USER GUIDE FOR THE ITEM ANALYSIS TEMPLATE © Balajadia 2014

General Directions:
1. Supply the "Worksheet" heading with the necessary data for Division, District, School, Subject, Grade-Section, Exam Title, Period, School Year, Name of Teacher.
2. Arrange checked and scored test papers from highest to lowest scorers.
3. Separate the highest 27% and the lowest 27%. Indicate the total number of students and the number of highest 27% in the "Worksheet" accordingly.
4. Tally the responses of students in the highest 27% (vertical) per item number (horizontal) in the yellow cells. Encode "1" for a correct answer and "0" for a wrong answer. Please, note that if you leave
student 1 blank on a particular item, it means that there are no data for that item.
5. Do step 4 for the lowest 27% in the pink cells.
6. Click the "Main Report" tab below to check the final report ready for interpretation. There is nothing to modify in this page.

Guide for Interpretation

1. Accept as it is. - No revision is needed because the level of difficulty and the discriminating power are enough. Retain the item and can be used again in future exams.
2. Accepted with very slight revision. - You can right away accept and retain the item or make little changes depending on the level of difficulty.
3. Accepted with slight revision. - The item is retained with slight increase or decrease of difficulty as regards the P.
4. May be accepted with minor revision. - The item may be retained or discarded as how you personally evaluate it. If retained, the level of difficulty and choices may be changed.
5. Major revision on the stem / choices. - If you think the item will be ratained, paraphrase the stem and replace the choices which no one chose for an answer.
6. Needs major revision or discarded. - Total paraphrasing of the stem and replacement of non-selected choices should be made. Better yet, discard the item.
7. Totally discard. - The item has to be discarded because it is either too easy or too difficult and is unable to distinguish the low performers from the high performers.
Notes: There are locked cells which you cannot modify to totally prevent errors and misencoding.The "Main Report" sheet is protected, therefore, no midification is necessary.

Instruction for writing the descriptive analysis

A. On the difficulty level of items
1. Group together the items having the same difficulty levels and infer on the topics or competencies the students achieved.
2. Highlight the items of "moderate difficulty" and explain that these items can challenge the students enough to think analytically and critically. Nitko and Brookhart (2011) explain that items with
moderate difficulty are better than those which are very easy or very difficult. In this way, students are genuinely tested of their analytical and critical thinking skills.
3. You may also describe easy items to be indicators of most learned concepts, likewise, difficult items signal the least learned competencies.
B. On the discrimination indices of items
1. Group together the items having the same discrimination indices and infer on the item on its ability to distinguish who thinks more analytically or don't.
2. Items that are very discriminating should be emphasized to discuss the credibility of the test in eliciting authentic learning abilities of students.
3. You may also mention about those which are discriminating and moderately discriminating to be reconsidered after some necessary revision.
4. Infer on the resulting items being non-discriminating and questionable.
C. On the final decision
1. Group together the items having the same decisions and infer on each item on its validity, reliability, and objectivity.
2. Commend the items that are to be accepted and retained right away.
3. Cite examples of revision of some items if there are.
4. Write a general impression of the entire test.

Printing and submission

1. Print the "Main Report" without any modification. Study the table(s).
2. Click the "Interpretation" tab below and accomplish your discussion as specified therein. Print.
3. Submit your report in the following order:
3.1 Main Report
3.2 Interpretation and Desriptive Analysis Report
3.3. Copy of the TOS and Test Paper with correct answers.
Division: Schools Division of Nueva Ecija District: Cabiao School: Cabiao National High School

Subject / Grade - Section Grade 8 - C. ROMERO Total Number of Students: 44

Exam Title / Period / School Year Second Periodical Test / SY 2018-2019 Number of highest scorers (27%): 12
Name of Teacher Gemma P. Catalan Number of lowest scorers (27%): 12

HIGHEST SCORERS LOWEST SCORERS

Total Total
item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Correct item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Correct

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 7 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 8
8 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 8 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 8
9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 8
13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
15 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 9 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

© Balajadia 2014
20 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 8 20 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 8
21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 4 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 9 31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
33 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
34 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 9 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 10 35 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 8
36 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 10 38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
40 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 5
41 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
42 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 3
43 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
44 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
45 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3
46 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
47 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 9 48 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 3
49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
50 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 50 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 4

