WELL TESTING :

PRINCIPLES & APPLICATION

Andry Halim
Resprod UTC
Pertamina Dit Hulu
Yogyakarta, 8 Desember 2017
Outline

1. Pendahuluan
2. Data yang diperlukan untuk analisa Well
Testing
3. Welltesting di sumur minyak
a) PBU
b) PDD
4. Welltesting di sumur gas
a) PBU
b) PDD
c) Uji Deliverability Gas Well
5. DST
1. Pendahuluan
 Outer
Well Reservoir Boundaries

Vertical Homogeneous Infinite

Horizontal Heterogeneous Rectangular
Storage Composite Circular
Constant Multilayer No-flow
Changing
Dual porosity Constant-
Completion (fissured) pressure
damaged
fractured
acldlzed

Start with simplest reservoir

Vertical well Infinitely

Nowellbore
storage
H Homogeneous ! Large

No damage
No stimulation
SIMPLIFIED RESERVOIR MODEL OIL/ WATER
• Compressibility is small and constant
• Homogeneous
• Isotropic • Viscosity is constant
Ignore Gravity • Laminar flow
• Constant Temperature
GAS
• Darcy's law applies
• Compressibility is NOT small and Is NOT constant.
• Single phase fluid Approximate correction Is PSEUDO-TIME
• Radial flow
Viscosity and z factor (compressibility
• Totally penetrating vertical well factor) are NOT constant . Exact
. Constant net pay, saturation correction use PSEUDO-PRESSURE [' p or m(p)]
. (()pf()r) - gr a d ient In reservoir- is small • Turbulent flow
• Constant wellbore storage
. Constant pressure throughout reservoir
at t i m e t = 0 IN-' <' t 'f..X' N - : J N . . X ' t
HOMOGENEOUS

• Constant production rate

• Closed circular reservoir
• Model complexities will be introduced
as necessary COMPOSITE
 Reservoir Simulation- " Forward" Problem Well Test Interpretation- The Inverse" Problem

q
Q
,:,' -- L_
,:'
- + - - - . . ,'i-'- -
- 1 - - - - - - - . ' i--- -

Known Input
Known Input

p ? I I

..
- + - - - - - - 11
I I

Known Output
Unknown OUtput
Prinsip Well Testing
 Prinsip Well Testing
Basic Fluid Flow Equation
 2. Data yang diperlukan
untuk analisa Well Testing
Data yang diperlukan untuk analisa Well Testing
Data yang diperlukan untuk analisa Well Testing
 Data yang diperlukan untuk analisa Well Testing

Fluid Compressibility Fluid Compressibility

- -----------
P < Pb ---
OIL WATER
c s - _!_dB1 + _ 1 _ 3, dR,.
" B., dp 1.000 B. dp ... "t .
•;..
1 dB.,. 1 dBV 1 B,
c" s----
B"
c · - -
y
- -+ - -
B, dp 1,000 B.. dp •• ':..:. i"-_
---- ..-.--
dp

+ Units: 1/psi, psi 1, sip, sip

.
+ Typtcat ranges:
GAS
9 Undersaturated 4 - 2 0 x1 0 pst 1
0 11 2 0 - 200x lQ'S pst 1
9 Saturated 011
9
9
Gas
Undersaturated
water
20x 1 0 - 1 0x1 0 l pst
1
2 - 3.3x 1 0 pst 1 -. - - - ----- - -
--
OIL WATER Viscosity cp

---
.. - - - - - - - - - - _ . , . . . . - ---!
+ Units: cp
+ Typical values:
Oil 0.3 - 5000 cp
9 Water 0.25 1.5 cp
Gas 0.010 - 0.045
Data yang diperlukan untuk analisa Well Testing
 Data yang diperlukan untuk analisa Well Testing

Cartesian Graph Semilog Graph

r- ----------------- zoo
180
--------------- --- •60
I

- i
& •zo
•40 I
I
I
I
I
180
a!
c
•oo
II
I
I
I
£"•I.l'l
I
r.--------------- 90%-------------+i 80
I
I
60

