Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PETER R. BUSECK
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction ........................................................... P8
Geographyand historyof mining ........................................ PP
Previous studies ....................................................... 100
General geology ....................................................... 101
Sedimentaryrocks .................................................. 102
Igneous rocks ...................................................... 102
Structure .......................................................... 104
Metasomatism ......................................................... 104
Metallic mineralization ................................................. 108
Anhydrousiron oxides .............................................. 108
Sulfides and sulfo-salts .............................................. 114
Paragenesis........................................................ 115
Zoning ............................................................ 117
Controls of mineralization ........................................... 118
Comparisonwith Providencia........................................... 120
Quantitativeconsiderations............................................. 121
Dating ............................................................ 121
Geothermometry .................................................... 122
Heat flow estimate ............................................... 122
Pyrrhotite ...................................................... 124
Quartz fluid inclusions........................................... 125
Vaporpressures .................................................... 127
Origin andclassification ................................................ 150
Summaryand conclusions .............................................. 152
References ............................................................ 155
ABSTRACT
Concepcion
de10ro, the'second
largestcopperproducing
districtof
iVfexico,containssulfideand iron oxide mineralsdisseminated
in skarn
matrix surroundinga granodioritestock. The age (K-Ar) of the
stock is 40 q- 1.2 m.y. and the end of mineralization occurred at least
38 q- 1.2 m.y. ago, indicatingthat mineralizationwas approximatelycon-
temporaneous with emplacement.
Far from the stock wollastonlteis prominent,although temperatures
weretoolow to produceit in a dosedenvironment.Streaming,ascending
fluidspresumably
removedCO2 as rapidlyas formed,therebyfacilitating
the reaction between limestoneand enclosedsiliceouslayers. With in-
creasingmetasomatismandraditegarnetand other calc-silicates
formed,
mainlywithinlimestone
but alsoreplacingadjacentgranodiorite.
97
Magnetite, the earliest metallic mineral, occurs in limestoneas well
as skarn,but pyrite, specularite,chalcopyrite,
and the sulfo-salts(listed
in approximateorder of deposition)are restrictedto skarn.
Variations of oxygenfugacity and temperatureduring mineralization
are indicatedby at least four alternatinggenerationsof magnetiteand
hematite. The rangein fo•.is 10-xsto 10-•'5atm. Coexistingpyrite dur-
ing late-stagemineralization
fixesthe fs•.at 10-ø-*•' atto.
Quartz was depositedafter most metallic minerals. Fluid inclusion
filling temperatures
indicatea formationtemperatureof 350ø q- 35ø C, the
minimumtemperatureof mineralization. Pyrrhotite indicatesa (ques-
tionable) formation temperatureof 500ø C and a heat-flow estimate
demonstratesthat the maximum temperatureat the igneouscontact was
approximately500ø C, suggestingthat metallicmineralizationwas initiated
at the highesttemperatureswithin the contactaureole.
Nearby mesothermalto epithermaldepositsat Providenciaare related
to thoseat Concepciondel Oro. Both depositsare adjacentto essentially
identical stocks, occur within the same sedimentaryhorizons and both
occur at or closeto the igneouscontacts. A geneticcorrespondence be-
tween these deposits,as well as betweenhydrothermaland contactmeta-
somatic ores in other areas, suggeststhat the two types of deposits
are fundamentallyrelated. Moreover, measuredtemperaturesof Con-
cepcion del Oro ores fall within the range acceptedfor hypothermal
deposits.
It is suggestedthat these contactmetasomaticdepositsare properly
classifiedas a particular type within the larger genetic group of high
temperaturehydrothermaldeposits.
INTRODUCTION
Loredo
LEGEND
• Sedimentory
rocks
• Intrusive
rocks
:Torreon
Monterrey
(
•.•-F•Volcanic
rocks
CONCEPCION DEL
X'•----•
Faults
"lAnticlines
Caohuila peninsula
Miles Kilomelers
0 50 I00 0 I00 200
.-
Son Luis Potosi
The earliestpublication
on the districtwasby Burkart (9). The first
important contributions
to the geology weremadeduringthe TenthInter-
nationalGeologic Congress,namelyreportsby Villarello(52), Burckhardt
(8), andBergeat(5). The latterspenttwo weeksin the Concepcion del
Oro districtstudyingtheoredeposits.Shortgeologic discussions
werepub-
lishedby Chase(13), Castafiedo (12), andBuseck(10). Rogers,et al.
(42), present
a comprehensivepictureof theregional
geology.
The Concepcion
del Oro districtis in the Sierra Madre Orientalon the
southwestern
borderof thebeltof eastward
trending
folds(Fig. 1). The
anomalous
trendofthese ridges
istheresult
ofnortheast-southwest
compres-
sion,the formerCoahuilaPeninsula
highlandareasto the north-northwest
actingasa buttress(43).
LEGEND
•1 Qualernary
oltuvium
J• Terliary
canglamerote
• Upper Cretaceous
sediments
J•"•Lower
Gretaceaus
sechments
.11:[]
JurosslC
sediments
[] Torttory
granodmnte
.•[] Other
•gneaus
rocks
-- Cantoct
• Faull
K,Iomelers Miles
0 5 I0 3 6
FIG.2. Regional
geology oftheConcepcion
delOrodigtrict
(modified
fromRogers
etal.,1956). (Thetopstructure
should
belabelled
SierradeCanutillo.)
In the area immediatelysurroundingConcepciondel Oro there are four
east-trendinganticlinesmarked by ridges (Fig. 2). The crests are sup-
portedby the Upper JurassicZuloagalimestone,the predominant"mountain-
former" of the area. Lower Cretaceoussedimentscrop out farther down the
slopes. The relatively sparseUpper Cretaceousformationsare at the slope
bottomsand in the valleys,where they are largely coveredby alluvium.
All but one of the ridges contain minor igneous rocks ranging from
andesiticto rhyoliticin composition.Small intrusivemassesalso occuralong
the crests;however,in the Sierra de Concepcion del Oro there are two large
granodiorite bodies immediately adjacent to each other (Fig. 2). It is
aroundthesestocksthat the importantore depositsoccur.
SedimentaryRocks
The sedimentsin the district, ranging from Upper Jurassicto Upper
Cretaceous,are primarily grayish limestonescontainingargillaceous,silt-y,
chertyand locallyphosphatic layers. The youngestsedimentsare shalyand
are the only onesnot intersectedby the granodioritestock.
The limestones, asreportedin four chemicalanalyses givenby Bergeat(5,
p. 47), are relativelypure CaCOa. An exceptionis the normally siliceous
and chert-bearing La Caja, with 20.5 weightpercentSiOn,whereasthe other
sampleshave 3.2 percentor less SiO2. All containless than 2.2 percent
of total oxidesotherthan SiO2, CaO and CO•.
A detaileddescriptionof the stratigraphyis providedby Rogers, et al.
(42), and is summarizedin Table 1.
IgneousRocks
Two large granodioritestockscrop out in the Sierra de Concepcion del
Oro (Fig. 2). The ore depositsof the Concepcion del Oro districtoccur
aroundthe southernstock (Fig. 4) whereasthe Providenciagroup of de-
positsoccuraroundthe northernone. Only the former will be considered
here.