© Balajadia 2014
Total>>> 42 41 39 38 38 36 36 35 34 34 34 34 0 0 0 Total>>> 22 22 22 22 22 23 25 26 26 26 26 26 0 0 0

© Balajadia 2014

© Balajadia 2014
 Department of Education - Region III
Schools Division of Nueva Ecija
Cabiao
Cabiao National High School

ITEM ANALYSIS IN Grade 8 - C. ROMERO

Second Periodical Test / SY 2018-2019

Exam Title / School Year

Total Students (100%): Name of Teacher: Gemma P

44 Highest Scorers (27%): 12 Lowest Scorers (27%): 12 24

Total Total Difficulty Index Discrimination Index

Total Correct
Item # Correct Correct (high+low) P Interpretation D Interpretation
(high) (low)

1 5 4 9 0.38 Difficult 0.08 Moderately Discriminating

2 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
3 2 12 14 0.59 Moderately Difficult -0.84 Questionable
4 0 0 0 0.00 Very Difficult 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
5 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
6 0 0 0 0.00 Very Difficult 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
7 10 8 18 0.76 Easy 0.17 Moderately Discriminating
8 7 8 15 0.63 Easy -0.08 Moderately Discriminating
9 2 0 2 0.08 Very Difficult 0.17 Moderately Discriminating
10 7 0 7 0.29 Difficult 0.59 Discriminating
11 7 0 7 0.29 Difficult 0.59 Discriminating
12 4 8 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult -0.34 Not Discriminating
13 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
14 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
15 7 0 7 0.29 Difficult 0.59 Discriminating
16 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
17 2 0 2 0.08 Very Difficult 0.17 Moderately Discriminating
18 9 12 21 0.88 Very Easy -0.25 Not Discriminating
19 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
20 8 8 16 0.67 Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
© Balajadia 2014
21 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
22 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
23 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
24 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
25 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
26 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
27 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
28 7 12 19 0.80 Easy -0.42 Not Discriminating
29 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
30 4 0 4 0.17 Very Difficult 0.34 Discriminating
 31 9 12 21 0.88 Very Easy -0.25 Not Discriminating
32 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
33 1 0 1 0.04 Very Difficult 0.08 Moderately Discriminating
34 9 12 21 0.88 Very Easy -0.25 Not Discriminating
35 10 8 18 0.76 Easy 0.17 Moderately Discriminating
36 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
37 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
38 10 12 22 0.93 Very Easy -0.17 Moderately Discriminating
39 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
40 10 5 15 0.63 Easy 0.42 Discriminating
41 9 2 11 0.46 Moderately Difficult 0.59 Discriminating
42 12 3 15 0.63 Easy 0.76 Very Discriminating
43 5 4 9 0.38 Difficult 0.08 Moderately Discriminating
44 12 2 14 0.59 Moderately Difficult 0.84 Very Discriminating
45 10 3 13 0.55 Moderately Difficult 0.59 Discriminating
46 9 2 11 0.46 Moderately Difficult 0.59 Discriminating
47 12 0 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 1.01 Very Discriminating
48 9 3 12 0.51 Moderately Difficult 0.51 Discriminating
49 12 12 24 1.01 Very Easy 0.00 Moderately Discriminating
50 5 4 9 0.38 Difficult 0.08 Moderately Discriminating

Summary of Results
1.Accepted as it is………………………….. 9 4.May be accepted with minor revision…… 7 7.Totally discard…..
2.Accepted with very slight revision……… 5 5.Major revision on the stem or choices…. 3
3.Accepted with slight revision……………. 1 6.Needs major revision or be discarded….. 18
Signature/Date:
Item analysis in: Grade 8 - C. ROMERO Second Periodical Test / SY 2018-2019

© Balajadia 2014
nt of Education - Region III
s Division of Nueva Ecija
Cabiao
National High School

am Title / School Year

Gemma P. Catalan
page 1/2

Decision

4.May be accepted with minor revision.

