Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MASTERS OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
MICROELECTRONICS
Submitted by
Jasleen kaur
Registration number:15-UIT-631
Director, UIET
Ms Harvinder Kaur
2015-2017
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the work which is being submitted in this thesis titled “Performance
Comparison of MEMS based Polysilicon and GaAs Thermal Actuator”, in partial fulfillment of
the requirement for the award of degree of “Master of Technology in Microelectronics”
submitted in UIET, Panjab University, Chandigarh, is an authentic record of my own work
carried out under the supervision of “Prof Renu Vig” and “Ms. Harvinder Kaur” The matter
presented in this thesis has not been submitted for the award of any other degree of this or any
other university.
Supervisor Co-ordinator
Co-Supervisor Chandigarh
Ms Harvinder Kaur
I have not submitted the matter in this thesis report for award of any other degree.
Place: M.Tech(Microelectronics)
Roll no-15607
UIET,PU,Chandigarh
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to my guide Prof. Renu Vig( Director) and my
co-guide, Ms Harvinder kaur (Assistant Professor) for their patient guidance and support
throughout my work. Without their passionate participation and input, the validation survey could
not have been successfully conducted. I am truly very fortunate to have the opportunity to work
with them. I found their guidance to be extremely valuable. I am also thankful to the Coordinator
of Electronics and Communication Engineering Department, entire faculty and staff of
Electronics and Communication Engineering Department. I would also like to thank my friends
who devoted their valuable time and helped me in all possible ways towards successful
completion of this work. I thank all those who have contributed directly or indirectly to this
work. Lastly, I would like to thank my parents for their unconditional support and
encouragement.
Jasleen Kaur
ABSTRACT
MEMS is a technology of miniaturizing devices to the microscopic level. Power conservation
and minimum area is the most premium advantage of these devices. Sensors and actuators are
most prominent devices in this field. They can be fabricated using most of the surface
micromachining processes and can be operated in integrated circuit (IC) device voltages and
power rating. Silicon (Si) based Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are now well
understood and widely used in various integrated micromachined microsensors and
microactuators, In addition to this, gallium arsenide (GaAs) offers a number of material-related
properties and technological advantages over Si . These include well known properties, such as
direct band gap transition and high electron mobility but GaAs also offers some disadvantages
due to which is it not so suitable for thermal actuator. This can be shown with the help of FEM
simulation.Heat transfer through and around these microstructures are very complex. In this
paper we present an analysis of this microstructures and perform its FEM analysis using Comsol
Multiphysics 4.2. We have a model which is used to compare the behaviour of thermal
microactuator made up from polysilicon and Gallium Arsenide. By varying the voltage and
geomatrical dimension ,we get a clear understanding of the performance of the structure.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Certificate…………………………………………………………………………………………
Declaration……………………………………………………………………………………......
Acknowledgement………..............................................................................................................
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………..
List of figures…………………………………………………………………………………….
List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………..
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1MEMS…………………………………………………………………………………………2
1.2MEMS Actuators……………………………………………………………………………...5
2.2.3 LIGA………………………………………………………………………………12
4.2.1 Displacement………………………………………………………………………….31
REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………48
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig 1.1: The schematic view of MEMS chip…………………………………………………..4
Fig 1.6 The thermal bimetallic micro actuator with the cantilever prototype………………... 7
Fig 2.7 Top & Bottom view: left side of a chevron micro-actuator…………………………...17
Fig 4.2 A simple tension test and a real life loading condition………………………………33
Fig 5.13 Simulation profiles of polysilicon power dissipation density of actuator at200[um].40
Fig 5.14 Simulation profiles of polysilicon power dissipation density of actuator at 250[um].40
Fig 5.15Simulation profiles of polysilicon power dissipation density of actuator at 300[um].40
Fig 5.17 Simulation profiles of GaAs power dissipation density of actuator at 300[um]…….41
Fig 5.18 Simulation profiles of Polysilicon Von mises stress of actuator at 200[um]………..41
Fig 5.19 Simulation profiles of Polysilicon Von mises stress of actuator at 250[um]………..41
Fig 5.20 Simulation profiles of Polysilicon Von mises stress of actuator at 300[um]………..42
Fig 5.21 Simulation profiles of GaAs Von mises stress of actuator at 200[um]……………...42
Fig 5.22 Simulation profiles of GaAs Von mises stress of actuator at 250[um]……………...42
Table2. Polysilicon………………………………………………………………………....20
Table 3.Gold…………………………………………………………………………….....20
Table 4.Nickel……………………………………………………………………………...20
Table 5.GaAs………………………………………………………………………………21