Professional Documents
Culture Documents
196 731 1 PB PDF
196 731 1 PB PDF
Abstract
The article presents a dynamic analysis of the compressed air energy storage in the car. The analysis was used
to determine those processes most relevant to achieving highest possible efficiency. A review of the state of
the art is presented. Simple technical-economic analysis of usage those kind of cars is also performed and
discussed by taking Polish local conditions from an electricity market. Main advantages as well as drawback
of the compressed air cars are pointed out
Keywords: Dynamic, Compressed Air Energy Storage, Vehicles
Figure 1: Armando Regusci’s car, which managed 100 km on Figure 2: Compressed air bike built in 1997. (source: [2])
one tank (source: [2])
For the tank, assuming ideal mixing in the interior 2.5. The equations describing the flow resistance of
and single component feed, equation (6) is as fol- the valves
lows: The mass flow of working medium through the
valve can be described in the simplest way by the
d (ρo V)
= Fi ρi − Fo ρo (7) following formula:
dt
where: Fi – the flowrate of the medium entering
ṁ = k ∆p
p
(12)
the tank, ρi – the density of the medium entering the
tank, Fo – the flowrate of the medium exiting the where: ṁ – mass flow, k – coefficient representing
tank, ρo – the density of the medium exiting the tank, the inverse of flow resistance (conductivity), ∆p –
V – the volume of the medium in the tank. pressure drop across the valve.
The basic equation defining the characteristics of
2.3. Volume balance the valves takes into account the coefficient Cv and
Devices that store a quantity of a substance at a pressure drop across the valve as a result of flow re-
constant volume (e.g. vessel) are described by the sistance:
following equation:
ṁ = f (Cv, p1 , p2 ) (13)
V = const = f (ṁ, h, p, T ) (8) where: ṁ – mass flow, Cv – coefficient represent-
ing the inverse of flow resistance (conductivity), p1 –
dV
=0 (9) inlet pressure, p2 – outlet pressure.
dt
where: V – volume of the vessel , t – time, – mass 2.6. Heat balance
flow, h – holdup, p – vessel pressure, T – vessel tem- The relationship describing heat exchange in a
perature. cooler:
The volume balance for the vessel can be repre-
sented as follows: d (V Hout )
F (Hin − Hout ) − Qcooler = (14)
dt
Vol. change due to pressure + (10) The relationship describing heat exchange in a
Vol. change due to f lows + heater:
Vol. change due to temperature +
Vol. change due to other f actors = 0 F (Hin − Hout ) + Qheater =
d (V Hout )
(15)
dt
2.4. Energy balance
The most general form of energy equation is de- where: F – flow of working medium, H – enthalpy
scribed in the following equation: of the working medium, Qcooler – cooler duty, Qheater
– heater duty, V – volume of the substance in the tube
or shell.
Rate o f accumulation o f total en. = (11)
Flow o f total en. into system − 2.7. Flow resistance across cooler / heater
Flow o f total en. out o f system + Equation (16) determining the flow through the
cooler / heater is similar to the relationship for flow
Heat added to sys. cross its bound. +
through valves (12).
Heat generated by reaction −
√ √
Work done by sys. on surroundings ṁ = ρ · k p1 − p2 (16)
The stream of energy flowing into, or leaving the where: ṁ – mass flow of working medium, ρ –
system is the result of convection or conduction. density of the working medium, p1 – inlet pressure,
However, heat is supplied to the system by conduc- p2 – outlet pressure, k – coefficient representing the
tion or radiation. inverse of flow resistance (conductivity).
— 28 —
Journal of Power Technologies 91 (1) (2011) 23–36
2.8. The equation for compressor and expanders where: F1 – molar flow rate at the inlet, h2 – en-
thalpy of the working medium at the outlet, h1 – en-
Both the polytropic and isentropic power of a com-
thalpy of the working medium at the inlet, MW –
pressor or expander can be calculated using equation
molecular weight of the working medium.
(17).
