INTRODUCTION

TO URBAN PLANNING G-3

GROUP MEMBERS
1. BAYOU KAMAW
2. MARKOS TARIKU
3. YORDANOS GEDEBIE
4. GOYTOM TEKESTE
5. TEKLEAB MEZLEKIA
6. ABREHAM ADUGNA

SUBMITTED TO INST
BABAR JAVID AND
FINAL PRESENTATION NOHAMIT AKLOG
 VISION FORMULATION

THE GENERAL PROPHECY OF THIS PROPOSAL IS TO REDESIGN THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH
THE HERITAGES AND THE OLDNESS OF THE CITY, AND ALSO TO MAKE THE NEIGHBORHOOD :-
• SUSTAINABLE,
• MORE ATTRACTIVE,
• COMFORTABLE AND
• VERY SAFE TO LIVE.

PART 5
 GUIDING PLANNING
PRINCIPLE
The following principles are applied in the preparation of this proposal:

1. MIXED USE AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION TO PROMOTE VIABILITY OF PLANS.

• our site consists of commerce, business, administration, services, recreation, and transport functions.
• To increase social interaction.
• To make the urban areas active.
• To creates cross-subsidy and better resource distribution

2.STRONG AND INTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT:

• By providing improved streets, parking, open spaces and
• By maintaining all multi-story developments and renewing others.

3.WALKABLE AND COMFORTABLE MODERN CITY CENTER:

• By widening streets,
• By providing walkways and street lights
• By providing open spaces and squares.

PART 5
 GUIDING PLANNING
PRINCIPLE

4.PRESERVE THE HERITAGES;

• our site consists very old and historical heritages and churches. So we conserve this valuable UNESCO sites.

5.CREATE STRONG SENSE OF NEIGHBORHOOD

• Providing communal spaces

6 MIXED INCOME DEVELOPMENT:

• By improving the living condition of low-income residents.
• By allowing owners of private plots to improve their houses step by step.

7 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE DEVELOPMENT PLANS

• consideration of plan implementation capacity
• less complex plans without compromising long-term benefits

PART 5
 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

Gondar is a center of cultural and religuous building

and site ,they are also historical .most of them are a
world heritage and they are still a wondar for the oth-
er world

INSPIRATION

AROUND OUR SITE THER IS ONE OF WONDAR WORLD HERITAGE

,CALLED FASILE GINB
CONCEPT DEFINITION
CONCEPT
therefore we want to preserve and create a continious view or cre-
“INTEGRATING WITH THE CASTLE” ating continity between the imperial compound and oure site.

PART 5
 CONCEPT MAP
PRIVATE BUILDINGS
• flats
• high income group LEGEND
residence(real GREEN FRAMES WILL CONTAIN
state) • public plaza existing historical heritage
• seating area and museum
• trees
• reacreational facilities grean frame
• and parking communal buildings
private buildings

COMMUNAL BUILDINGS

those are proposed for public use and

every person can use them

PART 5
 POPULATION PROJECTION

Current population of gondar = 360,600

Current population of our site = 11056
The percentage of our sites population from total
population of gondar is
let ,x is the percentage
x=11056/360,600*100
=3.1 %
Therefore 3.1 % of the total population of gondar lives in year total population of gondar population of given site
our site 2013 265000 8215
hence we can calculate the total population of our site in 2014 306246 9493.6
each given year 2015 323875 10040.1
2016 341991 10485.4
2017 360600 11056
source ;FDRE central static agency
PART 5
 POPULATION PROJECTION

THERE ARE SEVERAL METHODS TO CALCULATE POPULATION PROJECTION

FOR NOW WE USE THE ARITHMETICAL INCREASE METHOD

FORMULA Pn = p +nX

where Pn is population projection in the future

p is present population as the recent census
n isnumber of year
we take the avarage increase of the
x is the avarage increase of population
population data from 2013 -2017 population
year population population increase let mean = x
x = 1278+547+445+571/4 P2018=11,056+1(710)
2013 8215 -
2014 9493 1278
= 2841/4 =11,766 .............................................for 2018
= 710.25
2015 10040 547
therefore the avarage increace is P2028=11056+11(710.25)
2016 10485 445
2017 11056 571
710.25 =11,056+7,812
lets calculate the projection for next =18,868 .............................................for 2028
to years
THEREFORE FOR 2018 OUR POPULATION WILL BE PROJECTED TO 18,868
PART 5
 ROAD NETWORK
PROBLEMS ON EXISTING ROAD
• lack of street greenaries
• lack of street seating
• lack of street light
• lack of quality and proper material
• most of them are not wolkable
• they are organic in plan ,are not convenience
for building arrengment
we are going to plan astreet which fullfills a current
problem
which considers the need of the pedisterian
• walkways
• street seating
• greenaries
• street lights
• street facilitis (like small koisks) EXISTING ROAD NETWORK

