Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Yr. & Section: ___________ Instructor: Ms. Keisha Mae Vidamo Permit #: ____________
I. Rubrics for grading the Quarterly Exam for the subject Practical Research 2. (60 pts.)
NO LIMITED SOME AVERAGE HIGH
QUALITY →
PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCY EVIDENCE OF PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCY
SCORE
PROFICIENCY
CRITERIA ↓
5 8 10 12 15
Reader cannot Purpose are Purpose are
Thesis clarity Vague or
THESIS determine the fairly clear to clear, match
missing loosely related
CLARITY clarity task task
Organized Organized
Unclear
Some signs of sequence, but sequence of
Disorganized organization,
organization could be ideas is
ORGANIZATION confusing
improved effective
Substantial,
Some solid
Underdeveloped Offers support logical, &
No support for support,
support of ideas, of obvious concrete
ideas or details assumption not
SUPPORT off-topic, errors details support of all
all clear
ideas
Poor grammar Repeated
Weak grammar, Errors, that do
and usage, weaknesses in Essentially
usage, hard to not interfere
meaning mechanics and error free
CONVENTIONS understand with meaning
unclear usage
TOTAL SCORE
Name: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________
Yr. & Section: ___________ Instructor: Ms. Keisha Mae Vidamo Permit #: ____________
II. Rubric for grading the Quarterly Output Oral Defense for the subject Practical Research 2.
(100 pts.)