The granodioriteis holocrystalline;
it is equigranularin the centerof the
stock and porphyritic toward the periphery. Macroscopicallyrecognizable
are: plagioclase,
biotite,quartz,hornblendeand magnetite. Also presentare
orthoclase,diopside,and sparseapatite,spheneand zircon. Chemicalanalyses
of threespecimens are givenby Bergeat(5, p. 12): the composition of oneis
granodioriticgradingtowarda tonalite,whereastwo correspond to the average
composition of 65 hornblende-biotite
granodiorites
(39).
The granodioriteappearsto be clearly magmatic;silicatecrystallization
parallelsthe "reactionseries"of Bowen (6). The earliestrock-forming
mineral is diopside. It reactedwith the magmato form hornblende,which
is in turn shieldedby brown biotite alongits periphery. Simultaneously
with
the formation of the mafic minerals,basic plagioclasestarted crystallizing,
eventuallyto producethe mainmineralof the granodiorite-andesine (approxi-
matelyAb•o). The high calciumcontentof thesemineralswas presumably
produced
by assimilated
limestonestoped
fromthecountryrockduringmagma
emplacement.The lastsilicatesto form in the mainigneousrockswereortho-
dase,locallyperthitic,and quartz. Lime silicates,mainlygarnetand epidote,
are not uncommonin minor amounts,but probablyformedonly in areaswhere
there was a limestone inclusion.
Table 1
• black,
lenticular
limestone.
• i• Limestone,
gray,
argillaceous,
interbedded platy;
with bro•zniSh siltstone
• ! Indidura
200containing
fissile
shale
layers; easily eroded.
• Limestone,
medium-gray,
thick bedded;
weathers characteristic blue; con-
Taraises 140 tains minor nodular chert and pyrite
concretions; alternating with
brownish, poorly lithified siltstone.
• •• •• i
• La
CaJa 100 phosphatic;
shaleand chert layers;
easily locally
eroded.
• Limestone,
buff to darkgray,massive;
• • Zuloaga 40Ofew
argillaceous
layers,
locally stylolitic; main ridge former.
METASOMATISM
. ,
$ . .
• .
• ;-'.'".-'.;
'-••.•'-". , - .... •.%-: .' ....,'•.... ,.
Fz(;. 3. Metasomatism surrounding œracturedchert beds; limestone-skarn
contacts;magnetitein vugs. a) (top left) Chert beds,fracturedduring folding,
within Cupidolimestonethat yieldedby flowage. This is an exampleof the com-
petent"siliceousconduits." Silicatesaroundand betweenchert blocksindicate
metasomatism followingfolding. b)(top right) Localizationof initial silicafionto
siliceoushorizons. Fractured chert block in Taraiseslimestone,with chert rimmed
by narrow garnetband,a broaderwollastonitezone (white) and then relatively
fresh limestone. c) (lower left) ?arfiy silicatedCuestadel Cura limestoneindi-
caringirregular"front" of wollastonite and tremolitewithin otherwisefresh,un-
bleached limestone(lower left COmer). d.) (lower right) Vugs of coarsecalcite
(white) in massive
garnetskarn;magnetite
(darkgray) linestherugs,especially
their lower halves.
decreasing order of abundance, silicates found in the high-grade skarn near
the intrusionare: andradite-grossularite,
diopside,tremolite,epidote,zoisite,
scapolite,actinolite,idocrase,manganiferous hedenbergite
and, rarely, chlorite,
muscoviteand ilvaite. Quartz is sparse. The metallicmineralsare described
in the followingsection.
Among the several skarn silicatesthat occur locally and in only minor
amounts,one,manganiferous hedenbergitefrom the San Antonio mine, is un-
usual. It occursas dark green,radiating,bladed,almostplumosecrystalsup
to 10 cm long and is partly altered to yellow uralite. The hedenbergiteis
stronglypleochroicfrom dark holly greento yellowishapplegreen,to brown-
ish yellow. The 2V = 69ø -----
2 ø, ZAc = 35ø to 40% n• = 1.726,nt•= 1.732
andn• = 1.745. Thesepropertiescorrespond to a mineralcontaininga signifi-
cant amountof the johannsenitemolecule. The pyroxenecommonlyoccurs
with and replacesminorgarnetand calcite. Quartz, chalcopyrite
and hematite
also are interbladedbetweenthe hedenbergitecrystals and •tre probably
later.
Intense silicationresulting mainly in the formation of garnet is evident
closeto the igneouscontact. At La Perlita transitionfrom limestoneto al-
mostpuregarnetskarntakesplacewithin 3 m, the silicates
formingacross
the limestonebeddingin an irregular but sharp contact (Fig. 3c). This is
especiallytrue of wollastoniteand tremolite,the initial reactionproductswith
limestone. The massivegarnet and other silicatesare then within the "en-
velope"formedby thewollastonite
andtremolite. Moreover,thereis generally
no completegradationfrom limestoneto skarn. This, as well as the sharp
discontinuityacrossthe contact,suggeststhat the skarn formed almost
en masse,as alonga "front."
As in many regions,the effectsof metasomatism
are pronouncedin the
limestones;at Concepciondel Oro they have also been profound in the
granodioriteimmediatelyborderingthe contact. Thus, at Promontoriolenses
and veinletsof skarncontainingmainly brown garnetoccurwithin the igneous
rock. Near the former limestonecontactlenticularpodsof skarnare enclosed
withinthe granodiorite.Suchpodsare surrounded parallelto their lengthby
joints that are alsofilledwith lime silicates,clearlyindicatingthat the skarn
materialmigratedalongfractures. Each pod and fracture is borderedby a
thin zone of epidotizedgranodiorite. At Promontorioand La Perlita this
skarn has retained granitic and porphyritictextures and in some samples
plagioclase phenocrysts remain in the skarn, togetherwith local orthoclase,
quartz,and diopside.
The skarnificationof the igneousrock is as clear microscopicallyas it
is macroscopically.The most conspicuous effect of metasomatism is that
the granodioriteis bleachedto a creamcolor adjacentto the fracturesnow
filled with skarnsilicates. This is causedby the breakdownof biotite,partial
replacement of hornblendeand pyroxeneby a fibrousmineral, probably
tremolite, and local alteration of feldspar, mainly to sericite but also to
calciteand possiblytremolite. Epidoteand scapoliteare locallyabundant.
The texture of the resultinggroundmass is much finer and lessequigranular
locally even indistinguishable.Plagiodase phenocrysts,however, remain
identifiableexceptin areasof mostintensemetasomatism.
Garnet is the most abundant mineral within the fractures filled with calc-
silicates,thesebeing the probableconduitsfor the metasomatizing fluids.
Small, irregular grains and massesof garnet impingeon the igneousmin-
erals locally like an irregular "front," reminiscentof silicationof limestone.
