Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. Tracking control for inverters are commonly used in load flow con-
trol, adjustable speed motor and smart grid. In this paper the model predict con-
trol (MPC) technique is introduced and then used in the current control of single
phase full-bridge inverters. To conquer the inherent time delay of MPC, an
improvement is made. Finally, with several simulation results, the method
proves to enjoy the characteristics of quick response, small overshoot and high
accuracy.
1 Introduction
Inverters are playing an increasingly important role in areas such as Direct Current
Transmission, Uninterruptible Power Supply and distributed generation [1]. The evo-
lution of switching devices has greatly promoted the research of the inverter control
technology. On the other hand, the rapid development of computer technology has
enabled the implementation of more complex control strategies. Some of these strate-
gies are Immune Genetic Algorithm [2], BP neural network algorithm and predictive
control [3]. The latter is gradually becoming popular for it’s simplicity in implementa-
tion. Paper [4] introduced the principles, classification, development and applications
of Predictive Control and Paper [5] introduced an application of Predictive Control in
power system.
A main branch of predictive control is Model Predictive Control (MPC) [6].
In MPC, a model of the system is established. Based on the model, the future value
of the variables can be predicted. According to the comparison of the predicted
value and the desired reference value, the control action at the present time is
determined.
MPC can be conveniently applied to the control of single phase inverters for the
structure of which is very simple for modeling. The switching patterns of the inverter
are finite so the prediction can be made based only on the possible switching patterns
[7]. And this makes the calculation of predicting can be completed during a very brief
time.
M. Ma (Ed.): Communication Systems and Information Technology, LNEE 100, pp. 419–425.
springerlink.com © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
420 Y. Lv, N. Xie, and K. Wang
y(k)=Cx(k) (2)
The optimality criterion and cost function are also decided in terms of the
controlled object.
input1
input2
C
C
g
m
E
i
i RL
E +
-
RL
C
C
g
VD3 VD4
m
m
E