S5
31 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S6
32 0.9D + 0.9T + 1S7
4 ANALYSIS OF FILLED COMPOSITE HSS

4.1 MATERIAL
The material used for column and beam are presented below. Altough not all of this size
will be used (depends on external load), this material is planned to be used for design.
Dimension (mm)
Pipe Schedule
OD ID t
8" STD STD 219.1 202.74 8.18 OD = Outside diameter
10" STD STD 273.1 254.56 9.27 ID = Inside diameter
12" STD STD 323.9 304.84 9.53 t = Wall thickness
14" STD STD 355.6 336.54 9.53
Section I AISC 360 require to check the local slenderness of pipe section. All the pipe mentioned
in the table above falls to "Compact" type (there isn't local buckling) for compression and flexural
action.
Compression
Pipe λ λp λr Max
Status
D/t 0.15E/fy 0.19E/fy 0.31E/fy


8" STD 26.8 125 158 258 Compact
10" STD 29.5 125 158 258 Compact
12" STD 34.0 125 158 258 Compact
14" STD 37.3 125 158 258 Compact
Flexural
Pipe λ λp λr Max
Status
D/t 0.09E/fy 0.31E/fy 0.31E/fy
8" STD 26.8 75 258 258 Compact
10" STD 29.5 75 258 258 Compact
12" STD 34.0 75 258 258 Compact
14" STD 37.3 75 258 258 Compact
λ = Steel pipe section compactness

λp = Limit to non compact section
λr = Limit to slender section
4.2 SLENDERNESS
The length of steel column will affect the slenderness and hence affect the total axial capacity
of pipe support.
The slenderness will be calculated using:
λ = K.L/r < 200
where:
λ = Slenderness of steel support
K = effective length factor, for cantilever K = 2
L = length of steel column, taken max L = 2.5 m
r = radius gyration of steel section
In this case, column pipe 8" of 2.5m height will be asessed to consider the maximum slenderness
of support:
OD = 219 mm ID = 203 mm


t = 8.18 mm
I �(��^4−��^4 )/64
= �(𝑂𝐷^4−𝐼𝐷^4 )/64 = 30144075 mm4
A = 5417.7004 mm2
r = √(𝐼/𝐴) = 74.6 mm
KL/r = 67.0 < 200
Since the slenderness KL/r is less than 200, all design steel columns fall to category short column.
Altough the slenderness effect is still present, it can be negligible to simplify the calculation.
4.3 AXIAL AND FLEXURAL CAPACITY

Based on the slenderness of pipe section that falls into "Compact" section, all the axial and
flexural capacity of pipe support will be based on "Compact" formula stated in AISC 360.
Axial Capacity
Axial capacity is calculated using formula below that only consider steel area of pipe,
without considering the composite action from concrete.
Pn = As x fy
Where As = Area of steel pipe

fy = Yield strength of pipe
Reduced axial capacity: Ø Pn

Where Ø = 0.90
Flexural Capacity
Flexural capacity will consider the composite action of concrete and steel pipe.
The AISC 360 let the user to choose any method to determine the flexural capacity of this composite
action. The method used below is using Plastic Stress Distribution Method and the equation is taken
from AISC Design Examples 14.
Mn = Mp = Zsb x fy + 0.95 x fc x Zcb

2


Where Mp = Flexural capacity of fully plastic section of composite area

Zsb = Modulus section of steel pipe
= (OD3 - ID3) sin (Ø/2)
6
Zcb = Modulus section of concrete
= h3 sin3 (Ø/2)
6
h = Diameter of concrete
Ø = Degree of compression section of composite section when fully plastic
= 0.026 Kc - 2Ks + (0.026Kc + 2Ks)2 + 0.857 Kc Ks)1/2 (Rad)
0.0848Kc 0.0848Kc
Kc = Coefficient of concrete
= fc' ID2
Ks = Coefficient of steel
= fy (d-t) t
2
fy = Yield strength of steel
d = Inside diameter of steel pipe
t = wall thickness
Reduced flexural capacity: Ø Mn

Where Ø = 0.90
Combined Axial & Flexural Capacity

The interaction between axial and flexural capacity for "Compact" section is allowed to be taken
from section H1.1 AISC 360:
When Pr/Pc ≥ 0.2

Pr + 8 Mr ≤ 1
Pc 9 Mc
When Pr/Pc < 0.2
Pr + Mr ≤ 1
2Pc Mc
Where Pr = Ultimate axial force of pipe support

Pc = Nominal axial capacity of pipe support


Mr = Ultimate flexural force of pipe support
Mc = Nominal flexural capacity of pipe support
4.4 SHEAR CAPACITY

Nominal shear capacity is calculated from pipe steel structure only, while the shear capacity from
concrete is neglected.
Vn = Fcr x Ag / 2
Fcr shall be the larger of:
But Fcr shall not exceed 0.6fy
Where:
Lv = Distance from maximum to zero shear force, in this case taken as 2m maximum
E = Young's modulus elasticity of steel
t = Wall thickness
D = Outside diameter of steel structure
4.5 TORSION CAPACITY

Nominal torsion capacity is calculated from pipe steel structure only, while the torsion capacity from
concrete is neglected.
Tn = Fcr x C
Fcr shall be the larger of:
But Fcr shall not exceed 0.6fy
Where:
L = Length of member
E = Young's modulus elasticity


t = Wall thickness
D = Outside diameter of steel structure
C = HSS Torsional constant, for pipe use:
=
4.6 DEFLECTION
Deflection from external loads will be analyzed and compared with allowable deflection.
Since most of the steel structure will be cantilever type, the formula for cantilever below will be
used to check the deflection. The stiffness of cantilever will come from compsoite action of
concrete and steel
�=𝑉 𝐿^3/(3𝐸_𝑠 (𝐼_𝑠+(𝐼_𝑐 𝐸_𝑐)/𝐸_𝑠 ))
Where:
δ = Deflection of support
V = Lateral load
L = Height of support
Ec = Modulus elasticity of concrete
Es = Modulus elasticity of steel
Is = Second moment inertia of steel pipe
Ic = Second moment inertia of concrete inside steel pipe
Lateral deflection imposed by seismic load shall be amplified by Cd. Cantilever support as stated
in ASCE 7-10 has Cd = 2.
Allowable deflection of support for operational load will be:

δall = L/240
While the allowable deflection of support for occational load (earthquake) will be:
δall = 0.02L
5 BORED PILE
5.1 AXIAL CAPACITY
Axial capacity for cohessive soil is determined from friction capacity and end bearing.
a. End Bearing Capacity, Qb
Qb = (Nc.cu) Ab


Where: Nc = Bearing capacity factor = 9
cu = Undrained shear strength = su = qc/Nk = 50 kPa = 0.5 kg/cm2
Ab = Area of pile base
b. Friction Capacity, Qs
Qs = α. Cu. (π. D. L)
Where: α = factor adhesion = 0.55 (for bored pile)