6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
7.Totally discard.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
5.Major revision on the stem or choices.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
4.May be accepted with minor revision.
4.May be accepted with minor revision.
7.Totally discard.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
4.May be accepted with minor revision.
1.Accepted as it is.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
7.Totally discard.
1.Accepted as it is.
4.May be accepted with minor revision.
© Balajadia 2014
1.Accepted as it is.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
1.Accepted as it is.
7.Totally discard.
1.Accepted as it is.
5.Major revision on the stem or choices.
 7.Totally discard.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
7.Totally discard.
5.Major revision on the stem or choices.
1.Accepted as it is.
1.Accepted as it is.
7.Totally discard.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
3.Accepted with slight revision.
2.Accepted with very slight revision.
2.Accepted with very slight revision.
4.May be accepted with minor revision.
1.Accepted as it is.
2.Accepted with very slight revision.
2.Accepted with very slight revision.
1.Accepted as it is.
2.Accepted with very slight revision.
6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
4.May be accepted with minor revision.

7
page 2/2

Gemma P. Catalan

© Balajadia 2014
 Department of Education - Region III
Schools Division of Nueva Ecija
Cabiao
Cabiao National High School

ITEM ANALYSIS IN Grade 8 - C. ROMERO

Second Periodical Test / SY 2018-2019
Exam Title / School Year

Interpretation and Descriptive Analysis

Test Difficulty

Test Discrimination

Final Impression

Analyzed and reported by:

Gemma P. Catalan
Teacher
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
Schools Division of Nueva Ecija
EXEQUIEL R. LINA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion Norte, Licab, Nueva Ecija

TEST RESULT IN FILIPINO 10

Second Periodical Test
School Year 2017-2018

Filipino 10 N HPS HSO LSO Mn MPL MPS

Over-all 235 50 45 14 34.28 68.55 69.18

Grade and Section N HPS HSO LSO Mn MPL MPS

SP-ICT 10 32 50 45 21 35.28 70.56 71.15
10-RIZAL 52 50 43 20 33.08 66.15 66.83
10-BONIFACIO 51 50 44 21 35.16 70.31 70.91
10-GOMEZ 47 50 43 20 34.68 69.36 69.97
10-MABINI 53 50 44 14 33.19 66.38 67.05

Prepared by:

CHERRY ANN A. SANTOS

Teacher III
Chairman, Filipino 10

Checked by:

JOSELITO S. MALAMANIG
Head Teacher III
Filipino Department
Noted:

TEODORA D. VITUG
School Principal IV

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
Schools Division of Nueva Ecija
EXEQUIEL R. LINA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion Norte, Licab, Nueva Ecija

MOST AND LEAST LEARNED IN FILIPINO 10

Second Periodical Test
School Year 2017-2018

Grade 10 N= 235
Item Most Learned
Rank
Number Skills / Concepts
26 1 Pagtukoy sa aspekto ng pandiwa ng salitang ginamit sa
27 2 Pagtukoy sa aspekto ng pandiwa ng salitang ginamit sa
29 3 Pagtukoy sa sukat o bilang ng mga mga pantig ng tula
21 4 Pagtukoy sa aral na ipinahihiwatig sa akda
25 5 Pagtukoy sa aspekto ng pandiwa ng salitang ginamit sa
44 6 Pagtukoy sa pokus ng pandiwa sa pangungusap
36 7 Pagtukoy sa tayutay sa pagmamalabis o hyperbole sa pa
8 8 Pagtukoy sa uri ng akdang pampanitikan na maikling kuw
18 9 Pagtukoy sa uri ng akdang pampanitikan na mitolohiya
45 10 Pagtukoy sa pokus ng pandiwa sa pangungusap

Item Least Learned

Rank
Number Skills / Concepts
46 1 Pagbuo ng isang talumpati batay sa isyung panlipunan ng
47 2 Pagbuo ng isang talumpati batay sa isyung panlipunan ng
48 3 Pagbuo ng isang talumpati batay sa isyung panlipunan ng
49 4 Pagbuo ng isang talumpati batay sa isyung panlipunan ng
 50 5 Pagbuo ng isang talumpati batay sa isyung panlipunan ng
15 6 Pagtukoy sa layunin ng binasang akda
24 7 Pagtukoy sa pangkat ng pandiwa ang ginagamit sa pokus
43 8 Pagtukoy sa pokus ng pandiwa sa pangungusap
42 9 Pagtukoy sa pokus ng pandiwa sa pangungusap
1 10 Pagtukoy sa mga pahayag ng tagapagsalita sa talumpati