With increasingmetasomatism the igneousmineralsoccuronly interstitially
to garnetand then,finally,not at all. Epidote,diopsideand idocraseoccurto-
gether with the garnet. The silicate areas within the granodioritecontain
at leastminor disseminated magnetite. Small vugs containingplaty specu-
larite, calciteand, lesscommonly,pyrite and chalcopyritealso occurwithin
someof the silicatedfractures,suggesting
that theseservedas "open"channel-
waysthroughoutmuchof the periodof mineralization.
Closeto the igneouscontactit is difficultto tell whether massiveskarn
formedfrom a sedimentaryor an igneoushost. Becauseof greaterabundance
of aluminain the igneousrock, garnet in granodiorite-derivedskarn is more
grossularitic than in limestone-derivedskarn. Some garnet contains car-
bonaceousmatter; as there is no carbonaceous material in the granodiorite,
suchgarnetdoubtless formedwithin limestone. The mostcertaincriterionof
an igneoushost,however,is a residualigneoustexture.
Fractureschannelingthe metasomatic fluidsexerteda stronginfluencein
determiningthe areasand extentof metasomatism.At the Promontoriolime-
stoneinlier, fracturesadjacentto and abovelimestonecontaingarnet; those
without limestonebelow are garnet free. This suggeststhat limestonewas
the sourceof the calciumin the garnet and confirmsthe ascendingnature of
the fluids.
The metasomatizing fluids,havingascended, may be relatedto minerali-
zation. Magnetite, specularite,pyrite and chalcopyrite,though later than
garnet,occurwithin skarnin granodiorite;thereis no evidencefor a distinct
timebreakbetweensilicationand deposition of theseminerals. Garnetlocally
veinsor replaces
magnetite
and hematite,and ilvaiteand chloriteare later
than certain sulfides. Silicationand mineralizationthereforemay-be phases
of a continuousprocess. It is likely that fluids having similar origins,
alteredonly by their interactionwith the countryrock, broughtaboutboth
skarnificationand ore deposition.The natureof the resultingmineralization
is discussed below.
METALLIC MINERALIZATION
AnhydrousIron Oxides
Magnetite
andhematite,
asprimary
minerals
sufficiently
concentrated
for
mining,occurin manycontactmetasomatic depositssuchas Cornwall,Iron
Springs,Fierro, and Heroult. At Concepcion
del Oro severalareashave
beenactivelyworkedfor iron oxides,althoughat the time of this study,
1958-1960,onlythe Sol y Luna minewasin operation.Howeyer,magnetite
and hematiteare the mostcommonmetallicmineralsin the district,appearing
LEGEND
Cuesta
del
Cura
limestone
La
Pe•a
formation
Cupido
hmestone
Taraises formation
La
Cajo
formatio•
Zuloacja
limestone
Granodiorlte
Mine
/ Fault
• DEL ORO
Old'
Smeller
ß <• ß
Cerro de
Los¾aios
> • ß <
<
• delArco
ß .
. .
ß . ß
Melers Feet
,• La Lola
Fxc.5. Ph0tomicrographs
of polished
sections.
a)(topleft) Tabular
specu-
laritccrystals
(white,viewed
edge-on),
partlyreplaced
by magnetite,(gray).
X 110. b) (top right) Magnetite(dark gray) beingreplacedby "powdery'hema-
tite lamellaealongthe magnetite(111) parting. X 400, oil immersion.c) (mid.
left)' Massivemagnetite(white) cut by garnet (light gray) veinlet,the centerof
which is filledwith calcite(dark gray); note euhedralmagnetitefacestoward
garnetand garnettowardcalcite. X 13. d) (mid. right) Chalcopyrite (white)
interleavedwith .andlater than bladedspecularitc(light gray); matrix is caldte
and manganiferous hedenbergite.X 110. e) (bottomleft) Tabular specularite
crystalspartly replacedby magnetite(dark gray); most magnetitehas been
replaced by fine-grainedhematite--because
of its differentorientationfrom the en-
closingspecularitc the fine-grainedhematitegivesthe specularitc a shadowyor
mottledappearance.Note that boththe eeplacing magnetiteand fine-grained
hematiteare in highlyirregularbodies.X 400,oil immersion.f) (bottomright)
"Powdery"hematitelamellaeselectively repladngcertainzonesof magnetite.
X 400, oil immersion.
(<0.001
mm wide)
in•-f-e-•ar--•/i•neiii;•>'•;}m;•;
fromt•;-C•ik
X;•oi•)"•i'•'•
•.
No othermagnetitecontained
suchfeatures.
Althoughnot as abundantas magnetite,hematiteis as widespread.It
occursin several .generations
in both specularand "powdery"f9rms--the
latterbeingfine-grained,
earthyandfriable. "Powdery"hematiteoccurswith
all magnetite,commonlyin slender,pencil-likerods arrangedin triangular
patternsparallelto the octahedral(111) magnetiteparting (Fig. 5b). The
hematiteis largelynearfracturesin or neargrain bordersof magnetite,indi-
.eatingthat it resultsfrom oxidation. In somespecimens certainmagnetite
zoneshave been selectivelyoxidized. As magnetiteis essentiallystoichi-
ometricat geologictemperatures, the variationsreflectedby the zonal re-
placementmustbe either structuralor the resultsof minor constituents
within
magnetitemafruitfulareafor furtherstudy.
Specularhematite,in contrastto "powdery"hematite,is commonin coarse
crystalsand in the absenceof magnetite. It is abundantin disseminations
and in late calcite-pyrite-chalcopyrite
veinletsin skarn as well as in adjacent
granodiorite, A 'striking occurrenceof speculariteis at the San Antonio
Ledge,a 90 m long ridge near the San Antonio mine portal. It lies within
coarselimestonecloseto the granodioritestock. The mineral composition
of this ledgeis simple•upwar'dsof 90 volumepercentis 'specularite;the re-
mainder is chert, "limonite," and clear quartz crystals several centimeters
long,growingon top of the hematite. The specularitecrystalstend to cluster,
their edgeslocallyforming rosettes. Elsewherethe crystals,up to 8 cm in
diameter,are in sinuousand peculiarlycontorted,bands,continuousfor a
meter or more. In a given band all the crystalsare approximatelythe same
size,but theygraduallydiminishin sizefrom bandto adjacentbandprogress-
ing closerto the center of curvatureof a set of bands,though everywhere
largerthanthe "powdery"hematite.
Speculariteformed later than most magnetite;as a result it crystallized
in differentareasand is not generallyassociatedwith magnetite. It is sparse
in the massivemagnetitebodies;where it doesoccur it is in rugs growing
on top of magnetitecrystals. The centersof somemagnetiteveinletsin skarn
containeuhedralspecularitecrystals. As the last filling of the rugs and
veinlets,the speculariremust have postdatedthe magnetite.
Characteristically
associatedwith specularite
is quartz,an unusualmineral
in the contactaureole. In someareasspecularite crystalsare surroundedby
quartz; elsewhere,prominentlyat the San Antonio Ledge, large, zoned,
euhedralquartz rests on speculariteplates. Locally the quartz zonesare
deflectedand skewedby the specularitc,
demonstrating
the later origin of
the silica. Nevertheless,the closeassociationof thesetwo minerals suggests
their essentialcontemporaneity.Further, the local associationof quartz
crystalswith albite,theyoungest
primarymineralin theaureole,indicates
that
quartz and thereforespeculariteare relativelylate, therebysubstantiating
the magne.tite-specularite
agerelationship.