Cu = Undrained shear strength = su = 50 kPa = 0.5 kg/cm2
D = diameter of bored pile
L = depth of bored pile
Total ultimate axial capacity of bored pile:
Qu = Qb + Qs
= (Nc.cu) Ab + α. Cu. (π. D. L)
Allowable axial capacity is reduced using safety factor SF = 3

Qa = Qu / 3
5.2 LATERAL CAPACITY

Lateral capacity is designed based on Brom's theory for bored pile in cohessive soil.
Determination of the capacity is using formula below. For this design, bored pile type
that will be used are free head type (Type 1 and Type 2) and fixed head type (Type 3).
Free Head Pile
Short pile
For short free head pile in cohessive soil, the lateral capacity is calculated using formula:


Long pile
For long free head pile in cohessive soil, the lateral capacity is calculated using formula:
where:
Hu = lateral capacity of bored pile
su = Undrained shear strength = su = 50 kPa = 0.5 kg/cm2
Ds = diameter of bored pile
L = length of bored pile
f = height of pipe support above ground level
fo = unsupported length of bored pile in cohessive soil, fo = 0.6m
Mult = nominal moment capacity of reinforced concrete bored pile, defined in the next section
Long pile is defined if Mmax (maximum moment from soil-bored pile interaction) is greater than
Mult (nominal moment capacity of bored pile). Otherwhise, the bored piles are defined as short pile.
Maximum moment Mmax, is calculated using:
Fixed Head Pile


Short pile
For short fixed head pile in cohessive soil, the lateral capacity is calculated using formula:
Pile head moment for short pile:
If Mmax is greater than Mult (nominal moment capacity of pile), case below is appropriate.
Intermediate Pile
For intermediate fixed head pile in cohessive soil, the lateral capacity is calculated using formula:
Pile head moment for intermediate pile:
If Mmax is greater than Mult (nominal moment capacity of pile), case below is appropriate.
Long Pile
For long fixed head pile in cohessive soil, the lateral capacity is calculated using formula:
Ultimate lateral capacity, Hu, will be designed for two type of boring size: D600 and D800
with depth of L = 5 m and L=3 m for all bored pile.
Reduction Factor in Slope Area

To consider the effect of soil slope in certain areas, the reduction factor will be made to calculated
lateral capacity above.
Reese's approach (1958) that was based on full-scale test is choosen to calculate the reduction
factor that is presented below:


Hur = Hu x 1
(1+ tan θ)
where:
Hur = Reduced lateral capacity
Hu = Lateral capacity, calculated from Brom's formula
θ = Slope angle
Reduction Factor of Pile Group

Reduction factor to consider the pile group effect will be accounted in the design. This reduction
factor is based on the distance between center to center of bored pile.
No. Distance C-C bored pile Reduction factor

1 4D 1
2 3D 0.7
Reduction Factor for Brom's formula

Reduction factor to consider working stress design
Hu = Hu (brom formula) x 0.7
5.3 REINFORCEMENT
The nominal capacity of bored pile D600 & D800 is presented below. The capacity of bored pile
below is used to categorize the bored pile type, wheter falls to short pile or long pile.
Bored Pile D600

Bored Pile Diameter D = 600
Reinforcement = 12 D 16
Nominal capacity Mn = 190 KN.m


Bored Pile D800



Bored Pile D1000



PART II STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURE

6 OUTLINE
This calculation only show an example that consider the maximum load and has maximum height of pipe
support. The calculation below show the steps to determine the required dimension, reinforcement,
external load to pipe support, and stability checking.
z
bp = 500 mm
x
dp = 500 mm
ho = 0.5OD 4" = 50 mm


hs = 3317 mm (max.)
ha = 300 mm
GL
hb = 300 mm
tf = 300 mm
L = 1000 mm
Section
6.2 DIMENSION
Pedestal width bp = 0.5 m
Pedestal length dp = 0.5 m
Pedestal height above GL ha = 0.3 m
Pedestal height below GL hb = 0.3 m
Max steel support height hs = 3.317 m
Height of 1/2 OD of pipe 4" ho = 0.05 m
Foundation thickness tf = 0.3 m
Total pedestal height hp = 0.6 m
Foundation length L = 1.5 m
Foundation width B = 1.5 m
Area of pedestal Ap = 0.25 m2

Area of foundation Af = 2.25 m2
7 DESIGN LOAD
7.1 DEAD LOAD
Foundation weight wf = 19.4 kN
Soil weight above footing ws = 9.6 kN
Total dead load w = 29.0 kN
7.2 PIPING LOAD
Maximum load is shown in table below:

Piping Load P (kN) Thx (kN) Thz (kN)
Operating/Test 2.6 2.75 0
Operating/Test 2.6 0 2.7


7.3 WIND LOAD

Wind load that was calculated using software CESAR II is presented below:
Wind Load Lateral (kN)
Load 1.2
7.4 SEISMIC LOAD

Seismic load that was calculated using software CESAR II is presented below:
Seismic Load Lateral (kN)
Load 2.75
8 ANALYSIS RESULT
8.1 STRESS RATIO
From analysis result, the maximum stress ratio:
r = 0.746 < 1 OK


8.2 CHECK OF BEARING CAPACITY

The maximum bearing pressure is calculated using formula below:
Fy Mx Mz
Qact = ± ±
Af Wz Wx
where :
W = Section Modulus
Wx = (𝐿×𝐵^2)/6
= 0.563 m3
Wz = (𝐵×𝐿^2)/6
= 0.563 m3
Load P/A Mz/Wz Mx/Wx Qmax Qmin

Load Combination
Fx (kN) Fy (kN) Fz (kN) kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2
1 2.75 31.62 0.00 14.05 1.47 0.00 15.52 12.59
1D
2 0.00 31.62 2.70 14.05 0.00 1.44 15.49 12.61
3 3.29 31.62 0.00 14.05 1.75 0.00 15.81 12.30
1 D + 0.45 Wx
4 0.00 31.62 2.70 14.05 0.00 1.44 15.49 12.61
5 4.21 31.62 0.00 14.05 2.24 0.00 16.30 11.81
1 D + 0.53 Vx
6 0.00 31.62 2.70 14.05 0.00 1.44 15.49 12.61
7 2.75 31.62 1.46 14.05 1.47 0.78 16.30 11.81
1 D + 0.53 Vz
8 0.00 18.97 4.16 8.43 0.00 2.22 10.65 6.21
9 2.37 18.97 0.00 8.43 1.26 0.00 9.70 7.17
0.6 D + 0.6 Wx
10 1.65 18.97 1.62 8.43 0.88 0.86 10.18 6.69
11 3.58 18.97 0.00 8.43 1.91 0.00 10.34 6.52
0.6 D + 0.7 Vx
12 1.93 18.97 1.62 8.43 1.03 0.86 10.32 6.54
13 1.65 18.97 1.93 8.43 0.88 1.03 10.34 6.52
0.6 D + 0.7 Vz
14 0.00 18.97 3.85 8.43 0.00 2.05 10.48 6.38
Permanent Condition
Qmax = 15.52 < 40.00 kN/m2 (OK)
Qmin = 12.59 > 0.00 kN/m2 (OK)
Temporary Condition
Qmax = 16.30 < 53.20 kN/m2 (OK)
Qmin = 6.21 > 0.00 kN/m2 (OK)


