1

Obligations & Contracts

2nd Semester 2018-2019

Partial list of cases:

Nature and Concept of Obligations, 1156

1.) Ang Yu Asuncion vs. CA, 238 SCRA 602 (1994)
2.) Sagrada Orden vs. Nacoco 91 Phil. 503 (1952)
3.) Pe vs. CA, 195 SCRA 137 (1991)

Source of Obligations, 1157-1162; 2142; 2154; 2176; 19-36; Fam-

ily Code, 195
4.) Leung vs. O'Brien, 28 Phil. 182
5.) Sagrada Orden, supra
6.) People’s Car Inc. vs. Commando Security Service
Agency, G.R. No. L-36840 May 22, 1973
7.) Clemente Briñas vs. People of the Philippines, Court
Of Appeals, G.R. No. L-30309, November 25, 1983
8.) Araneta vs. De Joya, 57 SCRA 59
9.) Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals
189 SCRA 158 (1988).
10.) Gutierrez vs. Gutierrez, 56 Phil. 177
11.) Viluan vs. CA, April 29, 1966, 16 SCRA 742

Ex Lege
12.) Pelayo vs. Lauron 12 Phil. 453

Delicts
13.) Diana vs. Batangas Transportation Co., 93 Phil 391

Quasi delicts, 1162; 2176; 2180

14.) Barredo vs. Garcia and Almario, 73 Phil. 607
15.) Elcano vs. Hill, 77 SCRA 98
16.) Baksh vs. CA. 219 SCRA 115 (1993)
**17.) Valenzuela vs. CA, 253 SCRA 303 (1996)
 2

**18.) Manila Railroad Co. vs. Compania Transatlantica,

38 Phil 875

One act, two possible sources

19.) Air France vs. Carrascoso, L- 21438, Sept. 28, 1996.

Nature and effect of Obligations, 1163

20.) Chavez vs. Gonzales, 32 SCRA 547 (1970)
21.) Rose Packing Co. vs. CA, 167 SCRA 309 (1988)
22.) Namarco vs. Federated Distributors, 49 SCRA 238
**23.) Inducil vs. de los Santos, 17 SCRA 332 (1966)

Delay or Mora, 1169-1170

24.) Vermen Realty vs. CA 224 SCRA 549 (1993)
25.) Penacio vs. Ruaya, 110 SCRA 45 (1981)
26.) Agcaoili vs. CA, 165 SCRA 1 (1988)
27.) Arrieta vs. Natl. Rice and Corn Corp., GR L-15645
(Jan. 31, 1964)
28.) Vda de Villaruel vs. Manila Motor (104 Phil. 926)

Fortuitous Events, 1174

**29.) Maranan vs. Perez, 20 SCRA 412 (1967)
30.) Dioquino vs. Laureano, 33 SCRA 65 (1970)
31.) Republic vs. Luzon Stevedoring, 21 SCRA 279
(1967)
32.) Lasam vs. Smith, 45 Phil. 657 (1967)
33.) Victorias Planters Assn. vs. Victorias Milling Co., 97
Phil. 318 (1955)A
34.) Arrieta, et al. vs. National Rice and Corn Corpora-
tion, G. R. No. L-15645, January 31, 1964

Usurious Transactions, 1175; 1413

**35.) Angel Warehousing vs. Chelda, 23 SCRA 19
36.) Briones vs. Camayo, 41 SCRA 404
 3

Presumptions, 1176
37.) Manila Trading Supply Co. vs. Medina, 2 SCRA 549
(1961)

Different Kinds of Obligations

Pure and Conditional Obligations, 1179

38.) Smithbell vs. Sotelo Matti, 44 Phil. 875 (1922)

Pure obligation
39.) Pay vs. Palanca, 57 SCRA 618

Conditional obligations

Classification of conditions
40.) Gaite vs. Fonacer, 2 SCRA 381
41.) Pay vs. Vda de Palanca, 57 SCRA 618 (1974)
42.) Parks vs. Province of Tarlac, 49 Phil 142 (1976)
43.) Songcuan vs. IAC, (191 SCRA28)
44.) Coronel vs. CA, GR No. 103577, October 7, 1996
45.) Javier vs. CA, 183 SCRA 171 (1990)
46.) Tayag vs. CA, 219 SCRA 480 (1993)

