Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229046072
CITATIONS READS
0 20
3 authors:
Albrecht Schmidt
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (L…
572 PUBLICATIONS 12,164 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
CIMPLEX | Bringing CItizens, Models and Data together in Participatory, Interactive SociaL
EXploratories View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Tanja Döring on 06 June 2014.
Tanja Döring
University of Duisburg-Essen
Schützenbahn 70, 45117 Essen
tanja.doering@uni-due.de
Albrecht Schmidt
University of Duisburg-Essen
Schützenbahn 70, 45117 Essen
albrecht.schmidt@acm.org
ABSTRACT
Mobile learning has become a core topic in developed countries, where mobile platforms compete with a well-established
infrastructure of PCs. In contrast, the mobile phone is the first computing platform for most users in developing countries.
In this paper, we will analyze the state in Latin America with regard to the access to information technology for learning.
Our initial study focuses on Panama, because it is a good representative of Latin American countries in terms of
availability of technology in schools, as well as educational challenges. Despite the lack of technology found in schools,
an increasing number of people have mobile phones. This paper explores the potential for using mobile phones as
learning tools and looks especially at how current teaching and learning practices can be supported, e.g. to solve math or
language exercises. Besides, we look at the network and multimedia capabilities of mobile phones and assess how these
could be used to support learning and, in particular, documentation and information gathering.
KEYWORDS
Learning, mobile learning, mobile phones, developing countries, children
1. INTRODUCTION
Mobile phones are the most popular mobile computing platforms; in the last year alone, one out of every two
people around the world used a mobile phone [ITU 2007]. Indeed, in just five years, from 2002 to 2007,
worldwide mobile phone users grew 23.6% in average. In developing regions, like Africa and Latin America,
this growth rate was around 49% and 40% respectively.
There are two central motivations for us to work on this topic: (1) It is expected that over the next years a
great majority of people will have a general computing platform in the form of a mobile phone, and (2)
Children spend a significant time in public transport traveling to and from school. For many citizens in the
developing world, mobile phones represent their first contact with computing technology. At the moment,
even many low-end phones offer a means to run software (e.g. JAVA ME programs). Also, transportation
within the cities and urban areas is often chaotic and time-consuming. A majority of children spend two
hours or more each day traveling by bus to and from school. This suggests that mobile phones would have a
significant advantage over PCs or laptops in this usage context, even given the smaller user interface.
In this paper, we therefore analyze the potential for mobile learning in developing countries. Our work
focuses on the educational situation in Panama, since it is representative for Latin-America, as we explain in
the next section. In the next two sections, we look at technological and educational states of Panama and
contrast them to several approaches for improving the access to technology in developing countries. In the
fourth section, we explore the potential of mobile phones for support education in developing countries by
discussing specific scenarios. Finally, we explain why and how mobile phones can support current learning
practices.
2. ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY
Panama is situated in Central America, and had a population of 3,339,781 inhabitants in 2007; almost half of
them were less than 24 years old [Contraloria 2008]. Like many other Latin American countries, Panama also
had a high concentration of inhabitants near metropolitan areas: 70% of the population lived in the province
of Panama [Contraloria 2008]. Primary school attendance in Panama is mandatory and free. As a result,
almost all children (99%) between 6 and 12 years old in Panama go to school, but after children reach 12
years old, their school attendance decreases greatly, especially in rural areas [MEDUCA 2008].
Even though computers became widely available in Panama in the mid-1990’s, a recent study from
March 2008 shows that less than a quarter of families (21%) have a computer at home [Contraloria 2008].
Another study shows that only 16% of Panamanians are Internet users [ANSEP 2008]. This indicates that of
the few homes that have a computer, even fewer have Internet access. Several reasons that may explain the
lack of Internet access in homes are the high cost of Internet access, slow connection speeds (dial-up) and
lack of infrastructure for broadband connections in both urban and rural areas. Meanwhile, only 34.7% of
schools with computers have Internet access. Typically, a single computer is shared amongst 5 students in
elementary schools and 21 in middle and high schools [MEDUCA 2008]. It was, however, not clear in
[MEDUCA 2008] what percent of schools have made computers available to the students (e.g. in a computer
lab). In general, the access to computers in schools is very limited in Panama, as well as in other developing
countries. Overall, the data suggests that computers are treated more as an educational topic (e.g. children
learn how to use them) than as a learning tool (e.g. to help them improve reading or math skills).
Just as in other developing countries, mobile phones are the most-used computing technology in
Panama. As shown in Table 1, more than 70% of Panamanians have mobile phones (and this figure is even
more remarkable considering that around 50% of the population is below 24 years of age). One possible
explanation for the overwhelming use of mobile phones over the telephone is that mobile users can purchase
affordable prepaid cards (which provide an effective means for managing the cost). Another possible
explanation is that mobile phones offer a convenient means for communication in the vast rural areas, where
dedicated phone lines are not yet available.