8.3 CHECK OF OVERTURNING

Safety factor for overturning = 1.5
Maximum overturning moment is calculated as maximum force times (Ha+Hb)
Resistance from Soil Passive Pressure

Soil Friction Angle, φ = 26.0 °
Effective Soil Friction Angle, φ' = 17.3 ° (2/3 from φ)
Coefficient Passive Pressure Kp =
 ' 
tan 2  45  
 2
Kp = 1.85
Soil cohesion c = 20 ton/m2
Effective Soil cohesion c' = 13.3 ton/m2
Lateral passive earth pressure is calculated as

 'p   0' K p  2c ' K p
Summary of lateral earth pressure is shown in table below.
No. Depth (m) Kp c' (ton/m2) σp' (KN/m) Mark
1 0 1.85 13.33 36.26 Pedestal
2 0.3 1.85 13.33 45.13 Pedestal
3 0.6 1.85 13.33 54.01 Footing
hb Pp1
tf Pp2 1/3 hb + tf
1/3 tf
Total soil passive pressure for pedestal, Pp1

= 12.21 KN/m
= 6.10 KN (for width of pedestal B=0.4m)
Total soil passive pressure for footing, Pp2
= 14.87 KN/m
= 22.31 KN (for width of footing B=1m)
Z-direction
Overturning Moment Mx = 17.74 KN.m (Fz x (ho+hs+hb+ha+tf))
Resistance Moment Mrx = P x 0.5B + Pp1 x (1/3hb+tf) + Pp2 x 1/3tf


= 28.39 KN.m
Safety Factor SFx = 1.60
Status = OK..!! SFx > 1.5
X-direction
Overturning Moment Mz = 17.95 KN.m (Fx x (ho+hs+hb+ha+tf))
Resistance Moment Mrx = P x 0.5L + Pp1 x (1/3hb+tf) + Pp2 x 1/3tf
= 28.39 KN.m
Status = OK..!! SFz > 1.5
8.4 CHECK OF SLIDING

Safety factor for sliding is 1.5 Sfs = 1.5
Friction coef concrete and soil μ = 0.5
Lateral Force Hmax = 4.21 KN
Lateral Resistance Fr = Pm x μ + Pp1 + Pp2
= 37.90 KN
Safety factor SFs = Fr / Hmax
= 9.01
Status = OK..!! SF > 1.5
9 REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
Material Properties
Yield Strength of Rebar fy = 390 Mpa
Concrete compressive strength fc' = 30 MPa
9.1 FOOTING REINFORCEMENT

Maximum soil pressure q = 16.30 KN/m2
Length of moment arm a = 0.50 m
Moment ultimate at foundation (Mu)

= 1.4 x 1/2 x q x L^2 (Assume as cantilever due to point load)
= 2.85 KN.m
a
Footing length L = 1500 mm
Footing width B = 1500 mm
Thickness tf = 300 mm
Area Ag = 2250000 mm2
Concrete cover cc = 50 mm


Effective depth d = 250 mm
Longitudinal Reinforcement
Maximum moment Mu = 2.85 KN.m
Rn = Mu/(φ*b*d2) φ = 0.9
= 0.34 kg/cm2
0.85  f c '  2 Rn  = 0.000087

  1 1
fy  0.85  f c ' 
0.85 f c '  600 = 0.0253

 max  0.75  0.85 
fy  600  f 
 y 
ρ min = 0.0018 (For all layer)
"Exceed maximum" ,if ρ > ρmax

ρ ,if ρmax > ρ > ρmin
ρreq = ρmin ,if (4/3)ρ > ρmin > ρ → ρreq = 0.0001
1.33ρ ,if ρmin > (4/3)ρ > 0.5ρmin
0.5ρmin ,otherwise
As req = ρreq x b x d = 43.25 mm2

Use D13 - 200 → As = 663.66 mm2 > As req = 43.3 mm2 (OK)
9.2 PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT
Pedestal width bp = 500 mm

Pedestal length dp = 500 mm
Area Ag = 250000 mm2
Height of pedestal ha+hb = 0.6 m


Mz Mx
For Operation/Test fx fy fz KN.m KN.m
1 3.30 37.94 0.00 1.98 0.00
1.2 D
2 0.00 37.94 3.24 0.00 1.94
3 3.90 37.94 0.00 2.34 0.00
1.2 D + 0.5 Wx
4 0.60 37.94 3.24 0.36 1.94
5 4.50 37.94 0.00 2.70 0.00
1.2 D + 1 Wx
6 1.20 37.94 3.24 0.72 1.94
7 6.05 37.94 0.00 3.63 0.00
1.2 D + 1 Vx
8 2.75 37.94 3.24 1.65 1.94
9 3.30 37.94 2.75 1.98 1.65
1.2 D + 1 Vz
10 0.00 37.94 5.99 0.00 3.59
11 3.68 28.46 0.00 2.21 0.00
0.9 D + 1 Wx
12 1.20 28.46 2.43 0.72 1.46
13 5.23 28.46 0.00 3.14 0.00
0.9 D + 1 Vx
14 2.75 28.46 2.43 1.65 1.46
15 2.48 28.46 2.75 1.49 1.65
0.9 D + 1 Vz
16 0.00 28.46 5.18 0.00 3.11
Main (Longitudinal) Reinforcement
Axial load Pu = 37.9 KN
Reinforcement at pedestal will be calculated using interaction diagram, for combination of axial load
and bending moment. Diagram interaction for for required reinforcement is shown below.
Summary of Longitudinal Reinforcement

Dimension (mm) Area Reinforcement Percentage
No.
Width Length (mm2) n D As (mm2) %
1 500 500 250000 8 16 1608.4954 0.64%
Shear (Transversal) Reinforcement

Maximum shear forces Vu = Humax
= 6.05 KN (1.2 E + 1.0E(O))
Maximum axial load Nu = 3.6 KN (1.4D)


Concrete shear capacity Φ Vc = 0.75.(1+Nu/(14.Ag).1/6.√fc.bp.dpe

(subjected to axial load) = 77 KN
0.5*ΦVc = 39 KN
Status = 0.5*ΦVc > Vu, no need min shear reinforcement
Use minimal shear reinforcement φ10 @ 200
Status = OK! ΦVn > Vu
PART III STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR PS-SPA-2011
STAAD MODEL :
Description initialStaad
Column C1 R4 DN 300 XXS
Girder GX1 R2 DN 200 STD
Vertical brace VB1 R3 DN100 STD
LOADING
Load for this special support

Vertic 30 kN
Axial 8 kN
Latera 485 kN


STRSS RATIO
max ratio 0.52 < 1 ……….OK
DISPLACEMENT


̴̴
̴̴
Maximum displacement 1.43 mm
PART IV FOUNDATION SUPPORT FOR PS-SPA-1025 ~ PS-SPA-1030 and PS-SPA-1040 ~ PS-SPA-1042