Fluid inclusion
thermometry
of
quartz indicatesthat quartz formedat approximately
350ø C; specularite
crystallized
at slightlyhighertemperatures
doesnot. Tabular pseudomorphs of magnetiteafter specularitc(Fig.
occur;thesegradeinto specularite crystalscontainingirregularblebsof mag-
netite (Fig. $e), and indicatethat magnetitehas locallyreplacedspecularitc.
With great magnificationanother phase,almost in•stinguishable*from its
matrix, canbe noticedwithin the specularitc.It hasthe sameirregularshapes
as magnetitebut is not confinedto the centersof specularitecrystals. With
crossednicolsit exhibitsan orientationdifferentfrom the enclosingcrystals
(Fig. 5e). This materialis hematitewhichreplacedthe magnetitethat re-
placedspecularite.Confirmingthis relationship are hematiterods,lessthan
0.001 mm long, occurringwithin the tiny magnetiteblebswithin specularite.
Apparentlythe specularitc wassubjected t,oreducingconditions, producing ir-
regular,branchingmagnetite. Later, more oxidizingconditionsaltered the
magnetite. backto hematitewhichthenhada slightlydifferentorientation from
the originalspeculariteand henceis distinguishable.As the oxidationpro-
ceededfrom the exteriorof the specularite crystals,the last materialaffected
wasthe centralmagnetite,someof whichremainsas a metastable residue.
In view of the dissimilarnature and distributionof the speculariteand
"powdery"hematite,there can be little doubt that the two are of different
ages and formed under different conditions. Although the fine-grained
natureof the "powdery"hematitesuggests that it may be a supergene oxi-
dationproductof magnetite,Ramdohr (1961, oral communication) believes
that this "powdery"hematiteis definitelynot supergene,This is confirmed
at Promontorioby a veinletof specularire within magnetite;the specularitc
restson top of "powdery"hematitethat has replacedmagnetite. A studyof
superpositionand the consistentlydifferent crystallographicorientationof
the two 'hematitevarieties where in contact,suggeststhat the "powdery"
hematiteis older than the specularite. However, as this is the only instance
where an age relationshipcan be demonstrated,it is subject to further
verification.
The widespread distributionof the earliestiron oxide,magnetite,indicates
the pervasiveness of the early mineralizing fluids. After sufficienttime
to allow old channelwaysto closeand new onesto develop,specularitewas
deposited,probablypostdatingthe "powdery"hematitethat replacedmag-
netite. That the depositingfluidswere not highly oxidizingis indicatedby
the fact that the early magnetitewas not completelyaltered and, also, by
the replacementof some specularReby magnetiteshortly after deposition
of specularite.Followingthis, conditions againbecamerelativelyoxidizing,
and hematite replacedmuch magnetite. The sequenceof depositionis
thusmagnetite-"powdery" hematite-specularite-magnetite-"powdery"hematite.
Iron must have been introducedonly to form the specularireand earliest
magnetite,changesin the later generations then dependingon the oxygen
fugacity. However,the existenceof at leasttwo completemagnetite-hematite
cyclesindicatesthat therewere fluctuationsof temperatureor fluctuationsbe-
tweenrelativelyreducingand oxidizingconditionsduring iron oxide deposi-
tion. It followsthat, althoughunrecognizable, there probablywere yet other
generations of magnetiteand hematite. To the knowledgeof the authorsuch
! II•/LIIIIIIU Ut:lJU•lLIUII U• Lilt: allIl•/t[[UU• 1I UII UXl•.[t:• IIa• 1101.
elsewhere.
Sulfidesand Sulfo-Salts
The sulfidemineralsare of greatcommercial
importance in the Concepcion
delOro district. All but onemine (Sol y Luna) producesulfideore,mainly
bearing
copper
withsome
gold..Manysulfur-bearing
minerals
occurin minor
amounts,but the predominantonesare pyrite and chalcopyrite.These are
most abundant as disseminations in the coarse calcite within fractures and
rugs in skarn. The disseminations extendlaterallyinto the skarnas rounded
to euhedral crystalsassociatedwith specularite. The sulfidesare sparse
withinthegranodiorite and,in distinction
to magnetite,are absentin limestone.
Calcite-filledrugs displayingevidenceof magnetitegravity-'settlingwere
described in the previoussection. Sulfidesand specularite ar• concentrated
in the lowerparts of theserugs but are also"suspended" within the calcite.
Pyrite fills the centersof magnetiteveinletsconnectingthe rugs and chalco-
pyrite is contemporaneous with this pyrite. Thus the sulfideswere de-
positedafter magnetiteand formed roughly concurrentlywith calcite; the
gravitationalsettlingof the sulfideswas impededby the crystallizingcalcite.
Althoughneitherwidespreadnor abundant,numerousother opaquemin-
erals occurat Concepcion del Oro. Among theseare pyrrhotite, marcasite,
sphalerite,galena,enargite,tetrahedrite-tennantite,bornite,bismuthinite,na-
tive bismuth,wittichenite,
cosaliteandtetradymite.
In his descriptionof Concepciondel Oro, Bergeat (5) mentionedminor
pyrrhotitefrom an unspecifiedlocality. Exceptfor traceamountsin the mill
tailings,no pyrrhotitewas foundby the presentauthor. However,in 1961
pyrrhotitewas discovered midwaybetweenthe Cata Arroyo and Cabrestante
orebodies. It lies in the upper part of the La Caja formation less than
50 m from the granodiorite(Snively, 1961,written communication).Speci-
mensgiven the authorby Dr. Snivelyindicatethat the pyrrhotitecommonly
surroundseuhedralpyrite crystals. Elsewherechalcopyriteseparatesthe two
iron sulfides,suggestingthat pyrrhotiteand chalcopyrite
are approximately
contemporaneous and later than pyrite. In placeschalcopyritecuts the
pyrrhotite,indicatingthat chalcopyriteformed over a longer period than
pyrrhotite. Sphaleritereportedlyoccurswith pyrrhotite,but nonewas seen
in the availablespecimens.
A strikingfeatureof the pyrrhotiteis its widespread alteration,mainlyto
lameliarpyrite and minor marcasite. Except that no magnetitewas pro-
ducedin the pyrrhotitebreakdown, indicatinga lack of availableoxygen,this
materialis almostidenticalto pyrrhotitefrom Tem Piute, Nevada. Both
pyriteand pyrrhotiteare cut by veinletsof ilvaite,this beingoneof the rare
instances where a silicate is later than a metallic mineral.
At the Promontoriominebismuthinitehasreplacedchalcopyrite.Enargite
and tetrahedrite-tennantite
are complexlyintergrownwith the bismuthinite
and to someextent with chalcopyrite.Locally chalcopyrite
is rimmedby
enargite
whichis, in turn,surrounded
by a bandof tetrahedrite-tennantite,
in-
dicatingthat chalcopyriteis the oldestandtetrahedrite-tennantite
the youngest
of these minerals. Some sphalerite occurs in vermicular shapes within
chalcopyrite;elsewhereit is in large, discretegrains containingexsolved
chalcopyrite,lessthan 0.001 mm in diameter,in a roughlyrectangularpattern.
