Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caterpillar Vs JCB PDF
Caterpillar Vs JCB PDF
Feature Comparison
November 2005
Caterpillar ®
428E
Backhoe Loader
vs
JCB 3CX
Backhoe Loader
This document supplements information in the Specalog. Marketing content will be available
only on secured dealer extranets and by accessing the PDF in the Sales Library on FlashNet.
Summary
Chassis 3-8
■ Side Rails
■ Stabilizers
■ Hydraulic Tank
■ Electrical System
■ Hydraulic System
■ Front Axle
Loader 13 - 15
■ Durability
■ Visibility
Backhoe 16 - 19
■ Excavator Style Boom
■ Extendible Stick
■ Bucket Linkage
■ Visibility
Operator Environment 20 - 23
■ Operator Station
■ Personal Storage
■ Security
Serviceability 24 - 29
■ Daily Checks
■ Engine Bay
■ Hydraulic Filter
■ Cylinders
■ Stabiliser Wearpads
Performance Comparison 30
Brief Specifications 31
Advantage: Slide-Rails
The backhoe on the 428E side-shifts on a flat rail without the need
for running channels.
Conclusions:
The channels which the 3CX slide frame travels in are prone to
significant dirt ingress during trench work. This can result in
difficulty when trying to side-shift the machine, with the operator
having to constantly clean the running channels. The Caterpillar
machine side-shifts without the need for such runners and is
therefore free of these problems.
428E
3CX
3CX
Stabilisers Advantage:
The 428E is designed with large stabilizer feet which can be
fitted with bolt-on reversible two piece street pads to prevent
damage to asphalt surfaces. The stabiliser system also includes
built-in lock valves as standard.
Conclusions:
The larger stabiliser feet on the 428E provide lower ground
pressure and more machine support. This is beneficial when
428E working on soft ground, where the JCB foot will be more likely
to sink in.
The street pads protect road surfaces from damage when the
stabilisers are deployed. Being two-piece and reversible, the
pads can also be easily replaced or reversed to prolong their life
span. The optional pads on the 3CX are manufactured from an
softer compound that wears down more easily. They are also
non-reversible and require more frequent and costly
replacements.
Conclusions:
The Caterpillar operator benefits from the reassurance that he has
storage space all of his tools, chains, pins etc. A 3CX owner may
have to leave some of those tools at home, or longer tools, such as
a Backhoe Quick Coupler Release Bar, rolling around on the cab
floor.
Stowage space on the JCB is limited by the close proximity of the 428E
hydraulic tank, which also limits how wide the lid can be opened,
restricting access to an already small toolbox.
428E
3CX
3CX 3CX
Feature Comparison – Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe Loader 5
Chassis
Conclusions:
The Caterpillar design has the hydraulic tank out of harms way.
It also provides a positive head of oil for the hydraulic pump.
The tank on the JCB is more vulnerable. The sight gauge is
exposed and could be damage by the operator when getting in
and out of the cab, or by debris trapped between the sight gauge
and the tool box lid.. The lines into the tank are exposed
underneath and could be damaged on site. Also, the steps in the
hydraulic and fuel tanks are rigidly mounted and could damage
the tanks, if impacted on the jobsite. By contrast, the E-series
steps are designed to bend and not damage the tanks,
if impacted on site.
3CX
428E
Conclusions:
Harnesses on the JCB are either protected by plastic ribbed
conduit or not at all. This design is not as durable as the braided
harnesses on the 428E and does not offer the same level of
protection against damage on the jobsite.
JCB harnesses use the same colour wire for all circuits. 3CX
The circuit number is printed in the wire. This makes electrical
troubleshooting more difficult.
The JCB has two alternator options: a 75 amp alternator is fitted as
standard and an optional 85 map alternator is available when a
Turbocharged engine is fitted. This larger alternator is still smaller
than the 120 amp fitted to the 428E and may not provide sufficient
charging when working in winter with all the lights and heater etc.
turned on.
428E
Conclusions:
The boom lock system on the 428E be engaged and
dis-engaged at any swing angle.
3CX
3CX
3CX
Advantage: Engine
The 428E is available with a choice of engine: a 67 kW (Net)
engine is fitted as standard, while a 73 kW (Net) engine is
available as an option.
Conclusions:
The choice of engine option on the 428E allows the customer to
specify the machine to more exacting requirements. The 3CX also
has two engine options. The first is a Naturally Aspirated 59.8 kW
(Net), while a 64.5 kW (Net) Turbocharged engine is available as
an option.
Conclusions:
The Caterpillar system reacts to the demand that is required
by the implements, adjusting the flow and pressure provided
accordingly. This leads to full hydraulic power at any given
engine speed, allowing delicate operations where precise
modulation yet powerful forces are required. The flow sharing
valves ensure that all services receive the oil they require and
results in very smooth modulation of multiple functions,
without any one function “stalling out”.