10 OUTLINE
This calculation will presents the foundation design of pipe support as combined footing. Actual soil
condition is not suitable for deep foundation. Instead, shallow foundation will be used as alternative.
There will be 2 separated combined foundation in front of the wellpad:
Foundation 1
No. Pipe Support
1 PS-SPA-1025, PS-SPA-1026, PS-SPA-1027, PS-SPA-1040, PS-SPA-1041
Foundation 2
No. Pipe Support
1 PS-SPA-1028, PS-SPA-1029, PS-SPA-1030, PS-SPA-1042
The calculation below only shows the foundation 1, but the concept is same to design foundation 2.
A
2.1 m
z
x A'
18.30 m


x
Plan View
10" 10"
4"
1791 mm
200 mm GL
500 mm
300 mm
10.2 DIMENSION
Pedestal width bp = 0.4 m
Pedestal length dp = 0.4 m
Pedestal height above GL ha = 0.2 m
Pedestal height below GL hb = 0.5 m
Max steel support height hs = 1.791 m
Height of 1/2 OD of pipe 10" ho = 0.125 m
Foundation thickness tf = 0.3 m
Space c/c pedestal sp = varies m
Total number of pedestal n = 2 m
Total pedestal height hp = 0.7 m
Foundation length L = 16.5 m
Foundation width B = 2.1 m
Area of pedestal Ap = 0.16 m2

Total Area of pedestal Apt = 0.32 m2 (Ap x n)
Area of foundation Af = 34.65 m2
10.3 DEFINE SPRING CONSTANT
Qall = 40 KN/m2
SF = 3 A2
K = 40 . Qall . SF


= 4800 KN/m2
A3
Slab Area 1 A1 = 0.253 m2

Slab Area 2 A2 = 0.506 m2 A1
Slab Area 3 A3 = 1.01 m2
Coefficient Spring (KF)
KFx = 0.1 . K . A
KFy = K.A
KFz = 0.1 . K . A
Slab Area 1 Slab Area 2

KFx = 121.44 KN/m KFx = 242.88 KN/m
KFy = 1214.4 KN/m KFy = 2428.8 KN/m
KFz = 121.44 KN/m KFz = 242.88 KN/m
Slab Area 3
KFx = 484.8 KN/m
KFy = 4848 KN/m
KFz = 484.8 KN/m
11 DESIGN LOAD
11.1 DEAD LOAD
Foundation weight wf = 249.9 kN
Soil weight above footing ws = 274.6 kN
Total dead load w = 524.6 kN
11.2 PIPING LOAD

Maximum load is shown in table below:


11.3 SEISMIC LOAD

Seismic load that was calculated using software CESAR II is presented below:
Seismic Load For Pipe 42" = 51.56 KN

12 ANALYSIS RESULT
12.1 CHECK OF BEARING CAPACITY
Ac = 1 m2 (Slab mesh dimension from Staad Pro modelling)
Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz
Reaction Node L/C
KN KN KN KN.m KN.m KN.m


Max Fx 14 1258 3.7 11.6 0 0 0 0
Min Fx 14 1193 -3.9 20.5 -0.2 0 0 0
Max Fy 14 1196 -0.1 24 2.2 0 0 0
Min Fy 66 1260 0 1.3 0.4 0 0 0
Max Fz 97 1260 -0.1 14.2 2.2 0 0 0
Min Fz 97 1195 -0.1 18.9 -2.4 0 0 0
Max Compression qmax = 24.00 KN/m2 qall = 40.0 OK
Min Compression qmin = 1.30 KN/m2 qtall = 0 OK
12.2 CHECK OF OVERTURNING

Safety factor for overturning = 1.5
Maximum overturning moment is calculated as maximum force times (Fz x (ho+hs+hb+ha+tf))
Z-direction
Lateral force Fz = 20.99 KN (From Staad Pro)
Overturning Moment Mx = 61.21 KN.m (Fz x (ho+hs+hb+ha+tf))
Resistance Moment Mrx = w x 0.5B
= 550.80 KN.m
Status = OK..!! SFx > 1.5
X-direction
Lateral force Fx = 41.99 KN (From Staad Pro)
Overturning Moment Mz = 122.44 KN.m (Fx x (ho+hs+hb+ha+tf))
Resistance Moment Mrx = w x 0.5L
= 4327.69 KN.m
Status = OK..!! SFz > 1.5
12.3 CHECK OF SLIDING

Safety factor for sliding is 1.5 Sfs = 1.5
Friction coef concrete and soil μ = 0.5
Lateral Force Hmax = 41.99 KN
Lateral Resistance Fr = wxμ
= 262.28 KN
Safety factor SFs = Fr / Hmax
= 6.25
Status = OK..!! SF > 1.5


12.4 STRESS RATIO CHECK
Maximum Stress Ratio = 0.349 < 1 OK
13 REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
Material Properties
Yield Strength of Rebar fy = 390 Mpa
Concrete compressive strength fc' = 30 MPa
13.1 FOOTING REINFORCEMENT


X-Direction

= 1.4 x 1/8 x q x L^2 (Assume as beam due to uniform load)
= 90.03 KN.m
q
a

Rn = Mu/(φ*b*d2) φ = 0.9
= 16.01 kg/cm2
0.85  f c '  2 Rn 
 1 1 = 0.004
f y  0.85  f c ' 
0.85 f c '  600  = 0.0253

 max  0.75  0.85 
fy  600  f 
 y 

1.33ρ ,if ρmin > (4/3)ρ > 0.5ρmin
0.5ρmin ,otherwise

Use 2 D13 - 250 → As = 1061.86 mm2 > As req = 1060.4 mm2 (OK)
Z-Direction



= 1.4 x 1/2 x q x L^2 (Assume as beam due to uniform load)
= 7.10 KN.m
Mu from STAAD.Pro (Local) :

= 39 KN.m
q
a

Rn = Mu/(φ*b*d2) φ = 0.9
= 6.93 kg/cm2
0.85  f c '  2 Rn 
 1  1  = 0.0018
f y  0.85  f c ' 
0.85 f c '  600 

 max  0.75  0.85 = 0.0253
fy  600  f 
 y 

1.33ρ ,if ρmin > (4/3)ρ > 0.5ρmin
0.5ρmin ,otherwise

Use D13 - 250 → As = 530.93 mm2 > As req = 450.7 mm2 (OK)


13.2 PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT
Pedestal width bp = 2100 mm

Pedestal length dp = 500 mm
Area Ag = 1050000 mm2
Height of pedesta h = 0.865 m
Main (Longitudinal) Reinforcement

Axial load Pu = 35.8 KN (From STAAD.Pro)
Maximum moment Mu = 30.84 KN.m (From STAAD.Pro)
Reinforcement at pedestal will be calculated using interaction diagram, for combination of axial load
and bending moment. Diagram interaction for for required reinforcement is shown below.
Summary of Longitudinal Reinforcement

