10/27/2019 Mail - Bertrand, Shamaine - Outlook

Thank you for being on the NAME Proposal Review Committee for #2019NAME Conference Proposals.

All proposal review and scoring must be completed no later than April 10, 11:59pm ET,

We encourage you to start reviewing as soon as you are assigned proposals.

Please volunteer only if you know that you will be available to review during the time indicated above.
Please read ALL instructions, including “Reviewer Special Instructions” and rubric, below
All reviewers who complete all their reviewing assignments will be listed in the print and digital NAME Conference
program book.

Instructions for Accessing and Reviewing Proposals

You must be a member of NAME to access the system.

Please got to the NAME website: http://www.NAMEorg.org
When on the NAME website, input your NAME membership username and password.
Scroll to the bottom of the Members Area Features and locate Proposal Submissions.
Here you will see the topic to which you have been assigned to review.
If there are any proposals for review, you will see a number below your assigned topic, indicating the number of proposals
in your Inbox.
Click on the link in your proposal/topic area to go to your inbox for that topic.
Click on a proposal name in the inbox.
The first time you enter to review proposals, you will be presented with the scoring rubric. Read this carefully.
Enter your initials and click Continue to indicate you understand.
You will see the title of the proposal, abstract, and proposal details on the next page.
Read and review the proposal.
Below the gray box containing the proposal details, you will find a series of drop-down score menus and comment fields.
Include feedback in the comment box on the proposal scoring page and provide a score for each drop-down.
After you have completed scoring a proposal, click on Continue at the bottom of the page. You will see that the proposal
has moved from the Inbox to the Outbox.
Repeat steps 6-15 until all assigned proposals, in all assigned topics, have been reviewed.
You have completed your review once all proposals have moved to your Outbox for each assigned topic.

These detailed instructions can also be found through a link on the top-right of the next page, the rubric are also on the NAME
website.

Review the rubric, below or go to the NAME website and scroll to the bottom of the page if you want to study or refer to
the rubric at any point

NAME webpage with review instructions and rubric: https://www.nameorg.org/name_2018_cfp.php

Proposal Evaluation Rubric

The possible score range for individual criteria is 1-5 with 5 being the highest.
The highest possible total combined score for a proposal is 20.

Criteria Present, but weak Average Extremely Strong

https://outlook.office.com/mail/search/id/AAQkADA2YzE4MTljLTUzZjktNDg1OS04NmJhLWMzN2MyNDdiNDY2ZQAQAAfDiWSkf1lEt8KD1RQk9vI%3D 1/2
10/27/2019 Mail - Bertrand, Shamaine - Outlook

(1-2) (3) (4-5)

Conference No ties to theme even Has some ties to theme; for example, in Clearly addresses conference theme. Overall
Theme if rhetoric says these content and/or outcomes. proposal is clear as to its relation to both.
are tied in.

Significance Issues raised are not Reinforces, but does not add to, current Clear information. Rationale is based on
of Content significant.? Does not research, knowledge, or practice bases in the current research, knowledge, and/or practice
add to or reinforce field.? May shed new light on multicultural (praxis) in the field, and adds to one or more of
existing work in issues through the perspective(s) it takes. these foundations. Timely. In-depth.
multicultural
education.

Audience No attention to
Interaction presenter-audience
& Process of interaction. Process is
Presentation not clear or is
incompatible with
time frame.
Some interaction between audience and Highly interactive pedagogy or presenter-
presenters will take place. Some attention to audience interaction is described. Materials
designing a well-timed and interesting described are relevant and innovative. Time
presentation is evident. frame of presentation is explained.

Organizing Proposal does not Proposal description does not match Proposal makes its content level explicit and
Level, really address organizing level, or proposal is too general explains why various groups of attendees with
Audience & organizing or too specific to make an accurate that level of knowledge in the field would be
Participant level/audience. Little assessment. Describes desired participant interested. Provides an explicit statement of
Outcomes or no attention is outcomes, but it is not altogether clear how participant outcomes and how they will be
given to participant they will be achieved. achieved.
outcomes.

https://outlook.office.com/mail/search/id/AAQkADA2YzE4MTljLTUzZjktNDg1OS04NmJhLWMzN2MyNDdiNDY2ZQAQAAfDiWSkf1lEt8KD1RQk9vI%3D 2/2