40
I

:.-
I
90%
-·1
I
I I
0 I I
0 100 I I
r..,..11r 20 I
I
I
I
I I
0
001 01 10
Tmt.hr

Log-Log Graph

1011110

- ...
1. 11
f ICII __
.
,.,-- 2x 2 1
0.3x

I ,,.,....--
...
10
3. Welltesting Di Sumur Minyak
 PBU
Pressure Build Up Test
(Uji Tekanan Bentuk)
 MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
of SHUT-IN

B
,r - -- - -

RESERVOIR

FLOW • VALVE A OPEN

BUILDUP • VALVE B CLOSED
- VALVE A CLOSED
- VALVE B OPEN

=•
- NO production at surface
Continuous production and inj ection at reservoi
• Must develop analy sis for buildup data.
• During buildup, the well is shut-In and has far • In semllog plot, plot s hut-In pressure
fewer operational problems. Still a few left - (Pws) In place of t.p. Use reverse log plot
see section on Data Validation and Wellbore for convenience .
Dynamics (phase redistribution, liquid
movement, gas bubbling through liquid ...). If flow rate preceding test was not co nstant
• Shut-In time, .6t, measured from end of flow. use superposition time function.
Buildup Is measurement of pressure and time
when well is shut-in . • Buildup Analysis treated as superposition of • Simplification by correcting flow time te = 24 x
flow and injection. cumulative productionflast flow rate.
Buildup must be preceded by flow period.
Simplified Analysis assumes constant flow
• P,- Pws = 162.6 qBjl/(kh)log[(t + .6t)/.6t) + 0 • For Fall-off test, q = -ve, otherwise analysis
identical to buildup.
rate fo r a duration t hours. Plot of Pws versus Horner ti me · log [(t + .6t)/.6t)
gives straight line of slope m. Buildup test does NOT allow for
skin calculation . Skin Is obtained from
Slope of semllog straight line same as FLOWING pressure before shut-ln.
drawdown- used to calculate permeability.
s = 1.151[Pws·Pwto +l o g t+.Ot - log k + 3.23]
Reverse semilog plot - convention m t.6t J.lCrw2
Extrapolation of straight line to infinite shut-In where Pws Is the pressure from tho semllog
time gives p•; At = 1. straight line at any .Ot
• Infinite acting reservoir, p" =p initial.
Finite reservoir p" Pi PR

Analysis procedure vory simila r

to DRAWDOWN Test Analysis
(Dosuperpositlon - Slider plot - analysis
identical to Drawdown).

In log-log plot replace .6p by (p shut-in - p

flowing) .
Single Rate
 Buildup as Superposition
(Pressure)
DESUPERPOSITION (SLIDER PLOT)

:- -
.
_ _
-----.
P1 · P • ml og( t+.!1t)+ -

t - - - -+
+ 4t

AP
- - - -- eitraJ,olated Omvdown

q- - - - - + - - - _ ._L\t
- 6t

P, • P • m log (t+4t)
t

• m Jog4 t
+0
p

--- - - - ...
 PRESSURE BUILDUP

pR - - - - - · ; · ·• • • • • • • • • • • • • • · · ·- · - - - - - - · - ·- - - -
-
W BUILD-UP SEMILOG PLOTS
:•E ·.
I= . INFINITE RESERVOIR
....
P.,. ;a ·.. LATETlME - + - - -- L\t

P ..,

At

DETECTION of BOUNDARY 1 . 10 100 1000

At = o o
.

P*
At - - +

P..

1000 100 10 1
increasing t
+--- t tt At = CX>

Doubling of slope only seen clearly

wheo t » 16 t,..
 .
/ . .......•.•.....l.i.&J
. ...... ...t-·••11.).
• u• . . .,. ,,.e,. ..
· . . . ... w....
........,<-

.,
... .,,.
-.o··•·•,•·J
1M . .,. .....
• ""...,C.M•••o••_•.
,. ,
..
.. e....o
... . .J - et .
..•rot•
.
,.,.._ • ..,...., u
·- . . .. .....o -

/ ·/
-

. ·-·
'
...(••.,II•:J
..,...,...
• • _,._. .Of ....... ....-..-....·....,..,.t,....l• ' -
··/ i / •.. / ;r
.
...fr·••ll•;:} G..." . J. ...e-... 11. .