Dimension (mm) Area Reinforcement Percentage
No.
Width Length (mm2) n D As (mm2) %


1 2100 500 1050000 40 13 5309.2916 0.51%
Shear (Transversal) Reinforcement

Maximum shear forces Vu = Humax
= 18.10 KN (From STAAD.Pro)
Maximum axial load Nu = 35.8 KN (From STAAD.Pro)
Concrete shear capacity Φ Vc = 0.75.(1+Nu/(14.Ag).1/6.√fc.bp.dpe

(subjected to axial load) = 1474 KN
0.5*ΦVc = 737 KN
Status = 0.5*ΦVc > Vu, no need min shear reinforcement
Use minimal shear reinforcement φ10 @ 200
Status = OK! ΦVn > Vu

Attachment: Additional Break-up Strength Calculation for Foundation Type 8
This additional calculation provides 2 way shear capacity of concrete pile cap regarding to lateral
load transmitted from pipe support type 8 of PS-SPA-2031.
The general layout of pile cap and pipe supports is shown below.
Critical Section (One way shear)

Thickness B = 800 mm (Assume critical section 800, 1 side)
Height h = 200 mm (Assumed effective height in compression)
Area A = 160000 mm
Concrete strength fc' = 30 Mpa
Ultimate shear force (from structural analysis) Vu = 303 KN

One way shear strength Vnc = 0.53 x (fc')0.5 x h x d
= 435.4 KN
Reduced strength ØVnc = 0.75 x Vnc

= 326.6 KN
Check ØVnc > Vu OK
Note: Top reinforcement bar will be installed to limit crack and restraint lateral movement of pipe
inside the concrete pile cap.
Since reinforcement D16@150 is used (both direction), it can be safely concluded that the break
of concrete due to one way or two way shear can be prevented (see drawings for detail
reinforcement).

ATTACHMENT - A
ADDITIONAL BREAK-UP STRENGTH CALCULATION FOR FOUNDATION TYPE-8
...aaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI


ATTACHMENT - 1
SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULT


ATTACHMENT - 2
SUMMARY TABLE OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES


ATTACHMENT - 3
SUMMARY TABLE DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE


ATTACHMENT - 4
SUMMARY TABLE DESIGN OF BORED PILE


ATTACHMENT - 5
PIPING LOADING DATA

D 600 Ag = 282743
12 D 16 As = 2413
% = 0.85%
D 800 Ag = 502655
20 D 16 As = 4021
% = 0.80%
D 1000 Ag = 785398
32 D 16 As = 6434
% = 0.82%
CONSORTIUM OF :
CALCULATION SHEET FOR ROAD CROSSING CULVERT

RH A 14000011-OS-10101

LOCATION : MUARA LABOH, SOLOK SELATAN, SUMATERA

BARAT, INDONESIA
Consortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 1 of 19

A Issue for Review AEP

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
1. GENERAL 4
1.4 ALLOWABLE STRESS AND UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL 5
1.5 STABILITY PARAMETER 5
1.6 SOIL AND FOUNDATION PARAMETER 5
2. OUTLINE OF FOUNDATION 6
2.2 DIMENSION 7
3. LOADING 10
4. ANALYSIS OF STABILITY 13
5. CRACK WIDTH CONTROL 18
6. HORIZONTAL SHEAR CONTROL 18

7. RESUME 19

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT A PLOT PLAN
ATTACHMENT B LOADING DATA
ATTACHMENT C SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
5.1 WALL REINFORCEMENT 18
5.2 SLAB REINFORCEMENT 22
6. RESUME 30
ATTACHMENT


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
1. GENERAL
Location : MUARA LABOH, SOLOK SELATAN, SUMATERA
BARAT, INDONESIA
Structure : ROAD CROSSING CULVERT

The purpose of this calculation is to design the Road Crossing Culvert and to check/
analyse its structural integrity, strength, and stability. Since concrete is used as
material, structural design shall be in accordance with the ultimate strength method
for concrete structure as specified in ACI.

ML-PRD01-ENG-SCPC-0001
Design Specification for Civil and Structural

ACI 318
Building Code Requirement for Reinforced Concrete and ommentary
SNI-1726-2012
Procedure of Earthquake Resistant Design for Building and Non Building Structures
ASCE 7-10
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
1.3.3 Reference Documents

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
1.4 ALLOWABLE STRESS AND UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIAL

1.4.1 Concrete
Concrete compresive strength fc' = 30 MPa
Steel reinforcement yield strength fy = 400 MPa
Unit weight of asphalts γa = 22 kN/m3
1.5 STABILITY PARAMETER
Ground
Condition Overturning Sliding Buoyancy
pressure
Operating 1.2
1
Erection 1.1
Test 1.33 1.2
Not Applicable Not Applicable

Start up
Shut down
Maintenance 1.33 1.2
1.6 SOIL AND FOUNDATION PARAMETER
Allowable soil bearing capacity qa = 98 kN/m2

Coefficient of atrest soil pressure ka = 0.50
Soil density gm = 18.0 kN/m3
Saturated density of soil gsat = 8.20 kN/m3
Height of water table below GL hwt = 0.25 m

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101


2. OUTLINE OF FOUNDATION
dsl
W2
m

W1
Plan
GL
Hw tc Hs
hsl
ts
wa tw
Elevation

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
2.2 DIMENSION
Maximum culvert witdh W1 = 1.6 m

Culvert length W2 = 1 m
Culvert wall thickness tw = 0.3 m
Culvert slab thickness ts = 0.35 m
Culvert cover slab thickness tc = 0.3 m
Additional slab width wa = 0.1 m
Maximum culvert depth H = 2.5 m
Water level below ground Hw = 0.25 m
Soil cover/asphalt thickness above culvert Hs = 0.05 m

Bottom area of culvert Ap = 2.40 m2
2.3 LOADING
Vehicle load :
Case A
According to RSNI T-02-2005
Effective ditch span (W') = 1.90 m
56.25 225 kN 225 kN

kN
28.12 112.5 112.5

kN kN kN
28.12 112.5 112.5

kN kN kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
112.5 kN
1/2 W'

Case B
Actual Vehicle Load (DPA)
Based on contractor transportation study, the truck loads shown in table below :
Estimation of Over Dimension/Weight Cargo
No Equipment Name Dimensions (m) Weight (kg) Remarks

1 Turbine LP Casing Lower Front L6.5 x W5.9 x H3.8 58000 The widest
2 Turbine Rotor L8.5 x W3.5 x H3.9 77000 The longest
3 Generator Stator L6.1 x W3.9 x H4.4 95000
4 Condenser Lower Shells L6.9 x W4.8 x H4.0 25000
5 HWP Barrel Case L5.4 x W3.8 x H4.1 28000
6 Main Transformer L7.1 x W3.2 x H4.5 122500 The heaviest
Heaviest possible load of plant or equipment brought on site by the Contactor plus a 10% margin:
Main transformer = 122500 kg x 110 %
= 134750 kg
= 1321.898 kN
Estimated Multi Axle Load = 180 kN
Total load = 1501.898 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Use 12 axle trailer for shipping