Power taken from the working medium in the ex-
pander was expressed by the following relationship:
n
N = F1 (MW) CF (17)
n−1 N1−2 = F1 (MW) (h1 − h2 ) (22)
p1 p2 ( n )
! ! n−1
· − 1 2.8.1. The equations describing the inertia of the ro-
p2 p1
tating equipment
where: n – the volume exponent, CF – correction Rotational inertia:
factor, p1 – inlet pressure, p2 – outlet pressure, ρ1
– inlet density of the working medium, F1 – molar I = M R2 (23)
flow rate at the inlet, MW – molecular weight of the where: M – the rotating mass, R – the radius of
working medium. gyration.
With isentropic power, the volume exponent The power needed to change the rotation speed:
should be calculated by relation (18), while poly-
tropic power requires the volume exponent described dω
by equation (19). NI = I |ω| (24)
dt
p
2
where: ω – the rotation speed.
ln p1
n= ρ0 (18)
ln ρ1
2 2.8.2. Friction loss
Power loss due to friction:
where: ρ’2 – density of the working medium at the
outlet for the isentropic process.
N f = f f ric ω |ω| (25)
p
2
ln p1
where: f f ric – frictional power loss factor.
n= ρ (19)
2
ln ρ1 2.8.3. Duty
where: ρ2 – density of the working medium at the Compressor power:
outlet.
The correction factor is expressed by the following
equation: NC = F1 (MW) (h2 − h1 ) (26)
dω
h02 − h1 +I |ω|
CF = (20) dt
+ f f ric ω |ω|
n p2 p1
n−1 ρ0
− ρ1
2
2.8.4. Polytropic and isentropic efficiency • maximum pressure in the tank: 350 bar (as in
Compressor efficiency: AIRONE’s MDI [13])
Nto system • initial temperature of the air in the tank for all
η= (28) cases of expansion has been leveled at 19◦ C
F1 (MW) (h2 − h1 )
Expander efficiency: • fixed compressor adiabatic efficiency of 80%
F1 (MW) (h2 − h1 ) • fixed turbine adiabatic efficiency of 80%
η= (29)
N f rom system
• adiabatic compression and expansion processes
To obtain isentropic efficiency (in HYSYS called
adiabatic efficiency) isentropic power from the for- • power of the motor which drives the compres-
mula (17) should be substituted into equations (28) sor: 5.5 kW
and (29). However, polytropic power should be sub-
• electric efficiency of the motor which drives
stituted in the case of polytropic efficiency for the
the compressor: 85% (single-phase motor SBg
same equations.
213T-2 described in [10])
V
TANK Temperature
100
80
C
t [oC]
60
cooling 20
0
Mass of the air
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
ps=1.1bar 10 bar 20 bar 30 bar time [min]
70
40 bar 60 bar 80 bar 100 bar
60
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
time [min]
Figure 10: Mass of air in the tank during loading with com-
pressed air, including cooling
Energy consumption
mechanical en electrical en
4. Discussion 33
31
29
As a result of compression including cooling 27
(Fig. 9) in all cases about 59 kg of air has been
[kWh]
25
pumped into the tank (Fig. 10) due to the assumed 23
21
final temperature of the process – 99◦ C (Fig. 11). 19
The resulting electricity consumption (Fig. 12) 17
3
RV
2.5
Eu [kWh]
TANK
1.5
V
1
0.5
0
T 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
pf [bar]
stages). -70
-80
The process of compression is not adiabatic, more-
-90
over – the compressor cylinder is fanned and in-
[oC]
-100
tensely cooled so that the energy needed to compress
-110
the gas is lower.
-120
This process is slow (several hours) and the dif-
-130
ference in temperature between the compressed gas 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
and the environment is very high, so despite the small pf [bar]
area of heat transfer inside the cylinder the difference
in electricity consumption should be significant.
Figure 15: Influence of final pressure in the tank at the outlet
For point 1 the work of compression is the greatest
temperature for a simple tank discharging through a turbine op-
possible because the cooling is done only after the erating at constant pressure for t s = 99◦ C
compressor.