Conclusions:
The offset and angled position of the 3CX front driveshaft can lead
to excessive vibration and limited driveshaft component life.
Mounting the differential centrally removes this risk. The JCB
front driveshaft is also unprotected, compared to the 428E which
benefits from an optional, durable transmission guard.
The front axle on the 428E is also sealed and lubricated for life,
unlike the axle on the JCB.
428E
3CX
428E
Conclusions:
The JCB is also available with 20” front tyres. However, these
tyres restrict the turning circle of the machine, leading to
reduced manoeuvrability. The turning circle is reduced by as
much as 30%. On the 428E, there is no loss of turning circle
with 20” front tyres, allowing the operator to retain maximum
manoeuvrability.
428E 3CX
Advantage:
The 428E is fitted with a Parallel Lift Loader as standard.
Lift Arms & Bucket
Maximum bucket capacity is 1.03 m3.
Conclusions:
The 3CX has a parallel lift loader, which offers the same 12.4
performance benefits as on the 428E. However, the 428E
design is more productive, with larger pins and cylinders, mm
providing increased performance and durability.
The JCB bucket design uses thinner plates for the side plates
than the Caterpillar design. Thicker side plates result in greater
wear resistance, providing a much more durable bucket with
longer service life.
428E
10.4
mm
3CX
50.75
428E mm
39.87
3CX mm
Feature Comparison – Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe Loader 13
Loader
Durability Advantage:
The Caterpillar bucket features thicker bucket mounting plates,
and XT3 hoses rather than the JCB’s metallic tubes used for the
MP bucket cylinder lines.
Conclusions:
Thicker plates contribute to a greater resistance to bending when
loading the bucket or lifting uneven weights. This contributes to
a more robust, hard wearing bucket.
428E
428E
3CX
428E 3CX
Advantage: Visibility
The 428E offers the operator good visibility to the loader
bucket. Four adjustable front work lights are available.
Conclusions:
The narrow hood on the 428E is clear of obstructions. This,
along with the divergent lift arms, a large area front windscreen
and a narrow front console, results in a clear line of sight to the
bucket for the operator.
3CX
428E
3CX
Conclusions:
The excavator-style boom allows additional clearance when
reaching over obstacles and the ability to dig closer to the
machine. The 3CX boom has a very deep and straight profile.
This makes it more difficult to dig over obstacles than with the
428E. This also makes excavating and dumping close to the truck
very difficult, as is common on road works.
428E
3CX
Conclusions:
The outer sliding extension keeps the wear pads and running
surfaces clean and away from the material being excavated.
On the JCB, any material being clamped in the bucket is
clamped against the sliding rails of the extension. This can
result in damage to the running surfaces and material being
dragging back into the wearpads. Both conditions will result in
an increased wear rate on the pads and reduced service life.
428E
The serrations on the 428E E-stick also allows the operator to
clamp material without the risk of damage to the stick or the
need for a thumb.
3CX
Conclusions:
The high rotation linkage on the 428E allows easy bucket
clamping, longer flat bottom trenches, and deeper vertical trench
end walls. This is not achievable on the 3CX, which only has
201° of rotation. This results in less machine repositioning with
the 428E and no need to adjust the linkage for ‘speed’ or ‘power’
when moving from job to job.
428E 3CX
Advantage: Visibility
The 428E boasts superior visibility to the backhoe bucket
through large, fully opening windows. Four adjustable rear
worklights are available for working at night.
Conclusions: 428E
The 428E boom is of a narrow fabricated design which is
255mm wide. By comparison, the boom on the 3CX is 412 mm
in width. This narrow design ensures great visibility to the
bucket throughout the operating range.
On the 428E, two of the rear worklights are positioned on the 3CX
side of the cab. This allows the operator to see clearly thought
the full swing range, when working at night. The lights on the
3CX do not have as much side adjustment, restricting the
operators visibility in the dark.
428E
3CX 428E
3CX
428E 3CX
Conclusions:
The Caterpillar machine offers the operator a considerably more
spacious cab than the JCB. The cab on the 3CX can give the
operator a feeling of being squeezed in.
3CX
Conclusions:
The 428E cab offers the operator lockable compartments, as well
as a flask holder and a number of areas for storing loose items.
The 3CX only offers a single compartment, which cannot be
locked and a flask holder that cannot be used when stowing a
beacon in the cab.
428E 428E
3CX 3CX
Conclusions:
The control layout in the Caterpillar cab results in a machine that
is easy to drive. The gauges on the RH panel cover vital machine
systems and provide more information on machine health than on
the JCB. All the switches on the RH panel are logically placed
and well spaced. Compare this to the JCB RH console: the
switches are all squeezed together, are not in a logical order and
the panel does not have any spare switch locations for customer
and dealer options
The backhoe controls have been located such that the operator
can easily set-up for backhoe work. On the JCB, the operator
must reach over the back of the seat to operate the stabilisers.