The sphaleriteexhibitsa nearly white internal reflection,suggestinga low
iron content.
Bismuthinite,enargite,tetrahedrite-tennantiteand sphaleriteare each un-
usualmineralsin this deposit;it is thereforestriking to find them all within
severalmillimetersof oneanother. With the possibleexceptionof sphalerite,
all are roughlycontemporaneous and yet later than chalcopyrite.Their as-
sociationand approximatecontemporaneity suggestthat they representa
late injection of mineralizingfluids or, more likely, that they could form
stablyonlyastemperatures fell.
Minor bismuthiniteand enargitereplacechalcopyritein the San Antonio
mine. Occurringwith them is a mineral with the appearanceof wittichenite,
but in amountstoo small for X-ray confirmation. It is opticallyidenticalto
materialfrom Wittichen,the type locality. Other grainsresembleemplectite,
and both minerals are possiblypresent. Although most witticheniteoccurs
within chalcopyrite,severalgrains were seencutting acrossand replacing
specularite.
Witticheniteis rarely surrounded by a "gray copper"mineral. Occurring
next to a bismuthmineral, it is likely that it too containsbismuth. As the
arsenicalvariety of the "gray coppers"is generallymore bismuth-rich,it
is probablethat the isotropicsurroundingmineral is the annivitevariety of
tennantite.
In oresfrom Cata Arroyo two other unusualmineralsoccur. The more
abundantonehasthe opticalpropertiesand etch reactionsof cosalite(HN'Oa,
1:1; HC1, 1:5; sat. FeC13; conc.KOH, KCN', were used). The other min-
eral is opticallyidenticalto tetradymite. Neither mineralis in large enough
grainsfor extractionfor X-ray determination, but the opticalidentification
was
kindly confirmedby ProfessorRamdohr (1961, oral communication).The
cosalitegenerallypartly surroundspyrite crystals,suggestingthat the sulfo-
salt is later. Tetradymiteis restrictedto the interiorsof the cosalitegrains.
There is little associationbetweenthe sulfur-bearingminerals and mag-
netite and the degreeto which they do occurtogethermay be random,except
insofar as all the metallic minerals slightly postdatedthe silicatesand were
depositedat roughlythe sametime from fluids travelingover similar paths.
The generalassociation of pyrite and especiallychalcopyritewith specularite
is in contrastto the lack of coexistenceof sulfideswith magnetite. Several
of the sulfo-saltsare also associated with specularite,thoughthis relation is
lessconspicuous.The presenceof specularitesuggests relativelyhigh partial
oxygenpressures;pyrite indicatesreasonably high partial sulfurpressures.
Para#enesis
The relativeagesof the mineralshave beenbriefly discussed
in the pre-
cedingpages;theserelationshipsare summarizedin Figure 6. The earliest
metallicmineralto form throughoutthe districtwasmagnetite;in only a few
instancesis pyrite earlier than magnetite. This generally early origin of
magnetite,combinedwith local areas where pyrite is of the same age or
earlier, is not surprising. In a literaturesurveyof depositsin which magne-
tite occursin sulfideores,age relationswere studiedfor 52 cases,and in 80
percentof themmagnetitewas the first metallicmineralto form (46). With
one exceptionthe earliestmineral to form in the remainingdepositswas
pyrite. The relationshipbetweenthe pyrite and magnetiteat Concepcion
del Oro is thussimilar to that of many other districts.
GARNET .'
MAGNETITE
PYRITE
PYRRHOTITE ....
'POWDERY"HEMATITE '-"-
SPECULARITE
CHALCOPYRITE
ENARGITE --
TETRAHEDRITE - TENNANTITE --
SPHALERITE ---
BISMUTH MINERALS ----
QUARTZ
A*DULARIA '-'
FI(•. 6. - Generalizedparagenesis
at Concepcion
del Oro.
Zoning
The main copperand iron mineralizationat Concepcion del Oro is im-
mediatelyadjacentto the intrusivebody. There, as well as in the inliers
within the stock (Promontorio,Las Animas, Carmen; Fig. 4), chalcopyrite,
magnetite,specularite,and pyrite are most abundant. The largestminesof
the Concepcion del Oro districtlie within this zone. Gold, from which the
districtderivedits name,alsooccursin minor amountsthroughouttheseareas.
Although of minor to negligibleeconomicimportance,other metalsalso
occur. Zinc and lead were producedfrom the Cata Arroyo mine, but only
occurredin the upperlevels. Farther from the stock,the La Perlira minecon-
tained rich lead-zinc-silver ores and some zinc was found in both the Delores
and the Angela mines. Small high-gradelead-silvershowingsoccur along
the Concepcion del Oro "thrust," southof the town of Concepciondel Oro,
and lead, zinc, and silver occurin the La Laja and E1 Balconmines. Traces
of mercuryand antimonyhave beenreportedyet farther from the intrusion.
Peripherallyoutwardfrom the stock,from areasof high temperaturesto
thoseof lower ones,there is clearly a progressivechangein mlneralization
from copperandthe anhydrous iron oxides,togetherwith minorgold,to zinc
and lead,togetherwith minor silver. Farthestfrom the intrusionand there-
fore in the coolestareas, traces of mercury and antimony are found. It is
not certain,however,that the mercuryand antimonyare relatedto the stock.
In any casezoningis only broadlyrecognizable and hasmanyvariations.
Controlsof Mineralixation
Why the ore is whereit is is one of the thorniestproblemsconnected with
mostmineraldeposits;Concepcion del Oro is no exception. Various struc-
tural and mineralogicalfeaturesare prominentin certain areas but there is
no obvioussingleand consistent controllingfactor.
Fissurecontrolis perhapsthe mostcommonsinglecausefor localizing
ore mineralizationthroughoutthe world. Contactmetasomatic deposits,how-
ever, are generallywithin or near carbonaterocks which, becauseof their
solubilityand plasticity,tend to "heal" open fractures. As a result fissure
controlin contactdepositsis less readily demonstrated than in most other
classesof deposits. At Concepciondel Oro the stressesproducedby the
emplacementof the granodioritecausedmyriads of fractures,each a few
centimetersor meterslong; theseare commonlymineralizod. Only few, how-
ever,are large enoughto yield a commercial vein and practicallynowheredo
fracture fillings form a strong, consistentpattern. The only important ex-
ceptionsto thisare somemineralizedveinsnear Aranzazuand the manysmall
northerlyfracturesat the Azulesopenpit.
As the metallic minerals occur within the zone of metasomatism it seemed
reasonable
that certaincalc-silicates
might havelocalizedthe ore selectively.