_
lit • • •ve-u • ttH'II\Itt• u ..,_..._._. t etC-1 ••
. . ..,.,.,
• • t "'
f( u
t . . ..-u
. . .. ,

t ltAMPlE IUI\OUP CUf<Vf5

..
Analisa PBU
Analisa PBU sumur Porositas Tunggal
Analisa PBU sumur Porositas Tunggal
Langkah Kerja
Langkah Kerja
Langkah Kerja
Langkah Kerja
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
 Contoh soal
FOR\ t:LIR UJ I Bl-1LD ·p (PBU)

AMA PERUSAHAA'.1 ANALISAPBU

LAPA.'lGAN
LAPI
FOR.t'vi.J\SI YA.?\G DI UJI XXXX YYYY . GAKECA
TANGGALPE!\GUJIAN T G LB LN T H : \
DATA P E D liK G TUK
ANALISA FASAFLUIDA
INTERVAL PERFORA SI TE RBliKA
KEDALA.'\iA U l \ l U K RESERVOIR (mbp)
JARI-JARI SUMUR. r,. (ft) 0 .25 f r
JARI-JARI PE-JGURASA K r# (ft) 745
TEBAL FOR.\1A SI, h ( fr) 20.0
POROSITA S. ,P(fraksi) 0.15
PRODUKSI KUMULATIF minyak 4 167 STB
g as S C F

a tr
STB

LAJU PRODUKS I M L ' N AK STABIL ( q0 ) minyak 50.0 STBih

PG
M
"'"
%
KA minyak 50.0 STBib
VISKOSITAS . Jl (cp) 1.25
FAKTOR VOUJYIE FORMASI. Bo (bbVstb) minyak 1.98 X 10' 5
KOMPRESIBILIT AS. (' (psi'1
)
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Latihan soal

depth = 10476 ft
rw = 0,35416667 ft
ct = 0,0000226 psi-1
qo = 4900 STB/D
h= 482ft
Pwf 2761 psig
(dt=0) =
uo = 0,2cp
phi = 0,09
Bo = 1,55RB/STB
ID Casing 0,523 ft
=
tp = 310hrs
 Latihan soal
m= 40psi/cycle P-rata2 = 3355 psi
3.400
P-1 hr 3266 psi
=
3.350
k= (162.6 *qo * Uo * Bo) / (m * h)
3.300
12,811

3.250 S= 1,153*(p-1hr-Pwf@dt=0)/m+log(tp+1)/tp-log
(k/(phi*uo*Ct*rw^2)+3,2275

3.200
8,6285

3.150 dPs = (141,2*qo*Uo*Bo*S)/(

k*h)

Series1 3.100 dPs = 299,72

FE = (P-Pwf-dPs)/(P-Pwf)
3.050
FE = 49,5%
3.000
10000 1000 100 10 1
 Fron1--end fffccu Sonilog straight liM
SMns. afterjlow.froctwes llfjlnlJ -cCJing rv.urvoir 8o11ndary effects

"'"ypx.urvc nwtthi"S Homer and MDH n tbodl1

Type c s clllltbtt h l l MDII \lfeS lot time, and
charx lcf
and cun•c match may be diffic:u lr
Homer w a los(r+&)/6t) .,.,....---
/
nccpc eo wleec s t r a line fet /
MDH u d tlomer £nd of the scmatos waasi111Joe .f" Pressure increase
t • 3 7 9 2 c,I A ( t o . . > . . - J

t
ftorn omtt lnjecriol\
'--- - - - - - - ' --- ------;--+
---..
:-::
.....
/ '•
P r ckdlllt
from of&d production

Well bore $ lO r a (WBS) du1111100$ for lest

desia:n is:
For bui ldup tC$t:
Ncg;a. hoe skln t.., =! 70,000...c I All ee,w.
lat cWBS

The prior Oow pcnod should reaeh semisteady.

st3tc flow for MDII . WBS IS well bore storage
after flow. A positive skin n:prcscnts well bore
shrinbge while a fraetwe e n be oonsickred as
weU c:nlarsement
Posnh-e slctn.. small wos