Prepared by:

CHERRY ANN A. SANTOS

Teacher III
Chairman, Filipino 10

Checked by:

JOSELITO S. MALAMANIG
Head Teacher III
Filipino Department

Noted:

TEODORA D. VITUG
School Principal IV
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
Schools Division of Nueva Ecija
EXEQUIEL R. LINA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Poblacion Norte, Licab, Nueva Ecija

ITEM ANALYSIS IN FILIPINO 10

Second Periodical Test
School Year 2017-2018

Grade 10 *N= 235 Grade 10 N=* 235

Item Correct Level Item Correct Level
% %
Number Responses of Mastery NumberResponses of Mastery
1 9 7.09 LM 26 24 18.91 LM
2 24 18.91 LM 27 12 9.46 LM
3 14 11.03 LM 28 19 14.97 LM
4 0 0.00 0 29 12 9.46 LM
5 24 18.91 LM 30 4 3.15 LM
6 0 0.00 0 31 21 16.55 LM
 7 18 14.18 LM 32 24 18.91 LM
8 15 11.82 LM 33 1 0.79 0
9 2 1.58 LM 34 21 16.55 LM
10 7 5.52 LM 35 18 14.18 LM
11 7 5.52 LM 36 12 9.46 LM
12 12 9.46 LM 37 12 9.46 LM
13 24 18.91 LM 38 22 17.34 LM
14 24 18.91 LM 39 24 18.91 LM
15 7 5.52 LM 40 15 11.82 LM
16 12 9.46 LM 41 11 8.67 LM
17 2 1.58 LM 42 15 11.82 LM
18 21 16.55 LM 43 9 7.09 LM
19 12 9.46 LM 44 14 11.03 LM
20 16 12.61 LM 45 13 10.24 LM
21 12 9.46 LM 46 11 8.67 LM
22 24 18.91 LM 47 12 9.46 LM
23 24 18.91 LM 48 12 9.46 LM
24 24 18.91 LM 49 24 18.91 LM
25 24 18.91 LM 50 9 7.09 LM
*Only 27% of HSO & LSO of N is computed in IA or 127 learners
Prepared by:

CHERRY ANN A. SANTOS

Teacher III
Chairman, Filipino 10
Checked by:

JOSELITO S. MALAMANIG
Head Teacher III
Filipino Department

Noted:

TEODORA D. VITUG
School Principal IV
 N 32 52 51 47 53 0
Raw Score SP-ICT 10 10-RIZAL -BONIFACIO 10-GOMEZ 10-MABINI 0
43 --49 6 4 4 3 2
36 -- 42 11 16 22 21 21
29 -- 35 9 17 19 16 19
22 -- 28 4 14 5 5 7
15 -- 21 2 1 1 2 3
8 -- 14 1