Although locally true, this is not the caseon a district-widebasis. At San
Antoriio the manganiferoushedenbergiteclustersgenerally contain inter-
bladed chalcopyriteand specularite. Chalcopyriteis found with tremolite
at Cata Arroyo and at Promontoriothe specularite,pyrite and chalcopyrite
are commonwithin calcite. The latter may reflect contemporaneity rather
than selectivereplacement.Magnetiteshowsa gre•ataffinityfor selectivere-
placementof calciteat Cata Arroyo, Promontorio,Sol y Luna, Las Animas,
and Carmen and in the many isolatedmagnetiteconcentrations all along the
igneouscontact. This magnetite-calcite relation is the only pronouncedand
widespreadassociationof a metallic mineral with a particular non-metallic
mineral and even this is not an invariableone as much magnetiteis found
within the skarn, not in contactwith calcite.
A remainingpossiblecontrol of mineralizationis the presenceof certain
rocktypes.Table2, compiled
largelyfromdataSupplied
by NormanSnively
(1960, oral communication), pointsto no suchcontrolby sedimentaryforma-
tions. The Providenciadepositsare includedto indicate that formations
not in contactwith the Concepciondel Oro stockmay also be mineralized.
However, the table is a simplificationas practicallyno depositis limited to
only one stratigraphichorizon. Near Concepcion del Oro the Zuloagalime-
stonecontainsa majority of the orebodiesbut this is apparentlybecausethe
Zuloagais the formationmost commonlyin confactwith the igneousbody.
Barry (33 mentions"severalidentifiablefavoi'ablebedsin the Zuloaga,"but
it is not clear,•in the light of the occurrence of mineralization within all but
the youngestformations,just how restrictivethis factor is. Except fo/' the
Azules mine and a few veins at Aranzazu, the igneousstock itself is essen-
tially unmineralized.
In short, neither fractures, particularrock types,nor specialmineralsserve
consistentlyto localize ore at Concepciondel Oro. The only feature
linked with t•heorebodies
consistently and the associated non-commercial
metallicoccurrences is the metasomaticband closeto the granodioritestock.
This characteristicand no other must then be the point of departurefor
determiningthe originandclassification
of the deposits.
Sizeable
ore deposits,
herecalledprovidencia,
occuralonga stocknext
to the one at. Concepciondel Oro. Their relationshipis of interest for
purposes
•ofclassification.
The two setsof deposits
.--Providenciaand Concepcion
del Ortv--,are'(1)
adjacent,
(2) withinthe samemajorfold, (3) nearigneous
contacts,
(4)
withinthesamesedimentary
horizons,(5) far fromothermajororedeposits,
ana (o) •n a region mat has seen l•ttle •gneous or hydrothermal activity since
mineralization.They occurnext to and are probablyderivedfrom the same
pluton.Thesefactssuggest
thatthetwodeposits
hada common
origin.There
are, however,many differences. Calc-silicatemineralsare minor at Provi-
dencia--athin, silicated
zoneoccursalongsomecontacts;eventhisis absentin
the uppermine levels. Most orebodiesoccurwithin a few hundredmetersof
Table
* Important producers
theigneous contact,butlittleoreoccursdirectlyalongthecontact.Further,the
oreminerals--galena, sphalerite andpyritesoccur with carbonate
gangue in
limestonewithinlarge"chimneys" havingfairly regularshapes and sharp
contacts.Temperatures of mineralization
rangefrom350ø to 200ø C (44);
the deposits are mesothermal to epithermal(48). At Concepcion del Oro
the calc-silicates
form in a wide, well-developed aureoleand the metallic
m,lmi •-•½•micopyr•m, pynt½, magncut½ aria 11½IIIaL1L•----IJ•J•JHI- WitHIll 1;II15
zonein orebodies having"assay"contacts.The main mineralizationoccurred
between500ø and 350' C; the depositsare contactmetasomatic.
Differencesin mineralizationbetweenthe two campsmay be due to the
maximum flow of the mineralizingfluids having occurredearlier at Con-
cepciondel Oro than at Providencia. This would have concentrated high-
temperaturemineralsin the one area and lower-temperaturemineralsin the
other. Alternatively,the Providenciadepositsmay have formedcloserto the
surfacethanthoseat Concepcion del Oro. Thus, muchProvidenciaore occurs
topographically higherthan the Concepcion del Oro ores. The hypothesized
differencein cover would have allowed mineralizingfluids to escapeto the
surfacemore rapidly at Providencia;the pressurewould have beenlessand
the number,width and continuityof openfracturesgreater,thus alsoexplain-
ing the differencein the degreeof skarn formation. Further, severalProvi-
deneta"chimneys"end at the granodiorite. The mineralizingfluids pre-
sumablytraveled upward along the contactsuntil they branchedinto the
limestoneto form the lead-zincdeposits. At greaterdepthsaloag the contact,
depositssimilarto thoseat Concepcion del Oro might occur. Also, zinc and
lead probablyoccurredin the erodedplaceswhich oncelay abovethe Con-
cepciondel Oro copperdeposits. This is confirmedto the extent that galena
and sphaleritewereminedfrom the upperCata Arroyo minelevels.
QUANTITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
K% Years Comments
(rsko•
•]• (T,•-
Kok• To)
T•- (\ Koksl
K•kol
)+ 1 +To
where ko and k• are the diffusivitiesof limestoneand granodiorite,Ko and
Kx are the corresponding thermal conductivities,T,• is the solidifyingtem-
4 km depth,a 30ø C/km geothermalgradientand a 20ø C surfacetemperature
andapplyingappropriatevaluesfor K and k (takenfrom Lovering,35; values
for diorite,presumablysimilar to granodiorite,are used) to the aboveequa-
tion, it is found that T, = 476ø C. If the depth of burial had been one
kilometergreater,T• would have beenraisedonly to 491ø C, showingthat
the overburdencorrectionis not large. The geothermalgradientwould also
not introducesignificantchangesbecauseif, in additionto the greater depth,
the gradient had been 40ø insteadof 30ø C/km, then T• would have been
Table 4
Las
Palomas
surface
surface 2256m.
2256 l;22 2232m.
23 2160 24m.32m.
96 53
22
1+23 2232 2 2160 72 23 74•
Vapor Pressures
There is evidencethat severalreactionstook placeinvolvingone or more
vaporphases. From thesereactions,usingthermochemical data,.it is possible
to calculatevaluesfor the fugacities(roughly, the effectivepartial pres-
sures) of the vapor phasesand thus provideinformationregardingthe en-
vironment of metasomatism-mineralization.
COs, Os, and S• are amongthe mostimportantgasestaking part in geo-
logicreactions. Severalmineralsat Concepcion del Oro are of use in de-
termining the fugacitiesof these vapors. The formation of wollastonite
determines the carbondioxidefugacity(lco•). Data regardingthe Io3 during
metasomatism is providedby the oxidationof carbonand during mineraliza-
tion is indicatedby magnetite-hematiteequilibria. The co-existence
of pyrite
with the iron oxidesfixes the Is2. For the calculations
it is assumed1) that
equilibriumoccurred,2) that the phasecompositions are adequatelyrepre-
sentedby stoichiometric formulasof their major elementalconstituents and
3) that the reactionscanbe representedin an anhydroussystem.