Log {sbut-in, llltinle)

Figure 6-2. Idealized pressure buildup characteristics for a gas well (after
Miller et a/.).2 PERTAMINA
PDD
Analisa PDD
Analisa PDD
Analisa PDD
Analisa PDD
Analisa PDD
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
4. Welltesting Di Sumur Gas
Pressure Build up
Build up gas
well test
Contoh soal
Pressure Draw Down
Persamaan Aliran gas dalam media berpori
Drawdown gas
well test
Contoh soal
Gas WellTesting
Gas Well testing
Pseudopressure
Pseudopressure
Pseudotime
Pseudoskin
Typical Gas Test
Pseudoskin
Absolute Open Flow Potential
Absolute Open Flow Potential
Uji Deliverability Gas Well
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Uji Deliverability Sumur Gas
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Contoh soal
Isochronal dan MIT
5. DST
 BOR S U M UR S PI 1. P E M B O R A N

_ TO
l _

2.
E V A LU A S I

------------------------------- ----- -----------------------------------------,

P E N Y IA P A N SU M U R

3.
KOMPLESI

T E ST IN G

c >
:-------------------------------------
4. PROOUK

-
SI

. - .....AMINA
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
a. How Wells Are Completed
• Evaluate Formation
• Isolate the Formation
• Stimulate Well
• Install Production Equipment
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
a. How Wells Are Completed
 1. PENGERTIAN
DRILL STEM TEST

b. Logging and Testing

Figure shown represents the first

well logging record by Henri Doll
in 1927
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing

Schlumberger Logging Trucks in the past

 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing

Types of boreholes

• According to Casing operation

- Cased holes
- Open holes
• According to conductivity of the borehole
- Conductive (water base drilling mud)
- Non-conductive boreholes (oil base mud, air drilled or
cased holes)
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing
Cased holes Open holes
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing

Types of well logs and Testing

Wireline logs
(Electrical, Radioactive, Acoustic, mechanical,
Thermal and Magnetic logs)

Formation Testers
(Repeated Formation Tester/MDT, Drill Stem
Tests)
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing
Well logs- the necessity
• These measurements are necessary because geological
sampling during drilling (cutting sampling) leaves a
very imprecise record of the formations encountered.
• Entire formation samples can be brought to the surface
by mechanical coring, but this is both slow and
expensive.
• The results of coring, of course, are unequivocal.
Logging is precise, but equivocal, in that it needs
interpretation to bring a log to the level of geological or
petrophysical experience.
• However, logs fill the gap between ‘cuttings’ and cores,
with experience, calibration and computers, they can
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing

Some Logging Companies

• Schlumberger
• Gearhart
• Dresser Atlas
• Welex
• Haliburton
• Others
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing
Objectives of wire line logging

1 Lithology identification
2 Determination of reservoir characteristics (e.g. porosity, saturation,
permeability).
3 Discrimination between source and non source rocks
4 Identification the fluid type in the pore space of reservoir rock (
gas, oil, water)
5 Identification of productive zones.
6Determination the depth and thickness of productive zones.
7-Locating reservoir fluid contacts.
8 Well to well correlation for determining the lateral extension
of subsurface geologic cross sections.
9 Determination formation dip and hole angle and size.
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing

Principal uses of
open hole wireline
logs
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing
Practical Well Testing
Tests on oil and gas wells are performed at various stages of drilling, completion and
production.The test objectives at each stage range from simple identification of produced
fluids and determination of reservoir deliverability to the characterisation of complex
reservoir features. Most well tests can be grouped either as productivity testing or as
descriptive/reservoir testing.
Productivity well tests are conducted to;
•Identify produced fluids and determine their respective volume ratios
• Measure reservoir pressure and temperature.
• Obtain samples suitable for PVT analysis.
• Determine well deliverability.
• Evaluate completion efficiency.
• Characterise well damage.
•Evaluate workover or stimulation treatment.
Descriptive tests seek to;
• Evaluate reservoir parameters.
• Characterise reservoir heterogenities.
• Assess reservoir extent and geometry.
• Determine hydraulic communication between wells.
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
b. Logging and Testing