This is made more difficult by the headrest on the seat. The boom
lock control on the JCB is also awkward to operate and usually
quite stiff.
3CX
Advantage: Security
The 428E has an optional built-in vandal guard and optional
Machine Security System (MSS). The MSS system is
compliant to UK PTAG requirements and can provide a
reduction in insurance premiums.
Conclusions:
The vandal guard in the 428E cab is incorporated into the
design of the console. On the JCB, there is a separate cover,
rendering it an easier task for the vandal to remove. It must
also be completely removed by the operator and stowed in the
cab by the operators feet when not in use.
Both the 428E and the 3CX are available with MSS. However, 428E
the system on the 428E can be operated without removing the
key: there is a separate key fob to deactivate the system. On the
JCB, the deactivation chip is part if the key, meaning the
operator must remove the key every time the machine needs to
be started. At best, this is an annoyance. At worst, this will lead
to premature failure of the ignition switch.
428E
3CX
3CX 3CX
Conclusions:
The fully opening hood on the 428E provides excellent access to
the engine bay. All fluid check and fill points are easily accessible
and colour coded, to help the operator identify the correct system.
3CX
3CX 428E
3CX
Conclusions:
The 428E operator can be assured that Caterpillar have safety in
mind. The engine bay on the JCB appears cluttered and has an
unguarded fan which poses a significant safety risk. The air pre-
cleaner on the JCB also blows dust into the engine bay, whereas
the Caterpillar system has Automatic Dust Ejection and channels
it out through the exhaust.
On the 428E, the fuel and water separator filters have been
combined. This has lead to a 40% reduction in filter costs, as there 428E
is now only one filter to replace. On the JCB, there are two filters
and the water separator does not drain directly onto the floor,
which can contribute to a dirty engine bay.
3CX
Conclusions:
The front axle and driveshaft on the Caterpillar BHL are
maintenance free. The cuts down on the time the operator needs
to spend on daily greasing.
The 3CX front axle requires regular greasing; at the main pivot
pin, the driveshaft, the axle universal joints and the axle king pins.
This means the operator must crawl under the machine regularly,
428E all year round, to perform this maintenance. A dirty job, wherever
the machine is located.
428E
3CX
3CX
26 Feature Comparison – Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe Loader
Serviceability
Conclusions:
Changing the hydraulic filter on the 428E is a simple and clean
process.
3CX
428E
Cylinders Advantage:
The 428E hydraulic system uses Caterpillar XT3 hoses and steel
tubes, which are completely serviceable. All connections use o-
ring face seals.
Conclusions:
The cylinders on the JCB use welded tubes. These are difficult to
replace, should they become damaged. Some of the tubes are in
vulnerable positions, such as on the the bucket cylinder. If
damaged, the old tube must be cut off and a new tube welded on
in it’s place. Compare this to the 428E, where the tubes can be
easily replaced, with minimal tools.
428E
3CX 3CX
Conclusions:
The adjustment system on the 428E used a standard bolt and
locknut. Free play can be adjusted out in minutes, providing a
stable machine for backhoe operations.
The JCB system uses screw in plastic pucks. These can work
loose, swell and seize up or strip on the thread if not adjusted
regularly. They are also adjusted using non-standard size tools.
Mounted on the outside of the leg, the adjusting pads can
become damaged on site. By contrast, the adjustment on the 428E
428E leg is on the opposite side and therefore better protected.
3CX
The 428E has 7.5% more stick breakout force than the 3CX.
The 3CX can dig a 610mm wide flat bottom trench (to SAE
standards) 38mm deeper than the 428E.
Loader Performance
The 428E has 12% higher loader breakout force than the 3CX.
The 428E has 7% higher loader lift capacity than the 3CX.
General
Net Power Std:67kW, Opt 73kW NA:59.8, Turbo:64.5 kW
Hydraulics
Pump Type Axial piston Twin gear pump
Max Flow 125 l/min Main Pump: NA:73 l/min,
Turbo: 79 l/min
Second Pump: NA: 51 l/min,
Turbo: 57 l/min
System Pressure 227 bar 227 bar
Backhoe
Breakout (Bucket) 51.1kN 48.4 kN (Speed)
55.9 kN (Power)
Breakout (Stick) 31.8kN (Ret) 29.5 kN (Ret)
Max Dig Depth (SAE 2ft) 4172mm (Ret) 4210 mm (Ret)
The information contained herein is intended for circulation only to Caterpillar and dealer employees whose duties require knowledge of such
reports and is intended exclusively for their information and training. It may contain unverified analysis and facts observed by various Caterpillar
or dealer employees. However, effort has been made to provide reliable results regarding any information comparing Caterpillar built and
competitive machines. Effort has been made to use the latest available spec sheet and other material in the full understanding that these are
subject to change without notice. Any reproduction of this release without the foregoing explanation is prohibited.
HEKB3334 (11/2005)
www.CAT.com
© 2005 Caterpillar
®
All rights reserved