All of the reactionsdiscussed
in this sectiontook placebelowthe maximum
temperaturethat occurredin the contactaureole,approximately500ø C, and
presumably abovethe temperatureat whichthe quartzcrystalswere deposited,
approximately350ø C. However, the geothermometric measurements limit
the accuracyof the fugacitycalculations.If therewas considerableheat trans-
fer by hydrothermalfluids (as suggestedby Sawkins,44, for an adjacent
deposit) then the assumedupper temperaturelimit may be low and the cal-
culatedfugacityvaluesmisleading.Thus, two models,one assumingmaxi-
mum and the other minimum temperatures,will be 'used to outline the
maximumrange of the fugacityvalues. To allow for possibleerror in the
heat flow estimate,a maximumvalue of 600ø C will be arbitrarily assumed.
Much freshlimestonecontainscarbon;with increasingmetasomatism this
migrates, serving as a rough indicator of the intensity of metamorphism.
Where the limestoneis fresh the carbonoccursas tiny flakes along calcite
grain bc•undaries.More intenseconditionscause it to collect in irregular
segregationsin which the calcitegrainsare much smallerthan in the surround-
ing limestone. Silicateporphyroblasts tend to crystallizein thesecarbonaceous
areas,apparentlybecausethe fine-grainedcalcitewithin them is more reactive
than the surroundingcoarsercalcite. With increasingsilicationthe sur-
roundingcalcitebecomescompletelyclear; in areaswhere the metamorphic
intensitywas greatest,carbonis no longerpresent,having escapedprimarily.
as COs:
<c>+ (os) -0 (cos).
In the presenceof graphitethe ratio of the carbondioxidefugacity(fco=) to
the oxygenfugacity(fo=) is fixed throughthe equilibriumconstantK,,
fco•
K•-
which can, in turn, be relatedto the free energyfor the reactionthroughthe
relation
/•Gv = -RTlnK•.
Using free energy data of Kubaschewskiand Evans (26), the resulting re-
lationshipis:
log•o• = logleo=- 20,595/T + 0.044. (1)
The ico=may be determinedfrom studyingthe formationof wollastonite,
a silicate commonnear bleachedlimestone,i.e., limestonefrom which the car-
bon has been largely removed. Wollastoniteforms from calcite and quartz
accordingto the reaction:
(CaCos)+ (SiOn)= (CaSiOs)+ (COs),
releasingCO2 in the process. For this reaction,log Pco• can be determined
from the extrapolationof the experimentaldata of Harker and Tuttle (16)
or from the theoreticalexpressionof Danielsson(14), assumingideal state
conditions.These valuesand the corresponding valuesfor io•, calculated
from equation(I), are given in Table 5. As the fugacityis less than the
pressure,the indicatedpressuresare maximumvaluesfor the fugacity. The
mostprobablevaluefor the1'o•.
duringtheoxidationof carbonandformationof
wollastonite is between 10-•-•and 10-•-• atm.
Hematite-magnetiteequilibria
provide independentdataregarding
the
in the contactaureole.However,as the iron oxidesweredeposited after
wollastonite
andcarbonoxidation, the fugacityvaluesprovided
by the iron
oxides areapplicable
to a laterstagein thegeologichistory.
TABLE 5
4.
$10•
Ft -20 I
.e- I
<:[
v I
I
•1 II
0
I
I
o_ -25
C• SiO2
0
I
I
I
I
-30
1ø½
Fro. 7. Calculatedplot of oxygenfugacity (fo2) versustemperaturefor reac-
tions betweeniron oxidesand silica (after Turnock and Eugster, 1962). If silica
is absentthe boundarycurvesbetweensilicaand fayalite can be ignored. The lower
case letters indicate the approximate conditions under which the several iron
oxides formed.
Ka- (,fo,)
t
for the reaction
Duration of •nineralization:
1) Emplacement of the granodioriteoccurred40 q- 1.2m.y. ago.
2) Metasomatismand most mineralizationterminateda minimum of
38 q- 1.2 m.y. ago. Thus the stock and ores are essentiallycon-
temporaneous.
Metasomatism :
Conditionsduringoredeposition:
1) Geothermometricmeasurementsand calculationsindicate that:
a) 500ø C was the approximatemaximumtemperatureat the contact
of the stock(basedon heatflow estimate).
b) 500ø C was the approximatemaximumtemperatureof mineraliza-
tion (based on pyrrhotite measurementsmperhaps invalid), sug-
gesting that mineralizationmay have occurred at the maximum
temperaturesin the aureole.
c) 350ø C --+35ø C wasthe approximateminimumtemperatureof min-
eralization(fluid inclusionfillingtemperatures).
2) Thermochemical calculationssuggest that:
a) limitingvaluescorresponding to the maximumtemperature range
are Io2= 10-•4 to 10-3•' atm; leo2= 900 to 8 atm; rs2= 10-• to
10 -s atm.
Genesis:
DEPARTMENTSOFGEOLOGYANDCHEMISTRY,
ARIZONASTATEUNIVERSITY,
TEMPE, ARIZONA,
,,tpri110,1965
REFERENCES
1. Arnold, R. G., and Reichen,L. E., 1962, Measurementof the metal contentof naturally
occurring, metal-deficient,hexagonalpyrrhotite by an X-ray spacing method: Am.
Mineralogist, v. 47, p. 105-111.
2. Bain, G. W., 1936, Mechanicsof metasomatism:EcoN. GEOL.,V. 31, p. 505--526.
3. Barry, J. G., 1952, Geologyof the silver-lead-zinc
depositsof the Avalos-Providencia
dis-
trict of Mexico (discussion): Min. Eng., v. 4, p. 1083-1084.
4. Bateman, A.M., 1950, Economicmineral deposits:John Wiley, N.Y., 916 p.
5. Bergeat,Alfred, 1910, La granodioritade Conceptiondel Oro en el Estado de Zacatecasy
sus formatJones de contacto: Inst. Geol. Mexico, Bol. 27.
6. Bowen, N. L., 1928, The evolution of the igneousrocks: Princeton, Princeton Univ.
Press, 332 p.
7. Buddington,A. F., 1959, Granite eraplacementwith special reference to North America
(a review): Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 70, p. 671-748.
8. Burckhardt, Carlos, 1906, G•ologie de la Sierra de Conceptiondel Oro: Internat. Geol.
Cong., Mexico, 10th sess.,Guide des Excursions,No. 24.
9. Burkart, Joseph,1836, Aufenthalt und Reisen in Mexico in den Jahren 1825 bis 1834:
Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart's Verlagshandlung.
10. Buseck, P. R., 1961, Contact metasomaticores at Conceptiondel Oro, Mexico (abs.):
Geol. Soc. America Spec. Paper 68, p. 144.
11. , 1962, Pyrrhotite from Tern Piute, Nevada: Ann. Rept. Geophys.Lab., Carnegie Inst.
Wash. Year Book 61, p. 161-163.
12. Castafiedo, Jos•, 1927, Los distritos cupriferos de Mazapil y Conception del Oro del
Estado de Zacatecas: Bol. Minero, v. 24, p. 443-453.
13. Chase, Thorington, 1909, Conception del Oro district, Mexico: Mining World, v. 31,
p, 1068.
14. Danielsson, Allan, 1950, Das Calcit-Wollastonitgleichgewlcht:Geochim. et Cosmochim.
Acta, v. 1, p. 55-69.