Table 1. Technology access rate in Panama in 2007 [Contraloria 2008]
Technology access Percentage
Internet Users 15.99%
Mobile Phones users 71.54%
Homes with dedicated phone lines 14.30%
Homes with Computer 21.00%
Figure 1. Math exercise from a 5th grade book [Pérez et al. 1997] (left) and the same task on a mobile phone (right)
One remaining key issue is how to enable the transformation of schoolbook exercises into applications
that run on mobile phones. We propose two possible solutions: Either schoolbook publishers could offer the
exercises additionally in this form or teachers (without programming skills) could be provided with a simple
means for recreating the exercises on mobile phones for their pupils. Once the exercises are made available
on mobile phones, the children can work on the tasks during their long bus rides or at home. Since children in
urban areas spend 1/3 of their school time traveling in school buses, this technology could allow them to take
better advantage of this time. In general, the schoolbook exercise recreated on mobile phones can be
enhanced with the multimedia and network capabilities of new mobile phones. The incorporation of voice,
video, audio and pictures are very useful for the creation of learning language activities that can be used in
and outside the classroom and home environment.
Making these exercises available on the mobile phones presents two major advantages:
(1) Outdoor activities such as visits to museums or parks can be integrated into the learning experience,
and applications can be enhanced with the multimedia and network capabilities of mobile phones [Mitchell &
Race 2005].
(2) The high penetration rate of mobile phones together with the short lifecycle of mobile phones, i.e. 2
years [González 2005], will allow children to benefit from mobile learning technologies in the short and
middle terms.
5. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we have shown the potential of employing mobile phones for learning in Latin America.
Mobile hones have a high acceptance: In Panama, for example, more than 70% of inhabitants have a mobile
phone, whereas computers can only be found in about 20% of the households. Thus, mobile phones
constitute a good opportunity for children to access computing technology. Furthermore, mobile devices are
very well-suited to providing learning support, whether in multi-grade classrooms, in a school bus, or
outdoors on field trips. The multimedia and network capabilities of mobile phones make them ideal tools for
learning. Many low-end phones already offer platforms for running software, and it is possible to create
educational mobile phone applications based on the content of existing schoolbooks. The only missing
ingredient is providing teachers with a simple process that allows them to copy schoolbook exercises to
mobile learning applications. With such a process, teachers could effortlessly transform the mobile phone
into a powerful learning tool for entire classrooms of children. The children would benefit from having
greater access to computing technology, as well as more powerful learning appliances, which they can use
wherever they are. Future work should concentrate on mobile phone applications as useful complementary
tools for learning that can be integrated into the school environment.
REFERENCES
ANSEP 2008. Indicadores del Sector de las Telecomunicaciones en la República de Panamá. Autoridad Nacional de los
Servicios Públicos. Dirección Nacional de Telecomunicaciones. Panama, Panama.
Bentley, C. 2007. The OLPC Laptop: Educational Revolution or Devolution? Proceedings of World Conference on
ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education. Quebec, Canada, pp. 647-652.
Conectate 2006. Conectate al Conocimiento. Available at http://www.conectate.gob.pa. Retrieved on Jan. 3, 2009.
Contraloria 2008. Panamá en Cifras 2003-2007. Contraloría General de la República de Panamá, Dirección de
Estadísticas y Censo. Panama, Panama.
González, G. 2005. Chatarra Tecnológica nos Inunda. Martes Financiero No.392. La Prensa. Panamá, Panamá.
ITU. 2007. World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators. International Telecommunication Union. Geneva, Switzerland.
Lowe, J. 2002. Computer-based Education: It is a panacea? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 34,
No. 2, pp.163-171.
MEDUCA 2008. Estadísticas Educativas 2006. Ministerio de Educación de la República de Panamá. Dirección
Nacional de Planeamiento Educativo. Departamento de Estadísticas. Panama, Panama.
Mitchell, K. & Race, N. 2005. uLearn: Facilitating Ubiquitous Learning through Camera Equipped Mobile Phones.
Proceedings of IEEE Workshop Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education. Tokushima, Japan, pp. 274-281
Moraveji, N. et al. 2008. Mishief: Supporting Remote Teaching in Developing Regions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florence, Italy, pp. 353-362.
OLPC 2008(a). OLPC: Vision. Available at http://laptop.org/en/vision/index.shtml. Retrieved on Nov 18, 2008
OLPC 2008(b). Constructionism. Available at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Constructionism Retrieved on Nov. 13, 2008.
Pawar, U. et al. 2007. Multiple Mice for Retention Tasks in Disadvantaged Schools. Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. California, USA, pp. 1581-1590.
Pérez, Y. et al. 1997. Matemática 5. Ministerio de Educación de Panamá. Norma Editors. Bogotá, Colombia p. 46.