Contoh Well Testing

 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
c. Drill Stem Test (DST)

• A kind of temporary, partial completion of the well

that provides data on several feet or several hundred
feet of producing formation
• The main goal of drill stem testing is the gathering of
pressure and production data.
• Based on data gathered from the DST, management
can base a decision to complete the hole for potential
production of oil or gas or proceed with abandonment
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
c. Drill Stem Test (DST)

Michael Golan; Curtis H.W.,”Well Performance”. Norwegian University of Science

and technology (NTNU),-,-,-
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
c. Drill Stem Test (DST)

Drill-stem testing provides a method of temporarily completing a well to

determine the productive characteristics of a specific zone.
As originally conceived, a drill-stem test provided primarily an indication of
:
1. formation content.
2. The pressure chart was available, but served mainly to evaluate tool
operation.
3. Currently, analysis of pressure data in a properly planned and executed
DST can provide, at reasonable cost, good data to help evaluate :
a. the productivity of the zone,
b. the completion practices,
c. the extent of formation damage and perhaps the need for
stimulation.
A drill-stem test provides an estimate of formation properties and wellbore
damage. These data maybe used to determine the well's flow potential
with a regular completion that uses stimulation techniques to remove
damage and increase effective well-bore size.
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
c. Drill Stem Test (DST)
Sometimes known as a DST, a drill stem test is a type of structured evaluation
that makes it possible to determine the makeup of the geologic formation or
reservoir that is found adjacent to the drill pipe inserted into the ground during
the extraction of natural gas or oil.
In many cases, this type of test can help determine :
1. if drilling in the area is likely to produce the desired results, or
2. if seeking another site would be more fruitful.
It is also possible to use a drill stem test to determine if a site is suitable for
digging for water as well as oil or natural gas.
First developed in the latter part of the 1920s, the actual equipment used in a
drill stem test has evolved over time.
Earlier methods involved using :
1. a small charge to create a perforation in a plastic casing that was lowered
through the drill stem.
2. When the charge was ignited, this created a small perforation in the casing
that made it possible to collect samples of the surrounding fluids or earth.
3. The sample was then retrieved and examined.
In more recent years, the drill stem test has used technology that makes it
possible to run small robots through the drill stem, collect a sample, and
provide immediate feedback on the composition of the sample.
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
c. Drill Stem Test (DST)

The results of a drill stem test make it possible to determine :

1. which sites are likely to yield enough product to make the digging
commercially viable.
2. By examining the sample collected from the test, it is possible to
calculate the concentration of natural gas or oil that can reasonably be
extracted. Should the results of the test indicate that the amount of
product available falls below a certain range, the site is abandoned and
other areas tested.
This same general principal holds true when using a drill stem test to look
for water. Should the sample not indicate the presence of an equitable
amount of water within a certain distance from the surface, the site is
abandoned in favor of another one that is likely to provide a more ample
supply of water.
Depending on the type of equipment used to conduct the drill stem test, the
process may take as long as 24 hours before the results are considered
final.
This is especially true when there is a need to also take readings that
indicate the level of pressure at the site along with the availability of the
product desired for extraction and eventual sale. Since tests of this type do
often involve working with volatile materials, safety precautions that help to
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
c. Drill Stem Test (DST)

Drill-stem testing provides a method of temporarily completing a well to

determine :
1. the productive characteristics of a specific zone. As originally conceived,
a drill-stem test provided primarily an indication of formation content.
2. The pressure chart was available, but served mainly to evaluate tool
operation.
3. Currently, analysis of pressure data in a properly planned and executed
DST can provide, at reasonable cost, good data to help evaluate :
• the productivity of the zone,
• the completion practices,
• the extent of formation damage and perhaps the need for
stimulation.
A drill-stem test provides an estimate of formation properties and wellbore
damage. These data may be used to determine the well's flo w potential
with a regular completion that uses stimulation techniques to remove
damage and increase effective wellbore size.
 1. PENGERTIAN DRILL STEM TEST
d. Drilling activity up to produced
4 Typical DST Periods