PART 5
 PROPOSED ROAD
NETWORK

TOTAL AREA OF THE ROAD IS ABOUT

69200 M2 OR 6.2 HA
LEGEND
street LENGTH
# STREETS MAX LENGTH
1
Sub-Arterial street (SAS) 559 meters
2 Collector Street (CS) 1857 meters
3 Local Street (LS) 2946 meters
street width
# STREETS width
1
Sub-Arterial street (SAS) 25 m
2 Collector Street (CS) 15 m and 20 m
3 Local Street (LS) 4-8 m

street LENGTH
parking

PART 5
 ROAD MATERIAL
SUB ATERIAL ROAD (SAS)
MOSTLY USED BY
• BAJAJ LOCAL STREET (LS)
• MINI BUS
• BUS
MOSTLY USED BY
• PEDISTERIAN
• LORRY
• BAJAJ
• TAXI
• MINI BUS
• BICYCLE
• TAXI
• MOTOR
• BICYCLE
• MOTOR
COLLECTORE STREET (CS) • PRIVATE CAR
MOSTLY USED BY
• BAJAJ
• MINI BUS
• BUS
• LORRY
• TAXI
• BICYCLE
• MOTOR
LEGEND
• PRIVATE CAR
COBLE STONE pedistarian road
coble stone
asphalt
asphalt two way

PART 5
 ROAD SECTION

SUB ARTERIAL STREET SAS(

2 WAY

COLLECTORE STREET CS
1 WAY
WIDTH 20 M

COLLECTORE STREET CS
1 WAY
WIDTH 15 M AND

LOCAL STREET LS
1 WAY

PART 5 WIDTH 8 M
 PROPOSED LAND USE
existing adminsttarative building
court, revenue & customs authority

existing ras gimb museum

MIXED USE (Restaurant ,Boutique, Wood work ,Gift shop

,Beauty and barber shops ,Bars ,Poolhouse bank ,insurance, Public)

proposed clinic

proposed kinder garten LEGEND

residencial
existing historical heritage
mixed use
forest to preserve the slope ,and contains reading heritage and museum
area and recretional spotes
greenary and open space
service
proposed resort due to the slope parking and street

PART 5
 PROPOSED LAND USE

LAND USE AREA LAND USE PERCENTAGE

LEGEND
residencial
mixed use
heritage and museum
greenary and open space
service

PART 5
 PROPOSED BUILDING
HEIGHT REGULATION

LEGEND
g +0
g+1
g+2 and above

GSPublisherVersion 0.97.100.100

PART 5
 PROPOSED RULES AND
REGULATION

PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT

Based on findings of the existing situation analysis the proposed building height took the following as bases.
1. Adopting previous proposals
2. Considering the existing situation
3. Protecting World Heritage Site and views from the sites to other parts of the city
4. Working with topography of the city

In accordance with the plan proposals the proposed building height consists of:
1. G+0 or 4.5m around the castle.
2. G+1following areas in No. 1 above.
3. G+2following areas in No. 2 above.
4. G 2+4 for those following those in No. 3 above
5. G +2-6 and Maximum G+6 for those remaining areas but with detailed proposals for each block presented in the proposed regu-
lationmap.
6. Construction is not allowed (except limited areas for serving) for green recreation areas.

PART 5
 PROPOSED RULES AND
REGULATION

Generally the proposed building height consists of UNESCO skyline with G+0 or maximum 4.5m.around the
Fasiledes castle and Ras Gimb and Maximum G+2, G+2-4, Maximum G+4 and G 2+6 as shown in the de-
velopment regulation map.

Proposed building setback

1. No serback, and setbacks of 2m and above are proposed along the main streets.
2. Proposed buildings are aligned to the street to strengthen the building enclosure of streets and
create sense of place.
3. The setback of buildings in parcels with outdoor reacreation areas 3-5m.
4. In some locations where setbacks are not required for functional such as the secondary market
or design purposes buildings are aligned with streets.

PART 5
 PROPOSED RULES AND
REGULATION

PROPOSED BUILDING MASSING

The buildings along the SAS are proposed to be intensive and large developments, while the grain charac-
teristics and massing decreases to collector and local streets. It is proposed that those owners having the
required plot areas and also the capacity for further development could develop their own site based on the
urban design and development regulation proposed.
As the NDP site consists of many large plots under private ownership and large number of dteriorated kbele
houses. Therefore it is proposed to increase the building quality and massing by densifying through the pro-
vision of mult-story group housings/apartments/ & mixed use buildings.

PART 5
 PROPOSED
NEIGHBOURHOOD

PART 6
 PROPOSED
NEIGHBOURHOOD
ROAD NETWORK

PART 6
 PROPOSED
NEIGHBOURHOOD

PART 6
 PROPOSED
NEIGHBOURHOOD

PART 6
 PROPOSED
NEIGHBOURHOOD

PART 6