15. Greenwood, H. J., 1962, Metamorphic reactions involving two volatile components: Ann.
Rept. Geophys.Lab., Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Book 61, p. 82-85.
16. Harker,R. I., andTuttle,O. F., 1956,Experimental
dataon the Peov.-Tcurvefor the
reaction: calcite+ quartz----wollastonite+ carbon dioxide: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 254,
p. 239-256.
17. Holland, H. D., 1959, Some applicationsof thermochemicaldata to problemsof ore de-
posits. I--Stability relations amongthe oxides, sulfides,sulfates and carbonatesof ore
and gangue minerals: EcoN. G,•OL.,v. 54, p. 184-233.
18. Holser, W. T., 1947, Metasomaticprocesses:Ecoa. GEOL.,V. 42, p. 384--395.
19. Ibarra, Jesfis, 1930, Informe general de la regi6n minera comprendidaen las Munici-
palidades de Mazapil, Conception del Oro y San Pedro de Ocampo del Estado de
Zacatecas: Bol. Minero, v. 29, p. 255-278.
20. Jaeger, J. C., 1957, The temperaturein the neighborhoodof a cooling intrusive sheet:
Am. Jour. Sci., v. 255, p. 306-318.
21.--., 1959, Temperatures outside a cooling intrusive sheet: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 257,
p. 44-54.
22. Jones,R. B., 1934, Temperature relations to ore deposition: Ecoa. GEOL.,V. 29, p. 711--724.
23. Kennedy, G. C., 1950, Pneumatolysisand the liquid inclusion method of geologic
thermometry: Ecoa. G,•OL.,v. 45, p. 533-547.
24. King, P. B., 1947, Carta Geo16gicade la Parte Septentrional de la Repfiblica Mexicana:
Cartas Geologicasy Mineras de la Republica Mexicana, No. 3, Mexico Universidad
Nacional Inst. Geol. Geofis. y Ge6d.
25. Knopf, Adolf, 1942, Ore depositionin the pyrometasomaticdepositsi• Ore depositsas
related to structural features, ed. W. H. Newhouse: Princeton Press, Princeton, N.J.,
p. 63-72.
26. Kubaschewski, O., and Evans, E. LL., 1958, Metallurgical thermochemistry: Pergamon
Press, London.
27. Kullerud, Gunnar, Doe, B. R., Buseck, P. R., and Troften, P. F., 1963, .Heating ex-
periments on monoclinicpyrrhotites: Ann. Rept. Geophys.Lab., Carnegie Inst. Wash.
Year Book 62, p. 210-213.
28. Lamey, C. A., 1961, Contact metasomaticiron depositsof California: Geol. Soc. America
Bull., v. 72, p. 669-677.
29. Larsen, E. S., Jr., 1945, Time required for the crystallization of the great batholith of
southern and lower California: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 243-A (Daly volume), p. 399-416.
;•0. Lasky, •. •., 1931, The systems iron oxides: COs: GO, and iron oxides: H20:H2, as
applied to limestonecontactdeposits: EcoN. GxoL., v. 26, p. 485-495.
31. Lindgren,Waldemar, 1933, Mineral deposits:New York, McGraw-Hill, 930 p.
32. Locke, Augustus, 1933, Disseminatedcopperdeposits4a Ore depositsof the western states
(Lindgren volume): New York, Am. Inst. Min. Met. Engrs., p. 616-623.
33. Loughlin, G. F., and Behre, C. H., Jr., 1933, Classificationof ore deposits,da Ore deposits
of the western states (Lindgren volume): New York, Am. Inst. Min. Met. Engrs.,
p. 17-z55.
34. Lovering, T. S., 1935, Theory of heat conductionapplied to geologicalproblems: Geol. Soc.
America Bull., v. 46, p. 69-94.
35. --., 1936, Heat conduction in dissimilar rocks and the use of thermal models: Geol. Soc.
Amer. Bull., v. 4?, p. 87-100.
36. •., 1961, Sulfide ores formed from sulfide-deficient solutions: Eco•r. G•.or•., v. 56,
p. 68-99.
37. Mapes, ¾., Eduardo, 1965, Geologia y yacimientosminerales de los distritos de Avalos y
Concepclondel Oro, Zacatecas: Consejode Rec. Nat. no Renov. (in preparation).
38. Maxwell, J. C., and ¾errall, Peter, 1953, Expansion and increase in permeability of car-
bonate rocks on heating: Am. Geophys.Union Trans., v. 34, p. 101-106.
39. Nockolds, S. R., 1954, Average compositionsof some igneous rocks: Geol. Soc. America
Bull., v. 65, p. 1007-1032.
40. Park, C. F., Jr., and MacDiarmid, R. A., 1964, Ore deposits: W. H. Freeman, San Fran-
cisco,475 p.
41. Roealder,Edwin, 1962, Studies of fluid inclusions I: Low temperature application of a
dual-purpose freezing and heating stage: Ecoa. GzoL, v. 57, p. 1045-1061.
42. Rogers, C. L., Cserna, Zoltan De, Taverna, Eugenio, and Ullos, Salvador, 1956, General
geology and phosphate deposits of Conception del Oro district, Zacatecas, Mexico:
U.S. Geol. Survey Bull., 1037-A.
43.--., Cserna, Zoltan De, Rivera, I. O., and Vloten, R. van, 1962, Tectonic framework
of an area within the Sierra Madre Oriental and adjacent Mesa Central, North Central
Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 450-C.
44. Sawkins, F. l., 1964, Lead-Zinc ore deposition in the light of fluid inclusion studies,
Providencia Mine, Zacatecas, Mexico: Ecos. Gzo% v. 59, p. 883-919.
45. SchneiderhShn,H., 1932, Die genetischeEinteilung der Gesteine und Minerallagerstatten:
Zeitschr. Prakt. Geologic, v. 40, p. 168-172.
46. Schwartz,G. M., and Ronbeck,A. C., 1940, Magnetite in sulfide ores: Eco•r.
v. 35, p. 585-610.
47. Thompson, J. B., •[r., 1959, Local equilibrium in metasomatic processes,in Researches in
Geochemistry, P. H. Abelson, ed.: New York, •[ohn Wiley, p. 427-457.
48. Triplett, W. H., 1952, Geology of the silver-lead-zinc deposits of the Avalos-Providencia
district of Mexico: Min. Eng., v. 4, p. 583-600.
49. Turnock, A. C., and Eugster, H. P., 1962, Fe-Al oxides: Phase relationships below
1000ø C: Jour. Pet., v. 3, p. 533-565.
50. Tuttle, O. F., and Bowen, N. L., 1958, Origin of granite in light of experimental studies
in the system NaA1SiaOs-KAISi8Os-SiO2-H20: Geol. Soc. America Mere. 74, 153 p.
51. Van Orstrand, C. E., 1935, Normal geothermal gradient in United States: Am. Assoc.
Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 19, p. 78-115.
52. Villarello, •. D., 1906, Le mineral d'Aranzazu: Internat. Geol. Cong., Mexico, 10th sess.,
Guide des Excursions, No. 25.