Load/axle = 1501.898 kN / 12
= 125.1581 kN

1.5 m 1.5 m
P = 125.2 kN 125.2 kN 125.2 kN
Surface contact area of wheels per axle (4 points) :
Load/point = 125.2 kN / 4
= 31.3 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Concrete Cover Orientation

X local
lx = 1 m
Y local
W' = ly
Case B
For 1 m length of culvert (2 points)
62.6 kN
0.95 m 0.95 m
31.3 kN 31.3 kN
0.775 m
0.1125 m

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

Piping load :
Pe X1 = 0.75 m
Xe
X2 = 0.8 m
X3 = 0.75 m
P1 P2
P1e = 1.8 kN
P2e = 0.45 kN
P1lo = 4.4 kN
P2lo = 0.32 kN
P1lt = 4.4 kN
X1 X2 X3 P2lt = 0.32 kN
Peo = 6.97 kN
Pet = 6.97 kN
xe = 0.84 m
ex = 0.04 m
Soil pressure :
h'
Pa1 Pa2 Pa2' Pa3 Pa3'

Pa4
qw


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Pa1 = Pa2= Pa2'= Pa3= Pa3'= Pa4=

gm Hw ka gsat h' ka gsat H ka gw h' gw H Sc ka
Lateral soil pressure

Pa1 = 2.25 kN/m2
Pa2 = 0.41 kN/m2
Pa2' = 10.25 kN/m2
Pa3 = 0.98 kN/m2
Pa3' = 24.50 kN/m2
Pa4 = 2.50 kN/m2
Dead load :
Weight of wall ww = 31.02 kN
Weight of bottom slab ws = 19.74 kN
Weight of concrete cover wc = 15.51 kN
Weight of asphalt was = 2.09 kN
Weight of backfill soil wb = 1.98 kN
Ditch volume below water table vpb = 7.14 m3
Bouyancy force bw = -69.97 kN
Live load :
Surcharge load Sc = 5.0 kN/m2


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
3 ANALYSIS OF STABILITY
Check of ground pressure
a. Test condition ratio
qs max = 32.49 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.25 (OK)
qs min = 31.93 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.24 (OK)
b. Operation condition
qs max = 32.49 < 98.00 kN/m2 0.33 (OK)
qs min = 31.93 < 98.00 kN/m2 0.33 (OK)
C. Vehicle
Case A
qs max = 79.37 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.61 (OK)
qs min = 78.81 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.60 (OK)
Case B
qs max = 58.57 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.45 (OK)
qs min = 58.01 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.44 (OK)


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
4 SECTION DESIGN
Concrete cover reinforcement design
ly = 1.90 m
lx = 1 m
Dead load :
Moment shall be calculated with fixed connection.
My max = 1/8 x Pd x ly
= 4.44 kNm
Mx max = 1/8 x Pd x lx
= 2.34 kNm
Ry max = 1/2 x Pd
= 15.59 kN
Vehicle load :
Case A
My max = 1/8 x Pv x ly
= 26.72 kNm
X local
Mx max = 1/8 x Pv x lx
lx
= 14.06 kNm
Ry max = 1/2 x Pv Y local
= 56.25 kN
Case B1

My max = 14.86 kNm
Mx max = 3.12 kNm ly
Ry max = 31.29 kN
My max = 26.72 kNm

Mx max = 14.06 kNm
Ry max = 56.25 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Reinforcement Y-direction :
cover = 50 mm rebar size = 13 mm
b = 1000 mm max rebar pitch = 305 mm
h = 300 mm rebar nos = 6
d = 237 mm rebar pitch = 175 (OK)
Mu = 48.08 kNm As provided = 796.3937 mm2 (OK)
r = 0.0024
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0024 r provided = 0.0034
As req = 574.44 mm2 rebar ratio = 0.72
Reinforcement X-direction :
Mu = 25.31 kNm As provided = 1460 mm2 (OK)
r = 0.0007
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0018 r provided = 0.0033


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Wall reinforcement design
ly = 2.5 m
Y local
lx = 1 m
ly
X local
My max = 55.39 kNm
Mx max = 0.00 kNm
Ry max = 58.79 kN
Pa2'+Pa3' Pa1+Pa2+Pa3+Pa4
Rx max = 0.00 kN
lx
Reinforcement vertical-direction (Y local) :

r = 0.0051
r min = 0.0025 provide D 16 @ 175

r req = 0.0051 r provided = 0.0054
Reinforcement horizontal-direction (X local) :

r = 0.0000
r min = 0.0025 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0025 r provided = 0.0064
As req = 775 mm2 rebar ratio = 0.39

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Base slab reinforcement design

qs
ly = 1.9 m
lx = 1 m
X local
qs max = 130.67 kN/m2
lx
My end = 0.00 kNm
My middle = 58.96 kNm ly Y local
Mx = 0.00 kNm
Qy = 65.33 kN
At cantilever ly
ly = 0.10 m
lx = 1.00 m

My = 0.65 kNm
Mx = 0.00 kNm
Qy = 6.53 kN
r = 0.0033
r min = 0.0018 provide D 16 @ 175
r req = 0.0033 r provided = 0.0044

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
r = 0.0000
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0018 r provided = 0.0029
5 CRACK WIDTH CONTROL

Crack width control on wall and slab
fs = 240.00 Mpa = 34.81 ksi
dc = 58 mm = 2.28 inch
s = 9.80 inch > 7 inch (OK)
6 HORIZONTAL SHEAR CONTROL

Ditch bottom wall
Max V = 58.79 kN
Vu = 94.06 kN
f Vc = 153.51 kN (OK) Vu
ratio = 0.61
Cover slab
Vu
Max V = 71.84 kN
Vu = 108.71 kN
f Vc = 161.70 kN (OK)
ratio = 0.67

CONSORTIUM OF :

RH A 14000011-OS-10101


BARAT, INDONESIA


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
1. GENERAL 4
2.2 DIMENSION 7
3. LOADING 10

7. RESUME 19

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
ATTACHMENT


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
1. GENERAL
BARAT, INDONESIA



ACI 318
SNI-1726-2012
ASCE 7-10

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

1.4.1 Concrete
Ground
pressure
Operating 1.2
1
Erection 1.1
Test 1.33 1.2

Start up
Shut down


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101


dsl
W2
m

W1
Plan
GL
Hw tc Hs
hsl
ts
wa tw
Elevation

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
2.2 DIMENSION
Maximum culvert witdh W1 = 3 m


2.3 LOADING
Vehicle load :
Case A
56.25 225 kN 225 kN

kN
28.12 112.5 112.5

kN kN kN
28.12 112.5 112.5

kN kN kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
112.5 kN
1/2 W'

Case B

= 134750 kg
= 1321.898 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

Load/axle = 1501.898 kN / 12
= 125.1581 kN

1.5 m 1.5 m
P = 125.2 kN 125.2 kN 125.2 kN
= 31.3 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

