S.

No Registeration Name RollNumber

Number

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
COMMUNICATION (5 Marks) CONTENT (5 Marks)

(5 marks) High Fluency, Speech (5 marks) High Quality, Every majorpoint was
flowed well. Transitions were well supported with several relevant facts,
used. statistics and or examples.

(4 marks) Good Degree of (4 marks) Good Quality, Every major point was
Fluency, Speech was supported with facts, statistics and or
organized. examples, but the relevanceof some was
questionable.
(3 marks) Moderate Degree of
Fluency, Speech was (3 marks) Moderate Quality, Some points were
somewhat organized. supported with facts and statistics of
questionable relevance.
(2 marks) Low Degree of
Fluency, Speech appeared to (2 marks) Low Quality, Lack of support or
have little organization examples was provided.
(1 mark) Poor Quality, Points were not
(1 mark) No Fluency, Speech supported.
appeared to have no
organization
CONFIDENCE (5 Marks)

(5 marks) Highly Confident, Speaker consistently used gestures, eye

contact, tone of voice and a levelof enthusiasm in a way thatkept the
attention of the audience.

(4 marks) Good level of Confidence, Speaker usually used gestures,

eye contact,tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept
the attention of the audience.

(3 marks) Moderate degree of Confidence, Speaker sometimes used

gestures, eye contact, tone of voiceanda level of enthusiasm inaway Marks (15)
that kept the attention of the audience.

(2 marks) Low Confidence, Speaker used few gestures, and made

little eye contactwith the audience.

(1 mark) Not confident, Speaker rarely made eye contact withthe

audience; Presentability did not keep the attention of the Interviewer
Remarks
Q