Kinds of Conditional obligations; suspensive & resolutory, 1181

47.) Jacinto vs. Kaparaz, 209 SCRA 246 (1992)
48.) Lichauco vs. Figueras Hermanos, 7 Phil. 339
49.) Ducusin vs. CA, 122 SCRA 280 (1983)
50.) Parks vs. Province of Tarlac, supra

Protestative, Casual and Mixed Conditions, 1182

51.) Rustan Pulp vs. IAC, 214 SCRA 662 (1992)
52.) Hermosa vs. Logara 49 OG 4287
53.) Osmena vs. Rama, 14 Phil. 99 (1909)
 4

54.) Trillana vs. Quezon Colleges, 93 Phil. 383 (1953)

55.) Romero vs. CA, supra
56.) Naga Telephone vs. CA, 230 SCRA 351 (1994)
57.) Smith Bell and Co vs. Sotelo Matti, 44 Phil. 847
Rescission in Reciprocal Obligations, 1191-1192

58.) Unilateral vs. Bilateral Obligations

Concept and Definition of Reciprocal Obligation

59.) Borromero vs. Franco, 5 Phil. 49

Party entitled to rescind; requisites

60.) UP vs. de los Angeles, 35 SCRA 102
61.) Philippine Amusement Enterprises vs. Natividad, 21
SCRA 284 (1967)
62.) Roque vs. Lapus, 96 SCRA 741 (1980)
63.) Angeles vs. Kalasanz, 135 SCRA 323 (1985)
64.) Boysaw vs. Interphil Promotions 148 SCRA 635
(1987)
65.) Earth Minerals vs. Macaraig, 194 SCRA 1
66.) Gimenez vs. CA, 195 SCra 205
67.) Jacinto vs. Kaparaz, supra
68.) Iaguba vs. de Leon, 132 SCRA 722 (1984)

Both parties in breach in reciprocal obligations, 1192

69.) Tan Guat vs. Pamintuan, (CA) 37 OG 3494
70.) Bosque vs. Yu Chipco, 14 Phil 95

Resolutory Period, 1193

Definition and Concept of Obligations with a Period, 1193; 1180

71.) Gaite vs. Fonacier, supra

Benefit of Term 1196

 5

72.) Lachica vs. Araneta, 47 OG, No. 11 5699, August 4,

1949
73.) Ponce de Leon vs. Syjuco, 90 Phil. 311

When courts may fix a period, 1197

74.) Araneta vs. Phil. Sugar Estates Dev't. Co., 20 SCRA
330
75.) Orit vs. Baldrogan, 106 SCRA 800 (1969)

Facultative Obligations, 1206

76.) Quizania vs. Reduguerio, 50 OG 2444

Joint and Solidary Obligations

Joint and solidary obligations, 1207-1208

77.) Ronquillo vs. CA, 132 SCRA 273 (1984)

Right to demand payment, 1216

78.) PNB vs. Conception Mining, 5 SCRA 745

Solidary Debtor, 1217-1218

79.) Wilson vs. Berkenkotter, 49 OG 1410

Defenses of the Solidary Debtor, 1222

80.) Ynchausti vs. Yulo, 34 Phil. 978

Obligations with a Penal Clause, 1226-1230

81.) Makati Development vs. Empire Insurance, 20 SCRA
557
82.) Gabarroguis vs. Vicente, L-14304, March 24, 1960

Extinguishment of Obligations

Manner, definition and importance, 1231

 6

Payment or Performance, 1231-1251

83.) Arrieta vs. NARIC, 10 SCRA 79
84.) Kalalo vs. Luz, 34 SCRA 337
85.) St. Paul vs. McCondray, 70 SCRA 112
86.) PNB vs. Pineda, 197 SCRA 1 (1991)