X local
lx = 1 m
Y local
W' = ly
Case B Case C
For 1 m length of culvert (2 points) For 1 m length of culvert (4 points)
62.6 kN 62.6 kN 62.6 kN
1.85 m 1.500 m 0.925 m 1.5 m 0.925 m
31.3 kN 31.3 kN 62.6 kN 62.6 kN

0.775 m 0.775 m
0.1125 m 0.1125 m

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

Piping load :
Pe X1 = 0.75 m X3 = 0.75 m
Xe
X2 = 0.75 m X4 = 0.75 m
P1 P2 P3
P1e = 0.45 kN P1lt = 0.32 kN

P2e = 0.45 kN P2lt = 0.32 kN
P3e = 1.5 kN P3lt = 2.8 kN
P1lo = 0.32 kN
P2lo = 0.32 kN
X1 X2 X3 X4 P3lo = 2.8 kN
Peo = 5.84 kN
Pet = 5.84 kN
xe = 1.95 m
ex = 0.45 m
Soil pressure :
h'
Pa1 Pa2 Pa2' Pa3 Pa3' Pa4
qw


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Pa1 = Pa2= Pa2'= Pa3= Pa3'= Pa4=


Pa1 = 2.25 kN/m2
Pa2 = 0.62 kN/m2
Pa2' = 10.25 kN/m2
Pa3 = 1.47 kN/m2
Pa3' = 24.50 kN/m2
Pa4 = 2.50 kN/m2
Dead load :
Live load :


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
3. ANALYSIS OF STABILITY
qs max = 31.23 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.24 (OK)
qs min = 29.25 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.22 (OK)
qs max = 31.23 < 98.00 kN/m2 0.32 (OK)
qs min = 29.25 < 98.00 kN/m2 0.30 (OK)
C. Vehicle
Case A
qs max = 59.36 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.45 (OK)
qs min = 57.37 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.44 (OK)
Case B
qs max = 46.88 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.36 (OK)
qs min = 44.89 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.34 (OK)
Case C
qs max = 62.52 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.48 (OK)
qs min = 60.54 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.46 (OK)


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
4. SECTION DESIGN
ly = 3.35 m
lx = 1 m
Dead load :
= 14.75 kNm
= 4.40 kNm
Ry max = 1/2 x Pd
= 52.48 kN
Vehicle load :
Case A
= 47.11 kNm
X local
lx
= 14.06 kNm
= 56.25 kN
Case B

My max = 28.63 kNm
Ry max = 31.29 kN
Case C
My max = 41.90 kNm My max = 47.11 kNm
Mx max = 6.25 kNm Mx max = 6.25 kNm
Ry max = 62.58 kN Ry max = 62.58 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
r = 0.0032
r min = 0.0018 provide D 16 @ 175
r req = 0.0032 r provided = 0.0042
r = 0.0002
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0018 r provided = 0.0028


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
ly = 2.5 m
Y local
lx = 1 m
ly
X local
My max = 57.56 kNm
Mx max = 0.00 kNm
Ry max = 60.53 kN
Rx max = 0.00 kN
lx

r = 0.0035
r min = 0.0025 provide D 16 @ 175

r req = 0.0035 r provided = 0.0044

r = 0.0000
r min = 0.0025 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0025 r provided = 0.0053

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

qs
ly = 3.35 m
lx = 1 m
X local
qs max = 130.67 kN/m2
lx
My end = 0.00 kNm
Mx = 0.00 kNm
Qy = 65.33 kN
At cantilever ly
ly = 0.15 m
lx = 1.00 m

My = 1.47 kNm
Mx = 0.00 kNm
Qy = 9.80 kN
r = 0.0041
r min = 0.0018 provide D 19 @ 175
r req = 0.0041 r provided = 0.0046

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
r = 0.0000
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 175
r req = 0.0018 r provided = 0.0022

fs = 240.00 Mpa = 34.81 ksi
dc = 60 mm = 2.34 inch

Ditch bottom wall
Max V = 60.53 kN
Vu = 96.84 kN
f Vc = 187.62 kN (OK) Vu
ratio = 0.52
Cover slab
Vu
Max V = 115.06 kN
Vu = 163.10 kN
f Vc = 195.81 kN (OK)
ratio = 0.83

CONSORTIUM OF :

RH A 14000011-OS-10101


BARAT, INDONESIA


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
1. GENERAL 4
2.2 DIMENSION 7
3. LOADING 10

7. RESUME 19

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
ATTACHMENT


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
1. GENERAL
BARAT, INDONESIA



ACI 318
SNI-1726-2012
ASCE 7-10

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

1.4.1 Concrete
Ground
pressure
Operating 1.2
1
Erection 1.1
Test 1.33 1.2

Start up
Shut down


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101


dsl
W2
m

W1
Plan
GL
Hw tc Hs
hsl
ts
wa tw
Elevation

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
2.2 DIMENSION
Maximum culvert witdh W1 = 3.3 m


2.3 LOADING
Vehicle load :
Case A
56.25 225 kN 225 kN

kN
28.12 112.5 112.5

kN kN kN
28.12 112.5 112.5

kN kN kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
112.5 kN
1/2 W'

Case B

= 134750 kg
= 1321.898 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

Load/axle = 1501.898 kN / 12
= 125.1581 kN

1.5 m 1.5 m
P = 125.2 kN 125.2 kN 125.2 kN
= 31.3 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

X local
lx = 1 m
Y local
W' = ly
Case B Case C
For 1 m length of culvert (4 points) For 1 m length of culvert (6 points)
62.6 kN 62.6 kN 62.6 kN 62.6 kN 62.6 kN
0.70 m 1.5 1.5 m 0.350 m 1.5 m 0.350 m
62.6 kN 62.6 kN 93.9 kN 93.9 kN

0.775 m 0.775 m
0.1125 m 0.1125 m

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

Piping load :
Pe X1 = 0.6 m X3 = 0.775 m
Xe
X2 = 1.025 m X4 = 0.5 m
P1 P2 P3 P4
P1e = 1.45 kN P1lt = 2.8 kN

P2e = 1.8 kN P2lt = 4.4 kN
P3e = 0.45 kN P3lt = 0.32 kN
P4e = 0.45 kN P4lt = 0.32 kN
P1lo = 2.8 kN
X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 P2lo = 4.4 kN
P3lo = 0.32 kN
P4lo = 0.32 kN
Peo = 11.22 kN
Pet = 11.22 kN
xe = 1.49 m
ex = 0.16 m
Soil pressure :
h'
Pa1 Pa2 Pa2' Pa3 Pa3' Pa4
qw


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
Pa1 = Pa2= Pa2'= Pa3= Pa3'= Pa4=


Pa1 = 2.25 kN/m2
Pa2 = 1.03 kN/m2
Pa2' = 10.25 kN/m2
Pa3 = 2.45 kN/m2
Pa3' = 24.50 kN/m2
Pa4 = 2.50 kN/m2
Dead load :
Live load :