27% 9 14 14 13 14 0
Item Analysis Most Learned
Item No. HSO (27%) LSO (27%) Total (54%) Score Item Rank
1 5 4 9 65 26 1
2 12 12 24 65 27 2
3 2 12 14 64 29 3
4 0 0 0 63 21 4
5 12 12 24 63 25 5
6 0 0 0 61 44 6
7 10 8 18 59 36 7
8 7 8 15 57 8 8
9 2 0 2 56 18 9
10 7 0 7 56 45 10
11 7 0 7 55 23
12 4 8 12 55 31
13 12 12 24 55 33
14 12 12 24 55 37
15 7 0 7 54 2
16 12 0 12 54 9
17 2 0 2 53 14
18 9 12 21 52 10
19 12 0 12 52 16
20 8 8 16 52 35
21 12 0 12 52 38
22 12 12 24 51 12
23 12 12 24 51 30
24 12 12 24 50 6
25 12 12 24 50 19
26 12 12 24 49 20
27 12 0 12 48 46
28 7 12 19 48 47
29 12 0 12 48 48
30 4 0 4 48 49
31 9 12 21 48 50
32 12 12 24 47 34
33 1 0 1 47 39
34 9 12 21 46 7
35 10 8 18 46 13
36 12 0 12 46 41
37 12 0 12 45 11
38 10 12 22 45 42
39 12 12 24 44 22
40 10 5 15 44 28
41 9 2 11 43 3
42 12 3 15 42 5
43 5 4 9 42 40
44 12 2 14 40 1
45 10 3 13 39 4
46 9 2 11 39 15
47 12 0 12 39 17
48 9 3 12 39 24
49 12 12 24 37 32
50 5 4 9 37 43
235 Over-All
Total Raw Score x f
19 43 --49 46 19
91 36 -- 42 39 91
80 29 -- 35 32 80
35 22 -- 28 25 35
9 15 -- 21 18 9
1 8 -- 14 11 1
Efx
127 27% HSO + 27% LSO
Least Learned Efx 8031 34.17
Score Item Rank N 235
10 46 1
10 47 2 Mn x 100 34.17
10 48 3 HPS 50
10 49 4
10 50 5 MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]
17 15 6 68.35 31.65 0.6330212766
18 24 7 68.98
18 43 8
19 42 9 SP-ICT 10
20 1 10 Raw Score x f
21 4 43 --49 46 6
22 17 36 -- 42 39 11
23 41 29 -- 35 32 9
24 5 22 -- 28 25 4
24 11 15 -- 21 18 2
24 23 8 -- 14 11 0
25 3 Efx
25 22
25 32 Efx 1129 35.28
27 13 N 32
28 2
28 6 Mn x 100 35.28
28 12 HPS 50
29 7
29 38 MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]
29 39 70.56 29.44 0.58875
30 10 71.15
30 19
31 8 10-RIZAL
31 28 Raw Score x f
31 34 43 --49 46 4
32 16 36 -- 42 39 16
32 40 29 -- 35 32 17
33 9 22 -- 28 25 14
33 20 15 -- 21 18 1
33 35 8 -- 14 11 0
34 36 Efx
35 30
35 33 Efx 1720 33.08
36 14 N 52
38 18
41 37 Mn x 100 33.08
41 44 HPS 50
42 45
45 31 MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]
48 29 66.15 33.85 0.6769230769
49 21 66.83
51 25
52 26 10-BONIFACIO
55 27 Raw Score x f
43 --49 46 4
36 -- 42 39 22
29 -- 35 32 19
22 -- 28 25 5
15 -- 21 18 1
8 -- 14 11 0
Efx

Efx 1793 35.16

N 51

Mn x 100 35.16
HPS 50

MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]

70.31 29.69 0.5937254902
70.91
 10-GOMEZ
xf Raw Score x f xf
874 43 --49 46 3 138
3549 36 -- 42 39 21 819
2560 29 -- 35 32 16 512
875 22 -- 28 25 5 125
162 15 -- 21 18 2 36
11 8 -- 14 11 0 0
8031 Efx 1630

Efx 1630 34.68

N 47

x 100 68.35 Mn x 100 34.68 x 100

HPS 50

MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]

69.36 30.64 0.612766
69.97

10-MABINI
xf Raw Score x f xf
276 43 --49 46 2 92
429 36 -- 42 39 21 819
288 29 -- 35 32 19 608
100 22 -- 28 25 7 175
36 15 -- 21 18 3 54
0 8 -- 14 11 1 11
1129 Efx 1759

Efx 1759 33.19

N 53

x 100 70.56 Mn x 100 33.19 x 100

HPS 50

MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]

66.38 33.62 0.6724528
67.05

0
xf Raw Score x f xf
184 43 --49 46 0 0
 624 36 -- 42 39 0 0
544 29 -- 35 32 0 0
350 22 -- 28 25 0 0
18 15 -- 21 18 0 0
0 8 -- 14 11 0 0
1720 Efx 0

Efx 0 #DIV/0!
N 0

x 100 66.15 Mn x 100 #DIV/0! x 100

HPS 50

MPL + [(100-MPL) x 0.02]

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

O
xf
184
858
608
125
18
0
1793

x 100 70.31
69.36

66.38
#DIV/0!