• Pre-flow or Initial flow

• Initial Shut-in
• Main Flow
• Final Shut-in
 3. JENIS-JENIS TEKNIK UJI SUMUR/ DST

b. Typical DST Testing

The typical drill stem test will be split into four period :
1. Pre flow :
2. initial shut in period,
3. a main flow period and
4. a final shut in period.
Times of for each test are dependent on conditions at the well site
Drill stem tests may be run at any time during :

1. the drilling operation at the current depth or

2. may be used to test any interval in the hole after TD has been reached.
Using these data and based on the evaluation of engineers and geologists,
management can base a decision to complete the hole for potential production of
oil or gas or proceed with abandonment.
Pre-Flow Period

• is a production period to clean up the well and is used

to remove any supercharge given to the formation due
to mud infiltrating into the prospective formation during
the drilling operation.

22.3-107
Initial Shut In

• This period is to allow the formation to recover from

pressure surges caused during the pre flow. this is
often referred to as "closed in for the pressure build
up" this period will be longer.

22.3-108
Main Flow

• a more lengthy production period designed to test

the formations flow characteristics more rigorously.
• Samples of any fluids will be checked for water
content Gas bubble bust pressure temperature and
many other nice surprises. This will be done using
set choke or variable chokes.
• Sample reaching surface will be measured as to
volume and gathered for analysis in a laboratory.
• Samples of any fluids in the drill string at the
conclusion of the test will be measured as to volume
and gathered for analysis.
• Flowing pressures and temperatures will be
recorded.
22.3-109
 Final Shut-In

• formation pressure is recorded over this period. The

shape of the pressure build up curve will tell us the
permeability of the formation, the degree of formation
damage (likely caused during the drilling operation),
• It will also tell us if we have found a small reservoir
but there is no telling if it a big one.
4. PERALATAN DST
 4. PERALATAN DST

The DST tool is an arrangement of packers and valves placed at the

endof the drill pipe. The packers help in isolating the zone of interest
fromdrilling mud in the hole and to let it produce into the test chamber,
drillcollar, and drill pipe. The packers also help in reducing wellbore
storageeffects. Figure 1 shows a diagram of operational DST tool and
sequenceof operations for MFE tool.

Fig 1
 4. PERALATAN DST

DST Tools: Types

• 2 basic types, which may be used for open or cased
holes:
– Single-packer DST tool
• Used to isolate formations from below the tool to the
bottom of the hole. Perforated pipe is made up below the
packer
– Straddle-packer or 2-packer DST tool
• Isolates the formation bed or beds between two packers
4. PERALATAN DST
2-Packer DST Assembly

• 2 inflatable packers to
isolate the zone to be
tested
 4. PERALATAN DST

DST assembly using two

straddle packers
4. PERALATAN DST

ELECTRIC WIRELINE
FORMATION TESTER
4. PERALATAN DST
4. PERALATAN DST
Multicycle tester valve

22.3-118
4. PERALATAN DST

22.3-119
4. PERALATAN DST

22.3-120
Test Tree and Test Choke

• A combination of valves made

on top of the DST string that
will divert fm fluids to the
choke and onto the
separator/s.
Test Tree

22.3-122
Test Choke

22.3-123
TERIMA KASIH
PERTANYAAN ?
Daftar Pustaka
• Louis Mattar, “WellTest Interpreatation”, bahan kursus
• Schlumberger,”Fundamentals of Formation Testing”
• Chaudhri, A. U,”Oil Well Testing Handbook”
• Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M.F.: Applied Petroleum Reservoir
Engineering, 2nd Ed.,Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
• ERCB : “Theory and Practice of the Testing of Gas Wells”, Third
Edition, 1975.
• Ikoku, Chi. U : “Natural Gas Reservoir Engineering”, John Willey &
Sons, 1984.
• Schlumberger,” Introduction toWell Testing”, Bath, EnglandMarch
1998
• Pertamina,”Teknik Reservoir”, Manajemen Produksi Hulu , Jakarta,
2 Juli 2003
• Dake, L.P.: Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering, Elsevier Science
Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978.
• Slider, “Practical Petroleum Reservoir Engineering Methods”, 2nd Ed,
Gulf Publishing
• Semua buku perihal Well Testing
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran
Lampiran