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
3 ANALYSIS OF STABILITY
qs max = 34.06 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.26 (OK)
qs min = 32.94 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.25 (OK)
qs max = 34.06 < 98.00 kN/m2 0.35 (OK)
qs min = 32.94 < 98.00 kN/m2 0.34 (OK)
C. Vehicle
Case A
qs max = 59.63 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.46 (OK)
qs min = 58.51 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.45 (OK)
Case B
qs max = 62.51 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.48 (OK)
qs min = 61.39 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.47 (OK)
Case C
qs max = 76.73 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.59 (OK)
qs min = 75.61 < 130.67 kN/m2 0.58 (OK)


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
4 SECTION DESIGN
ly = 3.70 m
lx = 1 m
Dead load :
= 22.44 kNm
= 6.07 kNm
Ry max = 1/2 x Pd
= 81.88 kN
Vehicle load :
Case A
= 52.03 kNm
X local
lx
= 14.06 kNm
= 56.25 kN
Case B

My max = 51.43 kNm
Ry max = 62.58 kN
Case C
My max = 48.77 kNm My max = 52.03 kNm
Mx max = 9.37 kNm Mx max = 9.37 kNm
Ry max = 93.87 kN Ry max = 93.87 kN

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
r = 0.0021
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 125
r req = 0.0021 r provided = 0.0026
r = 0.0001
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 125
r req = 0.0018 r provided = 0.0028


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
ly = 2.5 m
Y local
lx = 1 m
ly
X local
My max = 61.90 kNm
Mx max = 0.00 kNm
Ry max = 64.00 kN
Rx max = 0.00 kN
lx

r = 0.0027
r min = 0.0025 provide D 13 @ 125

r req = 0.0027 r provided = 0.0031

r = 0.0000
r min = 0.0025 provide D 13 @ 125
r req = 0.0025 r provided = 0.0061

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101

qs
ly = 3.70 m
lx = 1 m
X local
qs max = 130.67 kN/m2
lx
My end = 0.00 kNm
Mx = 0.00 kNm
Qy = 65.33 kN
At cantilever ly
ly = 0.15 m
lx = 1.00 m

My = 1.47 kNm
Mx = 0.00 kNm
Qy = 9.80 kN
r = 0.0053
r min = 0.0018 provide D 19 @ 125
r req = 0.0053 r provided = 0.0061

0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
r = 0.0000
r min = 0.0018 provide D 13 @ 125
r req = 0.0018 r provided = 0.0029

fs = 240.00 Mpa = 34.81 ksi
dc = 60 mm = 2.34 inch

Ditch bottom wall
Max V = 64.00 kN
Vu = 102.40 kN
f Vc = 221.74 kN (OK) Vu
ratio = 0.46
Cover slab
Vu
Max V = 175.74 kN
Vu = 248.44 kN
f Vc = 264.04 kN (OK)
ratio = 0.94


0 RH A 14000011-OS-10101
7 RESUME
W1 tw ts tc wa H
Location Sum
m m m m m m
Welpad ML-A to ML-F 1 1.60 0.30 0.35 0.30 0.10 2.50
In front of Wellpad E 1 2.60 0.35 0.40 0.35 0.15 2.30
Wellpad ML-A to ML-H type 1 2 3.00 0.35 0.45 0.35 0.15 2.50
Welpad ML-A to MLH type 2 1 3.30 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.15 2.50
Reinforcement
Location Cover Wall Slab
Y-dir X-dir Y-dir X-dir Y-dir X-dir
Welpad ML-A to ML-F 13 175 13 175 16 175 13 175 16 175 12.7 175
In front of Wellpad E 15.9 200 12.7 200 16 200 13 200 19.1 200 12.7 200
Wellpad ML-A to ML-H type 1 16 175 13 175 16 175 13 175 19.1 175 12.7 175
Welpad ML-A to MLH type 2 12.7 125 13 125 12.7 125 13 125 19.1 125 12.7 125

Reinforcement
W1 tw ts tc wa H
Location Sum Cover Wall Slab
m m m m m m Y-dir X-dir Y-dir X-dir Y-dir X-dir
Welpad ML-A to ML-F 1 1.6 0.3 0.35 0.3 0.1 2.5 13 175 13 175 16 175 13 175 16 175 13 175
In front of Wellpad E 1 Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509Err:509
Wellpad ML-A to ML-H type 1 2 3 0.35 0.45 0.35 0.15 2.5 16 175 13 175 16 175 13 175 19 175 13 175
Welpad ML-A to MLH type 2 1 3.3 0.4 0.45 0.45 0.15 2.5 13 125 13 125 13 125 13 125 19 125 13 125

ML-PRD01-EnG-CCAL-0113 - Rev 3 - Calculation Sheet For Pipe Support Wellpad ML-A

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ML-PRD01-EnG-CCAL-0113 - Rev 3 - Calculation Sheet For Pipe Support Wellpad ML-A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONSORTIUM OF :

CALCULATION SHEET FOR PIPE SUPPORT WELLPAD ML-A

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

PROJECT : MUARA LABOH GEOTHERMAL POWER PROJECT

OWNER : PT. SUPREME ENERGY MUARA LABOH (SEML)

LOCATION : MUARA LABUH, SOLOK SELATAN, SUMATERA

...Consortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 1 of 26...

...Consortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 2 of 26...

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

PART I FILLED COMPOSITE STRUCTURE 6

4. ANALYSIS OF FILLED COMPOSITE HSS 10

PART II STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURE 21

...aaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 2 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

7.2 PIPING LOAD 22

PART III STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR PS-SPA-2011 28

PART IV FOUNDATION SUPPORT FOR PS-SPA-1025 ~ PS-SPA-1030 and PS-SPA-1040 ~ PS-SPA-1042

11. DESIGN LOAD 32

12. ANALYSIS RESULT 33

13. REINFORCEMENT DESIGN 35

...aaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 3 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

ATTACHMENT - 3 SUMMARY TABLE DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE

...aaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 4 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

1.2 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

1.3 APPLICABLE SPECIFICATION, CODES, AND STANDARDS

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 4 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

1.5 SOIL PROPERTIES

1.6 UNIT OF MEASUREMENT

1.7 COMPUTER SOFTWARE

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 5 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

PART I FILLED COMPOSITE STRUCTURE

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 6 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

fx : axial force, along the direction of flow on the pipe

Sources of external load from piping is generated from:

3.3 WIND LOAD

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 7 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

3.4 EARTHQUAKE LOAD

The structure will be designed as cantilever or inverted pendulum (1 leg support).

The coefficient of seismic acceleration for pipe support shall be:

3.5 LOAD COMBINATION

No. Load Combination

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 8 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

No. Load Combination

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 9 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

4 ANALYSIS OF FILLED COMPOSITE HSS

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 10 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

λ = Steel pipe section compactness

...aaaConsortium of Sumitomo Corporation and PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI 11 of 38

Document No : Origin Rev No Contract No :

KL/r = 67.0 < 200

4.3 AXIAL AND FLEXURAL CAPACITY

Where As = Area of steel pipe

Reduced axial capacity: Ø Pn