Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trial
0 grams 4 kg 6 kg 136 psi
No. 1
0% Abaca Trial
0 grams 4 kg 6 kg 135 psi
Waste Fiber No. 2
Trial
0 grams 4 kg 6 kg 138 psi
No. 3
Trial
5 grams 4 kg 6 kg 362 psi
No. 1
1% Abaca Trial
5 grams 4 kg 6 kg 275 psi
Waste Fiber No. 2
Trial
5 grams 4 kg 6 kg 210 psi
No. 3
Trial
10 grams 4 kg 6 kg 271 psi
No. 1
1.5% Abaca Trial
10 grams 4 kg 6 kg 303 psi
Waste Fiber No. 2
Trial
10 grams 4 kg 6 kg 310 psi
No. 3
Trial
15 grams 4 kg 6 kg 362 psi
No. 1
2% Abaca Trial
15 grams 4 kg 6 kg 355 psi
Waste Fiber No. 2
Trial
15 grams 4 kg 6 kg 349 psi
No. 3
Table 2. List of setups and its corresponding Compressive Strength based on the
Trial 1
400
362 362
350
300 271
250
200
150 136
100
50
0
0% Abaca Waste 1.0% Abaca Waste 1.5% Abaca Waste 2.0% Abaca Waste
For the first trial, the variations of compressive strength of the blocks with various
It is observed that the compressive strength of the concrete block with abaca
waste has increased greatly from the standard hollow blocks to the 1% abaca content and
has decreased at 1.5% but the 1% and 2% obtained the same results. The compressive
strength was observed to be 362 psi for 1% of abaca waste, 271 psi for 1.5% of abaca
waste and 362 psi for 2% of abaca waste. Therefore, the ideal percentages of abaca
wastes in this trial are the 1.0% and the 2.0% since they obtained the same results. For the
11
controlled concrete hollow block with no abaca waste, the compressive strength was
Based on the results obtained from the test, we could say that with the increase in
fiber content, the compressive strength results also increased but reduction of strength is
noticed, especially beyond the addition of 1.5% of abaca wastes and the mix becomes
maximum compressive strength was exhibited by the samples with 1% abaca waste fibers
and 2% abaca waste fibers which had the same result of 362 psi. The result was
inconsistent due to the lowering of the compressive strength in the 1.5% abaca waste
fibers added so the researchers should perform a second trial wherein they will test
Trial 2
400
355
350
303
300 275
250
200
150 135
100
50
0
0% Abaca Waste 1.0% Abaca Waste 1.5% Abaca Waste 2.0% Abaca Waste
For the second trial, the variations of compressive strength of the blocks with
It is observed that the compressive strength of the concrete block with abaca
waste has increased from the standard hollow blocks to the 1% abaca content and has
now continued increasing unlike the results in the first trial. The compressive strength
was observed as 275 psi for 1% of abaca waste, 303 psi for 1.5% of abaca waste and 355
psi for 2% of abaca waste. For the controlled concrete hollow block with no abaca waste,
Based on the new results obtained, the researchers could say that with the increase
in fiber content, the compressive strength results also increased and it is seen in the graph
of the results.
exhibited by the sample with 2% abaca waste fibers which had the result of 355 psi. The
researchers will perform a last trial to see if this increase in compressive strength is
Trial 3
400
349
350
310
300
250
210
200
150 138
100
50
0
0% Abaca Waste 1.0% Abaca Waste 1.5% Abaca Waste 2.0% Abaca Waste
For the third and last trial, the variations of compressive strength of the blocks
It is observed that the compressive strength of the concrete block with abaca
waste has increased from the standard hollow blocks to the 1% abaca content and has
now continued increasing just like the results in the second trial. The compressive
strength was observed as 210 psi for 1% of abaca waste, 310 psi for 1.5% of abaca waste
and 349 psi for 2% of abaca waste. For the controlled concrete hollow block with no
Based on the new results obtained, the researchers could say that with the increase
in fiber content, the compressive strength results also increased and it is seen in the graph
of the results.
exhibited by the sample with 2% abaca waste fibers which had the result of 349 psi. The
results therefore show that this increase in compressive strength is consistent and show