To bring this process closer to a real case scenario,
compression should be modeled using several com- in the range of −66◦ C (for p f = 10 bar) to −122.5◦ C
pressors in a series with cooling for each of them. (for p f = 60 bar) and hence potentially dangerous,
For the process of discharging the tank with a tur- so in this case the air leaving the engine should be
bine operating at constant ∆p (Fig. 13) 6 cases were mixed with ambient air before release to the environ-
considered – from p f = 10 bar (p f = ∆p + 1 bar) to ment.
p f = 60 bar. The efficiency of the process increases with the fi-
Energy from the discharge (Fig. 14) ranged from nal pressure despite a decrease in the discharge of
2.085 kWh (for p f = 10 bar) to 2.514 kWh (for p f = energy from above ∆pT = 39 bar. This is due to
40 bar). decreasing electricity consumption for air pressure
Maximum occurring in this case, it follows that for from the higher pressure.
large pressure drops in a turbine we obtain a higher The maximum obtained in the calculation of gross
enthalpy drop, but there is a larger quantity of air efficiency and electrical efficiency reached 10% and
in the tank which is not expanded (the assumption 8.9% (for p f = 50 bar) (Fig. 16).
∆pT = const). Noteworthy is the fact that the power on the tur-
Temperatures on exiting the system (Fig. 15) are bine shaft (example in Figure 17) decreases as the
— 32 —
Journal of Power Technologies 91 (1) (2011) 23–36
Efficiency
gross efficiency electrical efficiency
12
RV
10
TANK HE
8
V
[%]
2
T1 T2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
pf [bar] Figure 18: The process of discharging the tank using atmo-
spheric heating of the working medium between two turbines
operating at constant pressures
Figure 16: Effect of final pressure (∆pT + 1 bar) on efficiency
of a simple discharge of the tank for t s = 99◦ C
valve opening time.
Power
As in the case of the charging process, discharging
pf=10 bar 20 bar 30 bar is not adiabatic and occurs in a piston engine. That
16 40 bar 50 bar 60 bar engine block is heated by ambient air, but in the case
14 of expansion the temperature difference between the
12 gas and the surrounding is less than during compres-
10 sion (the gas is cooled before it goes to the tank and
N [kW]
3.5 -40
3 -50
2.5 -60
Eu [kWh]
2 -70
[oC]
1.5 -80
1 -90
0.5 -100
0 -110
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
pf [bar] pf [bar]
Figure 19: Effect of final pressure (∆pT1 +∆pT2 + 1 bar) for en- Figure 20: Influence of final pressure in the tank at the outlet
ergy derived from discharging the tank using atmospheric heat- temperature for discharging the tank using atmospheric heat-
ing of the working medium between two turbines operating at ing of the working medium between two turbines operating at
constant pressures for t s = 99◦ C constant pressures for t s = 99◦ C
Efficiency
(for p f = 100 bar). gross efficiency electrical efficiency
As in the case of a simple discharge process the 14
8
previously accepted assumptions.)
[%]
4
ficiency (Fig. 21) are 12% and 10% (given to com-
pare with the previous case) and, for p f = 100 bar –
2
0
12.37 % and 11%. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Both the energy of the discharge, the efficiency pf [bar]
of this process as well as the air temperature at the
outlet for discharge using atmospheric heating of the
Figure 21: Effect of final pressure (∆pT1 +∆pT2 + 1 bar) for effi-
working medium are greater than in the case of sim- ciency of discharging the tank using atmospheric heating of the
ple discharge. working medium between two turbines operating at constant
For the process of discharging the tank by using pressures for t s = 99◦ C
two turbines in turn (Fig. 22) only one example was
considered – ∆pT1 = 99 bar and ∆pT2 = 19 bar (p f =
20 bar).
RV1
The energy obtained from discharge was
2.863 kWh, which is a much better result than
in point 2, although in the example there is no T1
heating of the air. TANK
The medium temperature leaving the system in the V
RV2
first part of the discharge was −134◦ C, while the sec-
ond rises to −91◦ C.
Gross efficiency of the process was 11% and elec- T2
trical efficiency 9.6%, which shows the superiority of
this variant compared to simple discharge. Figure 22: The process of discharging the tank by using two
The better results are due to bigger enthalpy drops turbines in turn
— 34 —
Journal of Power Technologies 91 (1) (2011) 23–36